=0ASuper - Thanks Bob!=0A =0AJon=0A =0ADO NOT ARCHIVE=0A=0A-----Original Me
ssage-----=0AFrom: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <nuckolls.bob@aeroelectric.com
>=0ASent: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 8:14am=0ATo: aeroelectric-list@matronics.
com=0ASubject: Re: Continued: Preferred Method for Redun
dant Power Sources to Single Input=0A=0AAt 07:18 PM 3/15/2010, you wrote:
=0AHi Bob,=0A =0ARegarding this archive thread: [http://forums.matronics.c
om/viewtopic.php?p=272463#272463] http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.p
hp?p=272463#272463=0A =0AI am interested to know the answer to the final
question. It was also the first question that came into my head after readi
ng your response. I'm not sure whether or not the answer matters but suspec
t that knowing the answer will answer that question!! ;-) =0A =0AGordon
Smith wrote:=0A"In this case when the two always-on sources differ by a vol
t or two, for whatever reason, Do the sources provide power proportionally
to their voltage or will it be a 100% feed from the highest voltage source?
" =0A=0A The two either-or sources feeding a pair of diodes=0A need diffe
r by only a few hundred millvolts for the=0A HIGHER of the two to pick up
tp://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List] http://www.matronics.co
=========
