![]() |
![]() |
| eclarsen81@aol.com | Re: Certified Engine question | |||
| Ben Charvet | Certified Engine question | |||
| Ben Charvet | Certified Engine question | |||
| eclarsen81@aol.com | Re: Certified Engine question |
Subject: RE: Certified Engine question From: Deems Herring (dsleepy47@hotmail.com) Date: Sun Nov 15 - 1:51 PM There is no requirement to remove the data plate or stop calling it a Conti nental. You actually have several options. If you can find an A&P who will supervise and sign off the work you do you can do that. If you want to perf orm the work without supervision then you make an engine log entry that it was built or experimental use. "Overhaul" has a specific meaning to the FAA and you should not put that in the log unless you meet the FAA requirement s for an overhaul. The requirement for phase 1 is a certified design=2C the experimental engines and "kits" supplied by the engine manufactures are ro utinely given the 25 phase 1. If anyone tells you the data plate needs to be removed=2C ask them politely which FAA regulation requires that (there isn't one). Deems I've been told that to call my engine a Continental > A-65 and leave the data plate on=2C that all this work would need to be > signed off by an A&P. _________________________________________________________________ Hotmail: Trusted email with powerful SPAM protection.
|