Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 05:28 AM - Re: Pulsar-List Digest: 12 Msgs - 08/29/13 (Mark Fox)
2. 06:49 AM - WTB: Rear Rt Side XP Window (helikhat@peak.org)
3. 01:04 PM - (dlelkins@juno.com)
4. 02:28 PM - Re: (Coleman)
5. 02:41 PM - Re: (Brian Anderson)
Message 1
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Pulsar-List Digest: 12 Msgs - 08/29/13 |
Thanks everybody
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 2:58 AM, Pulsar-List Digest Server <
pulsar-list@matronics.com> wrote:
> *
>
> =================================================
> Online Versions of Today's List Digest Archive
> =================================================
>
> Today's complete Pulsar-List Digest can also be found in either of the
> two Web Links listed below. The .html file includes the Digest formatted
> in HTML for viewing with a web browser and features Hyperlinked Indexes
> and Message Navigation. The .txt file includes the plain ASCII version
> of the Pulsar-List Digest and can be viewed with a generic text editor
> such as Notepad or with a web browser.
>
> HTML Version:
>
>
> http://www.matronics.com/digest/digestview.php?Style=82701&View=html&Chapter 13-08-29&Archive=Pulsar
>
> Text Version:
>
>
> http://www.matronics.com/digest/digestview.php?Style=82701&View=txt&Chapter 13-08-29&Archive=Pulsar
>
>
> ===============================================
> EMail Version of Today's List Digest Archive
> ===============================================
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> Pulsar-List Digest Archive
> ---
> Total Messages Posted Thu 08/29/13: 12
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> Today's Message Index:
> ----------------------
>
> 1. 04:24 AM - Gross Take off Weight (Mark Fox)
> 2. 04:36 AM - Re: Gross Take off Weight (Scott - Special Effects
> Armourer)
> 3. 05:00 AM - Re: Gross Take off Weight (Keith Palmer)
> 4. 06:21 AM - Re: Gross Take off Weight (Keith Palmer)
> 5. 06:41 AM - Re: Gross Take off Weight (Scott - Special Effects
> Armourer)
> 6. 07:00 AM - Re: Gross Take off Weight (Keith Palmer)
> 7. 08:08 AM - Re: Gross Take off Weight (Simon)
> 8. 10:13 AM - Re: Gross Take off Weight (HUGH COULTER)
> 9. 11:45 AM - Re: Gross Take off Weight (Solly Melyon)
> 10. 12:14 PM - Re: Gross Take off Weight (Larry Eubanks)
> 11. 12:31 PM - Re: Gross Take off Weight (Larry Eubanks)
> 12. 03:21 PM - Max Gross (Bernard Wilder)
>
>
> ________________________________ Message 1
> _____________________________________
>
>
> Time: 04:24:09 AM PST US
> Subject: Pulsar-List: Gross Take off Weight
> From: Mark Fox <saafbusiness@gmail.com>
>
> Guys,
>
> I know this is a 10+ year old discussion item, but I can not remember the
> result and general consensus in the end.
>
> My 1996 Pulsar XP from Aerodesigns had a max gross weight of 1060 pounds.
> There was a lot of discussion about that number being changed to a higher
> number.
>
> Just curious if anyone knows.
>
> I ask because after 9 months or reworking wings, they put on a few pounds
> :)
>
> Thanks
>
> --
>
> [image: Mark L. Fox Vice President
> 321-626-4786]<http://myesig.com/esig/link-174057.php><
> http://myesig.com/esig/link-174063.php><
> http://myesig.com/esig/link-174061.php><
> http://myesig.com/esig/link-174062.php>
>
> myesig.com <http://www.myesig.com/r.php?rc=CEA8A3>
>
> ________________________________ Message 2
> _____________________________________
>
>
> Time: 04:36:17 AM PST US
> From: Scott - Special Effects Armourer <scott@s-f-x.com>
> Subject: Re: Pulsar-List: Gross Take off Weight
>
> I am just increasing my rating for more max weight. It was 960lbs if your
> ki
> t was 249 or less, if a higher number it would be 1060lbs. It seems a
> compos
> ite spar was used on later models. Source - UK LAA TADS for Pulsar XP.
>
> Hope that helps.
>
> Scott MacIntyre
>
> UK +44 7860 208432
> US +1 (818) 397 0666
> scott@s-f-x.com
>
> On 29 Aug 2013, at 12:21, Mark Fox <saafbusiness@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Guys,
> >
> > I know this is a 10+ year old discussion item, but I can not remember
> the r
> esult and general consensus in the end.
> >
> > My 1996 Pulsar XP from Aerodesigns had a max gross weight of 1060
> pounds. T
> here was a lot of discussion about that number being changed to a higher
> num
> ber.
> >
> > Just curious if anyone knows.
> >
> > I ask because after 9 months or reworking wings, they put on a few
> pounds :
> )
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > --
> >
> >
> >
> > myesig.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
> =========================
> ========
> =========================
> ========
> =========================
> ========
> =========================
> ========
> >
>
> ________________________________ Message 3
> _____________________________________
>
>
> Time: 05:00:33 AM PST US
> From: "Keith Palmer" <kdpalmer@mweb.co.za>
> Subject: Re: Pulsar-List: Gross Take off Weight
>
> The XP is definitely 1060 lb the III is 1200lb the II I'm not sure ?
>
> K'd
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Mark Fox
> To: Pulsar-List@matronics.com
> Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2013 1:21 PM
> Subject: Pulsar-List: Gross Take off Weight
>
>
> Guys,
>
>
> I know this is a 10+ year old discussion item, but I can not remember
> the result and general consensus in the end.
>
>
> My 1996 Pulsar XP from Aerodesigns had a max gross weight of 1060
> pounds. There was a lot of discussion about that number being changed to
> a higher number.
>
>
> Just curious if anyone knows.
>
>
> I ask because after 9 months or reworking wings, they put on a few
> pounds :)
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
> --
>
>
> myesig.com
>
>
> ________________________________ Message 4
> _____________________________________
>
>
> Time: 06:21:07 AM PST US
> From: "Keith Palmer" <kdpalmer@mweb.co.za>
> Subject: Re: Pulsar-List: Gross Take off Weight
>
> Scott,
> MAUW - Wooden Spars with Capping to the end of the Spar - 960lb
> - Composite Spars on XP 1060lb - Don't automatically go by serial
> numbers it is the construction that counts & what was included in that
> KIT.
>
> K'd
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Scott - Special Effects Armourer
> To: pulsar-list@matronics.com
> Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2013 1:33 PM
> Subject: Re: Pulsar-List: Gross Take off Weight
>
>
> I am just increasing my rating for more max weight. It was 960lbs if
> your kit was 249 or less, if a higher number it would be 1060lbs. It
> seems a composite spar was used on later models. Source - UK LAA TADS
> for Pulsar XP.
>
>
> Hope that helps.
>
> Scott MacIntyre
>
>
> UK +44 7860 208432
> US +1 (818) 397 0666
> scott@s-f-x.com
>
> On 29 Aug 2013, at 12:21, Mark Fox <saafbusiness@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Guys,
>
>
> I know this is a 10+ year old discussion item, but I can not
> remember the result and general consensus in the end.
>
>
> My 1996 Pulsar XP from Aerodesigns had a max gross weight of 1060
> pounds. There was a lot of discussion about that number being changed to
> a higher number.
>
>
> Just curious if anyone knows.
>
>
> I ask because after 9 months or reworking wings, they put on a few
> pounds :)
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
> --
>
>
> myesig.com
>
>
> ========
> tp://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pulsar-List
> ========
> cs.com
> ========
> matronics.com/contribution
> ========
>
>
> ________________________________ Message 5
> _____________________________________
>
>
> Time: 06:41:56 AM PST US
> From: Scott - Special Effects Armourer <scott@s-f-x.com>
> Subject: Re: Pulsar-List: Gross Take off Weight
>
> Yes, common sense prevails - I have a composite spar but it seems the guy
> th
> at made the kit went for the lower weight just because he wasn't aware of
> th
> e later spec.
>
> Thanks for helping make this point clearer.
>
>
> Scott MacIntyre
>
>
> On 29 Aug 2013, at 14:18, "Keith Palmer" <kdpalmer@mweb.co.za> wrote:
>
> > Scott,
> > MAUW - Wooden Spars with Capping to the end of the Spar - 960lb -
> Composite Spars on XP 1060lb - Don't automatically go by serial numbers
> i
> t is the construction that counts & what was included in that KIT.
> >
> > K'd
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Scott - Special Effects Armourer
> > To: pulsar-list@matronics.com
> > Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2013 1:33 PM
> > Subject: Re: Pulsar-List: Gross Take off Weight
> >
> > I am just increasing my rating for more max weight. It was 960lbs if
> your k
> it was 249 or less, if a higher number it would be 1060lbs. It seems a
> compo
> site spar was used on later models. Source - UK LAA TADS for Pulsar XP.
> >
> > Hope that helps.
> >
> > Scott MacIntyre
> >
> > UK +44 7860 208432
> > US +1 (818) 397 0666
> > scott@s-f-x.com
> >
> > On 29 Aug 2013, at 12:21, Mark Fox <saafbusiness@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Guys,
> >>
> >> I know this is a 10+ year old discussion item, but I can not remember
> the
> result and general consensus in the end.
> >>
> >> My 1996 Pulsar XP from Aerodesigns had a max gross weight of 1060
> pounds.
> There was a lot of discussion about that number being changed to a higher
> n
> umber.
> >>
> >> Just curious if anyone knows.
> >>
> >> I ask because after 9 months or reworking wings, they put on a few
> pounds
> :)
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >> --
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> myesig.com
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ========
> >> tp://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pulsar-List
> >> ========
> >> cs.com
> >> ========
> >> matronics.com/contribution
> >> ========
> >>
> >
> >
> > href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pulsar-List">http://www.matronh
> ref="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com
> > href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/c
> >
> >
> =========================
> ========
> =========================
> ========
> =========================
> ========
> =========================
> ========
> >
>
> ________________________________ Message 6
> _____________________________________
>
>
> Time: 07:00:26 AM PST US
> From: "Keith Palmer" <kdpalmer@mweb.co.za>
> Subject: Re: Pulsar-List: Gross Take off Weight
>
> What do your manuals say ?
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Scott - Special Effects Armourer
> To: pulsar-list@matronics.com
> Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2013 3:39 PM
> Subject: Re: Pulsar-List: Gross Take off Weight
>
>
> Yes, common sense prevails - I have a composite spar but it seems the
> guy that made the kit went for the lower weight just because he wasn't
> aware of the later spec.
>
>
> Thanks for helping make this point clearer.
>
>
> Scott MacIntyre
>
>
> On 29 Aug 2013, at 14:18, "Keith Palmer" <kdpalmer@mweb.co.za> wrote:
>
>
> Scott,
> MAUW - Wooden Spars with Capping to the end of the Spar -
> 960lb - Composite Spars on XP 1060lb - Don't automatically go by
> serial numbers it is the construction that counts & what was included in
> that KIT.
>
> K'd
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Scott - Special Effects Armourer
> To: pulsar-list@matronics.com
> Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2013 1:33 PM
> Subject: Re: Pulsar-List: Gross Take off Weight
>
>
> I am just increasing my rating for more max weight. It was 960lbs
> if your kit was 249 or less, if a higher number it would be 1060lbs. It
> seems a composite spar was used on later models. Source - UK LAA TADS
> for Pulsar XP.
>
>
> Hope that helps.
>
> Scott MacIntyre
>
>
> UK +44 7860 208432
> US +1 (818) 397 0666
> scott@s-f-x.com
>
> On 29 Aug 2013, at 12:21, Mark Fox <saafbusiness@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Guys,
>
>
> I know this is a 10+ year old discussion item, but I can not
> remember the result and general consensus in the end.
>
>
> My 1996 Pulsar XP from Aerodesigns had a max gross weight of
> 1060 pounds. There was a lot of discussion about that number being
> changed to a higher number.
>
>
> Just curious if anyone knows.
>
>
> I ask because after 9 months or reworking wings, they put on a
> few pounds :)
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
> --
>
>
> myesig.com
>
>
> ========
> tp://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pulsar-List
> ========
> cs.com
> ========
> matronics.com/contribution
> ========
>
>
> href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pulsar-List">http://www.matron
> href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com
> href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/c
>
>
> 3D==============
> 3D==============
> 3D==============
> 3D
> 3D==============
> 3D==============
> 3D==============
> 3D
> 3D==============
> 3D==============
> 3D==============
> 3D
> 3D==============
> 3D==============
> 3D==============
> 3D
>
>
> ________________________________ Message 7
> _____________________________________
>
>
> Time: 08:08:39 AM PST US
> From: "Simon" <simon@design24.org.uk>
> Subject: RE: Pulsar-List: Gross Take off Weight
>
> Hi Scott,
>
>
> At the time the kit was built, they had just introduced the composite
> spar and Aero Designs had updated their brochure for the XP - (960
> crossed out and 1060 written in biro!)
>
>
> The PFA at the time had not approved this and so to save time getting
> into the air, Malcolm went with the original 960. It should only be a
> formality to up-rate the figure =93 He and I just never got around
> to it! It definitely has the composite spar and also the slightly bigger
> rudder =93 maybe XPs had this.
>
>
> Looking forward to seeing her airborne again soon J
>
>
> Simon.
>
>
> From: owner-pulsar-list-server@matronics.com
> [mailto:owner-pulsar-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Scott -
> Special Effects Armourer
> Sent: 29 August 2013 14:40
> Subject: Re: Pulsar-List: Gross Take off Weight
>
>
> Yes, common sense prevails - I have a composite spar but it seems the
> guy that made the kit went for the lower weight just because he wasn't
> aware of the later spec.
>
>
> Thanks for helping make this point clearer.
>
>
> Scott MacIntyre
>
>
> On 29 Aug 2013, at 14:18, "Keith Palmer" <kdpalmer@mweb.co.za> wrote:
>
> Scott,
>
> MAUW - Wooden Spars with Capping to the end of the Spar - 960lb
> - Composite Spars on XP 1060lb - Don't automatically go by serial
> numbers it is the construction that counts & what was included in that
> KIT.
>
>
> K'd
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
> From: Scott - Special Effects Armourer <mailto:scott@s-f-x.com>
>
>
> Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2013 1:33 PM
>
> Subject: Re: Pulsar-List: Gross Take off Weight
>
>
> I am just increasing my rating for more max weight. It was 960lbs if
> your kit was 249 or less, if a higher number it would be 1060lbs. It
> seems a composite spar was used on later models. Source - UK LAA TADS
> for Pulsar XP.
>
>
> Hope that helps.
>
> Scott MacIntyre
>
>
> UK +44 7860 208432
>
> US +1 (818) 397 0666
>
> scott@s-f-x.com
>
>
> On 29 Aug 2013, at 12:21, Mark Fox <saafbusiness@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Guys,
>
>
> I know this is a 10+ year old discussion item, but I can not remember
> the result and general consensus in the end.
>
>
> My 1996 Pulsar XP from Aerodesigns had a max gross weight of 1060
> pounds. There was a lot of discussion about that number being changed to
> a higher number.
>
>
> Just curious if anyone knows.
>
>
> I ask because after 9 months or reworking wings, they put on a few
> pounds :)
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
> --
>
>
> Mark L. Fox Vice President 321-626-4786
> <http://myesig.com/esig/logo-232491.gif>
>
>
> <http://myesig.com/esig/link-174057.php>
>
> <http://myesig.com/esig/link-174063.php>
>
> <http://myesig.com/esig/link-174061.php>
>
> <http://myesig.com/esig/link-174062.php>
>
> myesig.com <http://www.myesig.com/r.php?rc=CEA8A3>
>
>
> ========
> tp://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pulsar-List
> ========
> cs.com
> ========
> matronics.com/contribution
> ========
>
>
> href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pulsar-List">http://www.matron
> href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com
> href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/c
>
>
> 3D==============
> 3D==============
> 3D==============
> 3D
> 3D==============
> 3D==============
> 3D==============
> 3D
> 3D==============
> 3D==============
> 3D==============
> 3D
> 3D==============
> 3D==============
> 3D==============
> 3D
>
>
> ________________________________ Message 8
> _____________________________________
>
>
> Time: 10:13:54 AM PST US
> From: "HUGH COULTER" <ccoulter@wavecable.com>
> Subject: Re: Pulsar-List: Gross Take off Weight
>
>
> No, the weight was not increased. The Series II had a
> higher gross as did the III.
>
> Clarke
>
> On Thu, 29 Aug 2013 07:21:44 -0400
> Mark Fox <saafbusiness@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Guys,
> >
> > I know this is a 10+ year old discussion item, but I can
> >not remember the
> > result and general consensus in the end.
> >
> > My 1996 Pulsar XP from Aerodesigns had a max gross
> >weight of 1060 pounds.
> > There was a lot of discussion about that number being
> >changed to a higher
> > number.
> >
> > Just curious if anyone knows.
