 |
Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
sbuc(at)hiwaay.net Guest
|
Posted: Thu Feb 19, 2009 8:43 pm Post subject: Sample maintenance log entry |
|
|
Kelly McMullen wrote:
| Quote: |
Not entirely true. Transponder/encoder biennial inspections also require
appropriate license.
|
You are correct, I should have been more specific. It is very common to
have the transponder stuff done in conjunction with pitot/static checks.
Sam Buchanan
====================
| Quote: |
>
> Anyone may legally do *any* work on an experimental aircraft (only
> exception
>
> is pitot-static certs), repairman's certificate or A&P are only needed
> for condition inspection.
>
> Sam Buchanan
|
| | - The Matronics RV-List Email Forum - | | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV-List |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jsflyrv(at)verizon.net Guest
|
Posted: Thu Feb 19, 2009 10:22 pm Post subject: Sample maintenance log entry |
|
|
Yes and if you read 43.1 (b) it well tell you that it does not apply to
aircraft issued an experimental certificate. So how do you comply with a
reg that say it does not apply to you?
do not archive
Michael wrote:
[quote] Well, guys I just read my Operation limitations and it says “This
aircraft MUST be maintained in accordance with the requirements of
title 14, code of federal regulations, Part 43.” So much for part 43
not applying to me……. Does any one else have this statement in there
op limitations? I new my understanding came from my local FSDO when
the Operation Limitations were cut. Any thoughts?
Mike
--
| | - The Matronics RV-List Email Forum - | | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV-List |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
g4mech(at)sbcglobal.net Guest
|
Posted: Thu Feb 19, 2009 10:48 pm Post subject: Sample maintenance log entry |
|
|
Well, if I get ramped you know which one will apply!!!! The more paperwork
the more the feds like it.
---
| | - The Matronics RV-List Email Forum - | | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV-List |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aerobubba(at)earthlink.ne Guest
|
Posted: Fri Feb 20, 2009 6:19 am Post subject: Sample maintenance log entry |
|
|
Hi Mike-
| Quote: | Ok, my understanding is that once the aircraft has an airworthiness
certificate not just ANYONE can do the work.
|
This is a common misunderstanding. For starters, part 43 has an appendix
that specifically delineates what mx a pilot may perform and sign off.
Beyond that, one of the avenues to earning an A&P is hands on experience.
Obviously, work is being performed by non-rated individuals. The key is
that the work is certified and signed off by a properly rated individual.
Likewise, very many museum aircraft are maintained by unrated volunteers,
but their work is inspected and signed off the right folks. It happens
every day-
glen matejcek
aerobubba(at)earthlink.net
| | - The Matronics RV-List Email Forum - | | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV-List |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mrobert569(at)hotmail.com Guest
|
Posted: Fri Feb 20, 2009 9:03 am Post subject: Sample maintenance log entry |
|
|
OK. I have noted a couple of things here that I think need clarifiying. AS was stated C the first part of FAR 43 states that it does not apply to experimental aircraft. What does guide us back to parts of FAR 43 is the aircraft's operating limitations. That would be the part about the yearly condition inspection log entry where it gives you a statement to copy and then complete it with name C signature C certificate type C and number in accordance with FAR 43.11.
What drives us to FAR 43.9 for logbook entries is in FAR 91 in the subpart about maintenance (sorry C but I don't have my FARs right here as I am on the road). What drives us to FAR 91 maintenance is the (usually) first paragraph of the operating limitations that says something along the lines that the aircraft will be operating in accordance with all the operating rules of part 91. So...unless a paragraph in part 91 (i.e 91.205) states that it does not apply to experimentals then it does apply. That is why we have the transponder and pitot-static checks needing to be checked by a certified person/agency. Now C if you have more current operating limitations it will bring in parts of 91.205 regarding the maintenance of any instruments that are listed in 91.205. If also states the that "unless equipped IAW the night and/or instrument requirements of 91.205 the aircraft is restricted to day VFR". Older sircraft may have something different.
As far of Michael's statement in his operating limitations about the aircraft being required to be maintained IAW the the requirements of part 43 C that possibly sounds like it may be something the local FSDO put in. I would need to talk to Mike a little more to be sure. But C if this is true then it can be changed.
As far as major alterations/changes the Operating Limitations cover this. If you have older ops limits then it may say tha you can not operate the aircraft after making a major change without contacting the FSDO first. The latest versions states that you may make the major change C make a logbook entry detailing the change and place the aircraft in phase 1 for a minimum of five hours. Then you must contact the FSDO to let them know of the change and where you propose to conduct the test flights. The fsdo also may place more than 5 hours on you phase 1 time C but they do NOT need to look at the aircraft again nor re-certify it.
Now....as to ADs. Here is the botom line. It very clearly states in FAR 39 that ADs cover all aircraft and products C so "yes" ADs do apply to experimentals C BUT it has been determined by the FAA legal folks in Washington DC that it can not be enforced with regards to Amateur-built aircraft. So amateur-builts C even if a typed certificated engine is installed C do not have to comply with any AD. Here is the catch though. While the FAA won't do anything if you overfly an AD C your insurance company may not cover you in the event of an accident if you fail to comply with an AD. Check with you agent to find out.
Last thing. If you have older C or unclear Operating Limitations C you can apply to the local FSDO C and now C some DARs C to issue new Operating Limitations with all the latest and greatest authorizations.
I know this is a bit long winded but I am hoping this clarifies a few things. If you have any specific questions feel free to drop me a line directly
| | - The Matronics RV-List Email Forum - | | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV-List |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
g4mech(at)sbcglobal.net Guest
|
Posted: Fri Feb 20, 2009 9:45 am Post subject: Sample maintenance log entry |
|
|
Mike,
You are spot on with some of your statements in my ops limits; my local FSDO is Los Angeles. I changed my tail number and the local FSDO said they had no time to re cut my ops specs which hade my old tail number on them. I don’t know why the FAA doesn’t just put the serial number of the aircraft so ops limits don’t have to be changed for a simple N number change. I talked to the manager in the FSDO about why they couldn’t accommodate me? He said they were mandated to ignore my issue due to not enough man power to handle the case. So I had to pay a DAR to cut me new ops limits and 600 bucks thank you very much. I don’t want to change my 43 statement because it doesn’t affect me, I am a mechanic for a living and I don’t want to pay 600 bucks again. I am sure most people don’t realize too if you move the aircraft to a different FSDO region they want you to inform them that you are operating out of there region. Is this my local being a pain or is it a nation wide thing? Thank you for your knowledge and helping with the issue at hand.
--
| | - The Matronics RV-List Email Forum - | | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV-List |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sbuc(at)hiwaay.net Guest
|
Posted: Fri Feb 20, 2009 12:05 pm Post subject: Sample maintenance log entry |
|
|
Michael wrote:
| Quote: | Mike,
You are spot on with some of your statements in my ops limits; my local FSDO
is Los Angeles. I changed my tail number and the local FSDO said they had no
time to re cut my ops specs which hade my old tail number on them. I don't
know why the FAA doesn't just put the serial number of the aircraft so ops
limits don't have to be changed for a simple N number change. I talked to
the manager in the FSDO about why they couldn't accommodate me? He said
they were mandated to ignore my issue due to not enough man power to handle
the case. So I had to pay a DAR to cut me new ops limits and 600 bucks thank
you very much. I don't want to change my 43 statement because it doesn't
affect me, I am a mechanic for a living and I don't want to pay 600 bucks
again. I am sure most people don't realize too if you move the aircraft to a
different FSDO region they want you to inform them that you are operating
out of there region. Is this my local being a pain or is it a nation wide
thing? Thank you for your knowledge and helping with the issue at hand.
|
Michael,
Your statement about the FAR 43 reference in your operating limitations
is the first time I have ever heard of an experimental being tied to FAR
43 maintenance protocol. This is not a national practice, and is one I
suspect violates the template of experimental certification as
recognized nationwide. Sounds like some overzealous FAA-types with
limited experimental experience got their hands on your op lims.
This is unfortunate due to the expense you would incur for changes and
also how your paperwork would *really* hurt the resale value of your
plane. I can't imagine someone up to speed on experimental regs wanting
to purchase an RV-7 with your op lims. Fortunately you can legally do
all the maintenance but rest assured your case is a rare exception.
Best regards,
Sam Buchanan
http://thervjournal.com
| | - The Matronics RV-List Email Forum - | | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV-List |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
timb
Joined: 16 Apr 2008 Posts: 77 Location: Frankston, Texas
|
Posted: Fri Feb 20, 2009 1:33 pm Post subject: Sample maintenance log entry |
|
|
In addition I think 600 bucks for those changes is pretty absurd. I didn't
pay half that to get my dar to inspect my plane and issue them in the first
place. Sounds like they need some new blood in that area. Where are you
Michael?
Tim Bryan
RV-6 Flying
N616TB over 120 hours now
[quote] --
| | - The Matronics RV-List Email Forum - | | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV-List |
|
_________________ Tim Bryan
RV-6 Flying
N616TB |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sbuc(at)hiwaay.net Guest
|
Posted: Fri Feb 20, 2009 2:55 pm Post subject: Sample maintenance log entry |
|
|
Sam Buchanan wrote:
| Quote: |
Michael wrote:
> Mike,
>
>
> You are spot on with some of your statements in my ops limits; my
> local FSDO is Los Angeles. I changed my tail number and the local
> FSDO said they had no time to re cut my ops specs which hade my old
> tail number on them. I don't know why the FAA doesn't just put the
> serial number of the aircraft so ops limits don't have to be
> changed for a simple N number change. I talked to the manager in
> the FSDO about why they couldn't accommodate me? He said they were
> mandated to ignore my issue due to not enough man power to handle
> the case. So I had to pay a DAR to cut me new ops limits and 600
> bucks thank you very much. I don't want to change my 43 statement
> because it doesn't affect me, I am a mechanic for a living and I
> don't want to pay 600 bucks again. I am sure most people don't
> realize too if you move the aircraft to a different FSDO region
> they want you to inform them that you are operating out of there
> region. Is this my local being a pain or is it a nation wide thing?
> Thank you for your knowledge and helping with the issue at hand.
>
Michael,
Your statement about the FAR 43 reference in your operating
limitations is the first time I have ever heard of an experimental
being tied to FAR 43 maintenance protocol. This is not a national
practice, and is one I suspect violates the template of experimental
certification as recognized nationwide. Sounds like some overzealous
FAA-types with limited experimental experience got their hands on
your op lims.
This is unfortunate due to the expense you would incur for changes
and also how your paperwork would *really* hurt the resale value of
your plane. I can't imagine someone up to speed on experimental regs
wanting to purchase an RV-7 with your op lims. Fortunately you can
legally do all the maintenance but rest assured your case is a rare
exception.
|
To extend the thought, does the demand per your RV-7 operating
limitations for FAR 43 maintenance mean that all replacement parts must
meet FAA-PMA and TSO standards??? And if that is the case, to what type
certificate are you supposed to comply?
Wow...the more I think about this thing the more my head hurts......
If this was my plane, I would get the legal standards folks of the EAA
involved and get those op lims fixed.
Sam Buchanan
| | - The Matronics RV-List Email Forum - | | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV-List |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bill(at)bergner.com Guest
|
Posted: Fri Feb 20, 2009 3:34 pm Post subject: Sample maintenance log entry |
|
|
The Allentown FSDO did the paperwork for me for free 2 years ago and they
were very accommodating and pleasant to work with. I don't know if their
policy is different now.
--
| | - The Matronics RV-List Email Forum - | | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV-List |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mrobert569(at)hotmail.com Guest
|
Posted: Fri Feb 20, 2009 4:40 pm Post subject: Sample maintenance log entry |
|
|
It is your local FSDO being a pain. There is absolutely no legal requirement to inform the local FSDO if you move.
Also C if you do not like the way you are being treated by your local FSDO you have the right to call their next higher up manager and file a complaint. That is called invoking the customer service initiative. Reissuing operating limitations and a new airworthiness certificate takes about 20 minutes. If you don't want to hassle with your local FSDO you can go to another FSDO like Van Nuys or Riverside.
Mike R.
Das Fed
From: g4mech(at)sbcglobal.net
To: rv-list(at)matronics.com
Subject: RE: Sample maintenance log entry
Date: Fri C 20 Feb 2009 09:41:43 -0800
Mike C
You are spot on with some of your statements in my ops limits; my local FSDO is Los Angeles. I changed my tail number and the local FSDO said they had no time to re cut my ops specs which hade my old tail number on them. I don’t know why the FAA doesn’t just put the serial number of the aircraft so ops limits don’t have to be changed for a simple N number change. I talked to the manager in the FSDO about why they couldn’t accommodate me? He said they were mandated to ignore my issue due to not enough man power to handle the case. So I had to pay a DAR to cut me new ops limits and 600 bucks thank you very much. I don’t want to change my 43 statement because it doesn’t affect me C I am a mechanic for a living and I don’t want to pay 600 bucks again. I am sure most people don’t realize too if you move the aircraft to a different FSDO region they want you to inform them that you are operating out of there region. Is this my local being a pain or is it a nation wide thing? Thank you for your knowledge and helping with the issue at hand.
--
| | - The Matronics RV-List Email Forum - | | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV-List |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mrobert569(at)hotmail.com Guest
|
Posted: Fri Feb 20, 2009 4:42 pm Post subject: Sample maintenance log entry |
|
|
The policy is up to the local FSDO managment and is supposed to be dictated by man power availability.
Mike R.
[quote] From: bill(at)bergner.com
To: rv-list(at)matronics.com
Subject: RE: Sample maintenance log entry
Date: Fri C 20 Feb 2009 18:29:23 -0500
--> RV-List message posted by: "Bill Bergner" <bill(at)bergner.com>
The Allentown FSDO did the paperwork for me for free 2 years ago and they
were very accommodating and pleasant to work with. I don't know if their
policy is different now.
--
| | - The Matronics RV-List Email Forum - | | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV-List |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
g4mech(at)sbcglobal.net Guest
|
Posted: Fri Feb 20, 2009 10:05 pm Post subject: Sample maintenance log entry |
|
|
Yea I hear ya but never fear I will NEVER sell my plane to anyone.......I
will live in it and sell my house first!!! Resale...naww I don't thing so
because the limits can be amended really for a nominal fee if one desire so.
If value is based on 600 dollar change..then I don't want to deal with a
buyer like that. Cheers
---
| | - The Matronics RV-List Email Forum - | | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV-List |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
g4mech(at)sbcglobal.net Guest
|
Posted: Fri Feb 20, 2009 10:33 pm Post subject: Sample maintenance log entry |
|
|
I don't see how part 43 talks about approved parts. Why would I change the
op limits???? I am a full time aircraft mechanic, my ops limitations do not
hinder me in anyway. If you are a non A&P and want to " save money" by
owning an experimental then I could see ones point. My RV is just like
anyone else's, condition inspection and logical maintenance standards.
---
| | - The Matronics RV-List Email Forum - | | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV-List |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
g4mech(at)sbcglobal.net Guest
|
Posted: Fri Feb 20, 2009 10:33 pm Post subject: Sample maintenance log entry |
|
|
Thanks for the insight Mike, I knew they were just being a pain in the ass.
[quote] ---
| | - The Matronics RV-List Email Forum - | | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV-List |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mr.sun
Joined: 30 Jan 2007 Posts: 85
|
Posted: Tue Feb 24, 2009 7:56 pm Post subject: Sample maintenance log entry |
|
|
Dear Das Fed,
I built an RV-9 for 3 years and then bought a finished (and beautiful) RV-7, sold the -9 partially completed (on gear with canopy done, firewall forward was next). Can I use my building and maintenance of my two RV experiences (most done with my licensed A/P helper right there with me) to go towards my own A&P license? I do all my own work and he still signs off the annual and complements my work. Would sure like to get my own A&P license before he retires or moves on.
Greg
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 8:43 AM, Mike Robertson <mrobert569(at)hotmail.com (mrobert569(at)hotmail.com)> wrote:
[quote] You are correct. On an amateur-built aircraft ANYONE may do the maintenance, or major alteration, and sign off the logbook in accordance with the logbook entry requirements of FAR 43.9. In addition, if it is a major alteration you must follow the procedure stated in the aircraft's operating limitations. The repairman certificate only is needed to conduct the yearly condition inpsection and sign it off. Again, this is stated the the aircraft's operating limitations. If you have any specific questions drop me a line.
Mike Robertson
Das Fed
[quote] I thought that the repairman's cert allowed me to do the annual and being the builder allowed me to do the maintenance.
Time for more research....
--
| | - The Matronics RV-List Email Forum - | | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV-List |
|
_________________ Greg RV-7 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bruce(at)glasair.org Guest
|
Posted: Tue Feb 24, 2009 10:12 pm Post subject: Sample maintenance log entry |
|
|
You should check with your local FSDO.
Bruce
www.Glasair.org
--
| | - The Matronics RV-List Email Forum - | | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV-List |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kellym
Joined: 10 Jan 2006 Posts: 1706 Location: Sun Lakes AZ
|
Posted: Wed Feb 25, 2009 6:20 am Post subject: Sample maintenance log entry |
|
|
The key is to have all of your build logs with hours detailed, add all
those up in a spreadsheet, and ensure that the total exceeds the minimum
4800 hours for all of your airframe and powerplant work. You need that
and FAA form 8610-2 filled out. Use your spreadsheet as a continuation
sheet for your experience. It also helps to have a recommendation letter
from an A&P who is familiar with your work. You make an appt with FSDO
maintenance inspector and he will spend an hour or more ascertaining
your familiarity with maintenance, then sign off, approving you to take
the tests. There are 3 writtens, and oral and practical. Contact me off
list if you need more info.
Kelly
A&P/IA
Bruce Gray wrote:
[quote]
You should check with your local FSDO.
Bruce
www.Glasair.org <http://www.Glasair.org>
--
| | - The Matronics RV-List Email Forum - | | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV-List |
|
_________________ Kelly McMullen
A&P/IA, EAA Tech Counselor # 5286
KCHD |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bobbyhester(at)newwavecom Guest
|
Posted: Wed Feb 25, 2009 6:43 am Post subject: Sample maintenance log entry |
|
|
I built an RV7A. I am now working at Ft. Campbell, KY on Blackhawk helicopters. When I visited my FSDO with my letter from work, It was what I needed to get my tickets, I had worked there a little over 2-1/2 yrs, which is what was required. I asked about the time I spent building my RV7A and was told that does not count at all. But I agree with the other message check with your local FSDO.
mr.gsun(at)gmail.com (mr.gsun(at)gmail.com) wrote: [quote]Dear Das Fed,
I built an RV-9 for 3 years and then bought a finished (and beautiful) RV-7, sold the -9 partially completed (on gear with canopy done, firewall forward was next). Can I use my building and maintenance of my two RV experiences (most done with my licensed A/P helper right there with me) to go towards my own A&P license? I do all my own work and he still signs off the annual and complements my work. Would sure like to get my own A&P license before he retires or moves on.
Greg
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 8:43 AM, Mike Robertson <mrobert569(at)hotmail.com (mrobert569(at)hotmail.com)> wrote:
[quote] You are correct. On an amateur-built aircraft ANYONE may do the maintenance, or major alteration, and sign off the logbook in accordance with the logbook entry requirements of FAR 43.9. In addition, if it is a major alteration you must follow the procedure stated in the aircraft's operating limitations. The repairman certificate only is needed to conduct the yearly condition inpsection and sign it off. Again, this is stated the the aircraft's operating limitations. If you have any specific questions drop me a line.
Mike Robertson
Das Fed
> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 11:26:01 -0500
> From: recapen(at)earthlink.net (recapen(at)earthlink.net)
> To: rv-list(at)matronics.com (rv-list(at)matronics.com)
> Subject: Re: Sample maintenance log entry
>
> --> RV-List message posted by: "Ralph E. Capen" <recapen(at)earthlink.net (recapen(at)earthlink.net)>
>
> I thought that the repairman's cert allowed me to do the annual and being the builder allowed me to do the maintenance.
>
> Time for more research....
>
> --
| | - The Matronics RV-List Email Forum - | | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV-List |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mrobert569(at)hotmail.com Guest
|
Posted: Wed Feb 25, 2009 7:24 am Post subject: Sample maintenance log entry |
|
|
Greg C
Your time spent building and maintaining your amateur-built aircraft can count towards your 18 or 30 month time requirement. How much will have to be determined by the FAA inspector that will need to sign off your application. I can tell you that you will need to also get a considerable amount of time working on type certificated aircraft to qualify. And I can also tell you that very little time will be able to count towards the powerplant portion of the rating. For that side make sure you document any time spent changing cylinders and/or anything bolted to the engine as it came from the factory (i.e. alternators and exhaust systems are airframe compnents).
Mike Robertson
Das Fed
Date: Tue C 24 Feb 2009 19:53:45 -0800
Subject: Re: Sample maintenance log entry
From: mr.gsun(at)gmail.com
To: rv-list(at)matronics.com
Dear Das Fed C
I built an RV-9 for 3 years and then bought a finished (and beautiful) RV-7 C sold the -9 partially completed (on gear with canopy done C firewall forward was next). Can I use my building and maintenance of my two RV experiences (most done with my licensed A/P helper right there with me) to go towards my own A&P license? I do all my own work and he still signs off the annual and complements my work. Would sure like to get my own A&P license before he retires or moves on.
Greg
On Tue C Feb 17 C 2009 at 8:43 AM C Mike Robertson <mrobert569(at)hotmail.com (mrobert569(at)hotmail.com)> wrote:
[quote] You are correct. On an amateur-built aircraft ANYONE may do the maintenance C or major alteration C and sign off the logbook in accordance with the logbook entry requirements of FAR 43.9. In addition C if it is a major alteration you must follow the procedure stated in the aircraft's operating limitations. The repairman certificate only is needed to conduct the yearly condition inpsection and sign it off. Again C this is stated the the aircraft's operating limitations. If you have any specific questions drop me a line.
Mike Robertson
Das Fed
> --> RV-List message posted by: "Ralph E. Capen" <recapen(at)earthlink.net (recapen(at)earthlink.net)>
> I thought that the repairman's cert allowed me to do the annual and being the builder allowed me to do the maintenance.
[quote]
Time for more research....
--
| | - The Matronics RV-List Email Forum - | | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV-List |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|