 |
Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelect Guest
|
Posted: Wed Feb 29, 2012 11:46 am Post subject: Dipole antenna fabrication |
|
|
Correction of typo . . .
| Quote: | It took 0.2 to 0.33 uV (6 to 10 dB increase)
to make that much difference.
|
Bob . . .
| | - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jan_de_jong(at)casema.nl Guest
|
Posted: Wed Feb 29, 2012 12:57 pm Post subject: Dipole antenna fabrication |
|
|
| Quote: | I am glad to see others post good info. There are many Hams out there who are quite skilled in this area. Thanks Jan de Jong. I'll be building one of those for my Glastar's vertical stab.
I am thinking of building one of those for the Europa vertical stab as
|
well. The V-shape adjusts the impedance to 50 Ohms and improves
horizontal directivity . Whether it also increases bandwidth ("more
volume" - despite using cloth hanger wire?) I don't know.
Remarks:
- the lengths mentioned in the article may a little too great for
perfection when put inside a fiberglass structure, even when not touching
- the Pawsey stub could be tuned using a SWR meter and a dummy load
instead of the antenna; looking for largest possible SWR over the air
band; the transmitter used could be protected with a guaranteed load by
50 Ohm in-out voltage divider
- after that the antenna could be tuned looking for the smallest
possible SWR over the air band.
- if things are to be tuned anyway then the only concern in construction
is treating both legs of the dipole the same
I may instead go for the straight dipole as follows:
http://www.europa-aircraft.com/pdfs/buildersmanuals/CBM%20-%20ANNEX%20C.pdf
with the beads replaced by a (verified if not tuned) Pawsey stub, as
good enough.
As an added measure 2 choke baluns 1/4 wavelength apart anywhere on the
feedline would be effective.
I also found some literally orphaned DOS programs to play with:
http://www.zerobeat.net/G4FGQ/page3.html#S301%22
SOLNOID3 shows the effect of 4 turns of 5mm wire (coax) on 45mm former
(min. bending diameter) as a choke balun
LINELEN shows dipole performance in terms of losses, assuming a choke
balun. Amazingly the largest effect is the type of coax where I thought
RG58 would be good enough for my needs.
I think Bob is right - it's not all that critical. Good enough is not so
much worse than perfection.
I should get back to my regular program now from this interesting
diversion into radio.
Jan de Jong
* <http://www.zerobeat.net/G4FGQ/solnoid3.exe>*
| | - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelect Guest
|
Posted: Thu Mar 01, 2012 10:02 am Post subject: Dipole antenna fabrication |
|
|
At 02:54 PM 2/29/2012, you wrote:
| Quote: | --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: Jan de Jong <jan_de_jong(at)casema.nl>
|
Did some further study on baluns in general and the
Pawsey stub in particular. I discovered an interesting
article supported by bench testing on good equipment.
I captured the article with the intent of mirroring
it on aeroelectric.com
I made an unhappy discovery that there were a number
of html syntax errors in the index of articles pertaining
to antenna issues which I've corrected. The errors
broke links to a number of antenna features. I believe
they're fixed and all is right with the world . . . at
least under the heading of "Antennas, Feedlines and Connectors"
In addition to the balun article, you'll find a compendium
of Bob Archer articles that I uploaded to the website several
years ago . . . and then left them dangling link-less.
See:
http://tinyurl.com/857u8x8
In the Huggins balun article I spotted a some toe-stubbers
like, "Velocity Factor actually varies from 0.7 to over
1 depending . . ." Of course, the velocity factor could
never exceed 1.0.
Aside from a few items that would benefit from editing,
I found the article informative.
Bob . . . [quote][b]
| | - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rlborger(at)mac.com Guest
|
Posted: Thu Mar 01, 2012 11:40 am Post subject: Dipole antenna fabrication |
|
|
Bob,
Speaking of Bob Archer and his antennas…
I was able to connect my new Red Dot analyzer into the line between my MicroAir 760 and the Bob Archer antenna I have mounted in the vertical stab of the Europa.
Here's a picture of the antenna installation:
[img]cid:B603EF70-0DC9-43CF-A07D-FB0FD0A47F79[/img]
The coax termination to antenna is as per Archer's instructions. Crimp eyelets on to the central conductor and onto a braid made from the shield wire. Apply some shrink tube on the braid and coax for insulation and support. Then attach the eyelets to the antenna with nuts & lock washers over the screw posts.
Always looked pretty crude to me, but those were the instructions so I that's what I did.
Measured SWR 1:1.2 Not bad at all.
Blue skies & tailwinds,
Bob Borger
Europa XS Tri, Rotax 914, Airmaster C/S Prop.
Little Toot Sport Biplane, Lycoming Thunderbolt AEIO-320 EXP
3705 Lynchburg Dr.
Corinth, TX 76208-5331
Cel: 817-992-1117
rlborger(at)mac.com (rlborger(at)mac.com)
On Mar 1, 2012, at 11:59 AM, Robert L. Nuckolls, III wrote:
| Quote: | At 02:54 PM 2/29/2012, you wrote:
Did some further study on baluns in general and the
Pawsey stub in particular. I discovered an interesting
article supported by bench testing on good equipment.
I captured the article with the intent of mirroring
it on aeroelectric.com
I made an unhappy discovery that there were a number
of html syntax errors in the index of articles pertaining
to antenna issues which I've corrected. The errors
broke links to a number of antenna features. I believe
they're fixed and all is right with the world . . . at
least under the heading of "Antennas, Feedlines and Connectors"
In addition to the balun article, you'll find a compendium
of Bob Archer articles that I uploaded to the website several
years ago . . . and then left them dangling link-less.
See:
http://tinyurl.com/857u8x8
In the Huggins balun article I spotted a some toe-stubbers
like, "Velocity Factor actually varies from 0.7 to over
1 depending . . ." Of course, the velocity factor could
never exceed 1.0.
Aside from a few items that would benefit from editing,
I found the article informative.
Bob . . . | Quote: |
href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List
href="http://forums.matronics.com/">http://forums.matronics.com
href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/contribution
|
|
| | - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
86.47 KB |
| Viewed: |
4070 Time(s) |

|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jan_de_jong(at)casema.nl Guest
|
Posted: Thu Mar 01, 2012 12:05 pm Post subject: Dipole antenna fabrication |
|
|
Thank you Bob,
1. The Morris and Bob Archer pdf's are still not available from the
index I'm afraid but can be found using the search facility.
2. The Higgins measurements made me think that a simple VSWR meter might
be used to tune a Pawsey stub in the presence of a dielectric other than
air.
What bothers me is that Mr Higgins seems to measure a velocity factor of
1.07 (322 / 300). I wonder what might account for that.
Fascinating stuff that almost makes me buy a simple antenna & complex
impedance analyzer. But not quite (yet).
Jan de Jong
| | - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelect Guest
|
Posted: Thu Mar 01, 2012 1:16 pm Post subject: Dipole antenna fabrication |
|
|
At 02:00 PM 3/1/2012, you wrote:
| Quote: |
Thank you Bob,
1. The Morris and Bob Archer pdf's are still not available from the
index I'm afraid but can be found using the search facility.
|
Thanks for the heads-up. I think it's fixed now.
Found a couple more un-linked features.
| Quote: | 2. The Higgins measurements made me think that a simple VSWR meter
might be used to tune a Pawsey stub in the presence of a dielectric
other than air.
|
Yeah . . . that's worth some tinkering time on the
workbench. Don't have time right now but I've got
lots of coax scraps that I can used to refine my
own understanding.
| Quote: | What bothers me is that Mr Higgins seems to measure a velocity
factor of 1.07 (322 / 300). I wonder what might account for that.
|
I didn't catch those warts the first time I read the
article. I was too fascinated by the test data. I'll
but this on my list of things to read. I think there
are links to contact him directly. I'll verify any
'fixes' to the article with him directly.
Bob . . .
| | - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelect Guest
|
Posted: Thu Mar 01, 2012 2:51 pm Post subject: Dipole antenna fabrication |
|
|
| Quote: |
Always looked pretty crude to me, but those were the instructions so
I that's what I did.
Measured SWR 1:1.2 Not bad at all.
|
Not surprised. I suspect that Bob's fabrication of
the gamma-match and associated capacitor are designed
to tune out much of the reactance added by the bare,
non-coaxial lead wires. The wide geometry of the
radiating elements do doubt contributes to a wider
performance band-width.
Bob . . .
| | - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|