Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 03:11 AM - Re: Painted Prop Tips vrs Prop Balance (Lynn Matteson)
     2. 03:16 AM - Re: Much foward stick on climbout (dave)
     3. 03:29 AM - Re: aerocet 1100 amphib rigging (dave)
     4. 03:48 AM - Re: Much foward stick on climbout (Catz631@aol.com)
     5. 03:58 AM - Re: Re: Much foward stick on climbout (Catz631@aol.com)
     6. 05:44 AM - Re: aerocet 1100 amphib rigging (vetdrem)
     7. 06:12 AM - Re: Re: Much foward stick on climbout (steve shinabery)
     8. 07:41 AM - structeral epoxy questions (Jim_and_Lucy Chuk)
     9. 08:41 AM - Re: structural epoxy questions (Ted Palamarek)
    10. 08:47 AM - Re: aerocet 1100 amphib rigging (dave)
    11. 10:42 AM - Re: structeral epoxy questions (Lynn Matteson)
    12. 11:24 AM - BRS and 2 strokes - Was Much foward stick on climbout (Marco Menezes)
    13. 11:54 AM - Connecticut Post Online: student-made plane soars (msm_9949@yahoo.com)
    14. 04:04 PM - Re: New Kitfox fourm available OT (Noel Loveys)
    15. 04:06 PM - Re: New Kitfox fourm available (Noel Loveys)
    16. 04:50 PM - Re: Re: Painted Prop Tips vrs Prop Balance (Noel Loveys)
    17. 04:55 PM - Re: Re: Much foward stick on climbout (Noel Loveys)
    18. 06:57 PM - Re: BRS and 2 strokes - Was Much foward stick on climbout (Michael Gibbs)
    19. 07:03 PM - Re: structeral epoxy questions (Tom Jones)
 
 
 
Message 1
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Painted Prop Tips vrs Prop Balance | 
      
      
      I've got a clear-coated wood prop and when I land with the sun low  
      and behind me, it's a bitch to see through that reflective prop  
      circle. I've thought about painting the backside black, but have  
      hesitated because of the necessity of balance afterward....it's one  
      thing to touch up the tips as I just did, but painting the whole  
      prop, even just the backside would almost certainly call for a  
      balance job. I've done model airplane props, and if you paint one  
      tip, it will swing radically to one side (of the balance jig) until  
      dry, then it will swing less actively. This is to say the dried paint  
      weighs less, but you all knew that. I've done balancing on several  
      large fan blades, but haven't tried a prop like mine yet. I guess  
      I'll have to rig up a larger jig and check my prop now that it looks  
      like the "chunk" is liable to stay on. Besides, I need to earn my  
      Airplane Propellor-Balancing Merit Badge.
      
      Lynn Matteson
      Kitfox IV Speedster
      Jabiru 2200
      Status: flying w/528 hrs
      
      
      On Jun 14, 2008, at 1:05 AM, Guy Buchanan wrote:
      
      >
      > At 03:48 PM 6/13/2008, you wrote:
      >> I am considering painting the outside 2 to 3 inches of my prop to  
      >> make it more visible while running.  I have a Warp Drive prop and  
      >> would probably paint white tips on it with just a can of regular  
      >> white spray paint.  Any chance of changing the balance of the  
      >> prop?  Good idea or bad?
      >
      >         I painted the forward faces of my prop white, with red tips  
      > with black pin striping. I was careful to paint the same, but  
      > dynamically balanced after anyway. The balance turned out to be  
      > very close so I don't think you'll have a problem. It's a good idea  
      > for safety, but as was mentioned elsewhere, don't paint the back of  
      > the blades, it makes them visible from the cockpit.
      >
      >
      > Guy Buchanan
      > San Diego, CA
      > K-IV 1200 / 582-C / Warp / 100% done, thanks mostly to Bob Ducar.
      >
      >
      
      
Message 2
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Much foward stick on climbout | 
      
      
      Mike ,
      
      That I meant in above message -- do W & B first ......... 
      Then if too far aft remove the BRS and try it .......... if the Cof G become in
      range again then remove it and test fly it.
      
      As far as the 2 stroke comment -----what ever ..........  99% of all engine failures
      stem from the operator .. 912s die too as do any engine.......... most issues
      are fuel related.  My Kitfox has 470 hours on the last engine i put in June
      2006 and that is my 3rd engine in this plane.
      
