Pulsar-List Digest Archive

Mon 04/15/19


Total Messages Posted: 6



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 08:53 AM - Re: Please Make a Contribution to Support Your Lists... (Matt Dralle)
     2. 10:51 AM - Pulsar Spar Fitting (Yellowhammer)
     3. 11:31 AM - Re: Pulsar Spar Fitting (Jim Fillman)
     4. 12:49 PM - Re: Pulsar Spar Fitting (Dennis Adams)
     5. 01:22 PM - Re: Pulsar Spar Fitting (Sonja Englert)
     6. 03:16 PM - Re: Pulsar Spar Fitting (Davi Weaver)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:53:54 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Please Make a Contribution to Support Your Lists...
    From: "Matt Dralle" <dralle@matronics.com>
    Yellowhammer wrote: > To Whom should the contribution be sent to and what is the preferable method of payment? > > Clyde http://www.matronics.com/contribution Thank you! Matt Dralle List Admin -------- Matt Dralle Matronics Email List Administrator Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=488745#488745


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:51:46 AM PST US
    Subject: Pulsar Spar Fitting
    From: "Yellowhammer" <coyler@sthpk-12.net>
    Pulsar Builders/Owners, I have an issue that is quite perplexing to me. It involves the placement the spars. After dry fitting the spars it has come to my attention the they will not be aligned correctly. How on earth can a person join the two spars per the manual's instructions and one of them not be out of alignment? The Spars, as you all well know, are in the shapes of a reversed C, smooth side is the forward side, The plans call for the spars to overlap. How can there not be a miss aligned wing spar using this method? I'm sure I am missing something here but I just don't understand the methodology behind this. The measurement from the front of the leading edge at the wing root to each forward cut out line and the spar slot measures at 12 inches for both starboard and port. Given that the spars are manufactured in the shape of a reverse C and they are to overlap one another, wouldn't this cause a misalignment?? ANY clarification on this task will b more than appreciated. If I need to provide a drawing or picture I can do so. Thanks again, Clyde -------- J.M. Oyler &quot;Clyde&quot; Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=488748#488748


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:31:58 AM PST US
    From: "Jim Fillman" <pilot623@gmail.com>
    Subject: Pulsar Spar Fitting
    I think the wings are staggered by the amount of spar stagger. -----Original Message----- From: owner-pulsar-list-server@matronics.com <owner-pulsar-list-server@matronics.com> On Behalf Of Yellowhammer Sent: Monday, April 15, 2019 12:51 PM Subject: Pulsar-List: Pulsar Spar Fitting Pulsar Builders/Owners, I have an issue that is quite perplexing to me. It involves the placement the spars. After dry fitting the spars it has come to my attention the they will not be aligned correctly. How on earth can a person join the two spars per the manual's instructions and one of them not be out of alignment? The Spars, as you all well know, are in the shapes of a reversed C, smooth side is the forward side, The plans call for the spars to overlap. How can there not be a miss aligned wing spar using this method? I'm sure I am missing something here but I just don't understand the methodology behind this. The measurement from the front of the leading edge at the wing root to each forward cut out line and the spar slot measures at 12 inches for both starboard and port. Given that the spars are manufactured in the shape of a reverse C and they are to overlap one another, wouldn't this cause a misalignment?? ANY clarification on this task will b more than appreciated. If I need to provide a drawing or picture I can do so. Thanks again, Clyde -------- J.M. Oyler &quot;Clyde&quot; Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=488748#488748


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:49:12 PM PST US
    From: Dennis Adams <ghf4986@gmail.com>
    Subject: Re: Pulsar Spar Fitting
    Be sure to check the pitch of one wing compared to the other wing before installing. I seem to remember needing 7 lawyers of tape to bring them into alignment. Dennis Adams N375CM Sent from an IPad On Apr 15, 2019, at 12:00 PM, Jim Fillman <pilot623@gmail.com> wrote: I think the wings are staggered by the amount of spar stagger. -----Original Message----- From: owner-pulsar-list-server@matronics.com <owner-pulsar-list-server@matronics.com> On Behalf Of Yellowhammer Sent: Monday, April 15, 2019 12:51 PM Subject: Pulsar-List: Pulsar Spar Fitting Pulsar Builders/Owners, I have an issue that is quite perplexing to me. It involves the placement the spars. After dry fitting the spars it has come to my attention the they will not be aligned correctly. How on earth can a person join the two spars per the manual's instructions and one of them not be out of alignment? The Spars, as you all well know, are in the shapes of a reversed C, smooth side is the forward side, The plans call for the spars to overlap. How can there not be a miss aligned wing spar using this method? I'm sure I am missing something here but I just don't understand the methodology behind this. The measurement from the front of the leading edge at the wing root to each forward cut out line and the spar slot measures at 12 inches for both starboard and port. Given that the spars are manufactured in the shape of a reverse C and they are to overlap one another, wouldn't this cause a misalignment?? ANY clarification on this task will b more than appreciated. If I need to provide a drawing or picture I can do so. Thanks again, Clyde -------- J.M. Oyler &quot;Clyde&quot; Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=488748#488748


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:22:21 PM PST US
    From: Sonja Englert <paqs345@gmail.com>
    Subject: Re: Pulsar Spar Fitting
    One wing is further forward than the other by the width of the spar (intentionally). Sonja On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 10:54 AM Yellowhammer <coyler@sthpk-12.net> wrote: > > Pulsar Builders/Owners, > > I have an issue that is quite perplexing to me. It involves the placement > the spars. > > After dry fitting the spars it has come to my attention the they will not > be aligned correctly. > > How on earth can a person join the two spars per the manual's instructions > and one of them not be out of alignment? > > The Spars, as you all well know, are in the shapes of a reversed C, smooth > side is the forward side, The plans call for the spars to overlap. How can > there not be a miss aligned wing spar using this method? > > I'm sure I am missing something here but I just don't understand the > methodology behind this. > > The measurement from the front of the leading edge at the wing root to > each > forward cut out line and the spar slot measures at 12 inches for both > starboard and port. > > Given that the spars are manufactured in the shape of a reverse C and they > are to overlap one another, wouldn't this cause a misalignment?? > > ANY clarification on this task will b more than appreciated. > > If I need to provide a drawing or picture I can do so. > > Thanks again, > Clyde > > -------- > J.M. Oyler &quot;Clyde&quot; > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=488748#488748 > >


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:16:20 PM PST US
    From: Davi Weaver <mortweaver@sbcglobal.net>
    Subject: Re: Pulsar Spar Fitting
    You will also probably find that the lower left aft fuselage wing fillet doe s not match up with the lower aft wing surface. The difference may be as mu ch as 1/4 inch or more due to a mold error. I resolved that issue on my XP b y cutting out an area of the lower fuselage approximately 3 X 4 inches and r e glassing it to match the adjacent wing structure (not critical load bering structure). Dave Weaver Sent from my iPhone > On Apr 15, 2019, at 3:21 PM, Sonja Englert <paqs345@gmail.com> wrote: > > One wing is further forward than the other by the width of the spar (inten tionally). > Sonja > >> On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 10:54 AM Yellowhammer <coyler@sthpk-12.net> wrote : >> >> Pulsar Builders/Owners, >> >> I have an issue that is quite perplexing to me. It involves the placement the spars. >> >> After dry fitting the spars it has come to my attention the they will not be aligned correctly. >> >> How on earth can a person join the two spars per the manual's instruction s and one of them not be out of alignment? >> >> The Spars, as you all well know, are in the shapes of a reversed C, smoot h side is the forward side, The plans call for the spars to overlap. How can there not be a miss aligned wing spar using this method? >> >> I'm sure I am missing something here but I just don't understand the meth odology behind this. >> >> The measurement from the front of the leading edge at the wing root to ea ch >> forward cut out line and the spar slot measures at 12 inches for both st arboard and port. >> >> Given that the spars are manufactured in the shape of a reverse C and the y are to overlap one another, wouldn't this cause a misalignment?? >> >> ANY clarification on this task will b more than appreciated. >> >> If I need to provide a drawing or picture I can do so. >> >> Thanks again, >> Clyde >> >> -------- >> J.M. Oyler &quot;Clyde&quot; >> >> >> >> >> Read this topic online here: >> >> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=488748#488748 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ========== >> ar-List" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Na vigator?Pulsar-List >> ========== >> FORUMS - >> eferrer" target="_blank">http://forums.matronics.com >> ========== >> WIKI - >> errer" target="_blank">http://wiki.matronics.com >> ========== >> b Site - >> -Matt Dralle, List Admin. >> rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contributio n >> ========== >> >> >>




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   pulsar-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/Pulsar-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/pulsar-list
  • Browse Pulsar-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/pulsar-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --