  | 
				Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists   
				 | 
			 
		 
		 
	
		| View previous topic :: View next topic   | 
	 
	
	
		| Author | 
		Message | 
	 
	
		sblack
 
 
  Joined: 14 Aug 2010 Posts: 21
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Tue Jan 11, 2011 4:48 am    Post subject: CorvairEngines-List Digest: 4 Msgs -   01/08/11 | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				You don't build a WW engine. You build a corvair engine useing his conversion method and accessories. You are in charge and you take responsibility for what you do. It is not up to him to guarantee your work. And for what its worth, the rest of the engine in a WW conversion uses new internal components i.e. rods and pistons. MM has 1 crank. Has it flown? Will 2 1/2 times stronger result in significant increase in fatigue resistance? Will there be harmonic issues? Quality control issues? Is it from China? We don't know. If you advise people to go this way based on no real experience you are advising them to become a test pilot (assuming they can actually get a crank - the website still says they can't). Will you guarantee it? Will MM guarantee it based on no test experience? You are giving advice based on seeing an engine that has not flown based on a crank that is not available and even if it was has not been tested. 
   
  The real issue with the corvair design for aircraft (and the VW) is that the end bearing is not designed for prop loads - it isn't big enough. WW has figured this out as have others. Making the crank stronger does not necessarily address this. A bigger bearing does. It took many years and higher power installations for the crank issue to present itself. It is only with many hundreds of hrs of testing that this new crank will prove itself if it becomes commercially available, which it is NOT right now. So telling people that it is way better is simply guesswork from somebody with no experience (other than having seen one) representing a company with no experience. And selling a component that has not been tested is irresponsible. 
  		 	   		    [quote][b]
 
  |  | - The Matronics CorvairEngines-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?CorvairEngines-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  _________________ Scott Black
 
Montreal
 
Jodel F11 O-200 | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		sblack
 
 
  Joined: 14 Aug 2010 Posts: 21
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Tue Jan 11, 2011 4:51 am    Post subject: CorvairEngines-List Digest: 4 Msgs -   01/08/11 | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				  "whiz bang stuff from the conscientious and well paid craftsman in land of Mao."
   
  That's classic! I almost want to put that up on my wall!
   
  Scott
  		 	   		    [quote][b]
 
  |  | - The Matronics CorvairEngines-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?CorvairEngines-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  _________________ Scott Black
 
Montreal
 
Jodel F11 O-200 | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		MRus597999(at)aol.com Guest
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Tue Jan 11, 2011 9:37 am    Post subject: CorvairEngines-List Digest: 4 Msgs -   01/08/11 | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Well you obviously haven't been watching WW website, MM engines have flown  and are fying. Read WW website and discover the issue he has had with his broken  cranks, including nitrided ones. I have personally talked to some of WW engine  users who had broken cranks.Not jsut the ones mentioned by WW on his  website or in his book, a book that I have on my shelf next to this  computer. This builder regretted not getting another type  engine   in the first place.  If you want to continue to believe WW's own  personal  promotion and publicity go ahead, It's all anecdotal and all  comes from WW himself. Has any independent agency really looked at his work? No!  it all comes from him and those that haven't crashed yet. By your logic all new  parts are suspect and 100,000 mile cranks are not; In this instance I have  personally seen both operations at work. They are both respectable and I don't  criticize either. Nor will I slavishly "adore" one  as opposed to the  other. WW is knowledgeable and I subscribe to his ideas wholeheartedly, but it  turns me off when the first thing out his mouth is to bad mouth others in the  field. He has personally expressed  to me in personal conversations  regarding Aeromax, and the well respected and long time builder of corvair  engines from Long Beach, as well as others. It is unnecessary.   
   
  I'm a little turned off by WW arrogance and disdain for anything not of  WW.  But to rebut your argument that WW does not make the parts or sell  then realize that WW does sell nitrided cranks, look at his website; look at his  books that show pictures of them. The crank IS the crux of this engine. You  can't do anything with your corvair engine with a broken crank in flight. He has  and does sell engines. Ask some of those who have had broken cranks in  flight, including Langford, who has broken a couple including used nitrided  ones. What do you say then about WW's excpertise. Other parts are new  that are to be installed. Are all my parts in my corvair to be new EXCEPT the  crank?
   
  By the way. Interestingly enough, the only cranks to break are those in  engines that were "souped" up or overstressed. The standard engine without a 5th  bearing did fine and none broke around the 4th bearing.
   
  MDR
  PS, this is my last post and I will respond to no more postings. Do what  you wish, you are obviously married to WW and are not seeking even a trial  separation to look at others who have some interesting things to do and say in  this rather interesting field involving flying contraptions.
   
   In a message dated 1/11/2011 4:48:54 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,  scott-black(at)sympatico.ca writes:
   	  | Quote: | 	 		  You    don't build a WW engine. You build a corvair engine useing his conversion    method and accessories. You are in charge and you take responsibility for what    you do. It is not up to him to guarantee your work. And for what its worth,    the rest of the engine in a WW conversion uses new internal components i.e.    rods and pistons. MM has 1 crank. Has it flown? Will 2 1/2 times    stronger result in significant increase in fatigue resistance? Will there    be harmonic issues? Quality control issues? Is it from China? We don't    know. If you advise people to go this way based on no real experience you are    advising them to become a test pilot (assuming they can actually get a crank -    the website still says they can't). Will you guarantee it? Will MM guarantee    it based on no test experience? You are giving advice based on seeing an    engine that has not flown based on a crank that is not available and even if    it was has not been tested. 
  
 The real issue with the corvair    design for aircraft (and the VW) is that the end bearing is not designed for    prop loads - it isn't big enough. WW has figured this out as have others.    Making the crank stronger does not necessarily address this. A    bigger bearing does. It took many years and higher power installations for the    crank issue to present itself. It is only with many hundreds of hrs of testing    that this new crank will prove itself if it becomes commercially available,    which it is NOT right now. So telling people that it is way better is simply    guesswork from somebody with no experience (other than having seen one)    representing a company with no experience. And selling a component that has    not been tested is irresponsible. 
  	  | Quote: | 	 		  
 
 ====================================
 s-List href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?CorvairEngines-List">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?CorvairEngines-List
 ====================================
 ms.matronics.com/">http://forums.matronics.com
 ====================================
 tp://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/contribution
 ====================================
 
  | 	 
  | 	  
   [quote][b]
 
  |  | - The Matronics CorvairEngines-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?CorvairEngines-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		 | 
	 
 
  
	 
	    
	   | 
	
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
  | 
   
 
  
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
  
		 |