Kolb-Archive.digest.vol-gt

June 03, 2007 - July 03, 2007



      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=116117#116117
      
      
________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Fly-by
Date: Jun 03, 2007
| Does anyone have an address for Homer's? Kolb, Homer 580 Wall St Phoenixville, PA 19460 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Ed Chmielewski" <edchmiel(at)mindspring.com>
Subject: Re: English/American
Date: Jun 03, 2007
Pat, Pulleeze, enough is enough! The US and UK may have different airworthiness standards for ultralights but, judging from the British and American UL publications, there is not that big a difference in the aircraft. You make it sound as if most US ultralights wouldn't make it past the oh-so-stringent UK inspections. While your regs may be different, they sound like more of a big pain than having to do with safety. I'd take our system over yours any day. Much more simple, and a lot more freedom (as you recently experienced at MV). ----- Original Message ----- From: "pat ladd" <pj.ladd(at)btinternet.com> Sent: Friday, June 01, 2007 12:25 PM Subject: Re: Kolb-List: English/American > > Does the UK allow for UL un-certificated pilots and the UL vehicles to > go without annual condition inspection?>> > > Hi Thom, > There is no such thing as an un-certificated pilot here. A Pilots licence > normally allows flying a plane up to a certain weight. Below the > Ultralight weight limit of 450 k there are certain allowances and a > microlight licence will not entitle piloting a GA machine. How does this answer Thom's question? (Snip) . Each countries manufacturers > have until now had to get a plane through its own countries hoops and then > all the other countries as well. Although our Section `S` is well regarded > as a bench mark. By whom? Never heard of it. (Snip) > I didn`t mention in my post the angst which our PFA Chief Engineer had to > go through as he explained to a nice old chap, over tea and cucumber > sandwiches naturally, that the plane on which he had lavished hundreds of > hours of work and a pile of money was a flying coffin fit only for the > scrap heap. Thats when he earns his money. What aircraft, and when? (If he's "volunteer, unpaid", how does he "earn his money"?) We have a saying here, "You get what you pay for". > The regs we have are a pain in the butt but a first time builder can be > confident that with an approved kit, the building of which has been > checked by (Volunteer, unpaid) inspectors and on which the test flying has > been properly conducted will not bite him. It will not vicously drop a > wing when stalled. The engine will not die from fuel starvation during a > full throttle climb out. Again, what instances/aircraft are you citing? What training/standards do the inspectors meet? Are they all Aircraft/Aerospace Engineers? In fact if he has trouble it is probably the pilot , not the > plane. More importantly perhaps the guy with little experience who buys it > second or third hand can be equally confident that basically the design > and build is sound and he can sell it without the possibility of being > sued if things go wrong. Anyone who buys a used aircraft and doesn't have it inspected (by an A&P or IA) is foolish, wouldn't you agree? The days of 'shade-tree' design and manufacture are fortunately long gone. Even the most basic designs are able to be produced using computer-based engineering programs, taking the guesswork out of stress-analysis and such. Sorry to the List in general, but I'm not the only one here who finds your continued 'US-bashing' offensive. Our two countries have different ways to meet aircraft safety requirements. I happen to believe ours is a better system, but that's my opinion and I'm gentleman enough to keep it to myself. I would prefer you do the same. Ed in JXN MkII/503 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 03, 2007
From: Terry <tkrolfe(at)usadatanet.net>
Subject: Fly-in to Homer's
Gentlemen, It's time to get a count of how many are planing on coming to Clara & Homer Kolb's Father's Day Fly-in on Saturday June 16th. I need to let them know how many are coming so that they may prepare for the group. If you name isn't already on the list, please add it or let me know in the next couple of days. Also, if your name is on the list, but you now find you can't make it, let me know! Hope to see many of you there! For those flying there: Co-ordinates: N 40 deg 09' 36.3" Also you can check, Airnav.com for more information. W 075 deg 32' 46.6" John Hauck gave the address for those driving there, so you should be able to look it up on a mapping program. Those that said they are coming so far: "Add your name if it's not listed". Gene Zimmerman John Hauck Wilmer Zimmerman John Murr Earl Zimmerman Eddy Zimmerman Luray Weachter Steve Green Ron - from Arizona? Thom Riddle Bob Bean Chuck Davis George Alexander Bill Varnes Alan Mancus Scott Olendorf Dave Kulp Dan Walter Rick Kelbon Bob Bennethum & Me Terry - Firefly #95 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Fly-by
From: "Don G" <donghe@one-eleven.net>
Date: Jun 03, 2007
WAHOOOO>..Boy oh Boy John...that rotax sure does sound good! Nuttin quite sounds as good as a 1500 hp Kolb! -------- Don G. Central Illinois Kitfox IV Speedster Luscombe 8A http://www.geocities.com/dagger369th/my_firefly.htm Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=116187#116187 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: DAquaNut(at)aol.com
Date: Jun 03, 2007
Subject: Re:447 Thrust
************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: DAquaNut(at)aol.com
Date: Jun 03, 2007
Subject: Re: 447 thrust
Group, I finally got around to flying the firefly Fri. evening after doing a decarbon. She fired right up and seems to idle a little smoother but I ran out of time. I had to reset the Ivo to 6250 static as she was almost making 6800 rpm in level flight. How do I verify the 447 is making full HP. I had the prop off, so even though I have adjusted the pitch to obtain 6250 rpm ,I do not know if the pitch is the same as it was before,so I dont know for sure I f it is putting out full power. How do I go about doing this check? Ed Diebel FF #62


**************************************
See what's free at http://www.aol.com. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: 447 Thrust
From: "The BaronVonEvil" <grageda(at)innw.net>
Date: Jun 03, 2007
Hi Ed, Did you check the pitch of the prop prior to adjusting it ? Do you know if you had to increase or decrease the pitch after the decarb? This in itself would give you an idea what is going on with your engine. I believe the max rpm for a 447 (depending on model) is 6800rpm. If you are hitting that in level flight I would say you are about pitched right for cruise. Do you recall what any of the engine temps were prior to decarb? If everything else is the same, than cooler running temps would indicate an engine that isnt having to work as hard to make the same power. I hope this helps Best Regards Carlos G. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=116216#116216 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: russ kinne <kinnepix(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: q
Date: Jun 03, 2007
List I'm sorry to see what looks like some unnecessary antagonism here -- specifically between USA and UK pilots. Come on! -- I for one haven't seen what I'd consider any "continual US-bashing", and I don't see any "continual Brit-bashing" either. And I hope I don't, and we don't need that!! -- or anything like that. I am interested in seeing how the Brit regs are different from the US ones -- and am indebted to Pat for supplying that info. Our regs are more lenient than theirs, and fuel prices lower too (how would you like $11/gallon?) but we should all be thankful for that, not make any accusations or cause our friends-across-the-Pond any discomfort. They're Friends! -- please try to remember that. Let's also remember to jump all over our elected politicians every time they're off-base about User Fees and whatever the next anti- aviation proposal is. If enough of us bitch a lot, they'll listen -- that's (supposed to be at least) how Democracy works. Been working for 231 years now and I sure hope it continues. But it won't, without Us Guys speaking up when we should. AOPA is doing a fine job for all of us here. Russ Kinne Kolb-related but no need to archive ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 03, 2007
From: "Robert Laird" <rlaird(at)cavediver.com>
Subject: Re:447 Thrust
You just gotta love Ed... a man of few words... ;-) -- Robert On 6/3/07, DAquaNut(at)aol.com wrote: > > > ************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com. > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: The FlagFly is sold.....
From: "Don G" <donghe@one-eleven.net>
Date: Jun 03, 2007
Thx a Mil Richard....I am sure he is a fine pilot, but transitioning from a DC-3 to a FireFly might be a little tricky! -------- Don G. Central Illinois Kitfox IV Speedster Luscombe 8A http://www.geocities.com/dagger369th/my_firefly.htm Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=116277#116277 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "George Bass" <gtb(at)commspeed.net>
Subject: Re: UK Regs
Date: Jun 03, 2007
The following was taken from a post in another group: ================ On the 30th of April the CAA issued an exemption, which allows single-seat microlights, having an empty weight of less than 115 Kg (approx. 254 lbs), & an empty wing loading of less than 10 Kg per square metre, to fly in the UK, without a permit to fly, design investigation, formal flight tests or annual inspections. The only requirement for the aeroplane is that it must have the appropriate level of 3rd party insurance, & a noise certificate, issued by the CAA, which may require a noise measurement flight test. Full details of this new class of aeroplane, & guidance on some of the designs already available will be found in the June 2007 issue of `Popular Flying', due out shortly. (10 KG = 22.046 lbs, & 1 square meter = 10.76391 square feet) [I think] Hope this helps in the understanding of the SIMILARITY between the UK & the US MICROLIGHT / ULTRALIGHT categories. George Bass ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "pat ladd" <pj.ladd(at)btinternet.com>
Subject: Re: English/American
Date: Jun 04, 2007
I'm not the only one here who finds your continued 'US-bashing' offensive>> Hi Ed, I think you must suffer from an exceptionaly thin skin. And so does at least one other listee who has written to me this morning apologising to me for the rudeness of his fellow American. At no time did I intentionally `US Bash`. and I think that I have always made it clear that I appreciate that we just approach things in a different way. Sure I would love to be able to load my Xtra up in the way John Hauk loads his or put a lovely streamlined cowl over the engine, but a few weeks ago the list was discussing cutting up planes instead of taking the risk of a law suit if the plane was sold and the buyer came to grief. Thats the other side of the `freedom ` coin. I have never argued about which is best. I just accept the fact. 2 people at MV said they liked my posts as they gave a different perpective. And the sympathetic posts which came in when I stupidly crunched my plane were magnificent.. Still you can`t please everyone and it would seem that the judicious use of your `delete` key would save a lot of bad temper. .. If no one is interested in the way things are done or what people are doing outside the USA, thats fine. Just let me know and I will stop commenting. I am always interested in the way things are done in other countries. In other countries than the USA too,( they do exist you know) and I assumed that othere were interested too. If I am wrong, well OK Cheers PAT ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: FIRE!!!!!
From: "ropermike" <ropermike2002(at)yahoo.com>
Date: Jun 04, 2007
Hello fellow Kolbers. I read your forum regularly and rarely have anything to contribute but I want to tell you what happened to me Saturday! I had just completed a two hr flight in my Mark II and went down to the local wallmart supercenter to fill my gas jugs up. I prefer to fill here because of the volume of gas they sell and i have never had a problem with it....I pulled up to the pump and filled my Pick up up first with diesel. Then I got my two plastic (Wallmart) 5 gal gas jugs out and set them between my truck and the pump, which was my first mistake. I will allways put the jugs as far from the pump and my truck as I can in the future, but I do like to be close enough to read the gallons on the pump as to not overfill the jugs...I put my "Mr Funnel" in the top of the first jug. I use a small bungee cord to hold the funnel upright while Im filling the jug.....I start filling the jug and have about two gallons inside when the funnel starts getting too full. This is a common problem because it is hard to pump the gas slow enough even though I have the big 5 gallon per minute "Mr Funnel"....I stop the nozzel for about 15 seconds to let the funnel catch up and when I squeeze the nozzel again the funnel just lights right up and begins BURNING!.....I stepped back and dropped the gas nozzel, and tried to believe my eyes!!! The funnel and gas jug was truely burning and the second jug had flames coming out the cap!.....This was happening about two feet away from my truck and about three feet away from the gas pump! I jumped in the truck and started it up and moved it away and then ran and told the pimple faced kid in the little office that I had a fire! I then ran back to the pump and the jugs were still burning but not nearly as bad as I thought they would. I expected an explosion any minute and was terrified that the fire was so close to the pump so I grabbed a windshield washer (thankfully this one was one of the longer kind) and I pushed the burning jugs about 20' away from the pump. About that time a gu! y that w as watching all this had found a fire extinguiser on the side of the building and ran up and snuffed the fire out!....Mistake # 2 was not having a fire extinguiser in my truck! Ofcourse your thinking there was a lot more than two mistakes commited so far in this crises arent you?...About that time the entire Columbia, Ms police and fire department arrived on the scene.......Well I can tell you for sure, I'm extremely Lucky! This could have turned into a huge fire and people could have been hurt!.............Thankfully I had heard that you need to put jugs on the ground to prevent static electricity even though it didnt in this case, it did save me from burning down my truck!.....I had a cell phone on my belt in a leather case but I didnt recieve any calls during this time. I will in the future leave the phone in the truck in case it was what caused the spark.....I think it was just static electricty even though the funnel is or was plastic. The fire cheif later told me not to use the funnel in the future and to stick the nozzel into the jug and fill it. The cheap plasic gas jugs were remarkable though! They just vented out the top and the fire never got out of hand even though the top half of the jug I was filling was gone by the time the fire was put out...I havnt decided how Im gonna fuel from now on. Suddenly, that extra 50 cents a gallon for 100LL doesnt seem so high!......Sorry this story was so long but I hope I might keep this from happening to someone else...For now, Im off to find that fire extinguisher......Mike -------- The next best thing to playing and winning is playing and losing!...Mike Hillger Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=116336#116336 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Larry Cottrell" <lcottrell(at)fmtcblue.com>
Subject: Re: FIRE!!!!!
Date: Jun 04, 2007
Subject: Kolb-List: FIRE!!!!! This is a com! > mon problem because it is hard to pump the gas slow enough even though I > have the big 5 gallon per minute "Mr Funnel"....I stop the nozzel for > about 15 seconds to let the funnel catch up and when I squeeze the nozzel > again the funnel just lights right up and begins BURNING You certainly did several things right- nobody was hurt. The problem was the "Mr. funnel". The gas hoses are grounded with a wire inside the rubber of the hose. The problem with filling tanks in the back of the trucks is that they are not grounded. Normally when filling a tank one tried to keep the metal of the nozzle in contact with the plastic jug. This keeps the grounded part of the nozzle in contact with the jug, no fire. If it is set on the ground you should have no problem. "Mr. funnel" circumvents the grounding, and the slow filtering also increases the static build up. I cannot remember for sure, but I have heard of a lot of fires when the Mr. funnel has been used. I personally think the possible benefits gained are far less than the hazards risked. Larry C,Oregon ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: FIRE!!!!!
From: "Ralph B" <ul15rhb(at)juno.com>
Date: Jun 04, 2007
I fill my red plastic red gas cans all the time at the pump and in my garage. I always transfer fuel with them on the cement and have never had a problem. During the winter months, I will ground my hand on the garage door railing to help discharge any static that might have built up. I think about this all the time as it could be tragic if they ever caught fire. Thanks for your post. Ralph -------- Ralph B Original Firestar 20 years flying it Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=116356#116356 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: No checkouts avail at TNK???
From: "Don G" <donghe@one-eleven.net>
Date: Jun 04, 2007
Gents, When I sold my Kolb to Steve Simmons in Eastern Tn, He nor I thought getting a him a checkride in a Kolb would be a problem, since he was an hour or so south of London and TNK co. To my great suprise he tells me now he called them and was told they no longer offer flight training or checkrides. Brother Pike has give the name of a local Ultralite instructor, but he is unable to do it right now. Can anyone help us with getting at least a familiarization flight?? An instructor would be good...but possibly a friendly ride with a Kolb pilot to talk about the Kolb characteristics would be enough. IF not a Kolb then Maybe even something light and close to a Kolb? Any kind of help would be appreciated. I have given him a written description of critical speeds and the flagfly's flight characteristics, but that of course is nothing like a ride. I certainly remember , after I got the plane finished, how I wanted a familiarization flight and John Hauck stopped by here on the way home from OshKosh 3 years ago and helped me out in this regard, and how I will always be indebted to him for that. At that time he saved me a long drive to London, (and maybe a bent gear leg or 2) But at this time even that option is not availbale to Steve Simmons, the Flagfly's new pilot. Anybody with any ideas please email me at donghe@one-eleven.net or Steve Simmons at : flightphoto(at)charter.net I certainly hope this is a temporary thing at TNK. It seems that manufactureing and selling aircraft without the ability to give the service of checkrides or demos would be quite a detriment to new plane sales...not to mention the effect on the resale of all of our existing aircraft -------- Don G. Central Illinois Kitfox IV Speedster Luscombe 8A http://www.geocities.com/dagger369th/my_firefly.htm Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=116357#116357 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: FIRE!!!!!
From: "ropermike" <ropermike2002(at)yahoo.com>
Date: Jun 04, 2007
> Normally when filling a tank one tried to keep the > metal of the nozzle in contact with the plastic jug. This keeps the grounded > part of the nozzle in contact with the jug, no fire. If it is set on the > ground you should have no problem. > > > So, is it possible to cause a spark pouring from one plastic fuel can thru the "Mr Funnel" into another on the ground? -------- The next best thing to playing and winning is playing and losing!...Mike Hillger Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=116364#116364 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: FIRE!!!!!
From: "ropermike" <ropermike2002(at)yahoo.com>
Date: Jun 04, 2007
So, is it possible to cause a spark pouring from one plastic fuel can thru the "Mr Funnel" into another on the ground? ........Sorry,this was my question, not part of the quote.. -------- The next best thing to playing and winning is playing and losing!...Mike Hillger Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=116365#116365 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Robert Laird" <rlaird(at)cavediver.com>
Subject: Re: FIRE!!!!!
Date: Jun 04, 2007
Mike -- >So, is it possible to cause a spark pouring from one plastic fuel can thru the >"Mr Funnel" into another on the ground? Yes. Static charges can build up on the surface of (usually hard) plastic containers and can jump from one to another. Keeping constant contact between all pieces involved is the safest method, eliminating the chance for static to be different on one part. My guess: When you stopped fueling and pulled the handle away, a differential in static developed between the fuel handle and the Mr. Funnel, so when you went to restart the pumping, static was discharged as the pump nozzle got close to the Mr. Funnel. If you had left the nozzle in contact with the Mr. Funnel while you waited for the Mr. Funnel to drain out, the fire would possibly have been avoided. Also note that only gasoline vapor is explosive... liquid gasoline will simply burn, as you witnessed. -- Robert <-----Original Message-----> >From: ropermike [ropermike2002(at)yahoo.com] >Sent: 6/4/2007 10:08:33 AM >To: kolb-list(at)matronics.com >Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Re: FIRE!!!!! > > >So, is it possible to cause a spark pouring from one plastic fuel can thru the >"Mr Funnel" into another on the ground? > > >.........Sorry,this was my question, not part of the quote.. > >-------- >The next best thing to playing and winning is playing and losing!...Mike Hillger > > >Read this topic online here: > >http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=116365#116365 > > >. > Mike --

>So, is it possible to cause a spark pouring from one plastic fuel can thru the
>"Mr Funnel" into another on the ground?

Yes. Static charges can build up on the surface of (usually hard) plastic containers and can jump from one to another. Keeping constant contact between all pieces involved is the safest method, eliminating the chance for static to be different on one part. My guess: When you stopped fueling and pulled the handle away, a differential in static developed between the fuel handle and the Mr. Funnel, so when you went to restart the pumping, static was discharged as the pump nozzle got close to the Mr. Funnel. If you had left the nozzle in contact with the Mr. Funnel while you waited for the Mr. Funnel to drain out, the fire would possibly have been avoided.

Also note that only gasoline vapor is explosive... liquid gasoline will simply burn, as you witnessed.

-- Robert


<-----Original Message----->
>From: ropermike [ropermike2002(at)yahoo.com]<br> >Sent: 6/4/2007 10:08:33 AM
>To: kolb-list(at)matronics.com
>Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Re: FIRE!!!!!
>
>--> Kolb-List message posted by: "ropermike" <ropermike2002(at)yahoo.com>
>
>So, is it possible to cause a spark pouring from one plastic fuel can thru the
>"Mr Funnel" into another on the ground?
>
>
>.........Sorry,this was my question, not part of the quote..
>
>--------
>The next best thing to playing and winning is playing and losing!...Mike Hillger
>
>
>
>
>Read this topic online here:
>
>http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=116365#116365> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>.
>

      
      
      
________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: FIRE!!!!!
From: "JetPilot" <orcabonita(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Jun 04, 2007
I fill up the same red plastic jugs also for my Kolb. Its amazing how static electricity could do that, but im guessing maybe the static built up durring filling and possibly sent a small discharge from the nozzle to the metal screen in the MR Funnel which could have started the fire ??? Understanding the possible causes of this could help others prevent this in the future.... Cellphones will not start a fire at a gas station, that is a wives tale that has been well covered on mythbusters, and also by statistics and science. There is no arcing or static buildup occuring anywhere in a cellphone, not even durring a call. The explanation lies somewhere else. Anyways, I think the fire cheif was on the right track, it seems like a good idea not to use the MR Funnel while fueling, and I will make sure I park far away from the plastic cans I am filling. Thanks for posting, it is something that I never worried about happening by simply filling a jug, but in the future I will be much more careful. Mike -------- "NO FEAR" - If you have no fear you did not go as fast as you could have !!! Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=116387#116387 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Blumax008(at)aol.com
Date: Jun 04, 2007
Subject: Re: FIRE!!!!!
This is a reply from one of the guys about the fire this dumb ass had. Basically he says...lose the fuckin' Mr. Funnel bullshit. In a message dated 6/4/2007 9:31:49 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, lcottrell(at)fmtcblue.com writes: You certainly did several things right- nobody was hurt. The problem was the "Mr. funnel". The gas hoses are grounded with a wire inside the rubber of the hose. The problem with filling tanks in the back of the trucks is that they are not grounded. Normally when filling a tank one tried to keep the metal of the nozzle in contact with the plastic jug. This keeps the grounded part of the nozzle in contact with the jug, no fire. If it is set on the ground you should have no problem. "Mr. funnel" circumvents the grounding, and the slow filtering also increases the static build up. I cannot remember for sure, but I have heard of a lot of fires when the Mr. funnel has been used. I personally think the possible benefits gained are far less than the hazards risked. ************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Blumax008(at)aol.com
Date: Jun 04, 2007
Subject: Re: After Market Crap...FIRE!
If I've said it once I've said it a thousand times...get rid of the crap. The after market crap everyone & their brother throws on the market of any sport appearing anywhere. Keep it simple. Believe me, with 30 years experience in the sport behind me, your little Rotax or whatever will not know the difference if you've slightly miscalculated the mixing procedure or even if you've gotten a bit of trash or water in the son of a bitch. That's what the in-line filter is designed to do. I've even run my 503 accidentally with NO oil for 5 gallons with no problems...just a little higher than normal temp. Just lose the crap like Mr. Funnel and all the rest of the unnecessary bullshit that they tell you that you can't live without! Better yet, don't buy the crap in the first place. I'd go so far as to tell you to lose that expensive stupid ass overpriced parachute that you never use. In 30 years I've done some pretty radical crap in ultralights & never had to use one. Not to mention the expense of having it repacked. "Don't drink, don't smoke, don't chase women, live an extra two years & die anyway!" Greatest bumper sticker I ever saw in my life. So what if you're wing falls off...we're all going to die in a few years anyway! SAVE YOUR MONEY! Spend it on liquor & women! Live a little with the time you've got left! Spend time in the air & not on the internet BUYING CRAP YOU'LL NEVER NEED OR USE! Get rid of the CRAP! You old timers like me out there will remember when you could ride your bicycle with nothing more on than a pair of cutoffs. If you fell off in the gravel & skinned the shit out of your knee it was your dumb ass luck & you learned a damn good lesson. Now you've got to have these stupid as hell looking crash helmets, special bicycling shorts & tops, special gloves & sunglasses, heart rate monitors, stopwatches etc. Anyone seen the latest idiots paddling Kayaks nowadays? You'd think they were on an around the world trip...non-stop! The most absolutely rediculous example of this was in the Virgin Islands when I actually witnessed a SCUBA diver DROWNING under the weight of all the crap he was trying to swim with! DON'T BUY THE CRAP IN THE FIRST PLACE... ************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "pat ladd" <pj.ladd(at)btinternet.com>
Subject: Re: English/American
Date: Jun 04, 2007
<> Hi Thom, a point I had never considered. I don`t know if its the same here. Your way sounds too much of a common sense approach for us. Its a problem I may have to face. Changes of pressure though scuba diving, the same with gliding and ul flying plus playing drums in a jazz band for a good many years have certainly taken its toll on my hearing according to Wendy.. WHAT DID YOU SAY DEAR? I am surprised about the non controlled airfields proportion in the States. We have this image that everything in the States is superbly oganised and efficient not like the bumbling, amateur English. I think most places even pretending to be an airfield here have someone on the ground answering radio calls. Probably not actually Controlling anything but giving landing info. Plenty of farm strips with just PPR only Of course we have only just started the Unicom system which you have had for years. Cheers Pat ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: English/American
Date: Jun 04, 2007
From: "Kirby Dennis Contr MDA/AL" <Dennis.Kirby(at)kirtland.af.mil>
<< Sorry to the List in general, but I'm not the only one here who finds your continued 'US-bashing' offensive. Our two countries have different ways to meet aircraft safety requirements ... Ed in JXN >> I did not interpret Pat's comparison of UK versus US aircraft cert rules as "US-Bashing." No where once did Pat suggest that their system in England is better than the way aircraft are certified in the United States. It was interesting to me to learn the differences, and makes me continue to appreciate the system (even with all its imperfections) and freedoms we have here in America when it comes to building & flying our homebuilts. Dennis Kirby Mark-III, 912ul, in Cedar Crest, NM ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "JAMES BEARD" <JAMESBEARD305(at)msn.com>
Subject: Our similar differences
Date: Jun 04, 2007
After reading todays posts, I'm a little confused.....BlueMax is on a blue streak.....fuel poured into a funnel "down under" is just going to fall right out of the cans anyway, unless they're held upside down.....and the americans and british are two peoples divided by a common language, apparently. Blue, I agree with what you say, but a little put off by the manner of speech. Pat, I 'ave the greatest respect for your insightful postings...carry on! ...and oh, mike, so glad you did not join the ranks of the "screaming Alpha" (sailor jargon for those ablaze).. God, I love this place!!! ......Jim and Jackalope (under destruction) in Az ________________________________________________________________________________
From: FS2Kolb(at)aol.com
Date: Jun 04, 2007
Subject: Re: FIRE!!!!!
Last year Bill Catalina, the Blue Max, was going to unsubscribe because we didn't put up with his adult words. Is this the same person? _http://www.flythecoast.com/_ (http://www.flythecoast.com/) In a message dated 6/4/2007 1:24:38 P.M. Mountain Daylight Time, flykolb(at)wowway.com writes: Right on Richard! I forwarded these to Matt. Let's see what happens. Jim ----- Original Message ----- From: _Richard Pike_ (mailto:richard(at)bcchapel.org) Sent: Monday, June 04, 2007 2:20 PM Subject: Re: Kolb-List: FIRE!!!!! Clean up your mouth. This list is not a haven for gratuitous vulgarity. Richard Pike MKIII N420P (420ldPoops) do not archive ************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: russ kinne <kinnepix(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: After Market Crap...FIRE!
Date: Jun 04, 2007
Blumax I really don't think any of the Kolb-ers need, or want, you superb advice on just about everything. Esp. with your choice of adjectives. How 'bout going away? Most sincerely, Russ Kinne On Jun 4, 2007, at 2:21 PM, Blumax008(at)aol.com wrote: > If I've said it once I've said it a thousand times...get rid of the > crap. The after market crap everyone & their brother throws on the > market of any sport appearing anywhere. Keep it simple. Believe me, > with 30 years experience in the sport behind me, your little Rotax > or whatever will not know the difference if you've slightly > miscalculated the mixing procedure or even if you've gotten a bit > of trash or water in the son of a bitch. That's what the in-line > filter is designed to do. > > I've even run my 503 accidentally with NO oil for 5 gallons with no > problems...just a little higher than normal temp. Just lose the > crap like Mr. Funnel and all the rest of the unnecessary bullshit > that they tell you that you can't live without! Better yet, don't > buy the crap in the first place. I'd go so far as to tell you to > lose that expensive stupid ass overpriced parachute that you never > use. In 30 years I've done some pretty radical crap in ultralights > & never had to use one. Not to mention the expense of having it > repacked. > > "Don't drink, don't smoke, don't chase women, live an extra two > years & die anyway!" Greatest bumper sticker I ever saw in my life. > So what if you're wing falls off...we're all going to die in a few > years anyway! SAVE YOUR MONEY! Spend it on liquor & women! Live a > little with the time you've got left! Spend time in the air & not > on the internet BUYING CRAP YOU'LL NEVER NEED OR USE! Get rid of > the CRAP! > > You old timers like me out there will remember when you could ride > your bicycle with nothing more on than a pair of cutoffs. If you > fell off in the gravel & skinned the shit out of your knee it was > your dumb ass luck & you learned a damn good lesson. Now you've got > to have these stupid as hell looking crash helmets, special > bicycling shorts & tops, special gloves & sunglasses, heart rate > monitors, stopwatches etc. Anyone seen the latest idiots paddling > Kayaks nowadays? You'd think they were on an around the world > trip...non-stop! > > The most absolutely rediculous example of this was in the Virgin > Islands when I actually witnessed a SCUBA diver DROWNING under the > weight of all the crap he was trying to swim with! > > DON'T BUY THE CRAP IN THE FIRST PLACE... > > > See what's free at AOL.com. > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Mike Welch" <mdnanwelch7(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Monument Valley
Date: Jun 04, 2007
Regarding MV, I would be willing to bet NO ONE came so close to going, but didn't than me!! As I have mentioned in the past, I am building a shop (for building airplanes) and a pool and 40 sq yards of RV parking at my new home in SW Utah. I am almost finished, and the afternnon of the 18th of May I was busy chasing around town looking for some special shaped flashing for my roofing crew that was showing up on the 19th to get started roofing my shop. I finally found the flashing at 5:00 Friday afternoon. After eating dinner and what-not I didn't finish my flight planning until 11:45 Friday night. I was whipped!! I then got up at 5:00 am, with intentions on going, but I was SO tired I couldn't see straight! I do not fly under these conditions....period. So, as it turns out, I was about as close to making it as anyone can get, but no ceegar!! And I probably live the closest, for crying out loud!!! So, it is with deep appreciation I salute those you that did make it to Monument Valley! I know many of you really went to a lot more trouble than I would have to to make it.....and you did!! I missed an easy opportunity to fly and meet a bunch of you nice people, and put it off until the last minute, and then couldn't make it. I even talked to Arty and Pat Ladd (on the phone) and told them I was planning on making it. I will be there next year, and I will be flying my plane (Kolb). Realizing I miissed out big time, Mike in SW Utah >From: "pat ladd" <pj.ladd(at)btinternet.com> >Reply-To: kolb-list(at)matronics.com _________________________________________________________________ PC Magazines 2007 editors choice for best Web mailaward-winning Windows Live Hotmail. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Mike Welch" <mdnanwelch7(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: English/American
Date: Jun 04, 2007
Not trying to disagree with anyone, or make things any worse, but from what I saw (read), Pat simply pointed out the "differences between the US and Great Brittain. I didn't get the feeling he was trying to show us up at all. In fact, if anything, I get the impression he felt we here in the US have it a little easier than they do in GB. Thanks for the patriotism, Ed, but I wasn't left with the impression that Pat was "disrespecting" us. Mike in SW Utah _________________________________________________________________ Need a break? Find your escape route with Live Search Maps. http://maps.live.com/default.aspx?ss=Restaurants~Hotels~Amusement%20Park&cp=33.832922~-117.915659&style=r&lvl=13&tilt=-90&dir=0&alt=-1000&scene=1118863&encType=1&FORM=MGAC01 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 04, 2007
From: possums <possums(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: fire!!!
At 10:22 PM 6/4/2007, you wrote: > > >Jim - > >You write that you fill your 6 gal. gas can at the gas >station and add oil, and later run the entire mixture >through Mr. Funnel. I've been told that the Mr. >Funnel manufacturer states that it works only with >gasoline - not with a gas-oil mixture. I can't find >the source. Anyone have any info about this? > >Arty Trost http://www.mrfunnel.com/Mr.%20Funnel/FAQ.html Q. Will the filter work on mixed fuel with 2-cycle oil in it? A. Yes, but if your 2-cycle oil has a detergent base the detergents can break down molecules of water and some water might pass the screen. Usually only a drop or two but if you are concerned, filter the fuel a second time because unless the sump is full of water, it is not possible that any water passed the filter. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Firestar for sale
From: "Richard Pike" <richard(at)bcchapel.org>
Date: Jun 04, 2007
A friend of mine is selling his Firestar, I have flown it and it is a nice little airplane, it has a good running 447 with 300 hours on it. I know the original builder, he did a good job on it. Somewhere during it's early life it suffered some leading edge damage on one wing, the L/E tube, and was properly repaired. It still has the original paint and fabric, has gone through a couple owners prior to it's present owner, and is presently looking a bit less than sharp, but I think it needs only cosmetics and being owned by someone who has dope/fabric skills and wants to take the trouble to spruce it up. If I did not have my MKIII, I would get it. Not sure if it can be made part 103 legal, it certainly flies like something that weighs less than 300 pounds. It does have hydraulic brakes. The BRS chute is out of currency and needs repacking but is included. It is located about fifteen miles south west of Johnson City, Tn. Asking price is $6,500.00 Contact Sherrill Phillips 423-257-3280 423-737-7317 Richard Pike MKIII N420P (420ldPoops) PS - tried to post this ad earlier and messed something up. Hope it doesn't end up getting posted twice... sigh Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=116568#116568 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/dcp_1085_large_101.jpg http://forums.matronics.com//files/dcp_1090_large_504.jpg http://forums.matronics.com//files/dcp_1095_large_741.jpg http://forums.matronics.com//files/dcp_1098_large_146.jpg http://forums.matronics.com//files/dcp_1104_large_190.jpg http://forums.matronics.com//files/dcp_1105_large_448.jpg ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "pat ladd" <pj.ladd(at)btinternet.com>
Subject: Re: UK Regs
Date: Jun 05, 2007
On the 30th of April the CAA issued an exemption,>> Hi George, that looks like the same stuff that I was referring to but I [picked it up from another source. Incidentally, do you have to have a Noise Certificate in the US.? I bet you don`t Pat ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "pat ladd" <pj.ladd(at)btinternet.com>
Subject: Re: Monument Valley
Date: Jun 05, 2007
NO ONE came so close to going,>> Hi Mike Good try. Hard luck. Sounds as though the fact that we only made contact over the phone was a plus. If I had been able to actually call you wouldn`t have got even close to going to MV. I had no idea that when I rang you, beer in hand, from the quiet of a log cabin in Zion Canyon, that you were rushing round like the proverbial blue assed fly trying to get ready to fly. You will have the opportunity to make it next year, take it. . I, unfortunately will not. Maybe in a couple of years I might make Homers fly in. Something to look forward to. Cheers Pat. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 05, 2007
From: Dana Hague <d-m-hague(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: UK Regs
At 06:00 AM 6/5/2007, pat ladd wrote: > >that looks like the same stuff that I was referring to but I [picked it up >from another source. > >Incidentally, do you have to have a Noise Certificate in the US.? I bet >you don`t I'm guessing that your exemption is similar to the "foot launch exemption" that your PPG and PHG guys have been operating under for years now? Nope, no noise certificate required here. No minimum altitude, either, under Part 103 :) ... though an ultralight can't fly over any "congested area" at ANY altitude. -Dana -- -- Most politicians aren't crooks, but the ones that are sure are making the other 10 percent look bad. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "pat ladd" <pj.ladd(at)btinternet.com>
Subject: Re: UK Regs
Date: Jun 05, 2007
'm guessing that your exemption is similar to the "foot launch exemption" that your PPG and PHG guys have been operating under for years now? Nope, no noise certificate required here. No minimum altitude, either, under Part 103 :) ... though an ultralight can't fly over any "congested area" at ANY altitude.>> Hi Dana, I wouldn`t know about that. I turned my back firmly against any `foot launching` after breaking my leg hang gliding many years ago. This Single Seat Deregulation is a whole new ball game for us and as I am not going to change my Xtra in for a singhle seater I have not been following the details. Re noise cert. A new type of plane or new plane /engine combination HAS to have a noise test carried out.This certification then applies to all similar set ups. As the new SSDereg. is expected to produce a series of different planes/combinations a Noise Cert. will have to be issued to each one. We think our noise levels are difficult to get down to but the Germans rules are a lot tougher. We have no lower height limit except the usual `congested area` rule. Some countries, Holland I think, have maximum height rules, some have minimum height rules. It is a mess which is gradually being sorted out now that we are all members of the European Union. (Oh Yeah!) Basically we operate under exactly the same rules as GA which seems pretty sensible to me. Why complicate things? Pat ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: FIRE!!!!!
From: "ropermike" <ropermike2002(at)yahoo.com>
Date: Jun 05, 2007
Thanks for all your advice, well, allmost all of it!....I have decided that I will buy me another "Mr Funnel" and keep filling the way I'm filling now except I will make a simple ground wire with three clamps and connect the nozzel handle, jug, and funnel before I start. I will also have a fire extinguisher handy..........As for Blumax, I dont appreciate being called a dumbass but I'm not gonna lose any sleep over it! Since your into bumperstickers, I've got one for you and it fits you perfectlly! Jesus loves you! But everyone else thinks your an ASSHOLE! -------- The next best thing to playing and winning is playing and losing!...Mike Hillger Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=116609#116609 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: FIRE!!!!!
From: "David Lucas" <d_a_lucas(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Jun 05, 2007
Re grounding and sparks, I can recall a briefing some years back where the lecturer told us that when you fill your car at the gas station as you put the nozzle into the filler point that more often than not a small spark is created as the two items come together. The saving grace is that; A) the spark is very weak and B) the fumes in the nozzle area are too rich for the fuel to ignite. Technicaly speaking each vehicle should be grounded with a ground wire to Earth and the Pump before refueling starts but from a practical point of view nobody would do it and the risk is so small it is accepted. Sobering thought eh ? David. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=116618#116618 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: After Market Crap...FIRE!
From: "olendorf" <olendorf(at)gmail.com>
Date: Jun 05, 2007
Russ says "BlumaxI really don't think any of the Kolb-ers need, or want, you superb advice on just about everything. Esp. with your choice of adjectives. How 'bout going away?" Bluemax, I kinda liked it. [Laughing] -------- Scott Olendorf Original Firestar, Rotax 447, Powerfin prop Schenectady, NY http://KolbFirestar.googlepages.com Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=116622#116622 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: WillUribe(at)aol.com
Date: Jun 05, 2007
Subject: Re: FIRE!!!!!
_Click here: YouTube - Gas Station Fire With Rescue_ (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JvSr7vyXXo4) Hi Mike, Happy to hear no harm was done, unlike the man on this video. Regards, Will Uribe El Paso, TX FireStar II N4GU -----Original Message----- From: owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of ropermike Sent: Monday, June 04, 2007 7:07 AM Subject: Kolb-List: FIRE!!!!! Hello fellow Kolbers. I read your forum regularly and rarely have anything to contribute but I want to tell you what happened to me Saturday! ************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: FIRE!!!!!
From: "olendorf" <olendorf(at)gmail.com>
Date: Jun 05, 2007
I saw a guy pouring from a red plastic gas can into his Minimax and it caught on fire. The guy had the sense to put the gas cap back on his airplane tank really fast and no more fire. I was impressed. -------- Scott Olendorf Original Firestar, Rotax 447, Powerfin prop Schenectady, NY http://KolbFirestar.googlepages.com Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=116625#116625 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: russ kinne <kinnepix(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: FIRE!!!!!
Date: Jun 05, 2007
RIGHT ON , ROPERMIKE !! On Jun 5, 2007, at 7:53 AM, ropermike wrote: > > Thanks for all your advice, well, allmost all of it!....I have > decided that I will buy me another "Mr Funnel" and keep filling the > way I'm filling now except I will make a simple ground wire with > three clamps and connect the nozzel handle, jug, and funnel before > I start. I will also have a fire extinguisher handy..........As for > Blumax, I dont appreciate being called a dumbass but I'm not gonna > lose any sleep over it! Since your into bumperstickers, I've got > one for you and it fits you perfectlly! Jesus loves you! But > everyone else thinks your an ASSHOLE! > > -------- > The next best thing to playing and winning is playing and > losing!...Mike Hillger > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=116609#116609 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: MV2007
Date: Jun 05, 2007
Morning Gang: A few photos of my recent flight to MV2007 and beyond. I'll try to do a couple a day to give you some idea of the flight. Steven Green, mkIII, just west of Russellville, AR, where we spent the night in the FBO, which was opened up for us to use, plus the courtesy car. In the back ground is a nuclear power plant. Gives one some idea of how large the plant is compared to an aircraft with a 30 foot wing span. http://home.elmore.rr.com/jhauck/MV2007/%20_001.JPG My early morning flight at MV: http://home.elmore.rr.com/jhauck/MV2007/%20_015.JPG Got to have an early morning silhouette: http://home.elmore.rr.com/jhauck/MV2007/%20_031.JPG Lake Powell from a Kolb: http://home.elmore.rr.com/jhauck/MV2007/%20_045.JPG Interesting rock formations in Southern Utah or Northern Arizona: http://home.elmore.rr.com/jhauck/MV2007/%20_051.JPG Bonneville Salt Flats, Utah, is rather salty: http://home.elmore.rr.com/jhauck/MV2007/%20_068.JPG The Kolbra and mkIII resting near the black line, Bonneville: http://home.elmore.rr.com/jhauck/MV2007/%20_070.JPG John Williamson and the Kolbra on short, short final, McDermott, Oregon: http://home.elmore.rr.com/jhauck/MV2007/%20_087.JPG A quick stop off at the Alvord Dessert prior to arrival at the Rock House: http://home.elmore.rr.com/jhauck/MV2007/%20_098.JPG Fun flying on the Alvord: http://home.elmore.rr.com/jhauck/MV2007/%20_112.JPG John W flying the Owyhee River Canyon: http://home.elmore.rr.com/jhauck/MV2007/%20_116.JPG John W taking off from the Owyhee Reservoir State Airport, Oregon: http://home.elmore.rr.com/jhauck/MV2007/%20_137.JPG Flying from the Rock House over to Rome, OR, for fuel, auto fuel that is: http://home.elmore.rr.com/jhauck/MV2007/%20_146.JPG Fill'er up: http://home.elmore.rr.com/jhauck/MV2007/%20_147.JPG Ha! I beat the 18 wheeler to the gas pump: http://home.elmore.rr.com/jhauck/MV2007/%20_148.JPG Three musketeers on the Alvord, John W, Larry C, and Miss P'fer: http://home.elmore.rr.com/jhauck/MV2007/%20_151.JPG Home of Larry and Karen Cottrell, the Rock House in SE Oregon dessert: http://home.elmore.rr.com/jhauck/MV2007/%20_160.JPG I theenk I got mooned. Three of the four musketeers, now includes Roger Hankins, Grants Pass, OR: http://home.elmore.rr.com/jhauck/MV2007/%20_169.JPG http://home.elmore.rr.com/jhauck/MV2007/%20_172.JPG Miss P'fer (P fer plane) got fancy with her foot work. Can you figure it out? http://home.elmore.rr.com/jhauck/MV2007/%20_177.JPG Larry and Roger on the Alvord: http://home.elmore.rr.com/jhauck/MV2007/%20_186.JPG High plains and snow just west of Jack Pot, Nevada: http://home.elmore.rr.com/jhauck/MV2007/%20_197.JPG Jack Pot airport and the casinos. Catus Pete's owned the RV park and their casino was right next to the parking pad and gas pump. Had lunch here in the casino. Was reasonable and excellent: http://home.elmore.rr.com/jhauck/MV2007/%20_198.JPG Great Salt Lake, UT: http://home.elmore.rr.com/jhauck/MV2007/%20_206.JPG Walden, Colorado, where I spent the first night on the way home to Alabama. Condensation from my breath froze on the inside of my tent that night. Elevation was 8,250 feet ASL: http://home.elmore.rr.com/jhauck/MV2007/%20_220.JPG Beautiful, peaceful morning in NW Arkansas, my last morning of four on the way home to Alabama. I departed Neosho, MO, at 0610 that morning, a record for me and Miss P'fer: http://home.elmore.rr.com/jhauck/MV2007/%20_222.JPG Rice paddies in Mississippi. This photo was shot for Jim Hefner's wife who misses trees, water, and rice paddies: http://home.elmore.rr.com/jhauck/MV2007/%20_227.JPG You know you are getting near home when you cross the mighty Mississippi. This particular tow is pushing 27 barges. That is a big'un: http://home.elmore.rr.com/jhauck/MV2007/%20_229.JPG Well, I fooled myself and completed the flight in one sitting. Hope you enjoy looking at the photos as much as I enjoyed my flight. john h mkIII ________________________________________________________________________________
From: WhiskeyVictor36(at)aol.com
Date: Jun 05, 2007
Subject: Re: MV2007
In a message dated 6/5/2007 12:15:11 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com writes: Miss P'fer (P fer plane) got fancy with her foot work. Can you figure it out? http://home.elmore.rr.com/jhauck/MV2007/%20_177.JPG Yeah John, I got it figured. I think! You came forward using the left set of tracks, made a sharp turn to the right, probably using your right brake to help. The left wheel continued in a nice arc, while the right wheel stayed still, even going backwards a foot or two, then all wheels going away and curving to the right to your final parking position. Was I right? Some beautiful pictures you have there. Thanks for sharing. Bill Varnes Original Kolb FireStar Audubon NJ Do Not Archive ************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Larry Cottrell" <lcottrell(at)fmtcblue.com>
Subject: Re: MV2007
Date: Jun 05, 2007
----- Original Message ----- From: WhiskeyVictor36(at)aol.com To: kolb-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2007 6:37 PM Subject: Re: Kolb-List: MV2007 In a message dated 6/5/2007 12:15:11 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com writes: Miss P'fer (P fer plane) got fancy with her foot work. Can you figure it out? http://home.elmore.rr.com/jhauck/MV2007/%20_177.JPG Yeah John, I got it figured. I think! Bill, Take a close look at the video that I took of John landing and you see how it is made. Larry C http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8252079461989792144 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Mark Shimei" <mshimei(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: Wings needed
Date: Jun 06, 2007
Thanks to the kind people that have e-mailed me. I am still looking for someone closer to Florida with a set of Ultrastar wings(or the whole plane less eng).I have determined that the early firestar wings will be a little too heavy. Got the chance to talk to Ellery, George Alexander, Tim Cowan, and Jeremy Casey. What a great bunch of people!! Mark ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 06, 2007
From: Terry <tkrolfe(at)usadatanet.net>
Subject: Fly-in to Homer's
Gentlemen, Latest update to the list of those going to Homer's on the 16th. I will be contacting Homer tomorrow with a count. Again for those flying there: Co-ordinates: N 40 deg 09' 36.3" Also you can check, Airnav.com for more information. W 075 deg 32' 46.6" John Hauck gave the address for those driving there, so you should be able to look it up on a mapping program. "Add your name if it's not listed". Please let me know if you have a change of plans! Those that said they are coming: Gene Zimmerman John Hauck Wilmer Zimmerman John Murr Earl Zimmerman Eddy Zimmerman Luray Weachter Steve Green Ron - from Arizona? Thom Riddle Bob Bean Chuck Davis George Alexander Bill Varnes Alan Mancus Scott Olendorf Dave Kulp Dan Walter Rick Kelbon Bob Bennethum John Donato & Me Terry - Firefly #95 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: FIRE!!!!!
From: "JetPilot" <orcabonita(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Jun 06, 2007
olendorf wrote: > I saw a guy pouring from a red plastic gas can into his Minimax and it caught on fire. The guy had the sense to put the gas cap back on his airplane tank really fast and no more fire. I was impressed. I have never heard of an airplane catching fire because of fueling with plastic gas cans. Was he doing something strange, or did you see anything that might have caused this to happen ? Mike -------- "NO FEAR" - If you have no fear you did not go as fast as you could have !!! Kolb MK-III Xtra, 912-S Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=116877#116877 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Looking for MV photos of Drifters departing
From: "JetPilot" <orcabonita(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Jun 06, 2007
Follow this link for the pictures of the out of control drifter: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?t=27642 There is also a story to read there. It seems strange your friend did not want the video, it was offered to him. If I had that close a call, I would at least want a good video for my trouble :) Mike -------- "NO FEAR" - If you have no fear you did not go as fast as you could have !!! Kolb MK-III Xtra, 912-S Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=116879#116879 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: WhiskeyVictor36(at)aol.com
Date: Jun 06, 2007
Subject: Re: MV2007
In a message dated 6/5/2007 11:21:59 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, lcottrell(at)fmtcblue.com writes: Take a close look at the video that I took of John landing and you see how it is made Larry, Thanks for that video. That's about how I envisioned him doing it, but with a little bit more Hot Rodding than I thought. Bill Varnes Original Kolb FireStar Audubon NJ Do Not Archive ************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: FIRE!!!!!
From: "olendorf" <olendorf(at)gmail.com>
Date: Jun 06, 2007
He was just standing there pouring it in. Plane and pilot were standing on grass. I'm pretty sure he wasn't using a funnel. After that I always make sure my spout is in contact with the plane while pouring. I also keep my body in contact with the plane as well. -------- Scott Olendorf Original Firestar, Rotax 447, Powerfin prop Schenectady, NY http://KolbFirestar.googlepages.com Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=116910#116910 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 06, 2007
From: Charlie England <ceengland(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: FIRE!!!!!
JetPilot wrote: > > > olendorf wrote: >> I saw a guy pouring from a red plastic gas can into his Minimax and it caught on fire. The guy had the sense to put the gas cap back on his airplane tank really fast and no more fire. I was impressed. > > > I have never heard of an airplane catching fire because of fueling with plastic gas cans. Was he doing something strange, or did you see anything that might have caused this to happen ? > > Mike Happened to a friend of mine who flies a rotary powered RV-6. I can send you his email account of what happened, if you like. He stopped the fire with the same techniques mentioned by others: cap the fuel tank on the plane & put out the fire in the gas can with an extinguisher. He won't use auto fuel any more; fuels only from avgas pumps now. On the other hand, millions of people fuel boats, cars, lawnmowers, planes, etc from plastic cans every day with no problems. About a dozen people had car wrecks within 20 miles of each one of us today. Anyone plan to stop driving? :-) Charlie ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Larry Cottrell" <lcottrell(at)fmtcblue.com>
Subject: Re: FIRE!!!!!
Date: Jun 06, 2007
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2007 2:08 PM Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Re: FIRE!!!!! > > JetPilot wrote: >> >> >> olendorf wrote: >>> I saw a guy pouring from a red plastic gas can into his Minimax and it >>> caught on fire. The guy had the sense to put the gas cap back on his >>> airplane tank really fast and no more fire. I was impressed. The thing to remember is that you should always have a ground when fueling your plane. If you insist on using a Mr Funnel, the ground should be connected to each of the componets of the process, if not then you are at risk. The fluid passing through the plastic openings build up static electricity. I use a gascolator to prevent water building up in my tanks, I also draw from the bottom of the fuel tank, so any water in the system will be passed on to the gascolator. I have not yet ever found any in any of my tanks. Of course it is so dry here that spitting could be a problem. I transfer fuel to my plane using a siphon tube from a 5 gal gas can sitting on the wing. I always make sure that the tube is touching both tanks and so far have not had any problem. Hopefully this will always be so. Larry C ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 06, 2007
From: "Carl Radcliffe" <crad238(at)verizon.net>
Subject: Re: FIRE!!!!!
Have been lurking on the list for several years. I am a 40 some year veteran in chemical manufacturing. It is well known that the pumping and pouring of a dielectric fluid (non conducting) can build up tremendous static charges. Great pains are taken to ground all sections of the system. Pouring/ pumping such a fluid into a plastic container always entails some risk. Grounding of non conductive plastic containers is recommended but not terribly effective. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Larry Cottrell" <lcottrell(at)fmtcblue.com>
Subject: Re: FIRE!!!!!
Date: Jun 06, 2007
----- Original Message ----- From: "Carl Radcliffe" <crad238(at)verizon.net> . It is well > known that the pumping and pouring of a dielectric fluid (non conducting) > can build up tremendous static charges. Great pains are taken to ground > all sections of the system. > Pouring/ pumping such a fluid into a plastic container always entails > some risk. > Grounding of non conductive plastic containers is recommended but not > terribly effective. Carl, It is also known that static releases occur when two surfaces containing a static charge gets close enough for the charge to bridge the gap. It would also follow that if there was no gap, there should be no release or spark jump. It is my belief that by its construction and function that the Mr Funnel causes a bit more of the static buildup than just pouring it into a plastic gas container, so therefore if one insists on using it he would be better off making sure that all of the components are at least grounded to each other. Even if you do not use a Mr Funnel you should endeavor to maintain contact between the receptacle and pouring spout. Terribly effective or not. Larry C ________________________________________________________________________________
From: russ kinne <kinnepix(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: FIRE!!!!!
Date: Jun 07, 2007
I've fueled from plastic cans many many times (hi-wing Cessna), in Canada & when on floats. Never had a problem, thankfully. Only thing I do, if I can, is hold spout closed with a fingertip until it's in the tank neck and in contact. Mainly to avoid spilling. 'Cans' are apparently non-conducting plastic, marked "UL Classified" Some are 'approved by the LAFD'. On Jun 6, 2007, at 11:32 AM, JetPilot wrote: > > > olendorf wrote: >> I saw a guy pouring from a red plastic gas can into his Minimax >> and it caught on fire. The guy had the sense to put the gas cap >> back on his airplane tank really fast and no more fire. I was >> impressed. > > > I have never heard of an airplane catching fire because of fueling > with plastic gas cans. Was he doing something strange, or did you > see anything that might have caused this to happen ? > > Mike > > -------- > "NO FEAR" - If you have no fear you did not go as fast > as you could have !!! > > Kolb MK-III Xtra, 912-S > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=116877#116877 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 07, 2007
From: Terry <tkrolfe(at)usadatanet.net>
Subject: Fly-in
Dear Clara & Homer, Thought it might be time to let you know how many are planning on coming on the 16th. This list does not include some "maybe's" like Dick Kuntzleman. Looks like a nice big group, but of course there will be some no show's I'm sure as usual. I figure somewhere between 22 and 24. Looking forward to another fine day visiting you folks and please do not go too far out of your way to accommodate us! Hoping for good weather and not have the day spoiled! Those that said they are coming: John Hauck Jim Hauck Gene Zimmerman Wilmer Zimmerman John Murr Earl Zimmerman Eddy Zimmerman Luray Weachter Steve Green Ron - from Arizona? Thom Riddle Bob Bean Chuck Davis George Alexander Bill Varnes Alan Mancus Scott Olendorf Dave Kulp Dan Walter Rick Kelbon Bob Bennethum John Donato John W. & Me Terry - Firefly #95 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "David Kulp" <undoctor(at)rcn.com>
Subject: Re: Re: Fly-in to Homer's
Date: Jun 07, 2007
Does anyone know what time the fly-in starts? Dave Kulp ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 07, 2007
From: Terry <tkrolfe(at)usadatanet.net>
Subject: Re: Re: Fly-in to Homer's
David Kulp wrote: > Does anyone know what time the fly-in starts? > > Dave Kulp Dave, There no official time! Come sometime in the morning, not real early, but make sure your there before lunch. Clara and family is going to prepare a picnic lunch as usual and that is when introductions are made and pictures taken. Leave when you have to. Most will depart sometime in the afternoon. See you there! Terry - FireFly #95 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: FIRE!!!!!
From: "lcottrell" <lcottrell(at)fmtcblue.com>
Date: Jun 07, 2007
----- Original Message ----- From: "Carl Radcliffe" . It is well > known that the pumping and pouring of a dielectric fluid (non conducting) > can build up tremendous static charges. Great pains are taken to ground > all sections of the system. > Pouring/ pumping such a fluid into a plastic container always entails > some risk. > Grounding of non conductive plastic containers is recommended but not > terribly effective. Carl, It is also known that static releases occur when two surfaces containing a static charge gets close enough for the charge to bridge the gap. It would also follow that if there was no gap, there should be no release or spark jump. It is my belief that by its construction and function that the Mr Funnel causes a bit more of the static buildup than just pouring it into a plastic gas container, so therefore if one insists on using it he would be better off making sure that all of the components are at least grounded to each other. Even if you do not use a Mr Funnel you should endeavor to maintain contact between the receptacle and pouring spout. Terribly effective or not. Larry C I posted this yesterday. It showed up on the regular list where we get each message, but not on this one. Oh by the way, it was not meant to be nasty, frustrated perhaps, but definately not nasty. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=117153#117153 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: robert bean <slyck(at)frontiernet.net>
Subject: finished doors
Date: Jun 07, 2007
It was a lot of work but I'm happy with the result. They open wider than I have shown here. Excellent entrance quality. Maybe next year some engine/radiator fairings but not as fancy as uncle Craig's. Time now for flying, not fixing. BB DSCN1160.JPG DSCN1164.JPG

      
      
      
________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: FIRE!!!!!
From: "ropermike" <ropermike2002(at)yahoo.com>
Date: Jun 07, 2007
I must tell you all, I was looking in the CPS catalog. The Mr Funnel description says that the funnel must be grounded while pouring fuel in it to prevent sparks and fires! Maybe I do deserve to be called a dumbass! I will use the grounding strap from now on...Mike -------- The next best thing to playing and winning is playing and losing!...Mike Hillger Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=117187#117187 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "David Key" <dhkey(at)msn.com>
Subject: Re: FIRE from Carbon
Date: Jun 08, 2007
I'm not sure if this has been mentioned, the plastic has carbon in it. http://www.ultralightnews.ca/ultralightstore/mrfunnel.htm 1. Carbon powder is injected into the Mr. Funnel plastic so that Mr. Funnel will conduct static electricity (not applicable to colored F1Cs). Grounding is an important safety feature. Always ground Mr. Funnel by Smart Tech. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "boyd" <by0ung(at)brigham.net>
Subject: Re: FIRE!!!!!
Date: Jun 08, 2007
>>>>>>>>>>> I've fueled from plastic cans many many times (hi-wing Cessna), in Canada & when on floats. Never had a problem, thankfully. Only thing I do, if I can, is hold spout closed with a fingertip until it's in the tank neck and in contact. Mainly to avoid spilling. 'Cans' are apparently non-conducting plastic, marked "UL Classified" Some are 'approved by the LAFD'.>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Don't know if it makes any difference or not..... I have been told that when transferring gas from a plastic container,,,, if you can keep the gas from traveling through open air,,, the static buildup will be less.... Therefore I have glued a long clear plastic hose to the end of the spout on my plastic tank.... by putting the end of the clear plastic hose into the bottom of the receiving tank, the gas does not pass through the air,,, also while pouring I grab the bare aluminum of the plane with my left hand while holding the plastic can on my right shoulder and holding it with my right hand... this is in an attempt to keep the tank and plane at somewhat the same electrical potential. The fuel tank in the plane is grounded to the frame. Boyd ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Carb Balance / Sync
From: "Roger Lee" <ssadiver1(at)yahoo.com>
Date: Jun 08, 2007
Hi all, Had a nice gentleman come over form Silver City to get a carb sync. He had about 200hrs. on his 912uls. He said he thought it was running ok. Bottom line is his carbs were not only out of mechanical sync because of uneven cable set, but the pneumatic sync was out 4" of vacumm. Moral of this story: it doesn't have to feel or sound bad. carbs do get out of sync and if you have never synced them, then they are out of sync. period. This makes one side work against the other at different rpms. There is no arguement here it's just a fact. A manual sync is not a fix or a replacement and they need to be pneumatically synced, the engine needs both. Everyone I know that does their sync evey 100 hrs. always finds the sync out some. Some more than others. This is so easy to do I have a hard time figuring out why some are so resistant to do this required function. I have yet to hook up a set of gages and find the carbs in perfect sync after some amount of run time on any 912. The carb system is a linked system with different components and any one of those can and do change from time to time. I would be happy to talk anyone through this if they would like to learn. Roger Lee Tucson,Az 520-574-1080 -------- Roger Lee Tucson, Az. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=117304#117304 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Russ Kinne <russ(at)rkiphoto.com>
Subject: Re: FIRE!!!!!
Date: Jun 08, 2007
Would be interested to see if the carbon-including plastic in a Mr. Funnel is conductive . Can anyone with a funnel and a VOM check this? The rubber in today's tires contains carbon and is conducting. Long ago gas-station people would sometimes get a shock from a car that's just driven in . All tank-trucks had a grounding chain trailing on the ground . Not needed nowadays. Grounding never hurts. How many of you carry a fire-extinguisher in your aircraft? When flames start is NO time to go looking for one. On Jun 7, 2007, at 6:16 PM, lcottrell wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Carl Radcliffe" > . It is well >> known that the pumping and pouring of a dielectric fluid (non >> conducting) >> can build up tremendous static charges. Great pains are taken to >> ground >> all sections of the system. >> Pouring/ pumping such a fluid into a plastic container always >> entails >> some risk. >> Grounding of non conductive plastic containers is recommended >> but not >> terribly effective. > > > Carl, > It is also known that static releases occur when two surfaces > containing > a static charge gets close enough for the charge to bridge the gap. > It would > also follow that if there was no gap, there should be no release or > spark > jump. It is my belief that by its construction and function that > the Mr > Funnel causes a bit more of the static buildup than just pouring it > into a > plastic gas container, so therefore if one insists on using it he > would be > better off making sure that all of the components are at least > grounded to > each other. Even if you do not use a Mr Funnel you should endeavor to > maintain contact between the receptacle and pouring spout. Terribly > effective or not. > Larry C > > > I posted this yesterday. It showed up on the regular list where we > get each message, but not on this one. Oh by the way, it was not > meant to be nasty, frustrated perhaps, but definately not nasty. > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=117153#117153 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: GeoR38(at)aol.com
Date: Jun 08, 2007
Subject: Re: FIRE!!!!!
In a message dated 6/6/2007 4:11:20 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, ceengland(at)bellsouth.net writes: JetPilot wrote: > > > olendorf wrote: >> I saw a guy pouring from a red plastic gas can into his Minimax and it caught on fire. The guy had the sense to put the gas cap back on his airplane tank really fast and no more fire. I was impressed. > > > I have never heard of an airplane catching fire because of fueling with plastic gas cans. Was he doing something strange, or did you see anything that might have caused this to happen ? > > Mike Happened to a friend of mine who flies a rotary powered RV-6. I can send you his email account of what happened, if you like. He stopped the fire with the same techniques mentioned by others: cap the fuel tank on the plane & put out the fire in the gas can with an extinguisher. He won't use auto fuel any more; fuels only from avgas pumps now. On the other hand, millions of people fuel boats, cars, lawnmowers, planes, etc from plastic cans every day with no problems. About a dozen people had car wrecks within 20 miles of each one of us today. Anyone plan to stop driving? :-) Charlie One thing that has not been mentioned in the dialog about static sparks is that one of the conditions for this to happen is a low humidity day. The drier the surrounding air, the more support for the generation of a spark from the storage point,namely the nonconductive plastic. That is where the charge is stored...or on your clothing or some other nonconducting medium. When the humidity is higher, the charge can be siphoned off or conducted off into the air better thereby eliminating the charge in the first place. My recommendation is to be MORE careful during dry days, as that is when the likelyhood of a spark is greatest. Touching (not rubbing) with your hand all plastic surfaces will also minimize the possibility of a spark. George Randolph firestar driver from the Villages, Fl ************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: GeoR38(at)aol.com
Date: Jun 08, 2007
Subject: Re: FIRE from Carbon
In a message dated 6/8/2007 8:08:09 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, dhkey(at)msn.com writes: I'm not sure if this has been mentioned, the plastic has carbon in it. http://www.ultralightnews.ca/ultralightstore/mrfunnel.htm 1. Carbon powder is injected into the Mr. Funnel plastic so that Mr. Funnel will conduct static electricity (not applicable to colored F1Cs). Grounding is an important safety feature. Always ground Mr. Funnel by Smart Tech. Now that makes a whole lot of sense,, thereby rendering M ************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: GeoR38(at)aol.com
Date: Jun 08, 2007
Subject: Re: FIRE from Carbon
In a message dated 6/8/2007 8:08:09 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, dhkey(at)msn.com writes: I'm not sure if this has been mentioned, the plastic has carbon in it. http://www.ultralightnews.ca/ultralightstore/mrfunnel.htm 1. Carbon powder is injected into the Mr. Funnel plastic so that Mr. Funnel will conduct static electricity (not applicable to colored F1Cs). Grounding is an important safety feature. Always ground Mr. Funnel by Smart Tech. Now that makes a whole lot of sense, causing grounding of the Mr Funnel to be HIGHLY EFFECTIVE as it will now CONDUCT electricity instead of only storing it like uncarbonized plastic..... such as our 5 and 6 gal red plastic containers. It seems that they too, should be carbonized.........why aren't they? Of course this would make Grounding HIGHLY EFFECTIVE instead of possibly effective. George Randolph Firestar driver from The Villages ************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "boyd" <by0ung(at)brigham.net>
Subject: Re: FIRE!!!!!
Date: Jun 09, 2007
Long ago gas-station people would sometimes get a shock from a car that's just driven in . All tank-trucks had a grounding chain trailing on the ground . Not needed nowadays. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was able to go for a ride with a shirt tail relative / friend,,, in a tanker hauling gas..... and the elimination of the grounding chain has more to do with sophisticated electronics that has been added to the trucks and trailers. Even higher performance aircraft will have static whips added to help reduce static buildup in the airframe. Boyd ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: FIRE from Carbon
From: "JetPilot" <orcabonita(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Jun 10, 2007
The carbon in the MR Funnel is good and bad... If you ground it, it will not build up a static charge, and that is great. If you do not ground the MR Funnel, it will be much more likely have the same static charge that your red plastic gas jug has and to spark to a metal filling nozzle at the gas station. As posted in the first thread about the fire, if there is metal ( or carbon ) for a metal nozzle to spark to, you are more likely to get a nice fire causing spark out of it than just by filling into a plastic can. Mike -------- "NO FEAR" - If you have no fear you did not go as fast as you could have !!! Kolb MK-III Xtra, 912-S Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=117616#117616 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "tc1917" <tc1917(at)hughes.net>
Subject: prop
Date: Jun 11, 2007
Just want to say that when I folded my firestar with a single blade, I always go verticle with it but I take a large piece of foam with a cut in the center and slide it on the down prop blade. It sits on the boom and the wings cradle it on both sides. very stable to trailer. I also do the same thing with my sling shot, three blade warp or ivo. pad the down blade with a large piece of foam. You have to pad or tie your blad when it is in the horizontal if you intend on trailering. Otherwise it woulds smake your ail. tubes. just wanted to add my two cents. Ted Cowan, Alabama. p.s. If I was trailering for a long distance, as you would buying or selling your plane, get yourself an industrial roll of clear wrap and litterly mummify your plane. it will get there safe without vibration and mostly dry if you do it right. easy to cut off. it will also keep your wing from falling off the wing holders. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 11, 2007
From: Vince Nicely <vincenic1(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: From 3 Blade to 2 Blade prop
Mike, I fold my Firestar II with Ivo 2-blade prop and prop. extension. With the prop horizontal, there is a little over 1" clearance of the prop to the aileron tube on each side. However, the ailerons are folded down. If they were up, there might be a problem. Vince Nicely FirestarII 450 Hrs > Something I don't understand.... > > When I folded the plane up at the end of the day (cheaper hanger rent) > > The aileron tubes were being "bowed" from pushing on the prop.... > > I ended up putting the prop straight up & down.... > > Does anybody elses do that....I built that area "Stock" > > Maybe only the Tennesse prop will fold like that ??? > > Gotta Fly... > Mike & "Jaz" in MN / N381PM > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: From 3 Blade to 2 Blade prop
From: "Ralph B" <ul15rhb(at)juno.com>
Date: Jun 11, 2007
I always fold mine with the prop horizontal as it won't fit in my garage with it vertical. I have an Ivo 2-blade. It was a nice flight yesterday with smooth air. Ralph -------- Ralph B Original Firestar 20 years flying it Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=117785#117785 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 11, 2007
From: "Jack B. Hart" <jbhart(at)onlyinternet.net>
Subject: FireFly Tailwheel Spring Failure
FireFlyer's & Kolbers Experienced a second spring failure. Fourteen landings after the right tail wheel spring broke the left spring failed. No ground loop this time. Both of these springs failed in the same way. I took a photo. It can be seen at: http://www.thirdshift.com/jack/firefly/firefly132.html Since all of this happened at the same time the tailwheel tire wore away, it may not be a bad thing to replace these springs every time you replace the tailwheel. Jack B. Hart FF004 Winchester, IN ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "pat ladd" <pj.ladd(at)btinternet.com>
Subject: MV
Date: Jun 11, 2007
Hi All, I am trying to knock together an article on the MV Fly-in which I will try and get published in our Microlight mag. I have a few notes but it would be a help if participants could let me have some details of their flights to MV and Back. Where they came from, what plane and engine, time taken, hours flown, distance flown, weather, problems etc. The regime you fly under,. Ultralight, Sports Pilot, Experimental etc wouldalso be interesting. Just the facts, man. I will put it all together. Cheers Pat ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: New topic: Loctite
From: Dwight Kottke <Dwight.Kottke(at)hti.htch.com>
Date: Jun 11, 2007
The Loctite line of thread adhesives hasn't been talked about much here so I thought I would bring it up. I use it regularly on nuts and bolts in hazardous locations, but how about a couple of drops on a new cable before you crimp on a new ferrule? What do you boys think? Dwight Kottke Minnesota Flying Farmer Firestar 377 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 11, 2007
From: Dana Hague <d-m-hague(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: New topic: Loctite
At 04:14 PM 6/11/2007, Dwight Kottke wrote: >The Loctite line of thread adhesives hasn't been talked about much here so >I thought I would bring it up. I use it regularly on nuts and bolts in >hazardous locations, but how about a couple of drops on a new cable before >you crimp on a new ferrule? What do you boys think? I wouldn't. The nicopress sleeves are designed to hold the full rated strength of the cable. Adding anything else could conceivably reduce the strength. -Dana -- -- Most politicians aren't crooks, but the ones that are sure are making the other 10 percent look bad. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 11, 2007
From: Dana Hague <d-m-hague(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: FireFly Tailwheel Spring Failure
At 01:50 PM 6/11/2007, Jack B. Hart wrote: > >Experienced a second spring failure....it may not be a bad thing to >replace these springs every time you replace the tailwheel... Not a surprising failure; it broke at the most highly stressed point. Metal fatigue is an issue, especially if the tailwheel shimmies. I went through quite a few springs when I had my T-Craft. Some of the guys used drawbar springs like this one: http://www.mcmaster.com/param/images/extension/safetydrawbara.gif These last much longer. I couldn't use one like that since I couldn't fine one that would fit, and still be soft enough to let my swivel tailwheel pop out of the detent when necessary. BTW, I browsed through the other pages in your "Firefly Slide Show", and there is a lot of good information there. Is there an index page? I couldn't find one. -Dana -- -- Most politicians aren't crooks, but the ones that are sure are making the other 10 percent look bad. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Richard Pike" <richard(at)bcchapel.org>
Subject: Re: FireFly Tailwheel Spring Failure
Date: Jun 11, 2007
Make your own drawbar spring like that. A couple lengths of model airplane piano wire bent to shape, spring from Loew's... Richard Pike MKIII N420P (420ldPoops) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dana Hague" <d-m-hague(at)comcast.net> Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 8:28 PM Subject: Re: Kolb-List: FireFly Tailwheel Spring Failure Some of the guys > used drawbar springs like this one: > > http://www.mcmaster.com/param/images/extension/safetydrawbara.gif > > These last much longer. I couldn't use one like that since I couldn't > fine one that would fit, and still be soft enough to let my swivel > tailwheel pop out of the detent when necessary. >> -Dana ________________________________________________________________________________
From: HShack(at)aol.com
Date: Jun 11, 2007
Subject: Re: FireFly Tailwheel Spring Failure
In a message dated 6/11/2007 8:55:18 PM Eastern Daylight Time, richard(at)bcchapel.org writes: Make your own drawbar spring like that. A couple lengths of model airplane piano wire bent to shape, spring from Loew's... Lowe's has them, but not in the spring dept.; they are in the "door" section. They come two in a bubble-wrap pak; used to close a screen door [?]. Howard Shackleford FS II SC ************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: HShack(at)aol.com
Date: Jun 11, 2007
Subject: Re: FireFly Tailwheel Spring Failure
In a message dated 6/11/2007 10:11:01 PM Eastern Daylight Time, HShack(at)aol.com writes: Lowe's has them, but not in the spring dept.; they are in the "door" section. They come two in a bubble-wrap pak; used to close a screen door [?]. There is a bit of chain attached you'll want to remove. Don't forget to buy some of the recommended chain & "S" hooks. Howard Shackleford FS II SC ************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: EIS (Engine Information System)
From: "John H Murphy" <jhm9812(at)yahoo.com>
Date: Jun 11, 2007
I'm thinking about installing a EIS in my FS II after looking at John Williamson's Kolbra aircraft at the Jean airport. Is there a requirment to have a battery to operate this thing? Has anybody retrofitted their aircraft with one? I'm guessing I will have to order a new panel from Kolb. My aircraft has EGT/CHT, airspeed, Hobbs and a variety of gauges that can be replaced by the EIS. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=117961#117961 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 12, 2007
From: "Richard Girard" <jindoguy(at)gmail.com>
Subject: Re: New topic: Loctite
Dwight, The Loctite line of threadlockers are anerobic (sp?) adhesives, meaning they only work in the absence of oxygen. While you might be able to get a small area inside the sleeve to seal well enough to get the Loctite to cure, by and large the effort would be wasted. Nicopress swaging sleeves and stops have worked for over 50 years as they are designed to do. They can be a big enough of a PITA to put on dry, I can't imagine what kind of mess they'd be with a liquid added to the process. MHO Rick On 6/11/07, Dana Hague wrote: > > At 04:14 PM 6/11/2007, Dwight Kottke wrote: > > The Loctite line of thread adhesives hasn't been talked about much here so > I thought I would bring it up. I use it regularly on nuts and bolts in > hazardous locations, but how about a couple of drops on a new cable before > you crimp on a new ferrule? What do you boys think? > > > I wouldn't. The nicopress sleeves are designed to hold the full rated > strength of the cable. Adding anything else could conceivably *reduce*the strength. > > -Dana > -- > -- > Most politicians aren't crooks, but the ones that are sure are making the > other 10 percent look bad. > > * > > > * > > -- Rick Girard "Ya'll drop on in" takes on a whole new meaning when you live at the airport. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: robert bean <slyck(at)frontiernet.net>
Subject: Re: FireFly Tailwheel Spring Failure
Date: Jun 12, 2007
I use the same springs on my MkIII in combination with the TNK breakaway wheel. To get it all to work happily together I machined the breakaway internals to break at a greater angle, added a spacer to the internal spring for more positive action, and run the yoke springs at near full compression. I now have more positive control and can make a good turn with no brakes. A 3/32" dome head rivet fits perfectly inside the internal spring. Careful taking it apart because those tiny parts will pop out of sight. BB ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: From 3 Blade to 2 Blade prop
From: "lucien" <lstavenhagen(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Jun 12, 2007
Yeah, the IVO prop is like that in the typical 2-blade configuration. It tends to be stalled when run static, giving an unreliable load when running it on the ground. Once airflow starts going through the prop disk, the blades unstall and you get the actual load you'll see in flight.... Kind of a pain.... you have to do the land-set-fly-land-set thing to get it just right.... My FSII has a 3 blade prop and the original builder fashioned a little boot that goes over the blade that sits between the wings when they're folded. That keeps it from tearing up the fabric. About 6mos. ago, though, I transported the plane from TX to new mexico on its open trailer (don't ever want to go that far on the open trailer again) and at the end of it, the prop had put a depression in the fabric on the one side. I run the clutch so the prop was free to freewheel up against the fabric... oops.... fortunately, going over the spot carefully with a heat gun took the "dent" right out.... LS -------- LS FS II Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=118009#118009 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: EIS (Engine Information System)
From: "JetPilot" <orcabonita(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Jun 12, 2007
I love the EIS, it allows you to set all the limits that you are comfortable with for your engine and gives you an alarm if any of those are exceeded. Most of the time your oil pressure gets low, or your EGT gets high when you are not looking at the guage, with the EIS you get a flashing light that you cant miss no matter where you eyes are when it happens. Its well worth doing. Mike -------- "NO FEAR" - If you have no fear you did not go as fast as you could have !!! Kolb MK-III Xtra, 912-S Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=118010#118010 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Richard & Martha Neilsen" <NeilsenRM(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Uncle John's Fly-In June 16-17
Date: Jun 12, 2007
I'm planning to fly to the Fly-in at Uncle John's Cider Mill this week end depending on weather. Is anyone else on the list going? I haven't decided which day I'm going but it's close so I could go both days. I don't know if there are any activities planned. Does anyone have any details? I see some phone numbers and haven't called yet but I can if I don't hear. Rick Neilsen Redrive VW powered MKIIIC ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Richard & Martha Neilsen" <NeilsenRM(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: FireFly Tailwheel Spring Failure
Date: Jun 12, 2007
I also have the compression springs and the TNK breakaway tail wheel. I set up my springs to be just barely tight but found that as originally configured the tail wheel would not rotate far enough to break and go into full swivel. I had to drill the bellcrank/arm on the tail wheel and attach the springs closer to the pivot point. Now I have a very positive control over the tail wheel and it will break into full swivel just as I hit full travel on the rudder. I have never had the tail wheel break to full swivel with this set up unexpectedly so I'm not sure what you would gain by adding a spacer to the breakaway spring. When I was using the TNK tension springs that came with the tail wheel it would break away in cross winds but not since I started using the compression springs. Rick Neilsen Redrive VW powered MKIIIC ----- Original Message ----- From: "robert bean" <slyck(at)frontiernet.net> Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 8:58 AM Subject: Re: Kolb-List: FireFly Tailwheel Spring Failure > > I use the same springs on my MkIII in combination with the TNK breakaway > wheel. > To get it all to work happily together I machined the breakaway internals > to break at a > greater angle, added a spacer to the internal spring for more positive > action, and run the yoke springs at near > full compression. I now have more positive control and can make a good > turn with no brakes. > > A 3/32" dome head rivet fits perfectly inside the internal spring. > Careful taking it apart because > those tiny parts will pop out of sight. > BB > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: 503 fuel pump weep hole makes a mess
From: "Tom Jones" <nahsikhs(at)elltel.net>
Date: Jun 12, 2007
I have a kitfox with a 503 Rotax. There aren't many people that will talk about them on the kitfox list so wonder if I might hear some opinions from you folks. Fuel slobers out of the fuel pump weep hole and makes a mess on my firewall. I have only 14 hours on the plane now and thought it was a defective fuel pump so put a new one on but it does the same thing. I zip tied a 3/4 inch plastic tube under the hole to catch the weeping fuel. It is still inconvenient because the catch tube is full after about two hours so I have to remember to empty it often. Is this a common problem with the 503? The people with 582s have never mentioned it. Is there a different remedy for the slobering fuel pump? -------- Tom Jones Classic IV, Phase one 503, Warp Ellensburg, WA Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=118081#118081 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Richard Pike" <richard(at)bcchapel.org>
Subject: Re: 503 fuel pump weep hole makes a mess
Date: Jun 12, 2007
Sure. Replace it with an electric Facet pump. (Assuming that the pump is below the level of your fuel tanks. In the wings? Not sure where the Kitfox tank is ) Or run a long catch tube down the firewall so it dumps the fuel overboard along the belly. Not as noticable that way... Richard Pike MKIII N420P (420ldPoops) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tom Jones" <nahsikhs(at)elltel.net> Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 3:55 PM Subject: Kolb-List: 503 fuel pump weep hole makes a mess > > I have a kitfox with a 503 Rotax. There aren't many people that will talk > about them on the kitfox list so wonder if I might hear some opinions from > you folks. > > Fuel slobers out of the fuel pump weep hole and makes a mess on my > firewall. I have only 14 hours on the plane now and thought it was a > defective fuel pump so put a new one on but it does the same thing. > > I zip tied a 3/4 inch plastic tube under the hole to catch the weeping > fuel. It is still inconvenient because the catch tube is full after about > two hours so I have to remember to empty it often. Is this a common > problem with the 503? The people with 582s have never mentioned it. Is > there a different remedy for the slobering fuel pump? > > -------- > Tom Jones > Classic IV, Phase one > 503, Warp > Ellensburg, WA > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=118081#118081 > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: 503 fuel pump weep hole makes a mess
From: "olendorf" <olendorf(at)gmail.com>
Date: Jun 12, 2007
I've never seen more that a couple tiny condensation drops appear in my pulse line. Something is amiss. It doesn't sound normal to me. No fuel should come out of that hole. Is your pulse line full of fuel also? It is better to have the pulse line leaving the engine going up to the pump so if any fuel does get in the line it would drain back to the engine. If you can't move the pump higher then loop the line so it is going up for a few inches first then loop back down to the pump. -------- Scott Olendorf Original Firestar, Rotax 447, Powerfin prop Schenectady, NY http://KolbFirestar.googlepages.com Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=118107#118107 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: 503 fuel pump weep hole makes a mess
From: "Tom Jones" <nahsikhs(at)elltel.net>
Date: Jun 12, 2007
Thanks guys! It sure does appear something is amiss if other 503s don't weep fuel out the fuel pump weep hole. Here is some more information and a couple of photos of how the fuel pump is installed. The pulse port is just under the bottom and in front of the front carb. The pump is on the fire wall 9 inches higher than the pulse port in level flight. The pulse line is 1/4 inch rubber automotive fuel injection line. The front half of the line is mounted level under the carbs then the rear half travels up slope at about 45 degrees to the fuel pump. This is how the kitfox manual shows to do the installation. The pulse line is 20 inches long. Rotax recomends a shorter line. I can't tell if the line is full of fuel because it is not clear. Today after one hour of flight at 6000 RPM the catch tube had almost exactly one ounce of fuel in it. The fuel in the catch tube is dirty black so I am pretty sure it came from the crank case. Any more ideas why this is happening or how I can/should change the installation? -------- Tom Jones Classic IV, Phase one 503, Warp Ellensburg, WA Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=118126#118126 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/img_5085_117.jpg ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 12, 2007
From: possums <possums(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: 503 fuel pump weep hole makes a mess
At 07:25 PM 6/12/2007, you wrote: > >Thanks guys! It sure does appear something is amiss if other 503s >don't weep fuel out the fuel pump weep hole. Here is some more >information and a couple of photos of how the fuel pump is installed. >xactly one ounce of fuel in it. The fuel in the catch tube is dirty >black so I am pretty sure it came from the crank case. > >Any more ideas why this is happening or how I can/should change the >installation? > >-------- >Tom Jones >Classic IV, Phase one Is it supposed to be horizontal like that? -- maybe it doesn't matter. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Malcolmbru(at)aol.com
Date: Jun 12, 2007
Subject: Re: 503 fuel pump weep hole makes a mess
the pulse line should only be 12 in long and of an harder hose( ask for pulse line) black ruber line is not an good idea even thow kit fox suggest it I know this because I have a kit fox also if the pump is leaking it will come out the hole . if the crank case is filling up it will come out the hole.some time people will poke a wire in the weep hole to clear it and a hole will develop in the diaphragm. I just rebuilt a fuel pump on a KF LIte and it was leaking fuel out the weep hole just by trying to start the motor a noticeable amount was leaking out the hole by just pulling it over 6 times . Are you going LSA? malcolm michigan And I will be at the fathers day fly in KF N347ex ************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: 503 fuel pump weep hole makes a mess
From: "Tom Jones" <nahsikhs(at)elltel.net>
Date: Jun 12, 2007
> It is better to have the pulse line leaving the engine going up to the pump so if any fuel does get in the line it would drain back to the engine. If you can't move the pump higher then loop the line so it is going up for a few inches first then loop back down to the pump. The pump is 9 inches above the pulse port but the line is level from the port for about 10 inches then a 45 degree slope up to the pump. Fuel may be pooling in the line and working its way up that gradual slope to the pump. I have some clear pulse line on hand. I could put that on with an immediate straingt up 7 inch rise from the port then level to the pump. That would be about 22 inches total pulse line length though. I will see if there is a place closer to the port to mount the pump. > if the pump is leaking it will come out the hole This engine pump combination has done this from the beginning right out of the box. I put a new pump on and it does the same thing. > if the crank case is filling up it will come out the hole The engine runs perfictly. Temps in the green and plugs brown. Turns 6200 on full power climb 800 ft. per minute at 60 MPH. > Are you going LSA? My Kitfox is regestered Experimental amature built. I am a private pilot flying under sport pilot rules -------- Tom Jones Classic IV, Phase one 503, Warp Ellensburg, WA Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=118168#118168 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "pat ladd" <pj.ladd(at)btinternet.com>
Subject: Another hurdle
Date: Jun 13, 2007
Hi All, having been accused of being anti American, I shall no doubt now be accused of being anti British. At the moment I just wish we had your system. I have just uncovered another hurdle. I have told you of the decision by our Chief Engineer that I must have a Flying Test done on my plane when it is repaired (Next week hah hah) Now I have discovered that my pilots licence may be invalid. The system here is that a pilots licence is issued for life but it has to re validated annually. Talking to another pilot at the strip I fly from he queried my revalidation. He had been in a similar position. He flies a Shadow and the entire fleet was grounded after a fault was discovered in the undercarriage. Redesigning and approving and building new undercarts took over a year and this ran perilously close to some of the pilots revalidation dates. This sent me to check on my dates. My licence was revalidated in July 05. My accident happened in July 06 and having nothing to fly I forgot the annual . Now we are at July 07 and I shall probably have to take at the very least a GFT, In the worst case I shall have to do the entire Licence again. Give me strength. Ellis Island here I come. Where do I sign up for citizenship classes? Cheers Pat ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: 503 fuel pump weep hole makes a mess
From: "Thom Riddle" <thomriddle(at)roadrunner.com>
Date: Jun 13, 2007
Speaking of weep holes on 503 Mikuni pump, can anyone tell me where in the following photos the weep hole is located? Also, is the pump supposed to mounted so that the pulse line inlet side of the pump is up or down or does it matter? I'm trying to help a guy inspect a Challenger with 503. Thanks, Thom in Buffalo Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=118189#118189 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/pump2t_0644_197.jpg http://forums.matronics.com//files/pump2b_0643_162.jpg ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Eugene Zimmerman <etzim62(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: 503 fuel pump weep hole makes a mess
Date: Jun 13, 2007
Tom, Not all pumps have the weep hole. Mount the pump so that the pulse line side is down so any liquid will drain out away from the pump diaphragm. The diaphragm must always remain free to move with the pulse frequency to pump properly. Only a pump with a slowly leaking diaphragm will benefit from a weep hole if mounted properly. Gene On Jun 13, 2007, at 9:07 AM, Thom Riddle wrote: > > > Speaking of weep holes on 503 Mikuni pump, can anyone tell me where > in the following photos the weep hole is located? Also, is the pump > supposed to mounted so that the pulse line inlet side of the pump > is up or down or does it matter? I'm trying to help a guy inspect a > Challenger with 503. > > Thanks, > Thom in Buffalo > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=118189#118189 > > > Attachments: > > http://forums.matronics.com//files/pump2t_0644_197.jpg > http://forums.matronics.com//files/pump2b_0643_162.jpg > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: 503 fuel pump weep hole makes a mess
From: "olendorf" <olendorf(at)gmail.com>
Date: Jun 13, 2007
Some pumps do not have the weep hole. Maybe they were for motorcycles or seedoos or something. If it has a weep hole it will be on the pulse port side. The hole should be the low spot so any fuel in there drains out sooner. For the Kitfox guy. I can't even imagine having enough fuel in the pulse line to make it all the way to the pump. I would guess a bad fuel pump or the fuel lines are leaking and the fuel runs down the side of the pump and it only looks like it is coming out the weep hole. -------- Scott Olendorf Original Firestar, Rotax 447, Powerfin prop Schenectady, NY http://KolbFirestar.googlepages.com Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=118200#118200 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: 503 fuel pump weep hole makes a mess
From: "Thom Riddle" <thomriddle(at)roadrunner.com>
Date: Jun 13, 2007
Thanks guys. Much appreciated. Looks like the Challenger has its fuel pump installed upside down, as I suspected. Thom in Buffalo Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=118203#118203 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: 503 fuel pump weep hole makes a mess
From: "Tom Jones" <nahsikhs(at)elltel.net>
Date: Jun 13, 2007
Here is a link to CPS's article on installing pulse pumps and weep holes and such. http://www.800-airwolf.com/pdffiles/ARTICLES/part%2053.PDF -------- Tom Jones Classic IV, Phase one 503, Warp Ellensburg, WA Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=118205#118205 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Mike Welch" <mdnanwelch7(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Another hurdle
Date: Jun 13, 2007
Pat, You needn't trouble yourself with Ellis Island. You WALK across the Mexican/American border into the United States. That's all there is to it! Of course, once you get here you can have Social Security benefits, emergency room health care, and of course, special education benefits. (You have to lay on the heavy British accent for Engish as a second language funds.) You might have to hang out at the local Home Depot for some "day labour" (notice the spelling) to REALLY orient yourself to the complete spectrum of benefits, but I doubt that would take too long. See ya soon, neighbour, Mike Welch >From: "pat ladd" <pj.ladd(at)btinternet.com> >Reply-To: kolb-list(at)matronics.com >To: >Subject: Kolb-List: Another hurdle >Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 10:50:57 +0100 > >Hi All, > >having been accused of being anti American, I shall no doubt now be accused >of being anti British. At the moment I just wish we had your system. > >I have just uncovered another hurdle. > >I have told you of the decision by our Chief Engineer that I must have a >Flying Test done on my plane when it is repaired (Next week hah hah) Now >I have discovered that my pilots licence may be invalid. > >The system here is that a pilots licence is issued for life but it has to >re validated annually. Talking to another pilot at the strip I fly from he >queried my revalidation. He had been in a similar position. He flies a >Shadow and the entire fleet was grounded after a fault was discovered in >the undercarriage. Redesigning and approving and building new undercarts >took over a year and this ran perilously close to some of the pilots >revalidation dates. > >This sent me to check on my dates. >My licence was revalidated in July 05. My accident happened in July 06 and >having nothing to fly I forgot the annual . Now we are at July 07 and I >shall probably have to take at the very least a GFT, In the worst case I >shall have to do the entire Licence again. Give me strength. > > Ellis Island here I come. Where do I sign up for citizenship classes? > >Cheers > >Pat _________________________________________________________________ Need a break? Find your escape route with Live Search Maps. http://maps.live.com/default.aspx?ss=Restaurants~Hotels~Amusement%20Park&cp=33.832922~-117.915659&style=r&lvl=13&tilt=-90&dir=0&alt=-1000&scene=1118863&encType=1&FORM=MGAC01 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: New topic: Loctite
From: "JetPilot" <orcabonita(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Jun 13, 2007
Putting locktite into a press fitting is a VERY BAD idea. At those pressures and stresses the locktite is more likely to act a a lubricant than a glue. Mike -------- "NO FEAR" - If you have no fear you did not go as fast as you could have !!! Kolb MK-III Xtra, 912-S Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=118230#118230 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: DBforfun(at)aol.com
Date: Jun 13, 2007
Subject: Re: Another hurdle
Nobody comes in thru Ellis Island any more. They just sneak in thru Mexico and we make them citizens. It is much easier now and if you go to the right state they will give you a drivers license and with that you can fly LSA. In a message dated 6/13/2007 2:52:56 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, pj.ladd(at)btinternet.com writes: Hi All, having been accused of being anti American, I shall no doubt now be accused of being anti British. At the moment I just wish we had your system. I have just uncovered another hurdle. I have told you of the decision by our Chief Engineer that I must have a Flying Test done on my plane when it is repaired (Next week hah hah) Now I have discovered that my pilots licence may be invalid. The system here is that a pilots licence is issued for life but it has to re validated annually. Talking to another pilot at the strip I fly from he queried my revalidation. He had been in a similar position. He flies a Shadow and the entire fleet was grounded after a fault was discovered in the undercarriage. Redesigning and approving and building new undercarts took over a year and this ran perilously close to some of the pilots revalidation dates. This sent me to check on my dates. My licence was revalidated in July 05. My accident happened in July 06 and having nothing to fly I forgot the annual . Now we are at July 07 and I shall probably have to take at the very least a GFT, In the worst case I shall have to do the entire Licence again. Give me strength. Ellis Island here I come. Where do I sign up for citizenship classes? Cheers Pat (http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List) ************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Another hurdle
From: "Paul Petty" <paulpetty(at)myway.com>
Date: Jun 13, 2007
Robert, I too had to count the months on my fingers and check calander thinking SHIT i missed wifes anneversary -------- Paul Petty Kolbra #12 Ms Dixie Final assembly! Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=118287#118287 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 13, 2007
From: "Rick Nelson" <geezer.nelson(at)gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Another hurdle
But won't he be required to install two roofs and a tile floor to be eligible to hang out at Home Depot? : ) On 6/13/07, Mike Welch wrote: > > Pat, > You needn't trouble yourself with Ellis Island. You WALK across the > Mexican/American border into the United States. That's all there is to it! > Of course, once you get here you can have Social Security benefits, > emergency room health care, and of course, special education benefits. (You > have to lay on the heavy British accent for Engish as a second language > funds.) > > You might have to hang out at the local Home Depot for some "day labour" > (notice the spelling) > to REALLY orient yourself to the complete spectrum of benefits, but I doubt > that would take too long. > > See ya soon, neighbour, Mike > Welch > > > >From: "pat ladd" <pj.ladd(at)btinternet.com> > >Reply-To: kolb-list(at)matronics.com > >To: > >Subject: Kolb-List: Another hurdle > >Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 10:50:57 +0100 > > > >Hi All, > > > >having been accused of being anti American, I shall no doubt now be accused > >of being anti British. At the moment I just wish we had your system. > > > >I have just uncovered another hurdle. > > > >I have told you of the decision by our Chief Engineer that I must have a > >Flying Test done on my plane when it is repaired (Next week hah hah) Now > >I have discovered that my pilots licence may be invalid. > > > >The system here is that a pilots licence is issued for life but it has to > >re validated annually. Talking to another pilot at the strip I fly from he > >queried my revalidation. He had been in a similar position. He flies a > >Shadow and the entire fleet was grounded after a fault was discovered in > >the undercarriage. Redesigning and approving and building new undercarts > >took over a year and this ran perilously close to some of the pilots > >revalidation dates. > > > >This sent me to check on my dates. > >My licence was revalidated in July 05. My accident happened in July 06 and > >having nothing to fly I forgot the annual . Now we are at July 07 and I > >shall probably have to take at the very least a GFT, In the worst case I > >shall have to do the entire Licence again. Give me strength. > > > > Ellis Island here I come. Where do I sign up for citizenship classes? > > > >Cheers > > > >Pat > > _________________________________________________________________ > Need a break? Find your escape route with Live Search Maps. > http://maps.live.com/default.aspx?ss=Restaurants~Hotels~Amusement%20Park&cp=33.832922~-117.915659&style=r&lvl=13&tilt=-90&dir=0&alt=-1000&scene=1118863&encType=1&FORM=MGAC01 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 13, 2007
From: The Kuffels <kuffel(at)cyberport.net>
Subject: Re: Another hurdle (US BFR)
Rick, <> Not sure what a "WSC endorsement" is but FAR 81.56(d) says, in part: "passed a pilot proficiency check conducted by an examiner, an approved pilot check airman, .., for a pilot certificate, rating, or operating privilege need not accomplish the flight review" In other words a multi-engine rating, an instructor rating, an instrument rating, a single engine sea rating, a multi-engine sea rating, commercial pilot, etc. all exempt a pilot from the BFR requirement for 2 years. So if your "WSC endorsement" didn't include a formal check ride, your beef is with the instructors not the Feds. Since they gave you at least 1 hour of ground and 1 hour of flight instruction (the only hard requirements in the BFR rule), all they needed to do was include the BFR endorsement in your logbook along with the WSC one. In fact, nothing in the rules says the BFR endorsement must be written into the logbook contemporaneously. In other words, you can contact the instructor, ship him your logbook, have him add the BFR wording and ship it back to you. If he thinks you are competent for an endorsement he certainly should think you are okay for the purposes of a BFR. And just to tweak Pat a little, tiny, teeny bit: The only pilot license equivalent we have here is for us flight instructors. We have to renew every two years (95% just take a ground school). Otherwise, we have to pass an instructor flight test for *one* of our ratings to get back all of one's instructor ratings. Sport, private and commercial pilots have no such restriction. They can not fly for 10 or 20 years and then just get a valid medical (or drivers license for Sport) and take a regular minimum 1 hour ground/1 hour flight BFR. There is no such thing as "failing" a BFR (it's just logged as dual), as soon as the instructor is comfortable with the pilot's skills he can sign them off. I've done this several times for relapsees. Tom Kuffel, CFI ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 13, 2007
From: Dana Hague <d-m-hague(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: 503 fuel pump weep hole makes a mess
At 09:59 AM 6/13/2007, olendorf wrote: > >Some pumps do not have the weep hole. Maybe they were for motorcycles or >seedoos or something. The stock Mikuni pumps don't have the hole; I believe it's added by Rotax (and other aircraft suppliers) as an added safety measure. -Dana -- -- Most politicians aren't crooks, but the ones that are sure are making the other 10 percent look bad. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 13, 2007
From: "Richard Girard" <jindoguy(at)gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Another hurdle (US BFR)
Tom, The WSC endorsement is for Weight Shift Control. I flew with two instructors, one to prepare for the check ride and sign me off for it, the other to do the check ride. Both were assured by the Lakeland FSDO that because the endorsement was for a new type and class I could not operate the aircraft as pilot in command so no BFR. Once the endorsement was earned I could operate as PIC and could then take the BFR ride. Your local office may interpret the rules differently, but that's the reasoning in Florida. Rick On 6/13/07, The Kuffels wrote: > > > Rick, > > < "flight" review>> > > Not sure what a "WSC endorsement" is but FAR 81.56(d) says, in part: > "passed a pilot proficiency check conducted by an examiner, an approved > pilot check airman, .., for a pilot certificate, rating, or operating > privilege need not accomplish the flight review" > > In other words a multi-engine rating, an instructor rating, an > instrument rating, a single engine sea rating, a multi-engine sea > rating, commercial pilot, etc. all exempt a pilot from the BFR > requirement for 2 years. So if your "WSC endorsement" didn't include a > formal check ride, your beef is with the instructors not the Feds. > Since they gave you at least 1 hour of ground and 1 hour of flight > instruction (the only hard requirements in the BFR rule), all they > needed to do was include the BFR endorsement in your logbook along with > the WSC one. In fact, nothing in the rules says the BFR endorsement > must be written into the logbook contemporaneously. In other words, you > can contact the instructor, ship him your logbook, have him add the BFR > wording and ship it back to you. If he thinks you are competent for an > endorsement he certainly should think you are okay for the purposes of a > BFR. > > And just to tweak Pat a little, tiny, teeny bit: The only pilot license > equivalent we have here is for us flight instructors. We have to renew > every two years (95% just take a ground school). Otherwise, we have to > pass an instructor flight test for *one* of our ratings to get back all > of one's instructor ratings. Sport, private and commercial pilots have > no such restriction. They can not fly for 10 or 20 years and then just > get a valid medical (or drivers license for Sport) and take a regular > minimum 1 hour ground/1 hour flight BFR. There is no such thing as > "failing" a BFR (it's just logged as dual), as soon as the instructor is > comfortable with the pilot's skills he can sign them off. I've done > this several times for relapsees. > > Tom Kuffel, CFI > > -- Rick Girard "Ya'll drop on in" takes on a whole new meaning when you live at the airport. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 13, 2007
From: "Richard Girard" <jindoguy(at)gmail.com>
Subject: Re: 503 fuel pump weep hole makes a mess
I have all three types of the Mikuni dual pumps that are currently on the market. The two most often found at ultralight suppliers are those pictured in the CPS article previously posted to this conversation. The third I found at a go kart shop. The oldest of my three is the one with one straight and two bent hose barbs. On this pump, the pulse port is a square brass fitting with a hose barb at 90 degrees pressed into a boss, about an 1/8th inch tall, on the back of the mounting plate. The weep hole in this style pump appears to be factory drilled. The one I bought from CPS last year is the one with all straight hose barbs. On this style, the pulse port boss is about 3/4" tall and the hose barb is pressed into the side of it. In the CPS article, Mike said they drill the weep hole on these and that appears to be correct. The third style is one I first saw on eBay this winter. I went searching online and found it at Go Kart Supply. This style has the pulse port boss cast into the front cover and the bent hose barbs are turned outward 90 degrees to the mounting surface of the pump. The weep hole is drilled in a small divot in the center of the pulse pump boss and appears to be done by the factory. My criteria for factory versus distributor drilling of the weep hole is simply whether it is centered where it's drilled. The one from CPS is drilled willy nilly, the other two have the hole centered in the fitting or the boss respectively. Rick On 6/13/07, Dana Hague wrote: > > > At 09:59 AM 6/13/2007, olendorf wrote: > > > >Some pumps do not have the weep hole. Maybe they were for motorcycles or > >seedoos or something. > > The stock Mikuni pumps don't have the hole; I believe it's added by Rotax > (and other aircraft suppliers) as an added safety measure. > > -Dana > > -- > -- > Most politicians aren't crooks, but the ones that are sure are making the > other 10 percent look bad. > > -- Rick Girard "Ya'll drop on in" takes on a whole new meaning when you live at the airport. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Thom Riddle <thomriddle(at)roadrunner.com>
Subject: Re: Another hurdle (US BFR)
Date: Jun 14, 2007
Pat, What is involved with the UK annual "revalidation" exercise? The Biannual Flight Review required of all pilots in the USA, except those operating under our Part 103 REAL Ultralight rule, consists of a minimum of two hours of instruction, one of which is ground instruction and at least one in the air. To add to the confusion, the FAA no longer calls this a Biannual Flight Review, merely a flight review that must be completed within the previous 24 months if one is to act as PIC. But we pilots are a simple lot and mostly resist nonsensical change, so we still call it the BFR with many assorted (and sordid) meanings of the acronym. Thom in Buffalo ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "pat ladd" <pj.ladd(at)btinternet.com>
Subject: Re: Another hurdle
Date: Jun 14, 2007
It's June 13th over on this side of the Pond.>> Hi weell.. its a date line thing and I don`t have the plane yet Pat :-) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "pat ladd" <pj.ladd(at)btinternet.com>
Subject: Re: Another hurdle (US BFR)
Date: Jun 14, 2007
What is involved with the UK annual "revalidation" exercise?>> Hi Thom, I f you get the re validation done before the old one runs out all you have to do is produce your log book to show that you have flown 5 hours in the previous 12 months (13 months in practice). Your log book is stamped and that is that. It is is when the period has run out that the problem arises. In fact the authorities tell me that Mick Moulai, the UK Kolb dealer, is authorised to re validate . licences. He will be doing the flight testing, hopefully with me aboard (the test has to be carried out with full load) so maybe that can be treated as a GFT and he can put the required stamp in my book. I haven`t talked to him yet. Hope springs eternal.. Regarding immigration. Thanks to everyone who has pointed me in the direction of the Mexican border rather than Ellis Island. Having heard, while I was in the States, a couple of tattooed, bare armed and overweight Harley riders boasting that they were on the way to the Border `to get me a Mexican` on the grounds that `they come here, rape our women and take our jobs. A`hm a vet, an` I aint bin treated right an a`hm going down there to sort it out` I think I will give it a miss. Cheers Pat ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "pat ladd" <pj.ladd(at)btinternet.com>
Subject: MV
Date: Jun 14, 2007
Hi, someone at MV told me but I have forgotten. How many years has the fly-in been running and how did it start? Pat ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Permanent Gap Seal for a Mk-III
Date: Jun 14, 2007
From: "Kirby Dennis Contr MDA/AL" <Dennis.Kirby(at)kirtland.af.mil>
Kolb Friends - I'm thinking of modifying my Mark-III to have a permanent gap seal. (Presently, my set up is factory stock - gap seal must be removed every time the wings are folded.) Because I store my Kolb with wings folded, I go thru the wing-folding routine every time I fly. Gap seal goes on and off for every flight. At Monument Valley last month, I saw someone's Mark-III (can't remember whose - Boyd's, maybe?) with the gap seal built to remain in place even with the wings folded. The gap seal did not interfere with the wing-folding procedure. This is what I'd like to have. I realize I'll have to rebuild the gap seal from scratch ... not a big deal. Can anyone offer any tips or advice along these lines? Many thanks (in advance) - Dennis Kirby Mark-III, "Magic Bike" in Cedar Crest, NM ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "summersg" <summersg(at)gmail.com>
Subject: Firestar II For Sale
Date: Jun 14, 2007
1995 Firestar II; 192 hours TTAE; Rotax 503 DCDI; Dual high altitude carburetors; Oil Injection; Ivoprop ground adjustable 3-blade propeller; ESI engine monitoring system; Altimeter; Airspeed indicator; Compass; Full swivel tail wheel. Asking $9900. Located in Sacramento (Winters), CA. Gary: 916 448 9465. 12:44 PM ________________________________________________________________________________
From: N27SB(at)aol.com
Date: Jun 14, 2007
Subject: Firefly007 Seabase
The hanger is taking shape Steve ************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Permanent Gap Seal for a Mk-III
From: "John H Murphy" <jhm9812(at)yahoo.com>
Date: Jun 14, 2007
I would also like to get plans for my FS II. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=118496#118496 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Russ Kinne <russ(at)rkiphoto.com>
Subject: Re: Firefly007 Seabase
Date: Jun 14, 2007
Steve What a beauty! -- now THAT's living -- for a seaplane pilot. Hope you have plenty of time to enjoy it. Congratulations ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 14, 2007
From: The Kuffels <kuffel(at)cyberport.net>
Subject: Re: Another hurdle (US BFR)
Rick, <> Ah yes, forgot about Catch-22. as 61.56(c)(1) Accomplished a flight review given in an aircraft for which that pilot is rated by an authorized instructor but the exemption for a new rating says 61.56(d) .. passed a pilot proficiency check *conducted by an examiner*.. for a pilot certificate, rating, ,, [emphasis added] but the WSC check is from 61.321(b) Successfully complete a proficiency check from an *authorized instructor*.. [emphasis added] so you don't have to be PIC to take the BFR but you must have been able to be PIC sometime before the BFR. Clearly this is an area where we should get the EAA to lobby the FAA for a minor rule change. I'll send them a suggestion to add "an authorized instructor, " to 61.56(d). The more people who do the same the better. The idea is to encourage people to get new ratings not punish them financially. Tom ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 14, 2007
From: Bob Noyer <a58r(at)verizon.net>
Subject: Old Kolb VHS tape
I lent an Old Kolb Airplane Co. demo tape to someone who was going to dup it. Now I can't remember who it was. Anyone recall it? Many thanks. regards, Bob N. FireFly 070 Old Kolb http://www.angelfire.com/rpg/ronoy/ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Richard Pike" <richard(at)bcchapel.org>
Subject: Re: Old Kolb VHS tape
Date: Jun 14, 2007
It wasn't me, but our club has one, I'll see if I can get it and make you a DVD if yours doesn't turn up. Richard Pike MKIII N420P (420ldPoops) ----- Original Message ----- From: Bob Noyer To: kolb-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2007 10:20 PM Subject: Kolb-List: Old Kolb VHS tape I lent an Old Kolb Airplane Co. demo tape to someone who was going to dup it. Now I can't remember who it was. Anyone recall it? Many thanks. regards, Bob N. FireFly 070 Old Kolb http://www.angelfire.com/rpg/ronoy/ ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 15, 2007
From: Bob Noyer <a58r(at)verizon.net>
Subject: Re: Old Kolb VHS tape
Bless you, Rev regards, Bob N. FireFly 070 Old Kolb http://www.angelfire.com/rpg/ronoy/ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "pat ladd" <pj.ladd(at)btinternet.com>
Subject: Re: Firefly007 Seabase
Date: Jun 15, 2007
The hanger is taking shape>> Nice bit of stonework there Steve. Your own work? Pat ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "pat ladd" <pj.ladd(at)btinternet.com>
Subject: Re: MV
Date: Jun 15, 2007
Hi Lar, there are some pics on the way to you. Snail mail. I also have some of the cottage in Devon I thought you might like which I will send .. Emjoy Cheers Pat ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jeremy Casey" <1planeguy(at)kilocharlie.us>
Subject: Knock-off Kolb
Date: Jun 15, 2007
Surfing this morning and found a picture that looked VERY familiar...is a trigear knockoff of an Ultrastar!!! http://aeromoto.free.fr/images2/hdmultiaxe/pulsarmono_1.jpg Jeremy ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 15, 2007
From: Terry <tkrolfe(at)usadatanet.net>
Subject: Fly-in to Homer's
Gentlemen, Looks like great weather to fly to Homer's tomorrow. I will be at Smoketown Airport at 8:30 am for those that wish to fly along. See the rest of you at Homer's. Good flying to all, Terry - FireFly #95 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: FireFly fuel tank options?
From: "JonSteiger" <kolb-list(at)jonsteiger.com>
Date: Jun 15, 2007
Hello all! Its been a looong time since I last posted, unfortunately the pace of life has kept me from getting into the sky as often as I would like. :( I'm trying to rectify that though, and am just now going through the process of getting my FireFly ready for the flying season. (I was hoping to finish in time to make it to a local fly-in tomorrow, but unfortunately ran out of time so rather than rush things I'll be driving down instead.) ANYWAY.... When I removed the fuel tank to clean it out and replace some of the fuel lines, I noticed that the line the previous owner plumbed to the bottom of the tank was leaking (around the push-in grommet), and also after 10 years of use, the gas tank seems to have gotten a bit softer than it used to be, so I'd like to replace it. I noticed a post from August of 2006 from John H. saying that Kolb has 6 gallon tanks to replace the 5 gallon. I plan to send TNK an e-mail to inquire about these, but I was also wondering what other options might be available to me? (For anyone who has ordered one of the new style TNK tanks, how do you like them? Decent quality?) My current tank is about 10 inches square by 14" high, and it bears a striking resemblance to the chemical containers we used to buy filled with chlorine for the swimming pool. I thought about looking into building a custom tank to get some more volume, but since the plane is built already, this does limit my options somewhat. (I'd also need to revisit my weight and balance calculations to see where such a tank might be placed.) The current tank is 5 gallons, and to fly to the "local" airport, I need to carry some extra fuel with me in order to get there and back with an acceptable reserve. (I have an old backpack strapped to the back of the fuel tank and use it to carry a few 2 liter soda bottles filled with premix which I use to refill the tank prior to departing for home.) I thought about a racing fuel cell, or a large gas can, but any of those would require the cage which braces the original style tank to be cut, and I'd like to avoid that if possible. Since my time is at a premium unfortunately, I suspect what I will probably end up doing is to get a 6 gallon tank from Kolb, assuming they are available and reasonably priced. This will at least get me in the air again and give me an extra gallon of fuel over what I had before. One idea I had is to perhaps hang a sealed tank (or two) of some type above the main fuel tank. These aux. tanks would be airtight and have only one opening each, a barbed fitting at the bottom to which would be attached a length of fuel line which would run down and into the top of the main tank through a tight fitting grommet or a bulkhead fitting. The line(s) from the aux tank(s) would dangle down into the main fuel tank such that if the tank is full, the ends would be covered. Once the fuel level in the main tank started to drop, the ends of these lines would be uncovered, which would allow air to enter and drain fuel from the aux tanks until the ends of the lines were covered again. (Basically the same concept as the office water cooler or one of those 5 gallon pet waterers.) Seems like this would be a very reliable method, no moving parts, in-flight refueling, and no need to manually start or stop the refueling, it'd be automatic. The only hassle might be refilling those aux tanks. I guess having a gas cap opening would make that part easier, although it would have to seal perfectly airtight in order to prevent fuel from leaking down and overfilling the main tank. Anyway, that was just something stewing in the back of my mind so I figured I'd spew it here in case someone can think of a reason why it'd be a dumb thing to do. :D Sorry for the length of this post! Many thanks in advance for any assistance anyone can provide! Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=118668#118668 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 15, 2007
From: Dana Hague <d-m-hague(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Knock-off Kolb
At 10:19 AM 6/15/2007, Jeremy Casey wrote: > >Surfing this morning and found a picture that looked VERY familiar...is >a trigear knockoff of an Ultrastar!!! > >http://aeromoto.free.fr/images2/hdmultiaxe/pulsarmono_1.jpg Wasn't that the European outfit that was producing Kolb knockoffs? But a training wheel on an Ultrastar is just... wrong. -Dana -- -- Most politicians aren't crooks, but the ones that are sure are making the other 10 percent look bad. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 15, 2007
From: "Richard Girard" <jindoguy(at)gmail.com>
Subject: Re: FireFly fuel tank options?
Jon, TNK had the six gallon tanks at Sun n Fun for $20. They are the same dimensions as the 5 gallon tanks, except they are taller. When I asked Travis if they were as big a PITA to wrestle into the cage as the originals, he said, "pretty much the same". As long as you're brainstorming ideas for an auxillary tank, why not a root tube tank from a Quicksilver? If it would fit, it might be the solution to your problem and would double your fuel capacity. I do not know if you would have enough room between the spar carry through tube of the cage and the engine, but it might. While you're replumbing you might want to consider the new top tap that removes that bottom grommet. All your fuel lines would then be on the top of the tank where inspection and replacement is much easier. Rick On 6/15/07, JonSteiger wrote: > > > Hello all! Its been a looong time since I last posted, unfortunately the > pace of life has kept me from getting into the sky as often as I would > like. :( I'm trying to rectify that though, and am just now going > through the process of getting my FireFly ready for the flying season. (I > was hoping to finish in time to make it to a local fly-in tomorrow, but > unfortunately ran out of time so rather than rush things I'll be driving > down instead.) > > ANYWAY.... When I removed the fuel tank to clean it out and replace > some of the fuel lines, I noticed that the line the previous owner plumbed > to the bottom of the tank was leaking (around the push-in grommet), and also > after 10 years of use, the gas tank seems to have gotten a bit softer than > it used to be, so I'd like to replace it. > > I noticed a post from August of 2006 from John H. saying that Kolb has > 6 gallon tanks to replace the 5 gallon. I plan to send TNK an e-mail to > inquire about these, but I was also wondering what other options might be > available to me? (For anyone who has ordered one of the new style TNK > tanks, how do you like them? Decent quality?) My current tank is about 10 > inches square by 14" high, and it bears a striking resemblance to the > chemical containers we used to buy filled with chlorine for the swimming > pool. > > > I thought about looking into building a custom tank to get some more > volume, but since the plane is built already, this does limit my options > somewhat. (I'd also need to revisit my weight and balance calculations to > see where such a tank might be placed.) The current tank is 5 gallons, and > to fly to the "local" airport, I need to carry some extra fuel with me in > order to get there and back with an acceptable reserve. (I have an old > backpack strapped to the back of the fuel tank and use it to carry a few 2 > liter soda bottles filled with premix which I use to refill the tank prior > to departing for home.) I thought about a racing fuel cell, or a large gas > can, but any of those would require the cage which braces the original style > tank to be cut, and I'd like to avoid that if possible. > > Since my time is at a premium unfortunately, I suspect what I will > probably end up doing is to get a 6 gallon tank from Kolb, assuming they are > available and reasonably priced. This will at least get me in the air again > and give me an extra gallon of fuel over what I had before. > > One idea I had is to perhaps hang a sealed tank (or two) of some type > above the main fuel tank. These aux. tanks would be airtight and have only > one opening each, a barbed fitting at the bottom to which would be attached > a length of fuel line which would run down and into the top of the main tank > through a tight fitting grommet or a bulkhead fitting. The line(s) from the > aux tank(s) would dangle down into the main fuel tank such that if the tank > is full, the ends would be covered. Once the fuel level in the main tank > started to drop, the ends of these lines would be uncovered, which would > allow air to enter and drain fuel from the aux tanks until the ends of the > lines were covered again. (Basically the same concept as the office water > cooler or one of those 5 gallon pet waterers.) Seems like this would be a > very reliable method, no moving parts, in-flight refueling, and no need to > manually start or stop the refueling, it'd be automatic. The only hassle > might be ref! > illing those aux tanks. I guess having a gas cap opening would make that > part easier, although it would have to seal perfectly airtight in order to > prevent fuel from leaking down and overfilling the main tank. Anyway, that > was just something stewing in the back of my mind so I figured I'd spew it > here in case someone can think of a reason why it'd be a dumb thing to do. > :D > > Sorry for the length of this post! Many thanks in advance for any > assistance anyone can provide! > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=118668#118668 > > -- Rick Girard "Ya'll drop on in" takes on a whole new meaning when you live at the airport. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Larry Cottrell" <lcottrell(at)fmtcblue.com>
Subject: spacer for a warp drive
Date: Jun 15, 2007
I finally got the 6 inch 8.8 metric bolts that I needed to put a spacer in front of my warp prop. On the flight to MV and back the warp literally beat to pieces the gap seal between the aileron tubes and the wing for the entire length of the propeller. Not to mention the noise was really bad, giving me headaches until I ruined my hearing enough to be able to tolerate the noise. I finally had to order the bolts from John Deere, the only place that I could find them that length. I installed them today with the 2 1/2 inch spacer, and since the wind was reasonable took it up for a test. MUCH better! It was even tolerable without the ANR turned on. I had a very enjoyable 30 minute flight around here harassing the local coyote. Larry C ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Larry Bourne" <gogittum(at)msn.com>
Subject: Re: MV
Date: Jun 15, 2007
Snail.........mail.......whazzat ?? I was starting to think I wasn't being spoke to. :-) Lar. Larry Bourne Santa Fe, NM www.gogittum.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "pat ladd" <pj.ladd(at)btinternet.com> Sent: Friday, June 15, 2007 2:16 AM Subject: Re: Kolb-List: MV > > Hi Lar, > > there are some pics on the way to you. Snail mail. I also have some of > the cottage in Devon I thought you might like which I will send .. Emjoy > > Cheers > > Pat > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jim Baker" <jlbaker(at)msbit.net>
Date: Jun 15, 2007
Subject: Re: spacer for a warp drive
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (4.41) > I finally had to > order the bolts from John Deere, the only place that I could find > them that length. Should have tried.... http://mdmetric.com/ Jim Baker 580.788.2779 Elmore City, OK ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 16, 2007
From: Dana Hague <d-m-hague(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Permanent Gap Seal for a Mk-III
This is sounding interesting for my Ultrastar, too... though the previous owner flew without any gap seal at all, apparently with no problems (I haven't flown the plane yet). -Dana -- -- Most politicians aren't crooks, but the ones that are sure are making the other 10 percent look bad. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: spacer for a warp drive
From: "lucien" <lstavenhagen(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Jun 16, 2007
Probably a good thing the prop got rid of the seal in that area as it shouldn't have too much benefit anyway ;). I only use gap seal along the length of the aileron portion on my FS II, since that's really where its effective. I don't see any bennie of putting it along the non-flying part of the tube? But yes, there's a prop extension on my titan tornado that makes the entire thing vastly quieter. My FS II just has a warp drive 3-blade on a C box, mere inches from the trailing edge of the wing and it's LOUD in the air ;)...... LS -------- LS FS II Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=118727#118727 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: 503 fuel pump weep hole makes a mess
From: "Tom Jones" <nahsikhs(at)elltel.net>
Date: Jun 16, 2007
Here's an update on my weeping pulse pump. I dismanteled both fuel pumps I have tried and both look to be in perfect shape. I installed each pump, one at at time, and each leaked fuel out the weep hole. I then rerouted the pulse line so it goes straight up over the carb flanges imediately from the pulse port on the crankcase. This is about 5 or 6 inches straight up. This change made no difference in the amount of fuel leaking out the fuel pump weep hole. Ingot about a half ounce in 7/10 of an hour flight today. The line is still 21 inches long. I can't figure out a way to mount the pump closer and still have it higher than the pulse port. I am still using automotive 30R9 rubber fuel injection hose for the pulse line. Could the pulse line material...being rubber...have anything to do with the leaking weep hole? -------- Tom Jones Classic IV, Phase one 503, Warp Ellensburg, WA Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=118752#118752 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 16, 2007
From: "Richard Girard" <jindoguy(at)gmail.com>
Subject: Re: 503 fuel pump weep hole makes a mess
Tom, I went into the archives to review the situation before I replied. I have a few questions. You said you have about 60 hours on the airplane, is this true for the engine as well? Was the engine new when when you put it on the aircraft, or was it rebuilt? Did you do the breakin procedure exactly per the Rotax Installation Manual (page 21-1)? Have you had any cold seizures (to check, pull off the exhaust manifold and examine the pistons for signs of displaced metal)? Have you done a compression check lately? As I understand the pulse port, it should be just that, a port for a pressure wave to travel to the fuel pump diaphragm. No fluid should move through this port at all. I'll go out on a limb and suggest that your engine has excessive blow by that is pressurizing the case when the pistons are in the compression/power part of the stroke before the transfer ports open. I base this on your description of the residue in your catch can is black in color suggesting it is contaminated by compression by products. You're lucky in that Clyde Poser is just on the other side of the Cascades from you. If nothing anyone has offered here has helped, contact him. He has a repair station and years of experience with the Rotax two stroke. If anyone knows where to look for your gremlin, it'll be him. Keep us all updated and good luck. Rick On 6/16/07, Tom Jones wrote: > > > Here's an update on my weeping pulse pump. > > I dismanteled both fuel pumps I have tried and both look to be in perfect > shape. I installed each pump, one at at time, and each leaked fuel out the > weep hole. > > I then rerouted the pulse line so it goes straight up over the carb > flanges imediately from the pulse port on the crankcase. This is about 5 or > 6 inches straight up. This change made no difference in the amount of fuel > leaking out the fuel pump weep hole. Ingot about a half ounce in 7/10 of an > hour flight today. The line is still 21 inches long. I can't figure out a > way to mount the pump closer and still have it higher than the pulse port. > > I am still using automotive 30R9 rubber fuel injection hose for the pulse > line. Could the pulse line material...being rubber...have anything to do > with the leaking weep hole? > > -------- > Tom Jones > Classic IV, Phase one > 503, Warp > Ellensburg, WA > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=118752#118752 > > -- Rick Girard "Ya'll drop on in" takes on a whole new meaning when you live at the airport. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Richard Pike" <richard(at)bcchapel.org>
Subject: Re: 503 fuel pump weep hole makes a mess
Date: Jun 16, 2007
I would replace the rubber hose with a length of soft aluminum 1/4" fuel line, use a short length of rubber or urethane fuel line at each end to attach it to the pulse port and to the fuel pump. If what is coming out of your weep hole still continues to be black, then you have bigger problems than just a mess on your firewall ala Rick's reply. Richard Pike MKIII N420P (420ldPoops) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tom Jones" <nahsikhs(at)elltel.net> Sent: Saturday, June 16, 2007 3:20 PM Subject: Kolb-List: Re: 503 fuel pump weep hole makes a mess > > Here's an update on my weeping pulse pump. > > I dismanteled both fuel pumps I have tried and both look to be in perfect > shape. I installed each pump, one at at time, and each leaked fuel out > the weep hole. > > I then rerouted the pulse line so it goes straight up over the carb > flanges imediately from the pulse port on the crankcase. This is about 5 > or 6 inches straight up. This change made no difference in the amount of > fuel leaking out the fuel pump weep hole. Ingot about a half ounce in > 7/10 of an hour flight today. The line is still 21 inches long. I can't > figure out a way to mount the pump closer and still have it higher than > the pulse port. > > I am still using automotive 30R9 rubber fuel injection hose for the pulse > line. Could the pulse line material...being rubber...have anything to do > with the leaking weep hole? > > -------- > Tom Jones > Classic IV, Phase one > 503, Warp > Ellensburg, WA > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=118752#118752 > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: 503 fuel pump weep hole makes a mess
From: "Tom Jones" <nahsikhs(at)elltel.net>
Date: Jun 16, 2007
Okay to clarify some more. The engine now has 14 flight hours on it. It was broken in according to the rotax manual. Total engine run time including break in, prop adjustment, taxi testing etc. is about 20 hours. The fuel pump leaked from the beginning, that is why I put a new one on. The new pump leaks too. No cold seisures. Compression is good. I think the leaked fuel is black because it is the condensate rotax speaks of and thus requires the weep hole in aircraft fuel pumps. I think it is black because it is mostly oil. I think the fuel/oil is able to work its way up to the pump because of the weep hole. I will replace the rubber pulse line with a plastic one to see if it helps. -------- Tom Jones Classic IV, Phase one 503, Warp Ellensburg, WA Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=118797#118797 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Mark Shimei" <mshimei(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: Wings needed
Date: Jun 17, 2007
I am still looking for a set of Ultrastar or firefly wings. near FL E-me mshimei(at)bellsouth.net It is a better subject than seafoam green. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 17, 2007
From: jerb <ulflyer(at)verizon.net>
Subject: Re: FireFly fuel tank options?
Hi Jon, Sorry to hear you don't have time to fly. Just curious, how far is it to your local airport - miles and flying time? Do you have the full enclosure option - that is the wind screen that wraps side-side, from nose cone to the leading edge of the wing? We never installed the rear clear vinyl part as were in Texas and soft so if its below 50 its to cold to fly any how. We used to have a FireFly with full wind screen so I got good idea of it flying limits on 5 gallons. If they only want $20 for that new 6 gallon tank I would grab one in a heart beat - cheapest extra gallon you'll get. Do a top pick up on the tank not punched in the bottom, they leak over time. In the top put a 1/4"OD tube held in place with a fitting in the top of the tank to seal and secure the 1/4" copper or alum. tubing with it extending down to within a 1/2" of the bottom - make sure the tube can't slide up or down. In my CGS Hawk I used a 10 gallon Challenger tank. This tank has a female threaded port on the top for a pick up - their normal configuration is a single brass fitting which screws into the port - I made a alum. 5/8" dia. plug, drilled 3 clearance holes in it, (2) for 1/4" tubes and (1) for 1/8". In the plug I mounted (T-88 epoxied) 1 short 1/4" tube short one for a vent, another 1/4" extended to with about 1/2" of the bottom of the tank, and an 1/8" dia tube down to about the bottom of the main pickup for primer pickup. I tried using 1/8" alum. tube first, found that it is not very strong. Managed to break it off right away just trying to remove a temp. primer line hose, I was happy it happened when it did. Had to convert to the backup using 1/8" Nylaflow tubing. It's the stuff used for brake lines sold by Aircraft Spruce and is supposed to be suitable for fuel line. So far this has worked great. You might be able to accomplish the same thing with a flange glued to the top of the tank using the proper material - Jim Baker probably can come up with glue that will stick to polyethylene tank. Ya, we used to have same problem as you not enough fuel to make it round trip and sweating fuel takes fly out of it. My partner had a 2-1/2 gal. gas can that would fit down behind the seat if I recall right. We thought a 7-1/2 gallon tank would have been perfect but six is better than five. He also rigged up a way to carry another 2-1/2 above the normal tank if needed. With the enclosure we would cruise between 65-70, 60 if we were not pushing it. While there has been some debate about this our Fly had a sweet spot - kind of like getting on step with floats where the nose would drop a little and it would pick up speed allowing you to hold the speed at lower RPM. Both of us have experienced it. He flew it more than I did. Well I have rambled on enough, jerb ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 17, 2007
From: jerb <ulflyer(at)verizon.net>
Subject: Re: 503 fuel pump weep hole makes a mess
What kind of tubing were you using, tubing made for vacuum applications or black automotive type fuel line? You should be using tubing for vacuum application, example what they call pulse tubing sold by Lockwood and CPS, it has thicker walls so as not to soften the vacuum impulses. The automotive type fuel line is not good as it too can compress under the pulses and soften the vacuum pulses. It also can react to the 2-stroke oil and fuel causing its layers to separate. These then can compress and reduce the strength of the vacuum pulses - no pulses equal no or reduced fuel flow. A Pennzoil rep at a past safety seminar acknowledge the 2-stroke oil together with the fuel breaks down automotive type fuel lines which is the reason you see a different type material used for fuel lines on 2-stroke marine fuel tanks. jerb At 10:29 PM 6/16/2007, you wrote: >snip... >I will replace the rubber pulse line with a plastic one to see if it helps. > >-------- >Tom Jones >Classic IV, Phase one >503, Warp >Ellensburg, WA > > >Read this topic online here: > >http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=118797#118797 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: 503 fuel pump weep hole makes a mess
From: "R. Hankins" <rphanks(at)grantspass.com>
Date: Jun 16, 2007
> I think the leaked fuel is black because it is the condensate rotax speaks of and thus requires the weep hole in aircraft fuel pumps. I think it is black because it is mostly oil. I think the fuel/oil is able to work its way up to the pump because of the weep hole. > Tom, As of today I have 423.6 hrs on my 503 with the original pulse pump. My plane is in dire need of a bath. Every drop of oil and fuel that has touched the fabric in the last few months shows up as a dark spot that has collected bugs, dust and grime. The weep hole on my fuel pump is clean as the wind driven snow. I have never seen anthing come out of that weep hole and my fuel pump is mounted a good six inches below the engine. Don't be too quick to think it is normal. Do you know someone who is running a similar pump that is not oozing. Could you talk them into letting you install their pump on your plane for an hour or so? This would sure make it easy to tell if it is simply the pump or something with the hose or engine. If you bribe them with some cold suds, you might even convince them to actually swap pumps with you. This would really clear things up in a hurry. Hang in there, you will find the problem. -------- Roger in Oregon 1992 KXP 503 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=118819#118819 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Cat36Fly(at)aol.com
Date: Jun 17, 2007
Subject: Mklllx for sale
I have just put N615RT on the market. All the particulars are on the Kolb web site but basically it would be a great trainer or check out airplane as it has full dual controls and avionics for operating in controlled airspace. It is hangered at MD1 (Massey Maryland) and never used any alcohol fuels. For more info and pictures contact me at _Cat36Fly(at)AOL.COM_ (mailto:Cat36Fly(at)AOL.COM) Larry Tasker N615RT MKlllx -582 -Warp Drive ************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: 503 fuel pump weep hole makes a mess
From: "Tom Jones" <nahsikhs(at)elltel.net>
Date: Jun 17, 2007
Okay I think You may have isolated the cause of the weep leak Jerb and others. The length of the pulse hose...and the material to some extent...is softening the pulses which allows the condensate to enter the hose. I just got a reply on the Kitfox list from a fellow with the same installation who had the same problem. His was cured by moving the pump to the front...PTO...end of the engine as suggested by a Rotax tech. The 503 pulse port is on the PTO end of the engine. The port is on the Mag end on a 582. The old Skystar manual instructs to mount the pump on the fire wall. This works fine with the 582 because the pulse port is close. The common component of those that don't leak is a short pulse line. The common component of the two I know of that leaked is the long pulse line. Thanks for all the suggestions from everyone here!!! I have a few mods to make now. -------- Tom Jones Classic IV, Phase one 503, Warp Ellensburg, WA Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=118862#118862 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: robert bean <slyck(at)frontiernet.net>
Subject: saturday
Date: Jun 17, 2007
A great day in SE PA. below: Homer cruising at 481 MSL on the model P (fer potato) DSCN1229.JPG serious business at the tables DSCN1241.JPG BB

      
      
      
________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Ms Dixie update
From: "Paul Petty" <paulpetty(at)myway.com>
Date: Jun 17, 2007
Well gang got up at 4:00am and headed to KLUL to work on Ms Dixie in hopes of a first start up after a long time and low and behold at 11:30am with a shaking right hand I turned the key and yelled "CLEAR PROP". With the airplabe tied to the Z71 she came to life and to my releif she stopped when i turned her off! Then I un-tied her and went for my first ride under her own power. The 912 puured nicely and I found my first area of adjustment...the brakes. Glad to report no leaks or problems other than the south mississippi heat. It's like a tanning bed in there! the throttle is the next area of attention as it is super touchy. at no throtle the RPM's drop to 800 and moving the throttle a fraction she jumps to 1800. It's as if she wants to jump into the air. will spen the next few days tweaking and hope to find some improvement. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RQf1WsKJSCI let me know if the link works or not regards -------- Paul Petty Kolbra #12 Ms Dixie Wating for final inspection and cert. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=118965#118965 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Ms Dixie update
From: "Paul Petty" <paulpetty(at)myway.com>
Date: Jun 17, 2007
Thanks Bob. got the other video uploaded. http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=kolbra012 -------- Paul Petty Kolbra #12 Ms Dixie Wating for final inspection and cert. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=118980#118980 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Eugene Zimmerman <etzim62(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Week end Fly-in picts
Date: Jun 17, 2007
http://picasaweb.google.com/imhisson2 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Larry Cottrell" <lcottrell(at)fmtcblue.com>
Subject: Drifting drifter
Date: Jun 17, 2007
Hi, We finally received a DVD from the guy that was taking pictures at Monument Valley as every one was leaving. He managed to capture Arty's friend make his spectacular takeoff from MV. I had the devils own time figuring out how to get it from DVD to Google. http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1486764191680773505 There was a bit of a cross wind as well as a tailwind. It looks as though he swerved a bit to the left , then over corrected. It also looks to me as though he attempted to use the ailerons to try to bring himself back. It is pretty hard to tell since the bank sloped him in that attitude. Larry C ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Richard & Martha Neilsen" <NeilsenRM(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Drifting drifter
Date: Jun 17, 2007
Larry Thanks for posting the video. I watched it a few times and I don't see me in the line of fire at all. Maybe it's for the best not knowing how close it was. I remember ducking and seeing that drifter way too close then seeing it hit a mound of dirt behind me. The wings were rocking quite a bit that doesn't show on the video and he was banked 30-40 degrees before he left the runway. The photo I snapped shows that and I think the rudder deflected also. I thought I remembered the throttle being advanced a whole lot quicker but the video proves otherwise. There really wasn't much of a cross wind but there was a tail wind. It seemed more like over controlling issue. I have to believe that you lost some detail when you put it on Google. Could you attach a before google copy to a E-Mail and send it to me off list? Rick Neilsen Redrive VW powered MKIIIC ----- Original Message ----- From: Larry Cottrell To: kolb-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Sunday, June 17, 2007 10:59 PM Subject: Kolb-List: Drifting drifter Hi, We finally received a DVD from the guy that was taking pictures at Monument Valley as every one was leaving. He managed to capture Arty's friend make his spectacular takeoff from MV. I had the devils own time figuring out how to get it from DVD to Google. http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1486764191680773505 There was a bit of a cross wind as well as a tailwind. It looks as though he swerved a bit to the left , then over corrected. It also looks to me as though he attempted to use the ailerons to try to bring himself back. It is pretty hard to tell since the bank sloped him in that attitude. Larry C ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Drifting drifter
Date: Jun 18, 2007
From: "Bill Rayfield" <bill.rayfield(at)optilogistics.com>
I think the narrator summed it up best at the end of the video.... ....."Shit!" Billyvray in GA ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: saturday
From: "Thom Riddle" <thomriddle(at)roadrunner.com>
Date: Jun 18, 2007
I agree completely. I was so glad to meet so many of the names on this lists. Homer is one fine host as well as airplane designer. Gorgeous place and great folks. The only advantage I can think of my Allegro over the Kolbs is that it enabled Bob Bean and I to make the round trip from western New York to Homer's place in one easy day of flying. Attached are a couple photos I took inside Homer's musem. Thom in Buffalo Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=119091#119091 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/dsc00318_649.jpg http://forums.matronics.com//files/dsc00317_479.jpg http://forums.matronics.com//files/dsc00314_695.jpg ________________________________________________________________________________
From: N27SB(at)aol.com
Date: Jun 18, 2007
Subject: Firefly007 Seabase
************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Richard & Martha Neilsen" <NeilsenRM(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Firefly007 Seabase
Date: Jun 18, 2007
Mighty Nice Steve Rick Neilsen Redrive VW powered MKIIIC ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Travis Brown (Kolb Aircraft)" <travis(at)tnkolbaircraft.com>
Subject: MIII CLASSIC WINDSHIELDS
Date: Jun 18, 2007
Hi Everyone I have several sheets of .125 Polycarbonate clear that are perfect for MIII Classic windshields. I would discount these to clear them out if anybody needs to replace their aged,scratched windshield. Aprox. size 35 X 48 X .125 Price EA. 45.00 $ Buyer pays S&H Travis 606 862 9692 travis(at)tnkolbaircraft.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Richard & Martha Neilsen" <NeilsenRM(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Uncle John's Fly-In in Michigan
Date: Jun 18, 2007
We had a nice fly-in here in Michigan last week end. Granted not as nice as you guys had at Homer's but a whole lot closer to me. Kolbs were well represented. About half the planes were Kolbs. There were three firestars one with a Hurth, one mkII with a 503, one MKIIIC with a VW (mine), and one MKIIIX with a Jabaru. I was fairly impressed with the Jabaru on the MKIIX. It was very smooth and quiet (it had a very effective muffler). It also had a wood Sensenich prop. The plane was loaded to gross weight or more but flew well for a direct drive engine. Maybe having the right prop is the key. Now it didn't perform like a 80 HP 912 or my redrive VW but it flew a whole lot better than my old direct drive VW did. Rick Neilsen Redrive VW powered MKIIIC ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: My Last Trip
From: "John Williamson" <kolbrapilot1(at)tx.rr.com>
Date: Jun 18, 2007
The trip I just completed lasted 7 days, covered 3151 nautical miles, logged 42.2 hours of flight time, took 257 pictures and 8 videos. Here are a couple of videos at Homer's Fly-In and a photo of one of the many reasons I fly around this country. -------- John Williamson Arlington, TX Kolbra, 912ULS http://home.tx.rr.com/kolbrapilot Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=119256#119256 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/homer_in_his_firestar_584.wmv http://forums.matronics.com//files/homer_on_his_john_deere_148.wmv http://forums.matronics.com//files/img_0137_111.jpg ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: 503 fuel pump weep hole makes a mess. Update, Fixed
From: "Tom Jones" <nahsikhs(at)elltel.net>
Date: Jun 19, 2007
I moved the pulse pump from the fire wall to the motor mount under the carbs. I replaced the 22 inch rubber pulse line with 11 inches of clear urathane pulse line. I ran the engine for about 20 minutes on the ground this morning and no sign of the leak at the punp weep hole. I then flew for 2.2 hours and still no leak. I would have never figured this out with out the list help as the original installation was according to both the kitfox construction manual and my Rotax engine installation manual. Thanks everyone!!! -------- Tom Jones Classic IV, Phase one 503, Warp Ellensburg, WA Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=119485#119485 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: My Last Trip
From: "John Williamson" <kolbrapilot1(at)tx.rr.com>
Date: Jun 19, 2007
I just finished updating my web pages with photos from this trip. Next Fly-In is 13-15 July at Nauga Field, LA. http://home.tx.rr.com/kolbrapilot/ -------- John Williamson Arlington, TX Kolbra, 912ULS http://home.tx.rr.com/kolbrapilot Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=119505#119505 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Kolb related
From: "blackbird" <blackbird754(at)alltel.net>
Date: Jun 19, 2007
Hey guys, Check this out ....On the front page of our local major newspaper that cover 4 counties here in Georgia...... My Dad almost dropped his coffee on Monday after Father's Day....He's 82....... http://savannahnow.com/node/307256 I just love flying and building these small aircraft...........37 years in autobody and my wife retired after 27 in Corporate aviation......... After a stent in me, and taking care of some financial obligations, Kolbra 004 is still coming on strong..... Stay tuned, Wayne -------- Wish I lived in the American REPUBLIC!!! Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=119556#119556 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: My Last Trip
From: "N111KX (Kip)" <n111kx(at)mindspring.com>
Date: Jun 19, 2007
Thanks for sharing, John!!! Kip -------- Kip Firestar II (born September 2000) Atlanta, GA N111KX Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=119558#119558 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 19, 2007
From: possums <possums(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: Kolb related
At 10:05 PM 6/19/2007, you wrote: > >Hey guys, > >Check this out ....On the front page of our local major newspaper >that cover 4 counties here in Georgia...... > >My Dad almost dropped his coffee on Monday after Father's >Day....He's 82....... > >http://savannahnow.com/node/307256 > >I just love flying and building these small aircraft........... That's what I would like them to say about me. "He died doing what he loved." In reality - it would probably be utter chaos . With me screaming Oh ***"!! ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Kolb related
From: "blackbird" <blackbird754(at)alltel.net>
Date: Jun 21, 2007
Well thanks, I thought that I almost made Father's day.............LOL............... I think Kolbs are great .......I have had a chance to fly a firefly.........wow...........Very sporty................ My wife says I am just a big Kid................My response...........Aren't all guys ? WT -------- Wish I lived in the American REPUBLIC!!! Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=119803#119803 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Starhill-Nauga Field Fly Around - July 13th, 14th, 15th
From: "John Williamson" <kolbrapilot1(at)tx.rr.com>
Date: Jun 21, 2007
Everything sounds real good to me. When I first mentioned this Fly-In possibility, I did not mean for you to take it on. But since you have, what can we bring to help you out? Sodas, beer, fruit or whatever, these Kolbs have hauled groceries before. Tell us what you want and we can add an item beside our names on the roster. -------- John Williamson Arlington, TX Kolbra, 912ULS http://home.tx.rr.com/kolbrapilot Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=119844#119844 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Ms Dixie update
From: "Paul Petty" <paulpetty(at)myway.com>
Date: Jun 21, 2007
Well gang went for second taxi test today and found myself more comphy with Ms Dixie. Brakes are better and noises are more fimilar to me now. Amazing how much noise transends from the tail wheel to the cabin. My throttle is one touchy SOB! I need to figure out a way to make it more manageable or just get used to it. kept RPM's above 1500 the whole time and she ran much better. First taxi test was fun second was even better as i went farther out on the ramp and the hold short area and watched a citation land and taxi by me. dialed the pitch back to 10 degrees and that seams to be better. DAR may be here saturday to do inspection and first flight may happen this weekend if things go well. I hope the bigger 6" tail wheel comes in tomorrow so i can get it mounted and see an improvement in ground handeling. Stay tuned......... -------- Paul Petty Kolbra #12 Ms Dixie Wating for final inspection and cert. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=119950#119950 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "pat ladd" <pj.ladd(at)btinternet.com>
Subject: MV
Date: Jun 22, 2007
Hi All, can any of the MV crew please tell me how it all started? Did someone pick a place at random, did someone fly in to Gouldings and just thought it looked good and talked up the idea of a fly in?. Was this years MV the 6th or 7th fly in?. I have been told both figures. Does anyone have a definitive list of plane types which were there. I have Challengers and Drifters and a Cessna and Mark 3`s but would like a breakdown of the single seaters. Please. Pat ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "boyd" <by0ung(at)brigham.net>
Subject: MV
Date: Jun 22, 2007
Hi All, can any of the MV crew please tell me how it all started? Did someone pick a place at random Pat >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pat Sept. of 2002, Erich Weaver , myself and others started a cross country trip through southern Utah. The plan was to start in Beaver Utah, the next day we were to go to Moab then to MV and Bryces National park, back to Beaver then disperse to home.... the trip went ok through Moab... then the weather in the MV area turned into thunderstorms, some of the others I had flown with down from Salt Lake City had a positive be home by date,,, with no time in the schedule for rain delays.... the agreement I had with them was,, if anyone had to go for any reason, we would all go together without complaints.... so from Moab all of the northern Utah flyers headed for home..... so that December Erich sent an email to me through the list and asked if I wanted to finish the trip... so I picked a date in May 2003, and replied,,, others on the list jumped at the idea and the gathering was on. Boyd Young MkIIIc ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Mike Welch" <mdnanwelch7(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Ms Dixie Fine Tuning
Date: Jun 22, 2007
Paul, A few years ago I restored/rebuilt a Wizard ultralight. Many pieces were missing, so I was left to come up with my own unproven designs on a couple of parts. One of the things that turned out to be in need of improvement that I built was the throttle. Mine, like yours, was touchy as a son of a gun! I had a friend test-fly my Wizard (Quicksilver clone) and he really suggested fixing it, too. By moving the push/pull point closer to the pivoting point on the throttle lever, I significantly changed the rpm range when applying power. Now, when you push the lever to increase power a 1/2" you get 50 rpm increase, instead of 300 rpm. So, instead of an overall throw of 2 1/2" I ended up with a 7" throw. (These numbers are from memory, but you get the idea.) So it is my experience, and opinion that you might really consider improving the throttle response to not being so touchy. If your set-up is like mine was, a lever you push and pulled, then all you need to do is relocate the attach point closer to the fulcrum. (Cut the distance in half and see how that acts) Of course, the overall distance of throw will limit the attach point, also. You will want to make sure you still have the full rpm capability. The geometry has to make sense!!! One more thing to consider would be the safety aspect. I believe it would be very possible to experience PIO (pilot induced oscillation) if you can't control your RPM range precisely. (That's kind of what my friend experienced. He said there was "no control", just rapid changes to much different RPM settings!) Best of "training" regarding your first flight, ( I don't believe in "luck") Mike Welch in SW Utah BTW. My shop and pool I have been building are virtually finished. All that's left on my shop is the doors I am going to make. Here's a photo with my MkIII and the GlaStar. _________________________________________________________________ Dont miss your chance to WIN $10,000 and other great prizes from Microsoft ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "David Key" <dhkey(at)msn.com>
Subject: My first Kolb on Barnstormers
Date: Jun 22, 2007
My first Kolb is on sale at Barnstormers, when I bought the plane it had "225" hours, when I sold it "320". I saw it a year ago with only "180" hours on the engine now it only has "80" hours on the engine! Of course there could be a new engine but I'd bet it's the same old 582 gray head. I'll bet there's easily over 600 hours on that engine. http://www.barnstormers.com/cat.php?PHPSESSID=c0327d2059f48a2871416ebf90255330 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Identification Plate - where to install?
From: "John H Murphy" <jhm9812(at)yahoo.com>
Date: Jun 22, 2007
I purchased the EAA kit for getting my FSII N #. Where is a good place to install this metal tag? Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=120175#120175 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: My first Kolb on Barnstormers
From: "olendorf" <olendorf(at)gmail.com>
Date: Jun 23, 2007
Thanks for the heads-up but that that link doesn't show which plane you are talking about. Please be more specific. -------- Scott Olendorf Original Firestar, Rotax 447, Powerfin prop Schenectady, NY http://KolbFirestar.googlepages.com Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=120198#120198 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Richard Pike" <richard(at)bcchapel.org>
Subject: Re: Identification Plate - where to install?
Date: Jun 23, 2007
Assuming you are referring to the data plate -This is from the EAA web site - Placement of the aircraft data plate is also covered in Part 45.11, the pertinent part of which states: [T]he aircraft identification plate must be secured to the aircraft fuselage exterior so that it is legible to a person on the ground, and must be either adjacent to and aft of the rearmost entrance door or on the fuselage surface near the tail surfaces. Note that the regulation specifically requires the data plate to be on the exterior of the aircraft. It cannot be mounted on an interior surface, even if it is visible from the outside. The regulation also stipulates that the date plate should not be attached in such a manner that it will not likely be defaced or removed during normal service, or lost or destroyed in an accident. Thus, the data plate should not be placed on an inspection cover or access door, or on any part that is commonly removed for maintenance or inspection. It should be attached to the fuselage itself. Richard Pike MKIII N420P (420ldPoops) ----- Original Message ----- From: "John H Murphy" <jhm9812(at)yahoo.com> Sent: Saturday, June 23, 2007 12:39 AM Subject: Kolb-List: Identification Plate - where to install? > > I purchased the EAA kit for getting my FSII N #. Where is a good place to > install this metal tag? > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=120175#120175 > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 23, 2007
From: "Robert Laird" <rlaird(at)cavediver.com>
Subject: Re: Identification Plate - where to install?
I put mine just an inch or two forward of the forward-most tip of the horizontal stabilizer, on the boom tube. The DAR had no complaints about that. -- Robert On 6/23/07, Richard Pike wrote: > > Assuming you are referring to the data plate -This is from the EAA web > site - > > Placement of the aircraft data plate is also covered in Part 45.11, the > pertinent part of which states: > > [T]he aircraft identification plate must be secured to the aircraft fuselage > exterior so that it is legible to a person on the ground, and must be either > adjacent to and aft of the rearmost entrance door or on the fuselage surface > near the tail surfaces. > > Note that the regulation specifically requires the data plate to be on the > exterior of the aircraft. It cannot be mounted on an interior surface, even > if it is visible from the outside. The regulation also stipulates that the > date plate should not be attached in such a manner that it will not likely > be defaced or removed during normal service, or lost or destroyed in an > accident. Thus, the data plate should not be placed on an inspection cover > or access door, or on any part that is commonly removed for maintenance or > inspection. It should be attached to the fuselage itself. > > Richard Pike > MKIII N420P (420ldPoops) > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "John H Murphy" <jhm9812(at)yahoo.com> > To: > Sent: Saturday, June 23, 2007 12:39 AM > Subject: Kolb-List: Identification Plate - where to install? > > > > > > I purchased the EAA kit for getting my FSII N #. Where is a good place to > > install this metal tag? > > > > > > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=120175#120175 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Mike Welch" <mdnanwelch7(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: New Windshields
Date: Jun 23, 2007
Hey Guys, Travis @ The New Kolb sent me a couple of sheets of the polycarbonate windshield material and it arrived yesterday. For those of you that were thinking about replacing your "glass" (ws, doors, gap seal, etc) nows a good time. I had searched extensively for "Lexan" and found it significantly more expensive than his price. Besides, we have to keep up our occasional airplane parts purchases. Lestwise we having nothing to install on our favorite toy! On a side note. Afew weeks back someone was having serious trouble with the right turn on a MkIII. Something about the flying controls.....easy to turn left, but incredibly difficult to turn right. I don't recall seeing a post resolving the problem. Whoever that was, did you get things squared away?? How about an update? Mike in SW Utah Thanks, Steve. This was quite an endeavor, building the pool, shop and 65 yds of concrete. I did almost every sq. inch of everything. (This is the kind of stuff I did for a living.) $85K change to this house in 5 months. When it is done I will no longer do construction anymore. Too old for this kind of crud! That's why I built the improvements I did. Airplane shop for me. Pool for the wife. (Although I have been known to swim, too.) In a few days, I will be able to resume building the MkIII. Yay!!!! It has been a few years, but the time has come to get 'er flying. P.S. On a different subject, I flew my 172 over to the Hurricane airport a couple of weeks ago, and lo & behold!! There was a MkIII sitting outside of a hangar. Piqued my interest, so I walked over and introduced myself, and met the pilot. It turns out this is the very same MkIII that many of you were discussing a few months back regarding an accident that made the headlines. I asked him about the accident and he really downplayed it. He it was nothing much, only a bent landing gear leg. From the looks of the rest of the plane, I would tend to agree with him. The rest of the plane looked just fine, and didn't show any signs of major repairs. Could be an another example of News Reporting sensationalism!! Like "Kolb airplane crashes, hundreds injured, dozens killed, sparks 5 wildfires, and 3 apartment fires. Global warming sure to increase now. Film at 11:00" _________________________________________________________________ Need a break? Find your escape route with Live Search Maps. http://maps.live.com/default.aspx?ss=Restaurants~Hotels~Amusement%20Park&cp=33.832922~-117.915659&style=r&lvl=13&tilt=-90&dir=0&alt=-1000&scene=1118863&encType=1&FORM=MGAC01 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "David Key" <dhkey(at)msn.com>
Subject: Re: My first Kolb on Barnstormers
Date: Jun 23, 2007
When you get to Barnstormers do a search for: BRS Chute (needs serviced) runs >From: "olendorf" <olendorf(at)gmail.com> >Reply-To: kolb-list(at)matronics.com >To: kolb-list(at)matronics.com >Subject: Kolb-List: Re: My first Kolb on Barnstormers >Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2007 06:24:27 -0700 > > >Thanks for the heads-up but that that link doesn't show which plane you are >talking about. Please be more specific. > >-------- >Scott Olendorf >Original Firestar, Rotax 447, Powerfin prop >Schenectady, NY >http://KolbFirestar.googlepages.com > > >Read this topic online here: > >http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=120198#120198 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "George T. Alexander, Jr." <gtalexander(at)att.net>
Subject: Identification Plate - where to install?
Date: Jun 23, 2007
John et al: I did the same as Robert.... Just forward of the horiz stab. A word of caution..... Make sure that you have your paperwork back BEFORE you do the engraving of the data plate. Make sure that the data elements that are called for on the plate are engraved EXACTLY as they appear on the registration. If the paperwork says "FS II" engraving "Firestar II" won't work. Fun! Safe Flying! George Alexander FSII N709FS http://gtalexander.home.att.net -----Original Message----- From: owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-kolb-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Robert Laird Sent: Saturday, June 23, 2007 10:21 AM Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Identification Plate - where to install? I put mine just an inch or two forward of the forward-most tip of the horizontal stabilizer, on the boom tube. The DAR had no complaints about that. -- Robert On 6/23/07, Richard Pike wrote: > > Assuming you are referring to the data plate -This is from the EAA web > site - > > Placement of the aircraft data plate is also covered in Part 45.11, > the pertinent part of which states: > > [T]he aircraft identification plate must be secured to the aircraft > fuselage exterior so that it is legible to a person on the ground, and > must be either adjacent to and aft of the rearmost entrance door or on > the fuselage surface near the tail surfaces. > > Note that the regulation specifically requires the data plate to be on > the exterior of the aircraft. It cannot be mounted on an interior > surface, even if it is visible from the outside. The regulation also > stipulates that the date plate should not be attached in such a manner > that it will not likely be defaced or removed during normal service, > or lost or destroyed in an accident. Thus, the data plate should not > be placed on an inspection cover or access door, or on any part that > is commonly removed for maintenance or inspection. It should be attached to the fuselage itself. > > Richard Pike > MKIII N420P (420ldPoops) > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "John H Murphy" <jhm9812(at)yahoo.com> > To: > Sent: Saturday, June 23, 2007 12:39 AM > Subject: Kolb-List: Identification Plate - where to install? > > > > > > I purchased the EAA kit for getting my FSII N #. Where is a good > > place to install this metal tag? > > > > > > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=120175#120175 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Ms Dixie Fine Tuning
From: "Paul Petty" <paulpetty(at)myway.com>
Date: Jun 23, 2007
Thanks Mike! as of today we looked at the pivot point on the throttle lever at the main connection and there is plenty of room to get the connection closer to the center of the rear quadrant.....Kolbras work the throttle from the rear seat lever via a push pull tube to the front seat. what the upper cable slot is and it's attach point is still a mystry to me! -------- Paul Petty Kolbra #12 Ms Dixie Wating for final inspection and cert. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=120263#120263 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Original FireStar For Sale
From: "Bill Griffin" <uldad(at)aol.com>
Date: Jun 24, 2007
Original FireStar FOR SALE. Currently apart for re-build. Wings, cage, and ailerons need cover, otherwise ready to go. Cage painted w/Aerothane Insignia White, boom tube is Pontiac Red, tail section is red and white white sunburst. Rotax 447 (approx. 260 hrs), Warp Drive prop, 4130 gear legs, MATCO rims fitted with external band brakes, Kuntzleman strobes. 10 gal fuel tank built by Jim Hauck. Jim also added extra fabric bracing to round out the bottom of the cage (looks a LOT like John's plane). Located in Montgomery, AL. First $5500 takes it, photo attached. I want to build a Legend Cub (http://www.txsport.aero/default.asp) and need the shop space. This has been a very good airplane and I'd really like it to go to another Kolb builder. Bill Griffin 334-279-9899 home 334-265-8251 work 334-312-5266 cell Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=120343#120343 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/firestar_184.jpg ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Ms Dixie Fine Tuning
From: "blackbird" <blackbird754(at)alltel.net>
Date: Jun 24, 2007
Hey Paul, I think the throttle part you described is from the OLD days.......LOL On a two stroke it was used for the choke (enricher) circuit.......... I know......only on two strokes..............LOL Mystery solved................ WT -------- Wish I lived in the American REPUBLIC!!! Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=120372#120372 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Wanted: Ultrastar Wings In Pa or NJ
From: "Tinman" <uwil(at)aol.com>
Date: Jun 24, 2007
I'm new to the board and am looking for Ultrastar wings in the Pennsylvania or New Jersey Area. Thanks Bill uwil(at)aol.com Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=120392#120392 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Malcolmbru(at)aol.com
Date: Jun 24, 2007
Subject: Re: Wanted: Ultrastar Wings In Pa or NJ
when you get hard up enough to consider buying some in michigan let me know. malcolm ************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "T McCarthy" <mccarthy(at)jefnet.com>
Subject: W & B help on original Firestar
Date: Jun 25, 2007
I need some help on a W&B for my original 377 Firestar. I decided to N# the plane after flying over 300 hrs. I have done the calculations as per the original Kolb info and come out way aft heavy. The range is 10" to 18.75" from LE, but I get 23.35" with standard pilot. Just to clarify, I have done several W&B calculations before, and have checked my numbers, weights,and measurements twice, but I must be doing something wrong, as the plane fly's nose heavy without the aid of elevator trim tabs. If anyone has actual numbers to compare with mine, please email me so I can call. Thanks in advance. Tom McCarthy Firestar Original 377 529 Hrs, soon to be N441TM N514TM Zenith 601HD, 72 Hrs kit built ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Larry Cottrell" <lcottrell(at)fmtcblue.com>
Subject: Re: web site promoting flight safety.
Date: Jun 25, 2007
----- Original Message ----- From: Arksey(at)aol.com To: kolb-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Monday, June 25, 2007 8:49 AM Subject: Kolb-List: web site promoting flight safety. Hello Group, Thought I would pass this web site on to you. It is called OVER THE AIRWAVES and purpose is to promote flight safety by Bob Miller, comes out bi weekly and is a free sign up. Has some good info and comes to you via the interenet by email. http://overtheairwaves.com/ Thanks for the link, I signed up. Larry C ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 25, 2007
From: "Richard Girard" <jindoguy(at)gmail.com>
Subject: Re: W & B help on original Firestar
Tom, I hate doing W & B when the datum is called out such that you end up with negative numbers. My guess is someplace you have a negative as a positive or vice versa. :-) Rick On 6/25/07, T McCarthy wrote: > > I need some help on a W&B for my original 377 Firestar. I decided to N# > the plane after flying over 300 hrs. I have done the calculations as per > the original Kolb info and come out way aft heavy. The range is 10" to > 18.75" from LE, but I get 23.35" with standard pilot. Just to clarify, I > have done several W&B calculations before, and have checked my numbers, > weights,and measurements twice, but I must be doing something wrong, as the > plane fly's nose heavy without the aid of elevator trim tabs. If anyone has > actual numbers to compare with mine, please email me so I can call. Thanks > in advance. > > Tom McCarthy > Firestar Original 377 529 Hrs, soon to be N441TM > N514TM Zenith 601HD, 72 Hrs kit built > > * > > > * > > -- Rick Girard "Ya'll drop on in" takes on a whole new meaning when you live at the airport. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: flymichigan(at)comcast.net
Subject: Re: FirestarII for sale
Date: Jun 26, 2007
________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Third Anniversary Of Third Alaskan Flight
Date: Jun 26, 2007
Morning Gang: This morning, three years ago, I departed Gantt International Airport, Alabama, for Leadville, Colorado, Point Barrow, Dead Horse, Kaktovik, Alaska, and Tuktoyaktuk, North West Territory, Canada. I returned 48 days later. For the benefit of the new folks on the Kolb List since that time, here is a short article and some photos of that trip published in the Alabama Aviator web page: http://www.alabamaaviator.com/isaa.asp?id=72867 At the beginning of the article you will find "See photo gallery". Click on that to see larger copies of the photos. john h mkIII - 2,660.2 hours 912ULS - 91.7 hours ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Chuck Stonex <cstonex(at)msn.com>
Subject: Third Anniversary Of Third Alaskan Flight
Date: Jun 26, 2007
Good job John. Very impressive. I read theses articles from the Kolb and Ch allenger list and it is easy to understand why these are my first two choic es for an ultralight or kit plane. I learned to fly in a T Bird at the fact ory in De Soto IA.LEBTFChuck > From: jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com> To: kolb-list(at)matronics.com> Subject: Kolb-Li st: Third Anniversary Of Third Alaskan Flight> Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 06:54 r.com>> > Morning Gang:> > This morning, three years ago, I departed Gantt International Airport, > Alabama, for Leadville, Colorado, Point Barrow, De ad Horse, Kaktovik, > Alaska, and Tuktoyaktuk, North West Territory, Canada . I returned 48 > days later.> > For the benefit of the new folks on the Ko lb List since that time, > here is a short article and some photos of that trip published in the > Alabama Aviator web page:> > http://www.alabamaavia tor.com/isaa.asp?id=72867> > At the beginning of the article you will fin d "See photo gallery". > Click on that to see larger copies of the photos.> =====> > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: HShack(at)aol.com
Date: Jun 26, 2007
Subject: Re: Third Anniversary Of Third Alaskan Flight
In a message dated 6/26/2007 7:55:31 AM Eastern Daylight Time, jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com writes: This morning, three years ago, I departed Gantt International Airport, Alabama, for Leadville, Colorado, Point Barrow, Dead Horse, Kaktovik, Alaska, and Tuktoyaktuk, North West Territory, Canada. I returned 48 days later. This in no way equals John's accomplishment, but 3 of our Trenton Flyers just today reached Prudhoe Bay [sp], Alaska by motorcycles. They began approx. 40 days ago from Trenton, SC. Some of the locals at Prudhoe claim it's the first Honda Goldwing they've ever seen there. By the time they get back they will have covered over 14,000 miles. Check out our website at _www.trentonflyers.com_ (http://www.trentonflyers.com) , then click on "trenton flyers Alaska" to view some gorgeous photo's of the trip. More to follow. Also, click on the "members" tab then "Robert Broadwell" to see maybe the prettiest Kolb Mklll float plane in existance. Howard Shackleford FS II SC ************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: EIS 4000
From: "Paul Petty" <paulpetty(at)myway.com>
Date: Jun 26, 2007
Fellow Kolbers, I could probbaly dig this up in the archives but the list is kinda slow and me and Ms Dixie need to learn a little about each other. Learing the EIS is at the top of the list right now. Sandy (great person) tells me today that my EIS has 16 pages of display information, this is about 14 pages more info than i need or want at this point in the ball game. She said to call her when im sitting in the airplane and we can disable up to 10 pages and set 2 pages up to display the info i need/want. I dont have my notes near by or i could give more detail but from memory the only AUX i used was for the coolant temp sensor. What i have onboard Ms Dixie is as follows. RPM,coolant temp,fuel level, 2-cht's, 4 egt's oil temp ,oil pressure, voltage output. That is all i can think of right now. My thinking is to have the main page display RPM/Coolant temp/Fuel level/CHT (highest) on the top row and oil pressure/oil temp/egt (highest)/voltage output on the bottom row. as for the other six pages that cant be disabled which are pages 5-8-14-10 I can use the favorite and "next" and previous to see what i want. Sound like a plan guys/girls? http://www.grtavionics.com/images/M46_Fig1A.GIF -------- Paul Petty Kolbra #12 Ms Dixie Wating for final inspection and cert. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=120802#120802 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "pat ladd" <pj.ladd(at)btinternet.com>
Subject: Re: Third Anniversary Of Third Alaskan Flight
Date: Jun 27, 2007
I'd like to do that trip on a bike, I think, some day soon before I get to old for the task.>> Hi John, Go soon. I don`t know what the insurance situation is in the USA compared to here. More relaxed I suspect as in most things.. For my birthday last year, 77th, Wendy bought for me a ride on a Harley. She found that because of my age the company would not let me drive the bike so I had to settle for a pillion ride. Finding that she was going to be left kicking her heels for a couple of hours she booked a pillion ride for herself. We finally managed to fit the ride in last week. It was quite awkward as the company was in Kent and it meant an overnight away to be there early in the mornng. We got kitted out in the leathers and hemet and enjoyed a tour around the very attractive small villages in the Weald of Kent in quite reasonable weather. We finished up with a fast run back to base. Wendy, on her pillion was doing 104 mph when I passed her on my pillion doing 110 mph. Not bad for a road within 15 miles of the centre of London with a maximum speed limit of 70 mph. No speeding tickets have arrived yet. I would say that contrary to my expectations, the Harleys were rubbish. They looked fantastic. Gleaming paintwork and shining chrome (4000 worth on one bike) but the ride, in spite of soft armchair type seats and sprung rear wheels the ride was no better than the last bike I had in the early `50`s. I would like to get on a newly designed bike such as a Honda or a BMW to see what a really modern bike is like but I wouldn`t have a Harley as a gift. I enjoyed looking through your Alaska pics again. Thanks for reminding me of them. Cheers Pat ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Ultrastar Opinions
Date: Jun 27, 2007
| I'm 225lbs, would there be any issues with my weight in an Ultrastar? | Ray Ray (who?): How old is the US? Was tube seal used in the fuselage tubes when the aircraft was built? 4130 steel does not resist rust. Can't see inside all those large and small 4130 tubes. john h mkIII ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Ultrastar Opinions
Date: Jun 27, 2007
| I don't pretty up my planes with paint until I have worked the bugs out, so after I have flown it a couple times I can restore it with a nice paint job. | | Is there a way of testing the fabric to see if it needs replacement? | | I looks and feels strong and has been stored out of the sunlight. | | -------- | Ray Ray: Sounds like you need to get some manuals on polyfiber covering process. Your questions reference fabric indicate you could use some good sound info. john h mkIII ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "David Kulp" <undoctor(at)ptd.net>
Subject: Re: Third Anniversary Of Third Alaskan Flight
Date: Jun 27, 2007
Man does this stoke up the memories fire!! My best cycle trip ever was on my BMW K100LT to AK. Rode 11,014 miles in 22 days (plus 30 hours up the inside passage on the ferry stopping to spend my first weekend out with my sister and b in law, Gladi Kulp and Jon Pond, in Juneau) and got as far north as the Atigun Pass in the Brooks Mt. Range on the Haul Rd. >From Fairbanks up to the pass and return in one day was 666 miles, 590 of them gravel. At that time it was a private road some miles north of Cold Foot. The college kid in the "guard" shack stopped me but I promised him I'd be "right back." Of course there were no services above Cold Foot so I had to terminate my trespassing at the pass in order to make it back to Cold Foot for gas. Headed E from Tetlin Jct toward the Yukon Terr going home. Stopped at Chicken, AK ( chickenalaska.com ) for supper. Chatted with the owners for a while and asked where they lived before they bought Chicken. "You never heard of it," she replied, "It's a little town in the lower 48. New Hope, Pennsylvania." Blew me away and she was shocked, as well, to learn I was from Lansdale, just about 18 miles away. Other "small world" encounters too numerous to mention. If any of you have considered doing Alaska, DO IT!! Don't wait, it's a whole new world, and if you get to Juneau, stop at the AK State Library and say hi to Gladi. She'd enjoy meeting any of you Kolb owners and enthusiasts, especially since she's family of the founder. Best regards, Dave Kulp Bethlehem, PA ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "summersg" <summersg(at)gmail.com>
Subject: Aileron Forces
Date: Jun 27, 2007
I have a Firestar II and note that the roll rate is very low and the stick forces in a roll relatively high. The archives indicate that spades are not appropriate for this aircraft. Some people have reduced the chord length (front to rear) from some 15 to 9 inches to lighten the stick forces. I would like some more information from people who have done this to Kolb aircraft and, in particular, how a new chord length determined (e.g., would 12 or 16 inches work better/ worse). Thanks. 11:54 PM ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Gary Knapp" <gary56(at)sover.net>
Subject: What are you Guys Runnin For Gas?
Date: Jun 27, 2007
My firestar is all put back together, sittin in the Hanger and ready to go. The Mechanic that Annuals my friends (and CFI) Cub, Tri Pacer, and Cherokee 140, "Annualed" my Firestar and gave it a thumbs up. Said he was reading an article about adverse effects of automotive gasoline on 2 stroke engines due to the alcohol content. No doubt this has been discussed and beat to death. I apologize in advance for not payin attention. Just wondered what other folks are runnin for fuel in their Rotax? Also lookin for any info to an annual Fly In over New Hampshire way? Thanks!! Gary ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Ultrastar Opinions
Date: Jun 27, 2007
| Yes, I have never dealt with a fabric covered aircraft before, any tips will be welcome. | | Were all Kolb Ultrastars covered with polyfiber? | | How long does it last if keeping the plane tied out in the sun. | | -------- | Ray Ray: You need to do some research. Flying is a dangerous business, especially fabric covered airplanes. They do not fly well without covering. Here is a good place to start your fabric education: Aircraft Technical Support, Inc. Call Jim and Dondi Miller toll free at 1-877-877-3334 BTW: That is a toll free number. Polyfiber has a good manual that will give you enough info to cover your airplane and have a good idea of what you are doing. john h mkIII ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Aileron Forces/Handing Out Advice
Date: Jun 27, 2007
| I think the aileron size has been optimized by the designer, I would play with the mechanical parts and try carefully adjusting those a bit at a time until you are happier with the forces. | | Just 2 cents from a test pilot. | | -------- | Ray Ray: Are you a "Kolb" test pilot? If I have paid attention to your posts, you are in the "try and get this Ultrastar flying" stage. I do not know what your Kolb background is, other than that. Good idea to qualify ourselves when we start handing out advice to others on how they should modify their Kolbs, especially flight controls. I, for one, try never to hand out advice, although I do have a little experience flying and building these little rascals. I find it best to share with others what I have done with my own Kolb, what the results were, then let them decide if my info is useful. Many new folks come to the Kolb List and immediately start handing out info on an airplane they have never flown or built. There are a lot of unsuspecting new members on this List that will grab any info they get their hands on and take off with it, not knowing how valid that info is. We all need to be keenly aware of this. john h mkIII ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Richard & Martha Neilsen" <NeilsenRM(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Aileron Forces
Date: Jun 27, 2007
I'm going to stick my neck out here and tell you what I think. I wouldn't for a second consider reducing the cord of the ailerons or as a few have done move the pivot point of the aileron bell crank in to reduce the deflection of the ailerons. My MKIIIC ailerons require a fairly high force to deflect them at high speeds but when I really need them, low speed and near the ground, they are much lighter. Our Kolbs aren't aerobatic airplanes and as such don't need roll rates of 90 degrees per second. These planes do need powerful ailerons at slow speeds when we are doing takeoffs and landings. I can't always fly in perfect weather so if I get caught in turbulence near the ground I want as much control as I can get. If the control forces are high enough that I have to muscle them a bit that is much better than hitting the control stop wishing I had more. As for spades I don't think anyone that knows how they work would say they are not appropriate. The problem has been building them so that they work well and maybe not too well. I noticed Craig Nelson has a small set attached to the balance weights on his MKIIIX and stated that they were too small. There has been some discussion that there are complex wind patterns at the wing tips that complicates or maybe eliminates the effectiveness of these spades. I know of a Firestar II that had spades on them (mid span below the wing) at one time and the reports were that they worked very very well. There were concerns of stressing the aileron hinges so they were removed. Another concern would be that the ailerons could be deflected further at high speeds than the wing or ailerons were designed to handle. If you think about it Homer designed them to be effective at low speeds yet keeping the pilot from damaging the airframe at high speeds. My $.02 worth Rick Neilsen Redrive VW powered MKIIIC ----- Original Message ----- From: summersg To: Kolb-List(at)matronics.com Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2007 2:57 PM Subject: Kolb-List: Aileron Forces I have a Firestar II and note that the roll rate is very low and the stick forces in a roll relatively high. The archives indicate that spades are not appropriate for this aircraft. Some people have reduced the chord length (front to rear) from some 15 to 9 inches to lighten the stick forces. I would like some more information from people who have done this to Kolb aircraft and, in particular, how a new chord length determined (e.g., would 12 or 16 inches work better/ worse). Thanks. 6/26/2007 11:54 PM ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "flykolb" <flykolb(at)wowway.com>
Subject: Re: Ultrastar Opinions
Date: Jun 27, 2007
John H. I have a great deal of respect for your flying abilities but sometimes you are a little short with others.(:-) Ray is doing research - that's one of the advantages of the Kolb List. Someone should be able to just tell him how to check the fabric to see if he can safely fly with his current fabric until he needs to recover. He is not asking for complete covering info. Jim ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2007 4:14 PM Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Re: Ultrastar Opinions > > | Yes, I have never dealt with a fabric covered aircraft before, any > tips will be welcome. > | > | Were all Kolb Ultrastars covered with polyfiber? > | > | How long does it last if keeping the plane tied out in the sun. > | > | -------- > | Ray > > > Ray: > > You need to do some research. Flying is a dangerous business, > especially fabric covered airplanes. They do not fly well without > covering. > > Here is a good place to start your fabric education: > > Aircraft Technical Support, Inc. Call Jim and Dondi Miller toll free > at 1-877-877-3334 > > BTW: That is a toll free number. > > Polyfiber has a good manual that will give you enough info to cover > your airplane and have a good idea of what you are doing. > > john h > mkIII > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 27, 2007
From: Dana Hague <d-m-hague(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: What are you Guys Runnin For Gas?
At 04:08 PM 6/27/2007, jb92563 wrote: > >91 octance autofuel for the Cuyunna430 on the Ultrastar. > >The moisture content of the fuel due to alcohol may be the cause for some >corrosion of internal parts, but I am told that it is virtually negligable >and probably the moisture content of your local air is a greater risk than >the fuel. I think the concern regarding alcohol in the fuel is more from its potential effects on nonmetallic parts (tubing, pumps, seals, etc.) than any corrosion issues. -Dana -- -- Most politicians aren't crooks, but the ones that are sure are making the other 10 percent look bad. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Richard Pike" <richard(at)bcchapel.org>
Subject: Re: Aileron Forces
Date: Jun 27, 2007
Go look at this page for the Firestar II: http://www.bcchapel.org/pages/0003/FSII%20ailerons.html and this one for the MKIII: http://www.bcchapel.org/pages/0003/pg7.htm It's simple, it works, if you don't like it, put it back like it was. Richard Pike MKIII N420P (420ldPoops) ----- Original Message ----- From: summersg To: Kolb-List(at)matronics.com Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2007 2:57 PM Subject: Kolb-List: Aileron Forces I have a Firestar II and note that the roll rate is very low and the stick forces in a roll relatively high. The archives indicate that spades are not appropriate for this aircraft. Some people have reduced the chord length (front to rear) from some 15 to 9 inches to lighten the stick forces. I would like some more information from people who have done this to Kolb aircraft and, in particular, how a new chord length determined (e.g., would 12 or 16 inches work better/ worse). Thanks. 6/26/2007 11:54 PM ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Aileron Forces
Date: Jun 27, 2007
I'm going to stick my neck out here and tell you what I think. Rick Neilsen Hi Rick: Excellent post. Glad you stuck your neck out. Reference "aileron spades", I, personally, would not put them on my mkIII, or any other model Kolb. I have not found a requirement to crank the ailerons, lock to lock, at higher speeds. Just the opposite. Homer Kolb told me many years ago to fly it gently, input a little roll and she would roll right up. Just be patient. Had a very experienced friend die in a Firestar wing failure. I believe part of that failure was caused by aileron spades creating more stress than the 5 rib wing panel could handle. Some of us have been able to cause wing failures without spades on the old 5 rib wings. Take care, john h mkIII ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 27, 2007
From: william wheet <wheetfly(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: What are you Guys Runnin For Gas?
Gary Bill The X Pers. The Yul flyin is 7/7---7/14 --- Gary Knapp wrote: > > > My firestar is all put back together, sittin in the > Hanger and ready to go. > The Mechanic that Annuals my friends (and CFI) Cub, > Tri Pacer, and Cherokee > 140, "Annualed" my Firestar and gave it a thumbs up. > Said he was reading an article about adverse effects > of automotive gasoline > on 2 stroke engines due to the alcohol content. > No doubt this has been discussed and beat to death. > I apologize in advance for not payin attention. > Just wondered what other folks are runnin for fuel > in their Rotax? > > Also lookin for any info to an annual Fly In over > New Hampshire way? > Thanks!! > > Gary > > > > > browse > Subscriptions page, > FAQ, > http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List > > Web Forums! > > > > > Bill Wheet Buxton, Me. FsII 503 Looking for a deal? Find great prices on flights and hotels with Yahoo! FareChase. http://farechase.yahoo.com/ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Ultrastar Opinions/Fabric Testing
Date: Jun 27, 2007
| I do not claim to be any sort of UStar expert... but I doubt that is | scratched on a rock | anyplace that all Kolb US's were covered with polyfiber... | Beauford Bill T: Enjoyed your informative post. Agree, there were a lot of older Kolbs that did not have suffcient UV block applied based on keeping the weight to a minimum. Had several fabric specimens fabric tested at FSU School of Home Economics many years ago. My first airplane was an US. Did not have a hanger, so I kept it tied down in the cow pasture with a couple strands of barbed wire strung around it to keep the cows from rubbing all the paint off of it and the calves from testing their taste buds. After more than a year of continuous exposure I had a new piece of unprocessed fabric tested, a piece that had been processed but not exposed, and a piece off the top of a wing. The machine used to test the fabric was a "pull tester" All specimens of fabric tested out nearly as strong as the new nonexposed to UV fabric. I used no aluminum poly spray, but had the UV block added to clear Aerothane. It worked. That was the only time I used that method. The Firestar and mkIII were subjected to several heavy coats of Polyspray. john h mkIII ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Ultrastar Opinions
Date: Jun 27, 2007
| Ray is doing research - that's one of the advantages of the Kolb List. | Jim Jim (who?): Thanks for your opinion. My opinion is the man needs to learn something about fabric and aircraft. Based on his comments, he knows very little. When I built my first airplane, the 1984 Ultrastar, I had zero knowledge of aircraft fabric and finishing techniques. The best source of info at that time was Ray Stitts manual on fabric covering and finishing. We got one with our covering kits that were included in the aircraft kit. That is where I learned how to cover, finish, and repair fabric. Seems to me, Ray?? could get a great deal of info out of the newer manual produced by Polyfiber. That is why I recommended he call Jim and Dondi Miller, toll free, and get a copy of it. If that was not "sugar coated" enough for you, I am very sorry. However, I am not accustomed to that kind of interaction. When it comes to airplanes and flying, I would rather someone come across as a straight shooter than be any where near wishy washy. ;-) Take care, john h mkIII PS: I just returned from dragging my airstrip to flatten a ton of cow manure, so it will dry and I can fly this evening. Not a bad job, and someone has to do it. Besides, it gives me an excuse to crank up one of those old tractors that are older than me and most of you all. The down side of dragging manure is.............the old gals and young'ns will turn around and do it all over again. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Mike Welch" <mdnanwelch7(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Funny Stories
Date: Jun 27, 2007
John H, Reading your post regarding runways and manure brings back memories of my good friend, Frank, and his story of having to land in a cow pasture. Besides his very animated description of the cow's foot potholes knocked him about during the roll-out, he went on to describe the incredibly unpleasant result of hitting cow patties at 30 mph with his landing wheels. OMG He had us rolling on the ground laughing!!!! And he just stands there with little bits of pasture shrapnel all over his clothes and face! Still makes me laugh, just thinking about it. Mike in SW Utah Oh, BTW. This same Frank is why I ever became involved with Kolbs. He purchased an UltraStar that was rotted away and rebuilt it. He is, without a doubt, one of the best welder's around. He actually converted the UltraStar to being a top-mount motor, by reversing the location of the boom tube. In essence, he created a FireStar out of an U-Star. _________________________________________________________________ Dont miss your chance to WIN $10,000 and other great prizes from Microsoft ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "flykolb" <flykolb(at)wowway.com>
Subject: Re: Ultrastar Opinions
Date: Jun 27, 2007
Jim m ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2007 6:09 PM Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Re: Ultrastar Opinions > > > | Ray is doing research - that's one of the advantages of the Kolb > List. > > | Jim > > > Jim (who?): > > Thanks for your opinion. > > My opinion is the man needs to learn something about fabric and > aircraft. Based on his comments, he knows very little. > > When I built my first airplane, the 1984 Ultrastar, I had zero > knowledge of aircraft fabric and finishing techniques. The best > source of info at that time was Ray Stitts manual on fabric covering > and finishing. We got one with our covering kits that were included > in the aircraft kit. That is where I learned how to cover, finish, > and repair fabric. Seems to me, Ray?? could get a great deal of info > out of the newer manual produced by Polyfiber. That is why I > recommended he call Jim and Dondi Miller, toll free, and get a copy of > it. If that was not "sugar coated" enough for you, I am very sorry. > However, I am not accustomed to that kind of interaction. When it > comes to airplanes and flying, I would rather someone come across as a > straight shooter than be any where near wishy washy. ;-) > > Take care, > > john h > mkIII > > PS: I just returned from dragging my airstrip to flatten a ton of cow > manure, so it will dry and I can fly this evening. Not a bad job, and > someone has to do it. Besides, it gives me an excuse to crank up one > of those old tractors that are older than me and most of you all. The > down side of dragging manure is.............the old gals and young'ns > will turn around and do it all over again. > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: EIS 4000
From: "Paul Petty" <paulpetty(at)myway.com>
Date: Jun 27, 2007
it has been stated here many times but once more i must say Sandy at GRT is awesome! I got to the airport and was sitting in Ms Dixie at 7:00am local so i could call her at opening. took less than 35 min for her to "walk" me through the set up and I am now happy with my EIS! -------- Paul Petty Kolbra #12 Ms Dixie Wating for final inspection and cert. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=120988#120988 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 27, 2007
From: "Jack B. Hart" <jbhart(at)onlyinternet.net>
Subject: Re: Aileron Forces
>I have a Firestar II and note that the roll rate is very low and the stick forces in a roll relatively high. The archives indicate that spades are not appropriate for this aircraft. Some people have reduced the chord length (front to rear) from some 15 to 9 inches to lighten the stick forces. I would like some more information from people who have done this to Kolb aircraft and, in particular, how a new chord length determined (e.g., would >12 or 16 inches work better worse). Thanks. Hi, I have an early FireFly on which I replaced the fifteen inch chord ailerons with nine inch chord ailerons after flying it just four hours. Later I modified the control linkages. This greatly improved roll rate and reduced stick pressures. It turned an around the patch quiet air machine into an any time of the day machine. It is a pure delight to fly in rough air. It effortlessly forward or side slips. The only thing, that I gave up was a little wing area, and I had to accept a small increase in stall speed. I got the stall speed back with vortex generators. There is a misconception that large ailerons are better. But roll rate is influenced by the change in the angle of the wing chord as the aileron is deflected. If you have a long chord aileron, the dynamic loading will be high and stick pressure will higher than it needs to be at any speed. By reducing the aileron chord, the dynamic loading goes down for the same aileron deflection and stick pressure goes down too. I don't know if this will help you with your Firestar, but you can see some more at: http://www.thirdshift.com/jack/firefly/firefly26.html If you make new ailerons save your old ones in case you need to put them back one. I still have mine in the barn. They have about seven years of dust on them. The nine inch chord came about in the following way. I hangared in a communal hangar and they were cementing the floor. I helped to move and pack planes so two bays would be open for the concreters. I got out my measuring tape and measured wing and aileron chords. And using an incline meter, I measured aileron up and down deflections. All of these aircraft flew very well with much less aileron length and total aileron deflection. Be careful, and fly safe. Jack B. Hart FF004 Winchester, IN ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Aileron Forces
From: "JetPilot" <orcabonita(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Jun 27, 2007
The aileron forces on the Kolb MK III are unreasonably high, and I have also been working to reduce my Aileron Forces... The Kolb is not an aerobatic airplane and does not need to roll fast, but there is no reason in the world that the roll should be hard and require a lot of effort. First problem is in the linkage design, Kolbs have WAY TO MUCH travel built into the ailerons. My Kolb MK III Xtra had 40 degrees of up aileron which is as much or more than a highly aerobatic Extra 300. This is a design error by Kolb and needs to be fixed... I found even than in crosswinds etc, I never used anywhere near full stick. Secondly, anything past 25 or 30 degrees travel turns into drag, and does not give you more control. The easy way to fix this on a MK III is to shorten where the aileron rods attach at the rear of the fuselage as seen in the attached picture, but this brings other problems. First, it increases the angle of the aileron control rods to the point where they are pushing out as much as they are pushing the aileron up and down, so some of what you gained is also wasted. Secondly, it increases the aileron differential to an unreasonable amount. In other words, you get a lot of up, but very little down aileron the more you move these rods in.. Not good and I did not use this method to lighten my control forces. My solution was to drill a hole in the bottom of the stick, and shorten the aileron attach point to the stick, resulting in less throw and less force without all the disadvantages of the other methods. In the picture, I just drilled another hole above hole where the bolt that attaches to the stick, moving the attachment point up. This picture was before the modification, you can clearly see how much extra room there is to drill a higher hole. Spades would be great, I plan on doing this when I have time. As far as stress, that is a matter of having the skill and judgement not to yank hard and overstress the ailerons at high speed, but that is the case with almost any airplane you fly. Big control inputs at high speeds are bad, from ultraights to airliners... Thats called pilot technique. I dont need rock hard control forces to keep me from doing something stupid. I would rather have an easy to fly airplane that does not tire me out quickly. I would NOT shorten the ailerons, that reduces wing area and aileron area. There is no need to do this with other better, and easier options avialable. -------- "NO FEAR" - If you have no fear you did not go as fast as you could have !!! Kolb MK-III Xtra, 912-S Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=121017#121017 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/dsc02191_711.jpg http://forums.matronics.com//files/dsc02177_357.jpg http://forums.matronics.com//files/dsc02174_116.jpg ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Aileron Forces
From: "lucien" <lstavenhagen(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Jun 27, 2007
I havn't flown a MKIII yet, but my FS II's aileron forces are very light. In fact, it has the lightest control forces that I've flown to my recollection, especially in roll. My titan for example has spades on it, but still requires significantly more muscle in roll than my firestar II. It's very easy for me to get the stick over to the stop at any speed. The torque rod from the stick going back to the bellcrank for the aileron pushrods seems to flex twist-wise, limiting the aileron movement at cruise speeds even with the stick pegged all the way to the stop. With gap seals on the ailerons, there's still a fair bit of roll authority. It doesn't roll like a pitts to be sure, but it's still pretty good. But I used to think this was goofy with the stick over at the stop but the aileron barely deflecting. But having researched it more, I'd bet if more force were able to be applied to the ailerons, it would probably exceed design limits probably in the hinges and perhaps in the wing panels. And they do move more at lower speeds, where more movement is needed, due to the lower airspeeds.... So... JMO...I'd say no mods to the ailerons or the linkage are really needed or should be attempted, I think it's operating as designed and works best as is. Gaps seal are specified for the ailerons, which I make out of shipping tape and replace about once a year. This greatly improves the aileron response over a non-sealed gap... I can't explain it, I just love this airplane. My titan will fly circles around it literally but in calm weather my Kolb with it's little 503 screamer is what I prefer to fly by far..... LS -------- LS FS II Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=121020#121020 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "pat ladd" <pj.ladd(at)btinternet.com>
Subject: Re: Funny Stories
Date: Jun 28, 2007
incredibly unpleasant result of hitting cow patties at 30 mph with his landing wheels.>> Hi the problem with cow manure, as well as the smell, is the hardness to which it dries. Landing through manure is bad enough but at least you can clean it off before it dries. Taking off through it and having to hack it off when you land is a different story. Ask me how I know! Cheers Pat ________________________________________________________________________________
From: robert bean <slyck(at)frontiernet.net>
Subject: Re: Aileron Forces
Date: Jun 28, 2007
I moved mine in about half of Richard P's distance and was happy with the result. Plenty of control and just the right stick resistance. Like he says, if not what you want, just move them back. BB MkIIIc, suzuki 3 cyl, 65" powerfin ________________________________________________________________________________
From: N27SB(at)aol.com
Date: Jun 28, 2007
Subject: Re: Aileron Forces
In a message dated 6/27/2007 10:25:36 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, jbhart(at)onlyinternet.net writes: I have an early FireFly on which I replaced the fifteen inch chord ailerons with nine inch chord ailerons after flying it just four hours. Later I modified the control linkages. This greatly improved roll rate and reduced stick pressures. It turned an around the patch quiet air machine into an any time of the day machine. It is a pure delight to fly in rough air. It effortlessly forward or side slips. The only thing, that I gave up was a little wing area, and I had to accept a small increase in stall speed. I got the stall speed back with vortex generators. Hi Jack, A few years ago when we were re covering my Firefly I asked Homer about the big Ailerons. He recommended that I reduce them to 9". It made a big difference in FF 007 and very little change in other areas due to reduced wing area. Steve FF 007 ************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Ms Dixie update
From: "Paul Petty" <paulpetty(at)myway.com>
Date: Jun 28, 2007
Gang, Just got word that Ms Dixie is set to get her airworthyness inspection this Saturday at 9:00am. Will keep you posted do not archivie -------- Paul Petty Kolbra #12 Ms Dixie Wating for final inspection and cert. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=121094#121094 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 28, 2007
From: "Jack B. Hart" <jbhart(at)onlyinternet.net>
Subject: Re: Aileron Forces
From: N27SB(at)aol.com A few years ago when we were re covering my Firefly I asked Homer about the big Ailerons. He recommended that I reduce them to 9". It made a big difference in FF 007 and very little change in other areas due to reduced wing area. Steve, Did Homer tell you why nine inch chord was a good number? Jack B. Hart FF004 Winchester, IN ________________________________________________________________________________
From: N27SB(at)aol.com
Date: Jun 28, 2007
Subject: Re: Aileron Forces
In a message dated 6/28/2007 5:17:54 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, jbhart(at)onlyinternet.net writes: Steve, Did Homer tell you why nine inch chord was a good number? Jack B. Hart FF004 Winchester, IN No he did not. 9" was the current standard. Remember, Homer did not design the Firefly. steve ************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 28, 2007
Subject: Re: Aileron Forces
From: "Jim Dunn" <jim@tru-cast.com>
I moved the flaperon linkages inboard 3/4" on my Firefly tonight (original 15" flaperon chord). If you do yours, make sure you measure the new hole positions from the centerline, not the outboard edge of the arm. Turns out the arm was not welded on centerline and one arm is longer than the other. Difference is about 1/8". Still better than it was. Air was smooth as silk after sunset. Thanks to this list for the suggestion. Jim N. Idaho ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Starhill-Nauga Field Fly Around - July 13th, 14th, 15th
From: "John Williamson" <kolbrapilot1(at)tx.rr.com>
Date: Jun 29, 2007
The Fly-In is only 2 weeks away! I guess you can tell I'm ready. If you haven't signed up or called John B, do it now so you will get fed. List of those that plan to attend so far: John Williamson John Hauck Gary Haley Steven Green Paul Petty Charlie Harris See you there. -------- John Williamson Arlington, TX Kolbra, 912ULS http://home.tx.rr.com/kolbrapilot Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=121215#121215 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Mike Welch" <mdnanwelch7(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Dual controls
Date: Jun 29, 2007
Hey Group, I was wondering if I can get someone with a M3X with dual controls to take a few close up photos of the control mechanism for me. I presently have a center single control stick, and I plan on converting it to "dual controls". I sure would appreciate it!! Thanks, Mike in SW Utah _________________________________________________________________ Picture this share your photos and you could win big! http://www.GETREALPhotoContest.com?ocid=TXT_TAGHM&loc=us ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Dual controls
Date: Jun 29, 2007
| I presently have a center single control stick, and I plan on converting | it to "dual controls". | Thanks, Mike in SW | Utah Mike: If your counterfit project fails, give Travis a call at TNK, he'll be glad to send you the complete setup. I think they are still a bolt in kit. john h mkIII with the first set of dual controls in a Kolb. Still working after 2,660+ hours. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Mark IIIC won't turn right in straight and level
Date: Jun 29, 2007
You're saying, he tightened the cables to the rudder and | elevator and THAT fixed his problem?? | | Appreciate it, Mike in SW Utah Mike: He tightened up the tail wires. Most folks fly around with them loose as a clothes line. They need to be tight enough to twang like a guitar string. There is a lot of activity going on back there, and loose tail wires agrevate problems. Here is what John B said: "I had been >suggesting that he tighten up his tail cables and he did it a couple >of >times, just never tight enough. Finally, got them tight enough and >problem >solved." Here is how I check to see if my tail wires are tight enough for me. 1-Grab the leading edge of either horizontal stabilizer with one hand, and the leading edge of the upper vertical stabilizer with the other. 2-Now..........try to pull the two leading edges together. In the process of pulling them together, if the wire at the station you are pulling goes slack, to me, that indicates it needs to be tightened up to the point that it will not sag when a pretty good pull is put on the system. john h mkIII with tight tail wires. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 29, 2007
From: "Richard Girard" <jindoguy(at)gmail.com>
Subject: HKS update ATTN:Dave Bigelow
Dave, Just thought I'd check in and see how your HKS is doing. I'm up to little over 20 hours and I'm beginning to figure the little engine out. I have finally figured out how to synchronize the carburetors and thought you might be interested in what I've found. First off, does your engine have a balance line between the two manifolds? Is it the latest ASTM compliant engine? Mine isn't, and the installation and operation manuals that came with my engine are the same revision level as those available online. As I recall, you have the vertical ( HKS terminology) intake manifolds with the carburetor over the head. These were apparently offered, as a pair, with a vacuum port on one intake manifold or on both. I say apparently because this is not documented. The installation manual has a fuel system diagram showing a single vacuum tap for the fuel pump and the text speaks of this, too (section 6.0 Fuel System and figure 5). However, newer pictures of the engine on the web site show a balance line between the manifolds. I have the horizontal intake manifolds, with the carburetor level with the head. They have a vacuum tap on each manifold for a balance line between them and are also undocumented. Bottom line is this. The carburetor synchronizing instructions in the operations manual do not work if you have a balance line connecting the two intakes pneumatically. The balance tube does just as its name implies and does it quite well, too, making it impossible to synch the carbs. In my case, I was getting nice even vacuum readings and the engine seemed smooth. Then, I used the technique for the Rotax 912 (Line Maintenance Manual, chapter 12-00, pages 18 through 20) and the results were startling. There was a 3" difference in vacuum readings at 3000 RPM once the intake manifolds were isolated. Correcting this by adjusting the long throttle cable, and nothing else, increased the RPM to 3500. In flight, my cruising RPM, where Meadowlark can maintain level flight in still air, dropped from 4700 to 4500 RPM and max RPM at WOT went up to 6200 from 6100. I was also able to decrease idle RPM from 1750 to 1600. The manual recommends a 1400 RPM idle, but even with the carbs synched as close as I can get them I find it too rough. Because Meadowlark, having a very large wing, is so slow, most of the power of the HKS isn't used. Climb power is abundant, but I haven't been able to get in a dawn flight to measure still air ROC. The flip side of the low power cruise is excellent economy. I flew a total of 4.5 hours on the last tank that included a couple of evenings of pattern work for a total of 20 landings in that time. Refilling the tank took a little over 8 gallons. Once the rain stops, I'll get some fuel consumption numbers for the new tuning. Rick -- Rick Girard "Ya'll drop on in" takes on a whole new meaning when you live at the airport. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: HKS update ATTN:Dave Bigelow
Date: Jun 29, 2007
In flight, my cruising | RPM, where Meadowlark can maintain level flight in still air, dropped from | 4700 to 4500 RPM | | Rick Rick: Could you explain the above change in performance. I don't understand how balancing carbs has anything to do with rpm setting and maintaining level flight. Thanks, john h mkIII ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: HKS update ATTN:Dave Bigelow
From: "Dave Bigelow" <up_country(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Jun 30, 2007
Rick, My HKS came with the balance line between the two intake manifolds. When I balanced the carbs with two vacuum gauges, I figured that the balance procedure couldn't work properly with the balance line open. I plugged the balance line, and then did the balance procedure. I have almost 25 hours on the engine now, and can't say much except it just works. Cruise RPM for the Firestar II is in the range of 4,800 - 5,100 RPM, depending on altitude. I haven't flown any one flight over 2.5 hours, but it looks to me like I should get slightly over 4 hours flying time on 10 gallons of gas. I'm really liking the engine, and have made several flights now over terrain that would have made me very uncomfortable with the 503. I'm suprised that Kolb doesn't offer the engine as an option for the FS II. -------- Dave Bigelow Kamuela, Hawaii FS2, HKS 700E Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=121322#121322 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: HKS update ATTN:Dave Bigelow
From: "lucien" <lstavenhagen(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Jun 30, 2007
What prop do you run, type and diameter? Do you have any details on mounting? i.e. any mods you had to make etc.? It's interesting that the HKS weighs only slightly more than my 503 + C box. I've thought off and on about an HKS since I live at 7000'. I flew my FS II yesterday evening in 9000+ density altitude and, er, lots of full throttle was required ;). So more climb power would be appreciated... The HKS seems to be doing well, I've seen it offered more often, some trike manufactureres like Air Creation are starting to offer that motor on some of their models... LS -------- LS FS II Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=121333#121333 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 30, 2007
From: "Richard Girard" <jindoguy(at)gmail.com>
Subject: Re: HKS update ATTN:Dave Bigelow
John, Look at it as though there are two separate engines hooked together. One cylinder is running at -3" Hg vacuum, the other at -6" Hg vacuum. Opening the throttle on the cylinder with the higher vacuum brings the vacuum down and the rpm on that cylinder increases. As the vacuum readings are brought into synch the overall horsepower of the engine produced increases. In my case the increase in horsepower was enough that the engine was producing the same HP at 4500 RPM that it had at 4700 RPM when the carbs were out of synch. Rick On 6/29/07, John Hauck wrote: > > > In flight, my cruising > | RPM, where Meadowlark can maintain level flight in still air, > dropped from > | 4700 to 4500 RPM > | > | Rick > > > Rick: > > Could you explain the above change in performance. > > I don't understand how balancing carbs has anything to do with rpm > setting and maintaining level flight. > > Thanks, > > john h > mkIII > > -- Rick Girard "Ya'll drop on in" takes on a whole new meaning when you live at the airport. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Subject: Re: HKS update ATTN:Dave Bigelow
Date: Jun 30, 2007
| In my case the increase in horsepower was enough that the engine | was producing the same HP at 4500 RPM that it had at 4700 RPM when the carbs | were out of synch. | | Rick Does that mean you repitched the prop to compensate for the increase in hp? john h mkIII ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 30, 2007
From: "Richard Girard" <jindoguy(at)gmail.com>
Subject: Re: HKS update ATTN:Dave Bigelow
Prop pitch is next on the list to be evaluated, however, if I don't exceed 6200 RPM in climb, I'll leave it as is. The nature of the wing is such that I cannot do a full RPM check in level flight. Rick On 6/30/07, John Hauck wrote: > > > | In my case the increase in horsepower was enough that the engine > | was producing the same HP at 4500 RPM that it had at 4700 RPM when > the carbs > | were out of synch. > | > | Rick > > > Does that mean you repitched the prop to compensate for the increase > in hp? > > john h > mkIII > > -- Rick Girard "Ya'll drop on in" takes on a whole new meaning when you live at the airport. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: HKS update ATTN:Dave Bigelow
From: "lucien" <lstavenhagen(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Jun 30, 2007
John Hauck wrote: > | In my case the increase in horsepower was enough that the engine > | was producing the same HP at 4500 RPM that it had at 4700 RPM when > the carbs > | were out of synch. > | > | Rick > > > Does that mean you repitched the prop to compensate for the increase > in hp? > > john h > mkIII I'm slightly confused as well - is that at full throttle at these rpms? LS -------- LS FS II Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=121347#121347 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 30, 2007
From: "Richard Girard" <jindoguy(at)gmail.com>
Subject: Re: HKS update ATTN:Dave Bigelow
Lucien, My HKS is installed on a trike (weight shift control aircraft). 4700 RPM is far below engine redline (5800 RPM continuous), but the nature of the flex wing doesn't allow me to do full power and level flight at the same time. Rick On 6/30/07, lucien wrote: > > > John Hauck wrote: > > | In my case the increase in horsepower was enough that the engine > > | was producing the same HP at 4500 RPM that it had at 4700 RPM when > > the carbs > > | were out of synch. > > | > > | Rick > > > > > > Does that mean you repitched the prop to compensate for the increase > > in hp? > > > > john h > > mkIII > > > I'm slightly confused as well - is that at full throttle at these rpms? > > LS > > -------- > LS > FS II > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=121347#121347 > > -- Rick Girard "Ya'll drop on in" takes on a whole new meaning when you live at the airport. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Starhill-Nauga Field Fly Around - July 13th, 14th, 15th
From: "John Williamson" <kolbrapilot1(at)tx.rr.com>
Date: Jun 30, 2007
Updated the attending list and added a name. . . John Williamson John Hauck Gary Haley Steven Green Paul Petty Charlie Harris Bruce & Tina Williams Ken Korenek . . -------- John Williamson Arlington, TX Kolbra, 912ULS http://home.tx.rr.com/kolbrapilot Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=121406#121406 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 30, 2007
From: Bob Noyer <a58r(at)verizon.net>
Subject: Evelyn "Mama Bird" Johnson
Just a had a nice call from Miz Evelyn. Those of you who know her will be pleased to hear that she has been back at work as FBO at Morristown TN in spite of the loss of part of a leg, from a traffic accident last year. At 97, she's a real piece of work. As a flight instructor she has logged more hours, trained more pilots, and given more FAA exams than any other pilot. She will honored at the National Aviation Hall of Fame on 7/21/07, Dayton OH. Clik on http:// tinyurl.com/ygzjsz Any one have a dark suit and a $150 in disposable spondulix? regards, Bob N. FireFly 070 Old Kolb http://www.angelfire.com/rpg/ronoy/ ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Ms Dixie update
From: "Paul Petty" <paulpetty(at)myway.com>
Date: Jun 30, 2007
however paper work was not in order. I highly recomend to anyone useing a IA or DAR to request a form of "needed" documents WAY before hand. I had to go find a notary on a Saturday morning to whitness my signature on a paper that states I built the airplane. Not an easy thing to do in a small town but i got-her-done. Next was I had no airframe log book. A MUST in my case and with good luck we found a new un-used one! Most have posted that the check out lasted less than an hour.. mine started at 9:00am and finished at 2:30pm. This was mainly in part to 1. DAR was old flying buddy of Charley and 2 my lack of paperwork. Heck he spent more time drooling over the RV8 than he did checking out the Kolbra. Ken Reeves and Ms. Bobby came over for the event and we had a great visit. It was a long HOT 24 hr day to get her done but we are good to go. BTW Ms. Dixie weighed in at 590lbs Empty... this was a shocking discovery as i was thinking more along the lines of 700 lbs with all the mods. W&B revealed that she is out of CG with full fuel and a 175 pilot solo front seat but were not sold on the numbers given to us and will re check this over closely. Ben a long day and Im' going to shower and soak in the pool for an early start in the morning for a possible "First flight" some time after 08.00 we will see.... -------- Paul Petty Kolbra #12 Ms Dixie Wating for final inspection and cert. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=121425#121425 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Kolb Flyer
From: "grabo172" <grabo172(at)sc.rr.com>
Date: Jun 30, 2007
Just saw this on TNK website! Any idea on a price? http://www.tnkolbaircraft.com/index.html -------- -Erik Grabowski Kolb Firestar N197BG CFI/CFII/LS-I Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=121441#121441 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Mike Welch" <mdnanwelch7(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: Dual controls
Date: Jun 30, 2007
John H. Who in the hell made you God, and said it was okay for you to say any insulting "mightier than thou" comment you want? The last time I checked, this sport we engage in was called "Experimental" aviation, whereby anyone can test their talents and they have the freedom to do as they darn well please when it comes to building and maintaining an aircraft they choose. They can build, improve upon, alter, and even simply assemble, whatever their little heart desires. And I would have also thought they would have been free from ridicule and condescension, just because their choices don't match your approval. While your allegiance to Kolb and all things original equipment has been well stated, I really don't believe others should have to endure snide comments from you. I am not trying to be confrontational, but I'll be damned if I'll just stand by and be insulted on my choices to build my airplane. You don't have that right. And if you want to continue THIS pissing match back copy, you have my email address. (And phone number 435-817-1816) >From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com> >Reply-To: kolb-list(at)matronics.com >To: >Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Dual controls >Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 17:24:55 -0500 > > > | I presently have a center single control stick, and I plan on >converting >| it to "dual controls". > | Thanks, >Mike in SW >| Utah > > >Mike: > >If your counterfit project fails, give Travis a call at TNK, he'll be >glad to send you the complete setup. I think they are still a bolt in >kit. > >john h >mkIII with the first set of dual controls in a Kolb. Still working >after 2,660+ hours. > > _________________________________________________________________ Like puzzles? Play free games & earn great prizes. Play Clink now. http://club.live.com/clink.aspx?icid=clink_hotmailtextlink2 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "David Key" <dhkey(at)msn.com>
Subject: Re: Dual controls
Date: Jun 30, 2007
Heres one. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "David Key" <dhkey(at)msn.com>
Subject: Re: Starhill-Nauga Field Fly Around - July 13th, 14th,
15th
Date: Jun 30, 2007
Pencil me in for a maybe. Sometimes work has their way with me and spoils all my fun. I should know something on the 10th or so. David Key ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: HKS update ATTN:Dave Bigelow
From: "Dave Bigelow" <up_country(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Jul 01, 2007
lucien, > What prop do you run, type and diameter? Do you have any details on mounting? i.e. any mods you had to make etc.? > Using a Powerfin 66 inch 2 blade with the HKS 2.58:1 gearbox. It's the same prop I used with the B Box Rotax 503. I did have to dial in some more pitch to keep the RPM under red line. I pitched so I would reach red line at full throttle at 55 mph. I did the project with the help of Jerry Olenick at Green Sky Adventures. He has all the mounting info, pictures,etc, and is planning on offering a bolt-on kit. I did the entire conversion without drilling any extra holes or cutting or welding the Firestar stock mounts. It is literally a "bolt on" conversion. -------- Dave Bigelow Kamuela, Hawaii FS2, HKS 700E Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=121497#121497 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: HKS update ATTN:Dave Bigelow
From: "lucien" <lstavenhagen(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Jul 01, 2007
jindoguy(at)gmail.com wrote: > Lucien, My HKS is installed on a trike (weight shift control aircraft). 4700 RPM is far below engine redline (5800 RPM continuous), but the nature of the flex wing doesn't allow me to do full power and level flight at the same time. > > Rick > Understood, so am curious how you know you're now getting more hp at 4500 than you were before at 4700? Not sure how this can be determined at anything other than full throttle and even then without some relatively sophisticated means of measurement? Or is the throttle setting vastly lower now than it needed to be before or ? You should be able to do a full power run in level flight by pulling the bar all the way in, if you don't exceed Vne in the process. I got my fun racer up to over 80mph that way with the XP11 wing fitted, though it had some more to go still.... With the single surface, it'd still climb 500fpm at full power with the bar all the way in though. I flew trikes for about 4 years too, I loved em, but I'm glad to be back in 3-axis ;) LS -------- LS FS II Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=121521#121521 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: HKS update ATTN:Dave Bigelow
From: "lucien" <lstavenhagen(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Jul 01, 2007
Dave Bigelow wrote: > lucien, > > > > What prop do you run, type and diameter? Do you have any details on mounting? i.e. any mods you had to make etc.? > > > > Using a Powerfin 66 inch 2 blade with the HKS 2.58:1 gearbox. It's the same prop I used with the B Box Rotax 503. I did have to dial in some more pitch to keep the RPM under red line. I pitched so I would reach red line at full throttle at 55 mph. > > I did the project with the help of Jerry Olenick at Green Sky Adventures. He has all the mounting info, pictures,etc, and is planning on offering a bolt-on kit. I did the entire conversion without drilling any extra holes or cutting or welding the Firestar stock mounts. It is literally a "bolt on" conversion. Ah, the Olenik's, ok.... Can't do better than working with those guys. I had Tom Olenik do maintenance on a couple of my 503's and he does just superb work..... They're doing lots of good support on the HKS now too. I do have a spare powerfin 68" in 3-blades. Does the HKS turn right hand in pusher config like the 2-stroke? hmm... I'll have to keep that prop around then ;) LS -------- LS FS II Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=121523#121523 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: HShack(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 01, 2007
Subject: Re: Dual controls
In a message dated 6/30/2007 9:59:14 PM Eastern Daylight Time, mdnanwelch7(at)hotmail.com writes: John H. Who in the hell made you God, and said it was okay for you to say any insulting "mightier than thou" comment you want? WOW! What a touchy guy! Some people don't want to hear the truth. Howard Shackleford FS II SC ************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Ms Dixie First flight
From: "Paul Petty" <paulpetty(at)myway.com>
Date: Jul 01, 2007
Well guys with Charley at the controls at 7:45am this morning Ms Dixie left the ground and flew like any Kolb aircraft should fly. No problems to report and he made a womderful landing. http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=kolbra012 Video is here and Im sorry for the length of dead air time but i dont know how to edit it down yet Enjoy! -------- Paul Petty Kolbra #12 Ms Dixie Time to make first flight! Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=121550#121550 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 01, 2007
From: "Larry Bourne" <biglar(at)gogittum.com>
Subject: Re: Ms Dixie First flight
Congratulations, Paul. You earned that, and it's gotta be a good feeling. When do you plan to take it up yourself ?? Lar. On 7/1/07, Paul Petty wrote: > > > Well guys with Charley at the controls at 7:45am this morning Ms Dixie > left the ground and flew like any Kolb aircraft should fly. No problems to > report and he made a womderful landing. > > http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=kolbra012 > > Video is here and Im sorry for the length of dead air time but i dont know > how to edit it down yet > > Enjoy! > > -------- > Paul Petty > Kolbra #12 > Ms Dixie > Time to make first flight! > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=121550#121550 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Ms Dixie First flight
From: "Paul Petty" <paulpetty(at)myway.com>
Date: Jul 01, 2007
Mike and Jazz, I havent flown this type aircraft except one demo flight at TNK with Brian with me in the back seat. I am not current and in no way ready to fly this airplane. Charley (my father-n-law and co owner/builder) was the man for the job with over 20K plus hrs and over 5K tail wheel time. From advice from our good friends John Hauck,John Williamson, Mark german and John Bickham, Charley was the only canidate. I would have loved to make the maiden flight however I'm simply not ready. As for the future it is now time for me to dive back into training and learn how to fly a Kolbra aircraft. 40 hrs well 39 now, need to be flown off with our 30 mile test area and while that is being done I will get the rest of my training done and hope to get my SP ticket in Ms Dixie. -------- Paul Petty Kolbra #12 Ms Dixie Time to make first flight! Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=121599#121599 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 01, 2007
From: "Jack B. Hart" <jbhart(at)onlyinternet.net>
Subject: Re: Dual controls
> >"The last time I checked, this sport we engage in was called >"Experimental" aviation, whereby anyone can test their talents and >they have >the freedom to do as they darn well please when it comes to building >and >maintaining an aircraft they choose. They can build, improve upon, >alter, >and even simply assemble, whatever their little heart desires" > > >Mike W: > >Guess the request for photos to copy the Kolb dual controls hit me the >wrong way. > >The first dual controls in a Kolb aircraft were designed and >fabricated by my Brother Jim and a good friend of ours, that is no >longer with us. This was done in 1991. I would like to add that it >took 4 iterations of the controls to come up with a good, workable set >that I have been flying with since 1992, and what TNK started shipping >with their kits. Old Kolb came up with a set of dual controls that >did not work well, some time after we had successfully gotten ours >flying. Soon after TNK got their organization operating, Brother Jim >made a set of jigs for our dual controls and gave them to TNK. > >I apologize for my comment. Should have thought a little longer >before I reacted. I hope this will help explain my poor choice of >words in response to your request for photos of the dual controls. > >john h >mkIII > John, For continuity of the thread, I believe this should be part of the archive. Jack B. Hart FF004 Winchester, IN ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Fuel Flow Rate
From: "lucien" <lstavenhagen(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Jul 01, 2007
planecrazzzy wrote: > Hey Guys, > My fuel flow rate seems to be worst since I changed from > > 3 blade ( IVO ) to 2 blade.... > > My CHT is 250 ....EGT 1080..... > > I don't think changing the Needles would be good , because my > > Tempertures seem to be almost perfect..... > > Before , at 5900 , I'd burn around 4.0 - 4.5 at cruise > > Now it's more like 4.5 - 5.1..... I'm hauling azz at the same 5900 > > but I'm paying for it in fuel flow.... > > > Just thought I'd throw this out there and see what you guy think... > > Gotta Fly... > Mike & "Jaz" in MN Ok, going to p*** some guys off because I'm going against the books, but safety first.... On the CHT for the 447 and 503: the temp range for the CHTs given in the Rotax manual is wrong. Do NOT attempt to run CHT's hotter than about 350F. The engine WILL sieze at about 410F and consistent operation at 375F up will bring that TBO down a BUNCH. On a broken-in 503, the CHT's should sit at around 300F. If you're working the motor hard, 310 to 320F will be seen and is ok. On the 447, you'll see 320 to 330F at typical cruise and it'll run up to 350F in a climb. that's ok too. BUT, if you seen CHT's hotter than 350F on a consistent basis on either engine, you've got a problem that needs to be addressed. Ok, now that that's out of the way.... 1080 on the EGT at cruise is fine, it's even ok at full throttle, though I like to see between 1000 and 1050 at WOT. What is probable is that you have more load on the motor at cruise now. This was a similar result I got with my IVO when I flew it on my trike. I took off a blade and the EGT's went down about 50F at cruise due to the additional load at the same RPM's (I cruised about 5300rpm on that plane). 5900 rpm on a regular basis is working the engine a little hard (what's your cruise speed at that rpm) on a FS II (is that your plane?), so fuel burn that high doesn't surprise me. I run about 5300 to 5400 rpm on my FSII (about 60mph) and burn about 3gph.... LS -------- LS FS II Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=121622#121622 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: HKS update ATTN:Dave Bigelow
From: "Roger Lee" <ssadiver1(at)yahoo.com>
Date: Jul 01, 2007
Hi Rick, Good post. I have been trying to get everyone to do a pneumatic sync. Just doing a mechanical sync. is no substitue. Two different critters. The mechanical sync only sets the idle screws and does not adjust the cables. The pneumatic sync. doesn't touch the idle screws, but adjust the unevenness of the cables. Don't forget to turn the idle mixture screws (on the underside of the carbs) on the Rotax 912 1.5 turns during the mechanical sync. If you don't do a pneumatic sync then one side of the engine is trying to run at a different rpm from the other side. A pneumatic sync can effect the engine vibration, temps, hp and rpm depending on how far out they are. I have had people fly in to Tucson so I could do a complete sync. The last one was a Zenair and he was 4" of vacumm out and he couldn't tell by the running engine. I have people call me all the time on how to do a sync and talk them through it while they are at the airport. -------- Roger Lee Tucson, Az. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=121628#121628 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Fuel Flow Rate
From: "George Alexander" <gtalexander(at)att.net>
Date: Jul 01, 2007
Kolbers & Kolbettes: For what it is worth........ Lucien's numbers are a close representation of what I experience.... FS II, 75 hours, R503, dual carb, DCDI, C box, Powerfin, 3 blade 68". Hardly worth mentioning, but for normal operations..... 1 TO, cruise for a while, 1 Landing..... burn rate is just under 2.75gph. Got these results this morning in SW FL where the OAT was 84 at 0715. (Didn't check the OAT while cruising, but it wasn't much different at 1500MSL than it was on the ground 27 MSL.) George Alexander N709FS http://gtalexander.home.att.net lucien wrote: > > planecrazzzy wrote: > > Hey Guys, > > My fuel flow rate seems to be worst since I changed from > > > > 3 blade ( IVO ) to 2 blade.... > > > > My CHT is 250 ....EGT 1080..... > > > > I don't think changing the Needles would be good , because my > > > > Tempertures seem to be almost perfect..... > > > > Before , at 5900 , I'd burn around 4.0 - 4.5 at cruise > > > > Now it's more like 4.5 - 5.1..... I'm hauling azz at the same 5900 > > > > but I'm paying for it in fuel flow.... > > > > > > Just thought I'd throw this out there and see what you guy think... > > > > Gotta Fly... > > Mike & "Jaz" in MN > > > > > On a broken-in 503, the CHT's should sit at around 300F. If you're working the motor hard, 310 to 320F will be seen and is ok. On the 447, you'll see 320 to 330F at typical cruise and it'll run up to 350F in a climb. that's ok too. > > BUT, if you seen CHT's hotter than 350F on a consistent basis on either engine, you've got a problem that needs to be addressed. > > Ok, now that that's out of the way.... > > 1080 on the EGT at cruise is fine, it's even ok at full throttle, though I like to see between 1000 and 1050 at WOT. > > > > > I run about 5300 to 5400 rpm on my FSII (about 60mph) and burn about 3gph.... > > LS -------- George Alexander http://gtalexander.home.att.net Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=121665#121665 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 01, 2007
From: Charlie England <ceengland(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: Ms Dixie First flight
Paul Petty wrote: > > Mike and Jazz, > > I havent flown this type aircraft except one demo flight at TNK with > Brian with me in the back seat. I am not current and in no way ready > to fly this airplane. Charley (my father-n-law and co owner/builder) > was the man for the job with over 20K plus hrs and over 5K tail wheel > time. From advice from our good friends John Hauck,John Williamson, > Mark german and John Bickham, Charley was the only canidate. I would > have loved to make the maiden flight however I'm simply not ready. As > for the future it is now time for me to dive back into training and > learn how to fly a Kolbra aircraft. 40 hrs well 39 now, need to be > flown off with our 30 mile test area and while that is being done I > will get the rest of my training done and hope to get my SP ticket in > Ms Dixie. > > -------- Paul Petty Kolbra #12 Ms Dixie Time to make first flight! > > Congrats on the successful 1st flight, but even more kudos on your exceptionally good judgment. If more homebuilders were to make that kind of logical, rational analysis, we'd have fewer dead homebuilders & bent airplanes. Way to go! Charlie Slobovia Outernational Airport ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Fuel Flow Rate
From: "lucien" <lstavenhagen(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Jul 01, 2007
planecrazzzy wrote: > Basicly , I'm going off what John said for Best Performance > > 5,800 RPM / 75% power for the 503... > > Maybe , I'll take a little pitch out of it.....and put the R's back to 6500 > > > Gotta Fly... > Mike in MN, FSII / N381PM Agreed that 5800 continuous is running the motor a bit hard. It won't really hurt it in the short term, though it may eventually take a few hours off the TBO down the line, as well as burn more gas than you really have to. The "sweet spot" on the 503 is about 5400 rpm for cruise (i.e. according to Mark Smith who's been running/servicing the Rotaxen for several decades). 6500 is a good maximum for climb, though on my FS II, I have to run the pitch too fine in cruise if I prop for 6500 on climbout. A good compromise on mine has been 6300-6350 for climbout, then I can run around 5300 to 5400 at an about 60mph cruise. LS -------- LS FS II Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=121704#121704 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Kolb Flyer
From: "lucien" <lstavenhagen(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Jul 01, 2007
grabo172 wrote: > Just saw this on TNK website! Any idea on a price? > > http://www.tnkolbaircraft.com/index.html > > A lot...... The SLSA like these seem to run around 80 to 100k. I could build a titan AND a Kolbra for scratch like that and have lots more plane in each one ;).... Sorry, couldn't resist... look like a nice plane tho... LS -------- LS FS II Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=121705#121705 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 01, 2007
From: Charlie England <ceengland(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: Fuel Flow Rate
planecrazzzy wrote: > > Hey Guys, > My fuel flow rate seems to be worst since I changed from > > 3 blade ( IVO ) to 2 blade.... > > My CHT is 250 ....EGT 1080..... > > I don't think changing the Needles would be good , because my > > Tempertures seem to be almost perfect..... > > Before , at 5900 , I'd burn around 4.0 - 4.5 at cruise > > Now it's more like 4.5 - 5.1..... I'm hauling azz at the same 5900 > > but I'm paying for it in fuel flow.... > > > Just thought I'd throw this out there and see what you guy think... > > Gotta Fly... > Mike & "Jaz" in MN > Assuming that your original prop was anything close to correct for the airframe: If the only thing you changed was the prop, and now you are going faster, then your fuel burn will be higher; it's simple physics. Power required goes up at something like the cube of the airspeed change. If you had a manifold pressure gauge, it would almost certainly read higher than before as you are going faster at the same RPM. Think about a manual shift car in 1st gear or 5th gear. 2000 rpm in 1st gear burns less gas than 2000 rpm in 5th gear, because you aren't going as fast & the engine isn't working as hard. More speed (power) costs more fuel. How much do you want to spend? :-) Charlie ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: HKS update ATTN:Dave Bigelow
From: "JetPilot" <orcabonita(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Jul 01, 2007
Roger Lee talked me through the carb sync for my 912-s, and it needed it !!! Once you understand the procedure, its very straight foward and easy to do. The only hard thing is getting the small hose clamps back on the balance tube after you are done [Evil or Very Mad] Thanks Roger !!! Mike -------- "NO FEAR" - If you have no fear you did not go as fast as you could have !!! Kolb MK-III Xtra, 912-S Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=121710#121710 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Dual controls
From: "JetPilot" <orcabonita(at)hotmail.com>
Date: Jul 01, 2007
I would have to also suggest that you buy the dual controls from TNK. They work perfectly, and will save you a lot of work that has already been done by others. Aside from the obvious advantages of dual sticks in training, if the stick breaks off in your hand while you are flying, you can just reach over and fly with the other stick [Laughing] Given the amount of time it will take you to develop and scratch build these dual controls, you will be better off to work some overtime and buy the dual controls from Kolb and bolt them on. Here are some pictures of mine, maybe after seeing this you will like the factory ones so much that you might just buy them. Mike -------- "NO FEAR" - If you have no fear you did not go as fast as you could have !!! Kolb MK-III Xtra, 912-S Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=121713#121713 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/ultralightmikekolbdetail12_20_2006_161_521.jpg http://forums.matronics.com//files/ultralightmikekolbdetail12_20_2006_148_561.jpg http://forums.matronics.com//files/ultralightmikekolbdetail12_20_2006_147_211.jpg ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "pat ladd" <pj.ladd(at)btinternet.com>
Subject: Re: Ms Dixie First flight
Date: Jul 02, 2007
Congratulations. Looks fine Pat ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Ms Dixie First flight
From: "Ralph B" <ul15rhb(at)juno.com>
Date: Jul 02, 2007
Congratulations Paul after all this time building! This day has long been coming and now you can look forward to the fruits of your labors. This aircraft will last you the rest of your life if you take care of it. Ralph B -------- Ralph B Original Firestar 20 years flying it Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=121741#121741 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Mike Welch" <mdnanwelch7(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: Dual controls
Date: Jul 02, 2007
Mike, Thank you for your insightful and well explained information, describing the dual control system from Kolb. I definitely agree the factory built mechanism is truely a beautiful example of quality design and workmanship (for which John H. was involved in the design). I think you have a valid point, too, for the time and experimentation, it probably wouldn't be worth the trouble to try to fabricate my own system. I apologize for lashing out at John. It's just that I do tend to try to "build my own" on occation and I felt offended that he insinuated I wasn't "legitimate" or I somehow "stole" something. I do trust my talents at making a very workable version of almost anything I decide to build. I fabricate all kinds of products. I can weld, fiberglass, upholster, (among other trades) many things. (A bonafide Inspector Gadget). But, as you pointed out, this might be a time when it might not be worth the effort. Again, my apologies to John, and thanks to you for a well thought out response. Mike Welch >From: "JetPilot" <orcabonita(at)hotmail.com> >Reply-To: kolb-list(at)matronics.com >To: kolb-list(at)matronics.com >Subject: Kolb-List: Re: Dual controls >Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 20:31:41 -0700 > > >I would have to also suggest that you buy the dual controls from TNK. They >work perfectly, and will save you a lot of work that has already been done >by others. Aside from the obvious advantages of dual sticks in training, >if the stick breaks off in your hand while you are flying, you can just >reach over and fly with the other stick [Laughing] > >Given the amount of time it will take you to develop and scratch build >these dual controls, you will be better off to work some overtime and buy >the dual controls from Kolb and bolt them on. > >Here are some pictures of mine, maybe after seeing this you will like the >factory ones so much that you might just buy them. > >Mike > >-------- >"NO FEAR" - If you have no fear you did not go as fast as you >could have !!! > >Kolb MK-III Xtra, 912-S > > >Read this topic online here: > >http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=121713#121713 > > >Attachments: > >http://forums.matronics.com//files/ultralightmikekolbdetail12_20_2006_161_521.jpg >http://forums.matronics.com//files/ultralightmikekolbdetail12_20_2006_148_561.jpg >http://forums.matronics.com//files/ultralightmikekolbdetail12_20_2006_147_211.jpg > > _________________________________________________________________ Who's that on the Red Carpet? Play & win glamorous prizes. http://club.live.com/red_carpet_reveal.aspx?icid=REDCARPET_hotmailtextlink3 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: HKS update ATTN:Dave Bigelow
From: "Roger Lee" <ssadiver1(at)yahoo.com>
Date: Jul 02, 2007
Hi Mike, Your Welcome. Anytime It does make a difference. I have tried to tell people that if it hasn't been done in the last 100 hrs. or never then it needs it. Like you said, once you've done it once then it's very straight forward. -------- Roger Lee Tucson, Az. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=121767#121767 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: "Magic Bike"gets Damaged
Date: Jul 02, 2007
From: "Kirby Dennis Contr MDA/AL" <Dennis.Kirby(at)kirtland.af.mil>
Dear Kolb Friends - It is with a heavy heart that I share this story with you. But if what I pass on can save any of you from repeating my mistake, then it is worth the telling. Last week, I experienced an off-airport landing in my Mark-III. It was a beautiful Sunday morning, and I was flying with my 13-year-old son, Michael. We were about 30 miles from our home airport, when I suddenly heard a loud bang, followed by some significant vibration in the engine. I knew that something bigger than a bolt or muffler spring had gone thru the prop. We were over some salt flats in this part of central New Mexico, so I elected to do a precautionary landing on the dry lake bed below us. It turns out that the lake bed was far from dry. What looked like dry, solid ground was in fact merely a half-inch thick layer of dry surface crust. Underneath was very wet mud. As soon as we touched down, the wheels bogged in and we went over the nose, coming to rest upside down. Fortunately, nobody was hurt. We clambered out into knee-deep of the wettest, gooiest mud I've ever seen. We hiked out to safety, found a nearby ranch, and we were able to sleep in my own beds that night. But my Mark-III would remain upside-down in the mud until I could rescue her. I realized there was no way to go back out in the mud by foot to retrieve the plane. The ONLY way to get it out would be a helicopter. So, two days later, I hired a Bell Jet Ranger to extract my Kolb from the mud and deposit it on the shore where I could access it. Within an hour of the helicopter rescue, my Mark-III was back on its trailer and we headed home. I discovered that the oil cap had come off and gone thru the prop. Evidently, during my preflight when I checked my oil level, I had not secured the oil cap all the way to the detent that locks it in place. During the flight, it worked its way loose and came off. This was verified because the oil tank had no cap when I recovered the plane, and there was a fair-sized chunk missing from the leading edge of one of my prop blades. Could I have made it back to my home airport with the vibrating prop? Maybe, but I did not want to take that chance. I chose what looked like the best landing site available to me at the time, and that turned out to be a bad choice. Believe me, if I knew it was wet underneath the dry crust on that surface, I'd have landed elsewhere! The good news is (besides we are OK), damage to my plane is minimal. In fact, the majority of damage was due to the helicopter rescue, not the landing itself. I need to rebuild the rudder, the gap seal, and get a new prop. I'll also need to replace all the instruments, as they got soaked in the wet mud during those 48 hours upside down. Luckily, my 912 engine remained just above the mud surface and was not immersed. And so begin the repair efforts. I'll keep you all posted on my progress. And here is the lesson to take with you: Always double-check that EVERYTHING IS SECURE in your engine area when doing your preflight. You don't want stuff going through your propeller. Could ruin you day, as it did mine! Regards - Dennis Kirby Mark-III, 912ul, 85 hrs TT, in Cedar Crest, New Mexico ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Flight report
From: "R. Hankins" <rphanks(at)grantspass.com>
Date: Jul 02, 2007
I had a great weekend with my Firestar. I hooked up with some friends and we flew across the Cascade Mountains to the Oregon coast. I was accompanied by a quicksilver, a thundergull, a 1941 Aeronca Defender, a 912 powered Mark III and a titan tornado. We camped on the airport at Powers, Oregon, a small lumber town. Saturday night there was a great firewoks show over the log pond. The shells were breaking directly in front and above us. You could smell the smoke and see the guys lighting the fuses; we were that close. The log pond is up against the canyon wall and the echo of the shells exploding was spectacular. We did lots of low level flying along the Umpqua River and along the beach. Keith Anderson talked me into soloing his Mark III, a first for me. I took it up and did approach and departure stalls, steep turns, slow flight, and played with different flap settings in glide before attempting to land. I greased the landing and decided to quit while I was ahead. The flaps on the Mark III are quite effective. I'll attach some pictures and a link to a short video of flying the beach. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oGFNy4x2-V0 -------- Roger in Oregon 1992 KXP 503 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=121797#121797 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/p1060920_163.jpg http://forums.matronics.com//files/p1060910_874.jpg http://forums.matronics.com//files/p1060873_203.jpg http://forums.matronics.com//files/p1060901_209.jpg http://forums.matronics.com//files/p1060871_629.jpg ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Kolb Firefly
From: "John Williamson" <kolbrapilot1(at)tx.rr.com>
Date: Jul 02, 2007
Get it registered and inspected. You can spend the price of a DAR or have a pile of unregistered airplane. As for the January 31, 2008, check what was released by the FAA: ***** 06/28/07 - FAA SETS DEADLINES FOR E-LSA CONVERSION PROCESS Individuals converting aircraft into an experimental light-sport aircraft (E-LSA) have until January 31, 2008, to complete the E-LSA registration, the E-LSA airworthiness inspection, and the E-LSA certification process. The FAA will guarantee that your registration and certification packet will be reviewed and your E-LSA aircraft inspected in sufficient time to meet the January 2008 deadline if applicants meet the following three deadlines. By August 15, 2007, you submit your aircraft registration (N-number) request to the Aircraft Registration office, and; By October 1, 2007, you call your local E-LSA DAR to schedule your E-LSA airworthiness inspection, and; By November 30, 2007, you submit your aircraft airworthiness certification request packet to either an FAA FSDO, an FAA MIDO, or your local.E-LSA DAR Ask your local E-LSA DAR which office should receive this packet. If you fail to complete the above steps, the FAA cannot guarantee they'll be able to complete your E-LSA registration and certification inspection process prior to the January 31, 2008, deadline. ****** You might find someone away from the FAA system to buy it and fly it as an illegal ultralight, but by going thru the process you enlarge your potential buyer market. -------- John Williamson Arlington, TX Kolbra, 912ULS http://home.tx.rr.com/kolbrapilot Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=121799#121799 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Kolb Firefly
From: "Paul Petty" <paulpetty(at)myway.com>
Date: Jul 02, 2007
John, Why is there a deadline and what is the (if any) to regitering e-lsa over amature built experimental? -------- Paul Petty Kolbra #12 Ms Dixie 912 UL 70" warp Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=121805#121805 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 02, 2007
Subject: Re: Kolb Firefly
From: "Jim Dunn" <jim@tru-cast.com>
For me, the reason to go with a Firefly is because you want a part 103 ultralight. I think more folks would be interested in a 103 UL than a E-LSA. On the other hand, E-LSA allows you to log time in a "real airplane" to apply for more advanced ratings. Bottom line: I think it will have good/similar resale either way. Nobody knows for sure, but if you have a FF with 447 and 5-gal tank, I doubt the FAA will bother you. Worse case is you may have to remove brakes and instruments (or add a BRS) to make it FAR 103 legal. How hard would you think it would be to sell [Firefly] after January 31, with no airthworthiness certification or N-number? Would the Firefly be worth more with the airworthiness certification and N-numbered? Thanks. Jimmy ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Flight report
From: "jim" <jim@tru-cast.com>
Date: Jul 02, 2007
Wow, what a beautiful trip! Did you feel nervous flying over the Cascades in your Firestar? How was the Quicksilver able to keep up? Thanks for sharing your adventure. -------- Jim N. Idaho Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=121811#121811 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 02, 2007
Subject: "Magic Bike"gets Damaged
From: jam-n <jghunter(at)nol.net>
can u tell us about this? what was hrly rate? how did they do it, any pix? jg The ONLY way to get it out would be a helicopter. >So, two days later, I hired a Bell Jet Ranger to extract my Kolb from >the mud and deposit it on the shore where I could access it. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 02, 2007
From: "Richard Girard" <jindoguy(at)gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Kolb Firefly
Paul, if you don't mind me stepping in here. The advantages of E-LSA are: You use form 8050-88A "Affidavit of Ownership". It allows you to say, you don't have any receipts for the aircraft and can't get copies. You get it notarized and send it in and everybody is happy. This form expires Jan 31 2008. E-AB will require receipts for the kit, or the parts and pieces as stated on form 8050-88. No builders log is required for E-LSA like it is for E-AB. If requested, your E-LSA Operating Limitations can allow you to teach or use your aircraft for hire until Jan 31, 2010. Rental of and training in an E-AB is prohibited. Subsequent owners of an E-LSA can take a 16 hour course for a Repairman Inspector certificate and perform the annual conditional inspection on the E-LSA they own. Only the builder of an E-AB can get a repairman certificate for that aircraft and it is not transferable. The subsequent owners of an E-AB must have the conditional inspection done by an A & P (no IA required, though). Well, there's four reasons just off the top of my head without getting into the "going bandido" arguments. Rick On 7/2/07, Paul Petty wrote: > > > John, > > Why is there a deadline and what is the (if any) to regitering e-lsa over > amature built experimental? > > -------- > Paul Petty > Kolbra #12 > Ms Dixie > 912 UL 70" warp > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=121805#121805 > > -- Rick Girard "Ya'll drop on in" takes on a whole new meaning when you live at the airport. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Richard Pike" <richard(at)bcchapel.org>
Subject: Noise canceling earbuds
Date: Jul 02, 2007
Last week I decided to try something different to quiet the in-flight noise, and bought some noise canceling earbuds off ebay. The unit is a Philips HN060, and it has an active noise reduction circuit. It is designed for people on airliners, mowing lawns, riding your motorcycle, etc, and since I found some on ebay for $20 with free shipping, decided to give them a try. They arrived a little while ago, and initial impressions are excellent. Stuck the earbuds in, turned on the ANR circuit, and cranked up the riding lawn mower. They cut the noise level in half, so turned it off, and cranked up the Kawasaki 650 and stood behind the muffler. Cut the noise level about 60 percent. Went over to the airplane, put on the ancient Flightcom El Cheapos and tuned in the local ATIS. With the earbuds in place in the ear canal, and the headsets over the ears, the ATIS came through loud and clear. Went back and ran the motorcycle and the riding lawn mower again, and the Flightcoms over the earbuds helped further reduce the noise to a very quiet level. Planning to go flying tomorrow morning, and if things work as well then as they did a bit ago, ANR might be more inexpensive than any of us thought. There is a pot full of the Philips HN060 earphones on ebay, and most of them are under $30 with shipping. Plus, I can still use them riding the motorcycle, or mowing the airstrip. Such a deal... Will give an inflight review tomorrow around lunchtime, Lord willing. Richard Pike MKIII N420P (420ldPoops) ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 02, 2007
Subject: Re: Noise canceling earbuds
From: herbgh(at)juno.com
Richard Walmart sells three varieties of noise cancelling ear phones.. 30 to 50 bucks as I recall.. Best way to do it, imho, is to take the guts out and put them in a set of regular flight headphones.. Been thinking about that idea since I noticed them at Wally World.. My years of electronic experience tells me that the most expensive parts in the "higest retail" aviation head set is the molded plastic or the ear muffs...:-) Herb writes: Last week I decided to try something different to quiet the in-flight noise, and bought some noise canceling earbuds off ebay. The unit is a Philips HN060, and it has an active noise reduction circuit. It is designed for people on airliners, mowing lawns, riding your motorcycle, etc, and since I found some on ebay for $20 with free shipping, decided to give them a try. They arrived a little while ago, and initial impressions are excellent. Stuck the earbuds in, turned on the ANR circuit, and cranked up the riding lawn mower. They cut the noise level in half, so turned it off, and cranked up the Kawasaki 650 and stood behind the muffler. Cut the noise level about 60 percent. Went over to the airplane, put on the ancient Flightcom El Cheapos and tuned in the local ATIS. With the earbuds in place in the ear canal, and the headsets over the ears, the ATIS came through loud and clear. Went back and ran the motorcycle and the riding lawn mower again, and the Flightcoms over the earbuds helped further reduce the noise to a very quiet level. Planning to go flying tomorrow morning, and if things work as well then as they did a bit ago, ANR might be more inexpensive than any of us thought. There is a pot full of the Philips HN060 earphones on ebay, and most of them are under $30 with shipping. Plus, I can still use them riding the motorcycle, or mowing the airstrip. Such a deal... Will give an inflight review tomorrow around lunchtime, Lord willing. Richard Pike MKIII N420P (420ldPoops) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Richard Pike" <richard(at)bcchapel.org>
Subject: Re: Noise canceling earbuds
Date: Jul 02, 2007
I thought about that - but after I put the guts into the Flightcoms, how do I get the Flightcoms to fit under my motorcycle helmet? (Not to mention the extreme liklihood of my breaking the ANR stuff in the process?) (Easy for you - difficult for me) Let me try the KISS principle first - update tomorrow. Richard Pike MKIII N420P (420ldPoops) ----- Original Message ----- From: herbgh(at)juno.com To: kolb-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Monday, July 02, 2007 7:52 PM Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Noise canceling earbuds Richard Walmart sells three varieties of noise cancelling ear phones.. 30 to 50 bucks as I recall.. Best way to do it, imho, is to take the guts out and put them in a set of regular flight headphones.. Been thinking about that idea since I noticed them at Wally World.. My years of electronic experience tells me that the most expensive parts in the "higest retail" aviation head set is the molded plastic or the ear muffs...:-) Herb writes: Last week I decided to try something different to quiet the in-flight noise, and bought some noise canceling earbuds off ebay. The unit is a Philips HN060, and it has an active noise reduction circuit. It is designed for people on airliners, mowing lawns, riding your motorcycle, etc, and since I found some on ebay for $20 with free shipping, decided to give them a try. They arrived a little while ago, and initial impressions are excellent. Stuck the earbuds in, turned on the ANR circuit, and cranked up the riding lawn mower. They cut the noise level in half, so turned it off, and cranked up the Kawasaki 650 and stood behind the muffler. Cut the noise level about 60 percent. Went over to the airplane, put on the ancient Flightcom El Cheapos and tuned in the local ATIS. With the earbuds in place in the ear canal, and the headsets over the ears, the ATIS came through loud and clear. Went back and ran the motorcycle and the riding lawn mower again, and the Flightcoms over the earbuds helped further reduce the noise to a very quiet level. Planning to go flying tomorrow morning, and if things work as well then as they did a bit ago, ANR might be more inexpensive than any of us thought. There is a pot full of the Philips HN060 earphones on ebay, and most of them are under $30 with shipping. Plus, I can still use them riding the motorcycle, or mowing the airstrip. Such a deal... Will give an inflight review tomorrow around lunchtime, Lord willing. Richard Pike MKIII N420P (420ldPoops) http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List matronics.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Helmet choice - with David Clark headphone
From: "John H Murphy" <jhm9812(at)yahoo.com>
Date: Jul 02, 2007
I need to wear a helmet while flying out of a Ultralight park here in Boulder City, NV. Any recommendations as to a comfortable helmet that I can wear with my David Clark Headphones? Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=121889#121889 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 02, 2007
From: TheWanderingWench <thewanderingwench(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Flight report
Great story and great pics, Roger. thanks for sharing them. I hope you're going to fly the coast, with Powers as our camp, with us again this Labor Day weekend as you did last year - or will Dayna be too close to her delivery date? Larry Cottrell - you need to join us at the coast this year! Arty Trost Sandy, Oregon --- "R. Hankins" wrote: > > > I had a great weekend with my Firestar. I hooked up > with some friends and we flew across the Cascade > Mountains to the Oregon coast. I was accompanied by > a quicksilver, a thundergull, a 1941 Aeronca > Defender, a 912 powered Mark III and a titan > tornado. > We camped on the airport at Powers, Oregon, a small > lumber town. Saturday night there was a great > firewoks show over the log pond. The shells were > breaking directly in front and above us. You could > smell the smoke and see the guys lighting the fuses; > we were that close. The log pond is up against the > canyon wall and the echo of the shells exploding was > spectacular. > We did lots of low level flying along the Umpqua > River and along the beach. Keith Anderson talked me > into soloing his Mark III, a first for me. I took > it up and did approach and departure stalls, steep > turns, slow flight, and played with different flap > settings in glide before attempting to land. I > greased the landing and decided to quit while I was > ahead. The flaps on the Mark III are quite > effective. > > > I'll attach some pictures and a link to a short > video of flying the beach. > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oGFNy4x2-V0 > > -------- > Roger in Oregon > 1992 KXP 503 > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=121797#121797 > > > > > Attachments: > > http://forums.matronics.com//files/p1060920_163.jpg > http://forums.matronics.com//files/p1060910_874.jpg > http://forums.matronics.com//files/p1060873_203.jpg > http://forums.matronics.com//files/p1060901_209.jpg > http://forums.matronics.com//files/p1060871_629.jpg > > > > > > browse > Subscriptions page, > FAQ, > http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List > > Web Forums! > > > > > www.LessonsFromTheEdge.com "Life's a daring adventure or nothing" Helen Keller "I refuse to tip toe through life just to arrive safely at death." ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 02, 2007
From: TheWanderingWench <thewanderingwench(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: "Magic Bike"gets Damaged
Dennis - How did Michael and your wife handle your upside-down incident? I hope it didn't turn both of them off to flying! When you wrote that Michael was with you, my stomach cramped. It's one thing to have this happen when you're by yourself or with a friend - but with your son! Whew! I'm SOOOO glad that you're both o.k. And thanks for sharing this story - we all think we try to do good preflights, and yet realize that we can still overlook something. Do you use a checklist? I didn't use to - have changed that since my MV flight. It seems almost overkill, but I hope it keeps me from overlooking something - or becoming so familiar that I don't even see it. Arty --- Kirby Dennis Contr MDA/AL wrote: > MDA/AL" > > Dear Kolb Friends - > > It is with a heavy heart that I share this story > with you. snip www.LessonsFromTheEdge.com "Life's a daring adventure or nothing" Helen Keller "I refuse to tip toe through life just to arrive safely at death." ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 02, 2007
Subject: Re: Noise canceling earbuds
From: herbgh(at)juno.com
Richard Nuttin wrong with your method either...:-) Herb writes: I thought about that - but after I put the guts into the Flightcoms, how do I get the Flightcoms to fit under my motorcycle helmet? (Not to mention the extreme liklihood of my breaking the ANR stuff in the process?) (Easy for you - difficult for me) Let me try the KISS principle first - update tomorrow. Richard Pike MKIII N420P (420ldPoops) ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Flight report
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Date: Jul 02, 2007
Roger: You are having entirely too much fun flying. Pictures are great. Area is beautiful. Is there anywhere on the beach you could land and RON, or does the tide come all the way up to the rocks? -------- John Hauck MKIII/912ULS hauck's holler, alabama Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=121907#121907 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: "Magic Bike"gets Damaged
From: "John Hauck" <jhauck(at)elmore.rr.com>
Date: Jul 02, 2007
Dennis: Glad you all are ok. Airplanes are fixable. Still hurts though. What kind of prop were you flying? What kind of damage to the blades. Get her fixed. MV 2008 is right around the corner. -------- John Hauck MKIII/912ULS hauck's holler, alabama Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=121910#121910 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: "Magic Bike"gets Damaged
From: "Ralph B" <ul15rhb(at)juno.com>
Date: Jul 02, 2007
Dennis, I know it hurts now even though you are physically ok. I'm happy to hear that you and your son are ok. The plane can be repaired. Think positive. This can give you an opportunity to add some additional strength to the wings if you need it or something else. You can make it even better than before. When you are ready to fly again, this will be a distant memory. Ralph B -------- Ralph B Original Firestar 20 years flying it Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=121919#121919 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Kolb Firefly
From: "Ralph B" <ul15rhb(at)juno.com>
Date: Jul 02, 2007
The advantage of registration is that it's not limited to 5-gallons on board. I registered my Original Firestar with a 5-gallon tank, but I carry another 6 gallons to go places. The plane is 319 lbs empty. Now I can add more things if need be not worrying about staying within the structure of Part 103. Another concern is that some airports may start banning unregistered aircraft from entering for safety reasons (Sport Pilots are FAA trained and UL pilots may not be). Your Firefly will be worth more and you will get your $600 back should you sell. Ralph B -------- Ralph B Original Firestar 20 years flying it Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=121924#121924 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: DAquaNut(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 03, 2007
Subject: Re: "Magic Bike"gets Damaged
Dennis, So Sorry bout your Kolb! Glad to hear yall are ok. I used to think if I had a 4-stroke my worries would be over, but the last three incidences that I know of have involved 4- strokes. Just goes to show you cant be too safe or too redundant and for Arty, theres no such thing as overkill if it prevents a disaster! May you have a speedy rebuild! Ed Diebel FF 62


**************************************
See what's free at http://www.aol.com. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 02, 2007
Subject: Re: Kolb Firefly
From: "Jim Dunn" <jim@tru-cast.com>
Per FAA Order 8700.1 Dated 2/9/1996, Chapter 62: In short, if they received federal funds they are supposed to permit Ultralight activity, but they can deny UL if mixing cannot be done safely. Advisory Circular 150/5190-5 of June 10, 2002 is specifically on exclusions. I doubt LAX permits ULs, and rightfully so. 7. OPERATION OF ULTRALIGHT VEHICLES FROM AIRPORTS. A. Aeronautical Activity. Ultralight vehicle operators usually require the approval of airport authorities before conducting operations from an airport. Operation of ultralight vehicles is considered an aeronautical activity much the same as parachute jumping. B. Use of Airports. Federally funded airports must accommodate ultralight operations if this can be done safely. This does not mean that airport authorities must allow ultralights to operate from the runways; rather, the airport should set aside a special location for ultralight operations. It is acceptable for airport authorities to establish policies, including reasonable training requirements, that they believe are necessary to provide safe accommodations to ultralight vehicles. If an airports authorities believe it is unsafe to accommodate ultralights at the facility, they may request Flight Standards input in the assessment of the safety of proposed operations. (1) When assessing the safety of ultralight vehicle operations from airports, the inspector should bear in mind the operating characteristics of ultralight vehicles, the lack of pilot certification standards, and the fact that these vehicles must yield right-of-way to aircraft under all circumstances. If the safety of conventional aircraft operations would be compromised, the inspector should give a negative finding to the Airports Division. When possible, inspectors should assist in developing alternative methods to accommodate ultralight operations. (2) Nonfederally funded airports are not required to accommodate ultralight operations. The FAA has no authority in these situations; however, inspectors should encourage ultralight operators and airport management to consider alternative methods. ----------------------------------------- Ive always heard that if an airport recieves any form of assistance from the gov. in the form of money, they can not disallow any one , who is legal, the priviledge of landing there! Is that the case or not??? ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 02, 2007
Subject: Re: Kolb Firefly
From: "Jim Dunn" <jim@tru-cast.com>
You can carry extra fuel in an ultralight (e.g., in a portable gas can), you just can't have more than 5 gal tank available to the engine during flight. ------------------------------------------ The advantage of registration is that it's not limited to 5-gallons on board. I registered my Original Firestar with a 5-gallon tank, but I carry another 6 gallons to go places. The plane is 319 lbs empty. Now I can add more things if need be not worrying about staying within the structure of Part 103. Another concern is that some airports may start banning unregistered aircraft from entering for safety reasons (Sport Pilots are FAA trained and UL pilots may not be). Your Firefly will be worth more and you will get your $600 back should you sell. Ralph B -------- Ralph B Original Firestar 20 years flying it Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=121924#121924 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "pat ladd" <pj.ladd(at)btinternet.com>
Subject: Re: "Magic Bike"gets Damaged
Date: Jul 03, 2007
It is with a heavy heart>> Hard luck Dennis, thats is really sad news. Your only consolation is that you did all the right things ( except putting the oil cap on of course) and when the cap hit the fan your reactions were the best possible. The decision to land has to be the right one. You didn`t have enough information to risk trying anything else. You flew the plane, sorted out a landing spot and , until you actually touched down, carried out an entirely safe routine. The fact that the surface was not as it appeared was not something you could do anything about. The biggest plus is of course that no-one was hurt. Not event the Magic Bicycle sustained serious damage, and recovering the plane by helicopter...Well.. thats style. Reel Cool, man Cheers Pat ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 03, 2007
From: "Jack B. Hart" <jbhart(at)onlyinternet.net>
Subject: Re: Helmet choice - with David Clark headphone
> >I need to wear a helmet while flying out of a Ultralight park here in Boulder City, NV. Any recommendations as to a comfortable helmet that I can wear with my David Clark Headphones? > John, Are we talking about a hard or soft helmet? Jacl B. Hart FF004 Winchester, IN ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Helmet choice - with David Clark headphone
From: "John H Murphy" <jhm9812(at)yahoo.com>
Date: Jul 03, 2007
Hard. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=121959#121959 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: N27SB(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 03, 2007
Subject: Re: Kolb Firefly
In a message dated 7/3/2007 2:49:08 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, jim@tru-cast.com writes: --> Kolb-List message posted by: "Jim Dunn" <jim@tru-cast.com> You can carry extra fuel in an ultralight (e.g., in a portable gas can), you just can't have more than 5 gal tank available to the engine during flight Jim, Can you quote the Reg that states this? I would like to carry extra fuel on some of my flights but did not think that it was Part 103. steve ************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Kolb Firefly
From: "Ralph B" <ul15rhb(at)juno.com>
Date: Jul 03, 2007
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- You can carry extra fuel in an ultralight (e.g., in a portable gas can), you just can't have more than 5 gal tank available to the engine during flight. ------------------------------------------ Jim, Part 103 limits it to 5 gallons. The rules are not clear enough to say more than 5 gallons on board. I think they say "a 5-gallon capacity". With Sport Pilot and ultralight registration, the FAA will say there are no more excuses for overweight ultralights. The only true ultralights that make weight are single PPC's with 5-gallons/503 or smaller engine, and single fixed-wings with a 447 or smaller and 5-gallons. My Firestar fits this last category, but is overweight. Sport Pilot registration puts a whole new twist on entering airports for ultralights. They can ban them for safety reasons even if they get federal funding. Even if an ultralight makes weight and is legal, they have not been inspected


June 03, 2007 - July 03, 2007

Kolb-Archive.digest.vol-gt