      And furthermore I would certainly rather land engine out in control that with a
      BRS taking you were it wants to . Kitfoxes make good gliders.  
      
      Dave
      
      --------
      Rotax Dealer, Ontario Canada
      Flying Videos and Kitfox Info
      http://www.cfisher.com/
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=187851#187851
      
      
Message 3
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: aerocet 1100 amphib rigging | 
      
      
      Louis , I was not aware that Aerocets went over centre to lock up when gear is
      retracted ? Mine are held up by the control cables and the Johnson bar detent
      that locks them up.  When locked down the Johnson bar once again has a detent
      that holds the gear over centre and locked down.  You have to make sure that mains
      especially are over centre when the handle is locked in the detant. If not
      you will twist one of the parts inside and/or bend or shear off the bolts that
      go through it.
      
      --------
      Rotax Dealer, Ontario Canada
      Flying Videos and Kitfox Info
      http://www.cfisher.com/
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=187853#187853
      
      
Message 4
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Much foward stick on climbout | 
      
      Chris,
        What you could do,as I did,is to install an elevator trim tab. I too  have 
      the classic 4 with the BRS behind the seat. I am much heavier than you and  
      have the stab adjusted to the bottom hole vs the top. I was getting an arm like
      
      "Popeye" holding back pressure on landing. I also had to hold a little 
      forward  pressure on take off and in cruise which I solved by installing a little
      
      bungee  device on the stick (as I once had in a Tailwind)
        Finally I said enough of this mickey mouse stuff and I ordered an  elevator 
      trim system from Highwing LLc .I installed the "hat" switch  on the stick and 
      I can now take off , cruise and land almost hands off. No more  elevator 
      pressure. It is the best improvement I have done on the aircraft. I  feel your
      
      pain !
                                                                 
                                                                  Dick Maddux
                                                                  Fox 4-1200
                                                                  Pensacola,Fl
      
      
      **************Vote for your city's best dining and nightlife. City's Best 
      2008.      (http://citysbest.aol.com?ncid=aolacg00050000000102)
      
Message 5
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Much foward stick on climbout | 
      
      My Fox 4 has the BRS behind the co pilot also and my battery is on the  
      inside of the firewall (pilot compartment side). I weigh 230 lbs (I know lard 
      ass) 
      I am  running the 912 which is somewhat heavier than the 2 stroke I  believe.
       I just did a weight and balance a month ago and I am comfortably  within the 
      cg limits and no way to get out of limits without exceeding gross  (which I 
      won,t do)
      
                                                                   Dick Maddux
                                                                    Pensacola,Fl
      
      
      **************Vote for your city's best dining and nightlife. City's Best 
      2008.      (http://citysbest.aol.com?ncid=aolacg00050000000102)
      
Message 6
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: aerocet 1100 amphib rigging | 
      
      
      Dave,
      
      There is an up lock also, at least for the mains.  The General description mentions
      it, and Step 30 of the installation instructions talks about it also.  I
      can get the mains to lock in the up position, but not the nose wheels.  That is
      why I asked.  I think that I am going to ASSume there is not an uplock for the
      nose wheels.
      
      Louie
      191GW
      model 3 912ul
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=187857#187857
      
      
Message 7
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Much foward stick on climbout | 
      
      
      kitfoxmike wrote:
      >
      > No way, leave the BRS on when doing the weight and balance, it is part of the
      aircraft.  Chances are you have too much tail weight.  Besides you need to know
      what your current problem is.  Sorry to say this, but the BRS is a must if
      you have a 2 stroke.  I'm going to catch heck now.
      >
      >
      > Read this topic online here:
      >
      > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=187836#187836
      >
      >
      >   
      > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
      >
      >
      > Checked by AVG. 
      >   
      WOW,Mike that Hurts,,Steve Shinabery N554KF  KF2  with the mighty 582
      
      
Message 8
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | structeral epoxy questions | 
      