> >
> > I ask because after 9 months or reworking wings, they
> >put on a few pounds :)
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > --
> >
> > [image: Mark L. Fox Vice President
> > 321-626-4786]<http://myesig.com/esig/link-174057.php><
> http://myesig.com/esig/link-174063.php><
> http://myesig.com/esig/link-174061.php><
> http://myesig.com/esig/link-174062.php>
> >
> > myesig.com <http://www.myesig.com/r.php?rc=CEA8A3>
>
>
> ________________________________ Message 9
> _____________________________________
>
>
> Time: 11:45:54 AM PST US
> From: Solly Melyon <sollymelyon@yahoo.com>
> Subject: Re: Pulsar-List: Gross Take off Weight
>
> Hi Guys,=0AThe II and the III are-the same airplane structurally, both ha
> d a =0AGW of 1200 lb=0ASolly Melyon=0AAeroMax Aviation=0Awww.aeromaxaviatio
> n.com=0A323.841.4822=0A =0A=0A________________________________=0A From:
> HUG
> H COULTER <ccoulter@wavecable.com>=0ATo: pulsar-list@matronics.com=0ASent:
> Thursday, August 29, 2013 10:12 AM=0ASubject: Re: Pulsar-List: Gross Take
> ulter@wavecable.com>=0A=0ANo, the weight was not increased.- The Series I
> I had a higher gross as did the III.=0A=0AClarke=0A=0AOn Thu, 29 Aug 2013 0
> 7:21:44 -0400=0AMark Fox <saafbusiness@gmail.com> wrote:=0A> Guys,=0A>
> =0A>
> I know this is a 10+ year old discussion item, but I can not remember the
> =0A> result and general consensus in the end.=0A> =0A> My 1996 Pulsar XP fr
> om Aerodesigns had a max gross weight of 1060 pounds.=0A> There was a lot o
> f discussion about that number being changed to a higher=0A> number.=0A>
> =0A> Just curious if anyone knows.=0A> =0A> I ask because after 9 months or
> reworking wings, they put on a few pounds :)=0A> =0A> Thanks=0A> =0A> --
> =0A> [image: Mark L. Fox Vice President=0A> 321-626-4786]<
> http://myesig.com
> /esig/link-174057.php><http://myesig.com/esig/link-174063.php><
> http://myesi
> g.com/esig/link-174061.php><http://myesig.com/esig/link-174062.php>=0A>
> =0A
> ==========
>
> ________________________________ Message 10
> ____________________________________
>
>
> Time: 12:14:43 PM PST US
> From: "Larry Eubanks" <leubanks@sunflower.com>
> Subject: Re: Pulsar-List: Gross Take off Weight
>
> I have a sales brochure that is pre XP and was intended for the 582
> version only and it shows a fiberglass spar, wood skins and a gross
> weight of 900 pounds. Unfortunately the brochure is not dated but was
> fairly expensive to produce as it is done similar to a magazine with
> about 12 pages.
> Larry
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Keith Palmer
> To: pulsar-list@matronics.com
> Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2013 8:18 AM
> Subject: Re: Pulsar-List: Gross Take off Weight
>
>
> Scott,
> MAUW - Wooden Spars with Capping to the end of the Spar - 960lb
> - Composite Spars on XP 1060lb - Don't automatically go by serial
> numbers it is the construction that counts & what was included in that
> KIT.
>
> K'd
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Scott - Special Effects Armourer
> To: pulsar-list@matronics.com
> Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2013 1:33 PM
> Subject: Re: Pulsar-List: Gross Take off Weight
>
>
> I am just increasing my rating for more max weight. It was 960lbs if
> your kit was 249 or less, if a higher number it would be 1060lbs. It
> seems a composite spar was used on later models. Source - UK LAA TADS
> for Pulsar XP.
>
>
> Hope that helps.
>
> Scott MacIntyre
>
>
> UK +44 7860 208432
> US +1 (818) 397 0666
> scott@s-f-x.com
>
> On 29 Aug 2013, at 12:21, Mark Fox <saafbusiness@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Guys,
>
>
> I know this is a 10+ year old discussion item, but I can not
> remember the result and general consensus in the end.
>
>
> My 1996 Pulsar XP from Aerodesigns had a max gross weight of 1060
> pounds. There was a lot of discussion about that number being changed to
> a higher number.
>
>
> Just curious if anyone knows.
>
>
> I ask because after 9 months or reworking wings, they put on a few
> pounds :)
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
> --
>
>
> myesig.com
>
>
> ========
> tp://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pulsar-List
> ========
> cs.com
> ========
> matronics.com/contribution
> ========
>
>
> href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Pulsar-List">http://www.matron
> href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com
> href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/c
>
>
> ________________________________ Message 11
> ____________________________________
>
>
> Time: 12:31:04 PM PST US
> From: "Larry Eubanks" <leubanks@sunflower.com>
> Subject: Re: Pulsar-List: Gross Take off Weight
>
> For what it's worth I have another later sales brochure created after
> the first 912 version was built and it has a picture of the ill fated
> N912XP on one side. It shows a gross weight for the 582 Pulsar as 1000
> pounds and the Pulsar XP(912) as 1060. I believe the difference here is
> that this was after the fiberglass skins were added to both models.
> Larry
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Larry Eubanks
> To: pulsar-list@matronics.com
> Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2013 2:12 PM
> Subject: Re: Pulsar-List: Gross Take off Weight
>
>
> I have a sales brochure that is pre XP and was intended for the 582
> version only and it shows a fiberglass spar, wood skins and a gross
> weight of 900 pounds. Unfortunately the brochure is not dated but was
> fairly expensive to produce as it is done similar to a magazine with
> about 12 pages.
> Larry
>
> ________________________________ Message 12
> ____________________________________
>
>
> Time: 03:21:38 PM PST US
> Subject: Pulsar-List: Max Gross
> From: Bernard Wilder <bernard.wilder2@gmail.com>
>
>
> I know someone who routinely flew his XP at 1,200 lbs.
>
> Bernie Wilder
>
>
--
[image: Mark L. Fox Vice President
321-626-4786]<http://myesig.com/esig/link-174057.php><http://myesig.com/esig/link-174063.php><http://myesig.com/esig/link-174061.php><http://myesig.com/esig/link-174062.php>
myesig.com <http://www.myesig.com/r.php?rc=CEA8A3>
Message 2
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | WTB: Rear Rt Side XP Window |
Looking to find a new or used right side rear trianglar curved & tinted
rear cockpit window replacement--Thx
Message 3
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Does anyone have the Aircraft Spruce or Lockwood part numberfor the mot
or mounts on the Pulsar XP? The Aero Designs partnumber is AD307.Thank
you. Dan Elkins N96DE Pulsar XP Kit #378
____________________________________________________________
Extended Stay America
Get Fantastic Amenities, low rates! Kitchen, Ample Workspace, Free WIFI
http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3141/5220f9eb76a5c79eb7b6fst04vuc
Message 4
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Lockwood number for the yellow banded medium berry mount is 22001-12.- Th
ey do make harder and softer mounts but I have settle on the medium.=0A-
=0AHope that helps,=0ABill Coleman=0A =0A=0A_______________________________
_=0A From: "dlelkins@juno.com" <dlelkins@juno.com>=0ATo: =0ASent: Friday, A
ugust 30, 2013 3:59 PM=0ASubject: Pulsar-List: =0A =0A=0A=0ADoes- anyone
have the Aircraft Spruce or Lockwood part number=0Afor the motor mounts on
the Pulsar XP?--The Aero Designs part=0Anumber is AD307.=0AThank you.
=0A=0A=0ADan Elkins-N96DE- Pulsar XP Kit #378 =0A- =0A=0A____________
________________________________________________=0AExtended Stay America=0A
Get Fantastic Amenities, low rates! Kitchen, Ample Workspace, Free WIFI=0Ae
=====================
Message 5
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Dan,
I replaced mine about a year ago with these - - -
http://www.aircraft-spruce.com/catalog/eppages/lordMount.php?clickkey=53
71
I was unsure which hardness to go for, but I compared the tech data for
these with the equivalent Barry mounts. I think I was leaning towards
the Medium, but AS didn't have them in stock right at the time I needed
them. Chose the Hard instead because there didn't seem to be much
difference in the characteristics from the medium Barry mount. I needed
to radius the mounting hole edges a little to get them to fit snugly, so
I suspect that the originals might have been Barry. These ones certainly
feel firmer once installed, and if I did it again I would probably go
for the Medium hardness.
Brian
On 31/08/2013, at 7:59 AM, "dlelkins@juno.com" <dlelkins@juno.com>
wrote:
> Does anyone have the Aircraft Spruce or Lockwood part number
> for the motor mounts on the Pulsar XP? The Aero Designs part
> number is AD307.
> Thank you.
>
>
> Dan Elkins N96DE Pulsar XP Kit #378
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> Extended Stay America
> Get Fantastic Amenities, low rates! Kitchen, Ample Workspace, Free
WIFI
> extendedstayamerica.com
>
>
>
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|