RV10-Archive.digest.vol-ik

September 14, 2011 - October 17, 2011



      > ="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List
      > ://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com
      > min.
      > 
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > *
      >
      >
      > *
      
      
________________________________________________________________________________
From: Tim Olson <Tim(at)MyRV10.com>
Subject: Re: YIO-540 airflow performance injectors
Date: Sep 14, 2011
I don't think that's being completely straight forward. They may be a good s mall company and great folks, but there is nothing about the system that mak es it better at running LOP than the other...you can use the same injector i nserts to tune either system and running LOP is routinely done by many with p recision systems too. The product should be evaluated on its true merits or differences....not made up ones. Tim On Sep 14, 2011, at 11:14 PM, John Cox wrote: > And the "Performance" give substantially more control at adjusting LOP ope rations. There are several other benefits not stated. PLUS Don and his wif e are small business owners striving hard to make it right. The Precision g uys are big business and many Certified Assessories. > > John - 40600 > > On Sep 14, 2011 6:23 PM, "Bob Turner" wrote: > > > > Mystery solved. After a very nice email from Don at AirFlow Performance, it seems I got my "P's" mixed up. I have a Precision, not Performance, fuel injection system. And they use different nomenclature: The "one banded" res trictors from Precision are .028" (while one band from Performance means .02 2"). > > > > -------- > > Bob Turner > > RV-10 QB > > > > > > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=352334#352334 > ="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List">http://www.matronics.com /Navigator?RV10-List > ://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com > min. > > > > > > > > > ========================== ========= ========================== ========= ========================== ========= ========================== ========= > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Should I pop on this IO540?
From: "EdKranz" <ed.kranz(at)gmail.com>
Date: Sep 15, 2011
I'm not planning on ordering my tail kit until after the holiday season is over, and I didn't think I'd need to worry about a motor for a few more years... but... I just got an email from a A&P friend of mine who knows I'm going to be building. He says that he found an IO540 D4A5 for me. It's currently on another plane that they are going to be downsizing to a 200HP motor. It has 890 hours on it, "Not damaged, no prop strikes" and he's going to sell it with all the accessories. It has Bendix mags. I had always figured I'd go the new route with either a Barrett or Aerosports engine, but if the price is right, and I can be CONFIDENT in the motor, I might consider this route. I don't have a firm price that he is asking yet, but he said "about 1/3 the new cost" that he looked up on the Vans website... so I'm guessing around $15,000. What are your opinions on this? What is the cost of a rebuild on a D4A5? Would I be able save any money and still have a reliable motor? Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=352368#352368 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 15, 2011
Subject: Re: Should I pop on this IO540?
From: William Greenley <wgreenley(at)gmail.com>
I am looking for something like, my thought is that I will do the test flying and other initial work with the used engine and at some point have it overhauled. But an engine like this could well be good for 1000 hours. If it is currently flying on the other plane you can have a careful checkout done which should give some confidence on what you are getting, but obviously you can never be sure. On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 11:14 AM, EdKranz wrote: > > I'm not planning on ordering my tail kit until after the holiday season is over, and I didn't think I'd need to worry about a motor for a few more years... but... > > I just got an email from a A&P friend of mine who knows I'm going to be building. He says that he found an IO540 D4A5 for me. It's currently on another plane that they are going to be downsizing to a 200HP motor. > > It has 890 hours on it, "Not damaged, no prop strikes" and he's going to sell it with all the accessories. It has Bendix mags. > > I had always figured I'd go the new route with either a Barrett or Aerosports engine, but if the price is right, and I can be CONFIDENT in the motor, I might consider this route. > > I don't have a firm price that he is asking yet, but he said "about 1/3 the new cost" that he looked up on the Vans website... so I'm guessing around $15,000. > > What are your opinions on this? What is the cost of a rebuild on a D4A5? Would I be able save any money and still have a reliable motor? > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=352368#352368 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Seano" <sean(at)braunandco.com>
Subject: Re: Should I pop on this IO540?
Date: Sep 15, 2011
One advantage is a known good running engine during phase I and breakin. Since it is brokin in, you won't have to worry about running on the ground too much or glazing the cylinders before first flight. Also, isn't most of the engine failures during the first few hours on an engine? If the price is good and you trust it is a good running engine, I say go for it. my 2 ----- Original Message ----- From: "EdKranz" <ed.kranz(at)gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2011 9:14 AM Subject: RV10-List: Should I pop on this IO540? > > I'm not planning on ordering my tail kit until after the holiday season is > over, and I didn't think I'd need to worry about a motor for a few more > years... but... > > I just got an email from a A&P friend of mine who knows I'm going to be > building. He says that he found an IO540 D4A5 for me. It's currently on > another plane that they are going to be downsizing to a 200HP motor. > > It has 890 hours on it, "Not damaged, no prop strikes" and he's going to > sell it with all the accessories. It has Bendix mags. > > I had always figured I'd go the new route with either a Barrett or > Aerosports engine, but if the price is right, and I can be CONFIDENT in > the motor, I might consider this route. > > I don't have a firm price that he is asking yet, but he said "about 1/3 > the new cost" that he looked up on the Vans website... so I'm guessing > around $15,000. > > What are your opinions on this? What is the cost of a rebuild on a D4A5? > Would I be able save any money and still have a reliable motor? > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=352368#352368 > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Should I pop on this IO540?
From: Rick <ricksked(at)cox.net>
Date: Sep 15, 2011
It's on VAF for 17.9k Rick Sent from my iPhone On Sep 15, 2011, at 8:14 AM, "EdKranz" wrote: > > I'm not planning on ordering my tail kit until after the holiday season is over, and I didn't think I'd need to worry about a motor for a few more years... but... > > I just got an email from a A&P friend of mine who knows I'm going to be building. He says that he found an IO540 D4A5 for me. It's currently on another plane that they are going to be downsizing to a 200HP motor. > > It has 890 hours on it, "Not damaged, no prop strikes" and he's going to sell it with all the accessories. It has Bendix mags. > > I had always figured I'd go the new route with either a Barrett or Aerosports engine, but if the price is right, and I can be CONFIDENT in the motor, I might consider this route. > > I don't have a firm price that he is asking yet, but he said "about 1/3 the new cost" that he looked up on the Vans website... so I'm guessing around $15,000. > > What are your opinions on this? What is the cost of a rebuild on a D4A5? Would I be able save any money and still have a reliable motor? > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=352368#352368 > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 15, 2011
Subject: Re: Should I pop on this IO540?
From: Ed Kranz <ed.kranz(at)gmail.com>
Thanks for the heads up. He didn't tell me he was going to do that. On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 10:47 AM, Rick wrote: > > It's on VAF for 17.9k > > Rick > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Sep 15, 2011, at 8:14 AM, "EdKranz" wrote: > > > > > I'm not planning on ordering my tail kit until after the holiday season > is over, and I didn't think I'd need to worry about a motor for a few more > years... but... > > > > I just got an email from a A&P friend of mine who knows I'm going to be > building. He says that he found an IO540 D4A5 for me. It's currently on > another plane that they are going to be downsizing to a 200HP motor. > > > > It has 890 hours on it, "Not damaged, no prop strikes" and he's going to > sell it with all the accessories. It has Bendix mags. > > > > I had always figured I'd go the new route with either a Barrett or > Aerosports engine, but if the price is right, and I can be CONFIDENT in the > motor, I might consider this route. > > > > I don't have a firm price that he is asking yet, but he said "about 1/3 > the new cost" that he looked up on the Vans website... so I'm guessing > around $15,000. > > > > What are your opinions on this? What is the cost of a rebuild on a D4A5? > Would I be able save any money and still have a reliable motor? > > > > > > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=352368#352368 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Should I pop on this IO540?
From: Sohrab Kermanj <flysrv10(at)gmail.com>
Date: Sep 15, 2011
I bought a zero time engine with new cam and first run crank, new mags and overhauled accessories (fuel pump, servo) completely new top end from Americas Aircraft engine for less that twice that. No core was required. My vote is to talk to AAE. Rob Kermanj Sent from my iPhone On Sep 15, 2011, at 11:47 AM, Rick wrote: > > It's on VAF for 17.9k > > Rick > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Sep 15, 2011, at 8:14 AM, "EdKranz" wrote: > >> >> I'm not planning on ordering my tail kit until after the holiday season is over, and I didn't think I'd need to worry about a motor for a few more years... but... >> >> I just got an email from a A&P friend of mine who knows I'm going to be building. He says that he found an IO540 D4A5 for me. It's currently on another plane that they are going to be downsizing to a 200HP motor. >> >> It has 890 hours on it, "Not damaged, no prop strikes" and he's going to sell it with all the accessories. It has Bendix mags. >> >> I had always figured I'd go the new route with either a Barrett or Aerosports engine, but if the price is right, and I can be CONFIDENT in the motor, I might consider this route. >> >> I don't have a firm price that he is asking yet, but he said "about 1/3 the new cost" that he looked up on the Vans website... so I'm guessing around $15,000. >> >> What are your opinions on this? What is the cost of a rebuild on a D4A5? Would I be able save any money and still have a reliable motor? >> >> >> >> >> Read this topic online here: >> >> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=352368#352368 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Should I pop on this IO540?
Date: Sep 15, 2011
From: "Rhonda Bewley" <Rhonda(at)bpaengines.com>
Ed: Make sure you know what the engine configuration is and what the rebuild history on it has been (specifically the size of the main and rod journals on the crankshaft) I would definitely want to know what the compression ratio was if I were you. Example, if it is a 10:1 compression engine, you're likely going to be looking at an overhaul around 1,000 hours. I would also strongly suggest that you verify the engine and crankshaft number separately to make sure that the crankshaft is not affected by any of the Lycoming crankshaft ADs. Even though you are in an experimental application, you don't want to have to buy a new crankshaft if that one is on any lists. Just my opinion as I'd love the opportunity to sell you a new one, but if you can get a good deal, then who could blame you. Regards, Rhonda Barrett Barrett Precision Engines, Inc. ________________________________ From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Ed Kranz Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2011 11:06 AM Subject: Re: RV10-List: Should I pop on this IO540? Thanks for the heads up. He didn't tell me he was going to do that. On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 10:47 AM, Rick wrote: It's on VAF for 17.9k Rick Sent from my iPhone On Sep 15, 2011, at 8:14 AM, "EdKranz" wrote: > > I'm not planning on ordering my tail kit until after the holiday season is over, and I didn't think I'd need to worry about a motor for a few more years... but... > > I just got an email from a A&P friend of mine who knows I'm going to be building. He says that he found an IO540 D4A5 for me. It's currently on another plane that they are going to be downsizing to a 200HP motor. > > It has 890 hours on it, "Not damaged, no prop strikes" and he's going to sell it with all the accessories. It has Bendix mags. > > I had always figured I'd go the new route with either a Barrett or Aerosports engine, but if the price is right, and I can be CONFIDENT in the motor, I might consider this route. > > I don't have a firm price that he is asking yet, but he said "about 1/3 the new cost" that he looked up on the Vans website... so I'm guessing around $15,000. > > What are your opinions on this? What is the cost of a rebuild on a D4A5? Would I be able save any money and still have a reliable motor? > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=352368#352368 > > arget="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List http://forums.matronics.com le, List Admin. ="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Should I pop on this IO540?
From: Rick <ricksked(at)cox.net>
Date: Sep 15, 2011
And figure that rebuild through a good shop like BPE could run you upwards o f 24k. Trust me I've researched it. That's why engine number 2 will come fro m my good friends at BPE. Allen is not only smart he's cute too.... Or is t hat Rhonda? ;) Rick Sent from my iPhone On Sep 15, 2011, at 9:26 AM, "Rhonda Bewley" wrote: > Ed: > > Make sure you know what the engine configuration is and what the rebuild h istory on it has been (specifically the size of the main and rod journals on the crankshaft) I would definitely want to know what the compression ratio w as if I were you. Example, if it is a 10:1 compression engine, you=99 re likely going to be looking at an overhaul around 1,000 hours. I would al so strongly suggest that you verify the engine and crankshaft number separat ely to make sure that the crankshaft is not affected by any of the Lycoming c rankshaft ADs. Even though you are in an experimental application, you don =99t want to have to buy a new crankshaft if that one is on any lists. > > Just my opinion as I=99d love the opportunity to sell you a new one, but if you can get a good deal, then who could blame you. > > Regards, > > Rhonda Barrett > Barrett Precision Engines, Inc. > > From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@ matronics.com] On Behalf Of Ed Kranz > Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2011 11:06 AM > To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: Re: RV10-List: Should I pop on this IO540? > > Thanks for the heads up. He didn't tell me he was going to do that. > > On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 10:47 AM, Rick wrote: > > It's on VAF for 17.9k > > Rick > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Sep 15, 2011, at 8:14 AM, "EdKranz" wrote: > > > > > I'm not planning on ordering my tail kit until after the holiday season i s over, and I didn't think I'd need to worry about a motor for a few more ye ars... but... > > > > I just got an email from a A&P friend of mine who knows I'm going to be b uilding. He says that he found an IO540 D4A5 for me. It's currently on anoth er plane that they are going to be downsizing to a 200HP motor. > > > > It has 890 hours on it, "Not damaged, no prop strikes" and he's going to sell it with all the accessories. It has Bendix mags. > > > > I had always figured I'd go the new route with either a Barrett or Aeros ports engine, but if the price is right, and I can be CONFIDENT in the motor , I might consider this route. > > > > I don't have a firm price that he is asking yet, but he said "about 1/3 t he new cost" that he looked up on the Vans website... so I'm guessing around $15,000. > > > > What are your opinions on this? What is the cost of a rebuild on a D4A5? Would I be able save any money and still have a reliable motor? > > > > > > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=352368#352368 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ========== > arget="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List > ========== > http://forums.matronics.com > ========== > le, List Admin. > ="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution > ========== > > > > > > > http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List > http://forums.matronics.com > http://www.matronics.com/contribution > > > ========================== ========= ========================== ========= ========================== ========= ========================== ========= > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Pascal" <rv10flyer(at)verizon.net>
Subject: Re: Should I pop on this IO540?
Date: Sep 15, 2011
Same here. I felt that new was overkill, specially since I wanted the old Narrow deck core. America's was first rate. Interestingly they had an engine with the same hours off a plane that was being parted out. America's would not sell the engine to me unless they first verified all was fine inside. All was close to new, but if it wasn't, than we would know for sure. When it comes to engines unless you open it up and see what's inside, you're guessing it's fine.. that was not a risk I was willing to take. I suppose documents and scopes would work..but I am "trusting" it's accurate. If you're A&P is reliable and can scope and do everything for you to assure it's solid, you may be fine. People have left engines sitting for years, but they were building already, you are planning to put off a 10k investment in a tail kit but are willing to spend 15K on a engine you wont need for a while? I would start the project first and order the engine later in the build. Things happen, people "need" to stop building, some even need to sell off their projects. Engines will come up, the prices may as well but you will have options. Best of success! Pascal -----Original Message----- From: Sohrab Kermanj Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2011 9:15 AM Subject: Re: RV10-List: Should I pop on this IO540? I bought a zero time engine with new cam and first run crank, new mags and overhauled accessories (fuel pump, servo) completely new top end from Americas Aircraft engine for less that twice that. No core was required. My vote is to talk to AAE. Rob Kermanj Sent from my iPhone On Sep 15, 2011, at 11:47 AM, Rick wrote: > > It's on VAF for 17.9k > > Rick > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Sep 15, 2011, at 8:14 AM, "EdKranz" wrote: > >> >> I'm not planning on ordering my tail kit until after the holiday season >> is over, and I didn't think I'd need to worry about a motor for a few >> more years... but... >> >> I just got an email from a A&P friend of mine who knows I'm going to be >> building. He says that he found an IO540 D4A5 for me. It's currently on >> another plane that they are going to be downsizing to a 200HP motor. >> >> It has 890 hours on it, "Not damaged, no prop strikes" and he's going to >> sell it with all the accessories. It has Bendix mags. >> >> I had always figured I'd go the new route with either a Barrett or >> Aerosports engine, but if the price is right, and I can be CONFIDENT in >> the motor, I might consider this route. >> >> I don't have a firm price that he is asking yet, but he said "about 1/3 >> the new cost" that he looked up on the Vans website... so I'm guessing >> around $15,000. >> >> What are your opinions on this? What is the cost of a rebuild on a D4A5? >> Would I be able save any money and still have a reliable motor? >> >> >> >> >> Read this topic online here: >> >> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=352368#352368 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 15, 2011
From: Linn Walters <pitts_pilot(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: Dash board edge trim
You might try the automotive door edge trim ..... comes in colors too. Linn On 9/14/2011 9:42 PM, Chris wrote: > > I am finalizing the plane for weight and balance and making sure I > have done everything I want to do. I am wondering what folks have done > to soften the edge of the dash (the aft edge of the F-1071 FWD fuse > top skin). I do not want to do anything too fancy but simple and quick > but nice looking. I noticed the Van's RV-10 has automotive type fuel > line split down the middle and slipped over the edge, which is ok, I > guess, but I would like a slight step above that solution. > > Thanks > > Chris Lucas > > #40072 > > N919AR > > * > > > * ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Should I pop on this IO540?
From: "rv10flyer" <wayne.gillispie(at)yahoo.com>
Date: Sep 15, 2011
Downsizing...be careful as I have never heard of any pilot wanting less power. I would not buy it unless I saw some performance numbers for myself, researched, boroscoped and compression tested it. Also if older than 10 yrs you may have some age related issues to deal with. If it is already removed then I would be a little suspicious. I know if I was going to sell my "Huge IO-540" running engine, it would be planned far enough in advance to allow potential buyers to fly with me or video it for them. -------- Wayne Gillispie, A&P 5/93, PPC 10/08 Bldr# 40983SB Baffles then fuel/oil/exhaust. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=352394#352394 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: YIO-540 airflow performance injectors
From: "Bob Turner" <bobturner(at)alum.rpi.edu>
Date: Sep 15, 2011
Is that correct? e.g., can the airflow performance restrictors fit in the Precision nozzles? According to the Precision web site, they won't sell restrictors only - they want you to buy restrictors and nozzles as a matched set. -------- Bob Turner RV-10 QB Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=352398#352398 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 15, 2011
Subject: Re: Should I pop on this IO540?
From: Ed Kranz <ed.kranz(at)gmail.com>
It's currently on a Starduster. He wants to put on a shorter lighter 4 cylinder engine, and make a few bucks in the process. On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 1:02 PM, rv10flyer wrote: > > Downsizing...be careful as I have never heard of any pilot wanting less > power. > > I would not buy it unless I saw some performance numbers for myself, > researched, boroscoped and compression tested it. Also if older than 10 yrs > you may have some age related issues to deal with. > > If it is already removed then I would be a little suspicious. I know if I > was going to sell my "Huge IO-540" running engine, it would be planned far > enough in advance to allow potential buyers to fly with me or video it for > them. > > -------- > Wayne Gillispie, A&P 5/93, PPC 10/08 > Bldr# 40983SB Baffles then fuel/oil/exhaust. > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=352394#352394 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: David <dmaib(at)mac.com>
Subject: Re: YIO-540 airflow performance injectors
Date: Sep 15, 2011
Airflow restrictors fit fine in Precision system. I took my airplane (with Precision FI) to Airflow a couple of years ago and spent the afternoon with Kyle balancing my injectors. David Maib 40559 Flying On Sep 15, 2011, at 2:46 PM, Bob Turner wrote: > > Is that correct? e.g., can the airflow performance restrictors fit > in the Precision nozzles? > According to the Precision web site, they won't sell restrictors > only - they want you to buy restrictors and nozzles as a matched set. > > -------- > Bob Turner > RV-10 QB > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=352398#352398 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: YIO-540 airflow performance injectors
From: Tim Olson <Tim(at)MyRV10.com>
Date: Sep 15, 2011
I bought my restrictors from them. They are a great way to go. If they require a matched set that would be something new. I don't see why it would matter. Tim On Sep 15, 2011, at 1:46 PM, "Bob Turner" wrote: > > Is that correct? e.g., can the airflow performance restrictors fit in the Precision nozzles? > According to the Precision web site, they won't sell restrictors only - they want you to buy restrictors and nozzles as a matched set. > > -------- > Bob Turner > RV-10 QB > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=352398#352398 > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 15, 2011
From: Rick Lark <larkrv10(at)yahoo.ca>
Subject: Re: Dash board edge trim
Years ago we replaced our glareshield cover when we replaced the windshield in our Cardinal, with a piece of leather we bought.=C2- After having a f riend cut and sew it to the proper shape,=C2-we then glued it down.=C2- All in all a bad idea, as the leather shrunk, and we ended up ripping it a ll out for a commercially made cover anyway. =C2- Rick #40956 Southampton, Ont =C2- --- On Thu, 9/15/11, Rick wrote: From: Rick <ricksked(at)cox.net> Subject: Re: RV10-List: Dash board edge trim Received: Thursday, September 15, 2011, 3:07 AM Get with Abby from flightline interiors. She has a great glareshield cover and edge.=C2- Rick RV-10 x 2 RV Central Las Vegas=C2- Sent from my iPhone On Sep 14, 2011, at 7:18 PM, "Rene" wrote: This is what I used.can=99t remember how long. =C2- http://www.cleavelandtoolstore.com/prodinfo.asp?number=GSF12 =C2- Rene' 801-721-6080 =C2- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@m atronics.com] On Behalf Of Chris Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2011 7:42 PM Subject: RV10-List: Dash board edge trim =C2- I am finalizing the plane for weight and balance and making sure I have don e everything I want to do. I am wondering what folks have done to soften th e edge of the dash (the aft edge of the F-1071 FWD fuse top skin). I do not want to do anything too fancy but simple and quick but nice looking. I not iced the Van's RV-10 has automotive type fuel line split down the middle an d slipped over the edge, which is ok, I guess, but I would like a slight st ep above that solution. Thanks Chris Lucas #40072 N919AR =C2- =C2-http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-Listhttp://foru ms.matronics.comhttp://www.matronics.com/contribution =C2- ========= ref="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List">http://www.matronics.c om/Navigator?RV10-List ========= ums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com ========= http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/contributio n ========= ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 15, 2011
From: Kelly McMullen <kellym(at)aviating.com>
Subject: Re: Should I pop on this IO540?
Another option for someone buying said engine is to have it delivered to one of the "name" engine shops to put on their test cell, run it to verify its condition and performance, then pickle it to be ready for install. That gets you a tested engine that you know is or isn't as represented that won't need a break-in. Of course age of the overhaul as well as hours of use are factors, as well as whether it is properly configured with right mounts, and proper accessory location. On 9/15/2011 10:12 AM, Pascal wrote: > > Same here. I felt that new was overkill, specially since I wanted the > old Narrow deck core. America's was first rate. > Interestingly they had an engine with the same hours off a plane that > was being parted out. America's would not sell the engine to me unless > they first verified all was fine inside. All was close to new, but if > it wasn't, than we would know for sure. When it comes to engines > unless you open it up and see what's inside, you're guessing it's > fine.. that was not a risk I was willing to take. I suppose documents > and scopes would work..but I am "trusting" it's accurate. > If you're A&P is reliable and can scope and do everything for you to > assure it's solid, you may be fine. > People have left engines sitting for years, but they were building > already, you are planning to put off a 10k investment in a tail kit > but are willing to spend 15K on a engine you wont need for a while? > I would start the project first and order the engine later in the > build. Things happen, people "need" to stop building, some even need > to sell off their projects. Engines will come up, the prices may as > well but you will have options. > Best of success! > Pascal > > -----Original Message----- From: Sohrab Kermanj > Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2011 9:15 AM > To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: Re: RV10-List: Should I pop on this IO540? > > > I bought a zero time engine with new cam and first run crank, new mags > and overhauled accessories (fuel pump, servo) completely new top end > from Americas Aircraft engine for less that twice that. No core was > required. My vote is to talk to AAE. > > Rob Kermanj > Sent from my iPhone > > On Sep 15, 2011, at 11:47 AM, Rick wrote: > >> >> It's on VAF for 17.9k >> >> Rick >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On Sep 15, 2011, at 8:14 AM, "EdKranz" wrote: >> >>> >>> I'm not planning on ordering my tail kit until after the holiday >>> season is over, and I didn't think I'd need to worry about a motor >>> for a few more years... but... >>> >>> I just got an email from a A&P friend of mine who knows I'm going to >>> be building. He says that he found an IO540 D4A5 for me. It's >>> currently on another plane that they are going to be downsizing to a >>> 200HP motor. >>> >>> It has 890 hours on it, "Not damaged, no prop strikes" and he's >>> going to sell it with all the accessories. It has Bendix mags. >>> >>> I had always figured I'd go the new route with either a Barrett or >>> Aerosports engine, but if the price is right, and I can be CONFIDENT >>> in the motor, I might consider this route. >>> >>> I don't have a firm price that he is asking yet, but he said "about >>> 1/3 the new cost" that he looked up on the Vans website... so I'm >>> guessing around $15,000. >>> >>> What are your opinions on this? What is the cost of a rebuild on a >>> D4A5? Would I be able save any money and still have a reliable motor? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Read this topic online here: >>> >>> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=352368#352368 >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Robin Marks <robin(at)PaintTheWeb.com>
Date: Sep 15, 2011
Subject: Re: Should I pop on this IO540?
Snip >> I would start the project first and order the engine later in the build. Things happen, people "need" to stop building, some even need to sell off their projects. Engines will come up, the prices may as well but you will have options. I don't necessarily think that is an excellent price and as such with all the potential unknowns would have me following Pascal's suggestion and wait. A friend purchased a similar "sounding" engine for $10k. He is now flying and the engine was a good deal to get flying but it is making metal and it can not come close to the power generated by my BPE engine. He comments every time we take off in my -10. See how quickly this engine showed up? The same thing will happen closer to the time you will actually need an engine. I say wait. Robin Sent from my iPad2. On Sep 15, 2011, at 12:23 PM, "Pascal" wrote: Same here. I felt that new was overkill, specially since I wanted the old Narrow deck core. America's was first rate. Interestingly they had an engine with the same hours off a plane that was being parted out. America's would not sell the engine to me unless they first verified all was fine inside. All was close to new, but if it wasn't, than we would know for sure. When it comes to engines unless you open it up and see what's inside, you're guessing it's fine.. that was not a risk I was willing to take. I suppose documents and scopes would work..but I am "trusting" it's accurate. If you're A&P is reliable and can scope and do everything for you to assure it's solid, you may be fine. People have left engines sitting for years, but they were building already, you are planning to put off a 10k investment in a tail kit but are willing to spend 15K on a engine you wont need for a while? I would start the project first and order the engine later in the build. Things happen, people "need" to stop building, some even need to sell off their projects. Engines will come up, the prices may as well but you will have options. Best of success! Pascal -----Original Message----- From: Sohrab Kermanj Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2011 9:15 AM Subject: Re: RV10-List: Should I pop on this IO540? I bought a zero time engine with new cam and first run crank, new mags and overhauled accessories (fuel pump, servo) completely new top end from Americas Aircraft engine for less that twice that. No core was required. My vote is to talk to AAE. Rob Kermanj Sent from my iPhone On Sep 15, 2011, at 11:47 AM, Rick wrote: It's on VAF for 17.9k Rick Sent from my iPhone On Sep 15, 2011, at 8:14 AM, "EdKranz" wrote: I'm not planning on ordering my tail kit until after the holiday season is over, and I didn't think I'd need to worry about a motor for a few more years... but... I just got an email from a A&P friend of mine who knows I'm going to be building. He says that he found an IO540 D4A5 for me. It's currently on another plane that they are going to be downsizing to a 200HP motor. It has 890 hours on it, "Not damaged, no prop strikes" and he's going to sell it with all the accessories. It has Bendix mags. I had always figured I'd go the new route with either a Barrett or Aerosports engine, but if the price is right, and I can be CONFIDENT in the motor, I might consider this route. I don't have a firm price that he is asking yet, but he said "about 1/3 the new cost" that he looked up on the Vans website... so I'm guessing around $15,000. What are your opinions on this? What is the cost of a rebuild on a D4A5? Would I be able save any money and still have a reliable motor? Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=352368#352368 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 15, 2011
Subject: Re: Should I pop on this IO540?
From: Ed Kranz <ed.kranz(at)gmail.com>
Thanks for all the input guys! If I proceed, I'm going to have a friend of mine who's an A&P IA go thru it top to bottom. And thanks to all the info, I know a few more things I'm going to be looking for in the logs, and ask to have looked at. I also feel better that a few of you say to wait. I don't want to go into any transaction feeling like it's the last chance for a deal. On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 5:20 PM, Robin Marks wrote: > Snip >> I would start the project first and order the engine later in the > build. Things happen, people "need" to stop building, some even need to sell > off their projects. Engines will come up, the prices may as well but you > will have options. > > I don't necessarily think that is an excellent price and as such with all > the potential unknowns would have me following Pascal's suggestion and wait. > A friend purchased a similar "sounding" engine for $10k. He is now flying > and the engine was a good deal to get flying but it is making metal and it > can not come close to the power generated by my BPE engine. He comments > every time we take off in my -10. > See how quickly this engine showed up? The same thing will happen closer to > the time you will actually need an engine. I say wait. > > Robin > > Sent from my iPad2. > > On Sep 15, 2011, at 12:23 PM, "Pascal" wrote: > > > Same here. I felt that new was overkill, specially since I wanted the old > Narrow deck core. America's was first rate. > Interestingly they had an engine with the same hours off a plane that was > being parted out. America's would not sell the engine to me unless they > first verified all was fine inside. All was close to new, but if it wasn't, > than we would know for sure. When it comes to engines unless you open it up > and see what's inside, you're guessing it's fine.. that was not a risk I was > willing to take. I suppose documents and scopes would work..but I am > "trusting" it's accurate. > If you're A&P is reliable and can scope and do everything for you to assure > it's solid, you may be fine. > People have left engines sitting for years, but they were building already, > you are planning to put off a 10k investment in a tail kit but are willing > to spend 15K on a engine you wont need for a while? > I would start the project first and order the engine later in the build. > Things happen, people "need" to stop building, some even need to sell off > their projects. Engines will come up, the prices may as well but you will > have options. > Best of success! > Pascal > > -----Original Message----- From: Sohrab Kermanj > Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2011 9:15 AM > To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: Re: RV10-List: Should I pop on this IO540? > > > I bought a zero time engine with new cam and first run crank, new mags and > overhauled accessories (fuel pump, servo) completely new top end from > Americas Aircraft engine for less that twice that. No core was required. My > vote is to talk to AAE. > > Rob Kermanj > Sent from my iPhone > > On Sep 15, 2011, at 11:47 AM, Rick wrote: > > > It's on VAF for 17.9k > > > Rick > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On Sep 15, 2011, at 8:14 AM, "EdKranz" wrote: > > > I'm not planning on ordering my tail kit until after the holiday season is > over, and I didn't think I'd need to worry about a motor for a few more > years... but... > > > I just got an email from a A&P friend of mine who knows I'm going to be > building. He says that he found an IO540 D4A5 for me. It's currently on > another plane that they are going to be downsizing to a 200HP motor. > > > It has 890 hours on it, "Not damaged, no prop strikes" and he's going to > sell it with all the accessories. It has Bendix mags. > > > I had always figured I'd go the new route with either a Barrett or > Aerosports engine, but if the price is right, and I can be CONFIDENT in the > motor, I might consider this route. > > > I don't have a firm price that he is asking yet, but he said "about 1/3 the > new cost" that he looked up on the Vans website... so I'm guessing around > $15,000. > > > What are your opinions on this? What is the cost of a rebuild on a D4A5? > Would I be able save any money and still have a reliable motor? > > > Read this topic online here: > > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=352368#352368 > > > ============= > an> > 0-List">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List > =================== > ** > ronics.com">http://forums.matronics=== > > --> <http://forums.matronics.com> > http://www.matronics.com/contribution > ============ > > > * > > * > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 15, 2011
From: Kelly McMullen <kellym(at)aviating.com>
Subject: Re: Should I pop on this IO540?
Yes, was offered an engine today. I will probably need one in 4-6 months. 250hp carbureted Aztec engine. 5 yrs and 200 hours since major, narrow deck. No other information about who did the overhaul, etc. Seller wants 20K. Selling because Aztec airframe is bent and worthless, so trying to get his money back out of engines and avionics. I declined. Also was A1D5 version which lacks fuel injection and better counterweights in the C4B5 or A4D5 On 9/15/2011 3:20 PM, Robin Marks wrote: > Snip >> I would start the project first and order the engine later in > the build. Things happen, people "need" to stop building, some even > need to sell off their projects. Engines will come up, the prices may > as well but you will have options. > > I don't necessarily think that is an excellent price and as such with > all the potential unknowns would have me following Pascal's suggestion > and wait. A friend purchased a similar "sounding" engine for $10k. He > is now flying and the engine was a good deal to get flying but it is > making metal and it can not come close to the power generated by my > BPE engine. He comments every time we take off in my -10. > See how quickly this engine showed up? The same thing will happen > closer to the time you will actually need an engine. I say wait. > > Robin > > Sent from my iPad2. > > On Sep 15, 2011, at 12:23 PM, "Pascal" > wrote: > >> > >> >> Same here. I felt that new was overkill, specially since I wanted the >> old Narrow deck core. America's was first rate. >> Interestingly they had an engine with the same hours off a plane that >> was being parted out. America's would not sell the engine to me >> unless they first verified all was fine inside. All was close to new, >> but if it wasn't, than we would know for sure. When it comes to >> engines unless you open it up and see what's inside, you're guessing >> it's fine.. that was not a risk I was willing to take. I suppose >> documents and scopes would work..but I am "trusting" it's accurate. >> If you're A&P is reliable and can scope and do everything for you to >> assure it's solid, you may be fine. >> People have left engines sitting for years, but they were building >> already, you are planning to put off a 10k investment in a tail kit >> but are willing to spend 15K on a engine you wont need for a while? >> I would start the project first and order the engine later in the >> build. Things happen, people "need" to stop building, some even need >> to sell off their projects. Engines will come up, the prices may as >> well but you will have options. >> Best of success! >> Pascal >> >> -----Original Message----- From: Sohrab Kermanj >> Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2011 9:15 AM >> To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com >> Subject: Re: RV10-List: Should I pop on this IO540? >> >> > >> >> I bought a zero time engine with new cam and first run crank, new >> mags and overhauled accessories (fuel pump, servo) completely new top >> end from Americas Aircraft engine for less that twice that. No core >> was required. My vote is to talk to AAE. >> >> Rob Kermanj >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On Sep 15, 2011, at 11:47 AM, Rick > > wrote: >> >>> > >>> >>> It's on VAF for 17.9k >>> >>> Rick >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>> On Sep 15, 2011, at 8:14 AM, "EdKranz" >> > wrote: >>> >>>> > >>>> >>>> I'm not planning on ordering my tail kit until after the holiday >>>> season is over, and I didn't think I'd need to worry about a motor >>>> for a few more years... but... >>>> >>>> I just got an email from a A&P friend of mine who knows I'm going >>>> to be building. He says that he found an IO540 D4A5 for me. It's >>>> currently on another plane that they are going to be downsizing to >>>> a 200HP motor. >>>> >>>> It has 890 hours on it, "Not damaged, no prop strikes" and he's >>>> going to sell it with all the accessories. It has Bendix mags. >>>> >>>> I had always figured I'd go the new route with either a Barrett or >>>> Aerosports engine, but if the price is right, and I can be >>>> CONFIDENT in the motor, I might consider this route. >>>> >>>> I don't have a firm price that he is asking yet, but he said "about >>>> 1/3 the new cost" that he looked up on the Vans website... so I'm >>>> guessing around $15,000. >>>> >>>> What are your opinions on this? What is the cost of a rebuild on a >>>> D4A5? Would I be able save any money and still have a reliable motor? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Read this topic online here: >>>> >>>> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=352368#352368 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> ============= >> an> >> 0-List">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List >> =================== >> < span=""> >> ronics.com">http://forums.matronics== >> --> <http://forums.matronics.com>http://www.matronics.com/contribution >> ============ >> >> >> >> <> > * > > > * ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: WingX question
From: Michael Kraus <n223rv(at)wolflakeairport.net>
Date: Sep 16, 2011
On Foreflight, you can buy one subscription and it works For both the iPhone and iPad. Is it the same for WingX, or do you need 2 subscriptions? One for ipad and one for iPhone? Sent from my iPhone ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 16, 2011
Subject: Re: Should I pop on this IO540?
From: Jerald Folkerts <jfolkerts1(at)gmail.com>
My rebuild cost approx 6k from a local shop. Of course, it would depend on condition. I would just put it on and run it. However, before they remove it have them properly preserve it. Preservation kits are approx $200. Jerry Folkerts On Thursday, September 15, 2011, Kelly McMullen wrote: > > Yes, was offered an engine today. I will probably need one in 4-6 months. 250hp carbureted Aztec engine. 5 yrs and 200 hours since major, narrow deck. No other information about who did the overhaul, etc. Seller wants 20K. Selling because Aztec airframe is bent and worthless, so trying to get his money back out of engines and avionics. I declined. Also was A1D5 version which lacks fuel injection and better counterweights in the C4B5 or A4D5 > > On 9/15/2011 3:20 PM, Robin Marks wrote: >> >> Snip >> I would start the project first and order the engine later in the build. Things happen, people "need" to stop building, some even need to sell off their projects. Engines will come up, the prices may as well but you will have options. >> >> I don't necessarily think that is an excellent price and as such with all the potential unknowns would have me following Pascal's suggestion and wait. A friend purchased a similar "sounding" engine for $10k. He is now flying and the engine was a good deal to get flying but it is making metal and it can not come close to the power generated by my BPE engine. He comments every time we take off in my -10. >> See how quickly this engine showed up? The same thing will happen closer to the time you will actually need an engine. I say wait. >> >> Robin >> >> Sent from my iPad2. >> >> On Sep 15, 2011, at 12:23 PM, "Pascal" > wrote: >> rv10flyer(at)verizon.net>> >>> >>> Same here. I felt that new was overkill, specially since I wanted the old Narrow deck core. America's was first rate. >>> Interestingly they had an engine with the same hours off a plane that was being parted out. America's would not sell the engine to me unless they first verified all was fine inside. All was close to new, but if it wasn't, than we would know for sure. When it comes to engines unless you open it up and see what's inside, you're guessing it's fine.. that was not a risk I was willing to take. I suppose documents and scopes would work..but I am "trusting" it's accurate. >>> If you're A&P is reliable and can scope and do everything for you to assure it's solid, you may be fine. >>> People have left engines sitting for years, but they were building already, you are planning to put off a 10k investment in a tail kit but are willing to spend 15K on a engine you wont need for a while? >>> I would start the project first and order the engine later in the build. Things happen, people "need" to stop building, some even need to sell off their projects. Engines will come up, the prices may as well but you will have options. >>> Best of success! >>> Pascal >>> >>> -----Original Message----- From: Sohrab Kermanj >>> Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2011 9:15 AM >>> To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com >>> Subject: Re: RV10-List: Should I pop on this IO540? >>> flysrv10(at)gmail.com>> >>> >>> I bought a zero time engine with new cam and first run crank, new mags and overhauled accessories (fuel pump, servo) completely new top end from Americas Aircraft engine for less that twice that. No core was required. My vote is to talk to AAE. >>> >>> Rob Kermanj >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>> On Sep 15, 2011, at 11:47 AM, Rick > wrote: >>> ricksked(at)cox.net>> >>>> >>>> It's on VAF for 17.9k >>>> >>>> Rick >>>> >>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>> >>>> On Sep 15, 2011, at 8:14 AM, "EdKranz" > wrote: >>>> ed.kranz(at)gmail.com>> >>>>> >>>>> I'm not planning on ordering my tail kit until after the holiday season is over, and I didn't think I'd need to worry about a motor for a few more years... but... >>>>> >>>>> I just got an email from a A&P friend of mine who knows I'm going to be building. He says that he found an IO540 D4A5 for me. It's currently on another plane that they are going to be downsizing to a 200HP motor. >>>>> >>>>> It has 890 hours on it, "Not damaged, no prop strikes" and he's going to sell it with all the accessories. It has Bendix mags. >>>>> >>>>> I had always figured I'd go the new route with either a Barrett or Aerosports engine, but if the price is right, and I can be CONFIDENT in the motor, I might consider this route. >>>>> >>>>> I don't have a firm price that he is asking yet, but he said "about 1/3 the new cost" that he looked up on the Vans website... so I'm guessing around $15,000. >>>>> >>>>> What are your opinions on this? What is the cost of a rebuild on a D4A5? Would I be able save any money and still have a reliable motor? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Read this topic online here: >>>>> >>>>> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=352368#352368 < http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=352368#352368> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ============= >>> an> >>> 0-List">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List >>> =================== >>> < span=""> >>> ronics.com <http://ronics.com>">http://forums.matronics== >>> --> <http://forums.matronics.com>http://www.matronics.com/contribution >>> ============ >>> >>> >>> >>> <> >> >> * >> >> >> * > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Dash board edge trim
From: "johngoodman" <johngoodman(at)earthlink.net>
Date: Sep 16, 2011
I got some rubber edge trim from McMaster-Carr. Here is a link: http://www.mcmaster.com/#trim-molding/=e37ooh As far as the covering on the glareshield, I painted the metal flat black. So far it has held up great. For the avionics vent fans, I went with some 80mm computer fans with a flush grill cover, that double as defoggers. John -------- #40572 First flight was on 25 June, 2011 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=352468#352468 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 16, 2011
Subject: Re: Dash board edge trim
From: Rob Kochman <rv10rob(at)gmail.com>
Same here--flat black paint looks great. I used the Cleveland ending. I did not add a vent/defrost fan, which is my biggest regret thus far. It's way too hot behind the panel. -Rob 80 hours On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 10:03 AM, johngoodman wrote: > > I got some rubber edge trim from McMaster-Carr. Here is a link: > http://www.mcmaster.com/#trim-molding/=e37ooh > > As far as the covering on the glareshield, I painted the metal flat black. > So far it has held up great. For the avionics vent fans, I went with some > 80mm computer fans with a flush grill cover, that double as defoggers. > > John > > -------- > #40572 First flight was on 25 June, 2011 > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=352468#352468 > > -- Rob Kochman RV-10 Flying since March 2011 Woodinville, WA http://kochman.net/N819K ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 16, 2011
From: Chris <toaster73(at)embarqmail.com>
Subject: Re: Dash board edge trim
John, Sounds good, I too have flat black paint and 2 fans, do you know what exact Mcmaster part number you got, the link just takes me to the many choices. Thanks Chris ----- Original Message ----- From: johngoodman <johngoodman(at)earthlink.net> Subject: RV10-List: Re: Dash board edge trim I got some rubber edge trim from McMaster-Carr. Here is a link: http://www.mcmaster.com/#trim-molding/=e37ooh As far as the covering on the glareshield, I painted the metal flat black. So far it has held up great. For the avionics vent fans, I went with some 80mm computer fans with a flush grill cover, that double as defoggers. John -------- #40572 First flight was on 25 June, 2011 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=352468#352468 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 16, 2011
From: "Fred Williams, M.D." <drfred(at)suddenlinkmail.com>
Subject: Re: Dash board edge trim
I used the flat black paint and the edge cover and it has worked well for me. Make sure you put in _black_ fan grill covers! Don't use the shiny ones or you will have the reflection in your windshield. Don't ask me how I know....... Dr Fred. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: David <dmaib(at)mac.com>
Subject: Re: Dash board edge trim
Date: Sep 16, 2011
I too painted the panel top flat back and could not be happier with it. I used some trim from an auto parts store that looks pretty much like the far right choice in the top row of John's link. I also used the same trim for my wing-to-fuselage gap and it has worked great, David Maib 40559 Flying just turned over 400 hours. On Sep 16, 2011, at 2:55 PM, Chris wrote: > > John, > Sounds good, I too have flat black paint and 2 fans, do you know > what exact Mcmaster part number you got, the link just takes me to > the many choices. > Thanks > Chris > ----- Original Message ----- > From: johngoodman <johngoodman(at)earthlink.net> > To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: RV10-List: Re: Dash board edge trim > > > > I got some rubber edge trim from McMaster-Carr. Here is a link: > http://www.mcmaster.com/#trim-molding/=e37ooh > > As far as the covering on the glareshield, I painted the metal flat > black. So far it has held up great. For the avionics vent fans, I > went with some 80mm computer fans with a flush grill cover, that > double as defoggers. > > John > > -------- > #40572 First flight was on 25 June, 2011 > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=352468#352468 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Dash board edge trim
From: "johngoodman" <johngoodman(at)earthlink.net>
Date: Sep 16, 2011
Chris, The one I ordered was Style 6, 8507K15 - 6 feet. But, a lot of the others will fit as well. Since you are already there, take a look at 1120A411. That's the stuff I used for the door edge trim - I love it. John toaster73(at)embarqmail.c wrote: > John, > Sounds good, I too have flat black paint and 2 fans, do you know what exact Mcmaster part number you got, the link just takes me to the many choices. > Thanks > Chris > --- -------- #40572 First flight was on 25 June, 2011 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=352488#352488 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Dash board edge trim
From: David Leikam <arplnplt(at)gmail.com>
Date: Sep 16, 2011
I used black spray on truck bed liner for my dash. Very tough and has a nice textured finish. Dave Leikam On Sep 16, 2011, at 1:55 PM, Chris wrote: > > John, > Sounds good, I too have flat black paint and 2 fans, do you know what exact Mcmaster part number you got, the link just takes me to the many choices. > Thanks > Chris > ----- Original Message ----- > From: johngoodman <johngoodman(at)earthlink.net> > To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: RV10-List: Re: Dash board edge trim > > > I got some rubber edge trim from McMaster-Carr. Here is a link: > http://www.mcmaster.com/#trim-molding/=e37ooh > > As far as the covering on the glareshield, I painted the metal flat black. So far it has held up great. For the avionics vent fans, I went with some 80mm computer fans with a flush grill cover, that double as defoggers. > > John > > -------- > #40572 First flight was on 25 June, 2011 > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=352468#352468 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Ronald Simonton" <simie1(at)knology.net>
Subject: Re: WingX question
Date: Sep 17, 2011
I have both WingX and Foreflight ----- WingX only works on my iPad --- Foreflight works on iPad and iPhone ------ overall I prefer WingX, but wish it would transfer to my iPhone. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: WingX question
From: Michael Kraus <n223rv(at)wolflakeairport.net>
Date: Sep 17, 2011
<> So that's the deal breaker for me. Foreflight works on both. I use it in m y iPhone 90% and iPad 10% (probably because I always carry the iPhone). I d on't want to drop another $100 if I can't use it on both. I'll stick with m y Foreflight!! -Mike Kraus Sent from my iPhone On Sep 17, 2011, at 7:33 AM, "Ronald Simonton" wrote: > I have both WingX and Foreflight ----- WingX only works on my iPad --- For eflight works on iPad and iPhone ------ overall I prefer WingX, but wish it w ould transfer to my iPhone. > > > ========================== ========= ========================== ========= ========================== ========= ========================== ========= > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: WingX question
From: Tim Olson <Tim(at)MyRV10.com>
Date: Sep 17, 2011
Well, wingX *is* on both my iPhone and ipad, but it does mostly suck on the i Phone. I've been shocked that they don't focus any effort on it. I still stand by my earlier assessment that WingX is better in flight (on ip ad) than foreflight, but foreflight is better pre-flight by far. For those flying lots of IFR, wingX with georeferenced charts add-on is grea t. Then still keep a NON-Georef subscription to foreflight and you get all y ou need to do it all. If you want to save money then drop the georeferencing. If you don't fly IFR I'd skip ALL georeferencing and maybe just do forefligh t. The biggest benefits of wingX become more useful when flying IFR and man ipulating approach plates and charts, and the georef taxi diagrams. I had to laugh when seeing the 3D garmin 796....what a joke. Like seeing a 3 D airplane in the middle of the screen will do anything for you. They call i t ipad killer but that product is a real joke at over 2000$. You coould buy an ipad AND wingX and foreflight AND data subscriptions for many years for t hat price. And it weighs much more and is thicker and smaller and less usef ul for other things you may want, and still has less battery life. Foreflig hts last announcement email says that they plan XM weather in their next rel ease or version....soon. And you can already get ADS-B on some software. I t's still evolving. A 796 is likely to stay as-is until the 896 comes out. I used to love garmin handhelds, but today it seems a bit like the days of m y initial GPS systems....when garmins non-aviation boxes were limited to 90k ts to force you to pay more for aviation models. Their glory days of the 396/496 are now behind them and they will have to pl ay catch-up better than they are....even their phone apps are released with l ess feature for more money. Tim On Sep 17, 2011, at 6:33 AM, "Ronald Simonton" wrote: > I have both WingX and Foreflight ----- WingX only works on my iPad --- For eflight works on iPad and iPhone ------ overall I prefer WingX, but wish it w ould transfer to my iPhone. > > > ========================== ========= ========================== ========= ========================== ========= ========================== ========= > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Albert Gardner" <ibspud(at)roadrunner.com>
Subject: WingX question
Date: Sep 17, 2011
I first used an ipad on my 5 week jaunt around the country and learned to love it. Takes some getting used to and I really looking to their adding weather. I have an 496 and will probably keep it just for that reason until they do and maybe even after for backup. Haven=99t used WingX, I=99m VFR only but Foreflight is great. I prefer the airport info from FlightguideEFB but Foreflight is adequate. I miss having the reverse side of TAC charts though. That=99s the side that has the VFR routes through class B. Fuel prices are nice to have but you=99d better call to verify. Otherwise it seems they just raised them yesterday. Haven=99t found a great way to mount the ipad yet. Albert Gardner N991RV Yuma AZ From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Tim Olson Sent: Saturday, September 17, 2011 6:29 AM Subject: Re: RV10-List: WingX question Well, wingX *is* on both my iPhone and ipad, but it does mostly suck on the iPhone. I've been shocked that they don't focus any effort on it. I still stand by my earlier assessment that WingX is better in flight (on ipad) than foreflight, but foreflight is better pre-flight by far. For those flying lots of IFR, wingX with georeferenced charts add-on is great. Then still keep a NON-Georef subscription to foreflight and you get all you need to do it all. If you want to save money then drop the georeferencing. If you don't fly IFR I'd skip ALL georeferencing and maybe just do foreflight. The biggest benefits of wingX become more useful when flying IFR and manipulating approach plates and charts, and the georef taxi diagrams. I had to laugh when seeing the 3D garmin 796....what a joke. Like seeing a 3D airplane in the middle of the screen will do anything for you. They call it ipad killer but that product is a real joke at over 2000$. You coould buy an ipad AND wingX and foreflight AND data subscriptions for many years for that price. And it weighs much more and is thicker and smaller and less useful for other things you may want, and still has less battery life. Foreflights last announcement email says that they plan XM weather in their next release or version....soon. And you can already get ADS-B on some software. It's still evolving. A 796 is likely to stay as-is until the 896 comes out. I used to love garmin handhelds, but today it seems a bit like the days of my initial GPS systems....when garmins non-aviation boxes were limited to 90kts to force you to pay more for aviation models. Their glory days of the 396/496 are now behind them and they will have to play catch-up better than they are....even their phone apps are released with less feature for more money. Tim On Sep 17, 2011, at 6:33 AM, "Ronald Simonton" wrote: I have both WingX and Foreflight ----- WingX only works on my iPad --- Foreflight works on iPad and iPhone ------ overall I prefer WingX, but wish it would transfer to my iPhone. ========= ref="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List">http://www.matronics .com/Navigator?RV10-List ========= ums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com ========= http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/contribut ion ========= ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Horrible Crash at the Reno Air Races
From: "AirMike" <Mikeabel(at)Pacbell.net>
Date: Sep 17, 2011
My wife and I volunteer every year for line security at the Reno Air Races. Yesterday was a truly tragic day at the races and could spell the end of the event for all times. We had just finished our shift at a remote entry gate, and had been touring the venue on the East end of the field. We were sitting in the cockpit of a C17 military aircraft when we looked to the west end of the field and saw the crash of the P51. It was truly a horrible sight to see and we were stunned at the horror of the crash, not realizing at the time the sheer magnitude of the crash and the number of casualties. As directed we left the field immediately and went home All of our friends and fellow volunteers with EAA 1073 are ok also. I do not see how these races can continue. they have been canceled for the rest of this weekend. Who will sell RARA the insurance for such an event next year? The crash occurred about mid field, just outside the box seats on the front row. The crash debris was propelled to the north - away from the crowd. It now seems clear that it was caused by failure of the trim tab (See pic at KOLOTV.com). As tragic as the crash was, if it were only slightly to the south, the casualties would have increased exponentially. All in all a sad day for RARA, Reno and all of the aviation community. -------- See you OSH '12 Q/B - flying 2 yrs. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=352524#352524 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Chris" <toaster73(at)embarqmail.com>
Subject: Elevator Rig
Date: Sep 17, 2011
Thanks for the replies on the dash trim piece!! now on to the next question I have... I have the elevator rigged with the jig called out on page 39-10 figure 1. This results in the inside AN3-10 bolt on the bottom of the WD-1011L/R stick base weldment hitting the 1033-L/R control column mount at the full aft stick and full left or right roll. Archives seem to point toward discounting the jig and I guess the fix is to shorten the F-1089 and/or F-1090 to bring the WD-1011-L/R lower bolts aft and away from the 1033 while still maintaining the desired full up elevator deflection and contact to elevator stops. Doing this would basically ignore the jig setting, and thats ok?? I put the head of the bolts in opposite what the plans show and still have contact. Thanks for any input. -Chris #40072 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 17, 2011
Subject: Re: Horrible Crash at the Reno Air Races
From: John Cox <rv10pro(at)gmail.com>
I had several friends in the box seats. They have not checked in and Reno hospitals are only talking to direct family members. PRAYERS out to everyone connected. Spent the morning giving a pint to the bank. Thinking of flying in to give it direct to RNO. John On Sep 17, 2011 11:18 AM, "AirMike" wrote: > > My wife and I volunteer every year for line security at the Reno Air Races. Yesterday was a truly tragic day at the races and could spell the end of the event for all times. We had just finished our shift at a remote entry gate, and had been touring the venue on the East end of the field. We were sitting in the cockpit of a C17 military aircraft when we looked to the west end of the field and saw the crash of the P51. > It was truly a horrible sight to see and we were stunned at the horror of the crash, not realizing at the time the sheer magnitude of the crash and the number of casualties. As directed we left the field immediately and went home All of our friends and fellow volunteers with EAA 1073 are ok also. I do not see how these races can continue. they have been canceled for the rest of this weekend. Who will sell RARA the insurance for such an event next year? > > The crash occurred about mid field, just outside the box seats on the front row. The crash debris was propelled to the north - away from the crowd. It now seems clear that it was caused by failure of the trim tab (See pic at KOLOTV.com). As tragic as the crash was, if it were only slightly to the south, the casualties would have increased exponentially. All in all a sad day for RARA, Reno and all of the aviation community. > > -------- > See you OSH '12 > Q/B - flying 2 yrs. > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=352524#352524 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Elevator Rig
From: "Bob Turner" <bobturner(at)alum.rpi.edu>
Date: Sep 17, 2011
I recall having the same issue; however, mine was fixed by reversing the direction of the bolts, which you say you have already done. You certainly do not want them catching, you need to fine tune as needed to avoid that. Of course, you may have trouble at the other end, too, with the stick hitting the instrument panel. Depends on what stick grip you use. I was able (but not with a lot of margin) find a setting that avoided both problems. good luck. -------- Bob Turner RV-10 QB Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=352562#352562 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 18, 2011
From: Bill Watson <Mauledriver(at)nc.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Elevator Rig
Re the stick hitting the panel. Can be dependent on panel choice but seems like even the standard panel needs to have the stick modified a bit. I bent mine to reduce it's height. Others have cut and welded to shorten it and move it back a bit from the panel. Bill On 9/18/2011 12:57 AM, Bob Turner wrote: > --> RV10-List message posted by: "Bob Turner" > > I recall having the same issue; however, mine was fixed by reversing the direction of the bolts, which you say you have already done. > > You certainly do not want them catching, you need to fine tune as needed to avoid that. Of course, you may have trouble at the other end, too, with the stick hitting the instrument panel. Depends on what stick grip you use. I was able (but not with a lot of margin) find a setting that avoided both problems. > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Chris" <toaster73(at)embarqmail.com>
Subject: Re: Elevator Rig
Date: Sep 18, 2011
Thanks for the insight again Bob/Bill, I was able shorten the 1089 and 1090 a bit and get everything to miss everything. For good measure I carefully rounded the corner of the 1033 control support along its lower outside edge. My coolie hat on the right stick just misses the bottom of the panel. My left stick is fine. There seems to be a slight difference in the weldments between left and right stick, the left stick cleared the 1033 before the right. With this set up my jig for the stick neutral is about a half of bolt hole off, I think this is will be ok. Also no interfernce is seen on any of the control rods and bellcranks going back to the elevators. Thanks Chris #40072 N919AR W & B coming up! -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Bill Watson Sent: Sunday, September 18, 2011 1:18 AM Subject: Re: RV10-List: Re: Elevator Rig Re the stick hitting the panel. Can be dependent on panel choice but seems like even the standard panel needs to have the stick modified a bit. I bent mine to reduce it's height. Others have cut and welded to shorten it and move it back a bit from the panel. Bill On 9/18/2011 12:57 AM, Bob Turner wrote: > --> RV10-List message posted by: "Bob Turner" > > I recall having the same issue; however, mine was fixed by reversing the direction of the bolts, which you say you have already done. > > You certainly do not want them catching, you need to fine tune as needed to avoid that. Of course, you may have trouble at the other end, too, with the stick hitting the instrument panel. Depends on what stick grip you use. I was able (but not with a lot of margin) find a setting that avoided both problems. > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Rene" <rene(at)felker.com>
Subject: Trip to Phoenix
Date: Sep 18, 2011
I might have to fly down to Phoenix this week. Looks like Deer Valley or Scottsdale are the closest.....Deer Valley looks better from a cost perspective. Any opinions from the locals or other who have been down there. I will be coming from Utah. Rene' 801-721-6080 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Carl Froehlich" <carl.froehlich(at)verizon.net>
Subject: Need some measurements
Date: Sep 19, 2011
Fighting an exhaust system fit up problem. Need two measurements: - On the standard Van's cowl, the width of the bottom cowl air exhaust opening - On the standard Vetterman's exhaust system, the distance between the outside edge of the two heat muffs. In other words, looking for the width of the exhaust system in the lower portion of the cowl. Thanks, Carl ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Trip to Phoenix
From: David McNeill <dlm34077(at)q.com>
Date: Sep 19, 2011
I will call later today. Inflight now Sent from my iPad On Sep 18, 2011, at 22:21, "Rene" wrote: > > I might have to fly down to Phoenix this week. Looks like Deer Valley or > Scottsdale are the closest.....Deer Valley looks better from a cost > perspective. Any opinions from the locals or other who have been down > there. > > I will be coming from Utah. > > Rene' > 801-721-6080 > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 19, 2011
From: Kelly McMullen <kellym(at)aviating.com>
Subject: Re: Trip to Phoenix
Closest to your ground destination or shortest flight? Falcon or Chandler have significantly cheaper fuel prices. Most downtown Phoenix destinations are ~30 min drive from any of the area GA airports. They all have nearby freeway access for quick trip into town at other than rush hour. DVT is very busy with Chinese flight students. SDL is very busy with corporate jets. Deems is based at DVT and can give detailed current info there. There are a couple flying -10s at FFZ and at least one at CHD as well as several projects in various stages. The main thing to keep in mind for Phoenix area is that the Tracon generally does not work GA traffic for anything but the VFR transition cooridor over PHX, so you have to plan your descent to be underneath the Class B. (ie less friendly than SLC approach). On 9/18/2011 8:21 PM, Rene wrote: > --> RV10-List message posted by: "Rene" > > I might have to fly down to Phoenix this week. Looks like Deer Valley or > Scottsdale are the closest.....Deer Valley looks better from a cost > perspective. Any opinions from the locals or other who have been down > there. > > I will be coming from Utah. > > Rene' > 801-721-6080 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Trip to Phoenix
From: John Ackerman <johnag5b(at)cableone.net>
Date: Sep 19, 2011
I'll second all that stuff that Kelly wrote. DVT has a reputation for interminable taxi times. I haven't been to FFZ lately, but it used to be a great place to visit. I hear that it is busier now, too. If you get anywhere near the Phoenix class B, be exceedingly careful. Phoenix tracon is MUCH less GA friendly than the other tracons in the western US. They will commonly give vectors into the B without corresponding clearance. If that happens, it's the pilot who takes the punishment, and the likelihood that you will be violated if you bust the B is high. Watch out. Be especially careful on takeoff from FFZ to the SW. The way I like to handle it is to use flight following and get a B clearance if Phoenix tracon will issue one. Sometimes they will, sometimes they won't, and it's not necessarily related to the amount of traffic you hear on whatever frequency you're on. Be aware of the Luke AFB SATR airspace west of Phoenix. Special rules apply, see: http://www.luke.af.mil/shared/media/document/AFD-081107-056.pdf You must talk to Luke RAPCON. Lots of F16s there. On Sep 19, 2011, at 6:51 AM, Kelly McMullen wrote: > > Closest to your ground destination or shortest flight? Falcon or Chandler have significantly cheaper fuel prices. Most downtown Phoenix destinations are ~30 min drive from any of the area GA airports. They all have nearby freeway access for quick trip into town at other than rush hour. > DVT is very busy with Chinese flight students. SDL is very busy with corporate jets. Deems is based at DVT and can give detailed current info there. There are a couple flying -10s at FFZ and at least one at CHD as well as several projects in various stages. The main thing to keep in mind for Phoenix area is that the Tracon generally does not work GA traffic for anything but the VFR transition cooridor over PHX, so you have to plan your descent to be underneath the Class B. (ie less friendly than SLC approach). > > On 9/18/2011 8:21 PM, Rene wrote: >> --> RV10-List message posted by: "Rene" >> >> I might have to fly down to Phoenix this week. Looks like Deer Valley or >> Scottsdale are the closest.....Deer Valley looks better from a cost >> perspective. Any opinions from the locals or other who have been down >> there. >> >> I will be coming from Utah. >> >> Rene' >> 801-721-6080 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Rene Felker" <rene(at)felker.com>
Subject: Trip to Phoenix
Date: Sep 19, 2011
I think we lost our connection again. Thanks for the info. I think I will try Falcon. Let you know how it goes. Rene' Felker N423CF 801-721-6080 -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of David McNeill Sent: Monday, September 19, 2011 6:43 AM Subject: Re: RV10-List: Trip to Phoenix I will call later today. Inflight now Sent from my iPad On Sep 18, 2011, at 22:21, "Rene" wrote: > > I might have to fly down to Phoenix this week. Looks like Deer Valley or > Scottsdale are the closest.....Deer Valley looks better from a cost > perspective. Any opinions from the locals or other who have been down > there. > > I will be coming from Utah. > > Rene' > 801-721-6080 > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 19, 2011
From: Kelly McMullen <kellym(at)aviating.com>
Subject: Re: Trip to Phoenix
Just as bad as the taxi delays...they will land you on the north runway, often making you turn off the runway to the north, then make 5 frequency changes between ground and tower freqs to get to the terminal on the south side. (ground to taxi to crossing taxiway, north tower to cross north runway, ground to taxi between runways, south tower to cross south runway, ground to cross parallel taxiway to ramp) On 9/19/2011 7:57 AM, John Ackerman wrote: > --> RV10-List message posted by: John Ackerman > > I'll second all that stuff that Kelly wrote. DVT has a reputation for interminable taxi times. I haven't been to FFZ lately, but it used to be a great place to visit. I hear that it is busier now, too. > > enerous support! > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 19, 2011
From: Bruce Johnson <bruce1hwjohnson(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Trip to Phoenix
DVT isn't is bad as all that, they do get busy with the flight training, bu t FFZ has that-also. Class B starts about 20 miles N of DVT and it comes down gradually like you will be doing. Gas is not cheap and is about .50 ce nts cheaper at Chandler, haven't bought any recently at FFZ. Enjoy your fli ght--=0A=0A=0AFrom: Rene <rene(at)felker.com>=0ATo: rv10-list(at)matronics.co m=0ASent: Sunday, September 18, 2011 8:21 PM=0ASubject: RV10-List: Trip to =0AI might have to fly down to Phoenix this week.- Looks like Deer Valley or=0AScottsdale are the closest.....Deer Valley looks better from a cost =0Aperspective.- Any opinions from the locals or other who have been down =0Athere.- =0A=0AI will be coming from Utah.=0A=0ARene'=0A801-721-6080=0A =============== ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Jim Beyer <fehdxlbb(at)gmail.com>
Date: Sep 19, 2011
Subject: Re: Trip to Phoenix
SSd2ZSBmbG93biBpbnRvIERWVCBhIGNvdXBsZSB0aW1lcy7CoCBJZiB5b3Ugd2FudCB0aGUgRkJP IHNlcnZpY2UsIEkgdGhpbmsgdGhlcmUgYXJlIHR3byB0byBjaG9vc2UgZnJvbS7CoCBPciwgaWYg eW91IHdhbnQgbWluIGV4cGVuc2UsIHRoZXJlIGlzIGEgc2VsZi1zZXJ2ZSBwdW1wIG9uIHRoZSBu b3J0aCBzaWRlIGFuZCBmcmVlIDQ4IGhvdXIgcGFya2luZyBvbiB0aGUgc291dGggc2lkZSBpbiBm cm9udCBvZiB0aGUgcHVibGljICd0ZXJtaW5hbCcuwqAgCgpNaWdodCBtZW50aW9uIHlvdSBhcmUg J3RyYW5zaWVudCcgdG8gdG93ZXIuICBUaGV5IHdhbnRlZCBtZSB0byBmbHkgYSBwYXR0ZXJuIGJh c2VkIGxvY2FsIGxhbmRtYXJrcyB0aGF0IHdlcmVuJ3QgZXh0cmVtZWx5IG9idmlvdXMuICAKClll cyBJIHdhaXRlZCBsb25nZXIgdG8gdGFrZW9mZiB0aGFuIG5vcm1hbC4uLmJ1dCBpdCB3YXNuJ3Qg dGhhdCBiYWQuCgpGbHkgc2FmZSwgCgpKaW0KCgoKU2VudCB2aWEgRHJvaWRYMiBvbiBWZXJpem9u IFdpcmVsZXNz4oSiCgotLS0tLU9yaWdpbmFsIG1lc3NhZ2UtLS0tLQpGcm9tOiBSZW5lIDxyZW5l QGZlbGtlci5jb20+ClRvOiBydjEwLWxpc3RAbWF0cm9uaWNzLmNvbQpTZW50OiBNb24sIFNlcCAx OSwgMjAxMSAwMzozMDo1NSBHTVQrMDA6MDAKU3ViamVjdDogUlYxMC1MaXN0OiBUcmlwIHRvIFBo b2VuaXgKCi0tPiBSVjEwLUxpc3QgbWVzc2FnZSBwb3N0ZWQgYnk6ICJSZW5lIiA8cmVuZUBmZWxr ZXIuY29tPgoKSSBtaWdodCBoYXZlIHRvIGZseSBkb3duIHRvIFBob2VuaXggdGhpcyB3ZWVrLiAg IExvb2tzIGxpa2UgRGVlciBWYWxsZXkgb3IKU2NvdHRzZGFsZSBhcmUgdGhlIGNsb3Nlc3QuLi4u LkRlZXIgVmFsbGV5IGxvb2tzIGJldHRlciBmcm9tIGEgY29zdApwZXJzcGVjdGl2ZS4gIEFueSBv cGluaW9ucyBmcm9tIHRoZSBsb2NhbHMgb3Igb3RoZXIgd2hvIGhhdmUgYmVlbiBkb3duCnRoZXJl LiAgCgpJIHdpbGwgYmUgY29taW5nIGZyb20gVXRhaC4KClJlbmUnCjgwMS03MjEtNjA4MAoKCgoK Xy09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT0KXy09ICAgICAgICAgIC0gVGhlIFJWMTAtTGlzdCBFbWFpbCBGb3J1bSAtCl8tPSBVc2Ug dGhlIE1hdHJvbmljcyBMaXN0IEZlYXR1cmVzIE5hdmlnYXRvciB0byBicm93c2UKXy09IHRoZSBt YW55IExpc3QgdXRpbGl0aWVzIHN1Y2ggYXMgTGlzdCBVbi9TdWJzY3JpcHRpb24sCl8tPSBBcmNo aXZlIFNlYXJjaCAmIERvd25sb2FkLCA3LURheSBCcm93c2UsIENoYXQsIEZBUSwKXy09IFBob3Rv c2hhcmUsIGFuZCBtdWNoIG11Y2ggbW9yZToKXy09Cl8tPSAgIC0tPiBodHRwOi8vd3d3Lm1hdHJv bmljcy5jb20vTmF2aWdhdG9yP1JWMTAtTGlzdApfLT0KXy09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT0KXy09ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg LSBNQVRST05JQ1MgV0VCIEZPUlVNUyAtCl8tPSBTYW1lIGdyZWF0IGNvbnRlbnQgYWxzbyBhdmFp bGFibGUgdmlhIHRoZSBXZWIgRm9ydW1zIQpfLT0KXy09ICAgLS0+IGh0dHA6Ly9mb3J1bXMubWF0 cm9uaWNzLmNvbQpfLT0KXy09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT0KXy09ICAgICAgICAgICAgIC0gTGlzdCBDb250cmlidXRpb24g V2ViIFNpdGUgLQpfLT0gIFRoYW5rIHlvdSBmb3IgeW91ciBnZW5lcm91cyBzdXBwb3J0IQpfLT0g ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAtTWF0dCBEcmFsbGUsIExpc3QgQWRtaW4uCl8t PSAgIC0tPiBodHRwOi8vd3d3Lm1hdHJvbmljcy5jb20vY29udHJpYnV0aW9uCl8tPT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09CgoKCg= ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Need some measurements
From: "rv10flyer" <wayne.gillispie(at)yahoo.com>
Date: Sep 20, 2011
Give me a few days and I will provide you with some. -------- Wayne Gillispie, A&P 5/93, PPC 10/08 Bldr# 40983SB Baffles then fuel/oil/exhaust. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=352754#352754 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Dynon Pitch Servo Mounting kit for sale.
From: "billz" <billz(at)roadrunner.com>
Date: Sep 21, 2011
I purchased the RV-10 pitch servo mounting kit from Dynon last year (7/10) and changed my mind. (I'm now going with a Trutrak.) This is Dynon part number 101020-006 which I paid $75 plus $20 shipping. All parts are new and unused. If someone is interested in purchasing this I would consider any reasonable offer. Contact me by email: billz(at)roadrunner.com Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=352850#352850 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Dynon Pitch Servo Mounting kit for sale.
From: Michael Kraus <n223rv(at)wolflakeairport.net>
Date: Sep 21, 2011
It will fit the TruTrack servo. Really don't need to change it out. Although electrically the servos are different, mechanically they are not. Just have TruTrack not sell you their install kit. Sent from my iPhone On Sep 21, 2011, at 9:39 AM, "billz" wrote: > > I purchased the RV-10 pitch servo mounting kit from Dynon last year (7/10) and changed my mind. (I'm now going with a Trutrak.) This is Dynon part number 101020-006 which I paid $75 plus $20 shipping. All parts are new and unused. > > If someone is interested in purchasing this I would consider any reasonable offer. > > Contact me by email: billz(at)roadrunner.com > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=352850#352850 > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: parking brake valve
From: "jayb" <jaybrinkmeyer(at)yahoo.com>
Date: Sep 21, 2011
Thanks for posting this. I pulled my PV-1 out and sent it in for re-work. The timing was perfect as my panel isn't yet in place. Re-work was simply adding two countersinks to allow the gaskets to seal better. I don't know how the change will work as I'm not yet using the valve. Cheers, Jay Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=352876#352876 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 21, 2011
From: Bill Watson <Mauledriver(at)nc.rr.com>
Subject: Re: parking brake valve
Glad to hear that. I put mine back in and re-bled the system. Haven't put in service yet but no leaks so far. Frankly, I'm still not clear on where the countersinks were done but no matter. Bill On 9/21/2011 1:47 PM, jayb wrote: > --> RV10-List message posted by: "jayb" > > Thanks for posting this. I pulled my PV-1 out and sent it in for re-work. The timing was perfect as my panel isn't yet in place. Re-work was simply adding two countersinks to allow the gaskets to seal better. I don't know how the change will work as I'm not yet using the valve. > > Cheers, > Jay > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=352876#352876 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Dynon Pitch Servo Mounting kit for sale.
From: "rvdave" <davidbf(at)centurytel.net>
Date: Sep 21, 2011
Bill, Don't know if you already have tru trak servos but I've decided to go with Dynon servos and am selling the TT servos--pitch and roll, I currently have. They are current with service bulletin upgrades. If you're interested they are available. -------- Dave Ford RV6 flying RV10 building Cadillac, MI Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=352907#352907 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Cumins" <jcumins(at)jcis.net>
Subject: Re: Dynon Pitch Servo Mounting kit for sale.
Date: Sep 21, 2011
David How much do you want for the TT servos. I am still on the wings so now might be the time to get them. John Cumins 40864 Wings -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of rvdave Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2011 5:27 PM Subject: RV10-List: Re: Dynon Pitch Servo Mounting kit for sale. Bill, Don't know if you already have tru trak servos but I've decided to go with Dynon servos and am selling the TT servos--pitch and roll, I currently have. They are current with service bulletin upgrades. If you're interested they are available. -------- Dave Ford RV6 flying RV10 building Cadillac, MI Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=352907#352907 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Dynon Pitch Servo Mounting kit for sale.
From: "rvdave" <davidbf(at)centurytel.net>
Date: Sep 21, 2011
John, I am selling the pair for $1800, they are DSB-C roll and the DCP-TOR pitch servos designated for the RV10. -------- Dave Ford RV6 flying RV10 building Cadillac, MI Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=352921#352921 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 22, 2011
From: Patrick Pulis <rv10free2fly(at)yahoo.com.au>
Subject: Hartzell Propeller - Spinner Template
For those not aware of the existence of the Hartzell propeller - spinner te mplate, I have attached same for your reference.=0A-=0ARegards from down- under.=0A-=0APatrick Pulis=0AAdelaide, South Australia ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Hartzell Propeller - Spinner Template
From: "rv10flyer" <wayne.gillispie(at)yahoo.com>
Date: Sep 22, 2011
Helps get you started for sure. -------- Wayne Gillispie, A&P 5/93, PPC 10/08 Bldr# 40983SB Baffles then fuel/oil/exhaust. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=353005#353005 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 23, 2011
From: Bill Watson <Mauledriver(at)nc.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Hartzell Propeller - Spinner Template
Indeed it does. I know someone was wondering about how to cut out the spinner before. I didn't know where the template was, but I used it and it worked perfectly without further modification. Bill On 9/22/2011 8:51 PM, rv10flyer wrote: > --> RV10-List message posted by: "rv10flyer" > > Helps get you started for sure. > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Dynon Pitch Servo Mounting kit for sale.
From: "Ron B." <ronbelliveau(at)eastlink.ca>
Date: Sep 23, 2011
Dave, have you heard when Dynon will have the RV-10 servos available? Last I checked they said before the end of this month, which is nearing fast. Ron Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=353060#353060 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Pascal" <rv10flyer(at)verizon.net>
Subject: Re: Dynon Pitch Servo Mounting kit for sale.
Date: Sep 23, 2011
I have the servos in my RV-10, they are installed and working. What are you looking for? 3.2 came out yesterday that is the only thing I believe Dynon was releasing this month. -----Original Message----- From: Ron B. Sent: Friday, September 23, 2011 12:52 PM Subject: RV10-List: Re: Dynon Pitch Servo Mounting kit for sale. Dave, have you heard when Dynon will have the RV-10 servos available? Last I checked they said before the end of this month, which is nearing fast. Ron Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=353060#353060 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 23, 2011
Subject: Dynon roll servo settings?
From: Rob Kochman <rv10rob(at)gmail.com>
Anyone have a good set of Dynon roll servo settings for the RV-10? I feel like I've tried everything, and still am not happy with the result. Nav mode is rock solid, but heading mode wanders all over the place. Thanks... -Rob -- Rob Kochman RV-10 Flying since March 2011 Woodinville, WA http://kochman.net/N819K ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Dynon Pitch Servo Mounting kit for sale.
From: Michael Kraus <n223rv(at)wolflakeairport.net>
Date: Sep 23, 2011
I've been flying my RV-10 since May, but I bought my Dynon Skyview and autopilot servos a year or two ago..... They work great! Sent from my iPhone On Sep 23, 2011, at 3:52 PM, "Ron B." wrote: > > Dave, have you heard when Dynon will have the RV-10 servos available? Last I checked they said before the end of this month, which is nearing fast. > Ron > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=353060#353060 > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Dynon roll servo settings?
From: Michael Kraus <n223rv(at)wolflakeairport.net>
Date: Sep 23, 2011
Which Dynon System do you have? I have the Skyview and used factory setting s. They've been pretty good for heading, but I'm still tweaking pitch. -Mi ke Kraus Sent from my iPhone On Sep 23, 2011, at 5:13 PM, Rob Kochman wrote: > Anyone have a good set of Dynon roll servo settings for the RV-10? I feel like I've tried everything, and still am not happy with the result. Nav mo de is rock solid, but heading mode wanders all over the place. > > Thanks... > > -Rob > > -- > Rob Kochman > RV-10 Flying since March 2011 > Woodinville, WA > http://kochman.net/N819K > > > ========================== ========= ========================== ========= ========================== ========= ========================== ========= > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Dynon Pitch Servo Mounting kit for sale.
From: "Ron B." <ronbelliveau(at)eastlink.ca>
Date: Sep 23, 2011
How is your Skyview AP working for you in the RV-10 with the standard servo? We are not able to use our AP at all, we had somewhat results with the SV-42 servos and tried upgrading to the SV-52 but the system is not usable (for us) with the SV-52 servos. Don't know why and we were told to hold tight until they released the linear actuated servos. Glad to hear your's is working properly. Ron Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=353069#353069 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Tire in Atlanta?
From: Jesse Saint <jesse(at)saintaviation.com>
Date: Sep 23, 2011
Is anybody on the list in the KLZU area that I could get a main tire from for an RV-10? I'm stranded until I get one & the local shop is out. Jesse Saint I-TEC, Inc. jesse(at)itecusa.org www.itecusa.org www.mavericklsa.com C: 352-427-0285 O: 352-465-4545 F: 815-377-3694 Sent from my iPhone ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 23, 2011
From: Linn Walters <pitts_pilot(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: Tire in Atlanta?
There is a very active EAA chapter at LZU. You should be able to get hold of someone through the FBO. The FBO I used had copies of the chapter newsletter on the table. Linn On 9/23/2011 7:14 PM, Jesse Saint wrote: > --> RV10-List message posted by: Jesse Saint > > Is anybody on the list in the KLZU area that I could get a main tire from for an RV-10? I'm stranded until I get one& the local shop is out. > > Jesse Saint > I-TEC, Inc. > jesse(at)itecusa.org > www.itecusa.org > www.mavericklsa.com > C: 352-427-0285 > O: 352-465-4545 > F: 815-377-3694 > > Sent from my iPhone > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 23, 2011
From: Linn Walters <pitts_pilot(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: Tire in Atlanta?
Hit 'send too quickly' LZU EAA website is at http://www.690.eaachapter.org/ Phone # at the hangar .... 770 339-0804 Hope this helped!!! Linn On 9/23/2011 7:14 PM, Jesse Saint wrote: > --> RV10-List message posted by: Jesse Saint > > Is anybody on the list in the KLZU area that I could get a main tire from for an RV-10? I'm stranded until I get one& the local shop is out. > > Jesse Saint > I-TEC, Inc. > jesse(at)itecusa.org > www.itecusa.org > www.mavericklsa.com > C: 352-427-0285 > O: 352-465-4545 > F: 815-377-3694 > > Sent from my iPhone > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Pascal" <rv10flyer(at)verizon.net>
Subject: Re: Dynon roll servo settings?
Date: Sep 23, 2011
Rob; I saw this in the manual. You may have already done this. Compass Calibration Requirement: The SkyView autopilot requires an accurate magnetic heading to operate efficiently and comfortably in heading mode and the radio-based VOR/NAV mode. Therefore it is critical that the ADAHRS be installed correctly, calibrated, and operating well in all attitudes. I know you mentioned NAV worked so this may not be an issue, but hopefully it may help.. From: Rob Kochman Sent: Friday, September 23, 2011 2:13 PM Subject: RV10-List: Dynon roll servo settings? Anyone have a good set of Dynon roll servo settings for the RV-10? I feel like I've tried everything, and still am not happy with the result. Nav mode is rock solid, but heading mode wanders all over the place. Thanks... -Rob -- Rob Kochman RV-10 Flying since March 2011 Woodinville, WA http://kochman.net/N819K ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Dynon Pitch Servo Mounting kit for sale.
From: Michael Kraus <n223rv(at)wolflakeairport.net>
Date: Sep 23, 2011
I have a standard servo for roll, and the higher torque one for pitch. Heading mode has always been spot on. In smooth air pitch is fine. On bumpy days it seems to oscillate a bit. I haven't started tweaking the settings much, but will soon. Overall I'm happy with the performance and I'm sure the pitch can be fixed with the settings adjustments.... -Mike Kraus Sent from my iPhone On Sep 23, 2011, at 6:31 PM, "Ron B." wrote: > > How is your Skyview AP working for you in the RV-10 with the standard servo? We are not able to use our AP at all, we had somewhat results with the SV-42 servos and tried upgrading to the SV-52 but the system is not usable (for us) with the SV-52 servos. Don't know why and we were told to hold tight until they released the linear actuated servos. Glad to hear your's is working properly. > Ron > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=353069#353069 > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Tire in Atlanta?
From: "johngoodman" <johngoodman(at)earthlink.net>
Date: Sep 24, 2011
Jesse, I live 4 miles from Aircraft Spruce in Peachtree City. They are open on Saturday until 1600. Give me a call at 7704879648 when you wake up Saturday morning. John Goodman -------- #40572 First flight was on 25 June, 2011 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=353097#353097 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: antenna locations
From: "johngoodman" <johngoodman(at)earthlink.net>
Date: Sep 24, 2011
Rob, Have you considered moving the Marker Beacon antenna? I imagine it can go almost anywhere. John -------- #40572 First flight was on 25 June, 2011 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=353099#353099 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Tire in Atlanta?
From: Jesse Saint <jesse(at)saintaviation.com>
Date: Sep 24, 2011
Thanks for the offers to help. I got a used tire on the field to get me home. Great community to be a part of. Jesse Saint I-TEC, Inc. jesse(at)itecusa.org www.itecusa.org www.mavericklsa.com C: 352-427-0285 O: 352-465-4545 F: 815-377-3694 Sent from my iPhone On Sep 24, 2011, at 7:20 AM, "johngoodman" wrote: > > Jesse, > I live 4 miles from Aircraft Spruce in Peachtree City. They are open on Saturday until 1600. Give me a call at 7704879648 when you wake up Saturday morning. > > John Goodman > > -------- > #40572 First flight was on 25 June, 2011 > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=353097#353097 > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: G3X Component Locations
From: "nukeflyboy" <flymoore(at)charter.net>
Date: Sep 24, 2011
OK you G3X'ers out there - where are you putting the "stuff". After reading the 4197 page instruction manual it appears that the best place for the magnetometer is in the wing tip, and the AHRS near the firewall. The reason for the wing tip is to get it away from all the big wires and motors (eg., trim) and magnetic stuff. The reason for mounting the ARHS forward is that it also has the engine monitor integral to it and the sensor probes have to connect to it. Maybe on top of the tunnel? What have y'all been doing? I just got my GTX-23 yesterday and it appears that the best place for this transponder is behind the baggage compartment bulkhead, above the batteries, where I had originally planned to put the AHRS. -------- Dave Moore RV-6 flying RV-10 QB - Need to start panel Rest almost done Breathing too much fiberglass dust Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=353128#353128 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Stein Bruch" <stein(at)steinair.com>
Subject: G3X Component Locations
Date: Sep 24, 2011
Hi Dave, The GMU is best placed either in the fuselage on the bulkhead behind the baggage compartment wall or on the wingtip. We have a custom made mount for either location so give us a call and we can get one on the way to you. The Fuse location is nice and handy, but won't work so well if you have an air conditioner in that same bay...otherwise we have dozens flying with the unit in that location with no problems. The wingtip is nice as well, but only if there is no strobe power supply or wingtip fuel tank. You are correct that the AHRS is best mounted either between the panel and sub panel, or between the firewall and sub panel directly in front of the screens so you can easily work on it without crawling around on your back. The GTX can go in the back or in the front, no problem either way. My 2 cents as usual! Cheers, Stein Bruch SteinAir, Inc. 651-460-6955 stein(at)steinair.com -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of nukeflyboy Sent: Saturday, September 24, 2011 3:44 PM Subject: RV10-List: G3X Component Locations OK you G3X'ers out there - where are you putting the "stuff". After reading the 4197 page instruction manual it appears that the best place for the magnetometer is in the wing tip, and the AHRS near the firewall. The reason for the wing tip is to get it away from all the big wires and motors (eg., trim) and magnetic stuff. The reason for mounting the ARHS forward is that it also has the engine monitor integral to it and the sensor probes have to connect to it. Maybe on top of the tunnel? What have y'all been doing? I just got my GTX-23 yesterday and it appears that the best place for this transponder is behind the baggage compartment bulkhead, above the batteries, where I had originally planned to put the AHRS. -------- Dave Moore RV-6 flying RV-10 QB - Need to start panel Rest almost done Breathing too much fiberglass dust Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=353128#353128 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "DLM" <dlm34077(at)q.com>
Subject: FW: Fly RV-10
Date: Sep 24, 2011
A friend who sometimes flies my 10 got a new license plate. _____ From: Tom Hodgdon [mailto:thodgdon(at)AMSAFE.com] Sent: Saturday, September 24, 2011 1:47 PM Subject: Fly RV-10 My new license plate came today. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Chris Hukill" <cjhukill(at)cox.net>
Subject: antenna locations
Date: Sep 25, 2011
The MB and ADF may not be obsolete as soon as GPS if Obama's sponsor Lightsquare gets their way! ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: G3X Component Locations
From: "bill.peyton" <peyton.b(at)sbcglobal.net>
Date: Sep 25, 2011
I have located the GMU using the bracket Stein provides, on the 2nd bulkhead back from the baggage, the one where the static port is close to. This puts it far enough away from the battery and the elev trim servo. There are lots flying this way with no issues. My GSU is mounted on a stiff tray I fabricated from .062 that spans the instrument panel to the subpanel on the right as close to the right side as possible. It is extremely stiff at that location. The pitot static will go through the sub-panel using 90 deg. elbows. I would not mount it on the tunnel or close to the firewall due to possible heat issues and acess. Bill -------- Bill Peyton Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=353156#353156 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/img_1952_413.jpg ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: G3X Component Locations
From: "bill.peyton" <peyton.b(at)sbcglobal.net>
Date: Sep 25, 2011
Another photo showing the locations of the remaining items -------- Bill Peyton Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=353157#353157 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/img_1963_522.jpg ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 25, 2011
Subject: Re: antenna locations
From: Kelly McMullen <apilot2(at)gmail.com>
If the FCC continues its boneheaded ways, they will have to turn Loran back on. However, Lightsquared's approvals date back before the current administration. The FCC is allegedly an independent commission, so politics role is so far speculative, and not worthy of discussion here. If one discusses politics, all building stops, and there will be no more RV grins..........so go bang some rivets and shed any frustrations with making the next most perfect airplane. ;-) On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 6:46 AM, Chris Hukill wrote: > The MB and ADF may not be obsolete as soon as GPS if Obamas sponsor > Lightsquare gets their way! > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: G3X Component Locations
From: "TBL" <andy(at)klamflex.com>
Date: Sep 25, 2011
Hi Bill, Would you mind giving me your reasons for deciding on a 3 screen system? And Lawrence -------- 2nd time offender Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=353177#353177 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: G3X Component Locations
From: "nukeflyboy" <flymoore(at)charter.net>
Date: Sep 25, 2011
Stein and Bill - thanks for the info and photos. I'll put the magnetometer in the aft fuselage area as Stein suggests. It helps to know that it works well there. I like Bill's AHRS mounting and will do something similar. I am also installing a 3 screen system. My reasons are to have two in front of the pilot (one to aviate, one to navigate/WX/ etc.) and one in front of the co-pilot so it can be flown from the right seat. An unrelated factor was that the price reduction on the G3X allowed me to get 3 screens for a lot less $ than a 2 screen GRT or AFS. -------- Dave Moore RV-6 flying RV-10 QB - Need to start panel Rest almost done Breathing too much fiberglass dust Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=353190#353190 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: G3X Component Locations
From: "nukeflyboy" <flymoore(at)charter.net>
Date: Sep 26, 2011
Jim, This is a little off topic so I will give a couple quick answers and then give a more detailed response in a new thread later. Yes - it is a complete system including engine monitor and sensors. It has synthetic vision, HWITS display, geo-referenced charts, approach plates, and airport diagrams. With the GX Pilot it can do a complete coupled approach. The functionality is about the same (as far as I can tell) as the GRT and AFS high end systems except it has built in geo-referenced plates and airport diagrams which the others do not. The screens are a bit smaller but fit very nicely on a standard 10 panel. I had the same question about subscriptions. I have been told that for the G3X, the Jepp subscription that you need for the GTN-650/750 will work to update the G3X map at no extra charge. Garmin now allows builders to make their own harnesses. As I recall, the 3 screen G3X came in about $2500 less than the GRT/AFS equivalents. -------- Dave Moore RV-6 flying RV-10 QB - Need to start panel Rest almost done Breathing too much fiberglass dust Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=353229#353229 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: John Gonzalez <indigoonlatigo(at)msn.com>
Subject: nose wheel tow bar recommendations
Date: Sep 26, 2011
Can anyone give me a brand and location to purchase a tow bar for the 10 wh ich works well with the nose faring? Thanks John ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Fuel sender
From: "Eric_Kallio" <scout019(at)msn.com>
Date: Sep 26, 2011
When flying through some bumps the other day I lost my fuel quantity indications on the left tank. Didn't actually lose them, the indicated quantity went from 24 gallons to -12. After de-fuel it seems the float is still attached and moving free, but the resistance from the sending wire to ground is a consistent 176 ohms. It seems to me that there is a failure of the sending unit. Before I pull this apart and order a replacement has anyone seen this before, or have a step that I may have missed to troubleshoot the problem. Eric Kallio N518RV... Flying Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=353267#353267 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: nose wheel tow bar recommendations
From: Michael Kraus <n223rv(at)wolflakeairport.net>
Date: Sep 26, 2011
Search for Bogart tow bars, they make one specifically for the RV-10 and it w orks great for me. http://www.aircraftspruce.com/catalog/pspages/bogibars2.php -Mike Kraus RV-10 flying Sent from my iPhone On Sep 26, 2011, at 3:32 PM, John Gonzalez wrote: > Can anyone give me a brand and location to purchase a tow bar for the 10 w hich works well with the nose faring? > > Thanks > > John > > ========================== ========= ========================== ========= ========================== ========= ========================== ========= > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Carl Froehlich <carl.froehlich(at)verizon.net>
Subject: Re: Fuel sender
Date: Sep 26, 2011
First check the ground connection. If you do not run a separate ground wire to a ring connector under one of the screw heads, you may want to. If the ground is good, you may have a bad sender. Considering you have some reading other than short or open I'd guess it is hung up on something. Not sure how you can know that it moving freely with the tank on the plane. Either way you need to pull the unit. One other point, if you measured the sending unit resistance to ground in circuit (sending wire still attached to whatever it goes to), you may have a false reading. Remove the sending wire from the sender and measure again. Carl On Sep 26, 2011, at 4:12 PM, "Eric_Kallio" wrote: > > When flying through some bumps the other day I lost my fuel quantity indications on the left tank. Didn't actually lose them, the indicated quantity went from 24 gallons to -12. After de-fuel it seems the float is still attached and moving free, but the resistance from the sending wire to ground is a consistent 176 ohms. It seems to me that there is a failure of the sending unit. Before I pull this apart and order a replacement has anyone seen this before, or have a step that I may have missed to troubleshoot the problem. > > Eric Kallio > N518RV... Flying > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=353267#353267 > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: David <dmaib(at)mac.com>
Subject: Re: Fuel sender
Date: Sep 26, 2011
I will second the suggestion to make darn sure it is well grounded. I replaced my right hand sender last year unnecessarily. I thought I had a good ground, but I did not. Oh well, now I have a spare sender if the RH ever really fails. David Maib 40559 Flying On Sep 26, 2011, at 4:12 PM, Eric_Kallio wrote: > > When flying through some bumps the other day I lost my fuel > quantity indications on the left tank. Didn't actually lose them, > the indicated quantity went from 24 gallons to -12. After de-fuel > it seems the float is still attached and moving free, but the > resistance from the sending wire to ground is a consistent 176 > ohms. It seems to me that there is a failure of the sending unit. > Before I pull this apart and order a replacement has anyone seen > this before, or have a step that I may have missed to troubleshoot > the problem. > > Eric Kallio > N518RV... Flying > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=353267#353267 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 26, 2011
Subject: Re: Dynon roll servo settings?
From: Rob Kochman <rv10rob(at)gmail.com>
Thanks, guys... I'm using the legacy (D100) system. I did do all the calibration steps for the compass. My magnetometer is mounted on a shelf aft of the baggage bulkhead. http://kochman.net/N819K/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/img_0853.jpg Though I used nonferrous mounting hardware, the real seat belt cables pass a few inches by. Do you think that would be a problem? My understading is that this was a common mounting location. Mike, it's weird we're having different problems. My pitch has been rock solid from day 1. -Rob On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 4:40 PM, Pascal wrote: > Rob; > I saw this in the manual. You may have already done this. > Compass Calibration Requirement: > The SkyView autopilot requires an accurate magnetic heading to operate > efficiently and comfortably in heading mode and the radio-based VOR/NAV > mode. Therefore it is critical that the ADAHRS be installed correctly, > calibrated, and operating well in all attitudes. > > I know you mentioned NAV worked so this may not be an issue, but hopefully > it may help.. > > > *From:* Rob Kochman > *Sent:* Friday, September 23, 2011 2:13 PM > *To:* rv10-list > *Subject:* RV10-List: Dynon roll servo settings? > > Anyone have a good set of Dynon roll servo settings for the RV-10? I > feel like I've tried everything, and still am not happy with the result. > Nav mode is rock solid, but heading mode wanders all over the place. > > Thanks... > > -Rob > > -- > Rob Kochman > RV-10 Flying since March 2011 > Woodinville, WA > http://kochman.net/N819K > > * > > href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List > href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com > href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/c* > > * > > > = > * > > -- Rob Kochman RV-10 Flying since March 2011 Woodinville, WA http://kochman.net/N819K ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: FW: [LML] Chelton..and more...
Date: Sep 27, 2011
From: "John Cox" <johnwcox(at)pacificnw.com>
Tim and other Chelton aficionados'. Here is a Conversion to Garmin instrumentation which might create a benefit to someone building an RV-10 and holding interest in Chelton equipment in their panel. Contact Ronald at "ronald(at)sdc.com" John 40600 -----Original Message----- From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml(at)lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Ronald STEVENS Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2011 3:23 AM Subject: [LML] Chelton......and more... Hello guys Well you perhaps did see the picture of my new panel, and it really looks good, but after flying with it hard IFR I have to admit that my currency on the Garmins is better than this from the Cheltons. Also to new Garmin GTN750 does not talk to the Chelton (in other words, you can put a flight plan in both systems and can switch between the 2 systems for your autopilot). So I am thinking of selling my Chelton (3 screen system, including the WSI module) and getting either the Garmin G500 or a couple of Garmin G3X screens. Now I asked an avionics shop what my chelton would cost, and he told me that this is at least 60k. But I know I will not get 60k back for it right now, but if someone is interested than make me an offer I cannot refuse and I will get the Chelton out of my plane and start working on my panel again lol == Ronald >65 hours and counting ps Stuff I really like about the chelton is the VFR approach, also the HITS is pretty good, the engine monitor is very clean and clear. -- For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 27, 2011
From: Bill Watson <Mauledriver(at)nc.rr.com>
Subject: Re: nose wheel tow bar recommendations
Yep, the Bogert bar. One thing I'm looking for now is a rudder lock. Someone has pics of a "Bogert-like tow bar" doubling as rudder lock that looks like it might be great. However, I tried to see if the actual Bogie bar can be made to fit - and not luck. Can someone elaborate on the tow bar as rudder lock solution? Was it a Bogie bar? What brand was it. Bill "learning lean to climb and LOP - very good stuff" Watson On 9/26/2011 3:32 PM, John Gonzalez wrote: > Can anyone give me a brand and location to purchase a tow bar for the > 10 which works well with the nose faring? ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Rene Felker" <rene(at)felker.com>
Subject: nose wheel tow bar recommendations
Date: Sep 27, 2011
I had two rudder lock failures...bummer. My third one is just PVC Looks like this.. | | | | | __ | | _|_ | | | | Rene' Felker N423CF 801-721-6080 From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Bill Watson Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2011 1:23 PM Subject: Re: RV10-List: nose wheel tow bar recommendations Yep, the Bogert bar. One thing I'm looking for now is a rudder lock. Someone has pics of a "Bogert-like tow bar" doubling as rudder lock that looks like it might be great. However, I tried to see if the actual Bogie bar can be made to fit - and not luck. Can someone elaborate on the tow bar as rudder lock solution? Was it a Bogie bar? What brand was it. Bill "learning lean to climb and LOP - very good stuff" Watson On 9/26/2011 3:32 PM, John Gonzalez wrote: Can anyone give me a brand and location to purchase a tow bar for the 10 which works well with the nose faring? ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Gary Specketer" <speckter(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: nose wheel tow bar recommendations
Date: Sep 27, 2011
I used the Bogert tow bar and added a couple of carriage bolts on the bottom end to fit in the holes in the rudder peddles. I slide the seat forward onto the tow bar top T and tie the seat belt around the stick and the tow bar for a secure set up. Unfortunately I do not have pictures, but the key is to not allow the tow bar to fall off of the rudder peddles and the large head of the carriage bolts keeps it in place and also puts mild pressure on the brakes to hold the plane steady in a blow. It is simple, you always have it with you and there is no extra weight to carry around. Gary Specketer From: Bill Watson Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2011 3:22 PM Subject: Re: RV10-List: nose wheel tow bar recommendations Yep, the Bogert bar. One thing I'm looking for now is a rudder lock. Someone has pics of a "Bogert-like tow bar" doubling as rudder lock that looks like it might be great. However, I tried to see if the actual Bogie bar can be made to fit - and not luck. Can someone elaborate on the tow bar as rudder lock solution? Was it a Bogie bar? What brand was it. Bill "learning lean to climb and LOP - very good stuff" Watson On 9/26/2011 3:32 PM, John Gonzalez wrote: Can anyone give me a brand and location to purchase a tow bar for the 10 which works well with the nose faring? ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Albert Gardner" <ibspud(at)roadrunner.com>
Subject: Rudder Lock
Date: Sep 27, 2011
The cheap but effective way is to tie the stick back with the seat belts and then use a piece of cord to hold the rudder. Albert Gardner N991RV Yuma, AZ From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Bill Watson One thing I'm looking for now is a rudder lock. Someone has pics of a "Bogert-like tow bar" doubling as rudder lock that looks like it might be great. However, I tried to see if the actual Bogie bar can be made to fit - and not luck. Can someone elaborate on the tow bar as rudder lock solution? Was it a Bogie bar? What brand was it. Bill "learning lean to climb and LOP - very good stuff" Watson ________________________________________________________________________________
From: David <dmaib(at)mac.com>
Subject: Re: Rudder Lock
Date: Sep 27, 2011
My solution is the same as Alberts. I also install an aileron lock on one or both of the ailerons, and use the interior control lock that Alex DeDominices used to sell on his ATP Products site. I am not sure where you get them now. It is a rod with a spring that fits against the pedals and the seat base, and has a velcro strap to hold the stick. Sorry I don't have a link to it any more. It is marginal by itself, but with the other systems I am using, I seem to have a pretty good system for locking the controls. David Maib 40559 Flying On Sep 27, 2011, at 8:46 PM, Albert Gardner wrote: > The cheap but effective way is to tie the stick back with the seat > belts and then use a piece of cord to hold the rudder. > > Albert Gardner > > N991RV > > Yuma, AZ > > > From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list- > server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Bill Watson > One thing I'm looking for now is a rudder lock. Someone has pics > of a "Bogert-like tow bar" doubling as rudder lock that looks like > it might be great. However, I tried to see if the actual Bogie bar > can be made to fit - and not luck. > Can someone elaborate on the tow bar as rudder lock solution? Was > it a Bogie bar? What brand was it. > Bill "learning lean to climb and LOP - very good stuff" Watson > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Robin Marks <robin(at)PaintTheWeb.com>
Date: Sep 27, 2011
Subject: Rudder Lock
I still like my system. Seatbelt on the stick and a simple rudder lock that is ultra small & weighs nearly nothing. (Red painted one is from my 8A) Robin *From:* owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] *On Behalf Of *David *Sent:* Tuesday, September 27, 2011 6:48 PM *To:* rv10-list(at)matronics.com *Subject:* Re: RV10-List: Rudder Lock My solution is the same as Alberts. I also install an aileron lock<http://www.aircraftspruce.com/catalog/pspages/padlock.php> on one or both of the ailerons, and use the interior control lock that Alex DeDominices used to sell on his ATP Products site. I am not sure where you get them now. It is a rod with a spring that fits against the pedals and the seat base, and has a velcro strap to hold the stick. Sorry I don't have a link to it any more. It is marginal by itself, but with the other systems I am using, I seem to have a pretty good system for locking the controls. David Maib 40559 Flying On Sep 27, 2011, at 8:46 PM, Albert Gardner wrote: The cheap but effective way is to tie the stick back with the seat belts and then use a piece of cord to hold the rudder. Albert Gardner N991RV Yuma, AZ *From:* owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [ mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] *On Behalf Of *Bill Watson One thing I'm looking for now is a rudder lock. Someone has pics of a "Bogert-like tow bar" doubling as rudder lock that looks like it might be great. However, I tried to see if the actual Bogie bar can be made to fit - and not luck. Can someone elaborate on the tow bar as rudder lock solution? Was it a Bogie bar? What brand was it. Bill "learning lean to climb and LOP - very good stuff" Watson * * ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Dave Saylor <dave.saylor.aircrafters(at)gmail.com>
Date: Sep 27, 2011
Subject: Re: nose wheel tow bar recommendations
Bill, I had a couple tabs welded onto my Bogie Bar so they fit between the rudder pedal and the tube. That locks the bar in place. Just had to make sure the tabs are positioned so they don't interfere with the nose fairing. Pictures are in the archive. Then I added a bungee on one of the pivot bolts. The stick rests in the V of the lever handle, and the bungee wraps around the stick to secure the ailerons. Then clamp the whole thing down with the seat belt. See pics in the archives from 10 June 2010. Dave Saylor AirCrafters 140 Aviation Way Watsonville, CA 95076 831-722-9141 Shop 831-750-0284 Cell On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 12:22 PM, Bill Watson wrote: > Yep, the Bogert bar. > > One thing I'm looking for now is a rudder lock. Someone has pics of a > "Bogert-like tow bar" doubling as rudder lock that looks like it might be > great. However, I tried to see if the actual Bogie bar can be made to fit - > and not luck. > > Can someone elaborate on the tow bar as rudder lock solution? Was it a > Bogie bar? What brand was it. > > Bill "learning lean to climb and LOP - very good stuff" Watson > > > On 9/26/2011 3:32 PM, John Gonzalez wrote: > > Can anyone give me a brand and location to purchase a tow bar for the 10 > which works well with the nose faring? > > > * > > > = > * > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Albert Gardner" <ibspud(at)roadrunner.com>
Subject: Rudder Lock
Date: Sep 27, 2011
Well, yours looks a lot more elegant but they always feel sorry for me and give me a discount on fuel. Albert From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Robin Marks Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2011 7:41 PM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Rudder Lock I still like my system. Seatbelt on the stick and a simple rudder lock that is ultra small & weighs nearly nothing. (Red painted one is from my 8A) Robin From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of David Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2011 6:48 PM Subject: Re: RV10-List: Rudder Lock My solution is the same as Alberts. I also install an aileron lock <http://www.aircraftspruce.com/catalog/pspages/padlock.php> on one or both of the ailerons, and use the interior control lock that Alex DeDominices used to sell on his ATP Products site. I am not sure where you get them now. It is a rod with a spring that fits against the pedals and the seat base, and has a velcro strap to hold the stick. Sorry I don't have a link to it any more. It is marginal by itself, but with the other systems I am using, I seem to have a pretty good system for locking the controls. David Maib 40559 Flying On Sep 27, 2011, at 8:46 PM, Albert Gardner wrote: The cheap but effective way is to tie the stick back with the seat belts and then use a piece of cord to hold the rudder. Albert Gardner N991RV Yuma, AZ From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Bill Watson One thing I'm looking for now is a rudder lock. Someone has pics of a "Bogert-like tow bar" doubling as rudder lock that looks like it might be great. However, I tried to see if the actual Bogie bar can be made to fit - and not luck. Can someone elaborate on the tow bar as rudder lock solution? Was it a Bogie bar? What brand was it. Bill "learning lean to climb and LOP - very good stuff" Watson ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Jesse Saint <jesse(at)saintaviation.com>
Subject: Re: Rudder Lock
Date: Sep 28, 2011
I have used the Bogie Bar with tubes welded on to extend the arms at the end where it grabs the nose wheel. Those tubes fit in the holes on the rudder pedals and then the handle of the bar goes against the seat back with a seat belt holding it down. Then you use the other seatbelt to hold the stick back if you want to lock elevator and ailerons. I have looked at most of the different things that people have used and have tested some of them. There is nothing that I think comes close to as strong as this, especially in heavy winds. I know one plane that had to replace the rudder because he used the spring-loaded gust lock that holds the pedals. It broke in heavy wind and the rudder was damaged beyond repair. Another benefit is that you can not possibly get in the plane and take off without removing it, because it is in the front seat. It also weighs almost nothing in addition to your tow bar, assuming that you are taking your tow bar with you when you travel. Jesse Saint Saint Aviation, Inc. jesse(at)saintaviation.com C: 352-427-0285 F: 815-377-3694 On Sep 28, 2011, at 12:19 AM, Albert Gardner wrote: > Well, yours looks a lot more elegant but they always feel sorry for me and give me a discount on fuel. > Albert > > From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Robin Marks > Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2011 7:41 PM > To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: RE: RV10-List: Rudder Lock > > I still like my system. Seatbelt on the stick and a simple rudder lock that is ultra small & weighs nearly nothing. > (Red painted one is from my 8A) > Robin > > From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of David > Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2011 6:48 PM > To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: Re: RV10-List: Rudder Lock > > My solution is the same as Alberts. I also install an aileron lock on one or both of the ailerons, and use the interior control lock that Alex DeDominices used to sell on his ATP Products site. I am not sure where you get them now. It is a rod with a spring that fits against the pedals and the seat base, and has a velcro strap to hold the stick. Sorry I don't have a link to it any more. It is marginal by itself, but with the other systems I am using, I seem to have a pretty good system for locking the controls. > > David Maib > 40559 > Flying > > On Sep 27, 2011, at 8:46 PM, Albert Gardner wrote: > > > The cheap but effective way is to tie the stick back with the seat belts and then use a piece of cord to hold the rudder. > Albert Gardner > N991RV > Yuma, AZ > > From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Bill Watson > One thing I'm looking for now is a rudder lock. Someone has pics of a "Bogert-like tow bar" doubling as rudder lock that looks like it might be great. However, I tried to see if the actual Bogie bar can be made to fit - and not luck. > Can someone elaborate on the tow bar as rudder lock solution? Was it a Bogie bar? What brand was it. > Bill "learning lean to climb and LOP - very good stuff" Watson > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: RV-10 down in Marieeta, OH
From: "rleffler" <rv(at)thelefflers.com>
Date: Sep 28, 2011
I just saw this news posting: http://www.10tv.com/content/stories/2011/09/28/marietta-plane-crash-2-with-injuries.html Two people were treated at The Ohio State University Medical Center on Wednesday morning after their homemade plane crashed. The plane crashed shortly after 7 p.m. on Tuesday about 200 yards from state Route 7, 10TV's Shayla Reaves reported. Police said that the pilot was Nicholas Austin, 24, of Frederiskburg, Texas and the co-pilot was Richard Gray, 54, of Vincent, Ohio. Officials said their RV-10 aircraft had just taken off from the Wood County Airport in West Virginia for a test flight when it crashed. The two men were being treated for serious injuries. -------- Bob Leffler N410BL - FWF RV-10 #40684 http://mykitlog.com/rleffler Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=353406#353406 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Door photos
From: "jayb" <jaybrinkmeyer(at)yahoo.com>
Date: Sep 28, 2011
I've been meaning to post a couple photos of my doors. They turned out pretty nice... Abby at Flightline Interiors provided the fabric and trim strips. Cheers, Jay Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=353410#353410 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/hpim0879_697.jpg http://forums.matronics.com//files/img_20110910_115316_172.jpg ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 28, 2011
From: Bill Watson <Mauledriver(at)nc.rr.com>
Subject: Re: nose wheel tow bar recommendations
Thanks Dave, I actually saw that and tried to figure out how the bar was made to fit in there. Couldn't quite do it and assumed it was a non-Bogie Bar. I'll have to take a closer look and try again. I understand the tab thing. Had some trouble with fitting my stick tops thru the V... more evaluation required. Bill "loving the flying part" Watson On 9/27/2011 11:55 PM, Dave Saylor wrote: > Bill, > > I had a couple tabs welded onto my Bogie Bar so they fit between the > rudder pedal and the tube. That locks the bar in place. Just had to > make sure the tabs are positioned so they don't interfere with the > nose fairing. Pictures are in the archive. > > Then I added a bungee on one of the pivot bolts. The stick rests in > the V of the lever handle, and the bungee wraps around the stick to > secure the ailerons. > > Then clamp the whole thing down with the seat belt. See pics in the > archives from 10 June 2010. > > Dave Saylor > AirCrafters > 140 Aviation Way > Watsonville, CA 95076 > 831-722-9141 Shop > 831-750-0284 Cell ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "DLM" <dlm34077(at)q.com>
Subject: RV-10 down in Marieeta, OH
Date: Sep 28, 2011
The FAA accident stats indicate the number was 499RV and serial 40373. Registration shows date of 8/15/2011; and Ronald Owen of Sebring FL as manufacturer which does not match either person or location on board. Will be interesting to see who built it, when phase I was completed and what engine it had in as it is not specified in the FAA online records. -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of rleffler Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2011 5:28 AM Subject: RV10-List: RV-10 down in Marieeta, OH I just saw this news posting: http://www.10tv.com/content/stories/2011/09/28/marietta-plane-crash-2-with-i njuries.html Two people were treated at The Ohio State University Medical Center on Wednesday morning after their homemade plane crashed. The plane crashed shortly after 7 p.m. on Tuesday about 200 yards from state Route 7, 10TV's Shayla Reaves reported. Police said that the pilot was Nicholas Austin, 24, of Frederiskburg, Texas and the co-pilot was Richard Gray, 54, of Vincent, Ohio. Officials said their RV-10 aircraft had just taken off from the Wood County Airport in West Virginia for a test flight when it crashed. The two men were being treated for serious injuries. -------- Bob Leffler N410BL - FWF RV-10 #40684 http://mykitlog.com/rleffler Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=353406#353406 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 28, 2011
From: Bill Watson <Mauledriver(at)nc.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Door photos
Nicely done Jay! I'm curious about the decision to stay clear of the door edge. In my case, after carefully fitting the doors without the trim, adding the trim changed the fit just enough to put everything out of kilter. I'm still trying to straighten it all out. Good idea to stay clear but it must complicate the task of gluing it all down and maintaining an even outer margin. Is this a new Flightline option? BTW, I'm very happy with my Flightline interior. The fit was fantastic and it continues to evolve with enhancements. Though I did zero sound insulation, the amount of sound reduction from the carpet and fabric is amazing. And my rear tail panel is still uncovered... may just paint it. Very satisfied! Bill On 9/28/2011 10:18 AM, jayb wrote: > --> RV10-List message posted by: "jayb" > > I've been meaning to post a couple photos of my doors. They turned out pretty nice... Abby at Flightline Interiors provided the fabric and trim strips. > > Cheers, > Jay > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 28, 2011
Subject: Re: RV-10 down in Marieeta, OH
From: John Cox <rv10pro(at)gmail.com>
Link did not work but Thanks. John 40600 On Sep 28, 2011 5:34 AM, "rleffler" wrote: > > I just saw this news posting: > > http://www.10tv.com/content/stories/2011/09/28/marietta-plane-crash-2-with-injuries.html > > Two people were treated at The Ohio State University Medical Center on Wednesday morning after their homemade plane crashed. > > The plane crashed shortly after 7 p.m. on Tuesday about 200 yards from state Route 7, 10TV's Shayla Reaves reported. > > Police said that the pilot was Nicholas Austin, 24, of Frederiskburg, Texas and the co-pilot was Richard Gray, 54, of Vincent, Ohio. > > Officials said their RV-10 aircraft had just taken off from the Wood County Airport in West Virginia for a test flight when it crashed. > > The two men were being treated for serious injuries. > > -------- > Bob Leffler > N410BL - FWF > RV-10 #40684 > http://mykitlog.com/rleffler > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=353406#353406 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Door photos
From: "jayb" <jaybrinkmeyer(at)yahoo.com>
Date: Sep 28, 2011
One additional photo is attached. Nope. Not a standard Flightline option. The edge was actually pretty easy. From the photo you can see where I drew a line around the inside edge of the closed door. Then glued the fabric close the the edge. Finally, finished up with a trim strip. The edge trim provided the special sauce as it dressed up the ragged cut line. If you go that route, the trim is the same as for the windows... except there's no hard inner plastic piece. You should also note that the photo shows half vinyl, half fabric. That was a non-starter as the vinyl kept popping out of the glue no matter what I did. Very frustrating. In finally just cut it out and added an extra piece of fabric and hid the edge with another trim strip. Making the AL access panels was a custom job by me after a failed attempt at making them out of glass. The AL ones look better by far. Abby was helpful and patient while I worked my way through door design iterations and questions. She also made several custom access covers to match. Cheers, Jay Mauledriver(at)nc.rr.com wrote: > Nicely done Jay! > > I'm curious about the decision to stay clear of the door edge. In my > case, after carefully fitting the doors without the trim, adding the > trim changed the fit just enough to put everything out of kilter. I'm > still trying to straighten it all out. > > Good idea to stay clear but it must complicate the task of gluing it all > down and maintaining an even outer margin. > > Is this a new Flightline option? > > BTW, I'm very happy with my Flightline interior. The fit was fantastic > and it continues to evolve with enhancements. Though I did zero sound > insulation, the amount of sound reduction from the carpet and fabric is > amazing. And my rear tail panel is still uncovered... may just paint > it. Very satisfied! > > Bill > > On 9/28/2011 10:18 AM, jayb wrote: > > > > > > > I've been meaning to post a couple photos of my doors. They turned out pretty nice... Abby at Flightline Interiors provided the fabric and trim strips. > > > > Cheers, > > Jay > > > > > > > > > > > Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=353443#353443 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/hpim0851_393.jpg ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: RV-10 down in Marieeta, OH
From: Ron Walker <n520tx(at)gmail.com>
Date: Sep 28, 2011
> Sounds like Rick Gray runs a builder assist center and was flying with > a customer prior to delivery of a new plane. Yes - he's built plenty of RV's, plenty of them award winners. His web site-> http://rv6rick.tripod.com/ohiovalleyrvators/id22.html ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 28, 2011
Subject: Re: RV-10 down in Marieeta, OH
From: Phillip Perry <philperry9(at)gmail.com>
His F1 was profiled in an EAA video a while back. Here's the link. http://bcove.me/bphx4b0k On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 1:09 PM, Ron Walker wrote: > > > Sounds like Rick Gray runs a builder assist center and was flying with > > a customer prior to delivery of a new plane. > > Yes - he's built plenty of RV's, plenty of them award winners. His web > site-> http://rv6rick.tripod.com/ohiovalleyrvators/id22.html > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: G3X Component Locations
From: "bill.peyton" <peyton.b(at)sbcglobal.net>
Date: Sep 29, 2011
The reason I went with the 3 screen system is that both my wife and I are pilots, we use our current plane for lot's of long cross country flights. We intend to do the same with the -10. It seems like the person on the right always ends up flying for a while on long legs, so the 3rd display will take care of that. Also, our plan is to usually have the non-flying pilot take care of the radios, talking to center, looking at weather and navigating. The third display will make this a lot easier. The final reason is that my father, and building partner, just turned 87. He continues to fly and pass his medical and BFR every year. The only issue is insurance. We have been told we will not be able to get any for him without me or an instructor in the right seat. Those are the reasons for my choice of a 3 display system. While the size of the displays are not as large as the AFS or Dynon, they fit very nicely in the panel. I attached my cad image with JPG files overlaid on the panel. Bill -------- Bill Peyton Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=353512#353512 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/complete_panel_699.bmp ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Gary Specketer" <speckter(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: G3X Component Locations
Date: Sep 29, 2011
Good for your Dad, we should all be so lucky to be flying into our late 80's. Gary Specketer -------------------------------------------------- From: "bill.peyton" <peyton.b(at)sbcglobal.net> Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2011 9:29 AM Subject: RV10-List: Re: G3X Component Locations > > The reason I went with the 3 screen system is that both my wife and I are > pilots, we use our current plane for lot's of long cross country flights. > We intend to do the same with the -10. It seems like the person on the > right always ends up flying for a while on long legs, so the 3rd display > will take care of that. Also, our plan is to usually have the non-flying > pilot take care of the radios, talking to center, looking at weather and > navigating. The third display will make this a lot easier. The final > reason is that my father, and building partner, just turned 87. He > continues to fly and pass his medical and BFR every year. The only issue > is insurance. We have been told we will not be able to get any for him > without me or an instructor in the right seat. Those are the reasons for > my choice of a 3 display system. > While the size of the displays are not as large as the AFS or Dynon, they > fit very nicely in the panel. I attached my cad image with JPG files > overlaid on the panel. > Bill > > -------- > Bill Peyton > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=353512#353512 > > > Attachments: > > http://forums.matronics.com//files/complete_panel_699.bmp > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Pascal" <rv10flyer(at)verizon.net>
Subject: user fee petition
Date: Sep 29, 2011
I received a e-mail from Fuller, at AOPA asking that I complete a Petitiion. I know the Socal RV list has also been creating an account and signing this. I would encourage we continue to hound our representatives in Congress and Senate. Sadly I am in California, however my congressman did respond and said he would fight to not allow user fees to the aviation community. If no one has seen this (US based) http://www.aopa.org/advocacy/articles/2011/110926-grass-roots-petition-la unched-to-kill-user-fee-threat.html?WT.mc_id=ebrief We don=99t want to be where the rest of the world is with user fees. If you care write the representative, as we have done before and let them know your feelings. Sign the petition too. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Robin Marks <Robin(at)PaintTheWeb.com>
Date: Sep 29, 2011
Subject: Re: G3X Component Locations
I agree completely with Bill on his points. One thing not mentioned is the cost of these systems is not in the screens so adding a third screen is ~$3,500. All that being said there are a few gotchya's on the G3X and the 430/530. The 430 takes over responsibility when on so an flight plan best entered into the G3X is useless when the 430 is on. One must place a flight plan in the 430 to drive the AP. I have no idea what the situation is with the 650/750. Regardless I understand that Garmin is planning to change this at some point. On another note I personally prefer the D100 to the D10 as a backup unit if space permits. Just getting use to my dual screen G3x system in the 8A. Robin -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of bill.peyton Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2011 6:30 AM Subject: RV10-List: Re: G3X Component Locations The reason I went with the 3 screen system is that both my wife and I are pilots, we use our current plane for lot's of long cross country flights. We intend to do the same with the -10. It seems like the person on the right always ends up flying for a while on long legs, so the 3rd display will take care of that. Also, our plan is to usually have the non-flying pilot take care of the radios, talking to center, looking at weather and navigating. The third display will make this a lot easier. The final reason is that my father, and building partner, just turned 87. He continues to fly and pass his medical and BFR every year. The only issue is insurance. We have been told we will not be able to get any for him without me or an instructor in the right seat. Those are the reasons for my choice of a 3 display system. While the size of the displays are not as large as the AFS or Dynon, they fit very nicely in the panel. I attached my cad image with JPG files overlaid on the panel. Bill -------- Bill Peyton Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=353512#353512 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/complete_panel_699.bmp ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Steve Roberts" <swrpilot(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: Morristown, TN Fly-in
Date: Sep 29, 2011
If you are looking for a $100 hamburger on Saturday, our EAA chapter is holding a fly-in at KMOR, Morristown, TN on Saturday, October 1st from 9 AM to 3 PM. Come see the new Evelyn Johnson Terminal and FBO, one of the nicest you will see for an airport without airline service. There will be food vendor(s) (burgers, etc.) on site. Forecast is sunny and cool and the mountains are starting to show some color. Come and show off your RV-10! Steve Roberts RV-10 Tail Kit N2700W 1966 Mooney M20E 'Ms. Obsession' KMOR Morristown, TN ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: G3X Component Locations
From: Seano <sean(at)braunandco.com>
Date: Sep 29, 2011
Robin, The new update fixes this. I flew mine out today (formation with Scott). I can enter Flt plan on either unit and you can hit internal on the Efis and it uses it's own gps. It's nice to have the g3x on gps and the 430w on loc. Sent from my iPhone On Sep 29, 2011, at 13:07, Robin Marks wrote: > > I agree completely with Bill on his points. One thing not mentioned is the > cost of these systems is not in the screens so adding a third screen is > ~$3,500. > All that being said there are a few gotchya's on the G3X and the 430/530. > The 430 takes over responsibility when on so an flight plan best entered > into the G3X is useless when the 430 is on. One must place a flight plan > in the 430 to drive the AP. I have no idea what the situation is with the > 650/750. Regardless I understand that Garmin is planning to change this at > some point. On another note I personally prefer the D100 to the D10 as a > backup unit if space permits. > Just getting use to my dual screen G3x system in the 8A. > > Robin > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com > [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of bill.peyton > Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2011 6:30 AM > To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: RV10-List: Re: G3X Component Locations > > > The reason I went with the 3 screen system is that both my wife and I are > pilots, we use our current plane for lot's of long cross country flights. > We intend to do the same with the -10. It seems like the person on the > right always ends up flying for a while on long legs, so the 3rd display > will take care of that. Also, our plan is to usually have the non-flying > pilot take care of the radios, talking to center, looking at weather and > navigating. The third display will make this a lot easier. The final > reason is that my father, and building partner, just turned 87. He > continues to fly and pass his medical and BFR every year. The only issue > is insurance. We have been told we will not be able to get any for him > without me or an instructor in the right seat. Those are the reasons for > my choice of a 3 display system. > While the size of the displays are not as large as the AFS or Dynon, they > fit very nicely in the panel. I attached my cad image with JPG files > overlaid on the panel. > Bill > > -------- > Bill Peyton > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=353512#353512 > > > > > Attachments: > > http://forums.matronics.com//files/complete_panel_699.bmp > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Carl Froehlich" <carl.froehlich(at)verizon.net>
Subject: Morristown, TN Fly-in
Date: Sep 29, 2011
Any break on the high $6.56/gal gas price for the fly in? Carl -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Steve Roberts Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2011 4:28 PM Subject: RV10-List: Morristown, TN Fly-in If you are looking for a $100 hamburger on Saturday, our EAA chapter is holding a fly-in at KMOR, Morristown, TN on Saturday, October 1st from 9 AM to 3 PM. Come see the new Evelyn Johnson Terminal and FBO, one of the nicest you will see for an airport without airline service. There will be food vendor(s) (burgers, etc.) on site. Forecast is sunny and cool and the mountains are starting to show some color. Come and show off your RV-10! Steve Roberts RV-10 Tail Kit N2700W 1966 Mooney M20E 'Ms. Obsession' KMOR Morristown, TN ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Morristown, TN Fly-in
From: Miller John <gengrumpy(at)aol.com>
Date: Sep 29, 2011
Stop by KTHA. Our self serv price is about $5.15 or so. On Sep 29, 2011, at 7:48 PM, Carl Froehlich wrote: > > Any break on the high $6.56/gal gas price for the fly in? > > Carl > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com > [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Steve Roberts > Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2011 4:28 PM > To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: RV10-List: Morristown, TN Fly-in > > > If you are looking for a $100 hamburger on Saturday, our EAA chapter is > holding a fly-in at KMOR, Morristown, TN on Saturday, October 1st from 9 AM > to 3 PM. Come see the new Evelyn Johnson Terminal and FBO, one of the > nicest you will see for an airport without airline service. There will be > food vendor(s) (burgers, etc.) on site. Forecast is sunny and cool and the > mountains are starting to show some color. Come and show off your RV-10! > > Steve Roberts > RV-10 Tail Kit > N2700W 1966 Mooney M20E 'Ms. Obsession' KMOR Morristown, TN > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: G3X Component Locations
From: "bill.peyton" <peyton.b(at)sbcglobal.net>
Date: Sep 29, 2011
Robin, When you find out how to update it let me know! That drawback was a great one to fix! Now hopefully ADS-b traffic and weather?? Bill -------- Bill Peyton Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=353580#353580 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Robin Marks <Robin(at)PaintTheWeb.com>
Date: Sep 29, 2011
Subject: Re: G3X Component Locations
It's tentatively on the schedule for this Wednesday. Robin -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of bill.peyton Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2011 7:37 PM Subject: RV10-List: Re: G3X Component Locations Robin, When you find out how to update it let me know! That drawback was a great one to fix! Now hopefully ADS-b traffic and weather?? Bill -------- Bill Peyton Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=353580#353580 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Bob Archer vs. Cat whisker
From: "Strasnuts" <sean(at)braunandco.com>
Date: Sep 29, 2011
Just thought I would let builders know the difference I found today while flying at 10500 directly to BOI VOR. My 430W with the cat whiskers picked up BOI at 71 miles south My SL30 with the Bob Archer picked up BOI at 56 miles south -------- 40936 RV-10 SB N801VR Flying Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=353583#353583 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Seano" <sean(at)braunandco.com>
Subject: Re: G3X Component Locations
Date: Sep 29, 2011
Call me if you have any questions during the update.... goes for you too Bill. 801-580-3737 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Robin Marks" <Robin(at)PaintTheWeb.com> Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2011 9:35 PM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Re: G3X Component Locations > > It's tentatively on the schedule for this Wednesday. > > Robin > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com > [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of bill.peyton > Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2011 7:37 PM > To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: RV10-List: Re: G3X Component Locations > > > Robin, > When you find out how to update it let me know! That drawback was a great > one to fix! Now hopefully ADS-b traffic and weather?? > Bill > > -------- > Bill Peyton > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=353580#353580 > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 30, 2011
From: Werner Schneider <glastar(at)gmx.net>
Subject: Re: G3X Component Locations
I just wonder, what the overall cost for such a system is: G3X with 2 screen, engine monitoring all sensors, AP, the subscribption for air data, backup battery (?) and I guess a 430 is as a minimum mandatory for being able to display for navigation VOR, GPS and ILS as well? Just to compare with the other producer of fine EFIS systems Many thanks Werner On 29.09.2011 22:28, Seano wrote: > --> RV10-List message posted by: Seano > > Robin, > > The new update fixes this. I flew mine out today (formation with Scott). I can enter Flt plan on either unit and you can hit internal on the Efis and it uses it's own gps. It's nice to have the g3x on gps and the 430w on loc. > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Sep 29, 2011, at 13:07, Robin Marks wrote: > >> --> RV10-List message posted by: Robin Marks >> >> I agree completely with Bill on his points. One thing not mentioned is the >> cost of these systems is not in the screens so adding a third screen is >> ~$3,500. >> All that being said there are a few gotchya's on the G3X and the 430/530. >> The 430 takes over responsibility when on so an flight plan best entered >> into the G3X is useless when the 430 is on. One must place a flight plan >> in the 430 to drive the AP. I have no idea what the situation is with the >> 650/750. Regardless I understand that Garmin is planning to change this at >> some point. On another note I personally prefer the D100 to the D10 as a >> backup unit if space permits. >> Just getting use to my dual screen G3x system in the 8A. >> >> Robin >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com >> [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of bill.peyton >> Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2011 6:30 AM >> To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com >> Subject: RV10-List: Re: G3X Component Locations >> >> --> RV10-List message posted by: "bill.peyton" >> >> The reason I went with the 3 screen system is that both my wife and I are >> pilots, we use our current plane for lot's of long cross country flights. >> We intend to do the same with the -10. It seems like the person on the >> right always ends up flying for a while on long legs, so the 3rd display >> will take care of that. Also, our plan is to usually have the non-flying >> pilot take care of the radios, talking to center, looking at weather and >> navigating. The third display will make this a lot easier. The final >> reason is that my father, and building partner, just turned 87. He >> continues to fly and pass his medical and BFR every year. The only issue >> is insurance. We have been told we will not be able to get any for him >> without me or an instructor in the right seat. Those are the reasons for >> my choice of a 3 display system. >> While the size of the displays are not as large as the AFS or Dynon, they >> fit very nicely in the panel. I attached my cad image with JPG files >> overlaid on the panel. >> Bill >> >> -------- >> Bill Peyton >> >> >> >> >> Read this topic online here: >> >> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=353512#353512 >> >> >> >> >> Attachments: >> >> http://forums.matronics.com//files/complete_panel_699.bmp >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 30, 2011
From: Linn Walters <pitts_pilot(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: G3X Component Locations
While you're comparing systems, take a look at MGL ...... http://www.mglavionics.com/. I'm installing two independent Odyssey systems but with only one RDAC, the engine monitor part. It mounts in the engine compartment and only one signal wire penetrates the firewall instead of the huge mass of CHT/EGT wires. Linn On 9/30/2011 2:43 AM, Werner Schneider wrote: > > I just wonder, what the overall cost for such a system is: > > G3X with 2 screen, engine monitoring all sensors, AP, the > subscribption for air data, backup battery (?) and I guess a 430 is as > a minimum mandatory for being able to display for navigation VOR, GPS > and ILS as well? > > Just to compare with the other producer of fine EFIS systems > > Many thanks > > Werner ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: G3X Component Locations
From: "bill.peyton" <peyton.b(at)sbcglobal.net>
Date: Sep 30, 2011
Werner, You can go to the aircraft spruce site and price the whole thing out. You can call SteinAir and get a quote on such a system. The system I have shown in my prior post will cost me $32K. I purchased all of the radios used, although they were never actually installed in aircraft. This saved quite a bit, but sacrificed the warranty. I am doing all my own wiring, EE by trade. So you can add $$ to have the work done for you by an avionics shop. All of the systems are around the same amount within reason. There are features of some that you may want that others don't offer. Dynon is probably the least expensive for what you get, but is also the least capable system. You have to do your own evaluation for how you intend to fly. At one point I had a spreadsheet, but I can't seem to find it today. Bill -------- Bill Peyton Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=353626#353626 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: RobHickman(at)aol.com
Date: Sep 30, 2011
Subject: Re: Bob Archer vs. Cat whisker
Try switching the SL30 and 430W, in my RV-10 with dual Archer the SL30 is far better than the 430W. Rob Hickman N402RH In a message dated 9/29/2011 8:41:08 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, sean(at)braunandco.com writes: --> RV10-List message posted by: "Strasnuts" Just thought I would let builders know the difference I found today while flying at 10500 directly to BOI VOR. My 430W with the cat whiskers picked up BOI at 71 miles south My SL30 with the Bob Archer picked up BOI at 56 miles south -------- 40936 RV-10 SB N801VR Flying Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=353583#353583 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Bob Archer vs. Cat whisker
From: Seano <sean(at)braunandco.com>
Date: Sep 30, 2011
Ya, your right, that would give a better comparison. Sent from my iPhone On Sep 30, 2011, at 13:00, RobHickman(at)aol.com wrote: > Try switching the SL30 and 430W, in my RV-10 with dual Archer the SL30 i s far better than the 430W. > > Rob Hickman > N402RH > > > > > In a message dated 9/29/2011 8:41:08 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, sean@brau nandco.com writes: > > Just thought I would let builders know the difference I found today while f lying at 10500 directly to BOI VOR. > My 430W with the cat whiskers picked up BOI at 71 miles south > My SL30 with the Bob Archer picked up BOI at 56 miles south > > -------- > 40936 > RV-10 SB N801VR Flying > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=353583#353583 > > > > > ========================== ========= ========================== ========= ========================== ========= ========================== ========= > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Morristown, TN Fly-in
From: "Brantel" <bchesteen(at)hughes.net>
Date: Sep 30, 2011
We are sorry about the fuel price....The current lease holder of the FBO seems to be dead set on killing General Aviation. Kind of weird hu? Well our EAA chapter is dead set on promoting GA and bringing life back into our local airport! Anyway, please do not let this ruin a great day trip. There are tons of cheaper options for fuel in every direction around KMOR. The folks here are very friendly and would love to see you here! Brian Chesteen President, EAA Chapter 1494 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=353651#353651 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Robin Marks <Robin(at)PaintTheWeb.com>
Date: Oct 01, 2011
Subject: Re: G3X System Upgrade
Bill, I have not done the update yet but it looks straight forward and simple. If all goes well it should be a 15 minute upgrade unlike the G900X which can be 90 minutes to 3 hours to upgrade (assuming you do EVERYTHING right). Here are the steps as I understand them: Download v.6.2 from Garmin site https://buy.garmin.com/shop/store/downloadsUpdates.jsp?product=010-00G3X-0 0&cID=155&pID=63892 Save to computer desktop (or file) Insert blank SD card (2-4 Gb max) Double Click Downloaded file click to execute which will need to be extract onto the SD card Power up and install one screen at a time to update Then Update the GSU 73 (slightly more difficult than updating the screens) Place GSU in "Configuration Mode" by holding left soft key on PFD while powering on the unit. Scroll to GSU folder Hit Update Software Good luck, Robin ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: G3X System Upgrade
From: "Strasnuts" <sean(at)braunandco.com>
Date: Oct 01, 2011
Robin, Bill, I just want to add: It is nice to update the databases at the same time since you are already inserting the SD cards. Also, if you want to add your own checklist now is the time. I keep the 6.2 version or whatever on one card and the databases, checklists, flight logs on another. I have two 4gb cards that do everything. Just like you said Robin, you plug each card into each screen and the EFIS will ask if you want to update. It is easy. The GSU is just as you said too. It doesn't ask for the GSU update until you are in Config mode on PFD1. Note: You don't have to save file to computer. You can have your SD card plugged in and it will go straight to it. -------- 40936 RV-10 SB N801VR Flying Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=353704#353704 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: North Carolina RV10s?
From: "rvdave" <davidbf(at)centurytel.net>
Date: Oct 02, 2011
I will be flying my RV6 to NC Oct 6-9 for a funeral and wondered if there are any RV10ers in the Advance/Winston Salem area. Also I will have a little free time on Sunday if there is any recommendable exploring to do or see in the area? -------- Dave Ford RV6 flying RV10 building Cadillac, MI Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=353766#353766 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Thane States" <thane2(at)comporium.net>
Subject: Re: North Carolina RV10s?
Date: Oct 02, 2011
Hi Dave, I am based in KUZA, just South of KCLT. I may be around over the weekend. Not sure yet of our plans. I just had my RV-10 painted, after 3 yrs. Thane N321BY ----- Original Message ----- From: "rvdave" <davidbf(at)centurytel.net> Sent: Sunday, October 02, 2011 8:51 AM Subject: RV10-List: North Carolina RV10s? > > I will be flying my RV6 to NC Oct 6-9 for a funeral and wondered if there > are any RV10ers in the Advance/Winston Salem area. Also I will have a > little free time on Sunday if there is any recommendable exploring to do > or see in the area? > > -------- > Dave Ford > RV6 flying > RV10 building > Cadillac, MI > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=353766#353766 > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Ralph E. Capen" <recapen(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Who's in charge at Aircraft spruce?
Date: Oct 02, 2011
Folks, I need some contact information.. Generally, I have gotten good quality and service from these folks - not really trying to bash them - so I won't provide the details yet. I want to provide them with one more chance to get it right and improve their business process to provide a satisfaction level. So, who is in charge at Aircraft Spruce? I have already talked to a bunch of folks there - but no-one that I consider 'in-charge' yet. Ralph Capen ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jack Phillips" <pietflyr(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: Who's in charge at Aircraft spruce?
Date: Oct 02, 2011
Try Jim Erwin. He's the Prsident. _____ From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Ralph E. Capen Sent: Sunday, October 02, 2011 10:12 AM Subject: RV10-List: Who's in charge at Aircraft spruce? Folks, I need some contact information.. Generally, I have gotten good quality and service from these folks - not really trying to bash them - so I won't provide the details yet. I want to provide them with one more chance to get it right and improve their business process to provide a satisfaction level. So, who is in charge at Aircraft Spruce? I have already talked to a bunch of folks there - but no-one that I consider 'in-charge' yet. Ralph Capen ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: North Carolina RV10s?
From: "rvdave" <davidbf(at)centurytel.net>
Date: Oct 02, 2011
Sounds good Thane, I will look you up if I can get a contact number for you, my cell is 231 878 6571 or you could email me rv610dave(at)gmail.com Thanks, -------- Dave Ford RV6 flying RV10 building Cadillac, MI Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=353806#353806 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Pascal" <rv10flyer(at)verizon.net>
Subject: Re: Who's in charge at Aircraft spruce?
Date: Oct 02, 2011
I have dealt with the Corona side, which is where Jim Irwin and his family are located. I never needed to talk to them as I have had issues resolved. Recently I ordered a N number. Forget the cost but the shipping for the 2 vinyl strips was $12.95. I was quite upset as another company charges $20 for the NO number and $2.21 for shipping. I called and spoke with someone out East. Told me it was too bad.. I was upset. Called later and spoke with someone in Corona customer service. She told me not to worry about it as she would take care of it. She credited my credit card and charged me $2 for shipping. The difference in the two attitudes was night and day. Call the West coast number (not 800) and try your issue again, if you go no where, tell them you want the issue escalated, should not need to go that far, if you do call back and ask to speak with Jim. They care about customers, I trust they will take care of you. From: Ralph E. Capen Sent: Sunday, October 02, 2011 7:12 AM Subject: RV10-List: Who's in charge at Aircraft spruce? Folks, I need some contact information. Generally, I have gotten good quality and service from these folks =93 not really trying to bash them =93 so I won=99t provide the details yet. I want to provide them with one more chance to get it right and improve their business process to provide a satisfaction level. So, who is in charge at Aircraft Spruce? I have already talked to a bunch of folks there =93 but no-one that I consider =98in-charge=99 yet. Ralph Capen ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Who's in charge at Aircraft spruce?
From: "Bob Turner" <bobturner(at)alum.rpi.edu>
Date: Oct 02, 2011
"Ditto": Jim read a minor ACS complaint of mine here, and promptly fixed it. Here's his email: jimirwin(at)aircraftspruce.com -------- Bob Turner RV-10 QB Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=353822#353822 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 03, 2011
From: davidsoutpost(at)comcast.net
Subject: Re: Failed Alternator
Just wondering if others are using this alternator instead of the Plane Power from Van's. If any are using this, what if anything did you do for the cooling fan since it is set up for clockwise rotation. Can the fan be flipped or is this a non issue? David Clifford RV-10 Builder Howell, MI ----- Original Message ----- From: "Albert Gardner" <ibspud(at)roadrunner.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2011 9:32:08 PM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Failed Alternator My Vans supplied 60 A alternator failed at about 150 hours. The replacement was an Nippondenso Model 36-14684N from an auto parts store and seems to be working fine at 550 hrs. I get the impression that a suitable alternator may be found under several manufacturer/part no. combinations. Albert Gardner N991RV Yuma, AZ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Carl Froehlich" <carl.froehlich(at)verizon.net>
Subject: Failed Alternator
Date: Oct 03, 2011
After my custom alternator failed (50 hours) in my 8A, I went to Advanced Auto. I now have 600 hours on a Mitsubishi 60 -70 amp, internal regulator, internal fan alternator. While various makes are suitable, the one I have is from a 1990 Mazda 626, 2.2L, L4, Fuel injected. Price is $90-$100 at Advance Auto parts and other auto stores. Two things: - Most of these alternators come with the serpentine type belt. Take the pulley off your old alternator and put it on the new one. - As this these alternators are internally regulated, external overvoltage protection is recommended. I have the output of the alternator going through a 70A breaker, then to an output solenoid before it ties into the battery buss. The output solenoid is on a separate breaker with a crow bar over voltage protection on it that shorts the breaker output - tripping the breaker and thus opening the solenoid on overvoltage. On the RV-10 I'm going with the straight plane power option as the internal over voltage protection simplifies the install. Carl From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of davidsoutpost(at)comcast.net Sent: Sunday, October 02, 2011 9:55 PM Subject: Re: RV10-List: Failed Alternator Just wondering if others are using this alternator instead of the Plane Power from Van's. If any are using this, what if anything did you do for the cooling fan since it is set up for clockwise rotation. Can the fan be flipped or is this a non issue? David Clifford RV-10 Builder Howell, MI _____ From: "Albert Gardner" <ibspud(at)roadrunner.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2011 9:32:08 PM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Failed Alternator My Vans supplied 60 A alternator failed at about 150 hours. The replacement was an Nippondenso Model 36-14684N from an auto parts store and seems to be working fine at 550 hrs. I get the impression that a suitable alternator may be found under several manufacturer/part no. combinations. Albert Gardner N991RV Yuma, AZ ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: 2011 Copperstate RV10 Nest
From: "woxofswa" <woxof(at)aol.com>
Date: Oct 03, 2011
Time for the Fourth (and last) annual Copperstate RV10 nest. (Fifth and last will be next year). I hope to be set up all three days. Definitely the last two. All are welcome anytime for a shady place to crash and relax and grab something out of the cooler. Carne Asada luncheon Saturday noonish. Hope to see a great turnout as we have each year so far. Questions or comments woxof(at)aol.com 602 421-2868 -------- Myron Nelson Mesa, AZ Emp completed, QB wings completed, legacy build fuse in mostly done, finishing kit in progress. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=353967#353967 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Robin Marks <robin(at)PaintTheWeb.com>
Date: Oct 03, 2011
Subject: Alternate Spinner
Is anyone using a spinner other than the standard Vans spinner on the Vans cowl for the -10? Robin ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "DLM" <dlm34077(at)q.com>
Subject: Reno before and after
Date: Oct 03, 2011
Just to give you an idea of how horrific the crash scene was, here are before and after photos of the seating section that was at the point of impact. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Chris Hukill" <cjhukill(at)cox.net>
Subject: Fw: Another possible cause (Reno)
Date: Oct 04, 2011
From a friend who flies corporate jets for The Limited Good News for the future of air racing. Our new crew member, Matt Jackson, is not only a race pilot, aircraft business owner and aircraft owner (he also takes care of Tom Cruises P-51) but he is also the VP of the Unlimited Racing Class and head of the Safety Committee. We had a long talk about the Reno crash on the way to Mojave today. Matt believes the cause of the crash was due to The Galloping Ghost having a CG too close to the aft limit which resulted in pitch instability. There are instructions on the P-51 regarding no combat missions with the aft fuel tank full resulting in an aft CG problem. Instructions specify to empty the aft fuel tank first in flight. During qualifying Matt watched Galloping Ghost from inside the cockpit of Furias and could not believe how much trouble Leeward was having in keeping the Ghost in a stable pattern around the course. Since Leeward lives in Florida and the Galloping Ghost was modified for racing in Calif., when Leeward picked up the Ghost for the Reno races at the last minute, a complete flight test program had not been done based on available information. There is a video of the entire last lap of the Ghost before the crash which Matt showed me. As Leeward was coming around pylon #8 at about 480 mph after passing Rare Bear, he hit turbulence which pitched his left wing down, Leeward corrected with hard right rudder and aileron. Just as the aircraft was straightening out, he hit a second mountain of turbulence which caused the tail to 'dig in' resulting in a 10+ G climb rendering Leeward unconscious instantly and resulted in the tail wheel falling out. (broken tail wheel support structure was found on the course). As the Ghost shot upward the LH elevator trim tab broke loose. This can be heard on the tape, so the trim tab did not cause the accident. Since the Ghost was racing at 480 mph with full right rudder and the stick full right, this is where everything stayed when Leeward blacked out. Cockpit camera film that was salvaged from the wreck shows Leeward slumped over to the right in the cockpit. As a result, the Ghost climbed up and to the right, rolled over on her back and then headed for the box seats. Most in the box seats never saw it coming because it came in from behind them. Matt has had long conversations with the NTSB who call the accident a 'fluke'. They are not going to recommend canceling future races. He has also talked to the insurance companies covering the races for Reno and they also say they are not going to cancel their coverage of future races. Now we wait for the FAA to make a decision. Ironically, Matt bought box seats tickets for his good friends who stayed with him for a few days before the races. They were the husband and wife who were killed. __._,_.___ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Gary Specketer" <speckter(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Alternate Spinner
Date: Oct 04, 2011
I am using an Aero Comsites spinner. Gary Specketer From: Robin Marks Sent: Monday, October 03, 2011 10:34 PM Subject: RV10-List: Alternate Spinner Is anyone using a spinner other than the standard Vans spinner on the Vans cowl for the -10? Robin ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Alternate Spinner
From: "Mike Whisky" <rv-10(at)wellenzohn.net>
Date: Oct 04, 2011
Hi Robin I use the HiGlo spinner from MT it's a chrome finish kevlar composite spinner http://www.mt-propeller.com/en/entw/pro_spin.htm Cheers Mike -------- RV-10 builder (interior & finishing) #511 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=353996#353996 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: David <dmaib(at)mac.com>
Subject: Re: Alternate Spinner
Date: Oct 04, 2011
I have an MT propeller, so am using the MT spinner that comes with the prop. MT makes them to fit the RV-10 cowl. Very nice spinner and is ready for paint when it arrives. But, of course, you have to be swinging the MT prop! David Maib 40559 Flying On Oct 3, 2011, at 10:34 PM, Robin Marks wrote: > Is anyone using a spinner other than the standard Vans spinner on > the Vans cowl for the -10? > > Robin > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: RV-10 down in Marieeta, OH
From: "AirMike" <Mikeabel(at)Pacbell.net>
Date: Oct 04, 2011
I hope that the pilots are recovering ok. Any news out there how they are doing. I hope the news is good. Let's all pray for full their full recovery. A day does not go by without me thinking of them - hoping and praying for their full recovery. -------- See you OSH '12 Q/B - flying 2 yrs. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=354000#354000 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Painting SS Screws
From: "jayb" <jaybrinkmeyer(at)yahoo.com>
Date: Oct 04, 2011
I'm considering painting the stainless screws that hold the panel in place. Does anything special need to be done to prep them for the paint to stick? I'm using PPG auto paint if it matters. Thanks, Jay Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=354002#354002 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: John Ackerman <johnag5b(at)cableone.net>
Subject: Re: Alternate Spinner
Date: Oct 04, 2011
Robin: Those who have the Aerocomposites prop likely have the Aerocomposites spinner. It's a thing of beauty. I'm given to understand it is a standard Vans spinner modified at the forward bulkhead with an integral support ring. Mine is a delight - it runs perfectly true as well as I can tell. Easy to install- no fuss, no muss. John Ackerman On Oct 3, 2011, at 7:34 PM, Robin Marks wrote: > Is anyone using a spinner other than the standard Vans spinner on the Vans cowl for the -10? > > Robin > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Pascal" <rv10flyer(at)verizon.net>
Subject: Re: Painting SS Screws
Date: Oct 04, 2011
I did the following 320 sandpaper or scotchbrite. clean prime paint I recall Tim shows how she painted his screws on his site. -----Original Message----- From: jayb Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2011 7:39 AM Subject: RV10-List: Painting SS Screws I'm considering painting the stainless screws that hold the panel in place. Does anything special need to be done to prep them for the paint to stick? I'm using PPG auto paint if it matters. Thanks, Jay Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=354002#354002 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 04, 2011
From: Bill Watson <Mauledriver(at)nc.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Painting SS Screws
Haven't tried that yet but should work after a quick thinner wipe. It works well with galvanized screws using Imron products I had SS cap screws holding my panel but went to black - just bought replacements from McMaster Carr. I assume you are using flat head SS screws and I don't think you can buy them in black or colors. Bill On 10/4/2011 10:39 AM, jayb wrote: > --> RV10-List message posted by: "jayb" > > I'm considering painting the stainless screws that hold the panel in place. Does anything special need to be done to prep them for the paint to stick? I'm using PPG auto paint if it matters. > > Thanks, > Jay > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Robin Marks <robin(at)PaintTheWeb.com>
Date: Oct 04, 2011
Subject: Re: Alternate Spinner
Interesting, do you have a photo of your spinner on your plane? Do you recall the $. Thanks, Robin -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Mike Whisky Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2011 5:43 AM Subject: RV10-List: Re: Alternate Spinner Hi Robin I use the HiGlo spinner from MT it's a chrome finish kevlar composite spinner http://www.mt-propeller.com/en/entw/pro_spin.htm Cheers Mike -------- RV-10 builder (interior & finishing) #511 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=353996#353996 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Alternate Spinner
From: Michael Kraus <n223rv(at)wolflakeairport.net>
Date: Oct 04, 2011
I have one too, here is mine. It was like a $500 option, but it sure is pret ty!! -Mike K Sent from my iPhone On Oct 4, 2011, at 11:47 AM, Robin Marks wrote: > > Interesting, do you have a photo of your spinner on your plane? Do you > recall the $. > > Thanks, > Robin > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com > [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Mike Whisky > Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2011 5:43 AM > To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: RV10-List: Re: Alternate Spinner > > > Hi Robin > I use the HiGlo spinner from MT it's a chrome finish kevlar composite > spinner > http://www.mt-propeller.com/en/entw/pro_spin.htm > > Cheers > Mike > > -------- > RV-10 builder (interior & finishing) > #511 > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=353996#353996 > > > > > > > > > > >

      
      
      
________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: 5inch before and after redcube fuel-transducer
From: "Mike Whisky" <rv-10(at)wellenzohn.net>
Date: Oct 04, 2011
Hello all, I thought Id post my solution of the position of the fuel flow sensor (red cube). For those who are looking for an alternative position. Mike -------- RV-10 builder (interior & finishing) #511 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=354052#354052 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/dsc_0032_883.jpg http://forums.matronics.com//files/dsc_0031_110.jpg ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: 2011 Copperstate RV10 Nest
From: "woxofswa" <woxof(at)aol.com>
Date: Oct 05, 2011
For planning purposes, I'd love to get a heads up from those planning on attending the lunch. Guests are welcome too. Hope to see a bunch of ya's soon. -------- Myron Nelson Mesa, AZ Emp completed, QB wings completed, legacy build fuse in mostly done, finishing kit in progress. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=354092#354092 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Throttle, Mixture and Prop Stroke?
From: "conradb" <conradbooze(at)cox.net>
Date: Oct 05, 2011
I am ordering a set of ACS Control Cables for the engine of the RV-10 and when inquiring to Aircraft Spruce received the following reply: "Van A-1760 controls are custom made. I will need to know the length of stroke required per control. Standard strokes are 2-1/4 & 2-1/2 inches. Strokes of 2-3/8", 2-3/4" & 3-1/2" can be produced at a additional fee of $45 added to the cost of the control. You will need to provide the stroke before I can provide a price and lead time." Another RV-10 builder recommended the following for length: ACS Controls > 49.5" throttle > 52.5" mixture p# A-1760-20-0525-V > 73.5" prop p# A-1760-30-0735-V. My Question is this: Are the Standard Strokes of 2.25 and 2.50 enough. Thanks; Conrad Booze Still Working on the X-10 Project !! -------- Conrad Booze Sr. Engineer P. O. Box 7028 Warner Robins, GA. 31095 (478)-335-4264 conradbooze(at)cox.net Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=354132#354132 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: RobHickman(at)aol.com
Date: Oct 06, 2011
Subject: Re: 2011 Copperstate RV10 Nest
I will be there with my RV-10. Rob Hickman N402RH In a message dated 10/5/2011 10:40:40 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, woxof(at)aol.com writes: --> RV10-List message posted by: "woxofswa" For planning purposes, I'd love to get a heads up from those planning on attending the lunch. Guests are welcome too. Hope to see a bunch of ya's soon. -------- Myron Nelson Mesa, AZ Emp completed, QB wings completed, legacy build fuse in mostly done, finishing kit in progress. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=354092#354092 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 06, 2011
Subject: iPad Geeks: AHRS
From: Phillip Perry <philperry9(at)gmail.com>
I don't know how I missed this at Oshkosh, but I did. http://www.aviation.levil.com/AHRS_mini.htm It is a mini-AHRS that can be installed in your airplane and it uses a wireless connection to your iPad. This is almost worth simply throwing into your flight bag as a backup to your backup. It doesn't cost much in terms of weight and if you plumb your pitot/static system correctly you can put an emergency plug-in for it in a corner of your panel with a quick-connect. Pretty cool stuff. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 07, 2011
From: Bill Watson <Mauledriver(at)nc.rr.com>
Subject: What kind of max RPMs are you getting from your IO540
I'm still under 40 hours on my IO540-D4A5. On takeoff (from 350' MSL) I'm getting a momentary max RPM of 2690 at that point in the ground run when the engine speed up to it's max. Then it settles down to 2540 for lift-off and initial climb. (figures from GRT logs) I understand the max rated power is achieved at 2700 rpms. I'm thinking that's consistent with what I'm seeing. Is it? Are seeing similar numbers? Thanks. Bill "flying a little and tinkering a lot" Watson ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Cumins" <jcumins(at)jcis.net>
Subject: What kind of max RPMs are you getting from your IO540
Date: Oct 07, 2011
Bill Sounds like the governor max stop is a bit off. You should be able to get 2700 in flight at full power. John Cumins President 707-425-7100 707-425-7576 Fax -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Bill Watson Sent: Friday, October 07, 2011 12:25 PM Subject: RV10-List: What kind of max RPMs are you getting from your IO540 I'm still under 40 hours on my IO540-D4A5. On takeoff (from 350' MSL) I'm getting a momentary max RPM of 2690 at that point in the ground run when the engine speed up to it's max. Then it settles down to 2540 for lift-off and initial climb. (figures from GRT logs) I understand the max rated power is achieved at 2700 rpms. I'm thinking that's consistent with what I'm seeing. Is it? Are seeing similar numbers? Thanks. Bill "flying a little and tinkering a lot" Watson ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "RV Builder (Michael Sausen)" <rvbuilder(at)sausen.net>
Subject: Panel Audio/Data Diagrams
Date: Oct 07, 2011
Being a big fan of peer reviewed eye charts I thought I would throw my data /audio diagrams for my panel out to the group and see if anyone had any com ments or thoughts on it. The first page just shows who is talking to who, the following pages are just a device view, and then there are two block d iagrams near the end that show the connections between all the devices. Michael ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 07, 2011
From: Bill Watson <Mauledriver(at)nc.rr.com>
Subject: Re: What kind of max RPMs are you getting from your IO540
That may well be the case. Seems like it should be easy to remedy. Will have to hit the manuals. Any advice welcome here. Bill On 10/7/2011 3:51 PM, John Cumins wrote: > --> RV10-List message posted by: "John Cumins" > > Bill > > Sounds like the governor max stop is a bit off. You should be able to get > 2700 in flight at full power. > > > John Cumins > President > 707-425-7100 > 707-425-7576 Fax > > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com > [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Bill Watson > Sent: Friday, October 07, 2011 12:25 PM > To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: RV10-List: What kind of max RPMs are you getting from your IO540 > > --> RV10-List message posted by: Bill Watson > > I'm still under 40 hours on my IO540-D4A5. On takeoff (from 350' MSL) I'm > getting a momentary max RPM of 2690 at that point in the ground run when the > engine speed up to it's max. Then it settles down to 2540 for lift-off and > initial climb. (figures from GRT logs) > > I understand the max rated power is achieved at 2700 rpms. I'm thinking > that's consistent with what I'm seeing. Is it? Are seeing similar numbers? > > Thanks. > > Bill "flying a little and tinkering a lot" Watson > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: What kind of max RPMs are you getting from your IO540
From: Michael Kraus <n223rv(at)wolflakeairport.net>
Date: Oct 07, 2011
I get 2700 rpm on takeoff and through climb until I dial it back.... Sounds like your governor needs a small adjustment. Easy to do, but trial and error to set it right. It should be in the manual. -Mike Sent from my iPhone On Oct 7, 2011, at 3:24 PM, Bill Watson wrote: > > I'm still under 40 hours on my IO540-D4A5. On takeoff (from 350' MSL) I'm getting a momentary max RPM of 2690 at that point in the ground run when the engine speed up to it's max. Then it settles down to 2540 for lift-off and initial climb. (figures from GRT logs) > > I understand the max rated power is achieved at 2700 rpms. I'm thinking that's consistent with what I'm seeing. Is it? Are seeing similar numbers? > > Thanks. > > Bill "flying a little and tinkering a lot" Watson > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 07, 2011
From: Linn Walters <pitts_pilot(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: What kind of max RPMs are you getting from your IO540
On 10/7/2011 3:24 PM, Bill Watson wrote: > > I'm still under 40 hours on my IO540-D4A5. On takeoff (from 350' MSL) > I'm getting a momentary max RPM of 2690 at that point in the ground > run when the engine speed up to it's max. Then it settles down to > 2540 for lift-off and initial climb. (figures from GRT logs) I think that's strange too. The faster the airplane goes the higher the RPM .... to a point. Did you get the numbers backwards? > > I understand the max rated power is achieved at 2700 rpms. I looked in my manual. The HP depends on how much fuel you can feed it. (CR = 8.5:1, 25 BTDC timing) At best power the engine produces 75% power @ 2700 RPM @ 17+ GPH 85% power @ 2700 RPM @ 19- GPH and the graph continues up to 260HP @ 21.5 GPH! All at 2700 RPM. Now, upgrade to the IO-540-K (8.7:1 CR and 20 deg BTDC timing) and you get 75% power @ 2700 RPM @ 19 GPH 85% power @ 2700 RPM @ 21 GPH and the graph continues up to 300HP @ 24 GPH! All at 2700 RPM. I guess it all depends on the mission. > I'm thinking that's consistent with what I'm seeing. Is it? Are > seeing similar numbers? I wish I could answer that. I'm still building, and making some progress!!! Linn > Thanks. > > Bill "flying a little and tinkering a lot" Watson > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 07, 2011
Subject: Re: What kind of max RPMs are you getting from your IO540
From: Rob Kochman <rv10rob(at)gmail.com>
If you use the MT governor from Vans and the standard engine IO-540-D4A5 you will have the low RPM problem. See the governor manual, but I believe a complete turn of the high RPM stop screw yields a RPM increase of 50. Quick, simple adjustment. With that set properly, you may see RPM above 2700 if you advance the throttle quickly for takeoff. That requires a propeller adjustment (see your prop manual). -Rob On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 1:13 PM, Bill Watson wrote: > > That may well be the case. Seems like it should be easy to remedy. Will > have to hit the manuals. Any advice welcome here. > > Bill > > > On 10/7/2011 3:51 PM, John Cumins wrote: > >> --> RV10-List message posted by: "John Cumins" >> >> Bill >> >> Sounds like the governor max stop is a bit off. You should be able to get >> 2700 in flight at full power. >> >> >> John Cumins >> President >> 707-425-7100 >> 707-425-7576 Fax >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: owner-rv10-list-server@**matronics.com<owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com> >> [mailto:owner-rv10-list-**server(at)matronics.com] >> On Behalf Of Bill Watson >> Sent: Friday, October 07, 2011 12:25 PM >> To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com >> Subject: RV10-List: What kind of max RPMs are you getting from your IO540 >> >> --> RV10-List message posted by: Bill Watson >> >> I'm still under 40 hours on my IO540-D4A5. On takeoff (from 350' MSL) I'm >> getting a momentary max RPM of 2690 at that point in the ground run when >> the >> engine speed up to it's max. Then it settles down to 2540 for lift-off >> and >> initial climb. (figures from GRT logs) >> >> I understand the max rated power is achieved at 2700 rpms. I'm thinking >> that's consistent with what I'm seeing. Is it? Are seeing similar >> numbers? >> >> Thanks. >> >> Bill "flying a little and tinkering a lot" Watson >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > -- Rob Kochman RV-10 Flying since March 2011 Woodinville, WA http://kochman.net/N819K ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: What kind of max RPMs are you getting from your IO540
From: Dave Saylor <dave.saylor.aircrafters(at)gmail.com>
Date: Oct 07, 2011
I like to see a tiny bit over 2700, like 10 or 20 rpm. You should be able to get that right from the start. Power increases about proportionally with rpm so running 100 low loses you several horses. Wish I could see MP at ambient... --Dave On Oct 7, 2011, at 15:24, Bill Watson wrote: > > I'm still under 40 hours on my IO540-D4A5. On takeoff (from 350' MSL) I'm getting a momentary max RPM of 2690 at that point in the ground run when the engine speed up to it's max. Then it settles down to 2540 for lift-off and initial climb. (figures from GRT logs) > > I understand the max rated power is achieved at 2700 rpms. I'm thinking that's consistent with what I'm seeing. Is it? Are seeing similar numbers? > > Thanks. > > Bill "flying a little and tinkering a lot" Watson > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 07, 2011
From: Kelly McMullen <kellym(at)aviating.com>
Subject: Re: What kind of max RPMs are you getting from your IO540
Those fuel flows sound low for full power. I would expect 22-23 gph, because a 200 hp Lycoming needs ~17gph on takeoff to have EGT where you want it, roughly 200 ROP, or about 1250F. 300 hp engine should need around 26-27. I know an IO550 Continental with 310 hp needs 29-30 gph for takeoff. On 10/7/2011 1:34 PM, Linn Walters wrote: > -I looked in my manual. The HP depends on how much fuel you can feed it. > (CR = 8.5:1, 25 BTDC timing) > At best power the engine produces > 75% power @ 2700 RPM @ 17+ GPH > 85% power @ 2700 RPM @ 19- GPH > and the graph continues up to 260HP @ 21.5 GPH! > All at 2700 RPM. > > Now, upgrade to the IO-540-K (8.7:1 CR and 20 deg BTDC timing) and you > get > 75% power @ 2700 RPM @ 19 GPH > 85% power @ 2700 RPM @ 21 GPH > and the graph continues up to 300HP @ 24 GPH! > All at 2700 RPM. > > I guess it all depends on the mission. >> I'm thinking that's consistent with what I'm seeing. Is it? Are >> seeing similar numbers? > I wish I could answer that. I'm still building, and making some > progress!!! > Linn > >> Thanks. >> >> Bill "flying a little and tinkering a lot" Watson >> >> >> >> >> >> > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Panel Audio/Data Diagrams
From: "dmaib(at)me.com" <dmaib(at)me.com>
Date: Oct 07, 2011
Looks like a great setup. You are going to love your VP-200. My Infinity grip is similar to yours, except I have rudder trim instead of flaps. My flap switch is on the panel. If I had it to do over again, I would make the pinky finger switch on the bottom of the grip, a starter button. VP protects you from accidentally engaging the starter when you don't want to. I just find it would be nice to be able to hold the stick with my left hand and throttle with the right while starting. As it is, I hold the stick between my knees, hit the starter button with my left hand and use the right hand for the throttle. Not a big enough deal for me to go back and change it now, but one of those things I would change on the build, knowing what I know now. I use the rudder trim so infrequently, that it could easily reside on the panel. In fact, I might not even put rudder trim in if I was doing it again. I have my ACK button where you have your flap control. I find that I use that button a lot, since it is also the button that advances you through the VP checklists. All personal preference, but my $.02 worth. Again, you are going to have a 1st class setup there. -------- David Maib RV-10 #40559 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=354329#354329 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: What kind of max RPMs are you getting from your IO540
From: "Bob Turner" <bobturner(at)alum.rpi.edu>
Date: Oct 07, 2011
My YIO-540-D4A5 data plate says it's certified for 260 HP at 2700 RPM, or 250 HP at 2600 RPM. My guess is the effective (power to the airplane) power loss with lower RPM is smaller than that 10 HP, since the prop is less efficient at the higher RPM's. I have the Hartzell governor, and it came pre-adjusted to 2650 RPM. I haven't bothered to tweak it upwards yet, and I'm wondering if I ever will. I like the idea of keeping the noise down a bit, and I certainly don't need the power from my home airport (400' MSL). Of course, if I'm at Leadville on a hot day and heavy, I may wish I had every HP available. -------- Bob Turner RV-10 QB Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=354352#354352 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: What kind of max RPMs are you getting from your IO540
From: "Bob Turner" <bobturner(at)alum.rpi.edu>
Date: Oct 07, 2011
PS to Bill: You shouldn't be seeing a 150 RPM overrun of the governor, if you're taking at least a full second or more to push the throttle in. Either the oil hasn't warmed up, or the oil passage is clogged a bit, or something else. You do test the prop once or twice during run up, to get warm oil up there, right? -------- Bob Turner RV-10 QB Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=354354#354354 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Panel Audio/Data Diagrams
From: "Bob Turner" <bobturner(at)alum.rpi.edu>
Date: Oct 07, 2011
Since you asked.... I have a Trio autopilot, so I'm not sure about yours, but mine puts out a warning tone on disconnect so you need an un-switched input on your audio panel for that. The Dynon D-10 will put out a warning tone associated with the AOA (if you have the supporting pitot tube and plumbing) so you need an un-switched audio input for that. Your SL-30 shows one audio line out. That will work (the SL-30 can combine com and nav audio internally) but many people like separate lines, so you can select them on the audio panel. Or use another un-switched input for the nav line and select it on the SL-30 itself (that's what I do). I can't see what kind of Garmin GPS you have (not familiar with the new ones) but if it has a com and a VOR you'll need 2 lines to the audio panel for them. Does your AFS EFIS put out any warning tones? Maybe for AOA? If so, another line to another un-switched input on the audio panel. It's amazing how many wires go into these audio panels (no wonder labor costs are high on them), especially if you have a four place stereo intercom. (I didn't see the intercom wires on your diagram, either. But each person gets 5 wires plus shields.) -------- Bob Turner RV-10 QB Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=354357#354357 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Panel Audio/Data Diagrams
From: "Bob Turner" <bobturner(at)alum.rpi.edu>
Date: Oct 07, 2011
What is the oxygen control (?) instrument pictured? I don't think I've ever seen that before. -------- Bob Turner RV-10 QB Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=354358#354358 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 07, 2011
From: Bill Watson <Mauledriver(at)nc.rr.com>
Subject: Re: What kind of max RPMs are you getting from your IO540
I do test, just once, and very briefly. It's the way I was taught. I'm taking more than a second to push the throttle. I'll be paying a lot more attention to these things the next couple of takeoffs - we'll see. On 10/7/2011 8:36 PM, Bob Turner wrote: > --> RV10-List message posted by: "Bob Turner" > > PS to Bill: > > You shouldn't be seeing a 150 RPM overrun of the governor, if you're taking at least a full second or more to push the throttle in. Either the oil hasn't warmed up, or the oil passage is clogged a bit, or something else. You do test the prop once or twice during run up, to get warm oil up there, right? > > -------- > Bob Turner > RV-10 QB > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=354354#354354 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 07, 2011
From: Linn Walters <pitts_pilot(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: Panel Audio/Data Diagrams
On 10/7/2011 8:54 PM, Bob Turner wrote: > --> RV10-List message posted by: "Bob Turner" snip! Most of the extraneous audio inputs can be capacitive coupled to a single unswitched input. > > It's amazing how many wires go into these audio panels (no wonder labor costs are high on them), especially if you have a four place stereo intercom. (I didn't see the intercom wires on your diagram, either. But each person gets 5 wires plus shields.) 5?? Lessee Audio L & R, Mic and Mic Key. My fingers say 4. So that's probably a typo??? :-P And being the mean thing I am I didn't give the back seaters a mic key!!!! Linn > > -------- > Bob Turner > RV-10 QB > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=354357#354357 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 07, 2011
Subject: Re: What kind of max RPMs are you getting from your IO540
From: Kelly McMullen <apilot2(at)gmail.com>
Given the acceleration of the -10, on all but a sub-1000ft strip, I would ease the throttle in slowly enough that you are at rotation speed when you got full throttle(i.e. more than 5 sec). I don't like to shock the plugs or cylinders with rapid throttle increases, and learned years ago that very slow throttle addition prevented rock dings in the prop when operating off gravel strips. On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 6:20 PM, Bill Watson wrote: > > I do test, just once, and very briefly. It's the way I was taught. I'm > taking more than a second to push the throttle. > > I'll be paying a lot more attention to these things the next couple of > takeoffs - we'll see. > > > On 10/7/2011 8:36 PM, Bob Turner wrote: >> >> >> PS to Bill: >> >> You shouldn't be seeing a 150 RPM overrun of the governor, if you're >> taking at least a full second or more to push the throttle in. Either the >> oil hasn't warmed up, or the oil passage is clogged a bit, or something >> else. You do test the prop once or twice during run up, to get warm oil up >> there, right? >> >> -------- >> Bob Turner >> RV-10 QB >> >> >> >> >> Read this topic online here: >> >> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=354354#354354 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Panel Audio/Data Diagrams
From: "Bob Turner" <bobturner(at)alum.rpi.edu>
Date: Oct 07, 2011
Tying together various outputs is okay as long as they all have a high impedance looking "backwards" into the device. Not all do. I've seen the old Cessna audio panels that just paralleled the inputs. As you selected more radios to "on", the volumes all dropped lower and lower. Not good. No, I didn't mis-count the wires to the individual headsets. Good practice is to not use the airframe ground for the 'return' lines. This helps avoid ground loops which show up as unwanted noise. So you need a left, right, and common for the headphone, plus shield (3 wires inside a braided shield). For the mike, you need a 'hot' (to middle connector) and a 'return', plus shield (2 twisted wires inside a shield). Install insulating washers under the jacks to keep the airframe out of the loop (Stein sells them). Add one more wire if you want the passenger to have PTT! -:) -------- Bob Turner RV-10 QB Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=354367#354367 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "RV Builder (Michael Sausen)" <rvbuilder(at)sausen.net>
Subject: Re: Panel Audio/Data Diagrams
Date: Oct 08, 2011
Bob, it's the MH EDS 4ip. http://www.mhoxygen.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=47:eds-4ip-faa-cami-tested&catid=38:built-in-o2-systems-ip&Itemid=44 Michael -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Bob Turner Sent: Friday, October 07, 2011 7:59 PM Subject: RV10-List: Re: Panel Audio/Data Diagrams What is the oxygen control (?) instrument pictured? I don't think I've ever seen that before. -------- Bob Turner RV-10 QB Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=354358#354358 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Panel Audio/Data Diagrams
From: "Bob Turner" <bobturner(at)alum.rpi.edu>
Date: Oct 08, 2011
Thanks for the info. Looks very nice. -------- Bob Turner RV-10 QB Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=354412#354412 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "DLM" <dlm34077(at)q.com>
Subject: bird strike season
Date: Oct 08, 2011
I have seen many large birds (falcons) flying in our area. Fortunately the latest bird strike was a small sparrow. It struck today just after departure from Sedona. It hit the right wing to fuselage intersection fairing. The fairing flexed and bent concave and left the bird inside the leading edge. We were able to remove the fairing straighten and reinstall. I will replace it at annual and repaint it before installation. Another strike occurred about two weeks ago on departure from Dalhart. A small bird struck the left wing leading edge at a rib; the rain removed the gore and no damage was noted. Watch out for the big birds. They fly IFR without a clearance; especially the north to south migrations this season. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Deems Davis" <deemsdavis(at)cox.net>
Subject: bird strike season
Date: Oct 08, 2011
Reminds me, on our trip back east last month, flying into Republic airport (FRG) on Long Island, we were @ 1200' midfield downwind landing, at the end of a beautiful flight up the coastline from NC. When.... 1. A very startled (and I assume scared) seagull, appeared out of nowhere about 2 ft above the cowl on my wife's side of the windscreen. I say it must have been startled because it was contorted into anything but a 'flying attitude'. 2. My wife tried to raise her hands across her face and to flinch/duck. The next thing, we heard a loud thump on the top of the cabin cover. I took stock of the controls and instruments, and everything appeared to be functioning and responding correctly. Radioed the tower that we had a bird strike, and we cleared to land. On shut down we were greeted by airport Ops. Who wanted to know if we had any damage. I told them that they were 1st after me. Turned out that there was no damage. (To the airplane that is, I still have this mental image of someone in the parking lot of the shopping mall below wondering why this dead seagull fell from the sky. : ) There were no other birds that we saw before or after the collision. It happened so fast that it was literally over in a split second. However it took a half hour for the adrenalin to exit our bloodstreams. Deems From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of DLM Sent: Saturday, October 08, 2011 5:03 PM Subject: RV10-List: bird strike season I have seen many large birds (falcons) flying in our area. Fortunately the latest bird strike was a small sparrow. It struck today just after departure from Sedona. It hit the right wing to fuselage intersection fairing. The fairing flexed and bent concave and left the bird inside the leading edge. We were able to remove the fairing straighten and reinstall. I will replace it at annual and repaint it before installation. Another strike occurred about two weeks ago on departure from Dalhart. A small bird struck the left wing leading edge at a rib; the rain removed the gore and no damage was noted. Watch out for the big birds. They fly IFR without a clearance; especially the north to south migrations this season. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Prop ground clearance
From: "johngoodman" <johngoodman(at)earthlink.net>
Date: Oct 09, 2011
Any suggestions on how to increase prop arc ground clearance? The obvious one is a smaller prop, or a 3 blade, but how about a larger nose tire, or a slightly longer WD-1016 nose gear link assembly where it joins WD-1017.... John -------- #40572 Phase One complete and flying. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=354450#354450 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Prop ground clearance
From: "johngoodman" <johngoodman(at)earthlink.net>
Date: Oct 10, 2011
Thanks for the response. The only practical way to change the strut would be making a slightly longer WD-1016. It's probably not a great idea. My only reluctance for going to a three blade prop is my understanding that it would require another Phase One fly off - right? John -------- #40572 Phase One complete and flying. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=354501#354501 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 10, 2011
Subject: Re: Prop ground clearance
From: Kelly McMullen <apilot2(at)gmail.com>
In theory, yes. However, I believe for most ops limitations today that is an additional 5 hours, not 40 hours. On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 5:38 AM, johngoodman wrote: > > Thanks for the response. The only practical way to change the strut would be making a slightly longer WD-1016. It's probably not a great idea. > My only reluctance for going to a three blade prop is my understanding that it would require another Phase One fly off - right? > > John > > -------- > #40572 Phase One complete and flying. > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=354501#354501 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Bill Gipson <gipsowh(at)hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: Prop ground clearance
Date: Oct 10, 2011
John=2C I was required to fly 5 hours only in my original Phase I area and document in maintenance log when I changed props. Bill Gipson > Subject: RV10-List: Re: Prop ground clearance > From: johngoodman(at)earthlink.net > Date: Mon=2C 10 Oct 2011 05:38:22 -0700 > To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com > > > > Thanks for the response. The only practical way to change the strut would be making a slightly longer WD-1016. It's probably not a great idea. > My only reluctance for going to a three blade prop is my understanding th at it would require another Phase One fly off - right? > > John > > -------- > #40572 Phase One complete and flying. > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=354501#354501 > > > > > > > =========== =========== =========== =========== > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Prop ground clearance
From: "johngoodman" <johngoodman(at)earthlink.net>
Date: Oct 10, 2011
The big reason that another Phase One bothers me, is that insurance doesn't give full coverage in Phase One - we discovered that one when a guy had a fire the day before his inspection. Luckily he was under builder's risk and not Phase One. John -------- #40572 Phase One complete and flying. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=354515#354515 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 10, 2011
From: Matt Dralle <dralle(at)matronics.com>
Subject: Ameri-King AK-450 vs ACK E-10 Remote Control Panel...
Greetings Listers, I have an RV-6 with an ACK E-01 ELT unit and the small Remote Control Panel (RCP) unit. Last month, I completely replaced the instrument panel in the airplane and when I removed the ELT's RCP, I noticed that one of the mounting holes was broken off. I had another ELT on the shelf for another project and so I grabbed the RCP from it and designed a hole in the new instrument panel for it. The hole for this RCP was about twice the height of the hole for the RCP from the E-01 but appeared to be exactly the same as far as make and connector hole. Well, I didn't really put two and two together at the time but the E-01 is from ACK Technologies, and the RCP from the other unit is an Ameri-King AK-450. Except for the difference in vertical size the two RCP's look exactly the same and accept the same RJ-11 connector. Both have a Red and a Black button and a single Red LED. Both take a 3 volt battery. But here's the bummer, after I put everything back together this weekend, it turns out that the new RCP will NOT turn the E-01 on/off. If I plug the original E-01 RCP in to the same RJ-11 wire, it does turn the E-01 on/off, so the wiring and E-01 are fine. It just seems that the internal wiring of the two different RCP's is slightly different. The bigger bummer is that now I have a large hole in my panel for the RCP that doesn't work, so I have to figure something out. The original-sized RCP won't fit because its too small and the panel hole is too big. Can anyone lend any advice on the situation? Surely others have run into this before. Thanks! Matt Dralle - Matt "Red Dawg" Dralle RV-8 #82880 N998RV "Ruby Vixen" http://www.mattsrv8.com - Matt's Complete RV-8 Construction Log http://www.mattsrv8.com/Mishap - Landing Mishap Rebuild Log http://www.youtube.com/MattsRV8 - Matt's RV-8 HDTV YouTube Channel Status: 170+ Hours TTSN - Rebuilding Fuselage After Landing Mishap... ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Andrew Johnson" <noconwud(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Can Weld-on or any other plexiglass bonding agent be purchased
at a local store?
Date: Oct 10, 2011
I've looked in places like West Marine, etc, with no luck. I'm wondering if there are any chain stores or a type of specialty store that would have weld-on, or another type of equally strong bonding agent. I hate having to purchase from Vans and then have it trucked the entire way across country. Thanks in advance. Andy Johnson ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 10, 2011
From: Linn Walters <pitts_pilot(at)bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: Can Weld-on or any other plexiglass bonding agent be purchased
at a local store? Try a large sign shop. That's where I get mine. Linn On 10/10/2011 1:36 PM, Andrew Johnson wrote: > > > I've looked in places like West Marine, etc, with no luck. I'm > wondering if there are any chain stores or a type of specialty store > that would have weld-on, or another type of equally strong bonding > agent. I hate having to purchase from Vans and then have it trucked > the entire way across country. > > Thanks in advance. > > Andy Johnson > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Can Weld-on or any other plexiglass bonding agent be purchased
at a local store?
From: Michael Kraus <n223rv(at)wolflakeairport.net>
Date: Oct 10, 2011
I used Sika Flex, purchased from Jamestown Distributers. Sent from my iPhone On Oct 10, 2011, at 1:36 PM, "Andrew Johnson" wrote: > > I've looked in places like West Marine, etc, with no luck. I'm wondering if there are any chain stores or a type of specialty store that would have weld-on, or another type of equally strong bonding agent. I hate having to purchase from Vans and then have it trucked the entire way across country. > > Thanks in advance. > > Andy Johnson > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Can Weld-on or any other plexiglass bonding agent be purchas
From: "rv10flyer" <wayne.gillispie(at)yahoo.com>
Date: Oct 10, 2011
http://www.theengineerguy.com/ This is where I puchased Weld-On 45 for transparencies. Great product and customer service. -------- Wayne Gillispie, A&P 5/93, PPC 10/08 Bldr# 40983SB Baffles then fuel/oil/exhaust. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=354562#354562 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 10, 2011
Subject: Re: Can Weld-on or any other plexiglass bonding agent be purchased
at a local store?
From: John Cox <rv10pro(at)gmail.com>
Ask Tap Plastics if they could consider stocking it. John 40600 On Oct 10, 2011 10:42 AM, "Andrew Johnson" wrote: > > I've looked in places like West Marine, etc, with no luck. I'm wondering > if there are any chain stores or a type of specialty store that would have > weld-on, or another type of equally strong bonding agent. I hate having to > purchase from Vans and then have it trucked the entire way across country. > > Thanks in advance. > > Andy Johnson > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Dave Saylor <dave.saylor.aircrafters(at)gmail.com>
Date: Oct 10, 2011
Subject: Re: Panel Audio/Data Diagrams
Hi Michael, Here' a similar block diagram to yours. This is after a few changes so it could probably be a little cleaner, but everything's working and stable. We used to have a 496, which has some hidden options for audio output than the 696 lacks. If you're interested, look up my post on AeroElectric from 11/6/07. That took a while to figure out. For the last few panels we've built, we run all the serial wires into a single CPC connector, then use the mating connector to make the interconnects. You end up with a connector on one side that's a "key". Then if you make changes or additions in the future, you can just take the key to the bench and jumper around in the mating connector to feed whatever's needed. I really wish I had that on my plane. It would have made adding the ADS600B a lot easier. The problem is finding a connector with enough pins! Dave Saylor AirCrafters 140 Aviation Way Watsonville, CA 95076 831-722-9141 Shop 831-750-0284 Cell On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 1:04 PM, RV Builder (Michael Sausen) wrote: > Being a big fan of peer reviewed eye charts I thought I would throw my > data/audio diagrams for my panel out to the group and see if anyone had a ny > comments or thoughts on it. =C2-=C2-The first page just shows who is talking to > who, the following pages are just a device view, and then there are two > block diagrams near the end that show the connections between all the > devices. > > > Michael ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Ameri-King AK-450 vs ACK E-10 Remote Control Panel...
From: "Bob Turner" <bobturner(at)alum.rpi.edu>
Date: Oct 10, 2011
My only suggestion would be to put an ohmmeter on each terminal of each remote unit and see if you can discern the functions as you push the buttons. If it's something as simple as "wire 1 on unit A does the same thing as wire 2 on unit B, etc" then you can cut and splice the cable to send wire 1's signal down wire 2, etc. A more deluxe solution would be a small remote box with 2 RJ connectors on it, with the wiring cross-overs done internally. -------- Bob Turner RV-10 QB Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=354579#354579 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Bob Leffler" <rv(at)thelefflers.com>
Subject: Plane Power and Lycoming Pulley Alignment Issue
Date: Oct 10, 2011
I've been talking with Dick Carmichael at Plane Power about an alignment issue on my RV-10 between the pulley on the Plane Power 60a alternator and the pulley that came with my IO-540-D4A5, which were both purchased through Van's. I've attached a photo for review. In the photo, I've also placed a square against the back of the Lycoming pulley. As you can plainly see the alternator belt is out of alignment. In talking with Dick, he stated that this is due to the dual belted pulley that came with my engine. He further stated that he couldn't guarantee that the belt would stay on and it clearly would have a shortened life due to the misalignment. Since there are no user adjustments for this alignment with the Boss mount, I'm being told by Plane Power to use a single belt pulley on the engine. Is this the standard pulley for an IO-540-D4A5? Plane Power is giving me the indication that this is not the case. Is there the possibility that the incorrect part was substituted by Lycoming? Has anyone else run into this problem? If so, what did you do? Thanks, bob ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Plane Power and Lycoming Pulley Alignment Issue
From: "Bob Turner" <bobturner(at)alum.rpi.edu>
Date: Oct 10, 2011
I have the YIO-540D4A5 (no certification paperwork) bought thru Vans, and it came with a single belt pulley. I have found Williamsport to be very accomodating; my engine came with a light weight starter and I requested it be changed to the heavier unit (per the starter company's recommendation) and Lycoming immediately sent one to me. I'd ask them for the correct pulley. Bob -------- Bob Turner RV-10 QB Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=354585#354585 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Deems Davis" <deemsdavis(at)cox.net>
Subject: Plane Power and Lycoming Pulley Alignment Issue
Date: Oct 10, 2011
Bob, Why do you have a dual belt prop pulley? The standard pulley is a single belt. The only reason I'm aware of for having a dual belt is to accommodate an A/C compressor. For those installations w/ A/C they have been relocating the alternator to the other side of the engine and placing the compressor where the old alternator was? Deems From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Bob Leffler Sent: Monday, October 10, 2011 2:37 PM Subject: RV10-List: Plane Power and Lycoming Pulley Alignment Issue I've been talking with Dick Carmichael at Plane Power about an alignment issue on my RV-10 between the pulley on the Plane Power 60a alternator and the pulley that came with my IO-540-D4A5, which were both purchased through Van's. I've attached a photo for review. In the photo, I've also placed a square against the back of the Lycoming pulley. As you can plainly see the alternator belt is out of alignment. In talking with Dick, he stated that this is due to the dual belted pulley that came with my engine. He further stated that he couldn't guarantee that the belt would stay on and it clearly would have a shortened life due to the misalignment. Since there are no user adjustments for this alignment with the Boss mount, I'm being told by Plane Power to use a single belt pulley on the engine. Is this the standard pulley for an IO-540-D4A5? Plane Power is giving me the indication that this is not the case. Is there the possibility that the incorrect part was substituted by Lycoming? Has anyone else run into this problem? If so, what did you do? Thanks, bob ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Bob Leffler" <rv(at)thelefflers.com>
Subject: Plane Power and Lycoming Pulley Alignment Issue
Date: Oct 10, 2011
That's what Lycoming shipped when I ordered the engine through Van's. It wasn't an option that I chose. Gus at Van's stated that is what Lycoming now ships on the YIO-540-D4A5. However, I know of at least two other folks that got the single pulley. Gus stated that Lycoming would swap it out for me. bob From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Deems Davis Sent: Monday, October 10, 2011 6:40 PM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Plane Power and Lycoming Pulley Alignment Issue Bob, Why do you have a dual belt prop pulley? The standard pulley is a single belt. The only reason I'm aware of for having a dual belt is to accommodate an A/C compressor. For those installations w/ A/C they have been relocating the alternator to the other side of the engine and placing the compressor where the old alternator was? Deems From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Bob Leffler Sent: Monday, October 10, 2011 2:37 PM Subject: RV10-List: Plane Power and Lycoming Pulley Alignment Issue I've been talking with Dick Carmichael at Plane Power about an alignment issue on my RV-10 between the pulley on the Plane Power 60a alternator and the pulley that came with my IO-540-D4A5, which were both purchased through Van's. I've attached a photo for review. In the photo, I've also placed a square against the back of the Lycoming pulley. As you can plainly see the alternator belt is out of alignment. In talking with Dick, he stated that this is due to the dual belted pulley that came with my engine. He further stated that he couldn't guarantee that the belt would stay on and it clearly would have a shortened life due to the misalignment. Since there are no user adjustments for this alignment with the Boss mount, I'm being told by Plane Power to use a single belt pulley on the engine. Is this the standard pulley for an IO-540-D4A5? Plane Power is giving me the indication that this is not the case. Is there the possibility that the incorrect part was substituted by Lycoming? Has anyone else run into this problem? If so, what did you do? Thanks, bob ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 10, 2011
From: Matt Dralle <dralle(at)matronics.com>
Subject: Re: Ameri-King AK-450 vs ACK E-10 Remote Control Panel...
I just got an email back from ACK Tech and they said: "To use the Ameriking remote you must cut one end off the cable and turn it 180 degrees. - Mike Akatiff, ACK Technologies" Simple enough! Yahoo! Matt Dralle At 09:53 AM 10/10/2011 Monday, you wrote: > > >Greetings Listers, > >I have an RV-6 with an ACK E-01 ELT unit and the small Remote Control Panel (RCP) unit. Last month, I completely replaced the instrument panel in the airplane and when I removed the ELT's RCP, I noticed that one of the mounting holes was broken off. > >I had another ELT on the shelf for another project and so I grabbed the RCP from it and designed a hole in the new instrument panel for it. The hole for this RCP was about twice the height of the hole for the RCP from the E-01 but appeared to be exactly the same as far as make and connector hole. > >Well, I didn't really put two and two together at the time but the E-01 is from ACK Technologies, and the RCP from the other unit is an Ameri-King AK-450. Except for the difference in vertical size the two RCP's look exactly the same and accept the same RJ-11 connector. Both have a Red and a Black button and a single Red LED. Both take a 3 volt battery. > >But here's the bummer, after I put everything back together this weekend, it turns out that the new RCP will NOT turn the E-01 on/off. If I plug the original E-01 RCP in to the same RJ-11 wire, it does turn the E-01 on/off, so the wiring and E-01 are fine. It just seems that the internal wiring of the two different RCP's is slightly different. > >The bigger bummer is that now I have a large hole in my panel for the RCP that doesn't work, so I have to figure something out. The original-sized RCP won't fit because its too small and the panel hole is too big. > >Can anyone lend any advice on the situation? Surely others have run into this before. > >Thanks! > >Matt Dralle - Matt "Red Dawg" Dralle RV-8 #82880 N998RV "Ruby Vixen" http://www.mattsrv8.com - Matt's Complete RV-8 Construction Log http://www.mattsrv8.com/Mishap - Landing Mishap Rebuild Log http://www.youtube.com/MattsRV8 - Matt's RV-8 HDTV YouTube Channel Status: 170+ Hours TTSN - Rebuilding Fuselage After Landing Mishap... ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Deems Davis" <deemsdavis(at)cox.net>
Subject: Plane Power and Lycoming Pulley Alignment Issue
Date: Oct 10, 2011
Did you get a parts/o-haul manual with your engine? I'll bet it doesn't list a dual belt as standard. Go for the exchange. It's disappointing to hear Van's give crappy advice/info. Deems You might want to see what a single pulley flywheel goes for, and sell the dual pulley, When I ws considering A/C and looking for a dual pulley, it was going to cost me $1200. From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Bob Leffler Sent: Monday, October 10, 2011 4:02 PM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Plane Power and Lycoming Pulley Alignment Issue That's what Lycoming shipped when I ordered the engine through Van's. It wasn't an option that I chose. Gus at Van's stated that is what Lycoming now ships on the YIO-540-D4A5. However, I know of at least two other folks that got the single pulley. Gus stated that Lycoming would swap it out for me. bob From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Deems Davis Sent: Monday, October 10, 2011 6:40 PM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Plane Power and Lycoming Pulley Alignment Issue Bob, Why do you have a dual belt prop pulley? The standard pulley is a single belt. The only reason I'm aware of for having a dual belt is to accommodate an A/C compressor. For those installations w/ A/C they have been relocating the alternator to the other side of the engine and placing the compressor where the old alternator was? Deems From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Bob Leffler Sent: Monday, October 10, 2011 2:37 PM Subject: RV10-List: Plane Power and Lycoming Pulley Alignment Issue I've been talking with Dick Carmichael at Plane Power about an alignment issue on my RV-10 between the pulley on the Plane Power 60a alternator and the pulley that came with my IO-540-D4A5, which were both purchased through Van's. I've attached a photo for review. In the photo, I've also placed a square against the back of the Lycoming pulley. As you can plainly see the alternator belt is out of alignment. In talking with Dick, he stated that this is due to the dual belted pulley that came with my engine. He further stated that he couldn't guarantee that the belt would stay on and it clearly would have a shortened life due to the misalignment. Since there are no user adjustments for this alignment with the Boss mount, I'm being told by Plane Power to use a single belt pulley on the engine. Is this the standard pulley for an IO-540-D4A5? Plane Power is giving me the indication that this is not the case. Is there the possibility that the incorrect part was substituted by Lycoming? Has anyone else run into this problem? If so, what did you do? Thanks, bob http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List http://forums.matronics.com http://www.matronics.com/contribution ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Plane Power and Lycoming Pulley Alignment Issue
From: Jesse Saint <jesse(at)saintaviation.com>
Date: Oct 10, 2011
That definitely is not right. I've never seen that problem before. Could the alternator bracket is really to only variable that I can think of. Can you g et some measurements off that and have people on the list compare? As Deems said, I have only seen the dual belt pulley used w A/C, although in the most recent installation I have seen the compressor was on the left sid e and the alternator stayed on the right. That was an RDD installation of th e Flightline A/C system. I think somehow your alternator bracket is wrong. Jesse Saint I-TEC, Inc. jesse(at)itecusa.org www.itecusa.org www.mavericklsa.com C: 352-427-0285 O: 352-465-4545 F: 815-377-3694 Sent from my iPhone On Oct 10, 2011, at 5:36 PM, "Bob Leffler" wrote: > I=99ve been talking with Dick Carmichael at Plane Power about an ali gnment issue on my RV-10 between the pulley on the Plane Power 60a alternato r and the pulley that came with my IO-540-D4A5, which were both purchased th rough Van=99s. I=99ve attached a photo for review. In the phot o, I=99ve also placed a square against the back of the Lycoming pulley . > > > > As you can plainly see the alternator belt is out of alignment. In talkin g with Dick, he stated that this is due to the dual belted pulley that came w ith my engine. He further stated that he couldn=99t guarantee that th e belt would stay on and it clearly would have a shortened life due to the m isalignment. > > > > Since there are no user adjustments for this alignment with the Boss mount , I=99m being told by Plane Power to use a single belt pulley on the e ngine. > > > > Is this the standard pulley for an IO-540-D4A5? Plane Power is giving me the indication that this is not the case. Is there the possibility that th e incorrect part was substituted by Lycoming? > > > > Has anyone else run into this problem? If so, what did you do? > > > > Thanks, > > > > bob > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Jesse Saint <jesse(at)saintaviation.com>
Subject: Off-List: Plane Power and Lycoming Pulley Alignment Issue
Date: Oct 10, 2011
I'll trade you a single pulley ring gear for the double pulley one if you want. I'll ship ahead to verify that it will fit, but I'd be happy to trade. As Deems said, it's not a cheap thing to buy, so working out a swap would be much better in the long run. Jesse Saint Saint Aviation, Inc. jesse(at)saintaviation.com C: 352-427-0285 F: 815-377-3694 On Oct 10, 2011, at 7:02 PM, Bob Leffler wrote: > That=92s what Lycoming shipped when I ordered the engine through Van=92s. It wasn=92t an option that I chose. > > Gus at Van=92s stated that is what Lycoming now ships on the YIO-540-D4A5. However, I know of at least two other folks that got the single pulley. Gus stated that Lycoming would swap it out for me. > > bob > > From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Deems Davis > Sent: Monday, October 10, 2011 6:40 PM > To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: RE: RV10-List: Plane Power and Lycoming Pulley Alignment Issue > > Bob, Why do you have a dual belt prop pulley? The standard pulley is a single belt. The only reason I=92m aware of for having a dual belt is to accommodate an A/C compressor. For those installations w/ A/C they have been relocating the alternator to the other side of the engine and placing the compressor where the old alternator was? > > Deems > > From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Bob Leffler > Sent: Monday, October 10, 2011 2:37 PM > To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: RV10-List: Plane Power and Lycoming Pulley Alignment Issue > > I=92ve been talking with Dick Carmichael at Plane Power about an alignment issue on my RV-10 between the pulley on the Plane Power 60a alternator and the pulley that came with my IO-540-D4A5, which were both purchased through Van=92s. I=92ve attached a photo for review. In the photo, I=92ve also placed a square against the back of the Lycoming pulley. > > As you can plainly see the alternator belt is out of alignment. In talking with Dick, he stated that this is due to the dual belted pulley that came with my engine. He further stated that he couldn=92t guarantee that the belt would stay on and it clearly would have a shortened life due to the misalignment. > > Since there are no user adjustments for this alignment with the Boss mount, I=92m being told by Plane Power to use a single belt pulley on the engine. > > Is this the standard pulley for an IO-540-D4A5? Plane Power is giving me the indication that this is not the case. Is there the possibility that the incorrect part was substituted by Lycoming? > > Has anyone else run into this problem? If so, what did you do? > > Thanks, > > bob > > > http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List > http://forums.matronics.com > http://www.matronics.com/contribution > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Plane Power and Lycoming Pulley Alignment Issue
From: "rv10flyer" <wayne.gillispie(at)yahoo.com>
Date: Oct 10, 2011
This change of std pulley shipment started fall 2010 or before. I have the same dual groove/pp setup as Bob. Not only are the pulleys out of alignment fore-aft, PP's bracket has the pulley/flywheel not in the same plane. Very unacceptable engineering and lack of communication between Vans/Lyc/PP. -------- Wayne Gillispie, A&P 5/93, PPC 10/08 Bldr# 40983SB Baffles then fuel/oil/exhaust. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=354610#354610 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: 2 IO-540-C4B5 engines for sale
From: "b432291" <mooney.faq(at)cox.net>
Date: Oct 10, 2011
I currently have O-360 engine parts at Chuck Ney's shop in Tulsa for assembly into a full engine for the RV-7A I am building. Because I wanted to see the shop for myself I visited Chuck and was impressed with his shop and his aircraft engine knowledge. Because Chuck is less knowledgeable about computers than engines, he asked me to "list" 2 IO-540 engines he has for sale. Both engines are out of a Piper Aztec. Engine #1 has been freshly overhauled by Chuck and has his Signature Modifications, 6 "Straight Bore" Investment Cast Millennium Cylinders (500 hours TT before Reconditioned/Straight Bored) and Ney Nozzles for Camshaft Lubrication. This engine has a replaced crankcase, as the original was cracked. Ignition is new mags. All other accessories have 500 hours since last rebuild. You get prop-governor, alternator, fuel injector system, lightweight starter, & vacuum pump. Note that Chuck does not recommend mineral oil for Straight Bore break-in and believes this motor will gain 15 HP from the Straight Bore cylinders. Chuck is asking $36,000 for this engine. Engine #2 is in a as-removed condition from the Aztec. All parts are 500 hours since overhaul. Chuck has not inspected, overhauled, or modified anything on this engine. It comes with the same accessory list as Engine #1. Chuck is asking $15,000 for this engine. Please contact Chuck Ney Enterprises about either of these engines: Chuck Ney Chuck Ney Enterprises Inc. 9410 East 46th Street North Tulsa, Ok. 74117 918-836-5323 Work 918-625-3193 Cell 918-836-4627 Fax Ted Saylor Vans RV-7A under construction Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=354618#354618 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Plane Power and Lycoming Pulley Alignment Issue
From: "greghale" <ghale5224(at)aol.com>
Date: Oct 10, 2011
I have the dual flywheel pulley on my rv10 because I have air conditioning. The Plane Power pulley was way off when I first installed it. I had to make a different spacer and mount the alternator on the back side of the bracket to get the belt in alignment. If you are interested in pictures, let me know. I will have my cowling off next week. The alternator is mounted on the right side of the engine (per Vans) and the compressor is mounted on the left side. Greg... -------- Greg Hale rv10 -- N210KH www.nwacaptain.com Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=354625#354625 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Can Weld-on or any other plexiglass bonding agent be purcha
From: "greghale" <ghale5224(at)aol.com>
Date: Oct 10, 2011
I used Sikaflex when I replaced my windshield. It is a lot easier to use and clean up is a snap. http://www.nwacaptain.com/windshield.html Greg... -------- Greg Hale rv10 -- N210KH www.nwacaptain.com Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=354626#354626 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Bob Leffler" <rv(at)thelefflers.com>
Subject: Plane Power and Lycoming Pulley Alignment Issue
Date: Oct 11, 2011
Putting together comments from several people, it appears that Van=99s and Lycoming made this change about two years ago. The comment that I got was Van=99s was that most of their engines are going to Brazil and they use a/c. Somebody made an executive decision and didn=99t inform Plane Power. In talking to them, they are very anxious to solve this problem, but appeared to be caught off guard. I guess folks are modifying brackets and spacers themselves. From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Jesse Saint Sent: Monday, October 10, 2011 7:51 PM Subject: Re: RV10-List: Plane Power and Lycoming Pulley Alignment Issue That definitely is not right. I've never seen that problem before. Could the alternator bracket is really to only variable that I can think of. Can you get some measurements off that and have people on the list compare? As Deems said, I have only seen the dual belt pulley used w A/C, although in the most recent installation I have seen the compressor was on the left side and the alternator stayed on the right. That was an RDD installation of the Flightline A/C system. I think somehow your alternator bracket is wrong. Jesse Saint I-TEC, Inc. jesse(at)itecusa.org www.itecusa.org www.mavericklsa.com C: 352-427-0285 O: 352-465-4545 F: 815-377-3694 Sent from my iPhone On Oct 10, 2011, at 5:36 PM, "Bob Leffler" wrote: I=99ve been talking with Dick Carmichael at Plane Power about an alignment issue on my RV-10 between the pulley on the Plane Power 60a alternator and the pulley that came with my IO-540-D4A5, which were both purchased through Van=99s. I=99ve attached a photo for review. In the photo, I=99ve also placed a square against the back of the Lycoming pulley. As you can plainly see the alternator belt is out of alignment. In talking with Dick, he stated that this is due to the dual belted pulley that came with my engine. He further stated that he couldn=99t guarantee that the belt would stay on and it clearly would have a shortened life due to the misalignment. Since there are no user adjustments for this alignment with the Boss mount, I=99m being told by Plane Power to use a single belt pulley on the engine. Is this the standard pulley for an IO-540-D4A5? Plane Power is giving me the indication that this is not the case. Is there the possibility that the incorrect part was substituted by Lycoming? Has anyone else run into this problem? If so, what did you do? Thanks, bob ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Jesse Saint <jesse(at)saintaviation.com>
Subject: Re: Plane Power and Lycoming Pulley Alignment Issue
Date: Oct 11, 2011
I installed a dual-pulley ring gear with a standard Plane Power alternator and it lined up perfectly. I wonder what the difference could be. Jesse Saint Saint Aviation, Inc. jesse(at)saintaviation.com C: 352-427-0285 F: 815-377-3694 On Oct 11, 2011, at 6:22 AM, Bob Leffler wrote: > Putting together comments from several people, it appears that Van=92s and Lycoming made this change about two years ago. The comment that I got was Van=92s was that most of their engines are going to Brazil and they use a/c. Somebody made an executive decision and didn=92t inform Plane Power. In talking to them, they are very anxious to solve this problem, but appeared to be caught off guard. I guess folks are modifying brackets and spacers themselves. > > From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Jesse Saint > Sent: Monday, October 10, 2011 7:51 PM > To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: Re: RV10-List: Plane Power and Lycoming Pulley Alignment Issue > > That definitely is not right. I've never seen that problem before. Could the alternator bracket is really to only variable that I can think of. Can you get some measurements off that and have people on the list compare? > > As Deems said, I have only seen the dual belt pulley used w A/C, although in the most recent installation I have seen the compressor was on the left side and the alternator stayed on the right. That was an RDD installation of the Flightline A/C system. > > I think somehow your alternator bracket is wrong. > > Jesse Saint > I-TEC, Inc. > jesse(at)itecusa.org > www.itecusa.org > www.mavericklsa.com > C: 352-427-0285 > O: 352-465-4545 > F: 815-377-3694 > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Oct 10, 2011, at 5:36 PM, "Bob Leffler" wrote: > > I=92ve been talking with Dick Carmichael at Plane Power about an alignment issue on my RV-10 between the pulley on the Plane Power 60a alternator and the pulley that came with my IO-540-D4A5, which were both purchased through Van=92s. I=92ve attached a photo for review. In the photo, I=92ve also placed a square against the back of the Lycoming pulley. > > As you can plainly see the alternator belt is out of alignment. In talking with Dick, he stated that this is due to the dual belted pulley that came with my engine. He further stated that he couldn=92t guarantee that the belt would stay on and it clearly would have a shortened life due to the misalignment. > > Since there are no user adjustments for this alignment with the Boss mount, I=92m being told by Plane Power to use a single belt pulley on the engine. > > Is this the standard pulley for an IO-540-D4A5? Plane Power is giving me the indication that this is not the case. Is there the possibility that the incorrect part was substituted by Lycoming? > > Has anyone else run into this problem? If so, what did you do? > > Thanks, > > bob > > > > http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List > http://forums.matronics.com > http://www.matronics.com/contribution > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: <capsteve(at)iflyrv10.com>
Subject: Re: Plane Power and Lycoming Pulley Alignment Issue
Date: Oct 11, 2011
Bob, Seems to me that the easiest fix would be to machine the difference from the back of the alternator pulley to bring the belt into alignment. Whether there is a spacer, or if the pulley has a one piece boss, should be easier and cheaper than hunting down a new flywheel.. Take a look, if you need it machined and don=99t have a quick resource locally , take a measurement and send it this way. (one other thought is that you may be able to flip the alt pulley if it has a boss and place an appropriate new spacer under it to correct your issues. just make sure there is enough thread on the alt shaft for the nut) (assuming it has a keyway rather than a taper ) Steve DiNieri From: Bob Leffler Sent: Monday, October 10, 2011 5:36 PM Subject: RV10-List: Plane Power and Lycoming Pulley Alignment Issue I=99ve been talking with Dick Carmichael at Plane Power about an alignment issue on my RV-10 between the pulley on the Plane Power 60a alternator and the pulley that came with my IO-540-D4A5, which were both purchased through Van=99s. I=99ve attached a photo for review. In the photo, I=99ve also placed a square against the back of the Lycoming pulley. As you can plainly see the alternator belt is out of alignment. In talking with Dick, he stated that this is due to the dual belted pulley that came with my engine. He further stated that he couldn=99t guarantee that the belt would stay on and it clearly would have a shortened life due to the misalignment. Since there are no user adjustments for this alignment with the Boss mount, I=99m being told by Plane Power to use a single belt pulley on the engine. Is this the standard pulley for an IO-540-D4A5? Plane Power is giving me the indication that this is not the case. Is there the possibility that the incorrect part was substituted by Lycoming? Has anyone else run into this problem? If so, what did you do? Thanks, bob ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Plane Power and Lycoming Pulley Alignment Issue
From: pilotdds <pilotdds(at)aol.com>
Date: Oct 11, 2011
Hey Steve what is the status of the other Iflyrv10 projects, -----Original Message----- From: capsteve <capsteve(at)iflyrv10.com> Sent: Tue, Oct 11, 2011 6:13 am Subject: Re: RV10-List: Plane Power and Lycoming Pulley Alignment Issue Bob, Seems to me that the easiest fix would be to machine the difference fro m the back of the alternator pulley to bring the belt into alignment. Whether there is a spacer, or if the pulley has a one piece boss, should be easier and cheaper than hunting down a new flywheel.. Take a look, if you need it machined and don=99t have a quick resourc e locally , take a measurement and send it this way. (one other thought is that you may be able to flip the alt pulley if it ha s a boss and place an appropriate new spacer under it to correct your issue s. just make sure there is enough thread on the alt shaft for the nut) (assumi ng it has a keyway rather than a taper ) Steve DiNieri From: Bob Leffler Sent: Monday, October 10, 2011 5:36 PM Subject: RV10-List: Plane Power and Lycoming Pulley Alignment Issue I=99ve been talking with Dick Carmichael at Plane Power about an alig nment issue on my RV-10 between the pulley on the Plane Power 60a alternato r and the pulley that came with my IO-540-D4A5, which were both purchased t hrough Van=99s. I=99ve attached a photo for review. In the ph oto, I=99ve also placed a square against the back of the Lycoming pul ley. As you can plainly see the alternator belt is out of alignment. In talking with Dick, he stated that this is due to the dual belted pulley that came with my engine. He further stated that he couldn=99t guarantee that the belt would stay on and it clearly would have a shortened life due to th e misalignment. Since there are no user adjustments for this alignment with the Boss mount, I=99m being told by Plane Power to use a single belt pulley on the e ngine. Is this the standard pulley for an IO-540-D4A5? Plane Power is giving me the indication that this is not the case. Is there the possibility that th e incorrect part was substituted by Lycoming? Has anyone else run into this problem? If so, what did you do? Thanks, bob -= - The RV10-List Email Forum - -= Use the Matronics List Features Navigator to browse -= the many List utilities such as List Un/Subscription, -= Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, -= Photoshare, and much much more: - -= --> http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List - -======================== -= - MATRONICS WEB FORUMS - -= Same great content also available via the Web Forums! - -= --> http://forums.matronics.com - -======================== -= - List Contribution Web Site - -= Thank you for your generous support! -= -Matt Dralle, List Admin. -= --> http://www.matronics.com/contribution -======================== ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Plane Power and Lycoming Pulley Alignment Issue
From: "rv10flyer" <wayne.gillispie(at)yahoo.com>
Date: Oct 11, 2011
Machining the pulley may be an option after engineering approval from PP. I would not want to weaken the pulley too much. While waiting for all of this to get hashed out I am going to pull the rear spacer and machine it down approx .120 then add two 7/16" AN washers to front spacer. Also I am going to straighten tension arm. Once PP comes up with a fix I can swap out the parts. -------- Wayne Gillispie, A&P 5/93, PPC 10/08 Bldr# 40983SB Final assembly, aw cert, transition training with David Maib. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=354674#354674 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Plane Power and Lycoming Pulley Alignment Issue
From: "rleffler" <rv(at)thelefflers.com>
Date: Oct 11, 2011
So I have had conversations with Vans, Lycoming, and Plane Power. Vans passed the buck even though they made the change to go with the dual pulley flywheel about two years ago from what I can tell. In talking with Lycoming, they were unaware of the issue with the Plane Power alternator not aligning with the dual pulley flywheel. It has been escalated to their engineering department and I'm awaiting a response from them at the moment. The mentioned that 2/3's of the YIO-540s sold to Vans are going to Brazil. Plane Power states that there alternator will not align with the dual pulley flywheel from Lycoming. They are anxious to resolve this issue. Both Vans and Lycoming are big customers of theirs. They were going to call both Vans and Lycoming today to discuss the details. (Jesse they were curious as to how you got your's to align without modification) At the moment, there appears to be two solutions. 1. Van's must indicate an option to choose whether or not you need a single or dual pulley flywheel. 2. Plane Power must fabricate a new bracket for the dual pulley flywheel. Both Lycoming and Plan Power seemed frustrated since Van's only wants to order a single sku from them. It appears that Van's made this change, but didn't coordinate with both company's engineering departments to ensure that everything worked. At this point in time, I'm awaiting responses from all three vendors to see how the choose to resolve this issue. I'll keep everyone posted. bob -------- Bob Leffler N410BL - FWF RV-10 #40684 http://mykitlog.com/rleffler Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=354679#354679 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Plane Power and Lycoming Pulley Alignment Issue
From: Michael Kraus <n223rv(at)wolflakeairport.net>
Date: Oct 11, 2011
I had a dual pulley, but couldn't use it with the Lightspeed ignition circuit board, it would not fit under the flywheel. So may be something to consider if you are going the Lightspeed route..... Unless the newer flywheels are bigger?? -Mike Kraus RV-10, Flying Sent from my iPhone On Oct 11, 2011, at 11:32 AM, "rleffler" wrote: > > So I have had conversations with Vans, Lycoming, and Plane Power. > > Vans passed the buck even though they made the change to go with the dual pulley flywheel about two years ago from what I can tell. > > In talking with Lycoming, they were unaware of the issue with the Plane Power alternator not aligning with the dual pulley flywheel. It has been escalated to their engineering department and I'm awaiting a response from them at the moment. The mentioned that 2/3's of the YIO-540s sold to Vans are going to Brazil. > > Plane Power states that there alternator will not align with the dual pulley flywheel from Lycoming. They are anxious to resolve this issue. Both Vans and Lycoming are big customers of theirs. They were going to call both Vans and Lycoming today to discuss the details. (Jesse they were curious as to how you got your's to align without modification) > > At the moment, there appears to be two solutions. > > 1. Van's must indicate an option to choose whether or not you need a single or dual pulley flywheel. > 2. Plane Power must fabricate a new bracket for the dual pulley flywheel. > > Both Lycoming and Plan Power seemed frustrated since Van's only wants to order a single sku from them. It appears that Van's made this change, but didn't coordinate with both company's engineering departments to ensure that everything worked. > > At this point in time, I'm awaiting responses from all three vendors to see how the choose to resolve this issue. I'll keep everyone posted. > > bob > > -------- > Bob Leffler > N410BL - FWF > RV-10 #40684 > http://mykitlog.com/rleffler > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=354679#354679 > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Strain" <aircarepros(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Plane Power and Lycoming Pulley Alignment Issue
Date: Oct 11, 2011
John at Flightline here. The best PMA part for a dual groove pulley is the LW-10184. It retains the original groove from the Lyco 540 10" pulley, as well as adds the one we need for ac. I can't speak to the alternator alignment as there are so many, but I haven't heard any complaints about the belt alignment of the Plane Power or the B&C until this thread. We have had numerous instances where people have thought that they were being sold a dual groove pulley with their engine only to find out that it was a trim groove, not a belt groove to shave weight from the pulley. You might be looking at such a situation here also. The true 2 groove pulleys are exactly the same at the bottom of the groove. The single with the shaved groove is different and typically places the belt right up against the body of the ring gear support. The fore mentioned 2 groove (LW-10184) is ideal for lightspeed acceptance also. -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Michael Kraus Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 9:37 AM Subject: Re: RV10-List: Re: Plane Power and Lycoming Pulley Alignment Issue I had a dual pulley, but couldn't use it with the Lightspeed ignition circuit board, it would not fit under the flywheel. So may be something to consider if you are going the Lightspeed route..... Unless the newer flywheels are bigger?? -Mike Kraus RV-10, Flying Sent from my iPhone On Oct 11, 2011, at 11:32 AM, "rleffler" wrote: > > So I have had conversations with Vans, Lycoming, and Plane Power. > > Vans passed the buck even though they made the change to go with the dual pulley flywheel about two years ago from what I can tell. > > In talking with Lycoming, they were unaware of the issue with the Plane Power alternator not aligning with the dual pulley flywheel. It has been escalated to their engineering department and I'm awaiting a response from them at the moment. The mentioned that 2/3's of the YIO-540s sold to Vans are going to Brazil. > > Plane Power states that there alternator will not align with the dual pulley flywheel from Lycoming. They are anxious to resolve this issue. Both Vans and Lycoming are big customers of theirs. They were going to call both Vans and Lycoming today to discuss the details. (Jesse they were curious as to how you got your's to align without modification) > > At the moment, there appears to be two solutions. > > 1. Van's must indicate an option to choose whether or not you need a single or dual pulley flywheel. > 2. Plane Power must fabricate a new bracket for the dual pulley flywheel. > > Both Lycoming and Plan Power seemed frustrated since Van's only wants to order a single sku from them. It appears that Van's made this change, but didn't coordinate with both company's engineering departments to ensure that everything worked. > > At this point in time, I'm awaiting responses from all three vendors to see how the choose to resolve this issue. I'll keep everyone posted. > > bob > > -------- > Bob Leffler > N410BL - FWF > RV-10 #40684 > http://mykitlog.com/rleffler > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=354679#354679 > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Plane Power and Lycoming Pulley Alignment Issue
From: Jesse Saint <jesse(at)saintaviation.com>
Date: Oct 11, 2011
That's the one that I installed. Jesse Saint Saint Aviation, Inc. jesse(at)saintaviation.com C: 352-427-0285 F: 815-377-3694 On Oct 11, 2011, at 1:04 PM, John Strain wrote: > > John at Flightline here. The best PMA part for a dual groove pulley is the > LW-10184. It retains the original groove from the Lyco 540 10" pulley, as > well as adds the one we need for ac. I can't speak to the alternator > alignment as there are so many, but I haven't heard any complaints about the > belt alignment of the Plane Power or the B&C until this thread. We have had > numerous instances where people have thought that they were being sold a > dual groove pulley with their engine only to find out that it was a trim > groove, not a belt groove to shave weight from the pulley. You might be > looking at such a situation here also. The true 2 groove pulleys are > exactly the same at the bottom of the groove. The single with the shaved > groove is different and typically places the belt right up against the body > of the ring gear support. > > The fore mentioned 2 groove (LW-10184) is ideal for lightspeed acceptance > also. > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com > [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Michael Kraus > Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 9:37 AM > To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: Re: RV10-List: Re: Plane Power and Lycoming Pulley Alignment Issue > > > I had a dual pulley, but couldn't use it with the Lightspeed ignition > circuit board, it would not fit under the flywheel. So may be something to > consider if you are going the Lightspeed route..... Unless the newer > flywheels are bigger?? > -Mike Kraus > RV-10, Flying > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Oct 11, 2011, at 11:32 AM, "rleffler" wrote: > >> >> So I have had conversations with Vans, Lycoming, and Plane Power. >> >> Vans passed the buck even though they made the change to go with the dual > pulley flywheel about two years ago from what I can tell. >> >> In talking with Lycoming, they were unaware of the issue with the Plane > Power alternator not aligning with the dual pulley flywheel. It has been > escalated to their engineering department and I'm awaiting a response from > them at the moment. The mentioned that 2/3's of the YIO-540s sold to Vans > are going to Brazil. >> >> Plane Power states that there alternator will not align with the dual > pulley flywheel from Lycoming. They are anxious to resolve this issue. > Both Vans and Lycoming are big customers of theirs. They were going to call > both Vans and Lycoming today to discuss the details. (Jesse they were > curious as to how you got your's to align without modification) >> >> At the moment, there appears to be two solutions. >> >> 1. Van's must indicate an option to choose whether or not you need a > single or dual pulley flywheel. >> 2. Plane Power must fabricate a new bracket for the dual pulley flywheel. >> >> Both Lycoming and Plan Power seemed frustrated since Van's only wants to > order a single sku from them. It appears that Van's made this change, but > didn't coordinate with both company's engineering departments to ensure that > everything worked. >> >> At this point in time, I'm awaiting responses from all three vendors to > see how the choose to resolve this issue. I'll keep everyone posted. >> >> bob >> >> -------- >> Bob Leffler >> N410BL - FWF >> RV-10 #40684 >> http://mykitlog.com/rleffler >> >> >> >> >> Read this topic online here: >> >> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=354679#354679 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Plane Power and Lycoming Pulley Alignment Issue
From: "rv10flyer" <wayne.gillispie(at)yahoo.com>
Date: Oct 11, 2011
Mine is LW-12227. The fwd groove is a vee shape and the rear is a u shape. Maybe just for reducing weight but the rear u shaped groove is approx .120" aft of PP alt pulley groove. -------- Wayne Gillispie, A&P 5/93, PPC 10/08 Bldr# 40983SB Final assembly, aw cert, transition training with David Maib. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=354701#354701 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Plane Power and Lycoming Pulley Alignment Issue
From: "rv10flyer" <wayne.gillispie(at)yahoo.com>
Date: Oct 11, 2011
O.D. of my pulley is approx 9" and I had to purchase a Gates 7328 belt to fit. -------- Wayne Gillispie, A&P 5/93, PPC 10/08 Bldr# 40983SB Final assembly, aw cert, transition training with David Maib. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=354702#354702 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Strain" <aircarepros(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Plane Power and Lycoming Pulley Alignment Issue
Date: Oct 11, 2011
Sounds like a bracket adjustment/reconfig is in order then. Pretty sure that the 12227 is only a single groove. I have a 12226 here and it is definitely a single posing as a 2 groove. I'd be interested in knowing if the B&C is better aligned with that ring gear, or if the change in the drive pulley is what is causing the mis-alignments. There used to be no difference in at least these two alternator offsets. -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of rv10flyer Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 10:26 AM Subject: RV10-List: Re: Plane Power and Lycoming Pulley Alignment Issue Mine is LW-12227. The fwd groove is a vee shape and the rear is a u shape. Maybe just for reducing weight but the rear u shaped groove is approx .120" aft of PP alt pulley groove. -------- Wayne Gillispie, A&P 5/93, PPC 10/08 Bldr# 40983SB Final assembly, aw cert, transition training with David Maib. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=354701#354701 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 11, 2011
Subject: Re: Plane Power and Lycoming Pulley Alignment Issue
From: Jim Combs <jiminlexky(at)gmail.com>
Machine the spacers NOT the pulley(s). On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 9:09 AM, wrote: > Bob, > Seems to me that the easiest fix would be to machine the difference > from the back of the alternator pulley to bring the belt into alignment. > Whether there is a spacer, or if the pulley has a one piece boss, should be > easier and cheaper than hunting down a new flywheel.. > Take a look, if you need it machined and don=92t have a quick resource > locally , take a measurement and send it this way. > > (one other thought is that you may be able to flip the alt pulley if it > has a boss and place an appropriate new spacer under it to correct your > issues. > just make sure there is enough thread on the alt shaft for the nut) > (assuming it has a keyway rather than a taper ) > > Steve DiNieri > > > *From:* Bob Leffler > *Sent:* Monday, October 10, 2011 5:36 PM > *To:* rv10-list(at)matronics.com > *Subject:* RV10-List: Plane Power and Lycoming Pulley Alignment Issue > > > I=92ve been talking with Dick Carmichael at Plane Power about an alignmen t > issue on my RV-10 between the pulley on the Plane Power 60a alternator an d > the pulley that came with my IO-540-D4A5, which were both purchased throu gh > Van=92s. I=92ve attached a photo for review. In the photo, I=92ve also placed a > square against the back of the Lycoming pulley.**** > > **** > > As you can plainly see the alternator belt is out of alignment. In talki ng > with Dick, he stated that this is due to the dual belted pulley that came > with my engine. He further stated that he couldn=92t guarantee that the belt > would stay on and it clearly would have a shortened life due to the > misalignment.**** > > **** > > Since there are no user adjustments for this alignment with the Boss moun t, > I=92m being told by Plane Power to use a single belt pulley on the engine .** > ** > > **** > > Is this the standard pulley for an IO-540-D4A5? Plane Power is giving m e > the indication that this is not the case. Is there the possibility that the > incorrect part was substituted by Lycoming?**** > > **** > > Has anyone else run into this problem? If so, what did you do?**** > > **** > > Thanks,**** > > **** > > bob**** > > * > =========== =========== =========== =========== > * > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Bob Leffler" <rv(at)thelefflers.com>
Subject: Re: Plane Power and Lycoming Pulley Alignment Issue
Date: Oct 11, 2011
Nope, the LW-12227 is as Wayne described. I have the same one. I only know of one data point at the moment that has the same version of engine. He mentioned he didn't have an alignment issue with his B&C. -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of John Strain Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 1:45 PM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Re: Plane Power and Lycoming Pulley Alignment Issue Sounds like a bracket adjustment/reconfig is in order then. Pretty sure that the 12227 is only a single groove. I have a 12226 here and it is definitely a single posing as a 2 groove. I'd be interested in knowing if the B&C is better aligned with that ring gear, or if the change in the drive pulley is what is causing the mis-alignments. There used to be no difference in at least these two alternator offsets. -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of rv10flyer Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 10:26 AM Subject: RV10-List: Re: Plane Power and Lycoming Pulley Alignment Issue Mine is LW-12227. The fwd groove is a vee shape and the rear is a u shape. Maybe just for reducing weight but the rear u shaped groove is approx .120" aft of PP alt pulley groove. -------- Wayne Gillispie, A&P 5/93, PPC 10/08 Bldr# 40983SB Final assembly, aw cert, transition training with David Maib. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=354701#354701 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Plane Power and Lycoming Pulley Alignment Issue
From: Tim Olson <Tim(at)MyRV10.com>
Date: Oct 11, 2011
It wouldn't make much sense that if the big difference is the large pulley/ring gear, and by changing that part, you would only screw up one type of alternator. If the plane power and B&C had the belt in the same alignment plane before, then changing only the large pulley type should wreck the alignment of both alternators the same, unless there are some very strange other engine case factors at work. My bet is that there is a larger variation in large pulleys more than just the single and the double. Tim On Oct 11, 2011, at 6:48 PM, "Bob Leffler" wrote: > > Nope, the LW-12227 is as Wayne described. I have the same one. > > I only know of one data point at the moment that has the same version of > engine. He mentioned he didn't have an alignment issue with his B&C. > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com > [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of John Strain > Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 1:45 PM > To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: RE: RV10-List: Re: Plane Power and Lycoming Pulley Alignment Issue > > > Sounds like a bracket adjustment/reconfig is in order then. Pretty sure > that the 12227 is only a single groove. I have a 12226 here and it is > definitely a single posing as a 2 groove. I'd be interested in knowing if > the B&C is better aligned with that ring gear, or if the change in the drive > pulley is what is causing the mis-alignments. There used to be no > difference in at least these two alternator offsets. > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com > [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of rv10flyer > Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 10:26 AM > To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: RV10-List: Re: Plane Power and Lycoming Pulley Alignment Issue > > > Mine is LW-12227. The fwd groove is a vee shape and the rear is a u shape. > Maybe just for reducing weight but the rear u shaped groove is approx .120" > aft of PP alt pulley groove. > > -------- > Wayne Gillispie, A&P 5/93, PPC 10/08 Bldr# 40983SB Final assembly, aw > cert, transition training with David Maib. > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=354701#354701 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Plane Power and Lycoming Pulley Alignment Issue
From: "Lenny Iszak" <lenard(at)rapiddecision.com>
Date: Oct 11, 2011
I'm almost glad i'm not alone! :) Same thing happened to me. I ordered my engine from Vans with the dual groove ring gear because of my A/C compressor. Talked to PlanePower at OSH, and they told me to just have a machinist grind down from the spacer on one end, and use a washer on the other. Haven't done that yet, but it would be awesome if PlanePower provided the correct spacer. There may be another problem though. The dual groove ring gear i got from Lycoming had two different types of groves. One V shape and the other a V shape with a square bottom. Bill at Airflow Systems machined them to the correct shape so I can use the standard belts. The other smaller problem is that the spacers are glued together onto the alternator, which may not be so much fun to remove. If anyone finds a solution to this, please post it on here. Lenny Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=354765#354765 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Bob Leffler" <rv(at)thelefflers.com>
Subject: Re: Plane Power and Lycoming Pulley Alignment Issue
Date: Oct 12, 2011
Welcomed to the club Lenny. You are the third person that I'm aware of with this situation. We need to identify more if we can. All three vendors stated that this is new information to them. Van's made this change over a year ago, so there should be quite a few out there. Perhaps the others just machined the alternator and moved on? That's not a route I prefer to go down. I'm looking to Van's to make us whole. They specified this recent change of the flywheel without coordination with Plane Power. It would be interested to understand what the guys in Brazil are doing, since they are the reason for the change. Obviously, they aren't using Plane Power alternators. I'm also curious as to what A/C solution they are using. That second V groove belt seems problematic to me. I sent another round of photos to Lycoming last night, per their request. As I get more feedback, I'll pass it along. I may also post to VAF to see if I can attempt to identify how many of us are in this situation. Van's isn't talking at the moment. bob -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Lenny Iszak Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 11:35 PM Subject: RV10-List: Re: Plane Power and Lycoming Pulley Alignment Issue --> I'm almost glad i'm not alone! :) Same thing happened to me. I ordered my engine from Vans with the dual groove ring gear because of my A/C compressor. Talked to PlanePower at OSH, and they told me to just have a machinist grind down from the spacer on one end, and use a washer on the other. Haven't done that yet, but it would be awesome if PlanePower provided the correct spacer. There may be another problem though. The dual groove ring gear i got from Lycoming had two different types of groves. One V shape and the other a V shape with a square bottom. Bill at Airflow Systems machined them to the correct shape so I can use the standard belts. The other smaller problem is that the spacers are glued together onto the alternator, which may not be so much fun to remove. If anyone finds a solution to this, please post it on here. Lenny Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=354765#354765 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Plane Power and Lycoming Pulley Alignment Issue
From: "rleffler" <rv(at)thelefflers.com>
Date: Oct 12, 2011
I just posted this on VAF in an attempt to see how many folks are in the same situation. A little over a year or so ago, Van's had Lycoming change the flywheel to a LW-12227 to accomodate a dual belt system to support both the alternator and air conditioning. This part has the alternator belt on the rear and a V shaped groove in front for the A/C. Myself and several others that purchased a YIO-540-D4A5 and the Firewall Forward kit from Van's have noticed an alignment issue. The Plane Power 60a alternator supplied in the FWF kit from Van's has the alternator about 3/16" forward and prevents proper alignment of the belt. Plane Power has stated that none of their alternators will work with a dual belted flywheel. Van's, Plane Power, and Lycoming are currently looking into the issue, so I'm not looking for alternative or creative solutions to this situation. I'm going to let the three companies work through the engineering and come back with a resolution. What I am looking for is to identify anyone that purchased a YIO-540-D4A5 from Van's in the last two years and the answers to the following questions. 1. Do you have a LW-12227 flywheel or another part (i.e. single belted)? 2. Do you have a Plane Power alternator? 3. If you have a Plane Power alternator and a LW-12227 did you have an alignment issue? 4. If you have a LW-12227 and another brand alternator, did you have an alignment issue? The reason I'm collecting this data is all three companies apparently were caught off guard on this issue and claimed to have just heard about it. I'm skeptical that if this Van's specified configuration has been sold for over year, there have to have been others experiencing similiar issues. If not, I want to attempt to understand why? If you don't want your comments to be made public, please PM or email me. thanks, bob -------- Bob Leffler N410BL - FWF RV-10 #40684 http://mykitlog.com/rleffler Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=354789#354789 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Plane Power and Lycoming Pulley Alignment Issue
From: "dmaib(at)me.com" <dmaib(at)me.com>
Date: Oct 12, 2011
> [quote="Tim Olson"]It wouldn't make much sense that if the big difference is the large pulley/ring gear, and by changing that part, you would only screw up one type of alternator. If the plane power and B&C had the belt in the same alignment plane before, then changing only the large pulley type should wreck the alignment of both alternators the same, unless there are some very strange other engine case factors at work. > My bet is that there is a larger variation in large pulleys more than just the single and the double. > Tim > You are right about variations in the dual belt pulleys, Tim. The one I have on my C4B5 for the Flightline AC air conditioning is part number LW 10184 and was supplied by Flightline AC when I bought the AC kit. No alignment issues with a B&C that I used to have and none with the National Air Parts alternator I now have. Both grooves on my pulley are the same. BTW, I changed to the new Flightline AC mounting bracket that moves the alternator back over to the right side of the engine and puts the compressor on the left. This change was due to bearing failure in the tensioner pulleys in the old setup. -------- David Maib RV-10 #40559 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=354802#354802 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Plane Power and Lycoming Pulley Alignment Issue
From: "rleffler" <rv(at)thelefflers.com>
Date: Oct 12, 2011
I just got a call from Lycoming. They now agree that there is an alignment issue with the LW-12227 and Plane Power's 60a alternator. They are currently working with Plane Power on how to best resolve the issue. They are also reaching out to the mutual customer in Brazil to understand what alternator they are using. They asked to give them a few days to coordinate with everyone. I'll provide updates as I get them. I just wish that Van's would step up and take leadership here instead of passing the buck to Lycoming and Plane Power. bob -------- Bob Leffler N410BL - FWF RV-10 #40684 http://mykitlog.com/rleffler Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=354809#354809 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Dawson-Townsend,Timothy" <tdawson-townsend(at)aurora.aero>
Subject: Radenna SkyRadar
Date: Oct 14, 2011
Does anyone have experience with the Radenna SkyRadar ADS-B unit? Tim N52KS ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Radenna SkyRadar
From: "rv10flyer" <wayne.gillispie(at)yahoo.com>
Date: Oct 14, 2011
I met a 182 driver a few days ago that had the little box installed in the baggage area with a flat strip ant velcroed in the right side window, wirelessly connected to his ipad. He said he pd around $1000 for it. Better than $2600. He said he is still working the bugs out. I will hold off until through test flying then look into getting one. -------- Wayne Gillispie, A&P 5/93, PPC 10/08 Bldr# 40983SB Final assembly, aw cert, transition training with David Maib. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=354979#354979 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "DLM" <dlm34077(at)q.com>
Subject: Re: Radenna SkyRadar
Date: Oct 14, 2011
You might look at the Freeflight systems RANGR-E; a copy of their TSOed RANGR. -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of rv10flyer Sent: Friday, October 14, 2011 4:37 AM Subject: RV10-List: Re: Radenna SkyRadar I met a 182 driver a few days ago that had the little box installed in the baggage area with a flat strip ant velcroed in the right side window, wirelessly connected to his ipad. He said he pd around $1000 for it. Better than $2600. He said he is still working the bugs out. I will hold off until through test flying then look into getting one. -------- Wayne Gillispie, A&P 5/93, PPC 10/08 Bldr# 40983SB Final assembly, aw cert, transition training with David Maib. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=354979#354979 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 14, 2011
Subject: Fwd: Bose X headset on sale
From: Kelly McMullen <apilot2(at)gmail.com>
$475. http://www.aircraftspruce.com/dealoftheday.html ________________________________________________________________________________
From: <lewgall(at)charter.net>
Subject: Re: Fwd: Bose X headset on sale
Date: Oct 14, 2011
http://www.aircraftspruce.com/catalog/stpages/usedbosex2.php .... ? Later, - Lew -----Original Message----- From: Kelly McMullen Sent: Friday, October 14, 2011 5:41 PM Subject: RV10-List: Fwd: Bose X headset on sale $475. http://www.aircraftspruce.com/dealoftheday.html ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Radenna SkyRadar
From: "nukeflyboy" <flymoore(at)charter.net>
Date: Oct 14, 2011
No experience with that unit but FWIW, the guys at the Garmin booth at OSH said they will be releasing theirs soon at a competitive cost. -------- Dave Moore RV-6 flying RV-10 QB - Need to start panel Rest almost done Breathing too much fiberglass dust Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=355076#355076 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 15, 2011
From: Bill Watson <Mauledriver(at)nc.rr.com>
Subject: Re: What kind of max RPMs are you getting from your IO540
Coda; I pulled out the governor manual and a procedure for both static testing and in-flight testing were spelled out. I decided to leave the static alone and just do the inflight test. Made the adjustment required and overshot by 30 rpms or so. Readjusted and ready to go. Very simple and straight forward. I tried a much slower application of power during takeoff and no longer have the "overspeed" situation. Thanks all. On 10/7/2011 4:43 PM, Rob Kochman wrote: > If you use the MT governor from Vans and the standard engine > IO-540-D4A5 you will have the low RPM problem. See the governor > manual, but I believe a complete turn of the high RPM stop screw > yields a RPM increase of 50. Quick, simple adjustment. > With that set properly, you may see RPM above 2700 if you advance the > throttle quickly for takeoff. That requires a propeller adjustment > (see your prop manual). > -Rob > > > --> RV10-List message posted by: "John > Cumins"> > > Bill > > Sounds like the governor max stop is a bit off. You should be > able to get > 2700 in flight at full power. > > > -----Original Message----- > > > --> RV10-List message posted by: Bill > Watson> > > I'm still under 40 hours on my IO540-D4A5. On takeoff (from > 350' MSL) I'm > getting a momentary max RPM of 2690 at that point in the > ground run when the > engine speed up to it's max. Then it settles down to 2540 > for lift-off and > initial climb. (figures from GRT logs) > > I understand the max rated power is achieved at 2700 rpms. > I'm thinking > that's consistent with what I'm seeing. Is it? Are seeing > similar numbers? > > Thanks. > > Bill "flying a little and tinkering a lot" Watson > * > * > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Service report
From: "AirMike" <Mikeabel(at)Pacbell.net>
Date: Oct 16, 2011
Please describe in detail the location that you are describing. Is this behind the prop, outside the case of the engine? -------- See you OSH '12 Q/B - flying 2 yrs. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=355203#355203 ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Service report
From: Tim Olson <Tim(at)MyRV10.com>
Date: Oct 16, 2011
Inside the crankshaft bore and prop hub that mates to that area. Tim On Oct 16, 2011, at 11:16 AM, "AirMike" wrote: > > Please describe in detail the location that you are describing. > Is this behind the prop, outside the case of the engine? > > -------- > See you OSH '12 > Q/B - flying 2 yrs. > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=355203#355203 > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Dave Saylor <dave.saylor.aircrafters(at)gmail.com>
Date: Oct 16, 2011
Subject: Re: Service report
I think if you send in a small sample to an oil analysis lab they could tell you exactly what it is. Dave Saylor AirCrafters 140 Aviation Way Watsonville, CA 95076 831-722-9141 Shop 831-750-0284 Cell On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 9:40 AM, Tim Olson wrote: > > Inside the crankshaft bore and prop hub that mates to that area. > Tim > > > On Oct 16, 2011, at 11:16 AM, "AirMike" wrote: > > > > > Please describe in detail the location that you are describing. > > Is this behind the prop, outside the case of the engine? > > > > -------- > > See you OSH '12 > > Q/B - flying 2 yrs. > > > > > > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=355203#355203 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Service report
From: Rob Kermanj <flysrv10(at)gmail.com>
Date: Oct 16, 2011
Did not think about that. It was bad stuff! Sent from my iPhone On Oct 16, 2011, at 12:57 PM, Dave Saylor wrote: > I think if you send in a small sample to an oil analysis lab they could te ll you exactly what it is. > > Dave Saylor > AirCrafters > 140 Aviation Way > Watsonville, CA 95076 > 831-722-9141 Shop > 831-750-0284 Cell > > > On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 9:40 AM, Tim Olson wrote: > > Inside the crankshaft bore and prop hub that mates to that area. > Tim > > > > On Oct 16, 2011, at 11:16 AM, "AirMike" wrote: > > > > > Please describe in detail the location that you are describing. > > Is this behind the prop, outside the case of the engine? > > > > -------- > > See you OSH '12 > > Q/B - flying 2 yrs. > > > > > > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=355203#355203 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ========== > " target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List > ========== > MS - > k">http://forums.matronics.com > ==========


September 14, 2011 - October 17, 2011

RV10-Archive.digest.vol-ik