Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 03:29 AM - Re: Sky Scout... (Jack)
     2. 03:47 AM - Re: Steerable tailwheel- hooked to rudder (bill55)
     3. 04:23 AM - Re: Red Betsy - on to Boscobel (helspersew@aol.com)
     4. 04:33 AM - Re: Re: Steerable tailwheel- hooked to rudder (H RULE)
     5. 04:37 AM - Re: Re: Steerable tailwheel- hooked to rudder (helspersew@aol.com)
     6. 04:57 AM - Re: Sky Scout... (Kip and Beth Gardner)
     7. 06:11 AM - Sky Scout... (Oscar Zuniga)
     8. 06:40 AM - Re: Re: Steerable tailwheel- hooked to rudder (Jim Ash)
     9. 06:51 AM - Dick's new Piet (Douwe Blumberg)
    10. 07:13 AM - Re: Steerable tailwheel- hooked to rudder (Skip Gadd)
    11. 07:22 AM - Doesn't the GN-1 Grega have a beefed up rudder to steer the tailwheel ? (Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXD0)[ASRC Aerospace Corporation])
    12. 07:40 AM - Re: Re: Steerable tailwheel- hooked to rudder (David Paule)
    13. 07:48 AM - Re: Steerable tailwheel- hooked to rudder (Jeff Boatright)
    14. 08:09 AM - Dick's two cylinder Harley engine (Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXD0)[ASRC Aerospace Corporation])
    15. 08:09 AM - Re: Doesn't the GN-1 Grega have a beefed up rudder to steer the tailwheel ? (Skip Gadd)
    16. 08:12 AM - Newest Piet video (Jeff Boatright)
    17. 08:12 AM - Sky Scout... (santiago morete)
    18. 08:15 AM - Re: Steerable tailwheel- hooked to rudder (Rick Holland)
    19. 08:19 AM - Piet Pitts Death Ray (Jeff Boatright)
    20. 08:21 AM - Re: Steerable tailwheel- hooked to rudder (Gary Boothe)
    21. 08:38 AM - Re: Piet Pitts Death Ray (Jeff Boatright)
    22. 08:39 AM - Outstanding video Jeff ! Piet Pitts Death Ray (Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXD0)[ASRC Aerospace Corporation])
    23. 08:53 AM - Re: Red Betsy - on to Boscobel (taildrags)
    24. 09:02 AM - Re: Sky Scout... (Rick Holland)
    25. 09:13 AM - Re: Sky Scout... (Jeff Boatright)
    26. 09:26 AM - Re: Dick's two cylinder Harley engine (Dick N)
    27. 09:29 AM - Re: Outstanding video Jeff ! Piet Pitts Death Ray (Jeff Boatright)
    28. 09:32 AM - Re: Dick's new Piet (Dick N)
    29. 09:39 AM - Re: Re: Steerable tailwheel- hooked to rudder (Jim Ash)
    30. 09:40 AM - Re: Dick's two cylinder Harley engine (Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXD0)[ASRC Aerospace Corporation])
    31. 10:02 AM - Re: Dick's new Piet (Jim Markle)
    32. 10:02 AM - Re: Dick's two cylinder Harley engine (Rick Holland)
    33. 10:43 AM - Re: Steerable tailwheel- hooked to rudder (Skip Gadd)
    34. 10:45 AM - Re: Sky Scout... (taildrags)
    35. 11:12 AM - Re: Re: Sky Scout... (Jeff Boatright)
    36. 11:13 AM - Re: Sky Scout... (David Paule)
    37. 11:25 AM - Re: Sky Scout... (taildrags)
    38. 12:25 PM - Re: Re: Sky Scout... (David Paule)
    39. 12:55 PM - Re: Sky Scout... (Bill Church)
    40. 01:04 PM - Re: Re: Steerable tailwheel- hooked to rudder (David Paule)
    41. 01:54 PM - Re: Sky Scout... (Ray Krause)
    42. 01:54 PM - Re: Sky Scout... (Ray Krause)
    43. 01:55 PM - Re: Sky Scout... (Ray Krause)
    44. 02:04 PM - Re: Re: Steerable tailwheel- hooked to rudder (Ray Krause)
    45. 02:37 PM - Re: Dick's two cylinder Harley engine (Bill Church)
    46. 02:58 PM - Re: Dick's two cylinder Harley engine (dwilson)
    47. 03:52 PM - another Russian Aircamper (Michael Silvius)
    48. 03:52 PM - Re: Sky Scout... (Dave Abramson)
    49. 03:56 PM - Re: Sky Scout... (Ray Krause)
    50. 04:55 PM - Re: Re: Steerable tailwheel- hooked to rudder (Jim Ash)
    51. 05:44 PM - Re: laminating struts and tv (dgaldrich)
    52. 05:54 PM - Tailwheel & shimmy (santiago morete)
    53. 06:58 PM - Re: Tailwheel & shimmy (Clif Dawson)
    54. 06:59 PM - Sky Scout.."Glue" question? (Ray Krause)
    55. 07:50 PM - Re: Steerable tailwheel- hooked to rudder (Gene Rambo)
    56. 07:52 PM - Re: Tailwheel & shimmy (Gary Boothe)
    57. 07:53 PM - Re: Sky Scout.."Glue" question? (Gene Rambo)
    58. 08:54 PM - Tailwheel & shimmy (santiago morete)
 
 
 
Message 1
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      Ray,
      
      You could consider a built up spar like attached.  They are a lot of 
      work
      but strong and just a bit less expensive that solid.  There are more
      pictures at www.textors.com.
      
      Jack
      
      DSM
      
      
      Thanks, Gary.
      
      
      The wing is exactly the same, except 27" shorter.  Routing would be a 
      lot of
      work, but doable.  The ribs I got with the other wood are all built and 
      seem
      to be made for the 1" spar.  I will have to make a decision on which way 
      to
      go.
      
      
      I have been putting in hard points in the fuselage for the seat and 
      shoulder
      safety belts; thankfully I only need one set!  I put the hard pints one
      station behind the seat, so I will have to find the right seat belts to 
      fit.
      ACS has some that might work, when I get that far.  Got the turtle deck
      mostly done today, that was fun.
      
      
      Thanks for the help.
      
      
      Ray Krause
      
      
      P.S. Guess I will have to take the Waiex to the Peit fly in.
      
      
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      
      From: Gary Boothe <mailto:gboothe5@comcast.net>  
      
      
      Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 7:59 PM
      
      Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Sky Scout...
      
      
      No problem, Ray. I took your meaning to be, would the same information 
      apply
      to a Sky Scout. Having never seen Sky Scout plans, I could not say, with
      real authority, that a =BE=94 spar is OK for the Sky Scout; however, it 
      is my
      understanding that the two airplanes are very similar, maybe even the 
      same
      wing. Lots of conversations on this list point out that vintage aircraft
      such as the T-craft or Piper Cub, have used an assortment of spar 
      materials,
      =BE=94 thick. It is my recollection that the same conversation led to 
      the
      agreement that, after routing, you basically end up with a =BE=94 spar, 
      anyhow. 
      
      
      Please, someone (I know this is a bashful group), if I have mis-directed
      Ray, please jump in!
      
      
      Gary Boothe
      
      Cool, CA
      
      Pietenpol
      
      WW Corvair Conversion
      
      Tail done, Fuselage on gear
      
      18 ribs done
      
      
      From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Ray 
      Krause
      Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 12:29 PM
      Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Sky Scout...
      
      
      Gary,
      
      
      Thanks.  I became confused answering all the e-mails that I started with
      these questions.  I know that you are building an Air Camper!  Thanks 
      for
      the info on the spars.
      
      
      Ray Krause
      
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      
      From: gboothe5@comcast.net 
      
      
      Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 12:15 PM
      
      Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Sky Scout...
      
      
      Negative. 
      
      Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
      
      
        _____  
      
      
      From: "Ray Krause" <raykrause@frontiernet.net> 
      
      
      
      Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Sky Scout...
      
      
      Gary,
      
      
      Thanks for the information.  If = using the 3/4"  spar material, 
      would I
      still rout out the spar as shown in the = plans?  Are  you 
      building a Sky
      Scout?
      
      
      Ray Krause
      
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      
      From:  gboothe5@comcast.net 
      
      
      Sent: Tuesday, February 23, = 2010 9:15  AM
      
      Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: = Sky  Scout...
      
      
      Ray,
      
      FYI...3/4" is an acceptable dimension for = spars.  
      
      Gary 
      
      Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
      
      
        _____  
      
      
      From: "Ray Krause" <raykrause@frontiernet.net&g= t;  
      
      
      
      Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Sky Scout...
      
      
      Thanks, Gary.
      
      
      I will accept your humility with a = =3D grain  of=3D20 salt!  
      Your
      beautiful workmanship attests to your =3D  abilities!
      
      
      The point about laminating to avoid = =3D wood  defects 
      is=3D20 well
      taken,  I will follow suit.  After = computing the  costs of =3D 
      the=3D20
      metal struts, I am leaning towards the wood = struts!  As  far as 
      the =3D
      spars=3D20 go, they were included in the wood I got = with the 
      Sky  Scout
      package; =3D they are=3D20 spruce.  But rather than the 1" = 
      thickness, 
      they are 3/4", I think I =3D will=3D20 sandwich then with two pieces 
      = of
      1/8" birch  plywood to get the 1" (so =3D they fit=3D20 the 
      ribs).  = The
      Hughes Hardwood =3D place in=3D20 Chico = had beautiful  
      parallel grain
      fir that would have made beautiful =3D spars,=3D20 = cheap,  
      too.  Next
      time I am in Chico, I will check out the =3D = hickory. =3D20  
      The ash
      seems to be really dense/heavy (stronger than hickory?).  = I 
      =3D 
      will=3D20 try to look it up.
      
      
      Thanks for the response. And yes, I = =3D have  
      referenced=3D20 Chris's
      web site and printed many photos.... but it = makes my  eyes and 
      =3D
      brain=3D20 hurt!
      
      
      Ray
      
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      
      From:=3D20 Gary=3D20  Boothe  
      
      
      Sent: Monday, February 22, 2010 =3D = 3:17=3D20 PM
      
      Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: =3D Sky=3D20 = Scout...
      
      
      Ray,
      
      Your=3D20 questions are intelligent and = educated=3D85.attributes 
      to 
      which I make =3D no personal=3D20 claim. In all honesty, I perused 
      = the
      West  Coast Piet web site to =3D exhaustion.=3D20 Too bad Chris 
      Tracy 
      doesn=3D92t have  sponsors, or he=3D92d be a rich man! =3D 
      After=3D20
      looking at every = application  of wood strut that has been built 
      and is
      =3D flying,=3D20 I decided = it was  doable. Conversations 
      about
      appropriate woods went =3D from ash=3D20 = to spruce,  
      including hickory.
      I decided that I liked the look of =3D hickory = and=3D20 the  
      decision
      was that easy. For size, I just used the plans dimensions = =3D 
      for=3D20 
      steel. 
      
      Later=3D20 conversations with another builder (either = Cliff  
      Dawson or
      Douwe =3D Blumberg),=3D20 far  more intelligent and = educated 
      than  I,
      showed published =3D strengths of=3D20 various woods, and = 
      verified that 
      hickory had plenty of strength for =3D our=3D20 purposes. I think I 
      = can
      find  that email, but it=3D92s on my other =3D computer 
      at=3D20 home.  
      
      My=3D20 wing struts will also be hickory, roughly the = shape 
      and  size on
      the =3D plans.=3D20 Connections will surely be similar to = 
      Douwe=3D92s.
      All  cabanes and wing =3D struts are=3D20 laminated 
      because=3D85.that=3D92s what everyone  does! Really, it gives 
      you =3D
      an=3D20 opportunity to rotate the = grain and  eliminate the 
      possibility
      of =3D having a weak=3D20 link. Also, it = looks really  cool!
      
      My=3D20 wood source is a local hardwood supplier, in = Auburn, 
      Ca 
      (California=3D20 Hardwoods), who does his own wholesale purchasing = 
      in
      whatever  length =3D and size=3D20 needed. He even mills, if 
      necessary. He
      = located my fir  spars and sold =3D all four=3D20 for $185!! 
      Bonus is
      that he helped = build some  wood airplanes and knows =3D 
      what=3D20 grains
      to look = for.
      
      Further=3D20 note:  If anything goes wrong, = I=3D92ll blame  
      Chris Tracy
      for =3D publishing all=3D20 those = photos!
      
      Gary=3D20 Boothe
      
      Cool,=3D20 CA
      
      Pietenpol
      
      WW=3D20 Corvair Conversion
      
      Tail=3D20 done, Fuselage on gear
      
      18=3D20 ribs done
      
      From:=3D20  owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com=3D20 
      [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of = 
      =3D 
      Ray=3D20 Krause
      Sent: Monday, February 22, 2010 1:51  PM
      Subject: = Re:  Pietenpol-List: =3D Sky=3D20 = Scout...
      
      Gary,
      
      If I  made =3D these 22"=3D20 struts (front/center) from metal, 
      they would
      = weigh 22+  ounces without =3D the=3D20 ends. How did you 
      decide on the 
      thickness and shape  for the struts? =3D Why did=3D20 you chose 
      Hickory
      versus, say = ash?  Did  you laminate because you =3D 
      needed=3D20 to get
      to a certain = thickness, or for  strength?  There is a =3D 
      source
      for=3D20 hickory and ash that = has 2" (8/4)  material in Chico, 
      I think.
      I =3D got some=3D20 1" ash for = 2.37 per board  foot.
      
      Are  your =3D "flying=3D20 struts" (the long struts) also 
      hickory?  
      What=3D20  shape?
      
      Thanks,
      
      Ray=3D20 Krause.
      
      P.S.  The =3D aerostream=3D20 tubing is very expensive, about 
      $56.00 per 
      front strut  ($28.00/ft and =3D .7593=3D20 lbs/ft). Wicks has it 
      for
      $17.00/ft = right now. I  am not sure of its =3D quality.=3D20 
      None of the
      aerotubing matches = the  recommended sizes on the plans (1.5 
      =3D X
      .75=3D20 and 2" X  1").
      
      -----  =3D Original=3D20 Message ----- 
      
      From: Gary=3D20 Boothe  
      
      
      Sent: =3D  Monday, February=3D20 22, 2010 7:31 AM
      
      Subject:  RE:=3D20 Pietenpol-List: Sky Scout...
      
      Ray,
      
      I had a couple free minutes before I took = =3D off for  
      the=3D20 week. It
      took 10 seconds to pull off one of the rear = cabanes. It =3D 
      measures=3D20 21" end-to-end, and weighs 18 oz (had to use the 
      postal=3D20  scales!).
      
      Gary Boothe
      
      Cool, Ca.
      
      Pietenpol
      
      WW Corvair Conversion, =3D = mounted
      
      Tail done, Fuselage on gear
      
      (18 ribs down=3D85)
      
      -----Original Message-----
      From: = owner-pi= etenpol=3D  
      -list-server@matronics.com=3D20 
      [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of 
      Ray=3D20  Krause
      Sent: Sunday, February 21, 2010 8:54 PM
      To:=3D20  pietenpol-list@matronics.com
      Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: = Sky=3D20  Scout...
      
      <raykrause@frontiernet.net>
      
      Shad,
      
      Thanks for the comments on the = struts.  =3D I  will=3D20 
      probably go
      with the 4130 
      
      struts from Wicks.  It is just that I = =3D  really=3D20 enjoy 
      the wood
      working.  If the 
      
      wood were comparable, I would maybe go = that=3D20  way.
      
      I would appreciate the Dillsburg Aero =3D  Reference. =3D20 The 
      size of
      the metal 
      
      struts is included in the plans; so I can = =3D probably  
      get=3D20 pretty
      close to the 
      
      right size.
      
      Thanks for your help.
      
      Ray Krause
      
      ----- Original Message ----- = 
      
      From: "shad bell"=3D20  <aviatorbell@yahoo.com>
      
      To:=3D20  <pietenpol-list@matronics.com>
      
      Sent: Saturday, February 20, 2010 = 5:33=3D20  PM
      
      Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Sky=3D20  Scout...
      
      > --> Pietenpol-List message posted = =3D by:  shad=3D20 bell
      <aviatorbell@yahoo.com>
      
      > 
      
      > 
      
      > Ray, I am not 100% sure but I would = bet =3D  wooden=3D20 
      struts are
      heavier than 
      
      > streamlined tube.  The bolts, = and =3D steel  end=3D20 
      fittings that
      would be 
      
      > required add up fast.  As for = the =3D  older=3D20 metal 
      designation,
      just usse 4130, 
      
      > If you need I can see what dimensions = =3D ours  are,=3D20 
      some where
      in the 2 inch 
      
      > by 9/16 (minor axis) .049 wall =3D  thickness. =3D20 also 
      check
      dillsburg aero works = 
      
      > for tube prices, wicks is also having = a =3D  special=3D20 
      "sale" on
      streamlined 
      
      > tubing of some dimensions.  I = can =3D look  up=3D20 the 
      number for
      Dillsburg Aero 
      
      > Works in PA if you need me to, I have = a =3D  price=3D20 
      list out in my
      hanger, he 
      
      > does not have a web =3D = site.
      
      > 
      
      > 
      
      > Shad
      
      > 
      
      > 
      
      > 
      
      > 
      
      > 
      
      > 
      
      > 
      
      > 
      
      
      <=3D
      /PRE>
      http://
      www.mat=3D
      ronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List
      &
      lt;=3D
      B><=3D
      /PRE>
      http://forums.matronics.com=3D
      <=3D
      /PRE>
      =3D
      http://www.matronic
      s.com/c=3D
      ontribution
      <=3D
      /PRE>
      
      
      href=3D3D"http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List">http://ww=
      
      w.mat=3D
      ronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List
      href=3D3D"http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com
      
      href=3D3D"http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.=
      
      com/c=3D
      
      
      3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=
      3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D
      3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=
      3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D
      3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=
      3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D
      3D
      href=3D'3D"http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List"'>http://w
      ww
      .matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List
      3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=
      3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D
      3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=
      3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D
      3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=
      3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D
      3D
      href=3D'3D"http://forums.matronics.com"'>http://forums.matronics.com
      3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=
      3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D
      3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=
      3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D
      3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=
      3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D
      3D
      href=3D'3D"http://www.matronics.com/contribution"'>http://www.matronics
      .c
      om/contribution
      3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=
      3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D
      3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=
      3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D
      3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=
      3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D
      3D
      
      
      ~=B2=03r
      
      
      3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
      3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3
      D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
      3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
      href='3D"http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List"'>http://www
      .matr
      onics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List
      3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
      3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3
      D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
      3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
      href='3D"http://forums.matronics.com"'>http://forums.matronics.com
      3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
      3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3
      D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
      3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
      href='3D"http://www.matronics.com/contribution"'>http://www.matronics.c
      om/co
      ntribution
      3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
      3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3
      D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
      3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
      
      
      ~=B2 
      
      
        _____  
      
      
      r 
      
      
      http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List
      http://forums.matronics.com
      http://www.matronics.com/contribution
      
      
      href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List">http://www.mat
      ronic
      s.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List
      href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com
      href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/c
      
      
Message 2
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Steerable tailwheel- hooked to rudder | 
      
      
      Dan,
      
      We just finished and test flew the Model A powered Sky Scout based in Brodhead
      (this past November) and originally had the tail skid.  It did not take long to
      realize we needed a steerable tail wheel!  We used a Ken Perkins design (due
      to time constraint) and attached to the lower rudder with light springs (as Dennis
      Hall on his Aircamper).  The process worked great except for the full swivel
      design of the tail wheel.  I machined that out and the airplane flys and
      ground handles great.  Feel free to check it out at Brodhead as anyone knows how
      to get into my hangar.  I was always apprehensive about the horns on the lower
      rudder but am convinced this is logical solution (and possibly lighter?) 
      
      Bill Liimatainen
      Monroe, Wisconsin
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=288111#288111
      
      
Message 3
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Red Betsy - on to Boscobel | 
      
      
      Hi Gerry,
      
      Thanks for that historical link. I myself love history, and especially enj
      oy reading the logs and accounts of James Cook and William Bligh, and the
       like. I am always amazed at how little things and people really change.
       I guess you can't take the human being out of the human.
      
      Dan
      
      
      -----Original Message-----
      From: Gerry Holland <gholland@content-stream.co.uk>
      Sent: Thu, Feb 25, 2010 12:58 am
      Subject: Pietenpol-List: Red Betsy - on to Boscobel
      
      
      Dan Hi from UK.
      I digress......
      I spotted the word Boscobel in your e-mail and instantly went back to the
       early 60=99s when I joined the Royal Air Force.
      Initial Training started at RAF Cosford in the West Midlands with the Stat
      ion Emblem referred to as the Boscobel Oak.
      Nearby was the Village of Boscobel and in true military style we all march
      ed to see what was purported to be the Royal Oak in the Village. I
      =99m guessing Boscobel, WI must have some roots back to that Shropshire Vi
      llage.
      King Charles hid in the Oak and a nearby Manor House from the pursuing Tro
      ops of Oliver Cromwell. Those were the days.....politics had a bit of a bi
      te and you could lose your head!
      
      Some information:
      
      http://www.timetravel-britain.com/articles/houses/boscobel.shtml
      
      Regards
      Gerry
      
      do not archive
      
      
      ========================
      ===========
      -=          - The Pietenpol-List Email Forum -
      -= Use the Matronics List Features Navigator to browse
      -= the many List utilities such as List Un/Subscription,
      -= Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ,
      -= Photoshare, and much much more:
      -
      -=   --> http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List
      -
      -========================
      ========================
      ===========
      -=               - MATRONICS WEB FORUMS -
      -= Same great content also available via the Web Forums!
      -
      -=   --> http://forums.matronics.com
      -
      -========================
      ========================
      ===========
      -=             - List Contribution Web Site -
      -=  Thank you for your generous support!
      -=                              -Matt Dralle, List Admin.
      -=   --> http://www.matronics.com/contribution
      -========================
      ========================
      ===========
      
      
Message 4
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Steerable tailwheel- hooked to rudder | 
      
      I to was worried about the horns on the tail rudder section so I removed th
      e the whole thing and I plan on running cables down to the tail wheel horn 
      from the rudder peddles.I didn't like the ideas of all that pressure on the
       wood.Had it have been made out of metal I wouldn't think twice about using
       the horn on it.=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A________________________________=0AFrom: bil
      l55 <bliimatainen@antennaplus.com>=0ATo: pietenpol-list@matronics.com=0ASen
      t: Thu, February 25, 2010 6:47:17 AM=0ASubject: Pietenpol-List: Re: Steerab
      bill55" <bliimatainen@antennaplus.com>=0A=0ADan,=0A=0AWe just finished and 
      test flew the Model A powered Sky Scout based in Brodhead (this past Novemb
      er) and originally had the tail skid.- It did not take long to realize we
       needed a steerable tail wheel!- We used a Ken Perkins design (due to tim
      e constraint) and attached to the lower rudder with light springs (as Denni
      s Hall on his Aircamper).- The process worked great except for the full s
      wivel design of the tail wheel.- I machined that out and the airplane fly
      s and ground handles great.- Feel free to check it out at Brodhead as any
      one knows how to get into my hangar.- I was always apprehensive about the
       horns on the lower rudder but am convinced this is logical solution (and p
      ossibly lighter?) =0A=0ABill Liimatainen=0AMonroe, Wisconsin=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A
      Read this topic online here:=0A=0Ahttp://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php
       - - - - - - - - - - - - -Matt Dralle, List Admin.
      ====
      
Message 5
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Steerable tailwheel- hooked to rudder | 
      
      
      That settles it, I already have some light weight springs I bought from Mc
      masters. Hook to rudder!
      
      Dan Helsper
      Poplar Grove, IL.
      
      
      -----Original Message-----
      From: bill55 <bliimatainen@antennaplus.com>
      Sent: Thu, Feb 25, 2010 5:47 am
      Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: Steerable tailwheel- hooked to rudder
      
      
      om>
      Dan,
      We just finished and test flew the Model A powered Sky Scout based in Brod
      head 
      this past November) and originally had the tail skid.  It did not take lon
      g to 
      ealize we needed a steerable tail wheel!  We used a Ken Perkins design (du
      e to 
      ime constraint) and attached to the lower rudder with light springs (as De
      nnis 
      all on his Aircamper).  The process worked great except for the full swive
      l 
      esign of the tail wheel.  I machined that out and the airplane flys and gr
      ound 
      andles great.  Feel free to check it out at Brodhead as anyone knows how
       to get 
      nto my hangar.  I was always apprehensive about the horns on the lower rud
      der 
      ut am convinced this is logical solution (and possibly lighter?) 
      Bill Liimatainen
      onroe, Wisconsin
      
      
      ead this topic online here:
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=288111#288111
      
      
      ========================
      ===========
      -=          - The Pietenpol-List Email Forum -
      -= Use the Matronics List Features Navigator to browse
      -= the many List utilities such as List Un/Subscription,
      -= Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ,
      -= Photoshare, and much much more:
      -
      -=   --> http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List
      -
      -========================
      ========================
      ===========
      -=               - MATRONICS WEB FORUMS -
      -= Same great content also available via the Web Forums!
      -
      -=   --> http://forums.matronics.com
      -
      -========================
      ========================
      ===========
      -=             - List Contribution Web Site -
      -=  Thank you for your generous support!
      -=                              -Matt Dralle, List Admin.
      -=   --> http://www.matronics.com/contribution
      -========================
      ========================
      ===========
      
      
Message 6
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Sky Scout... | 
      
      Ray, put 1/2" wide 1/8" plywood doublers on either side of your 3/4"  
      spar at each rib station and the problem is solved.  This is what I'm  
      
      doing on mine, since I inherited 3/4" spars when I bought the  
      project.  Keeping the rib openings at 1" allows you to slide them  
      over all the doubler plates for the lift strut attachment fittings,  
      wing tip a bow attach fittings, etc.   If you make the openings 3/4",  
      
      then you have to slide all the ribs on & then glue all the doublers  
      in place, which seems like a trickier prospect than being able to  
      glue them on with the spar laying flat on a bench.
      
      Kip Gardner
      
      On Feb 24, 2010, at 11:19 PM, Ray Krause wrote:
      
      > Thanks, Gary.
      >
      > The wing is exactly the same, except 27" shorter.  Routing would be  
      
      > a lot of work, but doable.  The ribs I got with the other wood are  
      > all built and seem to be made for the 1" spar.  I will have to make  
      
      > a decision on which way to go.
      >
      > I have been putting in hard points in the fuselage for the seat and  
      
      > shoulder safety belts; thankfully I only need one set!  I put the  
      > hard pints one station behind the seat, so I will have to find the  
      > right seat belts to fit.  ACS has some that might work, when I get  
      > that far.  Got the turtle deck mostly done today, that was fun.
      >
      > Thanks for the help.
      >
      > Ray Krause
      >
      > P.S. Guess I will have to take the Waiex to the Peit fly in.
      >
      >
      > ----- Original Message -----
      > From: Gary Boothe
      > To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com
      > Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 7:59 PM
      > Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Sky Scout...
      >
      > No problem, Ray. I took your meaning to be, would the same  
      > information apply to a Sky Scout. Having never seen Sky Scout  
      > plans, I could not say, with real authority, that a =BE=94 spar is OK  
      
      > for the Sky Scout; however, it is my understanding that the two  
      > airplanes are very similar, maybe even the same wing. Lots of  
      > conversations on this list point out that vintage aircraft such as  
      > the T-craft or Piper Cub, have used an assortment of spar  
      > materials, =BE=94 thick. It is my recollection that the same  
      > conversation led to the agreement that, after routing, you  
      > basically end up with a =BE=94 spar, anyhow.
      >
      > Please, someone (I know this is a bashful group), if I have mis- 
      > directed Ray, please jump in!
      >
      > Gary Boothe
      > Cool, CA
      > Pietenpol
      > WW Corvair Conversion
      > Tail done, Fuselage on gear
      > 18 ribs done
      >
      > From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner- 
      > pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Ray Krause
      > Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 12:29 PM
      > To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com
      > Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Sky Scout...
      >
      > Gary,
      >
      > Thanks.  I became confused answering all the e-mails that I started  
      
      > with these questions.  I know that you are building an Air Camper!   
      
      > Thanks for the info on the spars.
      >
      > Ray Krause
      > ----- Original Message -----
      > From: gboothe5@comcast.net
      > To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com
      > Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 12:15 PM
      > Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Sky Scout...
      >
      > Negative.
      > Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
      >
      > From: "Ray Krause" <raykrause@frontiernet.net>
      > Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 11:24:54 -0800
      > To: <pietenpol-list@matronics.com>
      > Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Sky Scout...
      >
      > Gary,
      >
      > Thanks for the information.  If = using the 3/4"  spar material, 
      
      > would I still rout out the spar as shown in the = plans?  Are   
      
      > you building a Sky Scout?
      >
      > Ray Krause
      > ----- Original Message -----
      > From:  gboothe5@comcast.net
      > To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com=  
      > Sent: Tuesday, February 23, = 2010 9:15  AM
      > Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: = Sky  Scout...
      >
      > Ray,
      >
      > FYI...3/4" is an acceptable dimension for = spars. 
      >
      > Gary
      > Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
      >
      > From: "Ray Krause" <raykrause@frontiernet.net&g= t; 
      > Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 07:59:45 -0800
      > To: <pietenpol-list@matronics.com= >
      > Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Sky Scout...
      >
      > Thanks, Gary.
      >
      > I will accept your humility with a = =3D grain  of=3D20 
      salt!   
      > Your beautiful workmanship attests to your =3D  abilities!
      >
      > The point about laminating to avoid = =3D wood  defects 
      is=3D20  
      > well taken,  I will follow suit.  After = computing the  costs 
      of  
      > =3D the=3D20 metal struts, I am leaning towards the wood = 
      struts!   
      > As  far as the =3D spars=3D20 go, they were included in the 
      wood  
      > I got = with the Sky  Scout package; =3D they are=3D20 
      spruce.   
      > But rather than the 1" = thickness,  they are 3/4", I think I 
      =3D  
      > will=3D20 sandwich then with two pieces = of 1/8" birch  
      plywood  
      > to get the 1" (so =3D they fit=3D20 the ribs).  = The Hughes  
      > Hardwood =3D place in=3D20 Chico = had beautiful  parallel 
      grain  
      > fir that would have made beautiful =3D spars,=3D20 = cheap,  
      
      > too.  Next time I am in Chico, I will check out the =3D = hickory. 
      
      > =3D20  The ash seems to be really dense/heavy (stronger than  
      > hickory?).  = I =3D  will=3D20 try to look it up.
      >
      > Thanks for the response. And yes, I = =3D have  
      referenced=3D20  
      > Chris's web site and printed many photos.... but it = makes my   
      
      > eyes and =3D brain=3D20 hurt!
      >
      > Ray
      > ----- Original Message -----
      > From:=3D20 Gary=3D20  Boothe 
      > To: pietenpol-list@matronics= .com=3D  =3D20
      > Sent: Monday, February 22, 2010 =3D = 3:17=3D20 PM
      > Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: =3D Sky=3D20 = Scout...
      >
      > Ray,
      >
      > Your=3D20 questions are intelligent and = educated=3D85.attributes
      
      > to  which I make =3D no personal=3D20 claim. In all honesty, I 
      
      > perused = the West  Coast Piet web site to =3D 
      exhaustion.=3D20  
      > Too bad Chris Tracy = doesn=3D92t have  sponsors, or he=3D92d 
      be  
      > a rich man! =3D After=3D20 looking at every = application  
      of  
      > wood strut that has been built and is =3D flying,=3D20 I decided =
      
      > it was  doable. Conversations about appropriate woods went =3D  
      
      > from ash=3D20 = to spruce,  including hickory. I decided that 
      I  
      > liked the look of =3D hickory = and=3D20 the  decision was 
      that  
      > easy. For size, I just used the plans dimensions = =3D for=3D20=
      20  
      > steel.
      >
      > Later=3D20 conversations with another builder (either = Cliff  
      
      > Dawson or Douwe =3D Blumberg),=3D20 far  more intelligent and =  
      
      > educated than  I, showed published =3D strengths of=3D20 
      various  
      > woods, and = verified that  hickory had plenty of strength for  
      
      > =3D our=3D20 purposes. I think I = can find  that email, but 
      
      > it=3D92s on my other =3D computer at=3D20 home. 
      >
      > My=3D20 wing struts will also be hickory, roughly the = shape  
      > and  size on the =3D plans.=3D20 Connections will surely be  
      
      > similar to = Douwe=3D92s. All  cabanes and wing =3D struts  
      
      > are=3D20 laminated = because=3D85.that=3D92s what everyone  
      does!  
      > Really, it gives you =3D an=3D20 opportunity to rotate the = 
      grain  
      > and  eliminate the possibility of =3D having a weak=3D20 link. 
      
      > Also, it = looks really  cool!
      >
      > My=3D20 wood source is a local hardwood supplier, in = Auburn,  
      > Ca  (California=3D20 Hardwoods), who does his own wholesale  
      > purchasing = in whatever  length =3D and size=3D20 needed. 
      He  
      > even mills, if necessary. He = located my fir  spars and sold 
      =3D  
      > all four=3D20 for $185!! Bonus is that he helped = build some  
      
      > wood airplanes and knows =3D what=3D20 grains to look = for.
      >
      > Further=3D20 note:  If anything goes wrong, = I=3D92ll blame  
      
      > Chris Tracy for =3D publishing all=3D20 those = photos!
      >
      > Gary=3D20 Boothe
      >
      > Cool,=3D20 CA
      >
      > Pietenpol
      >
      > WW=3D20 Corvair Conversion
      >
      > Tail=3D20 done, Fuselage on gear
      >
      > 18=3D20 ribs done
      >
      > From:=3D20  owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com=3D20  
      
      > [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of =  
      
      > =3D Ray=3D20 Krause
      > Sent: Monday, February 22, 2010 1:51  PM
      > To: =3D pietenpol-list@matronics.com
      > Subject: = Re:  Pietenpol-List: =3D Sky=3D20 = Scout...
      >
      > Gary,
      >
      > If I  made =3D these 22"=3D20 struts (front/center) from 
      metal,  
      > they would = weigh 22+  ounces without =3D the=3D20 ends. 
      How did  
      > you decide on the = thickness and shape  for the struts? =3D 
      Why  
      > did=3D20 you chose Hickory versus, say = ash?  Did  you 
      laminate  
      > because you =3D needed=3D20 to get to a certain = thickness, or  
      
      > for  strength?  There is a =3D source for=3D20 hickory and ash 
      
      > that = has 2" (8/4)  material in Chico, I think.  I =3D got  
      
      > some=3D20 1" ash for = 2.37 per board  foot.
      >
      > Are  your =3D "flying=3D20 struts" (the long struts) also  
      > hickory?  = What=3D20  shape?
      >
      > Thanks,
      >
      > Ray=3D20 Krause.
      >
      > P.S.  The =3D aerostream=3D20 tubing is very expensive, about  
      
      > $56.00 per = front strut  ($28.00/ft and =3D .7593=3D20 
      lbs/ft).  
      > Wicks has it for $17.00/ft = right now. I  am not sure of its 
      =3D  
      > quality.=3D20 None of the aerotubing matches = the  
      recommended  
      > sizes on the plans (1.5 =3D X .75=3D20 and 2" X  1").
      >
      > -----  =3D Original=3D20 Message -----
      >
      > From: Gary=3D20 Boothe 
      >
      > To: pietenpol-list@matron= ics.com=3D  =3D20
      >
      > Sent: =3D  Monday, February=3D20 22, 2010 7:31 AM
      >
      > Subject:  RE:=3D20 Pietenpol-List: Sky Scout...
      >
      > Ray,
      >
      > I had a couple free minutes before I took = =3D off for  
      the=3D20  
      > week. It took 10 seconds to pull off one of the rear = cabanes. It  
      
      > =3D  measures=3D20 21" end-to-end, and weighs 18 oz (had to 
      use  
      > the = postal=3D20  scales!).
      >
      > Gary Boothe
      >
      > Cool, Ca.
      >
      > Pietenpol
      >
      > WW Corvair Conversion, =3D = mounted
      >
      > Tail done, Fuselage on gear
      >
      > (18 ribs down=3D85)
      >
      > -----Original Message-----
      > From: = owner-pi= etenpol=3D  
      -list-server@matronics.com=3D20   
      > [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of =  
      
      > Ray=3D20  Krause
      > Sent: Sunday, February 21, 2010 8:54 PM
      > To:=3D20  pietenpol-list@matronics.com
      > Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: = Sky=3D20  Scout...
      >
      
      > <raykrause@frontiernet.net>
      >
      > Shad,
      >
      > Thanks for the comments on the = struts.  =3D I  will=3D20  
      
      > probably go with the 4130
      >
      > struts from Wicks.  It is just that I = =3D  really=3D20 
      enjoy  
      > the wood working.  If the
      >
      > wood were comparable, I would maybe go = that=3D20  way.
      >
      > I would appreciate the Dillsburg Aero =3D  Reference. =3D20 
      The  
      > size of the metal
      >
      > struts is included in the plans; so I can = =3D probably   
      > get=3D20 pretty close to the
      >
      > right size.
      >
      > Thanks for your help.
      >
      > Ray Krause
      >
      > ----- Original Message ----- 
      >
      > From: "shad bell"=3D20  <aviatorbell@yahoo.com>
      >
      > To:=3D20  <pietenpol-list@matronics.com>
      >
      > Sent: Saturday, February 20, 2010 = 5:33=3D20  PM
      >
      > Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Sky=3D20  Scout...
      >
      > > --> Pietenpol-List message posted = =3D by:  shad=3D20 
      bell  
      > <aviatorbell@yahoo.com>
      >
      > >
      >
      > >
      >
      > > Ray, I am not 100% sure but I would = bet =3D  wooden=3D20 
      
      > struts are heavier than
      >
      > > streamlined tube.  The bolts, = and =3D steel  end=3D20  
      
      > fittings that would be
      >
      > > required add up fast.  As for = the =3D  older=3D20 metal  
      
      > designation, just usse 4130,
      >
      > > If you need I can see what dimensions = =3D ours  are,=3D20 
      
      > some where in the 2 inch
      >
      > > by 9/16 (minor axis) .049 wall =3D  thickness. =3D20 also 
      check  
      > dillsburg aero works 
      >
      > > for tube prices, wicks is also having = a =3D  special=3D20 
      
      > "sale" on streamlined
      >
      > > tubing of some dimensions.  I = can =3D look  up=3D20 the  
      
      > number for Dillsburg Aero
      >
      > > Works in PA if you need me to, I have = a =3D  price=3D20 
      list  
      > out in my hanger, he
      >
      > > does not have a web =3D = site.
      >
      > >
      >
      > >
      >
      > > Shad
      >
      > >
      >
      > >
      >
      > >
      >
      > >
      >
      > >
      >
      > >
      >
      > >
      >
      > >
      >
      >
      > <=3D
      > /PRE>
      > http://
      > www.mat=3D
      > ronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List
      > &
      > lt;=3D
      > B><=3D
      > /PRE>
      > http://forums.matronics.com=3D
      > <=3D
      > /PRE>
      > =3D
      > http://www.matronic
      > s.com/c=3D
      > ontribution
      > <=3D
      > /PRE>
      >
      >
      > href=3D3D"http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List">http:// 
      
      > ww
      > w.mat=3D
      > ronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List
      > href=3D3D"http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com
      >
      > href=3D3D"http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http:// 
      > www.matronics.
      > com/c=3D
      >
      >
      > 3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D
      =3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D 
      > 3D=3D
      > 3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D
      =3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D 
      > 3D=3D
      > 3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D
      =3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D 
      > 3D=3D
      > 3D
      > href=3D'3D"http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol- 
      > List"'>http://www
      > .matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List
      > 3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D
      =3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D 
      > 3D=3D
      > 3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D
      =3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D 
      > 3D=3D
      > 3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D
      =3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D 
      > 3D=3D
      > 3D
      > href=3D'3D"http://forums.matronics.com"'>http://forums.matronics.com
      > 3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D
      =3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D 
      > 3D=3D
      > 3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D
      =3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D 
      > 3D=3D
      > 3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D
      =3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D 
      > 3D=3D
      > 3D
      > href=3D'3D"http://www.matronics.com/contribution"'>http:// 
      > www.matronics.c
      > om/contribution
      > 3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D
      =3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D 
      > 3D=3D
      > 3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D
      =3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D 
      > 3D=3D
      > 3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D
      =3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D 
      > 3D=3D
      > 3D
      >
      >
      > ~=B2=03r
      >
      >
      > 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
      =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 
      > D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
      3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
      > href='3D"http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List"'>http:// 
      
      > www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List
      > 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
      =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 
      > D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
      3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
      > href='3D"http://forums.matronics.com"'>http://forums.matronics.com
      > 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
      =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 
      > D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
      3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
      > href='3D"http://www.matronics.com/contribution"'>http:// 
      > www.matronics.com/contribution
      > 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
      =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 
      > D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
      3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
      >
      > ~=B2
      > r
      >
      >
      > http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List
      > http://forums.matronics.com
      > http://www.matronics.com/contribution
      >
      >
      > href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List">http:// 
      > www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List
      > href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com
      > href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http:// 
      > www.matronics.com/c
      >
      >
      
      
Message 7
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      
      
      Guys, if you don't already have the original
      Flying & Glider Manuals, you should get a copy
      by all means.  Besides the Air Camper and Sky
      Scout plans and details, there are a whole
      bunch of other interesting aircraft in them,
      well worth your time to peruse.
      
      And for whoever mentioned that they didn't
      think there was much difference in drag between
      round and streamline tubing, there really is.
      I can dig up the old aircraft design manual
      that has a graph of relative drag between
      round, simple teardrop, streamline, and one
      or two other shapes.  It's significant.  
      
      Oscar Zuniga
      Air Camper NX41CC
      San Antonio, TX
      mailto: taildrags@hotmail.com
      website at http://www.flysquirrel.net 		 	   		  
      
      
Message 8
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Steerable tailwheel- hooked to rudder | 
      
      
      Once upon a time I'd heard from others wiser than I that the two springs should
      be different. This is so they apply unequal forces on the tailwheel and put a
      light loading on the linkages. Otherwise, a force-neutral setup could allow an
      unwanted oscillation which could ruin your day. Picture the flutter that would
      happen if your elevator weren't loaded to one side; same concept.
      
      Jim Ash
      
      
      -----Original Message----- 
      From: helspersew@aol.com 
      Sent: Feb 25, 2010 7:35 AM 
      Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Re: Steerable tailwheel- hooked to rudder 
      
      
      That settles it, I already have some light weight springs I bought from Mcmasters.
      Hook to rudder!
      
      Dan Helsper
      Poplar Grove, IL.
      
      
      -----Original Message-----
      From: bill55 <bliimatainen@antennaplus.com>
      Sent: Thu, Feb 25, 2010 5:47 am
      Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: Steerable tailwheel- hooked to rudder
      
      
      
      Dan,
      
      We just finished and test flew the Model A powered Sky Scout based in Brodhead
      
      (this past November) and originally had the tail skid.  It did not take long to
      
      realize we needed a steerable tail wheel!  We used a Ken Perkins design (due to
      
      time constraint) and attached to the lower rudder with light springs (as Dennis
      
      Hall on his Aircamper).  The process worked great except for the full swivel 
      design of the tail wheel.  I machined that out and the airplane flys and ground
      
      handles great.  Feel free to check it out at Brodhead as anyone knows how to get
      
      into my hangar.  I was always apprehensive about the horns on the lower rudder
      
      but am convinced this is logical solution (and possibly lighter?) 
      
      Bill Liimatainen
      Monroe, Wisconsin
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=288111#288111
      
      
      ===================================
      t" target=_blank>http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List
      ===================================
      tp://forums.matronics.com
      ===================================
      _blank>http://www.matronics.com/contribution
      ===================================
      
      
Message 9
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      
      So Dick,
      
      What engine are you using?  is this an aircamper or a scout?  I'm always
      interested in different engines.
      
      Douwe
      
      
Message 10
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Steerable tailwheel- hooked to rudder | 
      
      Dan,
      I made a double horn for rudder and tailwheel steering so the torsional load from
      the tailwheel would not have to travel through wood. Also since the rudder
      horn is moved to the bottom of the rudder I added some extra support to spread
      the load up the rudder. The horns are constructed like  Pietenpols, two pieces
      of .032 edge welded. The attached picture is the current status of the project,
      so the design has not been flight tested.
      Skip
      
      
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: 
      Sent: 2/24/2010 7:48:58 PM 
      Subject: Pietenpol-List: Steerable tailwheel- hooked to rudder
      
      
      Hi Guys,
      
      I have been wrestling with the engineering of making my free-castoring tailwheel
      into a steerable type. The conventional wisdom on this list has been that one
      should not connect the tailwheel with the rudder, as per the Aeronca Champ,
      and many others of that era, due to the fact (?) that the wooden rudder is not
      strong enough to handle the loads. I see that Ken Perkin's Time Machine is set-up
      just that way. 
      
      Any new thoughts on this subject?
      
      Dan Helsper
      Poplar Grove, IL.
      
Message 11
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Doesn't the GN-1 Grega have  a beefed up rudder to steer | 
      the  tailwheel ?
      
      In looking at photos of uncovered GN-1 rudders I have seen they beef them u
      p to handle the
      tailwheel steering horn down low.     Correct me if I'm wrong but I believe
       the GN-1 Grega Air Camper
      uses the rudder to steer the tailwheel.
      
      The GN-1 tied out at my home airport for 30+ years had this rudder/tailwhee
      l steering setup.    It is now in
      Elizabeth City, NC being restored and a set of wire wheels and streamlined 
      steel tube landing gear legs put
      on that are painted up to resemble streamlined wood gear legs.
      
      Mike C.
      
      
Message 12
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Steerable tailwheel- hooked to rudder | 
      
      Not necessary. The tailwheel assembly has some friction; that dampens 
      the system and reduces the liklihood of oscillation.
      
      Check out the local production taildraggers.
      
      David Paule
      
      
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: "Jim Ash" <ashcan@earthlink.net>
      Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 7:40 AM
      Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Re: Steerable tailwheel- hooked to rudder
      
      
      > 
      > Once upon a time I'd heard from others wiser than I that the two 
      springs should be different. This is so they apply unequal forces on the 
      tailwheel and put a light loading on the linkages. Otherwise, a 
      force-neutral setup could allow an unwanted oscillation which could ruin 
      your day. Picture the flutter that would happen if your elevator weren't 
      loaded to one side; same concept.
      > 
      > Jim Ash
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > -----Original Message----- 
      > From: helspersew@aol.com 
      > Sent: Feb 25, 2010 7:35 AM 
      > To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com 
      > Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Re: Steerable tailwheel- hooked to rudder 
      
      > 
      > 
      > That settles it, I already have some light weight springs I bought 
      from Mcmasters. Hook to rudder!
      > 
      > Dan Helsper
      > Poplar Grove, IL.
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > -----Original Message-----
      > From: bill55 <bliimatainen@antennaplus.com>
      > To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com
      > Sent: Thu, Feb 25, 2010 5:47 am
      > Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: Steerable tailwheel- hooked to rudder
      > 
      > 
      <bliimatainen@antennaplus.com>
      > 
      > Dan,
      > 
      > We just finished and test flew the Model A powered Sky Scout based in 
      Brodhead 
      > (this past November) and originally had the tail skid.  It did not 
      take long to 
      > realize we needed a steerable tail wheel!  We used a Ken Perkins 
      design (due to 
      > time constraint) and attached to the lower rudder with light springs 
      (as Dennis 
      > Hall on his Aircamper).  The process worked great except for the full 
      swivel 
      > design of the tail wheel.  I machined that out and the airplane flys 
      and ground 
      > handles great.  Feel free to check it out at Brodhead as anyone knows 
      how to get 
      > into my hangar.  I was always apprehensive about the horns on the 
      lower rudder 
      > but am convinced this is logical solution (and possibly lighter?) 
      > 
      > Bill Liimatainen
      > Monroe, Wisconsin
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > Read this topic online here:
      > 
      > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=288111#288111
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > t" target=_blank>http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List
      > 
      > tp://forums.matronics.com
      > 
      > _blank>http://www.matronics.com/contribution
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      >
      
Message 13
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Steerable tailwheel- hooked to rudder | 
      
      
      Regardless of whether the forces travel through wood or steel and 
      over what distance, my concern with this type of set-up is whether 
      the bottom hinge installation is sufficient to the task. The original 
      design is sufficient for flying loads. Now we're asking that hinge 
      and its attachments to take a bashing from everything the tailwheel 
      runs over and up against. Is the original design up to the task?
      
      I've seen some rudder hinge installations that clearly can take it 
      (Skip's sure looks stout enough). I would not trust the one on our 
      Piet.
      -- 
      
      Jeff Boatright
      "Now let's think about this..."
      
      
Message 14
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Dick's two cylinder Harley engine | 
      
      Here's a company who specializes in using Harley engines in airplanes.
      
      Cool idea Dick !     It sounds pretty cool in this video too.
      
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LSTRlAx_YSc
      
      
Message 15
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Doesn't the GN-1 Grega have  a beefed up rudder to | 
      steer the  tailwheel ?
      
      You are correct Mike. Grega uses Pietenpols tail feather design, actually looks
      like copies of Hoopman's 1934 drawings. Grega filled in the bottom rudder gusset
      with spruce and also filled in between the lowest rudder rib capstrips from
      the LE to main beam with spruce and than bolts the rudder horn to this spruce
      fill-in.
      Skip
      
      
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXD0)[ASRC Aerospace Corporation] 
      Sent: 2/25/2010 10:24:27 AM 
      Subject: Pietenpol-List: Doesn't the GN-1 Grega have a beefed up rudder to steer
      the tailwheel ?
      
      
      In looking at photos of uncovered GN-1 rudders I have seen they beef them up to
      handle the
      tailwheel steering horn down low.     Correct me if Im wrong but I believe the
      GN-1 Grega Air Camper
      uses the rudder to steer the tailwheel. 
      
      The GN-1 tied out at my home airport for 30+ years had this rudder/tailwheel steering
      setup.    It is now in
      Elizabeth City, NC being restored and a set of wire wheels and streamlined steel
      tube landing gear legs put
      on that are painted up to resemble streamlined wood gear legs.   
      
      Mike C.
      
      
Message 16
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Newest Piet video | 
      
      
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k3Tzms7Qxe8
      -- 
      
      Jeff Boatright
      "Now let's think about this..."
      
      
Message 17
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      Ray,
      -
      Round-tube are structurally better than streamlined struts,-subjected t
      o-compression, but they are less efficient aerodynamically, as Oscar said
      .- I chose round struts because that's what I can afford :-) 
      Attached is a photo of a beautiful Piet with round lift struts and streamli
      ned-cabanes.
      Saludos
      -
      Santiago=0A=0A=0A      Yahoo! Cocina=0A=0AEncontra las mejores recetas con 
      Yahoo! Cocina.=0A=0A=0Ahttp://ar.mujer.yahoo.com/cocina/
      
Message 18
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Steerable tailwheel- hooked to rudder | 
      
      
      Excellent design Skip. I know we are not supposed to change anything
      from the Piet plans but since the plans do not include a tailwheel
      (and a left and right cable running to a tailwheel control horn), I
      think we can give Skip official dispensation here. I think this design
      simplifies and improves the design of any Piet incorporating a
      tailwheel and is based on a flight proven design (the GN-1). I will do
      it this way on my next Piet project.
      
      Rick
      
      On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Skip Gadd <skipgadd@earthlink.net> wrote:
      > Dan,
      > I made a double horn for rudder and tailwheel steering so the torsional load
      > from the tailwheel would not have to travel through wood. Also since the
      > rudder horn is moved to the bottom of the rudder I added some extra support
      > to spread the load up the rudder. The horns are constructedlike
      > Pietenpols, two pieces of .032 edge welded. The attached picture is the
      > current status of the project, so the design has not been flight tested.
      > Skip
      >
      >
      > ----- Original Message -----
      > From:
      > To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com
      > Sent: 2/24/2010 7:48:58 PM
      > Subject: Pietenpol-List: Steerable tailwheel- hooked to rudder
      > Hi Guys,
      >
      > I have been wrestling with the engineering of making my free-castoring
      > tailwheel into a steerable type. The conventional wisdom on this list has
      > been that one should not connect the tailwheel with the rudder, as per the
      > Aeronca Champ, and many others of that era, due to the fact (?) that the
      > wooden rudder is not strong enough to handle the loads. I see that Ken
      > Perkin's Time Machine is set-up just that way.
      >
      > Any new thoughts on this subject?
      >
      > Dan Helsper
      > Poplar Grove, IL.
      >
      >
      
      
      -- 
      Rick Holland
      Castle Rock, Colorado
      
      "Logic is a wreath of pretty flowers, that smell bad"
      
      
Message 19
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Piet Pitts Death Ray | 
      
      
      Very few videos have a Pietenpol, a Pitts Special, and a Tesla Death 
      Ray in them. Oh, and beer! Don't forget the beer!
      
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k3Tzms7Qxe8
      
      Enjoy!
      -- 
      
      Jeff Boatright
      "Now let's think about this..."
      
      
Message 20
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Steerable tailwheel- hooked to rudder | 
      
      Looks clean, Skip! Looking beyond your tail.you're not related to the
      'Clampetts', are you?
      
      
      Gary Boothe
      
      Cool, CA
      
      Pietenpol
      
      WW Corvair Conversion
      
      Tail done, Fuselage on gear
      
      18 ribs done
      
      
      From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Skip Gadd
      Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 7:13 AM
      Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Steerable tailwheel- hooked to rudder
      
      
      Dan,
      
      I made a double horn for rudder and tailwheel steering so the torsional load
      from the tailwheel would not have to travel through wood. Also since the
      rudder horn is moved to the bottom of the rudder I added some extra support
      to spread the load up the rudder. The horns are constructed like
      Pietenpols, two pieces of .032 edge welded. The attached picture is the
      current status of the project, so the design has not been flight tested.
      
      Skip
      
      
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      
      From: 
      
      
      Sent: 2/24/2010 7:48:58 PM 
      
      Subject: Pietenpol-List: Steerable tailwheel- hooked to rudder
      
      
      Hi Guys,
      
      
      I have been wrestling with the engineering of making my free-castoring
      tailwheel into a steerable type. The conventional wisdom on this list has
      been that one should not connect the tailwheel with the rudder, as per the
      Aeronca Champ, and many others of that era, due to the fact (?) that the
      wooden rudder is not strong enough to handle the loads. I see that Ken
      Perkin's Time Machine is set-up just that way. 
      
      
      Any new thoughts on this subject?
      
      
      Dan Helsper
      
      Poplar Grove, IL.
      
      
      <> 
      
      
Message 21
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Piet Pitts Death Ray | 
      
      
      Sorry for the double (triple?) post. Email is being weird this 
      morning...That and I'm a luddite.
      -- 
      
      Jeff Boatright
      "Now let's think about this..."
      
      
Message 22
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Outstanding video Jeff !  Piet Pitts Death Ray | 
      
      
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k3Tzms7Qxe8
      
      This is a must-see Jeff Boatright Production.    Loved the music, the  fast forwarding
      during mundane scenes, the captions, the pirate music and change of paces---most
      excellent Jeff !    
      
      Love the boo's, the cheers, the heckling from the crowd during your stall serious.
      Now here is a guy with a John Hofmann sense of humor, AKA John's outstanding
      video:   Tribute to Jim Markle which still brings tears to my eyes every time
      I watch it.
      
      Mike C. 
      
      
Message 23
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Red Betsy - on to Boscobel | 
      
      
      Dan; if you like Bligh and Cook, no doubt you've read the Mutiny on the Bounty
      trilogy, and perhaps the Aubrey-Maturin series as well?  Great stuff... but no
      flying or airplanes ;o(
      
      do not archive
      
      --------
      Oscar Zuniga
      San Antonio, TX
      Air Camper NX41CC
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=288162#288162
      
      
Message 24
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Sky Scout... | 
      
      Round less efficient true, but at Piet speeds probably equates to a fraction
      of an mph.
      
      On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 11:10 AM, santiago morete <
      moretesantiago@yahoo.com.ar> wrote:
      
      > Ray,
      >
      > Round tube are structurally better than streamlined struts, subjected
      > to compression, but they are less efficient aerodynamically, as Oscar said.
      > I chose round struts because that's what I can afford :-)
      > Attached is a photo of a beautiful Piet with round lift struts and
      > streamlined cabanes.
      > Saludos
      >
      > Santiago
      >
      > ------------------------------
      >
      > Encontra las mejores recetas con Yahoo! Cocina.
      > http://ar.mujer.yahoo.com/cocina/
      >
      
      
      -- 
      Rick Holland
      Castle Rock, Colorado
      
      "Logic is a wreath of pretty flowers, that smell bad"
      
Message 25
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Sky Scout... | 
      
      
      A couple of friends had a Pup on which that they put streamlined 
      covers on the round struts. Made a big difference in climb rate, of 
      all things, and some difference in top speed (which is hardly the 
      point for a Pup). They were both real surprised with the climb, 
      though.
      -- 
      
      Jeff Boatright
      "Now let's think about this..."
      
      
Message 26
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Dick's two cylinder Harley engine | 
      
      Hi Mike
      Thats the model I was looking at.  I talked with them at SNF and OSH a 
      couple of years ago and have been watching them since.  I got a bit of 
      bad news about them last year, but they seem to have things worked out a 
      bit on that front.  Do you remember the harley engine down on the other 
      end of the field at Brodhead?  That was another good installation..
      Dick N. 
        ----- Original Message ----- 
        From: Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXD0)[ASRC Aerospace Corporation] 
        To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com 
        Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 10:07 AM
        Subject: Pietenpol-List: Dick's two cylinder Harley engine
      
      
        Here's a company who specializes in using Harley engines in airplanes. 
      
      
         
      
        Cool idea Dick !     It sounds pretty cool in this video too. 
      
         
      
        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LSTRlAx_YSc
      
         
      
         
      
         
      
         
      
      
Message 27
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Outstanding video Jeff !  Piet Pitts Death Ray | 
      
      
      Glad you liked it. I had fun with the flying and making the video. 
      And that Piet is out or rig! Really! The ball was centered!
      
      Drat you Red Baron!!
      -- 
      
      Jeff Boatright
      "Now let's think about this..."
      
      
Message 28
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Dick's new Piet | 
      
      
      Hi Douwe
      Check out Mike Cuys post with the Harley.  I'm checking on where to have all 
      of the chroming done for the struts and all at this point.
      Dick
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: "Douwe Blumberg" <douweblumberg@earthlink.net>
      Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 8:54 AM
      Subject: Pietenpol-List: Dick's new Piet
      
      
      > <douweblumberg@earthlink.net>
      >
      > So Dick,
      >
      > What engine are you using?  is this an aircamper or a scout?  I'm always
      > interested in different engines.
      >
      > Douwe
      >
      >
      > 
      
      
Message 29
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Steerable tailwheel- hooked to rudder | 
      
      
      My J-3 had the basic hard-rubber wheel, which has since been replaced with a Scott
      full-swivel. That was the answer I got when I questioned why the springs on
      the new one weren't the same. 
      
      Jim
      
      
      -----Original Message----- 
      From: David Paule 
      Sent: Feb 25, 2010 10:38 AM 
      Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Re: Steerable tailwheel- hooked to rudder 
      
      
      Not necessary. The tailwheel assembly has some friction; that dampens the system
      and reduces the liklihood of oscillation.
      
      Check out the local production taildraggers.
      
      David Paule
      
      
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: "Jim Ash" <ashcan@earthlink.net>
      Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 7:40 AM
      Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Re: Steerable tailwheel- hooked to rudder
      
      > 
      > Once upon a time I'd heard from others wiser than I that the two springs should
      be different. This is so they apply unequal forces on the tailwheel and put
      a light loading on the linkages. Otherwise, a force-neutral setup could allow
      an unwanted oscillation which could ruin your day. Picture the flutter that would
      happen if your elevator weren't loaded to one side; same concept.
      > 
      > Jim Ash
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > -----Original Message----- 
      > From: helspersew@aol.com 
      > Sent: Feb 25, 2010 7:35 AM 
      > To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com 
      > Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Re: Steerable tailwheel- hooked to rudder 
      > 
      > 
      > That settles it, I already have some light weight springs I bought from Mcmasters.
      Hook to rudder!
      > 
      > Dan Helsper
      > Poplar Grove, IL.
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > -----Original Message-----
      > From: bill55 <bliimatainen@antennaplus.com>
      > To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com
      > Sent: Thu, Feb 25, 2010 5:47 am
      > Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: Steerable tailwheel- hooked to rudder
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > Dan,
      > 
      > We just finished and test flew the Model A powered Sky Scout based in Brodhead
      
      > (this past November) and originally had the tail skid.  It did not take long
      to 
      > realize we needed a steerable tail wheel!  We used a Ken Perkins design (due
      to 
      > time constraint) and attached to the lower rudder with light springs (as Dennis
      
      > Hall on his Aircamper).  The process worked great except for the full swivel
      
      > design of the tail wheel.  I machined that out and the airplane flys and ground
      
      > handles great.  Feel free to check it out at Brodhead as anyone knows how to
      get 
      > into my hangar.  I was always apprehensive about the horns on the lower rudder
      
      > but am convinced this is logical solution (and possibly lighter?) 
      > 
      > Bill Liimatainen
      > Monroe, Wisconsin
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > Read this topic online here:
      > 
      > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=288111#288111
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > ==========
      > t" target=_blank>http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List
      > ==========
      > tp://forums.matronics.com
      > ==========
      > _blank>http://www.matronics.com/contribution
      > ==========
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > ==========
      > Pietenpol-List Un/Subscription,
      > --> http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List
      <FONT ="=========
      > bsp;   via the href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com
      <FONT ="=========
      > bsp; - generous support!
      > bsp;                  href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/contribution
      > ==========
      > 
      > 
      > 
      
      
Message 30
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Dick's two cylinder Harley engine | 
      
      I swear I saw a Bleriot replica on the web that used a Harley V-twin too bu
      t can't seem to locate the link now.
      
      Mike C.
      
      do not archive
      
      
Message 31
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Dick's new Piet | 
      
      
      Chroming for your struts?  Many years ago I had a Harley with a lot of custom plating
      (chrome and gold) that was done at a place in Padukah KY, Brown's Plating
      I think.  They've been around forever.
      
      Might be worth checking on for a source of your plating...I think I actually saw
      the place mentioned somewhere not long ago so their probably still around....
      
      
      -----Original Message-----
      >From: Dick N <horzpool@goldengate.net>
      >Sent: Feb 25, 2010 11:28 AM
      >To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com
      >Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Dick's new Piet
      >
      >
      >Hi Douwe
      >Check out Mike Cuys post with the Harley.  I'm checking on where to have all 
      >of the chroming done for the struts and all at this point.
      >Dick
      >----- Original Message ----- 
      >From: "Douwe Blumberg" <douweblumberg@earthlink.net>
      >To: "pietenpolgroup" <pietenpol-list@matronics.com>
      >Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 8:54 AM
      >Subject: Pietenpol-List: Dick's new Piet
      >
      >
      >> <douweblumberg@earthlink.net>
      >>
      >> So Dick,
      >>
      >> What engine are you using?  is this an aircamper or a scout?  I'm always
      >> interested in different engines.
      >>
      >> Douwe
      >>
      >>
      >>
      >>
      >> 
      >
      >
      
      
Message 32
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Dick's two cylinder Harley engine | 
      
      
      Still have a "HogAir" tshirt I got a SNF a few years ago, had a Harley
      demo engine there at the time. Don't know if they are around anymore.
      
      On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 12:25 PM, Dick N <horzpool@goldengate.net> wrote:
      > Hi Mike
      > Thats the model I was looking at. I talked with them at SNF and OSH a
      > couple of years ago and have been watching them since. I got a bit of bad
      > news about them last year, but they seem to have things worked out a bit on
      > that front. Do you remember the harley engine down on the other end of the
      > field at Brodhead? That was another good installation..
      > Dick N.
      >
      > ----- Original Message -----
      > From: Cuy, Michael D. (GRC-RXD0)[ASRC Aerospace Corporation]
      > To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com
      > Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 10:07 AM
      > Subject: Pietenpol-List: Dick's two cylinder Harley engine
      >
      > Heres a company who specializes in using Harley engines in airplanes.
      >
      >
      > Cool idea Dick ! It sounds pretty cool in this video too.
      >
      >
      > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LSTRlAx_YSc
      >
      >
      > href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List
      > href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com
      > href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/c
      >
      >
      
      
      -- 
      Rick Holland
      Castle Rock, Colorado
      
      "Logic is a wreath of pretty flowers, that smell bad"
      
      
Message 33
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Steerable tailwheel- hooked to rudder | 
      
      Thanks Gary and Rick.
      Jeff, those hinges were made by Don Harper, he is a machinist and makes some beautiful
      stuff. Don is a Piet builder and helps in the Sun & Fun wood shop and
      will probably have some hinges, gas tank filler necks, aircraft tie downs and
      his other stuff down there this spring.
      Gary, you can never have too many ;^)
      Skip
      
Message 34
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Sky Scout... | 
      
      
      Yes, let's think about this.  With the Piet, it's never about going faster.  The
      airframe feels most comfortable in a band of airspeed around 65-80 MPH and we're
      not trying to make it go faster by reducing drag.  The force that opposes
      drag is thrust, and it's excess thrust that provides climb.  As your friend has
      discovered, if you reduce drag you have more excess thrust available to help
      you climb.  And we all know that most Piets can use all the help they can get
      in climb, especially when high/hot/heavy.
      
      --------
      Oscar Zuniga
      San Antonio, TX
      Air Camper NX41CC
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=288189#288189
      
      
Message 35
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Sky Scout... | 
      
      
      So streamlined tubing is good, right?  :)
      
      Reducing drag also lets you go the same speed using less thrust and 
      we all know where thrust comes from: Your bank account!
      
      (BTW, for Larry, it is ALWAYS about going faster... >:-})
      
      >
      >Yes, let's think about this.  With the Piet, it's never about going 
      >faster.  The airframe feels most comfortable in a band of airspeed 
      >around 65-80 MPH and we're not trying to make it go faster by 
      >reducing drag.  The force that opposes drag is thrust, and it's 
      >excess thrust that provides climb.  As your friend has discovered, 
      >if you reduce drag you have more excess thrust available to help you 
      >climb.  And we all know that most Piets can use all the help they 
      >can get in climb, especially when high/hot/heavy.
      >
      >--------
      >Oscar Zuniga
      >San Antonio, TX
      >Air Camper NX41CC
      >
      
      -- 
      ---
      
      Jeffrey H. Boatright, Ph.D.
      Associate Professor of Ophthalmology
      Emory University School of Medicine
      Editor-in-Chief
      Molecular Vision
      
      
Message 36
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Sky Scout... | 
      
      You can glue streamlined balsa to the round strut and wrap it with 
      fabric tape and dope it. That's an old idea that was common back when. 
      Worked well, too. It replaces material cost with labor to achieve the 
      result.
      
      If anyone wants a photo I'll try to take one next time I'm at the 
      airport.
      
      David Paule
      
        ----- Original Message ----- 
        From: santiago morete 
        To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com 
        Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 9:10 AM
        Subject: Pietenpol-List: Sky Scout...
      
      
              Ray,
      
              Round tube are structurally better than streamlined struts, 
      subjected to compression, but they are less efficient aerodynamically, 
      as Oscar said.  I chose round struts because that's what I can afford 
      :-) 
              Attached is a photo of a beautiful Piet with round lift struts 
      and streamlined cabanes.
              Saludos
      
              Santiago 
      
      
      -------------------------------------------------------------------------
      -----
      
        Encontra las mejores recetas con Yahoo! Cocina. 
        http://ar.mujer.yahoo.com/cocina/
      
Message 37
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Sky Scout... | 
      
      
      David; where can I buy some of this streamlined balsa, and how much clamping pressure
      should I apply if I glue it to my struts with T88?
      
      ;o)
      
      Please don't kill me... and do not archive
      
      --------
      Oscar Zuniga
      San Antonio, TX
      Air Camper NX41CC
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=288197#288197
      
      
Message 38
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Sky Scout... | 
      
      
      Oscar,
      
      Carve it yourself, and don't crush the balsa when you glue it. You can 
      simply tape it to the tube while the glue dries.
      
      Foam also works.
      http://jackbhart.com/firefly/firefly91.html
      http://jackbhart.com/firefly/firefly93.html
      
      David Paule
      
      
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: "taildrags" <taildrags@hotmail.com>
      Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 12:24 PM
      Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: Sky Scout...
      
      
      >
      > David; where can I buy some of this streamlined balsa, and how much 
      > clamping pressure should I apply if I glue it to my struts with T88?
      >
      > ;o)
      >
      > Please don't kill me... and do not archive
      >
      > --------
      > Oscar Zuniga
      > San Antonio, TX
      > Air Camper NX41CC
      >
      >
      > Read this topic online here:
      >
      > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=288197#288197
      >
      >
      > 
      
      
Message 39
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Sky Scout... | 
      
      
      A round strut is very un-aerodynamic...ish.
      Applying streamline fairings to round struts on a draggy airplane like a Piet will
      most likely result in a speed increase of several MPH, (not a fraction of
      a MPH). I have spoken with a Piet owner who flew with round struts for many years,
      and was very pleased with the results when he added the fairings.
      See the following link for an article about this very topic.
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?t=50119&highlight=streamline
      
      Using round tubes for the struts is a good way to keep costs down, but it would
      be a really good idea to take the time to add streamline fairings to them.
      
      Bill C.
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=288203#288203
      
      
Message 40
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Steerable tailwheel- hooked to rudder | 
      
      I thought about this some more and decided that springs of different 
      spring constants would have no effect. This is because the net torque 
      about the steering axis is the same.
      
      To verify this, I made a simple finite element model and sure enough, 
      with two identical springs I got a certain natural frequency. With one 
      spring slightly lower and one spring slightly higher in value, adding to 
      the same total amount, the resulting natural frequency was identical.
      
      Just use two springs the same, life is simpler that way.
      
      It's damping that prevents the shimmy.
      
      David Paule
      
      
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: "Jim Ash" <ashcan@earthlink.net>
      Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 7:40 AM
      Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Re: Steerable tailwheel- hooked to rudder
      
      
      > 
      > Once upon a time I'd heard from others wiser than I that the two 
      springs should be different. This is so they apply unequal forces on the 
      tailwheel and put a light loading on the linkages. Otherwise, a 
      force-neutral setup could allow an unwanted oscillation which could ruin 
      your day. Picture the flutter that would happen if your elevator weren't 
      loaded to one side; same concept.
      > 
      > Jim Ash
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > -----Original Message----- 
      > From: helspersew@aol.com 
      > Sent: Feb 25, 2010 7:35 AM 
      > To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com 
      > Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Re: Steerable tailwheel- hooked to rudder 
      
      > 
      > 
      > That settles it, I already have some light weight springs I bought 
      from Mcmasters. Hook to rudder!
      > 
      > Dan Helsper
      > Poplar Grove, IL.
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > -----Original Message-----
      > From: bill55 <bliimatainen@antennaplus.com>
      > To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com
      > Sent: Thu, Feb 25, 2010 5:47 am
      > Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: Steerable tailwheel- hooked to rudder
      > 
      > 
      <bliimatainen@antennaplus.com>
      > 
      > Dan,
      > 
      > We just finished and test flew the Model A powered Sky Scout based in 
      Brodhead 
      > (this past November) and originally had the tail skid.  It did not 
      take long to 
      > realize we needed a steerable tail wheel!  We used a Ken Perkins 
      design (due to 
      > time constraint) and attached to the lower rudder with light springs 
      (as Dennis 
      > Hall on his Aircamper).  The process worked great except for the full 
      swivel 
      > design of the tail wheel.  I machined that out and the airplane flys 
      and ground 
      > handles great.  Feel free to check it out at Brodhead as anyone knows 
      how to get 
      > into my hangar.  I was always apprehensive about the horns on the 
      lower rudder 
      > but am convinced this is logical solution (and possibly lighter?) 
      > 
      > Bill Liimatainen
      > Monroe, Wisconsin
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > Read this topic online here:
      > 
      > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=288111#288111
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > t" target=_blank>http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List
      > 
      > tp://forums.matronics.com
      > 
      > _blank>http://www.matronics.com/contribution
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      >
      
Message 41
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Sky Scout... | 
      
      Kip,
      
      Man, there is a lot of information on this site!  My life gets easier 
      all the time!  That would also save a lot of plywood AND work.  Thanks 
      for the suggestion.
      
      Ray
        ----- Original Message ----- 
        From: Kip and Beth Gardner 
        To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com 
        Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 4:56 AM
        Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Sky Scout...
      
      
        Ray, put 1/2" wide 1/8" plywood doublers on either side of your 3/4" 
      spar at each rib station and the problem is solved.  This is what I'm 
      doing on mine, since I inherited 3/4" spars when I bought the project.  
      Keeping the rib openings at 1" allows you to slide them over all the 
      doubler plates for the lift strut attachment fittings, wing tip a bow 
      attach fittings, etc.   If you make the openings 3/4", then you have to 
      slide all the ribs on & then glue all the doublers in place, which seems 
      like a trickier prospect than being able to glue them on with the spar 
      laying flat on a bench.
      
      
        Kip Gardner
      
      
        On Feb 24, 2010, at 11:19 PM, Ray Krause wrote:
      
      
          Thanks, Gary.
      
          The wing is exactly the same, except 27" shorter.  Routing would be 
      a lot of work, but doable.  The ribs I got with the other wood are all 
      built and seem to be made for the 1" spar.  I will have to make a 
      decision on which way to go.
      
          I have been putting in hard points in the fuselage for the seat and 
      shoulder safety belts; thankfully I only need one set!  I put the hard 
      pints one station behind the seat, so I will have to find the right seat 
      belts to fit.  ACS has some that might work, when I get that far.  Got 
      the turtle deck mostly done today, that was fun.
      
          Thanks for the help.
      
          Ray Krause
      
          P.S. Guess I will have to take the Waiex to the Peit fly in.
      
      
            ----- Original Message -----
            From: Gary Boothe
            To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com
            Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 7:59 PM
            Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Sky Scout...
      
      
            No problem, Ray. I took your meaning to be, would the same 
      information apply to a Sky Scout. Having never seen Sky Scout plans, I 
      could not say, with real authority, that a =BE=94 spar is OK for the Sky 
      Scout; however, it is my understanding that the two airplanes are very 
      similar, maybe even the same wing. Lots of conversations on this list 
      point out that vintage aircraft such as the T-craft or Piper Cub, have 
      used an assortment of spar materials, =BE=94 thick. It is my 
      recollection that the same conversation led to the agreement that, after 
      routing, you basically end up with a =BE=94 spar, anyhow.
      
            Please, someone (I know this is a bashful group), if I have 
      mis-directed Ray, please jump in!
      
            Gary Boothe
            Cool, CA
            Pietenpol
            WW Corvair Conversion
            Tail done, Fuselage on gear
            18 ribs done
      
            From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com 
      [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Ray 
      Krause
            Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 12:29 PM
            To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com
            Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Sky Scout...
      
            Gary,
      
            Thanks.  I became confused answering all the e-mails that I 
      started with these questions.  I know that you are building an Air 
      Camper!  Thanks for the info on the spars.
      
            Ray Krause
              ----- Original Message -----
              From: gboothe5@comcast.net
              To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com
              Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 12:15 PM
              Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Sky Scout...
      
              Negative.
              Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
      
      
      ------------------------------------------------------------------------
      
              From: "Ray Krause" <raykrause@frontiernet.net>
              Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 11:24:54 -0800
              To: <pietenpol-list@matronics.com>
              Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Sky Scout...
      
              Gary,
      
              Thanks for the information.  If = using the 3/4"  spar 
      material, would I still rout out the spar as shown in the = plans?  
      Are  you building a Sky Scout?
      
              Ray Krause
                ----- Original Message -----
                From:  gboothe5@comcast.net
                To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com=  
                Sent: Tuesday, February 23, = 2010 9:15  AM
                Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: = Sky  Scout...
      
                Ray,
      
                FYI...3/4" is an acceptable dimension for = spars.  
      
                Gary
                Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
      
      
      ----------------------------------------------------------------------
      
                From: "Ray Krause" <raykrause@frontiernet.net&g= t; 
                Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 07:59:45 -0800
                To: <pietenpol-list@matronics.com= >
                Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Sky Scout...
      
                Thanks, Gary.
      
                I will accept your humility with a = =3D grain  
      of=3D20 salt!  Your beautiful workmanship attests to your =3D  
      abilities!
      
                The point about laminating to avoid = =3D wood  
      defects is=3D20 well taken,  I will follow suit.  After = computing 
      the  costs of =3D the=3D20 metal struts, I am leaning towards 
      the wood = struts!  As  far as the =3D spars=3D20 go, they 
      were included in the wood I got = with the Sky  Scout package; 
      =3D they are=3D20 spruce.  But rather than the 1" = 
      thickness,  they are 3/4", I think I =3D will=3D20 sandwich then 
      with two pieces = of 1/8" birch  plywood to get the 1" (so =3D 
      they fit=3D20 the ribs).  = The Hughes Hardwood =3D place 
      in=3D20 Chico = had beautiful  parallel grain fir that would 
      have made beautiful =3D spars,=3D20 = cheap,  too.  Next time 
      I am in Chico, I will check out the =3D = hickory. =3D20  The 
      ash seems to be really dense/heavy (stronger than hickory?).  = I 
      =3D  will=3D20 try to look it up.
      
                Thanks for the response. And yes, I = =3D have  
      referenced=3D20 Chris's web site and printed many photos.... but it 
      = makes my  eyes and =3D brain=3D20 hurt!
      
                Ray
                  ----- Original Message -----
                  From:=3D20 Gary=3D20  Boothe 
                  To: pietenpol-list@matronics= .com=3D  =3D20
                  Sent: Monday, February 22, 2010 =3D = 3:17=3D20 PM
                  Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: =3D Sky=3D20 = Scout...
      
                  Ray,
      
                  Your=3D20 questions are intelligent and = 
      educated=3D85.attributes to  which I make =3D no personal=3D20 
      claim. In all honesty, I perused = the West  Coast Piet web site 
      to =3D exhaustion.=3D20 Too bad Chris Tracy = doesn=3D92t 
      have  sponsors, or he=3D92d be a rich man! =3D After=3D20 
      looking at every = application  of wood strut that has been built 
      and is =3D flying,=3D20 I decided = it was  doable. 
      Conversations about appropriate woods went =3D from ash=3D20 = to 
      spruce,  including hickory. I decided that I liked the look of =3D 
      hickory = and=3D20 the  decision was that easy. For size, I just 
      used the plans dimensions = =3D for=3D20  steel.
      
                  Later=3D20 conversations with another builder (either = 
      Cliff  Dawson or Douwe =3D Blumberg),=3D20 far  more intelligent 
      and = educated than  I, showed published =3D strengths of=3D20 
      various woods, and = verified that  hickory had plenty of strength 
      for =3D our=3D20 purposes. I think I = can find  that email, 
      but it=3D92s on my other =3D computer at=3D20 home. 
      
                  My=3D20 wing struts will also be hickory, roughly the = 
      shape and  size on the =3D plans.=3D20 Connections will surely 
      be similar to = Douwe=3D92s. All  cabanes and wing =3D struts 
      are=3D20 laminated = because=3D85.that=3D92s what everyone  
      does! Really, it gives you =3D an=3D20 opportunity to rotate the = 
      grain and  eliminate the possibility of =3D having a weak=3D20 
      link. Also, it = looks really  cool!
      
                  My=3D20 wood source is a local hardwood supplier, in = 
      Auburn, Ca  (California=3D20 Hardwoods), who does his own 
      wholesale purchasing = in whatever  length =3D and size=3D20 
      needed. He even mills, if necessary. He = located my fir  spars 
      and sold =3D all four=3D20 for $185!! Bonus is that he helped = 
      build some  wood airplanes and knows =3D what=3D20 grains to 
      look = for.
      
                  Further=3D20 note:  If anything goes wrong, = I=3D92ll 
      blame  Chris Tracy for =3D publishing all=3D20 those = photos!
      
                  Gary=3D20 Boothe
      
                  Cool,=3D20 CA
      
                  Pietenpol
      
                  WW=3D20 Corvair Conversion
      
                  Tail=3D20 done, Fuselage on gear
      
                  18=3D20 ribs done
      
                  From:=3D20  
      owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com=3D20  
      [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of = 
      =3D Ray=3D20 Krause
                  Sent: Monday, February 22, 2010 1:51  PM
                  To: =3D pietenpol-list@matronics.com
                  Subject: = Re:  Pietenpol-List: =3D Sky=3D20 = 
      Scout...
      
                  Gary,
      
                  If I  made =3D these 22"=3D20 struts (front/center) 
      from metal, they would = weigh 22+  ounces without =3D 
      the=3D20 ends. How did you decide on the = thickness and shape  
      for the struts? =3D Why did=3D20 you chose Hickory versus, say = 
      ash?  Did  you laminate because you =3D needed=3D20 to get to a 
      certain = thickness, or for  strength?  There is a =3D source 
      for=3D20 hickory and ash that = has 2" (8/4)  material in Chico, 
      I think.  I =3D got some=3D20 1" ash for = 2.37 per board  
      foot.
      
                  Are  your =3D "flying=3D20 struts" (the long struts) 
      also hickory?  = What=3D20  shape?
      
                  Thanks,
      
                  Ray=3D20 Krause.
      
                  P.S.  The =3D aerostream=3D20 tubing is very 
      expensive, about $56.00 per = front strut  ($28.00/ft and =3D 
      .7593=3D20 lbs/ft). Wicks has it for $17.00/ft = right now. I  
      am not sure of its =3D quality.=3D20 None of the aerotubing matches 
      = the  recommended sizes on the plans (1.5 =3D X .75=3D20 and 
      2" X  1").
      
                    -----  =3D Original=3D20 Message -----
      
                    From: Gary=3D20 Boothe 
      
                    To: pietenpol-list@matron= ics.com=3D  =3D20
      
                    Sent: =3D  Monday, February=3D20 22, 2010 7:31 AM
      
                    Subject:  RE:=3D20 Pietenpol-List: Sky Scout...
      
                    Ray,
      
                    I had a couple free minutes before I took = =3D off 
      for  the=3D20 week. It took 10 seconds to pull off one of the rear 
      = cabanes. It =3D  measures=3D20 21" end-to-end, and weighs 18 
      oz (had to use the = postal=3D20  scales!).
      
                    Gary Boothe
      
                    Cool, Ca.
      
                    Pietenpol
      
                    WW Corvair Conversion, =3D = mounted
      
                    Tail done, Fuselage on gear
      
                    (18 ribs down=3D85)
      
                    -----Original Message-----
                    From: = owner-pi= etenpol=3D  
      -list-server@matronics.com=3D20  
      [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of = 
      Ray=3D20  Krause
                    Sent: Sunday, February 21, 2010 8:54 PM
                    To:=3D20  pietenpol-list@matronics.com
                    Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: = Sky=3D20  Scout...
      
      Krause"=3D20 <raykrause@frontiernet.net>
      
                    Shad,
      
                    Thanks for the comments on the = struts.  =3D I  
      will=3D20 probably go with the 4130
      
                    struts from Wicks.  It is just that I = =3D  
      really=3D20 enjoy the wood working.  If the
      
                    wood were comparable, I would maybe go = 
      that=3D20  way.
      
                    I would appreciate the Dillsburg Aero =3D  
      Reference. =3D20 The size of the metal
      
                    struts is included in the plans; so I can = =3D 
      probably  get=3D20 pretty close to the
      
                    right size.
      
                    Thanks for your help.
      
                    Ray Krause
      
                    ----- Original Message ----- 
      
                    From: "shad bell"=3D20  <aviatorbell@yahoo.com>
      
                    To:=3D20  <pietenpol-list@matronics.com>
      
                    Sent: Saturday, February 20, 2010 = 5:33=3D20  PM
      
                    Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Sky=3D20  Scout...
      
                    > --> Pietenpol-List message posted = =3D by:  
      shad=3D20 bell <aviatorbell@yahoo.com>
      
                    > 
      
                    > 
      
                    > Ray, I am not 100% sure but I would = bet =3D  
      wooden=3D20 struts are heavier than
      
                    > streamlined tube.  The bolts, = and =3D steel  
      end=3D20 fittings that would be
      
                    > required add up fast.  As for = the =3D  
      older=3D20 metal designation, just usse 4130,
      
                    > If you need I can see what dimensions = =3D 
      ours  are,=3D20 some where in the 2 inch
      
                    > by 9/16 (minor axis) .049 wall =3D  thickness. 
      =3D20 also check dillsburg aero works 
      
                    > for tube prices, wicks is also having = a =3D  
      special=3D20 "sale" on streamlined
      
                    > tubing of some dimensions.  I = can =3D look  
      up=3D20 the number for Dillsburg Aero
      
                    > Works in PA if you need me to, I have = a =3D  
      price=3D20 list out in my hanger, he
      
                    > does not have a web =3D = site.
      
                    > 
      
                    > 
      
                    > Shad
      
                    > 
      
                    > 
      
                    > 
      
                    > 
      
                    > 
      
                    > 
      
                    > 
      
                    >
      
      
      <=3D/PRE>http://=www.mat=3Dronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List&=l
      t;=3DB><=3D/PRE>http://forums.matronics.com=3D<=3D/PRE>=3Dhttp:
      //www.matronic=s.com/c=3Dontribution<=3D/PRE>   
      href=3D3D"http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List">http://ww=
      w.mat=3Dronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-Listhref=3D3D"http://forums.ma
      tronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com= 
      href=3D3D"http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.=
      com/c=3D      
      3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=
      3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D=3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=
      3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D=3D=
      3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3
      D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D=3Dhref=3D'3D"http://www.matronics.com/Nav
      igator?Pietenpol-List"'>http://www=.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-L
      ist3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D
      3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D=3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D
      3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D=
      3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=
      3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D=3Dhref=3D'3D"http://forums.matronics.c
      om"'>http://forums.matronics.com3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3
      D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D=3D=3
      D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D
      =3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D=3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D
      =3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D=3Dhref=
      3D'3D"http://www.matronics.com/contribution"'>http://www.matronics.c=om
      /contribution3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=
      3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D=3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=
      3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3
      D=3D=3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3
      D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D=3D  ~=B2=03r  
      3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
      3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
      3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
      3Dhref='3D"http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List"'>http://w
      ww.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
      =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
      3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
      3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3Dhref='3D"http://forums.m
      atronics.com"'>http://forums.matronics.com3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3
      D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
      3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
      3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3Dhref='3D"http://www.matr
      onics.com/contribution"'>http://www.matronics.com/contribution3D=3D=3
      D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
      3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
      3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D 
      ~=B2
      
      --------------------------------------------------------------------
                  r
      
      
      http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-Listhttp://forums.matronics.
      comhttp://www.matronics.com/contribution 
      
      href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List">http://www.mat
      ronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List
      href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com
      href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/c
      
      
      href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List" 
      style="color: blue; text-decoration: underline; 
      ">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List
      blue; text-decoration: underline; ">http://forums.matronics.com
      style="color: blue; text-decoration: underline; 
      ">http://www.matronics.com/contribution
      
      
Message 42
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Sky Scout... | 
      
      Thanks, Jack,
      
      I already have the 3/4" spars, so no need to build them up from plywood. 
       I saw these sketches before and thought about it.
      
      I will keep this as an alternative.
      
      Thanks again.
      
      Ray
        ----- Original Message ----- 
        From: Jack 
        To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com 
        Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 3:27 AM
        Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Sky Scout...
      
      
        Ray,
      
        You could consider a built up spar like attached.  They are a lot of 
      work but strong and just a bit less expensive that solid.  There are 
      more pictures at www.textors.com.
      
        Jack
      
        DSM
      
         
      
         
      
         
      
        Thanks, Gary.
      
         
      
        The wing is exactly the same, except 27" shorter.  Routing would be a 
      lot of work, but doable.  The ribs I got with the other wood are all 
      built and seem to be made for the 1" spar.  I will have to make a 
      decision on which way to go.
      
         
      
        I have been putting in hard points in the fuselage for the seat and 
      shoulder safety belts; thankfully I only need one set!  I put the hard 
      pints one station behind the seat, so I will have to find the right seat 
      belts to fit.  ACS has some that might work, when I get that far.  Got 
      the turtle deck mostly done today, that was fun.
      
         
      
        Thanks for the help.
      
         
      
        Ray Krause
      
         
      
        P.S. Guess I will have to take the Waiex to the Peit fly in.
      
         
      
         
      
          ----- Original Message ----- 
      
          From: Gary Boothe 
      
          To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com 
      
          Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 7:59 PM
      
          Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: Sky Scout...
      
           
      
          No problem, Ray. I took your meaning to be, would the same 
      information apply to a Sky Scout. Having never seen Sky Scout plans, I 
      could not say, with real authority, that a =BE" spar is OK for the Sky 
      Scout; however, it is my understanding that the two airplanes are very 
      similar, maybe even the same wing. Lots of conversations on this list 
      point out that vintage aircraft such as the T-craft or Piper Cub, have 
      used an assortment of spar materials, =BE" thick. It is my recollection 
      that the same conversation led to the agreement that, after routing, you 
      basically end up with a =BE" spar, anyhow. 
      
           
      
          Please, someone (I know this is a bashful group), if I have 
      mis-directed Ray, please jump in!
      
           
      
          Gary Boothe
      
          Cool, CA
      
          Pietenpol
      
          WW Corvair Conversion
      
          Tail done, Fuselage on gear
      
          18 ribs done
      
           
      
          From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com 
      [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Ray 
      Krause
          Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 12:29 PM
          To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com
          Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Sky Scout...
      
           
      
          Gary,
      
           
      
          Thanks.  I became confused answering all the e-mails that I started 
      with these questions.  I know that you are building an Air Camper!  
      Thanks for the info on the spars.
      
           
      
          Ray Krause
      
            ----- Original Message ----- 
      
            From: gboothe5@comcast.net 
      
            To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com 
      
            Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 12:15 PM
      
            Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Sky Scout...
      
             
      
            Negative. 
      
            Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
      
      
      -------------------------------------------------------------------------
      -
      
            From: "Ray Krause" <raykrause@frontiernet.net> 
      
            Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 11:24:54 -0800
      
            To: <pietenpol-list@matronics.com>
      
            Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Sky Scout...
      
             
      
            Gary,
      
             
      
            Thanks for the information.  If = using the 3/4"  spar 
      material, would I still rout out the spar as shown in the = plans?  
      Are  you building a Sky Scout?
      
             
      
            Ray Krause
      
              ----- Original Message ----- 
      
              From:  gboothe5@comcast.net 
      
              To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com=   
      
              Sent: Tuesday, February 23, = 2010 9:15  AM
      
              Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: = Sky  Scout...
      
               
      
              Ray,
      
              FYI...3/4" is an acceptable dimension for = spars.  
      
              Gary 
      
              Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
      
      
      ------------------------------------------------------------------------
      
              From: "Ray Krause" <raykrause@frontiernet.net&g= t;  
      
              Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 07:59:45 -0800
      
              To: <pietenpol-list@matronics.com= >
      
              Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Sky Scout...
      
               
      
              Thanks, Gary.
      
               
      
              I will accept your humility with a = =3D grain  
      of=3D20 salt!  Your beautiful workmanship attests to your =3D  
      abilities!
      
               
      
              The point about laminating to avoid = =3D wood  defects 
      is=3D20 well taken,  I will follow suit.  After = computing the  
      costs of =3D the=3D20 metal struts, I am leaning towards the wood 
      = struts!  As  far as the =3D spars=3D20 go, they were 
      included in the wood I got = with the Sky  Scout package; =3D 
      they are=3D20 spruce.  But rather than the 1" = thickness,  they 
      are 3/4", I think I =3D will=3D20 sandwich then with two pieces = 
      of 1/8" birch  plywood to get the 1" (so =3D they fit=3D20 the 
      ribs).  = The Hughes Hardwood =3D place in=3D20 Chico = had 
      beautiful  parallel grain fir that would have made beautiful =3D 
      spars,=3D20 = cheap,  too.  Next time I am in Chico, I will 
      check out the =3D = hickory. =3D20  The ash seems to be really 
      dense/heavy (stronger than hickory?).  = I =3D  will=3D20 try 
      to look it up.
      
               
      
              Thanks for the response. And yes, I = =3D have  
      referenced=3D20 Chris's web site and printed many photos.... but it 
      = makes my  eyes and =3D brain=3D20 hurt!
      
               
      
              Ray
      
                ----- Original Message ----- 
      
                From:=3D20 Gary=3D20  Boothe  
      
                To: pietenpol-list@matronics= .com=3D  =3D20 
      
                Sent: Monday, February 22, 2010 =3D = 3:17=3D20 PM
      
                Subject: RE: Pietenpol-List: =3D Sky=3D20 = Scout...
      
                 
      
                Ray,
      
                Your=3D20 questions are intelligent and = 
      educated=3D85.attributes to  which I make =3D no personal=3D20 
      claim. In all honesty, I perused = the West  Coast Piet web site 
      to =3D exhaustion.=3D20 Too bad Chris Tracy = doesn=3D92t 
      have  sponsors, or he=3D92d be a rich man! =3D After=3D20 
      looking at every = application  of wood strut that has been built 
      and is =3D flying,=3D20 I decided = it was  doable. 
      Conversations about appropriate woods went =3D from ash=3D20 = to 
      spruce,  including hickory. I decided that I liked the look of =3D 
      hickory = and=3D20 the  decision was that easy. For size, I just 
      used the plans dimensions = =3D for=3D20  steel. 
      
                Later=3D20 conversations with another builder (either = 
      Cliff  Dawson or Douwe =3D Blumberg),=3D20 far  more intelligent 
      and = educated than  I, showed published =3D strengths of=3D20 
      various woods, and = verified that  hickory had plenty of strength 
      for =3D our=3D20 purposes. I think I = can find  that email, 
      but it=3D92s on my other =3D computer at=3D20 home.  
      
                My=3D20 wing struts will also be hickory, roughly the = 
      shape and  size on the =3D plans.=3D20 Connections will surely 
      be similar to = Douwe=3D92s. All  cabanes and wing =3D struts 
      are=3D20 laminated = because=3D85.that=3D92s what everyone  
      does! Really, it gives you =3D an=3D20 opportunity to rotate the = 
      grain and  eliminate the possibility of =3D having a weak=3D20 
      link. Also, it = looks really  cool!
      
                My=3D20 wood source is a local hardwood supplier, in = 
      Auburn, Ca  (California=3D20 Hardwoods), who does his own 
      wholesale purchasing = in whatever  length =3D and size=3D20 
      needed. He even mills, if necessary. He = located my fir  spars 
      and sold =3D all four=3D20 for $185!! Bonus is that he helped = 
      build some  wood airplanes and knows =3D what=3D20 grains to 
      look = for.
      
                Further=3D20 note:  If anything goes wrong, = I=3D92ll 
      blame  Chris Tracy for =3D publishing all=3D20 those = photos!
      
                Gary=3D20 Boothe
      
                Cool,=3D20 CA
      
                Pietenpol
      
                WW=3D20 Corvair Conversion
      
                Tail=3D20 done, Fuselage on gear
      
                18=3D20 ribs done
      
                From:=3D20  
      owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com=3D20  
      [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of = 
      =3D  Ray=3D20 Krause
                Sent: Monday, February 22, 2010 1:51  PM
                To: =3D pietenpol-list@matronics.com
                Subject: = Re:  Pietenpol-List: =3D Sky=3D20 = 
      Scout...
      
                Gary,
      
                If I  made =3D these 22"=3D20 struts (front/center) 
      from metal, they would = weigh 22+  ounces without =3D 
      the=3D20 ends. How did you decide on the = thickness and shape  
      for the struts? =3D Why did=3D20 you chose Hickory versus, say = 
      ash?  Did  you laminate because you =3D needed=3D20 to get to a 
      certain = thickness, or for  strength?  There is a =3D source 
      for=3D20 hickory and ash that = has 2" (8/4)  material in Chico, 
      I think.  I =3D got some=3D20 1" ash for = 2.37 per board  
      foot.
      
                Are  your =3D "flying=3D20 struts" (the long struts) 
      also hickory?  = What=3D20  shape?
      
                Thanks,
      
                Ray=3D20 Krause.
      
                P.S.  The =3D aerostream=3D20 tubing is very 
      expensive, about $56.00 per = front strut  ($28.00/ft and =3D 
      .7593=3D20 lbs/ft). Wicks has it for $17.00/ft = right now. I  
      am not sure of its =3D quality.=3D20 None of the aerotubing matches 
      = the  recommended sizes on the plans (1.5 =3D X .75=3D20 and 
      2" X  1").
      
                  -----  =3D Original=3D20 Message ----- 
      
                  From: Gary=3D20 Boothe  
      
                  To: pietenpol-list@matron= ics.com=3D  =3D20 
      
                  Sent: =3D  Monday, February=3D20 22, 2010 7:31 AM
      
                  Subject:  RE:=3D20 Pietenpol-List: Sky Scout...
      
                  Ray,
      
                  I had a couple free minutes before I took = =3D off 
      for  the=3D20 week. It took 10 seconds to pull off one of the rear 
      = cabanes. It =3D  measures=3D20 21" end-to-end, and weighs 18 
      oz (had to use the = postal=3D20  scales!).
      
                  Gary Boothe
      
                  Cool, Ca.
      
                  Pietenpol
      
                  WW Corvair Conversion, =3D = mounted
      
                  Tail done, Fuselage on gear
      
                  (18 ribs down=3D85)
      
                  -----Original Message-----
                  From: = owner-pi= etenpol=3D  
      -list-server@matronics.com=3D20  
      [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of = 
      Ray=3D20  Krause
                  Sent: Sunday, February 21, 2010 8:54 PM
                  To:=3D20  pietenpol-list@matronics.com
                  Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: = Sky=3D20  Scout...
      
      Krause"=3D20 <raykrause@frontiernet.net>
      
                  Shad,
      
                  Thanks for the comments on the = struts.  =3D I  
      will=3D20 probably go with the 4130 
      
                  struts from Wicks.  It is just that I = =3D  
      really=3D20 enjoy the wood working.  If the 
      
                  wood were comparable, I would maybe go = that=3D20  
      way.
      
                  I would appreciate the Dillsburg Aero =3D  Reference. 
      =3D20 The size of the metal 
      
                  struts is included in the plans; so I can = =3D 
      probably  get=3D20 pretty close to the 
      
                  right size.
      
                  Thanks for your help.
      
                  Ray Krause
      
                  ----- Original Message ----- = 
      
                  From: "shad bell"=3D20  <aviatorbell@yahoo.com>
      
                  To:=3D20  <pietenpol-list@matronics.com>
      
                  Sent: Saturday, February 20, 2010 = 5:33=3D20  PM
      
                  Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Sky=3D20  Scout...
      
                  > --> Pietenpol-List message posted = =3D by:  
      shad=3D20 bell <aviatorbell@yahoo.com>
      
                  > 
      
                  > 
      
                  > Ray, I am not 100% sure but I would = bet =3D  
      wooden=3D20 struts are heavier than 
      
                  > streamlined tube.  The bolts, = and =3D steel  
      end=3D20 fittings that would be 
      
                  > required add up fast.  As for = the =3D  
      older=3D20 metal designation, just usse 4130, 
      
                  > If you need I can see what dimensions = =3D ours  
      are,=3D20 some where in the 2 inch 
      
                  > by 9/16 (minor axis) .049 wall =3D  thickness. 
      =3D20 also check dillsburg aero works = 
      
                  > for tube prices, wicks is also having = a =3D  
      special=3D20 "sale" on streamlined 
      
                  > tubing of some dimensions.  I = can =3D look  
      up=3D20 the number for Dillsburg Aero 
      
                  > Works in PA if you need me to, I have = a =3D  
      price=3D20 list out in my hanger, he 
      
                  > does not have a web =3D = site.
      
                  > 
      
                  > 
      
                  > Shad
      
                  > 
      
                  > 
      
                  > 
      
                  > 
      
                  > 
      
                  > 
      
                  > 
      
                  > 
      
      
      <=3D/PRE>http://=www.mat=3Dronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List&=l
      t;=3DB><=3D/PRE>http://forums.matronics.com=3D<=3D/PRE>=3Dhttp:
      //www.matronic=s.com/c=3Dontribution<=3D/PRE>   
      href=3D3D"http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List">http://ww=
      w.mat=3Dronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-Listhref=3D3D"http://forums.ma
      tronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com= 
      href=3D3D"http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.=
      com/c=3D      
      3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=
      3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D=3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=
      3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D=3D=
      3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3
      D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D=3Dhref=3D'3D"http://www.matronics.com/Nav
      igator?Pietenpol-List"'>http://www=.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-L
      ist3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D
      3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D=3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D
      3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D=
      3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=
      3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D=3Dhref=3D'3D"http://forums.matronics.c
      om"'>http://forums.matronics.com3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3
      D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D=3D=3
      D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D
      =3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D=3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D
      =3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D=3Dhref=
      3D'3D"http://www.matronics.com/contribution"'>http://www.matronics.c=om
      /contribution3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=
      3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D=3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=
      3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3
      D=3D=3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3
      D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D3D=3D=3D  ~=B2=03r  
      3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
      3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
      3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
      3Dhref='3D"http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List"'>http://w
      ww.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
      =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
      3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
      3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3Dhref='3D"http://forums.m
      atronics.com"'>http://forums.matronics.com3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3
      D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
      3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
      3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3Dhref='3D"http://www.matr
      onics.com/contribution"'>http://www.matronics.com/contribution3D=3D=3
      D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
      3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
      3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D 
      ~=B2 
      
      
      ----------------------------------------------------------------------
      
                r 
      
      
      http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-Listhttp://forums.matronics.
      comhttp://www.matronics.com/contribution   
      href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List">http://www.mat
      ronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-Listhref="http://forums.matronics.com">h
      ttp://forums.matronics.comhref="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">
      http://www.matronics.com/c  
      http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-Listhttp://forums.matronics.
      comhttp://www.matronics.com/contribution 
      
Message 43
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Sky Scout... | 
      
      
      Oscar,
      
      It would be nice to see the data on the drag of the various materials, but I 
      will believe you...I plan to use the streamlined material.
      
      I sure enjoy your postings to this site.
      
      Ray
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: "Oscar Zuniga" <taildrags@hotmail.com>
      Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 6:06 AM
      Subject: Pietenpol-List: Sky Scout...
      
      
      >
      >
      > Guys, if you don't already have the original
      > Flying & Glider Manuals, you should get a copy
      > by all means.  Besides the Air Camper and Sky
      > Scout plans and details, there are a whole
      > bunch of other interesting aircraft in them,
      > well worth your time to peruse.
      >
      > And for whoever mentioned that they didn't
      > think there was much difference in drag between
      > round and streamline tubing, there really is.
      > I can dig up the old aircraft design manual
      > that has a graph of relative drag between
      > round, simple teardrop, streamline, and one
      > or two other shapes.  It's significant.
      >
      > Oscar Zuniga
      > Air Camper NX41CC
      > San Antonio, TX
      > mailto: taildrags@hotmail.com
      > website at http://www.flysquirrel.net
      >
      >
      > 
      
      
Message 44
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Steerable tailwheel- hooked to rudder | 
      
      
      This is true. The Cub uses different springs for just this reason.  When I 
      questioned the A&P that changed to new anti-shimmy springs on the Cub; he 
      said this was an old trick that had been learned with many bad experiences. 
      I don't know about the experiences; but the Cub kept the different springs!
      
      Ray
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: "Jim Ash" <ashcan@earthlink.net>
      Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 6:40 AM
      Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Re: Steerable tailwheel- hooked to rudder
      
      
      >
      > Once upon a time I'd heard from others wiser than I that the two springs 
      > should be different. This is so they apply unequal forces on the tailwheel 
      > and put a light loading on the linkages. Otherwise, a force-neutral setup 
      > could allow an unwanted oscillation which could ruin your day. Picture the 
      > flutter that would happen if your elevator weren't loaded to one side; 
      > same concept.
      >
      > Jim Ash
      >
      >
      > -----Original Message----- 
      > From: helspersew@aol.com
      > Sent: Feb 25, 2010 7:35 AM
      > To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com
      > Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Re: Steerable tailwheel- hooked to rudder
      >
      >
      > That settles it, I already have some light weight springs I bought from 
      > Mcmasters. Hook to rudder!
      >
      > Dan Helsper
      > Poplar Grove, IL.
      >
      >
      > -----Original Message-----
      > From: bill55 <bliimatainen@antennaplus.com>
      > To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com
      > Sent: Thu, Feb 25, 2010 5:47 am
      > Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: Steerable tailwheel- hooked to rudder
      >
      >
      > <bliimatainen@antennaplus.com>
      >
      > Dan,
      >
      > We just finished and test flew the Model A powered Sky Scout based in 
      > Brodhead
      > (this past November) and originally had the tail skid.  It did not take 
      > long to
      > realize we needed a steerable tail wheel!  We used a Ken Perkins design 
      > (due to
      > time constraint) and attached to the lower rudder with light springs (as 
      > Dennis
      > Hall on his Aircamper).  The process worked great except for the full 
      > swivel
      > design of the tail wheel.  I machined that out and the airplane flys and 
      > ground
      > handles great.  Feel free to check it out at Brodhead as anyone knows how 
      > to get
      > into my hangar.  I was always apprehensive about the horns on the lower 
      > rudder
      > but am convinced this is logical solution (and possibly lighter?)
      >
      > Bill Liimatainen
      > Monroe, Wisconsin
      >
      >
      > Read this topic online here:
      >
      > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=288111#288111
      >
      >
      > ===================================
      > t" target=_blank>http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List
      > ===================================
      > tp://forums.matronics.com
      > ===================================
      > _blank>http://www.matronics.com/contribution
      > ===================================
      >
      >
      > 
      
      
Message 45
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Dick's two cylinder Harley engine | 
      
      
      There was a little biplane at Brodhead that had one of those Harley engines. It
      was called a Snyder Baby Bomber (I think), and was owned by the late Denny Trone,
      (again, I think). I watched it taxi towards the runway once, but the engine
      stalled part way, and had to be pulled back to the hangar. Not sure if it's
      still there.
      
      Bill C.
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=288215#288215
      
      
      Attachments: 
      
      http://forums.matronics.com//files/brodhead_328_small_186.jpg
      
      
Message 46
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Dick's two cylinder Harley engine | 
      
      
      About five years ago at the Dayton Air Show a University Engineering Class brought
      a 1905 Wright Flyer replica with a Twin Cam 88.  It too had the balanced (
      softtail ) engine.  I'm sure they flew it at Dayton and I think it was at Oshkosh
      the next year.
      
      http://www.usuwrightflyer.org/news/2003-mar13-slt
      
      Dan
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=288216#288216
      
      
Message 47
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | another Russian Aircamper | 
      
      
      http://www.reaa.ru/yabbfiles/Attachments/DSC09481-1_001.JPG
      
      
Message 48
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      
      I think the Sprit of St. Louis" used round tubing for All landing gear,  and
      struts...
      
      Was streamlined with Balsa!  Round Tube is VERY draggy!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
      
      Dave
      
      -----Original Message-----
      From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of Ray
      Krause
      Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 1:55 PM
      Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Sky Scout...
      
      
      <raykrause@frontiernet.net>
      
      Oscar,
      
      It would be nice to see the data on the drag of the various materials, but I
      will believe you...I plan to use the streamlined material.
      
      I sure enjoy your postings to this site.
      
      Ray
      ----- Original Message -----
      From: "Oscar Zuniga" <taildrags@hotmail.com>
      Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 6:06 AM
      Subject: Pietenpol-List: Sky Scout...
      
      
      >
      >
      > Guys, if you don't already have the original
      > Flying & Glider Manuals, you should get a copy
      > by all means.  Besides the Air Camper and Sky
      > Scout plans and details, there are a whole
      > bunch of other interesting aircraft in them,
      > well worth your time to peruse.
      >
      > And for whoever mentioned that they didn't
      > think there was much difference in drag between
      > round and streamline tubing, there really is.
      > I can dig up the old aircraft design manual
      > that has a graph of relative drag between
      > round, simple teardrop, streamline, and one
      > or two other shapes.  It's significant.
      >
      > Oscar Zuniga
      > Air Camper NX41CC
      > San Antonio, TX
      > mailto: taildrags@hotmail.com
      > website at http://www.flysquirrel.net
      >
      >
      
      
Message 49
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Sky Scout... | 
      
      Thanks, Santiago,
      
      Beautiful plane!  The streamline struts seem pretty cheap, at least on 
      initial glance.
      
      Ray
        ----- Original Message ----- 
        From: santiago morete 
        To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com 
        Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 8:10 AM
        Subject: Pietenpol-List: Sky Scout...
      
      
              Ray,
      
              Round tube are structurally better than streamlined struts, 
      subjected to compression, but they are less efficient aerodynamically, 
      as Oscar said.  I chose round struts because that's what I can afford 
      :-) 
              Attached is a photo of a beautiful Piet with round lift struts 
      and streamlined cabanes.
              Saludos
      
              Santiago 
      
      
      -------------------------------------------------------------------------
      -----
      
        Encontra las mejores recetas con Yahoo! Cocina. 
        http://ar.mujer.yahoo.com/cocina/
      
Message 50
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Steerable tailwheel- hooked to rudder | 
      
      
      The trick to FEA is defining a model that's practical enough to be useful. Any
      model of simply a mass and two opposed springs with no dampening is going to define
      a 2nd-order system with a natural resonant frequency. Your excitation forces
      are not going to be applied to the same points in both systems, and with
      direct cables, I suspect your feet end up being the dampeners.
      
      Taking it one step further, if your system has some ugly zeros and poles, the trick
      is to make sure the operating range of your system is well clear of the unstable
      parts. I suspect the differental springs move the center of the oscillation
      away from straight, so as to reduce the chance of it happening during landing
      and takeoff. I suppose the new resonance point would be during a tight fast
      hard turn, like a ground loop, but at that point your tailwheel shimmy is
      probably going to be way down on your list of immediate problems anyhow.
      
      Jim
      
      
      -----Original Message----- 
      From: David Paule 
      Sent: Feb 25, 2010 4:03 PM 
      Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Re: Steerable tailwheel- hooked to rudder 
      
      
      I thought about this some more and decided that springs of different spring constants
      would have no effect. This is because the net torque about the steering
      axis is the same.
      
      To verify this, I made a simple finite element model and sure enough, with two
      identical springs I got a certain natural frequency. With one spring slightly
      lower and one spring slightly higher in value, adding to the same total amount,
      the resulting natural frequency was identical.
      
      Just use two springs the same, life is simpler that way.
      
      It's damping that prevents the shimmy.
      
      David Paule
      
      
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: "Jim Ash" <ashcan@earthlink.net>
      Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 7:40 AM
      Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Re: Steerable tailwheel- hooked to rudder
      
      > 
      > Once upon a time I'd heard from others wiser than I that the two springs should
      be different. This is so they apply unequal forces on the tailwheel and put
      a light loading on the linkages. Otherwise, a force-neutral setup could allow
      an unwanted oscillation which could ruin your day. Picture the flutter that would
      happen if your elevator weren't loaded to one side; same concept.
      > 
      > Jim Ash
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > -----Original Message----- 
      > From: helspersew@aol.com 
      > Sent: Feb 25, 2010 7:35 AM 
      > To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com 
      > Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Re: Steerable tailwheel- hooked to rudder 
      > 
      > 
      > That settles it, I already have some light weight springs I bought from Mcmasters.
      Hook to rudder!
      > 
      > Dan Helsper
      > Poplar Grove, IL.
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > -----Original Message-----
      > From: bill55 <bliimatainen@antennaplus.com>
      > To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com
      > Sent: Thu, Feb 25, 2010 5:47 am
      > Subject: Pietenpol-List: Re: Steerable tailwheel- hooked to rudder
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > Dan,
      > 
      > We just finished and test flew the Model A powered Sky Scout based in Brodhead
      
      > (this past November) and originally had the tail skid.  It did not take long
      to 
      > realize we needed a steerable tail wheel!  We used a Ken Perkins design (due
      to 
      > time constraint) and attached to the lower rudder with light springs (as Dennis
      
      > Hall on his Aircamper).  The process worked great except for the full swivel
      
      > design of the tail wheel.  I machined that out and the airplane flys and ground
      
      > handles great.  Feel free to check it out at Brodhead as anyone knows how to
      get 
      > into my hangar.  I was always apprehensive about the horns on the lower rudder
      
      > but am convinced this is logical solution (and possibly lighter?) 
      > 
      > Bill Liimatainen
      > Monroe, Wisconsin
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > Read this topic online here:
      > 
      > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=288111#288111
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > ==========
      > t" target=_blank>http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List
      > ==========
      > tp://forums.matronics.com
      > ==========
      > _blank>http://www.matronics.com/contribution
      > ==========
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > ==========
      > Pietenpol-List Un/Subscription,
      > --> http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List
      <FONT ="=========
      > bsp;   via the href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com
      <FONT ="=========
      > bsp; - generous support!
      > bsp;                  href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/contribution
      > ==========
      > 
      > 
      > 
      
      
Message 51
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: laminating struts and tv | 
      
      
      I checked the DAP site and found this data sheet what I think is for the better
      product.  I've used it to build my tail feathers and testing shows that the joint
      fails anywhere BUT the actual glue line.  This is also the more water resistant/tolerant
      product than the water activated.  Incidentally, I mix the stuff
      using a beam balance scale my ex-wife got from the US Attorneys office after
      a drug case was adjudicated.  It still has the "Evidence" sticker on it.  One
      of the few useful things I ever got from her.
      
      http://www.dap.com/docs/tech/00030205.pdf
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=288235#288235
      
      
Message 52
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Tailwheel & shimmy | 
      
      This can be useful for those of us who design our own tailwheels. As far as
       I know, (not too far) the main cause of tailwheel shimmy-is an incorrect
       castor angle.
      Saludos
      -
      Santiago=0A=0A=0A      Yahoo! Cocina=0A=0AEncontra las mejores recetas con 
      Yahoo! Cocina.=0A=0A=0Ahttp://ar.mujer.yahoo.com/cocina/
      
Message 53
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Tailwheel & shimmy | 
      
      Isn't that going to change as the spring flexes? Especialy
      on landing?
      
      The one thing I could see happening is that, with the already 
      negative "castor", The angle is going to get closer to the
      horizontal with flexing and negate steering capability.
      
      The principle of differential springs here is paralleled with
      the reason for offsetting the jury struts. Harmonic vibration.
      
      Clif
        "My soul is in the sky." ~ William Shakespeare 
      
              This can be useful for those of us who design our own 
      tailwheels. As far as I know, (not too far) the main cause of tailwheel 
      shimmy is an incorrect castor angle.
              Saludos
      
              Santiago 
      
      
Message 54
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Sky Scout.."Glue" question? | 
      
      The discussion on laminating struts has touched on glue/adhesives to be 
      used, or that could be used.  When building the aircraft, using the two 
      part epoxy adhesives (T-88) is a little cumbersome.  What about single 
      stage poly urethane adhesives/glues, i.e. Gorilla Glue, Titebond?  Has 
      anyone used these, with what results?  There are mixed reviews on this 
      subject: Fine Woodworking (August '07) and 
      woodgears.ca/joint_strength/glue.html .  I am sure there are other 
      reports both supportive and contradictive.
      
      I have tested Gorilla Glue with aircraft spruce and plywood, spruce long 
      grain to long grain and butt to long grain and cross grain:  with proper 
      usage, the wood breaks before the glue bond.  That is, wood grains come 
      off with the break.
      
      Hope this does not cause any consternation!
      
      Ray Krause
      
Message 55
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Steerable tailwheel- hooked to rudder | 
      
      I beg to differ, there is a tailwheel plan in the original plans.  It 
      even has a parking brake incorporated in it.
      
      Gene
        ----- Original Message ----- 
        From: Rick Holland<mailto:at7000ft@gmail.com> 
        To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com<mailto:pietenpol-list@matronics.com> 
        Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 11:14 AM
        Subject: Re: Pietenpol-List: Steerable tailwheel- hooked to rudder
      
      
      <at7000ft@gmail.com<mailto:at7000ft@gmail.com>>
      
        Excellent design Skip. I know we are not supposed to change anything
        from the Piet plans but since the plans do not include a tailwheel
        (and a left and right cable running to a tailwheel control horn), I
        think we can give Skip official dispensation here. I think this design
        simplifies and improves the design of any Piet incorporating a
        tailwheel and is based on a flight proven design (the GN-1). I will do
        it this way on my next Piet project.
      
        Rick
      
        On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Skip Gadd 
      <skipgadd@earthlink.net<mailto:skipgadd@earthlink.net>> wrote:
        > Dan,
        > I made a double horn for rudder and tailwheel steering so the 
      torsional load
        > from the tailwheel would not have to travel through wood. Also since 
      the
        > rudder horn is moved to the bottom of the rudder I added some extra 
      support
        > to spread the load up the rudder. The horns are constructed like
        > Pietenpols, two pieces of .032 edge welded. The attached picture is 
      the
        > current status of the project, so the design has not been flight 
      tested.
        > Skip
        >
        >
        >
        > ----- Original Message -----
        > From:
        > To: 
      pietenpol-list@matronics.com<mailto:pietenpol-list@matronics.com>
        > Sent: 2/24/2010 7:48:58 PM
        > Subject: Pietenpol-List: Steerable tailwheel- hooked to rudder
        > Hi Guys,
        >
        > I have been wrestling with the engineering of making my 
      free-castoring
        > tailwheel into a steerable type. The conventional wisdom on this 
      list has
        > been that one should not connect the tailwheel with the rudder, as 
      per the
        > Aeronca Champ, and many others of that era, due to the fact (?) that 
      the
        > wooden rudder is not strong enough to handle the loads. I see that 
      Ken
        > Perkin's Time Machine is set-up just that way.
        >
        > Any new thoughts on this subject?
        >
        > Dan Helsper
        > Poplar Grove, IL.
        >
        >
      
      
        -- 
        Rick Holland
        Castle Rock, Colorado
      
        "Logic is a wreath of pretty flowers, that smell bad"
      
      
      http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List<http://www.matronics.co
      m/Navigator?Pietenpol-List>
      
      
      http://www.matronics.com/contribution<http://www.matronics.com/contributi
      on>
      
      
Message 56
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Tailwheel & shimmy | 
      
      Santiago,
      
      
      Thanks for posting that! I designed my own tailwheel, but had no idea if the
      geometry was good.now I can check it.
      
      
      Gary Boothe 
      Cool, Ca. 
      Pietenpol 
      WW Corvair Conversion, mounted 
      Tail done, Fuselage on gear 
      (18 ribs down.) 
      
        _____  
      
      From: owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-pietenpol-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of santiago
      morete
      Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 5:26 PM
      Subject: Pietenpol-List: Tailwheel & shimmy
      
      
      This can be useful for those of us who design our own tailwheels. As far as
      I know, (not too far) the main cause of tailwheel shimmy is an incorrect
      castor angle.
      
      Saludos
      
      
      Santiago
      
      
        _____  
      
      
      Encontra las mejores recetas con Yahoo! Cocina. 
      http://ar.mujer.yahoo.com/cocina/
      
      
Message 57
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Sky Scout.."Glue" question? | 
      
      One problem with gorilla glue is that it has not been tested over time.  
      Yes, a glue joint is strong, but in ten years?  twenty?  after repeated 
      temperature changes??  Stick with the known glues, they are not all that 
      expensive.
      
      Gene
        ----- Original Message ----- 
        From: Ray Krause<mailto:raykrause@frontiernet.net> 
        To: pietenpol-list@matronics.com<mailto:pietenpol-list@matronics.com> 
        Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 9:57 PM
        Subject: Pietenpol-List: Sky Scout.."Glue" question?
      
      
        The discussion on laminating struts has touched on glue/adhesives to 
      be used, or that could be used.  When building the aircraft, using the 
      two part epoxy adhesives (T-88) is a little cumbersome.  What about 
      single stage poly urethane adhesives/glues, i.e. Gorilla Glue, Titebond? 
       Has anyone used these, with what results?  There are mixed reviews on 
      this subject: Fine Woodworking (August '07) and 
      woodgears.ca/joint_strength/glue.html .  I am sure there are other 
      reports both supportive and contradictive.
      
        I have tested Gorilla Glue with aircraft spruce and plywood, spruce 
      long grain to long grain and butt to long grain and cross grain:  with 
      proper usage, the wood breaks before the glue bond.  That is, wood 
      grains come off with the break.
      
        Hope this does not cause any consternation!
      
        Ray Krause
      
      
      http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pietenpol-List<http://www.matronics.co
      m/Navigator?Pietenpol-List>
      http://www.matronics.com/contribution<http://www.matronics.com/contributi
      on>
      
      
Message 58
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Tailwheel & shimmy | 
      
      Yes, Clif, I agree with you.- The negative castor angle should be conside
      red with the airplane fully loaded.- Here is the article from where I too
      k the graphic www.pierceaero.net/tws.php
      I think you are right about the springs, in fact, the Maule-anti-shimmy s
      prings that Aircraft Spruce,-and other sells, are nothing more than sprin
      gs of different sizes.
      Saludos
      -
      Santiago=0A=0A=0A      Yahoo! Cocina=0A=0AEncontra las mejores recetas con 
      Yahoo! Cocina.=0A=0A=0Ahttp://ar.mujer.yahoo.com/cocina/
      
 
Other Matronics Email List Services
 
 
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
 
 
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
  
 |