Re: Re: New Rudder Question


Subject:    Re: Re: New Rudder Question
From:    David Downey (planecrazydld@yahoo.com)
Date:    Thu Sep 04 - 9:36 AM
Andy, they are huge changes in terms of the ripple effects. I do not have t
he expertise to adequately assess them though. I will be lurking here to se
e what comes out.

David L. Downey  Harleysville-(SE) PA, USA


--- On Thu, 9/4/08, ashontz <ashontz@nbme.org> wrote:
From: ashontz <ashontz@nbme.org>
Subject: Re: New Rudder Question
To: zenith601-list@matronics.com
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2008 09:36:49 AM PDT

<ashontz@nbme.org>

Dave, that was my question exactly. I just e-mailed Sebastien to see if I c
ould
have a peek at the wing structure pdf. That's the only significant change o
n
the list, and honestly, it's a huge change. Changing the angle of incidence
is no small change. How would one go about doing that if say you left the X
L
wing structure alone but actually tilted the wing back a few degrees. And h
ow
much would you need to tilt it back before it really made a noticable
difference?

[quote="planecrazydld(at)yahoo.co"]does the wing still have the
forward angled main spar and the slight forward sweep like the old one?

David L. Downey
  Harleysville (SE) PA, USA


--- On Tue, 8/5/08, Jay Maynard  wrote:
[quote]From: Jay Maynard 
Subject: Re: Re: New Rudder Question
To: zenith601-list@matronics.com
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2008 09:36:49 AM PDT



On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 08:58:14AM -0700, Walter Carey wrote:

>  I think the model number change (650 vs 601) is just a way for Zenith to
>  distance itself from the concern over the rumored  wing problem (nothing
>  proven to date).
> 
> 

Not even that...just a way to get press. "Hey, we've introduced a new
model!"

The only structural differences are the new rudder, the new canopy and
turtledeck, and the wing angle of incidence was very slightly adjusted to
lower the nose a tad.
   

>  I like the new canopy latching system and think it can be adapted to a
601
>  that still has the canopy under construction. It wouldn't have a
split
>  canopy, but the new latching system looks like it could be used on the
old
>  type one-piece canopy. Any thoughts/ideas on adapting the new latching
>  system to a 601? Looks pretty straight forward to me.
> 
> 

My 601 has the new latch. Works fine. It was reported here recently that
they're developing a retrofit kit.
-- 
Jay Maynard, K5ZC                   http://www.conmicro.com
http://jmaynard.livejournal.com              
> [b]


--------
Andy Shontz

do not archive

CH601XL - Corvair
www.mykitlog.com/ashontz


Read this topic online here:

http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 2540#202540


=0A=0A=0A      




Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   Zenith601-List@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/Zenith601-List.htm
  • Full Archive Search Engine
  •   http://www.matronics.com/search
  • 7-Day List Browsing
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Browse the List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contributions

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --