 |
Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
messydeer
Joined: 13 Feb 2006 Posts: 214 Location: Bellingham, WA
|
Posted: Thu Jul 15, 2010 6:36 am Post subject: Facet Boost Pump Fuses |
|
|
Hi!
I'm wondering what size fuse to use for my Facet 40104 boost pump. I talked to somebody in their engineering department and he said 3 is recommended. I told him I'd heard of a couple people blowing 3A fuses in a 40105. They replaced it with a 5A and had no further problems. For some reason Facet is stingy with documentation. They list 20 or more pumps and give only their psi and gph ranges individually, then lump them all together and say they draw an average of 1.6A. The 04 I have is the smallest, with the 05 only slightly bigger. http://www.facet-purolator.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=category§ionid=7&id=16&Itemid=31
I asked if putting a 5A in would work. The Facet dude said it probably would work, but it'd increase the chance of wrecking the coil, but wouldn't get hot enough to start a fire. I have 15-20' round trip of 20awg wire going to it, so I know a 5A fuse would protect the wire. I plan on using this as a boost pump for my mechanical, turning it on before startup, check the pressure, then some seconds later crank the engine. It would then be turned off at altitude and back on for landing. The boost pump is near the bottom of the cowl, ~1' below the mechanical pump. They are in series with no recirculation, so it would be pumping with no flow until cranking.
The fuses I'm thinking of are the fast ATO/ATC style. I could go with slower 3AG fuses, if there is a any advantage in doing this. I assume that if the Facet is pumping against a closed valve a couple feet downstream it would in a few seconds reach its max current draw. I haven't heard of anyone wrecking their boost pump, just a few that blew 3A fuses.
I'm waiting for Facet to return my emailed questions. I also could bench test this pump with my VOM and see what the current draw really is.
Suggestions?
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
_________________ Dan |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelect Guest
|
Posted: Thu Jul 15, 2010 1:40 pm Post subject: Facet Boost Pump Fuses |
|
|
At 09:36 AM 7/15/2010, you wrote:
Quote: |
Hi!
I asked if putting a 5A in would work. The Facet dude said it
probably would work, but it'd increase the chance of wrecking the
coil, but wouldn't get hot enough to start a fire.
|
That is . . . shall we say . . . no . . . I'll be civil.
First, supply fuse (at least in an airplane) is never
intended to protect devices . . . only wiring.
Quote: | I have 15-20' round trip of 20awg wire going to it, so I know a 5A
fuse would protect the wire. I plan on using this as a boost pump
for my mechanical, turning it on before startup, check the
pressure, then some seconds later crank the engine. It would then be
turned off at altitude and back on for landing. The boost pump is
near the bottom of the cowl, ~1' below the mechanical pump. They are
in series with no recirculation, so it would be pumping with no flow
until cranking.
|
If it's 20AWG, put a 7A fuse in an don't loose
any sleep over it. Having too robust a feeder
protection cannot put anything inside the pump
at risk.
Quote: | The fuses I'm thinking of are the fast ATO/ATC style. I could go
with slower 3AG fuses, if there is a any advantage in doing this. I
assume that if the Facet is pumping against a closed valve a couple
feet downstream it would in a few seconds reach its max current
draw. I haven't heard of anyone wrecking their boost pump, just a
few that blew 3A fuses.
I'm waiting for Facet to return my emailed questions. I also could
bench test this pump with my VOM and see what the current draw really is.
|
We had a thread on this topic some months ago. The
current draw by solenoid pumps is pulsed. I cited
a number of patents that go back to the 50s or earlier.
The first devices had mechanical contacts that pulsed
the coil when the fuel pumping piston approached end
of stroke thus pulling the piston back against a spring
for another stroke. The energy consumption of these
pumps WAS somewhat dependent in fuel flow. You could
hear the stroke-rate go up as flow increased.
Modern pumps are all solid state, no switches and
simply pulse the coil so many times per minute irrespective
of flow rate. If the flow is high, the piston strokes
long in the bore. If the flow is low, the piston barely
moves with each pulsed and tends to stay in the max
compressed end of the stroke.
Trying to get any sort of current measurement on
on of these things by watching a meter is meaningless.
It will be all over the place. A true ENERGY
measurement must be made with some RMS type ammeter
having a very long time constant . . . or a fast
data acquisition system that will secure a sufficiently
verbose data stream to do bit-wise integration of
current values.
I've got that on my list of things to do . . . in fact,
there's a Facet pump on my bench loaned to me by a
generous Lister for that purpose. I tried to get
real engineering data from Facet on several occasions
with no success. I'm doubtful that anyone there
even understood the question.
Nonetheless, the have been building a really slick,
trouble-free product for a very long time. You don't
have to know how it all works to serve great hamburgers,
fries and a shake . . . just follow directions. It's
the ISO way.
Bob . . .
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jloram
Joined: 07 Nov 2009 Posts: 54 Location: United States
|
Posted: Thu Jul 15, 2010 6:20 pm Post subject: Facet Boost Pump Fuses |
|
|
[quote] --
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
messydeer
Joined: 13 Feb 2006 Posts: 214 Location: Bellingham, WA
|
Posted: Fri Jul 16, 2010 10:57 am Post subject: Re: Facet Boost Pump Fuses |
|
|
Thanks, Bob
Nice to get some background on how the pump works.
Facet told me in an email 5A would be fine, I see from Table 11-3 of AC43.13-1B a 5A fuse would work, and you say 7A is peachy. So I'm happy and will think no more about this issue.
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
Description: |
|
Filesize: |
36.83 KB |
Viewed: |
5671 Time(s) |

|
_________________ Dan |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelect Guest
|
Posted: Fri Jul 16, 2010 5:05 pm Post subject: Facet Boost Pump Fuses |
|
|
> If it's 20AWG, put a 7A fuse in an don't loose
> any sleep over it. Having too robust a feeder
> protection cannot put anything inside the pump
> at risk.
>
Would this reasoning not lead to running "really" robust feeders/fuses, and
then a fuel pump (or other device) with and internal problem that is
generating a lot of heat (fire/smoke)?
I agree that we're not trying to 'save/protect' the pump, rather trying to
prevent smoking wires, but a smoking load can be a big problem, too.
Most devices we use in our airplanes are considered
not flight worthy if they exhibit any failure mode that
becomes a hazard source for combustion . . . emitting
smoke is frowned upon too. The "really robust" feeders
was more rhetorical than anything else . . . after all,
with a fuse block, one has the option of selecting the
optimal fuse for each application . . . and easily
changing it if later circumstances suggest it's a
good idea. Specifically, with the FACET being a low
energy device totally enclosed in a metal box. The
risks are nil . . .
[img]cid:7.1.0.9.0.20100716195619.01fe8f38(at)aeroelectric.com.0[/img]
Although I seem to recall that G. Richter suggested
that the entire airplane could be configured with an
array of one-size-fits-all, self-resetting PTC polyswitches
soldered to a nifty etched circuit board product he
offered. But when it's so easy to achieve the elegant
solution, why not do it?
Bob . . .
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
Description: |
|
Filesize: |
26.77 KB |
Viewed: |
5661 Time(s) |

|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|