Kitfox-List Digest Archive

Mon 05/18/09


Total Messages Posted: 26



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 03:22 AM - Re: rudder trim tab (Lynn Matteson)
     2. 03:41 AM - Re: Re: Cutting 2/12in. hole in Plexiglass doors (Larry Huntley)
     3. 03:42 AM - Re: Installing Fuel Primer (Lynn Matteson)
     4. 05:19 AM - Re: Installing Fuel Primer (Don & Betty Stevenson)
     5. 05:40 AM - Re: Re: Charging System Theory - A few Questions (Catz631@aol.com)
     6. 06:11 AM - Re: Cutting 2/12in. hole in Plexiglass doors (Catz631@aol.com)
     7. 06:19 AM - Re: Cutting 2/12in. hole in Plexiglass doors (Tom Jones)
     8. 06:42 AM - Re: Stuck Oil Filter (Catz631@aol.com)
     9. 08:14 AM - Re: Re: Stuck Oil Filter (Lowell Fitt)
    10. 10:00 AM - Re: rudder trim tab (kerrjohna@comcast.net)
    11. 10:20 AM - Video test (Tom Jones)
    12. 10:21 AM - Re: Stuck Oil Filter (Lynn Matteson)
    13. 12:31 PM - Re: Video test (Ted Palamarek)
    14. 12:40 PM - Re: Video test (Tom Jones)
    15. 03:53 PM - Re: rudder trim tab (KITFOXZ@aol.com)
    16. 05:58 PM - Re: rudder trim tab (Lynn Matteson)
    17. 05:58 PM - Re: rudder trim tab (Lowell Fitt)
    18. 06:08 PM - Re: Re: Stuck Oil Filter (CDE2fly@aol.com)
    19. 06:43 PM - Re: rudder trim tab (JetPilot)
    20. 06:46 PM - Re: Cutting 2/12in. hole in Plexiglass doors (patrick reilly)
    21. 07:06 PM - 912S Choke Return Springs (CDE2fly@aol.com)
    22. 07:12 PM - Kitfox - how high have you gone ? (dave)
    23. 07:38 PM - Re: Re: rudder trim tab (KITFOXZ@aol.com)
    24. 09:52 PM - Re: Kitfox - how high have you gone ? (sourdostan@aol.com)
    25. 10:05 PM - Runaway plane - serious mishap - throttle cable (rcsfca)
    26. 11:29 PM - Re: rudder trim tab (JC Propeller Design)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:22:55 AM PST US
    From: Lynn Matteson <lynnmatt@jps.net>
    Subject: Re: rudder trim tab
    Here is a shot of my present trim tab, soon to be modified with a servo from the model airplane world, and a controller. The tab looks larger than it actually is, and I may be shrinking it further. I staggered the rivets so that it would be more stable, and I attached it with aluminum rivets so I could "drill it off" when the time came to hinge it for the servo application. Also, I have since painted it, so it is a little less obtrusive than it appears. Lynn Matteson Kitfox IV Speedster, taildragger Jabiru 2200, #2062, 654 hrs Sensenich 62x46 Wood prop Electroair direct-fire ignition system Status: flying On May 17, 2009, at 2:56 PM, william lurcott wrote: > Greetings, > I have been reading the list here for a while, and want to take the > opportunity to say thanks to all of you. I have a Series V with a > Lycoming O-235 which is a great source of fun and unending lessons > for me. There is one issue that I have, and that is that I must > always input right rudder. I expect that at higher power settings, > but at cruise? Anyway, I was wondering since the aircraft is > already covered and flying is there some add-on type tab that I > could affix to the rudder so that I don't have to constantly push > on that right side. Cruise requires about 3-4 pounds or so of > pressure. If someone has a photo or drawing, I would appreciate > that too, as I am very visual. Thanks for any input. > Will Lurcott > Series V > Lyc O-235 > Flagler Beach, FL > > www.matronics.com/contribution _- > ===========================================================


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:41:45 AM PST US
    From: "Larry Huntley" <asq@roadrunner.com>
    Subject: Re: Cutting 2/12in. hole in Plexiglass doors
    Lexan is a polycarbonate. You can just bore through it with a hole saw. Larry ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tom Jones" <nahsikhs@elltel.net> Sent: Sunday, May 17, 2009 10:20 PM Subject: Kitfox-List: Re: Cutting 2/12in. hole in Plexiglass doors > > I just ordered the 2" snap vents from aircraft spruce. I was planing to > use a hole saw to cut the hole. My doors are lexan though. I'll try it > on a scrap piece of lexan first. If that doesn't work I'll try the dremel > sanding drum. > > -------- > Tom Jones > Classic IV > 503 Rotax, 72 inch Two blade Warp > Ellensburg, WA > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=244454#244454 > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 17:05:00


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:42:00 AM PST US
    From: Lynn Matteson <lynnmatt@jps.net>
    Subject: Re: Installing Fuel Primer
    I'm not sure what the fitting is, but lately I've been making/ modifying primer lines on a 172 Cessna, and that engine uses a small fitting with a round nose, which is silver soldered to the 1/8 fuel lines. My flight instructor has been ordering all the parts from McFairlane (sp?) so I don't know exactly the part numbers are, but maybe a check at a local airport might turn up something. In the meantime, I'll look further into it. Lynn Matteson Kitfox IV Speedster, taildragger Jabiru 2200, #2062, 654 hrs Sensenich 62x46 Wood prop Electroair direct-fire ignition system Status: flying do not archive On May 17, 2009, at 9:10 PM, wingnut wrote: > > Trying to get back in the air after 4 months of down time. I'd like > to start by installing one of these: > > http://www.aircraftspruce.com/catalog/appages/acsprimer.php > > I can't find a fitting on the aircraft spruce web site that would > mate this thing to the 1/8 id fuel primer line they sell. Also, I > take it I'll need a 1/4 to 1/8 reducing Tee to tap into the feed > from the tank but I can't find that either. What am I missing? > > -------- > Luis Rodriguez > Model IV 1200 > Rotax 912UL > Flying Weekly > Laurens, SC (34A) > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=244441#244441 > >


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:19:05 AM PST US
    From: Don & Betty Stevenson <shericom@rogers.com>
    Subject: Re: Installing Fuel Primer
    I have the original primer kit and instructions as supplied from Kit Fox wi th the 1992 M4-1200 kit I was building, I decided not to install it at the time of the build. If anyone is interested it is available for a modest pri ce plus postage. Please contact me off list, Don Don Stevenson 905-838-5283--- email shericom@rogers.com --- On Mon, 5/18/09, wingnut <wingnut@spamarrest.com> wrote: From: wingnut <wingnut@spamarrest.com> Subject: Kitfox-List: Installing Fuel Primer Received: Monday, May 18, 2009, 1:10 AM Trying to get back in the air after 4 months of down time. I'd like to star t by installing one of these: http://www.aircraftspruce.com/catalog/appages/acsprimer.php I can't find a fitting on the aircraft spruce web site that would mate this thing to the 1/8 id fuel primer line they sell. Also, I take it I'll need a 1/4 to 1/8 reducing Tee to tap into the feed from the tank but I can't fi nd that either. What am I missing? -------- Luis Rodriguez Model IV 1200 Rotax 912UL Flying Weekly Laurens, SC (34A) Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=244441#244441 le, List Admin.


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:40:29 AM PST US
    From: Catz631@aol.com
    Subject: Re: Charging System Theory - A few Questions
    Dave, Thanks for the super explanation of the electrical system ! It was easy to understand and the electrical system is finally coming into focus !! This has always been a problem area for me . I really appreciate all of the replies from everyone ! It will help me analyze my own electrical problem when it happens (at least a little bit) Dick Maddux Fox 4-1200 Pensacola,Fl **************A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See Yours in Just 2 Easy Steps! =Mayfooter51809NO115)


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:11:47 AM PST US
    From: Catz631@aol.com
    Subject: Re: Cutting 2/12in. hole in Plexiglass doors
    I used a hole saw. I went very slow and carefully and it worked fine. I then finished the holes with about 4-600 grit paper. Both holes turned out very nice with no cracks. The ventilation increase is a must here in hot,steamy,muggy, Florida. I took a picture of the location of the vent on the factory Apollo Fox which is out of Tampa ,Fl. (at Sun and Fun) I figured they probably had the best location for the vent figured out. They did. Dick Maddux Fox 4-1200 Pensacola,Fl **************A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See Yours in Just 2 Easy Steps! =Mayfooter51809NO115)


    Message 7


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:19:27 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Cutting 2/12in. hole in Plexiglass doors
    From: "Tom Jones" <nahsikhs@elltel.net>
    > I took a picture of the location of the vent on the factory Apollo Fox which is out of Tampa ,Fl. (at Sun and Fun) I figured they probably had the best location for the vent figured out. They did. Dick, can you post the picture? -------- Tom Jones Classic IV 503 Rotax, 72 inch Two blade Warp Ellensburg, WA Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=244503#244503


    Message 8


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:42:41 AM PST US
    From: Catz631@aol.com
    Subject: Re: Stuck Oil Filter
    Speaking of a stuck oil filter,during my last oil change I had something quite different. I knew they could be a bugger to get off so I fitted my oil filter removal tool but noticed the filter moved before I even got the tool on ! The filter then spun off in my hand with no effort at all ! That would have been a mess in flight if it spun itself off ! Quite likely ,would have ruined my day! I tightened it down per the factory instructions when I did the prior oil change. I had the instructions right in front of me and followed it to the letter (including the engine run and filter tighten check) I told Dean at Lockwood about this and he said I was one of two people he had heard of this happening to. Well once is enough so I have installed a large hose clamp around the filter (lined with rubber-Adel clamp like) and have safety wired the clamp to the engine so the filter won't move (also torque marked it) Dick Maddux Fox 4-1200 912 UL Pensacola,Fl **************A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See Yours in Just 2 Easy Steps! =Mayfooter51809NO115)


    Message 9


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:14:23 AM PST US
    From: "Lowell Fitt" <lcfitt@sbcglobal.net>
    Subject: Re: Stuck Oil Filter
    Darin, I appreciate the heads-up on this. I have not been aware of the information you mention. My thinking is that when removing the oil filter and the magnetic plug, oil will drain and the oil draining out of the engine at those points will result in something replacing the volumn of oil lost. This - most likely air. I guess if you are really quick, the air introduced will not be problematic. Also, when I changed the oil, I would use a vacuum drain apparatus that would suck the tank dry, I would then open the tank and wipe it out - this would be on the suction side. There was always a lot of silvery sludge there after one of the AVGas use periods. If I were to make a guess here, it would be that Rotax found that with the engines that were merely drained and refilled, like everything else out there, the no purging idea might be good for business, i.e. less complexity. I suppose with the new build, I will purge just like the old days. What I was trying to suggest in my original post was essentially that removeing the oil filter is not part of the purging process. Lowell ----- Original Message ----- From: "darinh" <gerns25@netscape.net> Sent: Sunday, May 17, 2009 9:40 PM Subject: Kitfox-List: Re: Stuck Oil Filter > > > lcfitt(at)sbcglobal.net wrote: >> Chris, >> >> ...Regarding purging the oil system. This is usually done after an oil >> change >> to purge any air that might have been introduced into the system during >> the >> oil change especially if the filter is changed or the magnetic plug is >> removed for inspection... >> >> --- > > > Lowell, > > According to Rotax-Owner.com you do not need to purge the oil system after > you do a simple oil change. Basically if you work on the suction side of > the system, you will need to purge the system. Yes, the tank is on the > suction side but as long as you don't remove the tank and drain the > suction line, you don't need to purge it. I have attached a Technical > Article from the site for anyones information. It does a good job of > describing the oils system, the SI's that have been put out by Rotax and > examples of when oil purging is required. Take it for what it is worth > but this is what they have to say about purging and oil changes. I > personally have purged my system after each oil change but to be quite > honest, I have never had a situation where the lifters had air in the > either before or after the oil change. > > -------- > Darin Hawkes > Series 7 > 914 Turbo > Kaysville, Utah > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=244473#244473 > > > Attachments: > > http://forums.matronics.com//files/rotax_9_series_oil_change_129.pdf > > >


    Message 10


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:00:34 AM PST US
    From: kerrjohna@comcast.net
    Subject: Re: rudder trim tab
    Will, I did similar to Lowell with similar results. I place it lower on the rudder at the point of maximum bend so that I could use the geometry of the rudder to provide rigidity. One thing I have learned on the Hatz is that the rudder is neutral when aligned with the stabilizer offset, not with the centerline of the aircraft John Kerr ----- Original Message ----- From: Lowell Fitt Sent: Mon, 18 May 2009 02:38:59 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: Kitfox-List: rudder trim tab Will, I have been told by what I consider to be reliable sources that the engine mounts designed for the Kitfox engines has no thrust offset - zero offset, horizontal or vertical so right rudder is essentially built into the design. I went through this for the first five years of flight on my Model IV and had difficulty even considering a trim tab simply because it would look like a bandage. I finally did the deed and it made a world of difference, not only in cruise, but in the pattern as well. I hated right traffic patterns because I had real problems coordinating the right rudder pedal with a right turn. Everything just improved in bunches. My airplane is gone, but the trim tab was about six inches top to bottom and extended aft about an inch and a half or so. Overall it was triangular in shape with a trimmed base so it riveted to the trailing edge and the rib forward to prevent the trailing edge rivets from working as I adjusted it. My ribs were of the Speedster style with an airfoil on the horizontal so what I did there is drill through the rib and using a 4-40 blind nut from a hobby store on one side and a screw of trimmed length inserted through the tab. If you don't have the ribs in the rudder, I suppose you could go through the fabric a bit oversizes and then use a tubular spacer of the right length to accommodate the space between the 3/8" rib and the fabric, though that might not be necessary that far back. I couldn't find any clear photos, so made a drawing. As I recall, I bent the edges of the triangular portion inward a little bit to create a firm contact with the fabric to prevent air getting under and possibly lifting the tab. Lowell ----- Original Message ----- From: "william lurcott" Sent: Sunday, May 17, 2009 11:56 AM Subject: Kitfox-List: rudder trim tab Greetings, I have been reading the list here for a while, and want to take the opportunity to say thanks to all of you. I have a Series V with a Lycoming O-235 which is a great source of fun and unending lessons for me. There is one issue that I have, and that is that I must always input right rudder. I expect that at higher power settings, but at cruise? Anyway, I was wondering since the aircraft is already covered and flying is there some add-on type tab that I could affix to the rudder so that I don't have to constantly push on that right side. Cruise requires about 3-4 pounds or so of pressure. If someone has a photo or drawing, I would appreciate that too, as I am very visual. Thanks for any input. Will Lurcott Series V Lyc O-235 Flagler Beach, FL


    Message 11


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:20:03 AM PST US
    Subject: Video test
    From: "Tom Jones" <nahsikhs@elltel.net>
    This is my first try. Not much. Just a good hands off flying classic 4. http://vimeo.com/4708686?pg=transcoded_embed&sec=4708686 -------- Tom Jones Classic IV 503 Rotax, 72 inch Two blade Warp Ellensburg, WA Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=244529#244529


    Message 12


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:21:28 AM PST US
    From: Lynn Matteson <lynnmatt@jps.net>
    Subject: Re: Stuck Oil Filter
    Before I ever started my Jabiru, I used structural adhesive to attach a 4-leaf clover-type device to the top of the filter like the big boys do, and safety wired it. Since then, the filters have been so well secured, that I haven't bothered with any kind of securing other than to make sure that I give it one turn beyond gasket contact, per the Baldwin filter B33 instructions....so far, so good, with around 20-24 filter changes. Lynn Matteson Kitfox IV Speedster, taildragger Jabiru 2200, #2062, 655.4 hrs Sensenich 62x46 Wood prop Electroair direct-fire ignition system Status: flying On May 18, 2009, at 9:13 AM, Catz631@aol.com wrote: > Speaking of a stuck oil filter,during my last oil change I had > something quite different. I knew they could be a bugger to get off > so I fitted my oil filter removal tool but noticed the filter moved > before I even got the tool on ! The filter then spun off in my hand > with no effort at all ! That would have been a mess in flight if it > spun itself off ! Quite likely ,would have ruined my day! > I tightened it down per the factory instructions when I did the > prior oil change. I had the instructions right in front of me and > followed it to the letter (including the engine run and filter > tighten check) I told Dean at Lockwood about this and he said I was > one of two people he had heard of this happening to. > Well once is enough so I have installed a large hose clamp around > the filter (lined with rubber-Adel clamp like) and have safety > wired the clamp to the engine so the filter won't move (also torque > marked it) > > Dick Maddux > Fox > 4-1200 > 912 UL > > Pensacola,Fl > > > A Good Credit Score is 70001367178/aol?redir=http:// > www.freecreditreport.com/pm/default.aspx?sc=668072%26hmpgID=115% > 26bcd=Mayfooter51809NO115>See Yours in Just 2 Easy Steps! > www.matronics.com/contribution _- > ===========================================================


    Message 13


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:31:26 PM PST US
    From: "Ted Palamarek" <temco@telusplanet.net>
    Subject: Video test
    Tom For a first try ---- not bad. Great scenery. Nice simple but workable instrument panel. Thanks DO NOT ARCHIVE Ted Palamarek Edmonton, Ab -----Original Message----- From: owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Tom Jones Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 11:16 AM Subject: Kitfox-List: Video test This is my first try. Not much. Just a good hands off flying classic 4. http://vimeo.com/4708686?pg=transcoded_embed&sec=4708686 -------- Tom Jones Classic IV 503 Rotax, 72 inch Two blade Warp Ellensburg, WA Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=244529#244529


    Message 14


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:40:50 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Video test
    From: "Tom Jones" <nahsikhs@elltel.net>
    Heres a take off at about 980 pounds gross weight. http://www.vimeo.com/4711863 -------- Tom Jones Classic IV 503 Rotax, 72 inch Two blade Warp Ellensburg, WA Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=244537#244537


    Message 15


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:53:34 PM PST US
    From: KITFOXZ@aol.com
    Subject: Re: rudder trim tab
    Hello Will, My Ship is not yet flying but I wanted to chime in on this thread. I have always believed that an airplane should be built to fly straight and level first. My model building days (and my aeronautical engineer father) taught me to pay particular attention to true alignment and close to perfect airfoils in all aspects of building. A banana shaped fuselage is a curse one never will overcome. A warped wing will be more and more of a liability as the ship picks up speed in it's death spiral to mother earth. With a straight and true airframe accomplished first, the builder next tackles an engine mount. The engine's propeller will cause a torque turn in the opposite direction of the prop rotation. A shim in the engine mount is the best way to fix the problem in my book. I don't like the idea of having to change more than a little pitch trim when the engine quits. An airplane should glide straight in my opinion. If the engine quits, your hands are already full and I don't want to have to be standing on some rudder too, trying to overcome my trim tab. Actually, isn't a washer or two under the left engine mount to firewall points a heck of a lot easier than fabricating a trim tab? It's a lot less ugly! OK, I apologize, John, Lowell, Lynn, your trim tabs are beautiful but, isn't a simple washer for a little right thrust a solution to the point? If the airplane fly's straight and true naturally and as you add power the right thrust becomes more and more effective to counteract the very torque turn you are trying to kill in the first place. Isn't this a solution near to God and the birds? Dang propellers anyway! John John P. Marzluf Columbus, Ohio Outback (out back in the garage) In a message dated 5/17/2009 3:03:29 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, lurcottstudios@yahoo.com writes: Greetings, I have been reading the list here for a while, and want to take the opportunity to say thanks to all of you. I have a Series V with a Lycoming O-235 which is a great source of fun and unending lessons for me. There is one issue that I have, and that is that I must always input right rudder. I expect that at higher power settings, but at cruise? Anyway, I was wondering since the aircraft is already covered and flying is there some add-on type tab that I could affix to the rudder so that I don't have to constantly push on that right side. Cruise requires about 3-4 pounds or so of pressure. If someone has a photo or drawing, I would appreciate that too, as I am very visual. Thanks for any input. Will Lurcott Series V Lyc O-235 Flagler Beach, FL (http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List) (http://www.matronics.com/contribution) **************A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See Yours in Just 2 Easy Steps! =Mayfooter51809NO115)


    Message 16


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:58:02 PM PST US
    From: Lynn Matteson <lynnmatt@jps.net>
    Subject: Re: rudder trim tab
    Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't one reason to use the rudder trim to counteract, for instance, a crosswind while flying, thus removing the necessity to hold a little rudder to keep the ball centered? At least that's what I thought I was doing in building a cockpit- controlled trim tab. Lynn Matteson Kitfox IV Speedster, taildragger Jabiru 2200, #2062, 655.4 hrs Sensenich 62x46 Wood prop Electroair direct-fire ignition system Status: flying On May 18, 2009, at 6:51 PM, KITFOXZ@aol.com wrote: > Hello Will, > > My Ship is not yet flying but I wanted to chime in on this thread. > I have always believed that an airplane should be built to fly > straight and level first. My model building days (and my > aeronautical engineer father) taught me to pay particular > attention to true alignment and close to perfect airfoils in all > aspects of building. A banana shaped fuselage is a curse one never > will overcome. A warped wing will be more and more of a liability > as the ship picks up speed in it's death spiral to mother earth. > > With a straight and true airframe accomplished first, the builder > next tackles an engine mount. The engine's propeller will cause a > torque turn in the opposite direction of the prop rotation. A shim > in the engine mount is the best way to fix the problem in my book. > I don't like the idea of having to change more than a little pitch > trim when the engine quits. An airplane should glide straight in > my opinion. If the engine quits, your hands are already full and I > don't want to have to be standing on some rudder too, trying to > overcome my trim tab. > > Actually, isn't a washer or two under the left engine mount to > firewall points a heck of a lot easier than fabricating a trim > tab? It's a lot less ugly! > > OK, I apologize, John, Lowell, Lynn, your trim tabs are beautiful > but, isn't a simple washer for a little right thrust a solution to > the point? > > If the airplane fly's straight and true naturally and as you add > power the right thrust becomes more and more effective to > counteract the very torque turn you are trying to kill in the first > place. Isn't this a solution near to God and the birds? > > Dang propellers anyway! > > John > John P. Marzluf > Columbus, Ohio > Outback (out back in the garage) > > > In a message dated 5/17/2009 3:03:29 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, > lurcottstudios@yahoo.com writes: > Greetings, > I have been reading the list here for a while, and want to take the > opportunity to say thanks to all of you. I have a Series V with a > Lycoming O-235 which is a great source of fun and unending lessons > for me. There is one issue that I have, and that is that I must > always input right rudder. I expect that at higher power settings, > but at cruise? Anyway, I was wondering since the aircraft is > already covered and flying is there some add-on type tab that I > could affix to the rudder so that I don't have to constantly push > on that right side. Cruise requires about 3-4 pounds or so of > pressure. If someone has a photo or drawing, I would appreciate > that too, as I am very visual. Thanks for any input. > Will Lurcott > Series V > Lyc O-235 > Flagler Beach, FL > > ==================================== href="http://www.matronics.com/ > Navigator?Kitfox-List">http:// > www.matron==================================== > ms.matronics.com/">http://forums.matronics.com > ==================================== tp://www.matronics.com/ > contribution">http://www.matronics.com/contribution > =================================== > > A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See Yours in Just 2 Easy Steps! > www.matronics.com/contribution _- > ===========================================================


    Message 17


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:58:40 PM PST US
    From: "Lowell Fitt" <lcfitt@sbcglobal.net>
    Subject: Re: rudder trim tab
    John, I agree with you entirely. That is why I resisted the trim tab for so long. The washer idea didn't occur to me as I was a rank novice in the building and early flying stages. The trim tab just finally made sense and I did it and never regretted it. Since then, however, I have been thinking quite a bit about the whole issue. I am thinking of building my own engine mount with the offsets built into it, and I have been tinkering with a cockpit adustable rudder trim as I doubt a washer or two or an offset will completely negate any yaw tendency at all power settings. I guess this is as good a time as any to present my rudder trim system. I have a servo in the rudder that will warp the two bottom ribs giving a different cambered surface on one side or the other. The ribs are tied together so I will get an overcamber and undercamber on a desired side, or a symmetric surface on both sides controllable with a switch in the cockpit. Of course it has yet to fly, but it is something I have been thinking about long before the opportunity to build again came up. Lowell ----- Original Message ----- From: <KITFOXZ@aol.com> Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 3:51 PM Subject: Re: Kitfox-List: rudder trim tab > Hello Will, > > My Ship is not yet flying but I wanted to chime in on this thread. I > have > always believed that an airplane should be built to fly straight and > level > first. My model building days (and my aeronautical engineer father) > taught me to pay particular attention to true alignment and close to > perfect > airfoils in all aspects of building. A banana shaped fuselage is a curse > one > never will overcome. A warped wing will be more and more of a liability > as the ship picks up speed in it's death spiral to mother earth. > > With a straight and true airframe accomplished first, the builder next > tackles an engine mount. The engine's propeller will cause a torque turn > in > the opposite direction of the prop rotation. A shim in the engine mount > is > the best way to fix the problem in my book. I don't like the idea of > having to change more than a little pitch trim when the engine quits. An > airplane should glide straight in my opinion. If the engine quits, your > hands > are already full and I don't want to have to be standing on some rudder > too, > trying to overcome my trim tab. > > Actually, isn't a washer or two under the left engine mount to firewall > points a heck of a lot easier than fabricating a trim tab? It's a lot > less > ugly! > > OK, I apologize, John, Lowell, Lynn, your trim tabs are beautiful but, > isn't a simple washer for a little right thrust a solution to the point? > > If the airplane fly's straight and true naturally and as you add power > the > right thrust becomes more and more effective to counteract the very > torque > turn you are trying to kill in the first place. Isn't this a solution > near to God and the birds? > > Dang propellers anyway! > > John > John P. Marzluf > Columbus, Ohio > Outback (out back in the garage) > > > In a message dated 5/17/2009 3:03:29 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, > lurcottstudios@yahoo.com writes: > > Greetings, > I have been reading the list here for a while, and want to take the > opportunity to say thanks to all of you. I have a Series V with a > Lycoming O-235 > which is a great source of fun and unending lessons for me. There is one > issue that I have, and that is that I must always input right rudder. I > expect that at higher power settings, but at cruise? Anyway, I was > wondering > since the aircraft is already covered and flying is there some add-on > type > tab that I could affix to the rudder so that I don't have to constantly > push > on that right side. Cruise requires about 3-4 pounds or so of pressure. > If > someone has a photo or drawing, I would appreciate that too, as I am very > visual. Thanks for any input. > Will Lurcott > Series V > Lyc O-235 > Flagler Beach, FL > > > (http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List) > (http://www.matronics.com/contribution) > > > **************A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See Yours in Just 2 > Easy > Steps! > =Mayfooter51809NO115) >


    Message 18


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:08:56 PM PST US
    From: CDE2fly@aol.com
    Subject: Re: Stuck Oil Filter
    Lowell - I'm happy to report that the pipe wrench suggestion worked like a charm! In less than a minute on my way out the door for work this morning the filter was successfully removed - a pleasant alternative to the hour plus spent last night trying to mangle it off... The reason I was trying to remove it was to follow the instructions in the HomebuiltHelp video with regards to first start procedures. The video advises adding three quarts of oil to the tank then pulling the prop through numerous rotations while adding oil to oil line marked "out" via a funnel until oil discharges from the oil filter port (with the filter off) to purge air from the oil system. In a message dated 5/18/2009 11:15:30 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, lcfitt@sbcglobal.net writes: --> Kitfox-List message posted by: "Lowell Fitt" <lcfitt@sbcglobal.net> Darin, I appreciate the heads-up on this. I have not been aware of the information you mention. My thinking is that when removing the oil filter and the magnetic plug, oil will drain and the oil draining out of the engine at those points will result in something replacing the volumn of oil lost. This - most likely air. I guess if you are really quick, the air introduced will not be problematic. Also, when I changed the oil, I would use a vacuum drain apparatus that would suck the tank dry, I would then open the tank and wipe it out - this would be on the suction side. There was always a lot of silvery sludge there after one of the AVGas use periods. If I were to make a guess here, it would be that Rotax found that with the engines that were merely drained and refilled, like everything else out there, the no purging idea might be good for business, i.e. less complexity. I suppose with the new build, I will purge just like the old days. What I was trying to suggest in my original post was essentially that removeing the oil filter is not part of the purging process. Lowell ----- Original Message ----- From: "darinh" <gerns25@netscape.net> Sent: Sunday, May 17, 2009 9:40 PM Subject: Kitfox-List: Re: Stuck Oil Filter > > > lcfitt(at)sbcglobal.net wrote: >> Chris, >> >> ...Regarding purging the oil system. This is usually done after an oil >> change >> to purge any air that might have been introduced into the system during >> the >> oil change especially if the filter is changed or the magnetic plug is >> removed for inspection... >> >> --- > > > Lowell, > > According to Rotax-Owner.com you do not need to purge the oil system after > you do a simple oil change. Basically if you work on the suction side of > the system, you will need to purge the system. Yes, the tank is on the > suction side but as long as you don't remove the tank and drain the > suction line, you don't need to purge it. I have attached a Technical > Article from the site for anyones information. It does a good job of > describing the oils system, the SI's that have been put out by Rotax and > examples of when oil purging is required. Take it for what it is worth > but this is what they have to say about purging and oil changes. I > personally have purged my system after each oil change but to be quite > honest, I have never had a situation where the lifters had air in the > either before or after the oil change. > > -------- > Darin Hawkes > Series 7 > 914 Turbo > Kaysville, Utah > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=244473#244473 > > > Attachments: > > http://forums.matronics.com//files/rotax_9_series_oil_change_129.pdf > > > **************A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See Yours in Just 2 Easy Steps! =Mayfooter51809NO115)


    Message 19


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:43:44 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: rudder trim tab
    From: "JetPilot" <orcabonita@hotmail.com>
    There is nothing wrong with trim tabs. All sorts of much more advanced and high performance aircraft use trim tabs. Johns washer idea is a good one, but I doubt it will be enough, and even when you get close to correct, you will still probably get yaw changes with power, which is exactly why many manufactured aircraft have rudder trim. Even modern jet airliners have rudder trim... The theory of building a perfectly straight airplane is good and something to strive for, but the reality is that you will still probably need a trim tab in the end. An electric adjustable rudder tab is even better... Mike -------- &quot;NO FEAR&quot; - If you have no fear you did not go as fast as you could have !!! Kolb MK-III Xtra, 912-S Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=244575#244575


    Message 20


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:46:08 PM PST US
    From: patrick reilly <patreilly43@hotmail.com>
    Subject: Cutting 2/12in. hole in Plexiglass doors
    I also used a hole saw on mine. But=2C I did it flat before the plexi was a ttached. I also used a heat gun to heat the plexi first. I am sorry I can't remember what degree I heated to and checked with a laser thermometer=2C m aybe 150-160 degrees F. After you sand the edge=2C you can use a propane to rch on the edge that gives you an excellent edge. Just practice on a scrap piece 1st to get your temps right.. Pat Reilly Mod 3 582 Rebuild Rockford=2C IL From: Catz631@aol.com Subject: Re: Kitfox-List: Cutting 2/12in. hole in Plexiglass doors I used a hole saw. I went very slow and carefully and it worked fine. I t hen finished the holes with about 4-600 grit paper. Both holes turned out very nice with no cracks. The ventilation increase is a must here in hot=2Csteamy=2Cmuggy=2C Florida . I took a picture of the location of the vent on the factory Apollo Fox wh ich is out of Tampa =2CFl. (at Sun and Fun) I figured they probably had the best location for the vent figured out. They did. Dick Maddux Fox 4-1200 Pensacola=2CFl A Good Credit Score is 70001367178/aol?redir=http://www.freecreditreport. com/pm/default.aspx?sc=668072%26hmpgID=115%26bcd=Mayfooter51809NO115> See Yours in Just 2 Easy Steps!


    Message 21


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:06:52 PM PST US
    From: CDE2fly@aol.com
    Subject: 912S Choke Return Springs
    I'm getting ready for the first start on a 912S and notice that the choke return springs aren't strong enough to return the choke levers to the "off" position following release of the of the choke pull ring. Has anyone replaced the stock springs with ones that are a bit stronger? If so, where can I find them? The throttle return springs look like they might work but haven't tried them yet on the choke levers. Chris Kitfox 7 912S **************A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See Yours in Just 2 Easy Steps! =Mayfooter51809NO115)


    Message 22


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:12:08 PM PST US
    Subject: Kitfox - how high have you gone ?
    From: "dave" <dave@cfisher.com>
    Took mine to 15k today and it was still going. Maybe I take a bottle next time and see higher . non turbo 582 whoa !! I created one here http://rotaxaircraft.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=29&t=122 Dave 15,143 my record on that 582 -- Lets see who got what . -------- Rotax Dealer, Ontario Canada http://www.cfisher.com/ Awesome *New Forum * http://rotaxaircraft.com/forum/ Realtime Kitfox movies to separate the internet chatter from the truth http://www.youtube.com/profile_videos?user=kitfoxflyer Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=244579#244579


    Message 23


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:38:57 PM PST US
    From: KITFOXZ@aol.com
    Subject: Re: rudder trim tab
    Lynn, Lowell and Mike, others lurking, I didn't mean to condemn trim tabs and especially cockpit controlled trim tabs. The point I was hoping to make is that I feel the emphasis should be on building a good airframe that is straight and true. I don't want to have a bird that is all bent up and those imperfections compensated for with hairy items hanging off of every control surface. These are harsh sounding words I know. I am just trying to make the point with exaggerations. Engine torque is proportional to power setting and so is the resultant yaw. I want to cancel it immediately at it's source with engine thrust line offset. Washers, shims, another engine mount perhaps, are the cleaner ways to make an airplane fly straight. What I want to accomplish is a glide that is straight and true first and then do what has to be done to make the engine pull it in as straight of a path as can be done even with the imperfections of that rotating, torque inducing, P factor producing, wind mill out in front. Of course a cockpit controlled trim tab is used for cross wind trim and elevator trim is used for load CG variations. But, to permanently bend a control surface to make up for a faulty thrust line is wrong I feel. If your car has a front end alignment problem, do you alter the rear axle alignment to make it go down the road straight? --Albeit in a crab angle? I love this forum because there are so many points of view that can get aired. Dead horses are beaten. Feelings are even stepped on but, when it all is tallied up some do and don't are discovered. Some best practices are established and airplanes end up flying. Got to turn in for the night. John John P. Marzluf Columbus, Ohio Outback (out back in the garage) In a message dated 5/18/2009 9:44:39 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, orcabonita@hotmail.com writes: --> Kitfox-List message posted by: "JetPilot" <orcabonita@hotmail.com> There is nothing wrong with trim tabs. All sorts of much more advanced and high performance aircraft use trim tabs. Johns washer idea is a good one, but I doubt it will be enough, and even when you get close to correct, you will still probably get yaw changes with power, which is exactly why many manufactured aircraft have rudder trim. Even modern jet airliners have rudder trim... The theory of building a perfectly straight airplane is good and something to strive for, but the reality is that you will still probably need a trim tab in the end. An electric adjustable rudder tab is even better... Mike -------- &quot;NO FEAR&quot; - If you have no fear you did not go as fast as you could have !!! Kolb MK-III Xtra, 912-S Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=244575#244575 **************A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See Yours in Just 2 Easy Steps! =Mayfooter51809NO115)


    Message 24


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:52:06 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Kitfox - how high have you gone ?
    From: sourdostan@aol.com
    My Model IV Speedster with a 912ul (80 hp) goes right up to 18k--no problem. Also helps that I start at 5600 ft. and I'm used to the altitude. Stan Specht Lakewood , CO -----Original Message----- From: dave <dave@cfisher.com> Sent: Mon, 18 May 2009 8:11 pm Subject: Kitfox-List: Kitfox - how high have you gone ? Took mine to 15k today and it was still going. Maybe I take a bottle next time and see higher . non turbo 582 whoa !! I created one here http://rotaxaircraft.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=29&t=122 Dave 15,143 my record on that 582 -- Lets see who got what . -------- Rotax Dealer, Ontario Canada http://www.cfisher.com/ Awesome *New Forum * http://rotaxaircraft.com/forum/ Realtime Kitfox movies to separate the internet chatter from the truth http://www.youtube.com/profile_videos?user=kitfoxflyer Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=244579#244579


    Message 25


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:05:46 PM PST US
    Subject: Runaway plane - serious mishap - throttle cable
    From: "rcsfca" <r66rc-matronics@yahoo.com>
    My Model IV - 1200 Rotax 912UL suffered major wing and prop damage today after striking the corner and face of a concrete hangar due to a throttle cable malfunction. After a normal start this morning at my own hangar, I taxied across the airport (CCR) to the local avionics FBO for some radio and GPS work. Following a 15 minute inspection of the proposed panel changes, the techs asked me to move the plane to an adjacent hangar. I started the engine, which roared to life at full throttle (6000 rpm?) in a heartbeat, and the plane snapped forward into a circular move even though I was firm on the brakes. (It swung in a circle because I had some left rudder into it, which was lucky because I had other aircraft parked in front of me on the ramp.) Thinking that somehow the throttle had been pushed in (which it hadn't because I had double-checked it for an idle setting before cranking the starter), I pulled back on the throttle and it came out of its housing and into my hand. Three seconds later, the plane hit the building, caving in the right wing and shearing the IVO composite prop. Turning off the magnetos was too late. There was no fire and I was not injured, and there was plenty of help around to handle the leaking gasoline from the wing tank. But the wing, flaperon, and prop are finished. The balance of the plane, interestingly enough, was undamaged. The steel frame will have to be checked for squareness but the wind spar and wood absorbed the impact. The problem with the throttle is as follows: My plane, built in 1994, has the bellcrank-style throttle control, which divides the forward and reverse motion of the throttle handle between the two carbs. The throttle handle is attached to the bellcrank by a stiff steel 1/16" rod that runs from the backend of the throttle handle to a hole in the bellcrank mechanism where it is secured by a set screw retainer. What happened in my case was that - unknown to me - the rod was completely straight and ran through the retainer hole with neither a secondary safety retainer on the other side of the hole nor a 90+ degree bend in the rod on the other side of the hole to keep the rod from being pulled out in the event the primary retainer set screw let loose. So this morning the (single) set screw let go, the throttles on the carbs went to their default full-power position (WOT), and when I pulled back on the handle, the steel rod slid out of its bellcrank retainer and the whole throttle handle ended up in my hand. An important suggestion to any of the owners out there who have this type of throttle control: - Immediately check your rod-to-bellcrank retention screw for tightness. - Get a secondary retainer on the rod. - Put a bend into the rod after the secondary retainer to allow the rod to hook the bellcrank in case of retainer failure. - Purchase the Kitfox Aircraft replacement throttle cable ($219) that does not use the bellcrank at all - it is a twin-cable style control of a completely different design. Hope this has been complete enough - maybe there's been something AD-related already published or a prior thread. It has been a long hard day but I don't want any members of the community to not know about the incident in case their throttle equipment is the same as mine. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=244594#244594


    Message 26


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:29:56 PM PST US
    From: "JC Propeller Design" <propellerdesign@tele2.se>
    Subject: Re: rudder trim tab
    Lynn, you do not compensate for crosswind with the trim tab, you move along with the mass of air (steady air) at the same speed as it blows, if you don't go directly in to the wind or with the wind, you have to compensate for the drift over ground by alter your course. The rudder compensate for propeller effect and different aileron drag from left side to right side when airplane is unbalanced in weight distribution (fuel or people) The trim tab just take the load off the controls. Jan ----- Original Message ----- From: "Lynn Matteson" <lynnmatt@jps.net> Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2009 2:35 AM Subject: Re: Kitfox-List: rudder trim tab > > Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't one reason to use the rudder trim to > counteract, for instance, a crosswind while flying, thus removing the > necessity to hold a little rudder to keep the ball centered? At least > that's what I thought I was doing in building a cockpit- controlled trim > tab. > > Lynn Matteson > Kitfox IV Speedster, taildragger > Jabiru 2200, #2062, 655.4 hrs > Sensenich 62x46 Wood prop > Electroair direct-fire ignition system > Status: flying > > > On May 18, 2009, at 6:51 PM, KITFOXZ@aol.com wrote: > >> Hello Will, >> >> My Ship is not yet flying but I wanted to chime in on this thread. I >> have always believed that an airplane should be built to fly straight >> and level first. My model building days (and my aeronautical engineer >> father) taught me to pay particular attention to true alignment and >> close to perfect airfoils in all aspects of building. A banana shaped >> fuselage is a curse one never will overcome. A warped wing will be more >> and more of a liability as the ship picks up speed in it's death spiral >> to mother earth. >> >> With a straight and true airframe accomplished first, the builder next >> tackles an engine mount. The engine's propeller will cause a torque >> turn in the opposite direction of the prop rotation. A shim in the >> engine mount is the best way to fix the problem in my book. I don't >> like the idea of having to change more than a little pitch trim when the >> engine quits. An airplane should glide straight in my opinion. If the >> engine quits, your hands are already full and I don't want to have to be >> standing on some rudder too, trying to overcome my trim tab. >> >> Actually, isn't a washer or two under the left engine mount to firewall >> points a heck of a lot easier than fabricating a trim tab? It's a lot >> less ugly! >> >> OK, I apologize, John, Lowell, Lynn, your trim tabs are beautiful but, >> isn't a simple washer for a little right thrust a solution to the point? >> >> If the airplane fly's straight and true naturally and as you add power >> the right thrust becomes more and more effective to counteract the very >> torque turn you are trying to kill in the first place. Isn't this a >> solution near to God and the birds? >> >> Dang propellers anyway! >> >> John >> John P. Marzluf >> Columbus, Ohio >> Outback (out back in the garage) >> >> >> In a message dated 5/17/2009 3:03:29 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, >> lurcottstudios@yahoo.com writes: >> Greetings, >> I have been reading the list here for a while, and want to take the >> opportunity to say thanks to all of you. I have a Series V with a >> Lycoming O-235 which is a great source of fun and unending lessons for >> me. There is one issue that I have, and that is that I must always input >> right rudder. I expect that at higher power settings, but at cruise? >> Anyway, I was wondering since the aircraft is already covered and flying >> is there some add-on type tab that I could affix to the rudder so that I >> don't have to constantly push on that right side. Cruise requires about >> 3-4 pounds or so of pressure. If someone has a photo or drawing, I would >> appreciate that too, as I am very visual. Thanks for any input. >> Will Lurcott >> Series V >> Lyc O-235 >> Flagler Beach, FL >> >> ==================================== href="http://www.matronics.com/ >> Navigator?Kitfox-List">http:// >> www.matron==================================== >> ms.matronics.com/">http://forums.matronics.com >> ==================================== tp://www.matronics.com/ >> contribution">http://www.matronics.com/contribution >> =================================== >> >> A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See Yours in Just 2 Easy Steps! >> www.matronics.com/contribution _- >> =========================================================== > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus > signature database 4083 (20090518) __________ > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. > > >




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   kitfox-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/Kitfox-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/kitfox-list
  • Browse Kitfox-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/kitfox-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --