RV10-List Digest Archive

Thu 04/10/08


Total Messages Posted: 18



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 04:32 AM - Doors coming off (Russell Daves)
     2. 05:13 AM - Re: RV10-List Digest: 60 Msgs - 04/09/08 (Wayne Hadath)
     3. 05:35 AM - Re: Doors coming off (David McNeill)
     4. 07:27 AM - Re: Doors coming off (John W. Cox)
     5. 07:37 AM - Re: Doors coming off (Tim Olson)
     6. 08:08 AM - Re: Doors coming off (Tim Olson)
     7. 08:30 AM - Door Fixes (Jim McLaughlin)
     8. 09:26 AM - Re: Engine Special (Jeff Carpenter)
     9. 03:07 PM - Re: Engine stop tests. (Rick Sked)
    10. 03:12 PM - Door closing (Rick Sked)
    11. 03:41 PM - Re: Engine Special (tomhanaway)
    12. 03:54 PM - Re: Door closing (David McNeill)
    13. 04:24 PM - Re: Re: Engine Special (Pascal)
    14. 05:06 PM - Re: Doors coming off (gary)
    15. 05:09 PM - Re: Re: Engine Special (MauleDriver)
    16. 05:18 PM - Price Reduced: RV-10 Project For Sale (Eric Parlow)
    17. 05:42 PM - Re: Door closing (John Dunne)
    18. 06:49 PM - Re: Doors coming off (Rick Sked)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:32:28 AM PST US
    From: "Russell Daves" <dav1111@erfwireless.net>
    Subject: Doors coming off
    I have a pull down strap mounted to the front lower part of the door which hangs down about 18 inches and allows me to pull the door down for closure. I also have a door handle mounted to the rear part of the door that I can grip and pull in the rear of the door with one hand while pushing the door handle closed which I find essential in getting both the front pin and rear pin sealed. Under no circumstances would I ever consider any type of door pin that did not go all the way through the door frame. Essential to me is the ability to manually feel the door pin on the backside of the front and rear door frame to insure the pins are fully seated before I take off. Russ Daves N710RV - 200+ hours


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:13:06 AM PST US
    From: Wayne Hadath <whadath@rogers.com>
    Subject: Re: RV10-List Digest: 60 Msgs - 04/09/08
    Fellow Builders I am in the process of working on the doors and the main problem I see is that the alignment of the door is controlled by the hinge placement. In my set of hinges there was 1/32 of side play which I shimmed out. If the hinges are installed precisely then the door drops down and closes into the correct position.The only time the door is guided into position is on the last 1/4 inches of travel when the bevelled door edges come into contact with the fuselage. Now in the ideal setting which I guess would be wings off, precisely bushed and installed hinges and standing on the floor outside the aircraft while closing the door, all things work beautifully. But, in real life you will sitting inside the aircraft so there will be no visual references to help guide the door, there will be a hinges/pin mechanism that is forever wearing and causing more play (fore and aft movement of the door) and when you close the door you will be relying to a large extent on that last 1/4 inch bevel to guide the door into the correct position. I am not comfortable with relying on the last 1/4 inch. In my opinion the major mod that should be made is a method of guiding the door into it's correct position. The guide should come into play long before the last 1/4 inch. I am making my door in such a way that it is guided into the correct position and it will be impossible to throw the pins if the door is not properly seated. I believe that the latching mechanism is adequate but mods to the receiver area and to the pin ends can easily be made in any shop. Doors!!! and I thought building a canopy was a pain! Wayne Hadath F1 Rocket C-FAUH 250 hours RV 10 Fusealge top and doors. RV10-List Digest Server <rv10-list@matronics.com> wrote: * ================================================= Online Versions of Today's List Digest Archive ================================================= Today's complete RV10-List Digest can also be found in either of the two Web Links listed below. The .html file includes the Digest formatted in HTML for viewing with a web browser and features Hyperlinked Indexes and Message Navigation. The .txt file includes the plain ASCII version of the RV10-List Digest and can be viewed with a generic text editor such as Notepad or with a web browser. HTML Version: http://www.matronics.com/digest/digestview.php?Style=82701&View=html&Chapter 08-04-09&Archive=RV10 Text Version: http://www.matronics.com/digest/digestview.php?Style=82701&View=txt&Chapter 08-04-09&Archive=RV10 =============================================== EMail Version of Today's List Digest Archive =============================================== ---------------------------------------------------------- RV10-List Digest Archive --- Total Messages Posted Wed 04/09/08: 60 ---------------------------------------------------------- Today's Message Index: ---------------------- 1. 12:45 AM - ATP plug (Chris and Susie McGough) 2. 12:58 AM - Re: Re: The King has no Clothes (Steven DiNieri) 3. 01:08 AM - Re: Door handles (Steven DiNieri) 4. 03:37 AM - Re: Door handles (Bob Leffler) 5. 04:12 AM - Re: RV Grin (Bob Leffler) 6. 04:52 AM - Re: Re: NVFR avionics help (Rodger Todd) 7. 05:16 AM - Re: Re: The King has no Clothes (John Testement) 8. 05:18 AM - Re: RV Grin (gary) 9. 06:16 AM - Re: RV Grin (gary) 10. 06:44 AM - Re: P-Mag! (marcausman) 11. 06:56 AM - 2 blade Hartzell- SnF attendees (Pascal) 12. 07:05 AM - Re: Air field flow for the 10 (Bobby J. Hughes) 13. 07:42 AM - Re: NVFR avionics help (GRANSCOTT@aol.com) 14. 08:35 AM - Re: RV Grin (Deems Davis) 15. 08:49 AM - Re: Door handles (Steven DiNieri) 16. 08:54 AM - Re: Garmin 1000 additions (SteinAir, Inc.) 17. 08:58 AM - Re: Re: The King has no Clothes (Steven DiNieri) 18. 09:12 AM - Re: Engine stop tests. (Bill DeRouchey) 19. 09:26 AM - Re: Garmin 1000 additions (RV Builder (Michael Sausen)) 20. 09:46 AM - Re: Garmin 1000 additions (Tim Olson) 21. 09:49 AM - Re: Garmin 1000 additions (Tim Olson) 22. 10:07 AM - Re: Garmin 1000 additions (John W. Cox) 23. 11:24 AM - Re: Engine stop tests. (Neil & Sarah Colliver) 24. 11:43 AM - Re: Re: P-Mag! (Larry Rosen) 25. 01:04 PM - Re: Garmin 1000 additions (John Ackerman) 26. 02:59 PM - Re: Re: The King has no Clothes (Scott Schmidt) 27. 03:02 PM - Re: Garmin 1000 additions (Patrick Thyssen) 28. 03:14 PM - Engine Special (Jeff Carpenter) 29. 03:24 PM - Re: Re: The King has no Clothes (Tim Olson) 30. 03:39 PM - Re: Re: The King has no Clothes (Rene Felker) 31. 03:40 PM - Re: Re: The King has no Clothes (PJ Seipel) 32. 03:41 PM - Re: Re: The King has no Clothes () 33. 03:47 PM - Re: Garmin 1000 additions (McGANN, Ron) 34. 03:54 PM - Re: Re: The King has no Clothes (Deems Davis) 35. 04:07 PM - Re: Re: The King has no Clothes (Bob Leffler) 36. 04:51 PM - Re: Re: The King has no Clothes (Steven DiNieri) 37. 05:09 PM - Re: Garmin 1000 additions (John W. Cox) 38. 05:15 PM - Re: Re: The King has no Clothes (John W. Cox) 39. 05:24 PM - Re: Garmin 1000 additions (John W. Cox) 40. 05:48 PM - Re: AFS Systems (Rick Sked) 41. 05:59 PM - Re: Engine Special (John Cram) 42. 06:30 PM - Re: Re: The King has no Clothes (David McNeill) 43. 06:32 PM - Re: Re: The King has no Clothes (Larry Rosen) 44. 06:51 PM - Re: Re: The King has no Clothes (David McNeill) 45. 07:03 PM - Re: Re: P-Mag! (Jesse Saint) 46. 07:49 PM - Re: Engine Special (Pascal) 47. 07:54 PM - Re: Door handles (Condrey, Bob (US SSA)) 48. 07:58 PM - Doors coming off (Chris and Susie McGough) 49. 08:04 PM - Re: Re: The King has no Clothes (Rick Sked) 50. 08:14 PM - Re: Doors coming off (Tim Olson) 51. 08:26 PM - Re: Doors coming off (Ben Westfall) 52. 08:33 PM - Re: Engine stop tests. (Marcus Cooper) 53. 08:35 PM - Re: RV Grin (Marcus Cooper) 54. 08:42 PM - Re: Doors coming off (David McNeill) 55. 09:11 PM - Re: Doors coming off (John W. Cox) 56. 09:15 PM - Re: Engine stop tests. (John W. Cox) 57. 09:33 PM - Re: Doors coming off (Perry, Phil) 58. 10:36 PM - Re: Doors coming off (Kelly McMullen) 59. 10:59 PM - Re: Re: The King has no Clothes (John Ackerman) 60. 11:25 PM - Re: Doors coming off (John Dunne) ________________________________ Message 1 _____________________________________ Time: 12:45:08 AM PST US From: "Chris and Susie McGough" Subject: RV10-List: ATP plug Just recieved visors from Aviation Tech Products. Came within 10 days to Australia and answered all questions . Great service. Chris 388 ________________________________ Message 2 _____________________________________ Time: 12:58:06 AM PST US From: "Steven DiNieri" Subject: RE: RV10-List: Re: The King has no Clothes When I went to install a set in my rv10, I modified them to be much easier to install. After seeing my mods coupled with the shipping delays I was asked to reproduce a similar product by a few builders. I think they are a very good anchor for the door rods to latch into, and should add a margin of strength to the latch mech. I do offer them on my website (available immediately ;) sorry for the commercial announcement, I just want all to know there are options... Steve dinieri Iflyrv10.com > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com > [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of AirMike > Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 12:59 AM > To: rv10-list@matronics.com > Subject: RV10-List: Re: The King has no Clothes > > > I cannot imagine why anyone flying an RV10 does not install > the very excellent Rivethead door pins. They are tedious to > install and adjust, but they are really sweet and center the > closure on the door giving a positive feel when closing your > door plus the whole install feels very strong > > -------- > OSH '08 or Bust > Q/B Kit - Ready to exit cabin top/door purgatory > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=175658#175658 > > > > > > > > Photoshare, and much much more: > > > ________________________________ Message 3 _____________________________________ Time: 01:08:32 AM PST US From: "Steven DiNieri" Subject: RE: RV10-List: Door handles Michael, i have been offering a handle kit similar to the Hendricks, but in a complete kit form, thinner in profile, specifically designed for the rv10. My design allows the latching system to remain in place as vans designed. when i started designing the handles the primary idea was to leave all the door latch mech alone. my handles simply replace the outside handle, just in a different position. they also allow standard lock cylinders for locking (just like the Hendricks) and i am introducing on the website this week a flush stainless lock system for all rv10's. easily installed into even flying aircraft. sorry to toot my own horn, but with all the talk about door and latches and the importance of such systems i just want all to know there are options... Steven dinieri iflyrv10.com _____ From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of RV Builder (Michael Sausen) Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2008 9:33 AM Subject: RV10-List: Door handles With all the talk about the doors I've been doing some thinking regarding the factory setup vs the aftermarket handles. I like the flush look and operation of the handles like Hendricks and others but the lack of a positive locking detent really makes me nervous. I also want a way to lock the doors so they can't be opened by any passerby. The is especially important with the TSA rumblings that all GA aircraft must have locked doors. It's not a law yet but I wouldn't be surprised to see it conceded to stop something bigger. Frankly having the kind of investment in these aircraft that we do it's a bit silly to not have the doors locked somehow. I know, if a thief really wants in he will get in. But a thief also isn't going to stop at a plane with locks if a better target is around or if it will take too long or be too noticeable to circumvent them. So to that end someone had posted a while back a way to make a baggage door lock work with the standard Van's door handles. Anyone still have the links to that? Michael ________________________________ Message 4 _____________________________________ Time: 03:37:57 AM PST US From: "Bob Leffler" Subject: RE: RV10-List: Door handles Steven, I see that you've added many new products to your site. The elevator trim bracket and the aluminum door guides caught my eye. Are you reselling Rivethead-Aero's product or are you manufacturing these yourself? Thanks, Bob From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Steven DiNieri Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 4:06 AM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Door handles Michael, i have been offering a handle kit similar to the Hendricks, but in a complete kit form, thinner in profile, specifically designed for the rv10. My design allows the latching system to remain in place as vans designed. when i started designing the handles the primary idea was to leave all the door latch mech alone. my handles simply replace the outside handle, just in a different position. they also allow standard lock cylinders for locking (just like the Hendricks) and i am introducing on the website this week a flush stainless lock system for all rv10's. easily installed into even flying aircraft. sorry to toot my own horn, but with all the talk about door and latches and the importance of such systems i just want all to know there are options... Steven dinieri iflyrv10.com ________________________________ Message 5 _____________________________________ Time: 04:12:40 AM PST US From: "Bob Leffler" Subject: RE: RV10-List: RV Grin Great news Gary! I'm looking forward to seeing you, Brenda, and both your RVs this summer. My wife is definitely coming and is anxious to meet all the RV-10 spouses. Please let us know how your Phase I goes. See ya in 109 days! bob From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of gary Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2008 8:07 PM Subject: RV10-List: RV Grin N204GS flew for the first time today. I have been telling folks that it would be done on Tuesday ever since I started building. The airplane flew perfectly. Gary 40274 ________________________________ Message 6 _____________________________________ Time: 04:52:06 AM PST US From: Rodger Todd Subject: Re: RV10-List: Re: NVFR avionics help Hi Chris, You'll need to replace (or add to) the SL-40 with an SL-30 which will give you a TSO'd VOR/LOC/GS. To this you will have to add an MD200 series CDI to maintain the TSO. Why don't you contact Jake (can't find his e-mail address at the moment) to confirm that you don't need anything else avionics wise? Also why noit try the Oz RV Yahoo group site? Looking forward to hearing about the first flight - Spring is in the air! Rodger --- On Wed, 9/4/08, Chris and Susie McGough wrote: > From: Chris and Susie McGough > Subject: Re: RV10-List: Re: NVFR avionics help > To: rv10-list@matronics.com > Date: Wednesday, 9 April, 2008, 8:13 AM > McGough" > > Mike ....my 10 is just about ready to fly and as per email > you can see my > current setup and wanted to go from there. > > thanks anyway regards Chris > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "AirMike" > To: > Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 3:39 PM > Subject: RV10-List: Re: NVFR avionics help > > > "AirMike" > > > > Obviously you are going through the time consuming > process of panel > > planning. After beating around the bush for 2 months, > I went with the SL30 > > as most of the threads here also indicate. I tried for > a long time to save > > the extra two thousand plus dollars on the SL40 (radio > only). I finally > > realized that it was false economy. Yes(Ron) you do > need the additional > > CDI and Glide slope lights. The AFS3500 has (built in) > the CDI indicators > > for guidance but you also need an audio panel for the > Marker Beacon > > lights. Yes that is another $1000. My panel is being > finished by the very > > nice folks at Aerotronics in Billings, MT. While I > have not yet received > > the panel, I am very impressed with the excellent > customer interaction and > > pro-active approach that Aerotronic takes. I got three > bids on my panel, > > but went with them on my intuition and the advice of a > member of the EAA > > advisory panel. I will give another report after I P/U > the panel later > > this month. This is my thinking that this a a ! > > serous NVFR panel and will get me out of trouble if > caught in IFR > > conditions. It seem to be a very cost effective setup. > Probably could save > > more with Dynon > > > > AFS3500 (1x) > > Garmin SL30 Nav/Com > > Garmin 327 Mode "C" Transponder > > Garmin 340 Audio > > Garmin 496 > > Digiflight II VS > > Trutrak B/U ADI Backup 2.25" > > UMA Altimeter Backup 2.25" > > UMA A/S Backup 2.25" > > Xaon XRX TCAS Beta (talks to 496) > > PAI Vertical Card compass > > > > -------- > > OSH '08 or Bust > > Q/B Kit - Ready to exit cabin top/door purgatory > > > > > > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > > > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=175661#175661 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ___________________________________________________________ Yahoo! For Good helps you make a difference http://uk.promotions.yahoo.com/forgood/ ________________________________ Message 7 _____________________________________ Time: 05:16:30 AM PST US From: "John Testement" Subject: RE: RV10-List: Re: The King has no Clothes Steve, How much for a set? John Testement jwt@roadmapscoaching.com 40321 Richmond, VA Painting do not archive -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Steven DiNieri Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 3:55 AM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Re: The King has no Clothes When I went to install a set in my rv10, I modified them to be much easier to install. After seeing my mods coupled with the shipping delays I was asked to reproduce a similar product by a few builders. I think they are a very good anchor for the door rods to latch into, and should add a margin of strength to the latch mech. I do offer them on my website (available immediately ;) sorry for the commercial announcement, I just want all to know there are options... Steve dinieri Iflyrv10.com > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com > [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of AirMike > Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 12:59 AM > To: rv10-list@matronics.com > Subject: RV10-List: Re: The King has no Clothes > > > I cannot imagine why anyone flying an RV10 does not install the very > excellent Rivethead door pins. They are tedious to install and adjust, > but they are really sweet and center the closure on the door giving a > positive feel when closing your door plus the whole install feels very > strong > > -------- > OSH '08 or Bust > Q/B Kit - Ready to exit cabin top/door purgatory > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=175658#175658 > > > > > > > > Photoshare, and much much more: > > > Checked by AVG. 7:10 AM Checked by AVG. 7:10 AM ________________________________ Message 8 _____________________________________ Time: 05:18:16 AM PST US From: "gary" Subject: RE: RV10-List: RV Grin Like all builders, I need to tackle the honey-do list. I have been lax in that area. Gary _____ From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Jesse Saint Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2008 10:48 PM Subject: Re: RV10-List: RV Grin Congratulations Gary! That's fantastic news. Now, since you like building so much, what is the next project going to be? :-) do not archive Jesse Saint Saint Aviation, Inc. jesse@saintaviation.com Cell: 352-427-0285 Fax: 815-377-3694 On Apr 8, 2008, at 7:07 PM, gary wrote: N204GS flew for the first time today. I have been telling folks that it would be done on Tuesday ever since I started building. The airplane flew perfectly. Gary 40274 ________________________________ Message 9 _____________________________________ Time: 06:16:35 AM PST US From: "gary" Subject: RE: RV10-List: RV Grin Unlike Deems I am not a very good documenter of my work, but here are a few pix. Gary 40274 _____ From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of John Testement Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2008 11:07 PM Subject: RE: RV10-List: RV Grin Congratulations Gary - let's see some more pix. John Testement jwt@roadmapscoaching.com 40321 Richmond, VA Painting do not archive _____ From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of gary Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2008 8:07 PM Subject: RV10-List: RV Grin N204GS flew for the first time today. I have been telling folks that it would be done on Tuesday ever since I started building. The airplane flew perfectly. Gary 40274 4/8/2008 7:30 AM Checked by AVG. 4/8/2008 7:30 AM ________________________________ Message 10 ____________________________________ Time: 06:44:10 AM PST US Subject: RV10-List: Re: P-Mag! From: "marcausman" I've had them for about 320 hours on my RV-7. Early on I had two failures and a third (which was my fault, you have to be very careful making the ignition wires). So I replaced one with a slick mag. The difference between the slick mag and the p-mag are very obvious when running the engine on only one mag (for testing, run-up etc.). Along the way, Brad and Tom were very helpful. More importantly, though, the last 160 hours or so have been flawless. So I can only deduce that they've worked out the bugs, at least based on my experience. If and when I build an RV-10 I'll put them on for sure. -------- Marc Ausman http://www.verticalpower.com RV-7 IO-390 Flying Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=175686#175686 ________________________________ Message 11 ____________________________________ Time: 06:56:46 AM PST US From: "Pascal" Subject: RV10-List: 2 blade Hartzell- SnF attendees SnF Attendees; http://www.hartzellprop.com/pressroom/pr_htm/pr_11_09_07.htm Could someone walk over to Hartzell and ask if the 2 blade Carbon blade would be a good option for the RV-10? If so what would be needed to get one? I am thinking although it's for the Diamond DA40 now, Hartzell may provide it for other aircraft as well. Since the three blade is in the Cirrus this blade may very well work for us. Thanks! Pascal ________________________________ Message 12 ____________________________________ Time: 07:05:09 AM PST US Subject: RE: RV10-List: Air field flow for the 10 From: "Bobby J. Hughes" Bob, RV6 pressure plot attached. The pressure areas on our 10's should be very similar if your using the stock cowl. The pressure does change depending on angle of attack. Here is another good site with lots of pressure data. Different airframe but the basic principles apply. http://www.melmoth2.com/ === message truncated ==


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:35:26 AM PST US
    From: "David McNeill" <dlm46007@cox.net>
    Subject: Doors coming off
    As an addition to the standard setup I am going to use a steel set screw from Mcmaster Carr to thread inside the aluminum tube to cover the area of the tube carrying the shear load. I do agree that rear door handle will greatly assist in pulling in the door so that the pins insert correctly. _____ From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Russell Daves Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 4:25 AM Subject: RV10-List: Doors coming off I have a pull down strap mounted to the front lower part of the door which hangs down about 18 inches and allows me to pull the door down for closure. I also have a door handle mounted to the rear part of the door that I can grip and pull in the rear of the door with one hand while pushing the door handle closed which I find essential in getting both the front pin and rear pin sealed. Under no circumstances would I ever consider any type of door pin that did not go all the way through the door frame. Essential to me is the ability to manually feel the door pin on the backside of the front and rear door frame to insure the pins are fully seated before I take off. Russ Daves N710RV - 200+ hours


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:27:57 AM PST US
    Subject: Doors coming off
    From: "John W. Cox" <johnwcox@pacificnw.com>
    I'm sure they will say Yes. Check any lockset or latchset for the logic of tapered pins on any door of a residential or commercial building. The only exception I can think of is an armory or bank vault door. I still stand my the logic for the taper to go opposite the plan. Oh yeh, and the pins to be fully retracted before a closure attempt. Just think of a deadbolt doing damage if not retracted. John C ________________________________ From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of John Dunne Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 11:23 PM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Doors coming off Isn't the idea of the taper to the outside, to ensure capture of the block and thereafter apply a leverage to firmly pull the door closed and into alignment? John 40315 ________________________________ From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of John W. Cox Sent: Thursday, 10 April 2008 2:08 PM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Doors coming off The original prototype door on N410RV incurred damage during a x-cnty airshow trip to Colorado. As I remember the canopy and door assemblies off N220RV were removed as a quick fix and integral completed "total unit" as a Second Iteration prototype build and used to repair N410RV. All of the early kits going back to Randy s/n 006 and John Nys s/n 047 were the 220RV Gen II type. I believe 416EC s/n 416 was still this same type. Since then, several improvements (alternations have been included) aftermarket which is the thrill of this group, the open discussion, the talent of the individuals and the desire to pursue excellence in build. Tim did an excellent explanation on the Taper. I am opposed to what I believe is in the plans (that should be nothing new to anyone). The Strike plate idea is a corrective measure for the high likelihood that operators will try to close a door with the aft pin partially extended. My review of the 416EC pictures shows an alignment and strike issue with the Pilot's plate. I believe that other than in Tim's "safety locked" scenario this system might allow an opening or movement at a critical point in time. The Rack systems should not allow continued retraction of an engaged pin during flight. I believe the taper needs to be oriented to the interior never the exterior. I believe the pin needs to be "fully" engaged into the metal door pillar. I believe the UMHD is not adequate for a long term receptacle. The view of 416EC showed significant stress forces on the mounting hardware. I believe a handhold which pulls the door down and closed positively even with a door ajar "in-flight" is a wise design change. Within this body of personal opinion are several quality improvements which need universal illumination. For those with the second generation door & latch (220RV). I would like to see 416EC the last RV-10 to ever suffer latch release and premature door departure in flight. Pilots are human, mistakes happen, the door handle might not always get "safety latched" and remain so. The secondary latch on the leading edge or a boldly relocated hinge set like on Cirrus can sure get the discussion stirred. Let's keep the sharp eyes focused at SNF and less mud on the field. There is lots to learn. Think Safety, Fly Safe. John C. ________________________________ From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Ben Westfall Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 8:24 PM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Doors coming off Vans did have an issue with a door early on with 410RV. I don't know the specifics but I think John C might. Hopefully he will chime in. I don't know if the door came off or not but they did have a door related issue. I think it was while going to/from Osh or some other eastern states flyin. Ben Westfall ________________________________ From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Chris and Susie McGough Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 7:56 PM Subject: RV10-List: Doors coming off Guys are we 100% sure that the doors that have come off were latched corectly where they go into the fuse frames. Are we sure that the door handles were closed properly and in the locked position? . Remember the tunnel heat problem, some have the problem but most do not. I would think Vans 10 would have close to 1000 hours on it , why has the door not come off?? Does someone live close to Vans that can have a look and maybe do some measuring ? I am absolutely not saying there is no problem just need some facts I have written to Vans to the engieering department to see what they say regards Chris http://www.matronics.com/contribution - The RV10-List Email Forum - Thank you for your generous support! --> http://www.matronics.com/contribution


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:37:57 AM PST US
    From: Tim Olson <Tim@MyRV10.com>
    Subject: Re: Doors coming off
    It's interesting that this thread is sticking around so long this time...that's good, it breeds awareness. First, in regards to the problem, those (I've read this a.m.'s posts already) who are saying that the issue is an alignment issue, are correct. The problem is, the door handle is forward on the door, and when you pull in to close it, the front of the door pulls in, but the back doesn't pull in as far. So, then you go to latch it, and the back pin hits the nylon block or the door frame. Thinner door seals might help. I can't say I'm unhappy with the ones that came with the kit though, because they seal very well...never had a plane with such well sealed doors. But, yes, with thinner seals this issue could be helped a bit. One of the big improvements would be to have a pull handle centered on the door, or a secondary pull handle on the aft part of the door. The problem there is that, while I'm a chunky monkey, I'm still under 40, and yet it isn't super easy to twist around with the seat in the way, to pull a handle in. So you're still going to have to take care. In short, this problem exists because of the way you pull the door shut, and requires that you pull it shut nicely before you try to engage the pins. To me, if you still have all of the OTHER components left the same, you're still going to have a hard time regardless of if you use the rivethead pins or the standard, because you NEED to get the alignment good before you try to latch, or the pins hit the block and you get a nasty noise. This is NOT a dig on them, because I see benefits to their system. But, the video that was originally put out, where they dropped the door in place and latched it, is a little misleading, because if you have nice tightly sealed door seals, latching it won't be as easy as pictured. I'd love to fly in a plane with alternative door seals to see how tight they seal, and then perhaps I'd consider them, but I am thus far happy with the standard ones because of the sealing. John A, thanks for your description of the installation. Very much appreciated. I'm still not 100% comfortable with having the threaded area anywhere near the spot that if cracked, would cause the major failure, but at least it gives me a little more comfort. Ideally, to me, those pins would be very long and done before you build the door completely. But, I would have a harder time installing those anyway. John C, I appreciate your discomfort with the taper, but really, I think the pins at least need a bullet nose to aid in centering. The taper is probably overkill, but I don't think an opposite taper would do any more than cause more damage...a bullet tip is probably the ideal. Certainly, without the taper I have now, given the standard install, I would not have had good luck with an opposite taper...I would have even worse paint chip issues. Wayne H, You're right on with the reasons...good job. Now, a couple other topics.... 1) RE: front hinges. Not a bad concept. But, I think it would be much harder to design a robust strong and light door with strong enough hinges, and you'd have to be really careful when the door sags or you could crack it. Better? From a door flying off standpoint, sure, but it definitely would require more care, and a totally overall stronger design, more expense, and all that. So I can see why Van's opted for what they did. 2) Re: Closing Doors. Personally, other than my wife, I try never to ALLOW anyone else to close and latch my doors. On one of my earlier flights, a co-worker reached up, grabbed the door, and SLAM! Slammed it down...thinking it was auto latching like a car door. That sent shivers down my spine, so after that I decided to inconvenience my passengers and insist on me latching it. Also, one of the nice things I did during the build was go real slow in trimming that drip edge on the sides of the door. What this did for me is make the side gap almost NOTHING if the door is closed tightly. So, in my plane, it's ABSOLUTELY visible by a quick glance if you have the door in the proper position to latch, and it's closed tight. If the pin is out of the hole, you'd have a HUGE gap. So yeah, some really sloppy door checks are what caused the door departures. 3) Latching: The latching mechanism itself I'm plenty happy with. If someone wanted to add a secondary latch, fine, not a bad idea for the most part. Ideally I'd rather see a vertical pin in the door bottom as a 3rd latch point, that latches along automatically with the other points. But, as I said before, if you have a positive "click" latching system, and you latch it right, you should be good to go. For what it's worth, once mine is latched, I don't detect any for/aft or other movement. They're just tight. The latching is positive and I have zero worries of a properly latched door being released because of the handle being pulled. Whatever you do, try to use your utmost craftsmanship when you do the door latches. From time to time I see RV-10's where you can tell they didn't take the care on some of the glass-related items. But the doors, try to do a great job at least on the latches. Tim Olson - RV-10 N104CD - Flying John W. Cox wrote: > The original prototype door on N410RV incurred damage during a x-cnty > airshow trip to Colorado. As I remember the canopy and door assemblies > off N220RV were removed as a quick fix and integral completed total > unit as a Second Iteration prototype build and used to repair N410RV. > All of the early kits going back to Randy s/n 006 and John Nys s/n 047 > were the 220RV Gen II type. I believe 416EC s/n 416 was still this > same type. Since then, several improvements (alternations have been > included) aftermarket which is the thrill of this group, the open > discussion, the talent of the individuals and the desire to pursue > excellence in build. > > > > Tim did an excellent explanation on the Taper. I am opposed to what I > believe is in the plans (that should be nothing new to anyone). The > Strike plate idea is a corrective measure for the high likelihood that > operators will try to close a door with the aft pin partially extended. > My review of the 416EC pictures shows an alignment and strike issue > with the Pilots plate. I believe that other than in Tims safety > locked scenario this system might allow an opening or movement at a > critical point in time. The Rack systems should not allow continued > retraction of an engaged pin during flight. I believe the taper needs > to be oriented to the interior never the exterior. I believe the pin > needs to be fully engaged into the metal door pillar. I believe the > UMHD is not adequate for a long term receptacle. The view of 416EC > showed significant stress forces on the mounting hardware. I believe a > handhold which pulls the door down and closed positively even with a > door ajar in-flight is a wise design change. > > > > Within this body of personal opinion are several quality improvements > which need universal illumination. For those with the second > generation door & latch (220RV). I would like to see 416EC the last > RV-10 to ever suffer latch release and premature door departure in flight. > > > > Pilots are human, mistakes happen, the door handle might not always get > safety latched and remain so. The secondary latch on the leading edge > or a boldly relocated hinge set like on Cirrus can sure get the > discussion stirred. > > > > Lets keep the sharp eyes focused at SNF and less mud on the field. > There is lots to learn. Think Safety, Fly Safe. > >


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:08:48 AM PST US
    From: Tim Olson <Tim@MyRV10.com>
    Subject: Re: Doors coming off
    I don't see the point, in a plane. yeah, I get your point on an auto-latching house door latch....you HAVE to have the taper inward to push in the latch when you close it. So sure, there it makes perfect sense. On the RV-10, the taper helps correct slight misalignment and bring the door tighter....that's not a bad thing. I think a bullet tip is even better, but you're never going to be able to pull the door TOO far in, so the taper on the inside of the pin will never assist you in doing anything. So I guess we disagree here. The taper itself isn't an, or THE issue....the issue is you NEED to have plenty of pin sticking through the door frame...and you would want at least some of the pin captured by the frame to NOT have a taper on it, so you have the full strength of a complete round section of tubing. If it weren't for the fact that the alignment would suck, a square cut tubing piece would work ok too...and would probably be ideal. A solid round rod, like a dead bolt. So I guess I don't think the taper is something to make an issue of, other than to keep it fairly short so you have plenty of length of full-strength tubing. Tim Olson - RV-10 N104CD - Flying do not archive John W. Cox wrote: > Im sure they will say Yes. Check any lockset or latchset for the logic > of tapered pins on any door of a residential or commercial building. > The only exception I can think of is an armory or bank vault door. I > still stand my the logic for the taper to go opposite the plan. Oh yeh, > and the pins to be fully retracted before a closure attempt. Just think > of a deadbolt doing damage if not retracted. > > > > John C >


    Message 7


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:30:58 AM PST US
    From: Jim McLaughlin <jimm@mweltd.com>
    Subject: Door Fixes
    I remember my first instructor lecturing me (30+ years ago) about not getti ng rattled if a door opens in flight because it is just noisy and an inconv enience. In over 2500+ hrs in taildraggers to twins, both exp. and certif ied, I have experienced at least half a dozen inflight doors openings. Som e were my fault, some mechanical and one just a passenger waking up from a nap and opening the door in the process of stretching out. The point is that doors open in flight multiple times every day with out in cident. No matter how good the latch is designed, at some point it is like ly that the door will come unlatched in flight. Think about the wear issue when the airframe times get into the multiple thousand hours. While I am partial to retract landing gear, I know the insurance rates show that gear up landings are a given. There are several warning systems around that see m to have no effect on the accident rate and no one has figured out a mecha nical way to eliminate the problem. There are plenty of possible failures that can cause serious damage or worse, a door unlatch should not be one of them. On the 10, this problem is compounded by the fact the door lacks th e stiffness to stay shut if only one pin is not in. The failure of the top latch in Pipers is routine, but is not even worth stopping for. I think we need a help from Vans to come up with a solution that really sol ves the whole problem. If I had not already spent so much time building an d fitting the doors, I might have just attached the pilot side door permane ntly and cut the risk in half. I am truly a Vans fan am looking forward to flying SN 40154. Airplanes are fairly complex and every one of them has s omething that gets changed or improved. RV-10 doors are not as serious as Bonanza V tails (one of my favorites), which ultimately turned out to be a cheap and easy fix. It took a long time and the lives of several people be fore Beech could admit the problem and send out the fix. Sorry for rambling Jim McLaughlin 40154.


    Message 8


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:26:35 AM PST US
    From: Jeff Carpenter <jeff@westcottpress.com>
    Subject: Re: Engine Special
    The current word is that Vans has sold out the four engines and three more. Lycoming has allowed Vans to keep taking orders at that price... I have no idea how much longer it will last. On Apr 9, 2008, at 7:46 PM, Pascal wrote: > Main page on bottom (scroll down) > http://www.vansaircraft.com/images/open/Lyc-snf.jpg > ----- Original Message ----- > From: John Cram > To: rv10-list@matronics.com > Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 5:56 PM > Subject: Re: RV10-List: Engine Special > > where did u find these one the site > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Jeff Carpenter > To: rv10-list@matronics.com > Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 6:11 PM > Subject: RV10-List: Engine Special > > <jeff@westcottpress.com> > > Vans has a nice discount on three (was four, but I just bought one) > XIO-540-D4A5 engines just posted on the website. > > On your marks... get set... go! > > Jeff nbsp; Navigator Photoshare, and title=http:// > www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List href="http:// > www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List">http:// > www.matronic via the Web title=http:// > forums.matronics.com/ href="http://forums.matronics.com">http:// > forums.matronics.com > > > href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List">http:// > www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List > href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com > href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http:// > www.matronics.com/c > >


    Message 9


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:07:24 PM PST US
    From: Rick Sked <ricksked@embarqmail.com>
    Subject: Re: Engine stop tests.
    I may be mistaken but I beleive that you need 1700+ RPM to get the prop to change pitch, in any direction, regardless of the oil pressure. I understoo d the govenor needed the 1700 rpm to function and=C2-allow the oil pressu re to vary the pitch. Rick Sked 40185 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Marcus Cooper" <coop85@cableone.net> Sent: Wednesday, April 9, 2008 8:31:00 PM (GMT-0800) America/Los_Angeles Subject: RE: RV10-List: Engine stop tests. Bill, =C2-=C2-=C2- This info is based on my understanding of the props, if I=99m off base someone please chime in.=C2- Doesn=99t that ma ke you feel confident about what I=99m about to write ;) The non-reversing constant speed props (like on the -10) are designed to go flat pitch in the event of a loss of oil pressure.=C2- The main concern is if you have to execute a go-around or steep climb you want the high RPM available for performance. =C2-=C2- I think what you are experiencing is simply increased thrust by going more coarse on the pitch while there=99s still oil pressure.=C2- Once th e prop stops I seriously doubt there is a significant difference in drag be tween flat and coarse pitch.=C2- =C2-So first, I don=99t think yo u can control the pitch as the engine quits and second I don=99t thin k it would make a difference. Marcus From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@m atronics.com] On Behalf Of Bill DeRouchey Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 11:10 AM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Engine stop tests. Something that=C2-I was playing with (experimenting is too strong a word) =C2-is when the engine dies (in my case idling)=C2-and is still turning =C2-- if you pull the prop out the RV10 takes a leap forward. Does the gl ide range increase with the prop all the way out? Is this in fact the stand ard emergency procedure with a constant speed prop? It seems that the engine turning would power the oil pump and could turn th e blades to full coarse decreasing the drag. Any comments? My previous=C2-constant speed prop experience was just suff icient to get my high performance signoff. Bill DeRouchey N939SB, flying "John W. Cox" <johnwcox@pacificnw.com> wrote: Fabulous detail and invaluable research. We need more of this stuff and less accident reporting. By the way, did you go with the stock James engine cowl? The Warbirds acts as breathtaking as the setting at Wanaka. See you for OSH '08. John -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Neil & Sarah Colliver Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2008 10:48 AM Subject: RV10-List: Engine stop tests. Hi I would like to report on some tests we did this evening. We wanted to know what would happen when the engine stops. In flight! We have a Barratts IO540, standard compression, with the MT 3 blade prop, dual mags. The object of the exercise was to see just what happens when the fuel runs out in one tank, and how easy it is to re-start. First exercise was to practise some forced landings in case we really couldn't restart it. So complete with clearance from our local Airforce base, and with one of their squadron leaders in the right hand seat, the tower fully briefed on what we were doing, off we set to 5000ft. There was a relatively strong wind of about 35 knots at 2000ft & 25 gusting 30 on the ground . So we came up a bit short (just a bit) on the runway. I was reminded then that I need to practice forced landings from all heights, not just pattern (or circuit) height. Then it was back up to 5000ft. Cool the engine a bit, then ( all in controlled airspace I hasten to add), we cut mixture to full idle cut off. The engine just kept on going at about 500 rpm in the glide at about 80 knots or so, so eventually with full flap, and mushing down at about 55 knots, we managed to finally get it to stop. It's certainly odd seeing the prop stopped, and the ground so far below. Yes we do know that it is less than ideal for the prop to drive the engine, but we wanted to do the tests. There is no doubt that if the engine stops, the glide rate is about 200 ft/m better with the prop in full course. So it was full rich, full fine, and about 1/2 inch. Fuel pump on, a flick of the starter and away it went. So no problems there at all. The next test was a bit harder, because we wanted to check if we could start the engine without the starter (just in case of a flat battery / broken starter etc.) I've had two occasions where the engine started, but the starter failed in the process. So I was unable to restart. With the prop stopped again, we went flaps up, full rich,full fine, 1/2 inch on the throttle and entered a dive. The prop looked as if someone was trying to hand swing it (though at 4500ft and rapidly decreasing, that was unlikely!) After a few seconds it finally passed TDC, then again, and eventually it did restart after having lost about 2600ft, and at a speed of about 130-150 knots. Very quickly it builds up revs, so pulling back on stick & throttle we were quickly under control. But it is not something you will get away with under 3000ft. Our final test was to deliberately run out of fuel. With plenty in the other tank! So we simply cruised around for a further 15 mins or so, until finally the engine cooughed & spluttered. There was plenty of time to switch pump on and change tanks and away she went. So no dramas at all. Having completed our tests it was back up to 7000ft t play on the overcast for a short while. So in conclusion, there is nothing to be feared about running a tank dry. So long as the starter works, or you have sufficient height. However, if you have totally run out of fuel, it will happily continue to turn. So bearing in mind =C2- =C2- http://www.matronics.com/Navigato r?RV10-List http://forums.matronics.com http://www.matronics.com/contributi ============= ==== ======================= ==


    Message 10


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:12:50 PM PST US
    From: Rick Sked <ricksked@embarqmail.com>
    Subject: Door closing
    Wayne, I'm not so sure it's slop in the hinge, the door just twists or flexes too easily. Now maybe a set of guide pins that engage the door sill, pointing s traight into the cabin from the outside may be a good option. With close to lerance's this would stop forward and aft movement of the door and align it in the correct position for latching as long as the door was completely cl osed and flush. Rick Sked 40185 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Wayne Hadath" <whadath@rogers.com> Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 5:10:16 AM (GMT-0800) America/Los_Angeles Subject: RV10-List: Re: RV10-List Digest: 60 Msgs - 04/09/08 Fellow Builders I am in the process of=C2-working on the doors and the=C2-main problem I see is that the alignment of the door is controlled by the hinge placemen t. In my set of hinges there was 1/32 of side play which I shimmed out. If the hinges are installed=C2-precisely=C2-then the door drops down and c loses into the correct position.The only time the door is guided into posit ion is on the last 1/4 inches of travel when the bevelled door edges come i nto contact with the fuselage. Now in the ideal setting which I guess would be wings off, precisely bushed and installed hinges and standing on the fl oor outside the aircraft while closing the door, all things work beautifull y. But, in real life you will sitting inside the aircraft so there will be no visual references to help guide the door, there will be a hinges/pin mec hanism that is forever wearing and causing more play (fore and aft movement of the door) and when you close the door you will be relying to a large ex tent on that last 1/4 inch bevel to guide the door into the correct positio n. I am not comfortable with relying on the last 1/4 inch. In my opinion th e major mod that should be made is a method of guiding the door into it's c orrect position. The guide should come into play long before the last 1/4 i nch.=C2-I am making my door in such a way that it is guided into the corr ect position and it will be impossible to throw the pins if the door is not properly seated. I believe=C2- that the latching =C2-mechanism is adeq uate but mods to the receiver area and to the pin ends can easily be made i n any shop. Doors!!! and I thought building a canopy was a pain! Wayne Hadath F1 Rocket C-FAUH 250 hours RV 10 Fusealge top and doors. RV10-List Digest Server <rv10-list@matronics.com> wrote: * Online Versions of Today's List Digest Archive Today's complete RV10-List Digest can also be found in either of the two Web Links listed below. The .html file includes the Digest formatted in HTML for viewing with a web browser and features Hyperlinked Indexes and Message Navigation. The .txt file includes the plain ASCII version of the RV10-List Digest and can be viewed with a generic text editor such as Notepad or with a web browser. HTML Version: http://www.matronics.com/digest/digestview.php?Style=82701&View=html&Ch apter 08-04-09&Archive=RV10 Text Version: http://www.matronics.com/digest/digestview.php?Style=82701&View=txt&Cha pter 08-04-09&Archive=RV10 ======================= EMail Version of Today's List Digest Archive ======================= ---------------------------------------------------------- RV10-List Digest Archive --- Total Messages Posted Wed 04/09/08: 60 ---------------------------------------------------------- Today's Message Index: ---------------------- 1. 12:45 AM - ATP plug (Chris and Susie McGough) 2. 12:58 AM - Re: Re: The King has no Clothes (Steven DiNieri) 3. 01:08 AM - Re: Door handles (Steven DiNieri) 4. 03:37 AM - Re: Door handles (Bob Leffler) 5. 04:12 AM - Re: RV Grin (Bob Leffler) 6. 04:52 AM - Re: Re: NVFR avionics help (Rodger Todd) 7. 05:16 AM - Re: Re: The King has no Clothes (John Testement) 8. 05:18 AM - Re: RV Grin (gary) 9. 06:16 AM - Re: RV Grin (gary) 10. 06:44 AM - Re: P-Mag! (marcausman) 11. 06:56 AM - 2 blade Hartzell- SnF attendees (Pascal) 12. 07:05 AM - Re: Air field flow for the 10 (Bobby J. Hughes) 13. 07:42 AM - Re: NVFR avionics help (GRANSCOTT@aol.com) 14. 08:35 AM - Re: RV Grin (Deems Davis) 15. 08:49 AM - Re: Door handles (Steven DiNieri) 16. 08:54 AM - Re: Garmin 1000 additions (SteinAir, Inc.) 17. 08:58 AM - Re: Re: The King has no Clothes (Steven DiNieri) 18. 09:12 AM - Re: Engine stop tests. (Bill DeRouchey) 19. 09:26 AM - Re: Garmin 1000 additions (RV Builder (Michael Sausen)) 20. 09:46 AM - Re: Garmin 1000 additions (Tim Olson) 21. 09:49 AM - Re: Garmin 1000 additions (Tim Olson) 22. 10:07 AM - Re: Garmin 1000 additions (John W. Cox) 23. 11:24 AM - Re: Engine stop tests. (Neil & Sarah Colliver) 24. 11:43 AM - Re: Re: P-Mag! (Larry Rosen) 25. 01:04 PM - Re: Garmin 1000 additions (John Ackerman) 26. 02:59 PM - Re: Re: The King has no Clothes (Scott Schmidt) 27. 03:02 PM - Re: Garmin 1000 additions (Patrick Thyssen) 28. 03:14 PM - Engine Special (Jeff Carpenter) 29. 03:24 PM - Re: Re: The King has no Clothes (Tim Olson) 30. 03:39 PM - Re: Re: The King has no Clothes (Rene Felker) 31. 03:40 PM - Re: Re: The King has no Clothes (PJ Seipel) 32. 03:41 PM - Re: Re: The King has no Clothes () 33. 03:47 PM - Re: Garmin 1000 additions (McGANN, Ron) 34. 03:54 PM - Re: Re: The King has no Clothes (Deems Davis) 35. 04:07 PM - Re: Re: The King has no Clothes (Bob Leffler) 36. 04:51 PM - Re: Re: The King has no Clothes (Steven DiNieri) 37. 05:09 PM - Re: Garmin 1000 additions (John W. Cox) 38. 05:15 PM - Re: Re: The King has no Clothes (John W. Cox) 39. 05:24 PM - Re: Garmin 1000 additions (John W. Cox) 40. 05:48 PM - Re: AFS Systems (Rick Sked) 41. 05:59 PM - Re: Engine Special (John Cram) 42. 06:30 PM - Re: Re: The King has no Clothes (David McNeill) 43. 06:32 PM - Re: Re: The King has no Clothes (Larry Rosen) 44. 06:51 PM - Re: Re: The King has no Clothes (David McNeill) 45. 07:03 PM - Re: Re: P-Mag! (Jesse Saint) 46. 07:49 PM - Re: Engine Special (Pascal) 47. 07:54 PM - Re: Door handles (Condrey, Bob (US SSA)) 48. 07:58 PM - Doors coming off (Chris and Susie McGough) 49. 08:04 PM - Re: Re: The King has no Clothes (Rick Sked) 50. 08:14 PM - Re: Doors coming off (Tim Olson) 51. 08:26 PM - Re: Doors coming off (Ben Westfall) 52. 08:33 PM - Re: Engine stop tests. (Marcus Cooper) 53. 08:35 PM - Re: RV Grin (Marcus Cooper) 54. 08:42 PM - Re: Doors coming off (David McNeill) 55. 09:11 PM - Re: Doors coming off (John W. Cox) 56. 09:15 PM - Re: Engine stop tests. (John W. Cox) 57. 09:33 PM - Re: Doors coming off (Perry, Phil) 58. 10:36 PM - Re: Doors coming off (Kelly McMullen) 59. 10:59 PM - Re: Re: The King has no Clothes (John Ackerman) 60. 11:25 PM - Re: Doors coming off (John Dunne) ________________________________ Message 1 ________________________________ _____ Time: 12:45:08 AM PST US From: "Chris and Susie McGough" Subject: RV10-List: ATP plug Just recieved visors from Aviation Tech Products. Came within 10 days to Australia and answered all questions . Great service. Chris 388 ________________________________ Message 2 ________________________________ _____ Time: 12:58:06 AM PST US From: "Steven DiNieri" Subject: RE: RV10-List: Re: The King has no Clothes When I went to install a set in my rv10, I modified them to be much easier to install. After seeing my mods coupled with the shipping delays I was asked to reproduce a similar product by a few builders. I think they are a very good anchor for the door rods to latch into, and should add a margin o f strength to the latch mech. I do offer them on my website (available immediately ;) sorry for the commercial announcement, I just want all to know there are options... Steve dinieri Iflyrv10.com > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com > [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of AirMike > Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 12:59 AM > To: rv10-list@matronics.com > Subject: RV10-List: Re: The King has no Clothes > > > I cannot imagine why anyone flying an RV10 does not install > the very excellent Rivethead door pins. They are tedious to > install and adjust, but they are really sweet and center the > closure on the door giving a positive feel when closing your > door plus the whole install feels very strong > > -------- > OSH '08 or Bust > Q/B Kit - Ready to exit cabin top/door purgatory > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=175658#175658 > > > > > > > > Photoshare, and much much more: > > > ________________________________ Message 3 ________________________________ _____ Time: 01:08:32 AM PST US From: "Steven DiNieri" Subject: RE: RV10-List: Door handles Michael, i have been offering a handle kit similar to the Hendricks, but in a complete kit form, thinner in profile, specifically designed for the rv10 . My design allows the latching system to remain in place as vans designed. when i started designing the handles the primary idea was to leave all the door latch mech alone. my handles simply replace the outside handle, just i n a different position. they also allow standard lock cylinders for locking (just like the Hendricks) and i am introducing on the website this week a flush stainless lock system for all rv10's. easily installed into even flying aircraft. sorry to toot my own horn, but with all the talk about door and latches and the importance of such systems i just want all to know there are options... Steven dinieri iflyrv10.com _____ From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of RV Builder (Michael Sausen) Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2008 9:33 AM Subject: RV10-List: Door handles With all the talk about the doors I've been doing some thinking regarding the factory setup vs the aftermarket handles. I like the flush look and operation of the handles like Hendricks and others but the lack of a positive locking detent really makes me nervous. I also want a way to lock the doors so they can't be opened by any passerby. The is especially important with the TSA rumblings that all GA aircraft must have locked doors. It's not a law yet but I wouldn't be surprised to see it conceded to stop something bigger. Frankly having the kind of investment in these aircraft that we do it's a bit silly to not hav e the doors locked somehow. I know, if a thief really wants in he will get in. But a thief also isn't going to stop at a plane with locks if a better target is around or if it will take too long or be too noticeable to circumvent them. So to that end someone had posted a while back a way to make a baggage door lock work with the standard Van's door handles. Anyone still have the links to that? Michael ________________________________ Message 4 ________________________________ _____ Time: 03:37:57 AM PST US From: "Bob Leffler" Subject: RE: RV10-List: Door handles Steven, I see that you've added many new products to your site. The elevator trim bracket and the aluminum door guides caught my eye. Are you reselling Rivethead-Aero's product or are you manufacturing these yourself? Thanks, Bob From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Steven DiNieri Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 4:06 AM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Door handles Michael, i have been offering a handle kit similar to the Hendricks, but in a complete kit form, thinner in profile, specifically designed for the rv10 . My design allows the latching system to remain in place as vans designed. when i started designing the handles the primary idea was to leave all the door latch mech alone. my handles simply replace the outside handle, just i n a different position. they also allow standard lock cylinders for locking (just like the Hendricks) and i am introducing on the website this week a flush stainless lock system for all rv10's. easily installed into even flying aircraft. sorry to toot my own horn, but with all the talk about door and latches and the importance of such systems i just want all to know there are options... Steven dinieri iflyrv10.com ________________________________ Message 5 ________________________________ _____ Time: 04:12:40 AM PST US From: "Bob Leffler" Subject: RE: RV10-List: RV Grin Great news Gary! I'm looking forward to seeing you, Brenda, and both your RVs this summer. My wife is definitely coming and is anxious to meet all the RV-10 spouses. Please let us know how your Phase I goes. See ya in 109 days! bob From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of gary Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2008 8:07 PM Subject: RV10-List: RV Grin N204GS flew for the first time today. I have been telling folks that it would be done on Tuesday ever since I started building. The airplane flew perfectly. Gary 40274 ________________________________ Message 6 ________________________________ _____ Time: 04:52:06 AM PST US From: Rodger Todd Subject: Re: RV10-List: Re: NVFR avionics help Hi Chris, You'll need to replace (or add to) the SL-40 with an SL-30 which will give you a TSO'd VOR/LOC/GS. To this you will have to add an MD200 series CDI to mai ntain the TSO. Why don't you contact Jake (can't find his e-mail address at the moment) to confirm that you don't need anything else avionics wise? Also why noit try the Oz RV Yahoo group site? Looking forward to hearing about the first flight - Spring is in the air! Rodger --- On Wed, 9/4/08, Chris and Susie McGough wrote: > From: Chris and Susie McGough > Subject: Re: RV10-List: Re: NVFR avionics help > To: rv10-list@matronics.com > Date: Wednesday, 9 April, 2008, 8:13 AM > McGough" > > Mike ....my 10 is just about ready to fly and as per email > you can see my > current setup and wanted to go from there. > > thanks anyway regards Chris > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "AirMike" > To: > Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 3:39 PM > Subject: RV10-List: Re: NVFR avionics help > > > "AirMike" > > > > Obviously you are going through the time consuming > process of panel > > planning. After beating around the bush for 2 months, > I went with the SL30 > > as most of the threads here also indicate. I tried for > a long time to save > > the extra two thousand plus dollars on the SL40 (radio > only). I finally > > realized that it was false economy. Yes(Ron) you do > need the additional > > CDI and Glide slope lights. The AFS3500 has (built in) > the CDI indicators > > for guidance but you also need an audio panel for the > Marker Beacon > > lights. Yes that is another $1000. My panel is being > finished by the very > > nice folks at Aerotronics in Billings, MT. While I > have not yet received > > the panel, I am very impressed with the excellent > customer interaction and > > pro-active approach that Aerotronic takes. I got three > bids on my panel, > > but went with them on my intuition and the advice of a > member of the EAA > > advisory panel. I will give another report after I P/U > the panel later > > this month. This is my thinking that this a a ! > > serous NVFR panel and will get me out of trouble if > caught in IFR > > conditions. It seem to be a very cost effective setup. > Probably could save > > more with Dynon > > > > AFS3500 (1x) > > Garmin SL30 Nav/Com > > Garmin 327 Mode "C" Transponder > > Garmin 340 Audio > > Garmin 496 > > Digiflight II VS > > Trutrak B/U ADI Backup 2.25" > > UMA Altimeter Backup 2.25" > > UMA A/S Backup 2.25" > > Xaon XRX TCAS Beta (talks to 496) > > PAI Vertical Card compass > > > > -------- > > OSH '08 or Bust > > Q/B Kit - Ready to exit cabin top/door purgatory > > > > > > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > > > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=175661#175661 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ___________________________________________________________ Yahoo! For Good helps you make a difference http://uk.promotions.yahoo.com/forgood/ ________________________________ Message 7 ________________________________ _____ Time: 05:16:30 AM PST US From: "John Testement" Subject: RE: RV10-List: Re: The King has no Clothes Steve, How much for a set? John Testement jwt@roadmapscoaching.com 40321 Richmond, VA Painting do not archive -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Steven DiNieri Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 3:55 AM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Re: The King has no Clothes When I went to install a set in my rv10, I modified them to be much easier to install. After seeing my mods coupled with the shipping delays I was asked to reproduce a similar product by a few builders. I think they are a very good anchor for the door rods to latch into, and should add a margin o f strength to the latch mech. I do offer them on my website (available immediately ;) sorry for the commercial announcement, I just want all to know there are options... Steve dinieri Iflyrv10.com > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com > [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of AirMike > Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 12:59 AM > To: rv10-list@matronics.com > Subject: RV10-List: Re: The King has no Clothes > > > I cannot imagine why anyone flying an RV10 does not install the very > excellent Rivethead door pins. They are tedious to install and adjust, > but they are really sweet and center the closure on the door giving a > positive feel when closing your door plus the whole install feels very > strong > > -------- > OSH '08 or Bust > Q/B Kit - Ready to exit cabin top/door purgatory > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=175658#175658 > > > > > > > > Photoshare, and much much more: > > > Checked by AVG. 7:10 AM Checked by AVG. 7:10 AM ________________________________ Message 8 ________________________________ _____ Time: 05:18:16 AM PST US From: "gary" Subject: RE: RV10-List: RV Grin Like all builders, I need to tackle the honey-do list. I have been lax in that area. Gary _____ From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Jesse Saint Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2008 10:48 PM Subject: Re: RV10-List: RV Grin Congratulations Gary! That's fantastic news. Now, since you like building so much, what is the next project going to be? :-) do not archive Jesse Saint Saint Aviation, Inc. jesse@saintaviation.com Cell: 352-427-0285 Fax: 815-377-3694 On Apr 8, 2008, at 7:07 PM, gary wrote: N204GS flew for the first time today. I have been telling folks that it would be done on Tuesday ever since I started building. The airplane flew perfectly. Gary 40274 ________________________________ Message 9 ________________________________ _____ Time: 06:16:35 AM PST US From: "gary" Subject: RE: RV10-List: RV Grin Unlike Deems I am not a very good documenter of my work, but here are a few pix. Gary 40274 _____ From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of John Testement Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2008 11:07 PM Subject: RE: RV10-List: RV Grin Congratulations Gary - let's see some more pix. John Testement jwt@roadmapscoaching.com 40321 Richmond, VA Painting do not archive _____ From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of gary Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2008 8:07 PM Subject: RV10-List: RV Grin N204GS flew for the first time today. I have been telling folks that it would be done on Tuesday ever since I started building. The airplane flew perfectly. Gary 40274 4/8/2008 7:30 AM Checked by AVG. 4/8/2008 7:30 AM ________________________________ Message 10 _______________________________ _____ Time: 06:44:10 AM PST US Subject: RV10-List: Re: P-Mag! From: "marcausman" I've had them for about 320 hours on my RV-7. Early on I had two failures a nd a third (which was my fault, you have to be very careful making the ignition wires). So I replaced one with a slick mag. The difference between the slick mag and the p-mag are very obvious when running the engine on only one mag (for testing, run-up etc.). Along the way, Brad and Tom were very helpful. More importantly, though, the last 160 hours or so have been flawless. So I can only deduce that they've worked out the bugs, at least based on my experien ce. If and when I build an RV-10 I'll put them on for sure. -------- Marc Ausman http://www.verticalpower.com RV-7 IO-390 Flying Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=175686#175686 ________________________________ Message 11 _______________________________ _____ Time: 06:56:46 AM PST US From: "Pascal" Subject: RV10-List: 2 blade Hartzell- SnF attendees SnF Attendees; http://www.hartzellprop.com/pressroom/pr_htm/pr_11_09_07.htm Could someone walk over to Hartzell and ask if the 2 blade Carbon blade would be a good option for the RV-10? If so what would be needed to get one? I am thinking although it's for the Diamond DA40 now, Hartzell may provide it for other aircraft as well. Since the three blade is in the Cirrus this blade may very well work for us. Thanks! Pascal ________________________________ Message 12 _______________________________ _____ Time: 07:05:09 AM PST US Subject: RE: RV10-List: Air field flow for the 10 From: "Bobby J. Hughes" Bob, RV6 pressure plot attached. The pressure areas on our 10's should be very similar if your using the stock cowl. The pressure does change depending on angle of attack. Here is another good site with lots of pressure data. Different airframe but the basic principles apply. http://www.melmoth2.com/ === message truncated === ==== ======================= ===


    Message 11


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:41:39 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Engine Special
    From: "tomhanaway" <tomhanaway@comcast.net>
    I bought one this morning. Van's staff advised that Lycoming was making more available. I emailed my forms to Van's, called in a credit card deposit and got the three blade MT prop as part of the package. Wonderful timing as I arrived at Sun and Fun today fully intending to buy a Mattituck at $39,200 less $600 show special. Van's price included shipping and took another $1000 off for the prop bundle. So today was a great day under the theory that I didn't spend as much as Iwas thinking I'd have to. Now,..... on to avionics with all the saved money. Tom H. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=176009#176009


    Message 12


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:54:54 PM PST US
    From: "David McNeill" <dlm46007@cox.net>
    Subject: Door closing
    Another thing to look for on the front pins is the length of the bevel. Van's precut bevel is the same for both front and rear. The front bevel effectively requires an insertion of about .75" just to have a full diameter of tube in the door jamb . I am going to remake the front pins using a new set of rear pins cut to size for the front with a much shorter bevel. In addition since there is already a tapped tube I will insert a 5/16" stainless steel set screw with an allen wrench to a depth where the portion of the tube which penetrates the door jamb will be solid aluminum and steel. Also in case anyone is wondering, I contacted the NTSB and verbally confirmed that for both 410MR and 210HM both doors were at the crash site. _____ From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Rick Sked Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 3:10 PM Subject: RV10-List: Door closing Wayne, I'm not so sure it's slop in the hinge, the door just twists or flexes too easily. Now maybe a set of guide pins that engage the door sill, pointing straight into the cabin from the outside may be a good option. With close tolerance's this would stop forward and aft movement of the door and align it in the correct position for latching as long as the door was completely closed and flush. Rick Sked 40185 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Wayne Hadath" <whadath@rogers.com> Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 5:10:16 AM (GMT-0800) America/Los_Angeles Subject: RV10-List: Re: RV10-List Digest: 60 Msgs - 04/09/08 Fellow Builders I am in the process of working on the doors and the main problem I see is that the alignment of the door is controlled by the hinge placement. In my set of hinges there was 1/32 of side play which I shimmed out. If the hinges are installed precisely then the door drops down and closes into the correct position.The only time the door is guided into position is on the last 1/4 inches of travel when the bevelled door edges come into contact with the fuselage. Now in the ideal setting which I guess would be wings off, precisely bushed and installed hinges and standing on the floor outside the aircraft while closing the door, all things work beautifully. But, in real life you will sitting inside the aircraft so there will be no visual references to help guide the door, there will be a hinges/pin mechanism that is forever wearing and causing more play (fore and aft movement of the door) and when you close the door you will be relying to a large extent on that last 1/4 inch bevel to guide the door into the correct position. I am not comfortable with relying on the last 1/4 inch. In my opinion the major mod that should be made is a method of guiding the door into it's correct position. The guide should come into play long before the last 1/4 inch. I am making my door in such a way that it is guided into the correct position and it will be impossible to throw the pins if the door is not properly seated. I believe that the latching mechanism is adequate but mods to the receiver area and to the pin ends can easily be made in any shop. Doors!!! and I thought building a canopy was a pain! Wayne Hadath F1 Rocket C-FAUH 250 hours RV 10 Fusealge top and doors. RV10-List Digest Server <rv10-list@matronics.com> wrote: * ======================== Online Versions of Today's List Digest Archive ======================== Today's complete RV10-List Digest can also be found in either of the two Web Links listed below. The .html file includes the Digest formatted in HTML for viewing with a web browser and features Hyperlinked Indexes and Message Navigation. The .txt file includes the plain ASCII version of the RV10-List Digest and can be viewed with a generic text editor such as Notepad or with a web browser. HTML Version: http://www.matronics.com/digest/digestview.php?Style=82701&View=html&Chapter 08-04-09&Archive=RV10 Text Version: http://www.matronics.com/digest/digestview.php?Style=82701&View=txt&Chapter 2008-04-09&Archive=RV10 ====================== EMail Version of Today's List Digest Archive ====================== ---------------------------------------------------------- RV10-List Digest Archive --- Total Messages Posted Wed 04/09/08: 60 ---------------------------------------------------------- Today's Message Index: ---------------------- 1. 12:45 AM - ATP plug (Chris and Susie McGough) 2. 12:58 AM - Re: Re: The King has no Clothes (Steven DiNieri) 3. 01:08 AM - Re: Door handles (Steven DiNieri) 4. 03:37 AM - Re: Door handles (Bob Leffler) 5. 04:12 AM - Re: RV Grin (Bob Leffler) 6. 04:52 AM - Re: Re: NVFR avionics help (Rodger Todd) 7. 05:16 AM - Re: Re: The King has no Clothes (John Testement) 8. 05:18 AM - Re: RV Grin (gary) 9. 06:16 AM - Re: RV Grin (gary) 10. 06:44 AM - Re: P-Mag! (marcausman) 11. 06:56 AM - 2 blade Hartzell- SnF attendees (Pascal) 12. 07:05 AM - Re: Air field flow for the 10 (Bobby J. Hughes) 13. 07:42 AM - Re: NVFR avionics help (GRANSCOTT@aol.com) 14. 08:35 AM - Re: RV Grin (Deems Davis) 15. 08:49 AM - Re: Door handles (Steven DiNieri) 16. 08:54 AM - Re: Garmin 1000 additions (SteinAir, Inc.) 17. 08:58 AM - Re: Re: The King has no Clothes (Steven DiNieri) 18. 09:12 AM - Re: Engine stop tests. (Bill DeRouchey) 19. 09:26 AM - Re: Garmin 1000 additions (RV Builder (Michael Sausen)) 20. 09:46 AM - Re: Garmin 1000 additions (Tim Olson) 21. 09:49 AM - Re: Garmin 1000 additions (Tim Olson) 22. 10:07 AM - Re: Garmin 1000 additions (John W. Cox) 23. 11:24 AM - Re: Engine stop tests. (Neil & Sarah Colliver) 24. 11:43 AM - Re: Re: P-Mag! (Larry Rosen) 25. 01:04 PM - Re: Garmin 1000 additions (John Ackerman) 26. 02:59 PM - Re: Re: The King has no Clothes (Scott Schmidt) 27. 03:02 PM - Re: Garmin 1000 additions (Patrick Thyssen) 28. 03:14 PM - Engine Special (Jeff Carpenter) 29. 03:24 PM - Re: Re: The King has no Clothes (Tim Olson) 30. 03:39 PM - Re: Re: The King has no Clothes (Rene Felker) 31. 03:40 PM - Re: Re: The King has no Clothes (PJ Seipel) 32. 03:41 PM - Re: Re: The King has no Clothes () 33. 03:47 PM - Re: Garmin 1000 additions (McGANN, Ron) 34. 03:54 PM - Re: Re: The King has no Clothes (Deems Davis) 35. 04:07 PM - Re: Re: The King has no Clothes (Bob Leffler) 36. 04:51 PM - Re: Re: The King has no Clothes (Steven DiNieri) 37. 05:09 PM - Re: Garmin 1000 additions (John W. Cox) 38. 05:15 PM - Re: Re: The King has no Clothes (John W. Cox) 39. 05:24 PM - Re: Garmin 1000 additions (John W. Cox) 40. 05:48 PM - Re: AFS Systems (Rick Sked) 41. 05:59 PM - Re: Engine Special (John Cram) 42. 06:30 PM - Re: Re: The King has no Clothes (David McNeill) 43. 06:32 PM - Re: Re: The King has no Clothes (Larry Rosen) 44. 06:51 PM - Re: Re: The King has no Clothes (David McNeill) 45. 07:03 PM - Re: Re: P-Mag! (Jesse Saint) 46. 07:49 PM - Re: Engine Special (Pascal) 47. 07:54 PM - Re: Door handles (Condrey, Bob (US SSA)) 48. 07:58 PM - Doors coming off (Chris and Susie McGough) 49. 08:04 PM - Re: Re: The King has no Clothes (Rick Sked) 50. 08:14 PM - Re: Doors coming off (Tim Olson) 51. 08:26 PM - Re: Doors coming off (Ben Westfall) 52. 08:33 PM - Re: Engine stop tests. (Marcus Cooper) 53. 08:35 PM - Re: RV Grin (Marcus Cooper) 54. 08:42 PM - Re: Doors coming off (David McNeill) 55. 09:11 PM - Re: Doors coming off (John W. Cox) 56. 09:15 PM - Re: Engine stop tests. (John W. Cox) 57. 09:33 PM - Re: Doors coming off (Perry, Phil) 58. 10:36 PM - Re: Doors coming off (Kelly McMullen) 59. 10:59 PM - Re: Re: The King has no Clothes (John Ackerman) 60. 11:25 PM - Re: Doors coming off (John Dunne) ________________________________ Message 1 _____________________________________ Time: 12:45:08 AM PST US From: "Chris and Susie McGough" Subject: RV10-List: ATP plug Just recieved visors from Aviation Tech Products. Came within 10 days to Australia and answered all questions . Great service. Chris 388 ________________________________ Message 2 _____________________________________ Time: 12:58:06 AM PST US From: "Steven DiNieri" Subject: RE: RV10-List: Re: The King has no Clothes When I went to install a set in my rv10, I modified them to be much easier to install. After seeing my mods coupled with the shipping delays I was asked to reproduce a similar product by a few builders. I think they are a very good anchor for the door rods to latch into, and should add a margin of strength to the latch mech. I do offer them on my website (available immediately ;) sorry for the commercial announcement, I just want all to know there are options... Steve dinieri Iflyrv10.com > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com > [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of AirMike > Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 12:59 AM > To: rv10-list@matronics.com > Subject: RV10-List: Re: The King has no Clothes > > > I cannot imagine why anyone flying an RV10 does not install > the very excellent Rivethead door pins. They are tedious to > install and adjust, but they are really sweet and center the > closure on the door giving a positive feel when closing your > door plus the whole install feels very strong > > -------- > OSH '08 or Bust > Q/B Kit - Ready to exit cabin top/door purgatory > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=175658#175658 > > > > > > > > Photoshare, and much much more: > > > ________________________________ Message 3 _____________________________________ Time: 01:08:32 AM PST US From: "Steven DiNieri" Subject: RE: RV10-List: Door handles Michael, i have been offering a handle kit similar to the Hendricks, but in a complete kit form, thinner in profile, specifically designed for the rv10. My design allows the latching system to remain in place as vans designed. when i started designing the handles the primary idea was to leave all the door latch mech alone. my handles simply replace the outside handle, just in a different position. they also allow standard lock cylinders for locking (just like the Hendricks) and i am introducing on the website this week a flush stainless lock system for all rv10's. easily installed into even flying aircraft. sorry to toot my own horn, but with all the talk about door and latches and the importance of such systems i just want all to know there are options... Steven dinieri iflyrv10.com _____ From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of RV Builder (Michael Sausen) Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2008 9:33 AM Subject: RV10-List: Door handles With all the talk about the doors I've been doing some thinking regarding the factory setup vs the aftermarket handles. I like the flush look and operation of the handles like Hendricks and others but the lack of a positive locking detent really makes me nervous. I also want a way to lock the doors so they can't be opened by any passerby. The is especially important with the TSA rumblings that all GA aircraft must have locked doors. It's not a law yet but I wouldn't be surprised to see it conceded to stop something bigger. Frankly having the kind of investment in these aircraft that we do it's a bit silly to not have the doors locked somehow. I know, if a thief really wants in he will get in. But a thief also isn't going to stop at a plane with locks if a better target is around or if it will take too long or be too noticeable to circumvent them. So to that end someone had posted a while back a way to make a baggage door lock work with the standard Van's door handles. Anyone still have the links to that? Michael ________________________________ Message 4 _____________________________________ Time: 03:37:57 AM PST US From: "Bob Leffler" Subject: RE: RV10-List: Door handles Steven, I see that you've added many new products to your site. The elevator trim bracket and the aluminum door guides caught my eye. Are you reselling Rivethead-Aero's product or are you manufacturing these yourself? Thanks, Bob From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Steven DiNieri Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 4:06 AM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Door handles Michael, i have been offering a handle kit similar to the Hendricks, but in a complete kit form, thinner in profile, specifically designed for the rv10. My design allows the latching system to remain in place as vans designed. when i started designing the handles the primary idea was to leave all the door latch mech alone. my handles simply replace the outside handle, just in a different position. they also allow standard lock cylinders for locking (just like the Hendricks) and i am introducing on the website this week a flush stainless lock system for all rv10's. easily installed into even flying aircraft. sorry to toot my own horn, but with all the talk about door and latches and the importance of such systems i just want all to know there are options... Steven dinieri iflyrv10.com ________________________________ Message 5 _____________________________________ Time: 04:12:40 AM PST US From: "Bob Leffler" Subject: RE: RV10-List: RV Grin Great news Gary! I'm looking forward to seeing you, Brenda, and both your RVs this summer. My wife is definitely coming and is anxious to meet all the RV-10 spouses. Please let us know how your Phase I goes. See ya in 109 days! bob From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of gary Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2008 8:07 PM Subject: RV10-List: RV Grin N204GS flew for the first time today. I have been telling folks that it would be done on Tuesday ever since I started building. The airplane flew perfectly. Gary 40274 ________________________________ Message 6 _____________________________________ Time: 04:52:06 AM PST US From: Rodger Todd Subject: Re: RV10-List: Re: NVFR avionics help Hi Chris, You'll need to replace (or add to) the SL-40 with an SL-30 which will give you a TSO'd VOR/LOC/GS. To this you will have to add an MD200 series CDI to maintain the TSO. Why don't you contact Jake (can't find his e-mail address at the moment) to confirm that you don't need anything else avionics wise? Also why noit try the Oz RV Yahoo group site? Looking forward to hearing about the first flight - Spring is in the air! Rodger --- On Wed, 9/4/08, Chris and Susie McGough wrote: > From: Chris and Susie McGough > Subject: Re: RV10-List: Re: NVFR avionics help > To: rv10-list@matronics.com > Date: Wednesday, 9 April, 2008, 8:13 AM > McGough" > > Mike ....my 10 is just about ready to fly and as per email > you can see my > current setup and wanted to go from there. > > thanks anyway regards Chris > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "AirMike" > To: > Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 3:39 PM > Subject: RV10-List: Re: NVFR avionics help > > > "AirMike" > > > > Obviously you are going through the time consuming > process of panel > > planning. After beating around the bush for 2 months, > I went with the SL30 > > as most of the threads here also indicate. I tried for > a long time to save > > the extra two thousand plus dollars on the SL40 (radio > only). I finally > > realized that it was false economy. Yes(Ron) you do > need the additional > > CDI and Glide slope lights. The AFS3500 has (built in) > the CDI indicators > > for guidance but you also need an audio panel for the > Marker Beacon > > lights. Yes that is another $1000. My panel is being > finished by the very > > nice folks at Aerotronics in Billings, MT. While I > have not yet received > > the panel, I am very impressed with the excellent > customer interaction and > > pro-active approach that Aerotronic takes. I got three > bids on my panel, > > but went with them on my intuition and the advice of a > member of the EAA > > advisory panel. I will give another report after I P/U > the panel later > > this month. This is my thinking that this a a ! > > serous NVFR panel and will get me out of trouble if > caught in IFR > > conditions. It seem to be a very cost effective setup. > Probably could save > > more with Dynon > > > > AFS3500 (1x) > > Garmin SL30 Nav/Com > > Garmin 327 Mode "C" Transponder > > Garmin 340 Audio > > Garmin 496 > > Digiflight II VS > > Trutrak B/U ADI Backup 2.25" > > UMA Altimeter Backup 2.25" > > UMA A/S Backup 2.25" > > Xaon XRX TCAS Beta (talks to 496) > > PAI Vertical Card compass > > > > -------- > > OSH '08 or Bust > > Q/B Kit - Ready to exit cabin top/door purgatory > > > > > > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > > > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=175661#175661 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ___________________________________________________________ Yahoo! For Good helps you make a difference http://uk.promotions.yahoo.com/forgood/ ________________________________ Message 7 _____________________________________ Time: 05:16:30 AM PST US From: "John Testement" Subject: RE: RV10-List: Re: The King has no Clothes Steve, How much for a set? John Testement jwt@roadmapscoaching.com 40321 Richmond, VA Painting do not archive -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Steven DiNieri Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 3:55 AM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Re: The King has no Clothes When I went to install a set in my rv10, I modified them to be much easier to install. After seeing my mods coupled with the shipping delays I was asked to reproduce a similar product by a few builders. I think they are a very good anchor for the door rods to latch into, and should add a margin of strength to the latch mech. I do offer them on my website (available immediately ;) sorry for the commercial announcement, I just want all to know there are options... Steve dinieri Iflyrv10.com > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com > [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of AirMike > Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 12:59 AM > To: rv10-list@matronics.com > Subject: RV10-List: Re: The King has no Clothes > > > I cannot imagine why anyone flying an RV10 does not install the very > excellent Rivethead door pins. They are tedious to install and adjust, > but they are really sweet and center the closure on the door giving a > positive feel when closing your door plus the whole install feels very > strong > > -------- > OSH '08 or Bust > Q/B Kit - Ready to exit cabin top/door purgatory > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=175658#175658 > > > > > > > > Photoshare, and much much more: > > > Checked by AVG. 7:10 AM Checked by AVG. 7:10 AM ________________________________ Message 8 _____________________________________ Time: 05:18:16 AM PST US From: "gary" Subject: RE: RV10-List: RV Grin Like all builders, I need to tackle the honey-do list. I have been lax in that area. Gary _____ From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Jesse Saint Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2008 10:48 PM Subject: Re: RV10-List: RV Grin Congratulations Gary! That's fantastic news. Now, since you like building so much, what is the next project going to be? :-) do not archive Jesse Saint Saint Aviation, Inc. jesse@saintaviation.com Cell: 352-427-0285 Fax: 815-377-3694 On Apr 8, 2008, at 7:07 PM, gary wrote: N204GS flew for the first time today. I have been telling folks that it would be done on Tuesday ever since I started building. The airplane flew perfectly. Gary 40274 ________________________________ Message 9 _____________________________________ Time: 06:16:35 AM PST US From: "gary" Subject: RE: RV10-List: RV Grin Unlike Deems I am not a very good documenter of my work, but here are a few pix. Gary 40274 _____ From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of John Testement Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2008 11:07 PM Subject: RE: RV10-List: RV Grin Congratulations Gary - let's see some more pix. John Testement jwt@roadmapscoaching.com 40321 Richmond, VA Painting do not archive _____ From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of gary Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2008 8:07 PM Subject: RV10-List: RV Grin N204GS flew for the first time today. I have been telling folks that it would be done on Tuesday ever since I started building. The airplane flew perfectly. Gary 40274 4/8/2008 7:30 AM Checked by AVG. 4/8/2008 7:30 AM ________________________________ Message 10 ____________________________________ Time: 06:44:10 AM PST US Subject: RV10-List: Re: P-Mag! From: "marcausman" I've had them for about 320 hours on my RV-7. Early on I had two failures and a third (which was my fault, you have to be very careful making the ignition wires). So I replaced one with a slick mag. The difference between the slick mag and the p-mag are very obvious when running the engine on only one mag (for testing, run-up etc.). Along the way, Brad and Tom were very helpful. More importantly, though, the last 160 hours or so have been flawless. So I can only deduce that they've worked out the bugs, at least based on my experience. If and when I build an RV-10 I'll put them on for sure. -------- Marc Ausman http://www.verticalpower.com RV-7 IO-390 Flying Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=175686#175686 ________________________________ Message 11 ____________________________________ Time: 06:56:46 AM PST US From: "Pascal" Subject: RV10-List: 2 blade Hartzell- SnF attendees SnF Attendees; http://www.hartzellprop.com/pressroom/pr_htm/pr_11_09_07.htm Could someone walk over to Hartzell and ask if the 2 blade Carbon blade would be a good option for the RV-10? If so what would be needed to get one? I am thinking although it's for the Diamond DA40 now, Hartzell may provide it for other aircraft as well. Since the three blade is in the Cirrus this blade may very well work for us. Thanks! Pascal ________________________________ Message 12 ____________________________________ Time: 07:05:09 AM PST US Subject: RE: RV10-List: Air field flow for the 10 From: "Bobby J. Hughes" Bob, RV6 pressure plot attached. The pressure areas on our 10's should be very similar if your using the stock cowl. The pressure does change depending on angle of attack. Here is another good site with lots of pressure data. Different airframe but the basic principles apply. http://www.melmoth2.com/ === message truncated == get=_blank>http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List p://forums.matronics.com blank>http://www.matronics.com/contribution


    Message 13


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:24:13 PM PST US
    From: "Pascal" <rv10builder@verizon.net>
    Subject: Re: Engine Special
    so what is the difference between the YIO540 on sale and the normal XIO540 on the Van's site? Anyone know? Speaking of MT 3 blade, anyone at SnF have a chance to go over to Hartzell and ask about the two blade carbon blade yet?.. figure with Van's there it may be a great way to get the two companies talking about offering the blade to RV builders. Thx Pascal BTW- Tom- great deal you did out there I would have done the same thing if this was next year (aka Mattituck and instead saved 5K on an engine and prop) ----- Original Message ----- From: "tomhanaway" <tomhanaway@comcast.net> Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 3:38 PM Subject: RV10-List: Re: Engine Special > > I bought one this morning. Van's staff advised that Lycoming was making > more available. > I emailed my forms to Van's, called in a credit card deposit and got the > three blade MT prop as part of the package. > > Wonderful timing as I arrived at Sun and Fun today fully intending to buy > a Mattituck at $39,200 less $600 show special. > > Van's price included shipping and took another $1000 off for the prop > bundle. > > So today was a great day under the theory that I didn't spend as much as > Iwas thinking I'd have to. > > Now,..... on to avionics with all the saved money. > > Tom H. > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=176009#176009 > > >


    Message 14


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:06:24 PM PST US
    From: "gary" <speckter@comcast.net>
    Subject: Doors coming off
    How about a bungee? LOL Gary 40274 _____ From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Perry, Phil Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 12:31 AM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Doors coming off I'm starting to think of a simple and inexpensive design. Like our co-builder Mr. Leffler, I'm still a ways away from reaching this point. However I've heard of a few RV-10's with handles that allow the door to be pulled down when you're sitting in the seat. I'm thinking of making this pull down strap out of some higher strength material and actually hooking it inside the cabin to a fixed point. If it's done correctly, the handles will be functional and a open-door scenario could result in only a couple of inches worth of opening. Sure it would be a distraction if you had to fly the plane with a door that was cracked open a few inches, but it sure beats having the door remove your Horizontal Stab and tear up your airplane. It's cheap, simple, fool proof, and practical. Phil _____ From: David McNeill [mailto:dlm46007@cox.net] Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 10:40 PM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Doors coming off One other idea we had was the placement of a knob on the door inside, back near the pin. this will allow complete control (two hands pulling) of positioning the door for closure. _____ From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Ben Westfall Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 8:24 PM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Doors coming off Vans did have an issue with a door early on with 410RV. I don't know the specifics but I think John C might. Hopefully he will chime in. I don't know if the door came off or not but they did have a door related issue. I think it was while going to/from Osh or some other eastern states flyin. Ben Westfall _____ From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Chris and Susie McGough Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 7:56 PM Subject: RV10-List: Doors coming off Guys are we 100% sure that the doors that have come off were latched corectly where they go into the fuse frames. Are we sure that the door handles were closed properly and in the locked position? . Remember the tunnel heat problem, some have the problem but most do not. I would think Vans 10 would have close to 1000 hours on it , why has the door not come off?? Does someone live close to Vans that can have a look and maybe do some measuring ? I am absolutely not saying there is no problem just need some facts I have written to Vans to the engieering department to see what they say regards Chris http://www.matronics.com/contribution href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List">http://www.matronics.com /Navigator?RV10-List href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/c href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List">http://www.matronics.com /Navigator?RV10-List href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/c


    Message 15


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:09:32 PM PST US
    From: MauleDriver <MauleDriver@nc.rr.com>
    Subject: Re: Engine Special
    Yes, what is a YIO540? Pascal wrote: > > so what is the difference between the YIO540 on sale and the normal > XIO540 on the Van's site? Anyone know? > > > Speaking of MT 3 blade, anyone at SnF have a chance to go over to > Hartzell and ask about the two blade carbon blade yet?.. figure with > Van's there it may be a great way to get the two companies talking > about offering the blade to RV builders. > Thx > Pascal > > BTW- Tom- great deal you did out there I would have done the same > thing if this was next year (aka Mattituck and instead saved 5K on an > engine and prop) > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "tomhanaway" <tomhanaway@comcast.net> > To: <rv10-list@matronics.com> > Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 3:38 PM > Subject: RV10-List: Re: Engine Special > > >> >> I bought one this morning. Van's staff advised that Lycoming was >> making more available. >> I emailed my forms to Van's, called in a credit card deposit and got >> the three blade MT prop as part of the package. >> >> Wonderful timing as I arrived at Sun and Fun today fully intending to >> buy a Mattituck at $39,200 less $600 show special. >> >> Van's price included shipping and took another $1000 off for the prop >> bundle. >> >> So today was a great day under the theory that I didn't spend as much >> as Iwas thinking I'd have to. >> >> Now,..... on to avionics with all the saved money. >> >> Tom H. >> >> >> >> >> Read this topic online here: >> >> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=176009#176009 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >


    Message 16


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:18:05 PM PST US
    From: Eric Parlow <ericparlow@hotmail.com>
    Subject: Price Reduced: RV-10 Project For Sale
    RV-10 project for sale.REDUCED TO $99,900 FOR QUICK SALE! See add in Barnstormers.com and Trade-A-PlaneIncludes all materials to comp lete a flying plane except engine & prop. Full Garmin WAAS IFR instrument p ackage. GNS430W, SL30, GTX327, GI-106A, PMA800SR, LifeSaver 4300 AI, CO Mon itor, BMA EFISone w/ Autopilot and Powerboard. Rudder tim w/ position displ ay for trims and flaps. ELO Touchscreen monitor w/ switch to display EFIS o r computer to Co-pilot. All Van's kits including FWF. Accuracy Avionics ove rhead console and window trim rings. All systems installed including dual b attery Z-14 FADEC based electrical systems. CAD drawings of all system sche matics. To finish it needs: engine, prop, interior, paint, ~1000 hours labo r. Engine $39,200 (Vans)Prop $6,510 (Vans)Interior $3,182 (Flightline)Paint ~$ 8,000 (?) Total ~$56,892 to finish A flying full IFR RV-10 for $156,792! A few photos attached. ERic--(828) 777-7976Williamsport, PA panel4 (Medium).jpg Transfer 12-25-06 192 (Medium).jpg Transfer 1-30-07 048 (Small).jpg Transfer 2-5-07 033 (Small).jpg Transfer 2-5-07 034 (Small).jpg Transfer 3-27-08 120 (Small).jpg Transfer 3-27-08 121 (Small).jpg Transfer 3-27-08 131 (Small).jpg Transfer 3-27-08 134 (Small).jpg Transfer 3-27-08 138 (Small).jpg Transfer 3-27-08 146 (Small).jpg Transfer 3-27-08 150 (Small).jpg Transfer 3-27-08 170 (Small).jpg Transfer 3-27-08 194 (Small).jpg Transfer 3-27-08 207 (Small).jpg Transfer 3-27-08 213 (Small).jpg Transfer 3-27-08 214 (Small).jpg Transfer 3-27-08 217 (Small).jpg Transfer 3-27-08 221 (Small).jpg Transfer 3-27-08 223 (Small).jpg Transfer 3-27-08 224 (Small).jpg Transfer 3-27-08 226 (Small).jpg Transfer 3-27-08 228 (Small).jpg Transfer 3-27-08 229 (Small).jpg Transfer 3-27-08 230 (Small).jpg Transfer 3-27-08 231 (Small).jpg


    Message 17


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:42:00 PM PST US
    From: "John Dunne" <acs@acspropeller.com.au>
    Subject: Door closing
    I'd have to agree as far as the bevel is concerned that it is ultimately the amount of full diameter tubing that you need plenty of to ensure safely engaging the metal frame as your last line of defense. One of the reasons they can end up too short is the amount of retraction you may need to clear the cabin edge and we cut them down to suit our circumstance given correct centering and placing of the door. I disagree with John C on the taper orientation. I understand the front door scenario but I think the taper in this case is to encourage alignment. It would serve no purpose on the reverse side and wouldn't need to be there. I'd seriously consider the wisdom of an internal pin as this may well add its own problems with any leverage by the steel internal to the aluminium tubing. This leverage may be imparted at every closing or opening of the door with any sideways pressure and encourage a crack. You may be better off making the entire pin of steel. My worry with this is it may be unnecessarily strong and may inhibit you kicking out the door in any need to escape. John 40315 _____ From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of David McNeill Sent: Friday, 11 April 2008 8:51 AM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Door closing Another thing to look for on the front pins is the length of the bevel. Van's precut bevel is the same for both front and rear. The front bevel effectively requires an insertion of about .75" just to have a full diameter of tube in the door jamb . I am going to remake the front pins using a new set of rear pins cut to size for the front with a much shorter bevel. In addition since there is already a tapped tube I will insert a 5/16" stainless steel set screw with an allen wrench to a depth where the portion of the tube which penetrates the door jamb will be solid aluminum and steel. Also in case anyone is wondering, I contacted the NTSB and verbally confirmed that for both 410MR and 210HM both doors were at the crash site. _____ From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Rick Sked Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 3:10 PM Subject: RV10-List: Door closing Wayne, I'm not so sure it's slop in the hinge, the door just twists or flexes too easily. Now maybe a set of guide pins that engage the door sill, pointing straight into the cabin from the outside may be a good option. With close tolerance's this would stop forward and aft movement of the door and align it in the correct position for latching as long as the door was completely closed and flush. Rick Sked 40185 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Wayne Hadath" <whadath@rogers.com> Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 5:10:16 AM (GMT-0800) America/Los_Angeles Subject: RV10-List: Re: RV10-List Digest: 60 Msgs - 04/09/08 Fellow Builders I am in the process of working on the doors and the main problem I see is that the alignment of the door is controlled by the hinge placement. In my set of hinges there was 1/32 of side play which I shimmed out. If the hinges are installed precisely then the door drops down and closes into the correct position.The only time the door is guided into position is on the last 1/4 inches of travel when the bevelled door edges come into contact with the fuselage. Now in the ideal setting which I guess would be wings off, precisely bushed and installed hinges and standing on the floor outside the aircraft while closing the door, all things work beautifully. But, in real life you will sitting inside the aircraft so there will be no visual references to help guide the door, there will be a hinges/pin mechanism that is forever wearing and causing more play (fore and aft movement of the door) and when you close the door you will be relying to a large extent on that last 1/4 inch bevel to guide the door into the correct position. I am not comfortable with relying on the last 1/4 inch. In my opinion the major mod that should be made is a method of guiding the door into it's correct position. The guide should come into play long before the last 1/4 inch. I am making my door in such a way that it is guided into the correct position and it will be impossible to throw the pins if the door is not properly seated. I believe that the latching mechanism is adequate but mods to the receiver area and to the pin ends can easily be made in any shop. Doors!!! and I thought building a canopy was a pain! Wayne Hadath F1 Rocket C-FAUH 250 hours RV 10 Fusealge top and doors. RV10-List Digest Server <rv10-list@matronics.com> wrote: * ======================== Online Versions of Today's List Digest Archive ======================== Today's complete RV10-List Digest can also be found in either of the two Web Links listed below. The .html file includes the Digest formatted in HTML for viewing with a web browser and features Hyperlinked Indexes and Message Navigation. The .txt file includes the plain ASCII version of the RV10-List Digest and can be viewed with a generic text editor such as Notepad or with a web browser. HTML Version: http://www.matronics.com/digest/digestview.php?Style=82701&View=html&Chapter 08-04-09&Archive=RV10 Text Version: http://www.matronics.com/digest/digestview.php?Style=82701&View=txt&Chapter 2008-04-09&Archive=RV10 ====================== EMail Version of Today's List Digest Archive ====================== ---------------------------------------------------------- RV10-List Digest Archive --- Total Messages Posted Wed 04/09/08: 60 ---------------------------------------------------------- Today's Message Index: ---------------------- 1. 12:45 AM - ATP plug (Chris and Susie McGough) 2. 12:58 AM - Re: Re: The King has no Clothes (Steven DiNieri) 3. 01:08 AM - Re: Door handles (Steven DiNieri) 4. 03:37 AM - Re: Door handles (Bob Leffler) 5. 04:12 AM - Re: RV Grin (Bob Leffler) 6. 04:52 AM - Re: Re: NVFR avionics help (Rodger Todd) 7. 05:16 AM - Re: Re: The King has no Clothes (John Testement) 8. 05:18 AM - Re: RV Grin (gary) 9. 06:16 AM - Re: RV Grin (gary) 10. 06:44 AM - Re: P-Mag! (marcausman) 11. 06:56 AM - 2 blade Hartzell- SnF attendees (Pascal) 12. 07:05 AM - Re: Air field flow for the 10 (Bobby J. Hughes) 13. 07:42 AM - Re: NVFR avionics help (GRANSCOTT@aol.com) 14. 08:35 AM - Re: RV Grin (Deems Davis) 15. 08:49 AM - Re: Door handles (Steven DiNieri) 16. 08:54 AM - Re: Garmin 1000 additions (SteinAir, Inc.) 17. 08:58 AM - Re: Re: The King has no Clothes (Steven DiNieri) 18. 09:12 AM - Re: Engine stop tests. (Bill DeRouchey) 19. 09:26 AM - Re: Garmin 1000 additions (RV Builder (Michael Sausen)) 20. 09:46 AM - Re: Garmin 1000 additions (Tim Olson) 21. 09:49 AM - Re: Garmin 1000 additions (Tim Olson) 22. 10:07 AM - Re: Garmin 1000 additions (John W. Cox) 23. 11:24 AM - Re: Engine stop tests. (Neil & Sarah Colliver) 24. 11:43 AM - Re: Re: P-Mag! (Larry Rosen) 25. 01:04 PM - Re: Garmin 1000 additions (John Ackerman) 26. 02:59 PM - Re: Re: The King has no Clothes (Scott Schmidt) 27. 03:02 PM - Re: Garmin 1000 additions (Patrick Thyssen) 28. 03:14 PM - Engine Special (Jeff Carpenter) 29. 03:24 PM - Re: Re: The King has no Clothes (Tim Olson) 30. 03:39 PM - Re: Re: The King has no Clothes (Rene Felker) 31. 03:40 PM - Re: Re: The King has no Clothes (PJ Seipel) 32. 03:41 PM - Re: Re: The King has no Clothes () 33. 03:47 PM - Re: Garmin 1000 additions (McGANN, Ron) 34. 03:54 PM - Re: Re: The King has no Clothes (Deems Davis) 35. 04:07 PM - Re: Re: The King has no Clothes (Bob Leffler) 36. 04:51 PM - Re: Re: The King has no Clothes (Steven DiNieri) 37. 05:09 PM - Re: Garmin 1000 additions (John W. Cox) 38. 05:15 PM - Re: Re: The King has no Clothes (John W. Cox) 39. 05:24 PM - Re: Garmin 1000 additions (John W. Cox) 40. 05:48 PM - Re: AFS Systems (Rick Sked) 41. 05:59 PM - Re: Engine Special (John Cram) 42. 06:30 PM - Re: Re: The King has no Clothes (David McNeill) 43. 06:32 PM - Re: Re: The King has no Clothes (Larry Rosen) 44. 06:51 PM - Re: Re: The King has no Clothes (David McNeill) 45. 07:03 PM - Re: Re: P-Mag! (Jesse Saint) 46. 07:49 PM - Re: Engine Special (Pascal) 47. 07:54 PM - Re: Door handles (Condrey, Bob (US SSA)) 48. 07:58 PM - Doors coming off (Chris and Susie McGough) 49. 08:04 PM - Re: Re: The King has no Clothes (Rick Sked) 50. 08:14 PM - Re: Doors coming off (Tim Olson) 51. 08:26 PM - Re: Doors coming off (Ben Westfall) 52. 08:33 PM - Re: Engine stop tests. (Marcus Cooper) 53. 08:35 PM - Re: RV Grin (Marcus Cooper) 54. 08:42 PM - Re: Doors coming off (David McNeill) 55. 09:11 PM - Re: Doors coming off (John W. Cox) 56. 09:15 PM - Re: Engine stop tests. (John W. Cox) 57. 09:33 PM - Re: Doors coming off (Perry, Phil) 58. 10:36 PM - Re: Doors coming off (Kelly McMullen) 59. 10:59 PM - Re: Re: The King has no Clothes (John Ackerman) 60. 11:25 PM - Re: Doors coming off (John Dunne) ________________________________ Message 1 _____________________________________ Time: 12:45:08 AM PST US From: "Chris and Susie McGough" Subject: RV10-List: ATP plug Just recieved visors from Aviation Tech Products. Came within 10 days to Australia and answered all questions . Great service. Chris 388 ________________________________ Message 2 _____________________________________ Time: 12:58:06 AM PST US From: "Steven DiNieri" Subject: RE: RV10-List: Re: The King has no Clothes When I went to install a set in my rv10, I modified them to be much easier to install. After seeing my mods coupled with the shipping delays I was asked to reproduce a similar product by a few builders. I think they are a very good anchor for the door rods to latch into, and should add a margin of strength to the latch mech. I do offer them on my website (available immediately ;) sorry for the commercial announcement, I just want all to know there are options... Steve dinieri Iflyrv10.com > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com > [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of AirMike > Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 12:59 AM > To: rv10-list@matronics.com > Subject: RV10-List: Re: The King has no Clothes > > > I cannot imagine why anyone flying an RV10 does not install > the very excellent Rivethead door pins. They are tedious to > install and adjust, but they are really sweet and center the > closure on the door giving a positive feel when closing your > door plus the whole install feels very strong > > -------- > OSH '08 or Bust > Q/B Kit - Ready to exit cabin top/door purgatory > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=175658#175658 > > > > > > > > Photoshare, and much much more: > > > ________________________________ Message 3 _____________________________________ Time: 01:08:32 AM PST US From: "Steven DiNieri" Subject: RE: RV10-List: Door handles Michael, i have been offering a handle kit similar to the Hendricks, but in a complete kit form, thinner in profile, specifically designed for the rv10. My design allows the latching system to remain in place as vans designed. when i started designing the handles the primary idea was to leave all the door latch mech alone. my handles simply replace the outside handle, just in a different position. they also allow standard lock cylinders for locking (just like the Hendricks) and i am introducing on the website this week a flush stainless lock system for all rv10's. easily installed into even flying aircraft. sorry to toot my own horn, but with all the talk about door and latches and the importance of such systems i just want all to know there are options... Steven dinieri iflyrv10.com _____ From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of RV Builder (Michael Sausen) Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2008 9:33 AM Subject: RV10-List: Door handles With all the talk about the doors I've been doing some thinking regarding the factory setup vs the aftermarket handles. I like the flush look and operation of the handles like Hendricks and others but the lack of a positive locking detent really makes me nervous. I also want a way to lock the doors so they can't be opened by any passerby. The is especially important with the TSA rumblings that all GA aircraft must have locked doors. It's not a law yet but I wouldn't be surprised to see it conceded to stop something bigger. Frankly having the kind of investment in these aircraft that we do it's a bit silly to not have the doors locked somehow. I know, if a thief really wants in he will get in. But a thief also isn't going to stop at a plane with locks if a better target is around or if it will take too long or be too noticeable to circumvent them. So to that end someone had posted a while back a way to make a baggage door lock work with the standard Van's door handles. Anyone still have the links to that? Michael ________________________________ Message 4 _____________________________________ Time: 03:37:57 AM PST US From: "Bob Leffler" Subject: RE: RV10-List: Door handles Steven, I see that you've added many new products to your site. The elevator trim bracket and the aluminum door guides caught my eye. Are you reselling Rivethead-Aero's product or are you manufacturing these yourself? Thanks, Bob From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Steven DiNieri Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 4:06 AM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Door handles Michael, i have been offering a handle kit similar to the Hendricks, but in a complete kit form, thinner in profile, specifically designed for the rv10. My design allows the latching system to remain in place as vans designed. when i started designing the handles the primary idea was to leave all the door latch mech alone. my handles simply replace the outside handle, just in a different position. they also allow standard lock cylinders for locking (just like the Hendricks) and i am introducing on the website this week a flush stainless lock system for all rv10's. easily installed into even flying aircraft. sorry to toot my own horn, but with all the talk about door and latches and the importance of such systems i just want all to know there are options... Steven dinieri iflyrv10.com ________________________________ Message 5 _____________________________________ Time: 04:12:40 AM PST US From: "Bob Leffler" Subject: RE: RV10-List: RV Grin Great news Gary! I'm looking forward to seeing you, Brenda, and both your RVs this summer. My wife is definitely coming and is anxious to meet all the RV-10 spouses. Please let us know how your Phase I goes. See ya in 109 days! bob From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of gary Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2008 8:07 PM Subject: RV10-List: RV Grin N204GS flew for the first time today. I have been telling folks that it would be done on Tuesday ever since I started building. The airplane flew perfectly. Gary 40274 ________________________________ Message 6 _____________________________________ Time: 04:52:06 AM PST US From: Rodger Todd Subject: Re: RV10-List: Re: NVFR avionics help Hi Chris, You'll need to replace (or add to) the SL-40 with an SL-30 which will give you a TSO'd VOR/LOC/GS. To this you will have to add an MD200 series CDI to maintain the TSO. Why don't you contact Jake (can't find his e-mail address at the moment) to confirm that you don't need anything else avionics wise? Also why noit try the Oz RV Yahoo group site? Looking forward to hearing about the first flight - Spring is in the air! Rodger --- On Wed, 9/4/08, Chris and Susie McGough wrote: > From: Chris and Susie McGough > Subject: Re: RV10-List: Re: NVFR avionics help > To: rv10-list@matronics.com > Date: Wednesday, 9 April, 2008, 8:13 AM > McGough" > > Mike ....my 10 is just about ready to fly and as per email > you can see my > current setup and wanted to go from there. > > thanks anyway regards Chris > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "AirMike" > To: > Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 3:39 PM > Subject: RV10-List: Re: NVFR avionics help > > > "AirMike" > > > > Obviously you are going through the time consuming > process of panel > > planning. After beating around the bush for 2 months, > I went with the SL30 > > as most of the threads here also indicate. I tried for > a long time to save > > the extra two thousand plus dollars on the SL40 (radio > only). I finally > > realized that it was false economy. Yes(Ron) you do > need the additional > > CDI and Glide slope lights. The AFS3500 has (built in) > the CDI indicators > > for guidance but you also need an audio panel for the > Marker Beacon > > lights. Yes that is another $1000. My panel is being > finished by the very > > nice folks at Aerotronics in Billings, MT. While I > have not yet received > > the panel, I am very impressed with the excellent > customer interaction and > > pro-active approach that Aerotronic takes. I got three > bids on my panel, > > but went with them on my intuition and the advice of a > member of the EAA > > advisory panel. I will give another report after I P/U > the panel later > > this month. This is my thinking that this a a ! > > serous NVFR panel and will get me out of trouble if > caught in IFR > > conditions. It seem to be a very cost effective setup. > Probably could save > > more with Dynon > > > > AFS3500 (1x) > > Garmin SL30 Nav/Com > > Garmin 327 Mode "C" Transponder > > Garmin 340 Audio > > Garmin 496 > > Digiflight II VS > > Trutrak B/U ADI Backup 2.25" > > UMA Altimeter Backup 2.25" > > UMA A/S Backup 2.25" > > Xaon XRX TCAS Beta (talks to 496) > > PAI Vertical Card compass > > > > -------- > > OSH '08 or Bust > > Q/B Kit - Ready to exit cabin top/door purgatory > > > > > > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > > > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=175661#175661 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ___________________________________________________________ Yahoo! For Good helps you make a difference http://uk.promotions.yahoo.com/forgood/ ________________________________ Message 7 _____________________________________ Time: 05:16:30 AM PST US From: "John Testement" Subject: RE: RV10-List: Re: The King has no Clothes Steve, How much for a set? John Testement jwt@roadmapscoaching.com 40321 Richmond, VA Painting do not archive -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Steven DiNieri Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 3:55 AM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Re: The King has no Clothes When I went to install a set in my rv10, I modified them to be much easier to install. After seeing my mods coupled with the shipping delays I was asked to reproduce a similar product by a few builders. I think they are a very good anchor for the door rods to latch into, and should add a margin of strength to the latch mech. I do offer them on my website (available immediately ;) sorry for the commercial announcement, I just want all to know there are options... Steve dinieri Iflyrv10.com > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com > [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of AirMike > Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 12:59 AM > To: rv10-list@matronics.com > Subject: RV10-List: Re: The King has no Clothes > > > I cannot imagine why anyone flying an RV10 does not install the very > excellent Rivethead door pins. They are tedious to install and adjust, > but they are really sweet and center the closure on the door giving a > positive feel when closing your door plus the whole install feels very > strong > > -------- > OSH '08 or Bust > Q/B Kit - Ready to exit cabin top/door purgatory > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=175658#175658 > > > > > > > > Photoshare, and much much more: > > > Checked by AVG. 7:10 AM Checked by AVG. 7:10 AM ________________________________ Message 8 _____________________________________ Time: 05:18:16 AM PST US From: "gary" Subject: RE: RV10-List: RV Grin Like all builders, I need to tackle the honey-do list. I have been lax in that area. Gary _____ From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Jesse Saint Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2008 10:48 PM Subject: Re: RV10-List: RV Grin Congratulations Gary! That's fantastic news. Now, since you like building so much, what is the next project going to be? :-) do not archive Jesse Saint Saint Aviation, Inc. jesse@saintaviation.com Cell: 352-427-0285 Fax: 815-377-3694 On Apr 8, 2008, at 7:07 PM, gary wrote: N204GS flew for the first time today. I have been telling folks that it would be done on Tuesday ever since I started building. The airplane flew perfectly. Gary 40274 ________________________________ Message 9 _____________________________________ Time: 06:16:35 AM PST US From: "gary" Subject: RE: RV10-List: RV Grin Unlike Deems I am not a very good documenter of my work, but here are a few pix. Gary 40274 _____ From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of John Testement Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2008 11:07 PM Subject: RE: RV10-List: RV Grin Congratulations Gary - let's see some more pix. John Testement jwt@roadmapscoaching.com 40321 Richmond, VA Painting do not archive _____ From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of gary Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2008 8:07 PM Subject: RV10-List: RV Grin N204GS flew for the first time today. I have been telling folks that it would be done on Tuesday ever since I started building. The airplane flew perfectly. Gary 40274 4/8/2008 7:30 AM Checked by AVG. 4/8/2008 7:30 AM ________________________________ Message 10 ____________________________________ Time: 06:44:10 AM PST US Subject: RV10-List: Re: P-Mag! From: "marcausman" I've had them for about 320 hours on my RV-7. Early on I had two failures and a third (which was my fault, you have to be very careful making the ignition wires). So I replaced one with a slick mag. The difference between the slick mag and the p-mag are very obvious when running the engine on only one mag (for testing, run-up etc.). Along the way, Brad and Tom were very helpful. More importantly, though, the last 160 hours or so have been flawless. So I can only deduce that they've worked out the bugs, at least based on my experience. If and when I build an RV-10 I'll put them on for sure. -------- Marc Ausman http://www.verticalpower.com RV-7 IO-390 Flying Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=175686#175686 ________________________________ Message 11 ____________________________________ Time: 06:56:46 AM PST US From: "Pascal" Subject: RV10-List: 2 blade Hartzell- SnF attendees SnF Attendees; http://www.hartzellprop.com/pressroom/pr_htm/pr_11_09_07.htm Could someone walk over to Hartzell and ask if the 2 blade Carbon blade would be a good option for the RV-10? If so what would be needed to get one? I am thinking although it's for the Diamond DA40 now, Hartzell may provide it for other aircraft as well. Since the three blade is in the Cirrus this blade may very well work for us. Thanks! Pascal ________________________________ Message 12 ____________________________________ Time: 07:05:09 AM PST US Subject: RE: RV10-List: Air field flow for the 10 From: "Bobby J. Hughes" Bob, RV6 pressure plot attached. The pressure areas on our 10's should be very similar if your using the stock cowl. The pressure does change depending on angle of attack. Here is another good site with lots of pressure data. Different airframe but the basic principles apply. http://www.melmoth2.com/ === message truncated == get=_blank>http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List p://forums.matronics.com blank>http://www.matronics.com/contribution href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List">http://www.matronics.com /Navigator?RV10-List href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/c


    Message 18


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:49:48 PM PST US
    From: Rick Sked <ricksked@embarqmail.com>
    Subject: Re: Doors coming off
    LOL...sure Gary....how bout we just slip a prefabricated rope loop between the door handles, installed after the doors are down and ummmm.... :) locke d. Rick Sked ----- Original Message ----- From: "gary" <speckter@comcast.net> Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 5:01:14 PM (GMT-0800) America/Los_Angeles Subject: RE: RV10-List: Doors coming off How about a bungee?=C2- LOL Gary 40274 From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@m atronics.com] On Behalf Of Perry, Phil Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 12:31 AM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Doors coming off I'm starting to think of a simple and inexpensive design.=C2- Like our co -builder Mr. Leffler, I'm still a ways away from reaching this point. However I've heard of a few RV-10's with handles that allow the door to be pulled down when you're sitting in the seat.=C2- I'm thinking of making t his pull down strap out of some higher strength material and actually hooki ng it inside the cabin to a fixed point. If it's done correctly, the handles will be functional and a open-door scen ario could result in only a couple of inches worth of opening. Sure it would be a distraction if you had to fly the plane with a door that was cracked open a few inches, but it sure beats having the door remove yo ur Horizontal Stab and tear up your airplane. It's cheap, simple, fool proof, and practical. Phil From: David McNeill [mailto:dlm46007@cox.net] Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 10:40 PM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Doors coming off One other idea we had was the placement of a knob on the door inside, back near the pin. this will allow complete control (two hands pulling) of posit ioning the door for closure. From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@m atronics.com] On Behalf Of Ben Westfall Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 8:24 PM Subject: RE: RV10-List: Doors coming off Vans did have an issue with a door early on with 410RV. =C2-I don =99t know the specifics but I think John C might. =C2-Hopefully he will c hime in.=C2- I don=99t know if the door came off or not but they di d have a door related issue. =C2-I think it was while going to/from Osh o r some other eastern states flyin. Ben Westfall From: owner-rv10-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server@m atronics.com] On Behalf Of Chris and Susie McGough Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 7:56 PM Subject: RV10-List: Doors coming off Guys are we 100% sure that the doors that have come off were latched corect ly where they go into the fuse frames. Are we sure that the door handles were closed properly and in the locked po sition? . Remember the tunnel heat problem, some have the problem but most do not. I would think Vans 10 would have close to 1000 hours on it , why has the do or not come off?? Does someone live close to Vans that can have a look and maybe do some measuring ? I am absolutely not saying there is no problem just need some facts I have written to Vans to the engieering department to see what they say regards Chris =C2- =C2- http://www.matronics.com/contribution =C2- =C2- =C2- href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List">http:// www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List href="http://forums.matronics.com"> http://forums.matronics.com href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution"> http://www.matronics.com/c =C2- =C2- href="http://www.matronics.com/N avigator?RV10-List">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List href="ht tp://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com href="http://www.m atronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/c =C2- =C2- http:// ======================= ==== ======================= ==




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   rv10-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/RV10-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/rv10-list
  • Browse RV10-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/rv10-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --