Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 12:07 AM - Re: Reviving the Pulsar (simonnelson@vodamail.co.za)
2. 12:36 AM - Re: Reviving the Pulsar (Pulsar Henry)
3. 06:17 AM - Re: Reviving the Pulsar (GREGSMI@aol.com)
Message 1
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Reviving the Pulsar |
Have you guys seen the Sling from South Africa?
Sy
Sent via my BlackBerry from Vodacom - let your email find you!
-----Original Message-----
From: Kym Cleggett <kymc@internode.on.net>
Sender: owner-pulsar-list-server@matronics.com
No need to change anything as there is already a "bigger" Pulsar the SP100. Same
wings and great looks but bigger fuselage with more width and headroom. Loved
mine and was most upset to lose it in an out landing following an engine failure.
Kym
Australia
On 28/07/2011, at 3:57 AM, rockford67 wrote:
>
> Okay, since there isn't much chat happening...thought this might make for interesting
discussion.
>
> so here's a longshot....
>
> Seems that lightweight, fuel efficient affordable aircraft are going to quickly
become the most desirable, unless you have an unlimited fuel budget. A trip
in my 172 leaving this weekend is going to run me $800 in fuel for about 14
hours flying there and back - ouch! If only my Pulsar was through with it's import...
>
> So who has the tooling and rights to the Pulsar XP these days? Is it still in
El Salvador? Was new tooling built down there? The more I tinker with mine the
more I think the kit needs to be put back into production, albeit with some
improvements. I wonder what it would really take to accomplish this and how much
money would be involved?
>
> Imagine a light sport eligible example, only a bit bigger, with a 912 or 914.
It could easily meet the requirements of LSA without changing the lines of the
original design....
>
> Chris
>
>
>
>
> Read this topic online here:
>
> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=347862#347862
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Message 2
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Reviving the Pulsar |
Hi Solly
You're right The Sp100 is really the best.
I'm flying with my Sp 100 since 3 years now and I must say it=B4s very
confortable.
Henry Schlueter
D - E O H S
----- Original Message -----
From: Solly Melyon
To: pulsar-list@matronics.com
Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2011 3:25 AM
Subject: Re: Pulsar-List: Reviving the Pulsar
Hei Kym,
Thanks a lot for the complement. The SP100 is truely the best
plane out there.
Solly Melyon
AeroMax Aviation
www.aeromaxaviation.com
323.841.4822
--- On Wed, 7/27/11, Kym Cleggett <kymc@internode.on.net> wrote:
From: Kym Cleggett <kymc@internode.on.net>
Subject: Re: Pulsar-List: Reviving the Pulsar
To: pulsar-list@matronics.com
Date: Wednesday, July 27, 2011, 3:17 PM
<kymc@internode.on.net>
No need to change anything as there is already a "bigger"
Pulsar the SP100. Same wings and great looks but bigger fuselage with
more width and headroom. Loved mine and was most upset to lose it in an
out landing following an engine failure.
Kym
Australia
On 28/07/2011, at 3:57 AM, rockford67 wrote:
<cphorsten@yahoo.ca>
>
> Okay, since there isn't much chat happening...thought this
might make for interesting discussion.
>
> so here's a longshot....
>
> Seems that lightweight, fuel efficient affordable aircraft
are going to quickly become the most desirable, unless you have an
unlimited fuel budget. A trip in my 172 leaving this weekend is going to
run me $800 in fuel for about 14 hours flying there and back - ouch! If
only my Pulsar was through with it's import...
>
> So who has the tooling and rights to the Pulsar XP these
days? Is it still in El Salvador? Was new tooling built down there? The
more I tinker with mine the more I think the kit needs to be put back
into production, albeit with some improvements. I wonder what it would
really take to accomplish this and how much money would be involved?
>
> Imagine a light sport eligible example, only a bit bigger,
with a 912 or 914. It could easily meet the requirements of LSA without
changing the lines of the original design....
>
> Chris
>
>
>
>
> Read this topic online here:
>
> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=347862#347862
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
vigator?Pulsar-List"
target=_blank>http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pulbsp; -
MATRONICS WEB FORUMS - href="http://forums.matronics.com/"
target=_blank>http://forums.matronbsp; - List Contribution
Web Site
-http://www=====================
=
Message 3
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Reviving the Pulsar |
Henry, can we get an update on the performance of the UL260 in your Pulsar?
We sure would like to hear all about it.
Thanks
Greg
In a message dated 7/28/2011 2:37:05 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
pulsarhenry@t-online.de writes:
Hi Solly
You're right The Sp100 is really the best.
I'm flying with my Sp 100 since 3 years now and I must say it=B4s very
confortable.
Henry Schlueter
D - E O H S
----- Original Message -----
From: _Solly Melyon_ (mailto:sollymelyon@yahoo.com)
Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2011 3:25 AM
Subject: Re: Pulsar-List: Reviving the Pulsar
Hei Kym,
Thanks a lot for the complement. The SP100 is truely the best plane out
there.
Solly Melyon
AeroMax Aviation
_www.aeromaxaviation.com_ (http://www.aeromaxaviation.com/)
323.841.4822
--- On Wed, 7/27/11, Kym Cleggett <_kymc@internode.on.net_
(mailto:kymc@internode.on.net) > wrote:
From: Kym Cleggett <_kymc@internode.on.net_ (mailto:kymc@internode.on.net)
>
Subject: Re: Pulsar-List: Reviving the Pulsar
(http://us.mc834.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=kymc@internode.on.net) >
No need to change anything as there is already a "bigger" Pulsar the
SP100. Same wings and great looks but bigger fuselage with more width and
headroom. Loved mine and was most upset to lose it in an out landing foll
owing
an engine failure.
Kym
Australia
On 28/07/2011, at 3:57 AM, rockford67 wrote:
(http://us.mc834.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=cphorsten@yahoo.ca) >
>
> Okay, since there isn't much chat happening...thought this might make
for interesting discussion.
>
> so here's a longshot....
>
> Seems that lightweight, fuel efficient affordable aircraft are going to
quickly become the most desirable, unless you have an unlimited fuel
budget. A trip in my 172 leaving this weekend is going to run me $800 in f
uel
for about 14 hours flying there and back - ouch! If only my Pulsar was
through with it's import...
>
> So who has the tooling and rights to the Pulsar XP these days? Is it
still in El Salvador? Was new tooling built down there? The more I tinker
with
mine the more I think the kit needs to be put back into production, albeit
with some improvements. I wonder what it would really take to accomplish
this and how much money would be involved?
>
> Imagine a light sport eligible example, only a bit bigger, with a 912 or
914. It could easily meet the requirements of LSA without changing the
lines of the original design....
>
> Chris
>
>
>
>
> Read this topic online here:
>
> _http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=347862#347862_
(http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=347862#347862)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
vigator?Pulsar-List"
target=_blank>http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pulbsp; - MATRONICS W
EB FORUMS - href="http://forums.matronics.com/"
target=_blank>http://forums.matronbsp; - List Contribution Web Sit
e
-http://www=====================
=
href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pulsar-List">http://www.matronhr
ef="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com
href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/c
(http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pulsar-List)
(http://www.matronics.com/contribution)
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|