      
      Hi all,  I'm about to start working on my Kitfox 4 project wings and have s
      ome questions about the epoxy.  I got 2 cans of each of the Scotch weld 221
      6 B/A adhesive, but they are as old as the kit (1994).  I mixed some up and
       left it on a piece of plywood and stuck a 16 penny nail in it.  When it ha
      rded, I tried to bend the nail out of it sideways, and all that happened wa
      s the nail bent.  Even though it seems good, I suppose I should get new adh
      esive.  Any thoughts on a good adhesive besides Scotch weld and any ideas o
      n getting accurate mix ratios of the two parts of the glue would help me.  
      I see some of these glues can be pumped through a small double caulk gun an
      d it comes out mixed, anybody use that stuff?    Thanks,  Jim Chuk  Avids, 
       Kitfox 4
      
      
      _________________________________________________________________
      It=92s easy to add contacts from Facebook and other social sites through Wi
      ndows Live=99 Messenger. Learn how.
      https://www.invite2messenger.net/im/?source=TXT_EML_WLH_LearnHow
      
Message 9
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | structural epoxy questions | 
      
      Jim
      
      
      The glue that is supplied now is "Hysol 9460" and it comes in tubes that you
      can attach the missing nozzles to. John McBean at Kitfox has the glue and
      mixing nozzles. Give him a call and I'm sure he will get what ever you need
      off to you quickly. 
      
      
      Ted Palamarek
      
      Edmonton Alberta
      
      KF IV-912
      
        _____  
      
      From: owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Jim_and_Lucy
      Chuk
      Sent: June 14, 2008 8:39 AM
      Subject: Kitfox-List: structeral epoxy questions
      
      
      Hi all,  I'm about to start working on my Kitfox 4 project wings and have
      some questions about the epoxy.  I got 2 cans of each of the Scotch weld
      2216 B/A adhesive, but they are as old as the kit (1994).  I mixed some up
      and left it on a piece of plywood and stuck a 16 penny nail in it.  When it
      harded, I tried to bend the nail out of it sideways, and all that happened
      was the nail bent.  Even though it seems good, I suppose I should get new
      adhesive.  Any thoughts on a good adhesive besides Scotch weld and any ideas
      on getting accurate mix ratios of the two parts of the glue would help me.
      I see some of these glues can be pumped through a small double caulk gun and
      it comes out mixed, anybody use that stuff?    Thanks,  Jim Chuk  Avids,
      Kitfox 4
      
      
Message 10
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: aerocet 1100 amphib rigging | 
      
      
      vet,  read again and study your gear. 
      
      The Johnson bar holds your gear in the "locked  up" position .  There is NO over
      centre on the retract mode. So if your Johnson bar comes out of the detent when
      retracted then your gear will fall and /or sag. 
      
      I got mine in shop today.  Have to repair the Left main gear. Fiberglass is cracked
      at link tube.  I too abusive   hundreds of landings on grass runways  beats
      em up annually.
      
      Dave
      
      --------
      Rotax Dealer, Ontario Canada
      Flying Videos and Kitfox Info
      http://www.cfisher.com/
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=187873#187873
      
      
Message 11
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: structeral epoxy questions | 
      
      
      Hi Jim-
      When I got my 3-previous-owners kit, I smelled the structural  
      adhesive, and it smelled strong of ammonia, which I heard/read was  
      the death knell of this product. This product was 10 years old at the  
      time, so I "chuked" it....bad pun intended. I ordered Hysol 9460  
      locally in...as I recall...1pound cans...one each of hardener and  
      epoxy. They got to me in less than 24 hours.
      I mix mine using the gram scales that were formerly used in my other  
      life....NO, NO, NO...not seriously. What I do is set the scales up  
      with a clear plastic yogurt lid on the side where the adhesive is to  
      be placed, then set the scales to zero. Then using the desired amount  
      of each, measure the exact amount of each by weight. Measuring each  
      by volume doesn't work for me...too imprecise. But whatever method  
      you chose to weigh or eyeball, the beauty of mixing on the  
      CLEAR...not translucent...plastic or glass is that you can see when  
      the mix is absolutely all mixed by looking at the underside of the  
      glass or plastic...it'll be all grey with no white or black streaks  
      showing.
      One guy told  me he mixed the stuff by putting one part of the black  
      on the "mixing board" and then adding the white until the mix was  
      grey. I can't imagine he ever got two batches mixed the same but he  
      says he did. I'm too anal to do it this way. And I'm too damned cheap  
      to buy the double tube stuff...what happens when you get to the end,  
      toss the stuff left in the tube when the plunger is all the way in?
      
