Zenith701801-List Digest Archive

Wed 12/19/18


Total Messages Posted: 2



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 09:28 AM - Re: Re: fuel flow for CH701 (Les Goldner)
     2. 09:46 AM - 2018 List of Contributors (Matt Dralle)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:28:18 AM PST US
    From: "Les Goldner" <lgold@quantum-associates.com>
    Subject: Re: fuel flow for CH701
    Thank you for your article about preventing fuel starvation. I have had 3 Z701's, 2 with Rotax 912UL's and have never experienced fuel starvation, even after running long distances where one tank emptied. It's interesting that both planes used fuel very differently. My first always eat about 20% more fuel from my right tanks (I had a 40-gal system) and my current plane (20-gal system) uses almost identical amounts of fuel from both sides. I think you explained this difference in was due to air pressure. -----Original Message----- From: owner-zenith701801-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-zenith701801-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of kissell Sent: Friday, August 17, 2018 2:39 PM Subject: Zenith701801-List: Re: fuel flow for CH701 --> <kissellr@ameritech.net> I recently received a phone call from someone at the NTSB regarding the Zenith fuel system. I have not yet followed through with the query but it did cause me to re-examine the Zenith fuel problem which I wrote about more than ten years ago. In an article I found regarding a crash from fuel failure in a CH-750 https://generalaviationnews.com/2016/04/29/bad-fuel-system-design-contributes-to -accident/, I analyzed what was in the article and present here my analysis of how fuel starvation can occur under very special conditions. In the original article (http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?t=48650I ; I mentioned how a difference in pressure, developed by the slip stream above the vented fuel caps can impact fuel flow. I did discuss the case when the fuel tanks are full and the possibly of fuel venting in flight but did not discuss what happens when fuel runs low in one tank. The crash article explains that there was about 6 gallon of fuel left in one tank and the the other was empty. The puzzle was how can the engine starve for fuel when there is six gallons of fuel in one tank. Using the dimensions of the Zenith 701 tank (10 gallon) each, six gallons would require about 3.25 inch of depth in the tank. The tank has a floor area of about 427.4 square inch and there is 231 cubic inch in a gallon of fuel so 6 gallon has 1386 cubic inch of volume. Divided by the tank floor area results in 1386/427.4= 3.2428 inch of required depth in the tank for the 6 gallons. So now the question becomes how much pressure difference between the two tanks does it take to support 3.25 inch of fuel height. Each cubic inch of fuel weighs 0.0272728 pound, ( see previous article using 6.3 pounds per gallon), so 3.25 times 0.0272728 = 0.0884 pound. Since this was all done relative to square inches the pressure difference is thus about 0.09 psi. This indicates that if the fuel caps and air flow combination created a pressure difference of 0.09 psi between the two tanks, the fuel in the tank with the lower pressure would settle at abut 3.25 inch higher than the fuel level in the other tank and would maintain this level difference throughout the flight, providing the conditions did not change. Eventually the tank with the higher pressure (lower level) would run out of fuel before the other tank and the tank with fuel (lower pressure) would still have about 6 gallons of fuel that would not be usable because the pressure difference would be supporting (lifting) the fuel as before. The tank fuel lines tied together would likely fill with air being pulled from the empty tank towards the one with fuel. The aircraft fuel pump would not be able to draw fuel since the line has only air in it. It can be seen that very little pressure difference is required to result in a substantial volume of fuel trapped and unusable. This "head" or difference in fuel level is proportional to the difference in tank pressure. As this shows it is very important to that the pressure on the top side of each tank are kept the same if all of the fuel is to be usable. In the article I wrote ten years ago I solved this problem on my aircraft by adding snorkel tubes to my fuel caps which created about +0.1 psi of tank pressure (measure value) during flight. The exact pressure is not that important, but both of them being the same is. Another recommendation was to add a vent tube to connect the top of each tank together to equalize the pressure. This is not easy on the Zenith designs and in my case I had already built the aircraft. The snorkel vents, described in the earlier article have been in use o! n my aircraft for 10 years and have solved my fuel level so far. I hope this helps you builders make good fuel systems in particular on Zenith aircraft. I have found my aircraft,N701UB to be a joy to fly and very reliable. The crash article was perhaps a little harsh towards the design, I think it's pretty good and thank Zenith for it. But there are always room for improvement.. regards Bob Kissell, Dayton, Ohio N701UB 400+ CH701 flight hours and climbing.. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=482504#482504


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:46:34 AM PST US
    From: Matt Dralle <dralle@matronics.com>
    Subject: 2018 List of Contributors
    Dear Listers, The 2018 Matronics Email List and Forum Fund Raiser officially ended a couple of weeks ago and it's time that I published this year's List of Contributors. It is the people on this list that directly make these Email Lists and Forums possible! Their generous Contributions keep the servers and Internet connection up and running! You can still show your support this year and pick up a great gift at the same time. The Contribution Web Site is fast, easy, and secure: http://www.matronics.com/contribution Or, by dropping a personal check in the mail to: Matt Dralle / Matronics 581 Jeannie Way Livermore CA 94550 And finally, I'm proud to present The 2018 Fund Raiser List of Contributors: http://www.matronics.com/loc Thank you again to everyone that made a Contribution this year!! Matt Dralle Matronics Email List & Forum Administrator




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   zenith701801-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/Zenith701801-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/zenith701801-list
  • Browse Zenith701801-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/zenith701801-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --