![]() |
![]() |
| Brian Davies | RE: Safety improvement list | |||
| rampil | Re: Door locked inflight by pip-pins. | |||
| Raimo Toivio | Door locked inflight by pip-pins. | |||
| Peter Zutrauen | Re: Door locked inflight by pip-pins. |
Subject: RE: Door locked inflight by pip-pins. From: Karl Heindl (kheindl@msn.com) Date: Wed Nov 18 - 7:14 AM Raimo=2C Yes=2C I accept your reasoning=2C and I am surprised to read that Cessnas h ave internal locks. Their checklists probably say to not have them locked o n takeoff and landing. My PFA inspector would not have approved the mod=2C although=2C my passenger door does have a pip pin lock for locking on the g round only. Of course=2C if I were to end up inverted=2C which is very like ly in a trigear=2C in an otherwise successful emergency landing=2C it would n't make any difference whether doors were locked or not=2C as the doors co uldn't be opened anyway=2C except with brute force. I keep meaning to get o ne of those emergency exit hammers just for that nightmare situation=2C and to reroute the fuel vent to the bottom of the fuselage. Regarding CO alarms=2C I can only recommend one which shows any presence of the gas in ppm=2C and with a high pitched alarm when a safe figure and/or duration is exceeded. You can get them in any hardware store. I had a case not long ago=2C when a loose exhaust pipe caused some carbon m onoxide to leak into the cabin. On the other hand=2C it also confirmed that fumes which sometimes enter via the flap slots on landing did not register on the instrument. Karl From: raimo.toivio@rwm.fi To: europa-list@matronics.com Subject: Door locked inflight by pip-pins. Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 07:14:48 AM PST "Are you serious ? In an accident=2C how would a potential rescuer get the doors open ?" Karl=2C I understand your point but I have thought it very carefully and I am very serious and happy with my always locked doors when inflight (I have pip-pin s both side)! The risks of the unlocked doors when inflight are heavier than the risks of the pip-pin locked doors when crash landed. Consider this: 1) An unthinking passenger can easily lift the lever and ask "what is this? ". Shit happens=2C really. The pip pin prevents accidents like this - a pilot has more time to react a nd say no no no. The function of the pip-pin is in this case to be a retarder! 2) Pilots=B4s or co-pilot=B4s sleeve could easily lift the lever by acciden t - pip pin prevents this. The guard alone is good but not 100% guaranteed. The function of the pip-pi n is in this case to be a safety catch. 3) Passenger side=B4s pip-pin is a good=2C simple and effective door lock w hen grounded. The function of the pip-pin is in this case to be just a lock. 4) I have in my POH: before emergency landing remove door pip-pins. 5) In the case of emergency landing and the doors are still locked: do you really think it is difficult to open the door? Just kick the window and it is gone=2C surely! For "potential rescuer" it is not a problem at all! It i s the smallest worry in this case! Those pip-pins are clearly visible and u nderstandable. BTW both of the C172=B4s doors are inflight lockable. I know some people l ock them and some do not. I locked them always when flying but that was for personal comfort only. When locked the lever was levelled and the armrest was usable. I am not sure what do they say in Cessnas POH - my guess is "do open the door locks before landing". Karl=2C do you accept my (serious) points? Would you like to see the pick of my pip-pin equipped door lever guards? Raimo OH-XRT
|