      Lynn Matteson
      Kitfox IV Speedster
      Jabiru 2200
      Status: flying w/530 hrs
      
      
      On Jun 14, 2008, at 10:38 AM, Jim_and_Lucy Chuk wrote:
      
      > Hi all,  I'm about to start working on my Kitfox 4 project wings  
      > and have some questions about the epoxy.  I got 2 cans of each of  
      > the Scotch weld 2216 B/A adhesive, but they are as old as the kit  
      > (1994).  I mixed some up and left it on a piece of plywood and  
      > stuck a 16 penny nail in it.  When it harded, I tried to bend the  
      > nail out of it sideways, and all that happened was the nail bent.   
      > Even though it seems good, I suppose I should get new adhesive.   
      > Any thoughts on a good adhesive besides Scotch weld and any ideas  
      > on getting accurate mix ratios of the two parts of the glue would  
      > help me.  I see some of these glues can be pumped through a small  
      > double caulk gun and it comes out mixed, anybody use that stuff?     
      > Thanks,  Jim Chuk  Avids,  Kitfox 4
      >
      > arget=_blank>http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-Listp:// 
      > forums.matronics.comblank>http://www.matronics.com/contribution
      > Its easy to add contacts from Facebook and other social sites  
      > through Windows Live Messenger. Learn How._- 
      > ============================================================ _- 
      > http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List_- 
      > ============================================================ _- 
      > forums.matronics.com_- 
      > ============================================================ _- 
      > contribution_- 
      > ===========================================================
      
      
Message 12
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | BRS and 2 strokes - Was Much foward stick on climbout | 
      
      Heck Mike, let me be among the first. There's no point in my trying to
      convince those suffering from 2-stroke phobia of their reliability and safety
      when properly maintained and operated.  But, even if they were all
      you mistakenly believe they are, BRS is not the answer.  
       
      BRS is for saving your bacon when structural failures occur in flight. In an engine-out
      situation, you generally fly the airplane down and make the best landing
      you can. That's true whether your flying behind a P&W or a Stihl (though
      I suspect mountain flying and epilepsy might be exceptions to this general
      rule).
       
      Kitfoxes are structurally sound and my Mod II needs every spare ounce for fuel
      and passenger. SO, at least in my case, BRS is like the proverbial "back
      pockets on a hog." Sure, I'd be "safer" with BRS. Microsoft Flight Simunator
      is safer too. :-)
       
      Marco Menezes
      M2, 589-90 , "C" box
       
      
      xmike <customtrans@qwest.net> wrote:
      
      From: kitfoxmike <customtrans@qwest.net>
      Subject: Kitfox-List: Re: Much foward stick on climbout
      
      --> Kitfox-List message posted by: "kitfoxmike"
      <customtrans@qwest.net>
      
      No way, leave the BRS on when doing the weight and balance, it is part of the
      aircraft.  Chances are you have too much tail weight.  Besides you need to know
      what your current problem is.  Sorry to say this, but the BRS is a must if you
      have a 2 stroke.  I'm going to catch heck now.
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=187836#187836
      
      
            
      
Message 13
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Connecticut Post Online: student-made plane soars | 
      
      --- MIME Errors - No Plain-Text Section Found ---
      
        A message with no text/plain MIME section was received.
        The entire body of the message was removed.  Please
        resend the email using Plain Text formatting.
      
        HOTMAIL is notorious for only including an HTML section
        in their client's default configuration.  If you're using
        HOTMAIL, please see your email application's settings
        and switch to a default mail option that uses "Plain Text".
      
      --- MIME Errors No Plain-Text Section Found ---
      
      
Message 14
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | New Kitfox fourm available OT | 
      
      I don't know about wood fired but occasionally the rubber bands do get a bit
      stretched. J!
      
      
      To address the whole idea of a new Kitfox list: Why fix something that isn't
      broke?   I agree wholeheartedly with the idea it's not the hardware of the
      list but the members who make things interesting.  I do a lot more reading
      here than I do writing.  As I'm in the throes of installing a  912 into my
      plane, and I know so little about this engine, I've been doing a lot of mail
      reading.  Often I come across items, like this one, that I feel deserve a
      comment.  I would miss a lot of that on a more structured list.
      
      
      Noel
      
      
      From: owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of patrick reilly
      Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 6:00 PM
      Subject: RE: Kitfox-List: New Kitfox fourm available
      
      
      Rick, Good Luck with the web page. This one works pretty well. I am also
      interested in RV's but to me Van's Airforce web is too complex. Us Kitfoxers
      are simple folk. Hell, Lynn and Deke up in MI still use Kerosene powered
      computers and I think Noel and Dave in Canada are running wood fired MACs.
      We don't mind hitting the keyboard 2 or 3 times to get info, but, Damn it,
      that's it!
      Do Not Archive
      
      Pat Reilly
      Mod 3 582 Rebuild
      Rockford, IL
      
      
        _____  
      
      From: randy@romeolima.com
      Subject: Re: Kitfox-List: New Kitfox fourm available
      
      Hi Rick,
      
      
      Thanks for your comments. Having been a long time RV builder and user of the
      www.vansairforce.net <http://www.vansairforce.net/>  forums I know that the
      vBulletin forum platform has some significant features that enhance the user
      experience. Yes, it is different, but once you get your routine down with
      forum and thread subscriptions I think you'll find it to be a better tool.
      Also, and this is a biggie, I have it set up to allow pictures to be
      embedded right in the messages (although limited in size to 640 x 640
      pixels). Most folks have digital cameras these days, and we all know that
      one picture is worth a thousand words, yet most folks also don't have their
      own web sites for posting pics. Therefore simply putting a copy in your
      message is powerful indeed. If you check around the web you'll see that all
      the truly state-of-the art communities use vbulletin or something
      equivalent. 
      
      
      Several years ago the RV community went through this exact transition and
      there were a few who didn't understand or support the idea, but over time
      the bulk of the community did and never looked back. 
      
      
      Of course I am just providing an alternative, users are free to go where
      they like, but you have my commitment to develop TeamKitfox.com into a truly
      valuable tool for the community. As an EAA Chapter president, Technical
      Counselor, Flight Advisor, and two time RV builder I am in it for the long
      run.
      
      
      Cheers,
      
      Randy
      
      
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      
      From: Rick <mailto:wingsdown@verizon.net>  
      
      
      Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 9:14 AM
      
      Subject: RE: Kitfox-List: New Kitfox fourm available
      
      
      I like the web page look, but I really think this could be incorporated into
      the existing forum. It is the knowledge and experiences of builders and
      flyers that make this forum so powerful. Besides it takes money and personal
      time to run a forum so why duplicate efforts.  I am not building at present
      but I really want to know our list be around in 5 years. Maybe you should
      talk with Matt Dralle off line.
      
      
      Rick
      
      -----Original Message-----
      From: owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Randy Lervold
      Sent: 2008-06-13 08:42
      Subject: Kitfox-List: New Kitfox fourm available
      
      Kitfoxers,
      
      
      Just a quick note to let you all know about a new Kitfox forum I've started
      with some different features than are offered here on this list. Please
      consider taking a minute to check it out... www.teamkitfox.com
      <http://www.teamkitfox.com/>   
      
      In the interest of building an enhanced online community I'd appreciate your
      feedback on features you'd like to see.
      
      
      Randy Lervold
      
      Kitfox Super Sport, just starting
      
      www.mykitfox.com <http://www.mykitfox.com/> 
      
      www.teamkitfox.com <http://www.teamkitfox.com/> 
      
      
      href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List">http://www.matronhref
      "http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com
      href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/c
      
      
      href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List">http://www.matronhref
      "http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com
      href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/c
      
      
      arget=_blank>http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List
      p://forums.matronics.com
      blank>http://www.matronics.com/contribution
      
      
Message 15
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | New Kitfox fourm available | 
      
      
      Lynn:
      
      There are days I think your Mac has enough corn :-)  And my PC is catching
      it!
      
      Noel 
      
      
      -----Original Message-----
      From: owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Lynn Matteson
      Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 6:43 PM
      Subject: Re: Kitfox-List: New Kitfox fourm available
      
      
      I'm gonna trade my kerosene Mac in on a corn-powered Mac as soon as  
      they can down-grade to that technology.
      
      Lynn Matteson
      Kitfox IV Speedster
      Jabiru 2200
      Status: flying w/528 hrs
      do not archive
      
      
      On Jun 13, 2008, at 4:29 PM, patrick reilly wrote:
      
      > Rick, Good Luck with the web page. This one works pretty well. I am  
      > also interested in RV's but to me Van's Airforce web is too  
      > complex. Us Kitfoxers are simple folk. Hell, Lynn and Deke up in MI  
      > still use Kerosene powered computers and I think Noel and Dave in  
      > Canada are running wood fired MACs. We don't mind hitting the  
      > keyboard 2 or 3 times to get info, but, Damn it, that's it!
      > Do Not Archive
      >
      > Pat Reilly
      > Mod 3 582 Rebuild
      > Rockford, IL
      >
      >
      > From: randy@romeolima.com
      > To: kitfox-list@matronics.com
      > Subject: Re: Kitfox-List: New Kitfox fourm available
      > Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 09:49:31 -0700
      >
      > Hi Rick,
      >
      > Thanks for your comments. Having been a long time RV builder and  
      > user of the www.vansairforce.net forums I know that the vBulletin  
      > forum platform has some significant features that enhance the user  
      > experience. Yes, it is different, but once you get your routine  
      > down with forum and thread subscriptions I think you'll find it to  
      > be a better tool. Also, and this is a biggie, I have it set up to  
      > allow pictures to be embedded right in the messages (although  
      > limited in size to 640 x 640 pixels). Most folks have digital  
      > cameras these days, and we all know that one picture is worth a  
      > thousand words, yet most folks also don't have their own web sites  
      > for posting pics. Therefore simply putting a copy in your message  
      > is powerful indeed. If you check around the web you'll see that all  
      > the truly state-of-the art communities use vbulletin or something  
      > equivalent.
      >
      > Several years ago the RV community went through this exact  
      > transition and there were a few who didn't understand or support  
      > the idea, but over time the bulk of the community did and never  
      > looked back.
      >
      > Of course I am just providing an alternative, users are free to go  
      > where they like, but you have my commitment to develop  
      > TeamKitfox.com into a truly valuable tool for the community. As an  
      > EAA Chapter president, Technical Counselor, Flight Advisor, and two  
      > time RV builder I am in it for the long run.
      >
      > Cheers,
      > Randy
      >
      > ----- Original Message -----
      > From: Rick
      > To: kitfox-list@matronics.com
      > Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 9:14 AM
      > Subject: RE: Kitfox-List: New Kitfox fourm available
      >
      > I like the web page look, but I really think this could be  
      > incorporated into the existing forum. It is the knowledge and  
      > experiences of builders and flyers that make this forum so  
      > powerful. Besides it takes money and personal time to run a forum  
      > so why duplicate efforts.  I am not building at present but I  
      > really want to know our list be around in 5 years. Maybe you should  
      > talk with Matt Dralle off line.
      >
      >
      > Rick
      > -----Original Message-----
      > From: owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-kitfox- 
      > list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Randy Lervold
      > Sent: 2008-06-13 08:42
      > To: kitfox-list@matronics.com
      > Subject: Kitfox-List: New Kitfox fourm available
      >
      > Kitfoxers,
      >
      > Just a quick note to let you all know about a new Kitfox forum I've  
      > started with some different features than are offered here on this  
      > list. Please consider taking a minute to check it  
      > out...www.teamkitfox.com
      > In the interest of building an enhanced online community I'd  
      > appreciate your feedback on features you'd like to see.
      >
      > Randy Lervold
      > Kitfox Super Sport, just starting
      > www.mykitfox.com
      > www.teamkitfox.com
      >
      >
      > href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List">http:// 
      > www.matronhref="http://forums.matronics.com">http:// 
      > forums.matronics.comhref="http://www.matronics.com/ 
      > contribution">http://www.matronics.com/chref="http:// 
      > www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List">http:// 
      > www.matronhref="http://forums.matronics.com">http:// 
      > forums.matronics.comhref="http://www.matronics.com/ 
      > contribution">http://www.matronics.com/carget=_blank>http:// 
      > www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-Listp:// 
      > forums.matronics.comblank>http://www.matronics.com/contribution_- 
      > ============================================================ _- 
      > http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List_- 
      > ============================================================ _- 
      > forums.matronics.com_- 
      > ============================================================ _- 
      > contribution_- 
      > ===========================================================
      
      
Message 16
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Painted Prop Tips vrs Prop Balance | 
      
      
      I had a three blade Ivo IFA on my 582.  It had the stainless steel tapes to
      protect the leading edge.  I did find it would glint in the sun when I was
      flying with the sun behind me.  Rather than have a prop all white I think
      the two white stripes near the tips of the props 
      
      Noel Loveys
      AME Intern, RPP
      Kitfox III-A, 582,B box
      Ivo IFA, Aerocet 1100 floats
      
      
      -----Original Message-----
      From: owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of FlyboyTR
      Sent: Saturday, June 14, 2008 12:36 AM
      Subject: Kitfox-List: Re: Painted Prop Tips vrs Prop Balance
      
      
      Jim,
      I personally do not recommend painting the back of the prop.  In doing so,
      the prop now becomes visible to the pilot and creates a white or yellow ring
      in the visual field.  In general terms, the back of the prop should be
      black.  The color needs to be on the front.  I had the opportunity to fly
      behind a new composite prop that was all white.  After about 2 hours of
      looking through this white ring I suggested to the new owner that he paint
      the back of the prop black.  Now the prop is virtually invisible to the
      pilot...and no more headaches and tired eyes.
      
      When you paint your three blade Warp, just try to apply the same amount of
      paint to each tip.  Don't forget to remove your tape before the paint dries!
      Let us know how it turns out!
      
      Travis  
      
      
      Jim Shumaker wrote:
      > I paint the outer tip of the prop on the back for visibility.  The front I
      paint as needed for repairs.  I use yellow because it is visible and matches
      my plane.  Balance with a lawnmower blade balancer, available at Sears.
      >   
      >  Jim Shumaker
      > 
      > 
      >  ---
       :D
      
      --------
      Travis Rayner
      Mobile, AL
      Skystar Vixen, N-789DF
      Continental IO-240,  Prince P-Tip Prop
      ADI-II Autopilot
      AnyWhereMap Navigation with weather
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=187835#187835
      
      
Message 17
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Much foward stick on climbout | 
      
      I wouldn't say you'll catch heck...  But if your plane needs to have a BRS
      to be safe then you have the wrong plane.  One of the nice things about the
      'Fox is it lands pretty nice deadstick.   It may be of some use in the case
      of a mid air incursion. In such a case the BRS itself may be damaged.  If
      you have felt safe flying without the BRS then pull it and gain the weight
      advantage and help your balance situation which sounds to be seriously aft.
      
      
      Sigtaturea
      
      
      Noel Loveys
      
      Campbellton, NL, Canada
      
      CDN AME intern, PP-Rec
      
      C-FINB, Kitfox III-A
      
      Going 912, Aerocet 1100 floats
      
      noelloveys@yahoo.ca
      
      
      -----Original Message-----
      From: owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of kitfoxmike
      Sent: Saturday, June 14, 2008 12:43 AM
      Subject: Kitfox-List: Re: Much foward stick on climbout
      
      
      
      
      No way, leave the BRS on when doing the weight and balance, it is part of
      the aircraft.  Chances are you have too much tail weight.  Besides you need
      to know what your current problem is.  Sorry to say this, but the BRS is a
      must if you have a 2 stroke.  I'm going to catch heck now.
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=187836#187836
      
      
Message 18
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: BRS and 2 strokes - Was Much foward stick on  climbout | 
      
      
      Marco sez:
      
      >Sure, I'd be "safer" with BRS. Microsoft Flight Simunator is safer too. :-)
      
      Reminds me of the old saw, "A ship in a harbor is safe, but that's 
      not what ships are for."
      
      Mike G.
      N728KF, Model IV-1200 Speedster
      Phoenix, AZ
      
      
Message 19
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: structeral epoxy questions | 
      
      
      Jim Chuck
      Having used both the 3M and Hysol, I highly recommend the Hysol.  It is much easier
      to work with. It doesn't sag like the 3m.
      
      To make factory like fillets put the mixed hysol in a sturdy ziplock bag and cut
      a small piece of a corner so you can use it like a cake decorator to apply.
      
      Hysol is mixed 50/50 by volume so real easy to portion out too.
      
      --------
      Tom Jones
      Classic IV
      503 Rotax, 72 inch Two blade Warp
      Ellensburg, WA
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=187930#187930
      
      
 
Other Matronics Email List Services
 
 
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
 
 
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
  
 |