Matronics Email Lists Forum Index Matronics Email Lists
Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
 
 Get Email Distribution Too!Get Email Distribution Too!    FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Edge Distances on the 701

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> Zenith-List
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
dplozay(at)cox.net
Guest





PostPosted: Sun Jan 01, 2006 6:22 am    Post subject: Edge Distances on the 701 Reply with quote


Here's a seemingly simple question, "what is the minimum edge distance for holes on the 701?" This issue is seemingly simple because the Construction Manual states the "Absolute Minimum edge distance" as 2 x Hole Diameter; great here's a fixed standard. This issue is confusing because the plans sometimes call for rivets to be placed closer to edges than this standard (for example part 7V4-4 on drawing page 7V5 specifies a rivet line (for A5 rivets) 7mm from the top of the part. I get concerned because I calculate the minimum edge distance as 2 x 4mm 8mm. Hmmm, what am I missing?
I'm also having difficulty achieving minimum edge distance on the Bent L Angle that is riveted to the side of part 7V4-5 (see page 7V5). How have you experienced 701 builders solved this problem?
Dave, Omaha NE
701


- The Matronics Zenith-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith-List
Back to top
larrymc(at)qconline.com
Guest





PostPosted: Sun Jan 01, 2006 7:48 am    Post subject: Edge Distances on the 701 Reply with quote


David,
The drawing supersedes any "absolute rules" that are provided for
general good practice. Only the designer
can establish a dimension that violates the rule, because he knows what
the long term result will be. Trust
the drawing, consider the rule for general good practice, but follow the
drawing.
Larry McFarland - 601HDS at www.macsmachine.com
David Plozay wrote:
Here's a seemingly simple question, "what is the minimum edge distance for holes on the 701?" This issue is seemingly simple because the Construction Manual states the "Absolute Minimum edge distance" as 2 x Hole Diameter; great here's a fixed standard. This issue is confusing because the plans sometimes call for rivets to be placed closer to edges than this standard (for example part 7V4-4 on drawing page 7V5 specifies a rivet line (for A5 rivets) 7mm from the top of the part. I get concerned because I calculate the minimum edge distance as 2 x 4mm 8mm. Hmmm, what am I missing?
I'm also having difficulty achieving minimum edge distance on the Bent L Angle that is riveted to the side of part 7V4-5 (see page 7V5). How have you experienced 701 builders solved this problem?
Dave, Omaha NE
701


- The Matronics Zenith-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith-List
Back to top
p.mulwitz(at)worldnet.att
Guest





PostPosted: Sun Jan 01, 2006 8:45 am    Post subject: Edge Distances on the 701 Reply with quote


Hi David,
I am pretty new at metal airplane building myself, so I am not sure I
have the edge distance thing worked out correctly.
First, a 1/8" rivet is around 3 mm in diameter. 2 times that is 6
mm. This comes out to 4.5 mm from the edge of the hole to the edge
of the metal since edge distance is measured from the center of the
rivet hole. An A4 rivet is close to 1/8" and an A5 is just a little
bigger. My guess for the minimum A5 edge distance is 6 mm.
It gets a little fuzzy when you consider where edge distance
applies. It seems that when you are putting rivets into an "Angle"
the distance does apply to the open edge of the angle but not to the
edge where the bend is. I don't know exactly why that is, but that
seems to be the case. Perhaps one of the better trained listers can
address this subject for both of us.
Paul
XL wings
do not archive
Quote:
Here's a seemingly simple question, "what is the minimum edge
distance for holes on the 701?" This issue is seemingly simple
because the Construction Manual states the "Absolute Minimum edge
distance" as 2 x Hole Diameter; great here's a fixed standard. This
issue is confusing because the plans sometimes call for rivets to be
placed closer to edges than this standard (for example part 7V4-4 on
drawing page 7V5 specifies a rivet line (for A5 rivets) 7mm from the
top of the part. I get concerned because I calculate the minimum
edge distance as 2 x 4mm 8mm. Hmmm, what am I missing?
I'm also having difficulty achieving minimum edge distance on the
Bent L Angle that is riveted to the side of part 7V4-5 (see page
7V5). How have you experienced 701 builders solved this problem?
Dave, Omaha NE
701

--


- The Matronics Zenith-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith-List
Back to top
larrymc(at)qconline.com
Guest





PostPosted: Sun Jan 01, 2006 12:49 pm    Post subject: Edge Distances on the 701 Reply with quote


Paul,
The edge distance is a similar to pitch settings for rivets. Most of
the edge distance issues relate more
to thin materials, that when pulled together by a rivet create a ripple
or stress wave to occur. Too close to the
edge and you eventually will see cracks from each rivet to the edge.
Probably would take a long time.
Same goes for too close a pitch. Eventually you see a crack running
from rivet to rivet because of the
stress wave that circles one rivet affecting the circle of stress at the
next. When you get too close
to the edge, the circle is upset by a broken wave and eventually the
material relaxes or breaks.
The edge distance issue probably has a margin for safety, but that would
depend on the size rivet
and the thickness of material as well as the kind of material you're
working with. 6061 aluminum is
probably the most forgiving of these, where 2024 would not.
Larry McFarland - 601HDS at www.macsmachine.com
Paul Mulwitz wrote:
Hi David,
I am pretty new at metal airplane building myself, so I am not sure I
have the edge distance thing worked out correctly.
First, a 1/8" rivet is around 3 mm in diameter. 2 times that is 6
mm. This comes out to 4.5 mm from the edge of the hole to the edge
of the metal since edge distance is measured from the center of the
rivet hole. An A4 rivet is close to 1/8" and an A5 is just a little
bigger. My guess for the minimum A5 edge distance is 6 mm.
It gets a little fuzzy when you consider where edge distance
applies. It seems that when you are putting rivets into an "Angle"
the distance does apply to the open edge of the angle but not to the
edge where the bend is. I don't know exactly why that is, but that
seems to be the case. Perhaps one of the better trained listers can
address this subject for both of us.
Paul
XL wings
do not archive


- The Matronics Zenith-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith-List
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> Zenith-List All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group