  | 
				Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists   
				 | 
			 
		 
		 
	
		| View previous topic :: View next topic   | 
	 
	
	
		| Author | 
		Message | 
	 
	
		haribole
 
 
  Joined: 21 Feb 2014 Posts: 33 Location: United States
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2017 9:59 am    Post subject: Dual Battery design | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				I was originally planning on using the Z19B, but came across a print out of what looks like a much simpler dual batter design. Not sure where I printed this from, but this surely looks like an aeroelectric design and can not find this in the 12th edition book.
 could someone please see if they recognize this and enlighten me?
 Thanks
 Hari
 
  |  | - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
  
 | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		haribole
 
 
  Joined: 21 Feb 2014 Posts: 33 Location: United States
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2017 10:39 am    Post subject: Dual Battery design | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Forgot the attachment.
 On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 9:55 AM, Hariharan Gopalan <rdu.hari(at)gmail.com (rdu.hari(at)gmail.com)> wrote:
  	  | Quote: | 	 		  I was originally planning on using the Z19B, but came across a print out of what looks like a much simpler dual batter design. Not sure where I printed this from, but this surely looks like an aeroelectric design and can not find this in the 12th edition book.
 could someone please see if they recognize this and enlighten me?
 Thanks
 Hari
 
   | 	 
 
 
  |  | - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
  
	
  
	 
	
	
		
	 
	
		|  Description: | 
		
			
		 | 
		  Download | 
	 
	
		|  Filename: | 
		 Doc_-_Jan_19_2017_-_12-43_PM.pdf | 
	 
	
		|  Filesize: | 
		 276.13 KB | 
	 
	
		|  Downloaded: | 
		 551 Time(s) | 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		user9253
 
 
  Joined: 28 Mar 2008 Posts: 1944 Location: Riley TWP Michigan
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2017 7:44 pm    Post subject: Re: Dual Battery design | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				That is not one of Bob N's schematics.  It has some major flaws.
 The starter current goes through the ammeter shunt.
 The E-bus relay coil appears to be always grounded but is not.
 The 4 pole switch is a single failure point.
 The 20 amp circuit breaker for the starter contactor and solenoid seems too big.
 The 200 amp ANL alternator current limiter seems way too big.
 The 200 amp ANL battery current limiters are unnecessary and should not be in series with starter motor.
 
  |  | - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
  
 _________________ Joe Gores | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelect Guest
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Fri Jan 20, 2017 6:03 am    Post subject: Dual Battery design | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				At 12:36 PM 1/19/2017, you wrote:
   	  | Quote: | 	 		  Forgot the attachment.
 
  On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 9:55 AM, Hariharan Gopalan <rdu.hari(at)gmail.com (rdu.hari(at)gmail.com)> wrote:
    I was originally planning on using the Z19B, but came across a print out of what looks like a much simpler dual batter design. Not sure where I printed this from, but this surely looks like an aeroelectric design and can not find this in the 12th edition book.
 
   could someone please see if they recognize this and enlighten me?
    | 	  
    That drawing uses symbols from my library
    and suggests a strong influence from
    AEC architecture drawings . . . but it
    is not my drawing. It also deviates from
    recommended practices in several regards.
 
  
  
    Bob . . .
 
  |  | - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
  
 | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelect Guest
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Fri Jan 20, 2017 6:05 am    Post subject: Dual Battery design | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				At 12:36 PM 1/19/2017, you wrote:
   	  | Quote: | 	 		  Forgot the attachment.
 
  On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 9:55 AM, Hariharan Gopalan <rdu.hari(at)gmail.com (rdu.hari(at)gmail.com)> wrote:  I was originally planning on using the Z19B, but came across a print out of what looks like a much simpler dual batter design. Not sure where I printed this from, but this surely looks like an aeroelectric design and can not find this in the 12th edition book.
   could someone please see if they recognize this and enlighten me? | 	   
    That drawing uses symbols from my library
    and suggests a strong influence from
    AEC architecture drawings . . . but it
    is not my drawing. It also deviates from
    recommended practices in several regards.
 
  
  
    Bob . . .
 
  |  | - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
  
 | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		haribole
 
 
  Joined: 21 Feb 2014 Posts: 33 Location: United States
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Fri Jan 20, 2017 1:42 pm    Post subject: Re: Dual Battery design | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Thanks Bob.  I remember reading sometime back about a proposed alternative to the Z-19 dual battery design. Is there one that has still not been published in the book?
 
 Thanks
 Hari
 
  |  | - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
  
 | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelect Guest
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2017 5:18 am    Post subject: Dual Battery design | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				At 03:42 PM 1/20/2017, you wrote:
   	  | Quote: | 	 		  --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "haribole" <rdu.hari(at)gmail.com>
 
  Thanks Bob.  I remember reading sometime back about a proposed alternative to the Z-19 dual battery design. Is there one that has still not been published in the book? | 	  
    Let's back up a bit. What is it about Z-19 that
    makes it attractive to your project? Keep
    in mind that the z-figures are not 'wire books'.
    They do not propose to SPECIFY sizes of wires,
    size/style of protection, size or type of battery(ies),
    size of alternators, style of switches, etc.
 
    They are illustrations that suggest architectures
    that strive for the elegant solution to meeting
    design goals that FIT your machine/mission profiles.
    M/MP. Z-14 MIGHT make sense for a Lancair IVP, but
    Z-13/8 could very well accomplish the builder's
    M/MP.
 
    The Z-figures do indeed show some SIZED protective
    devices and similarly sized wires . . . but EVERY
    component you choose to install should be verified
    for suitability to task and evaluated for how it
    fits into your failure mode effects analysis.
 
    How can it fail? How would I know it failed in
    flight? Would failure present an unacceptable
    level of risk to comfortable termination of
    flight? Is the failure pre-flight detectable?
    What is my Plan-B for making such failures
    a simple maintenance issue as opposed to an
    emergency?
 
    So tell us about your project. How to do plan
    to use it? In your cruise down the isles of
    simple ideas in the 'Connection, what features
    offered seem a best-fit for design goals based
    on your M/MP?
 
    The  Dual battery concepts were crafted in response
    to the rise in interest for using electrically dependent
    engines in aircraft. HOWEVER, having an electrically
    dependent engine does not necessarily dictate that
    two batteries are the best choice. 
 
    Let's talk about it . . .
 
  
  
    Bob . . .
 
  |  | - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
  
 | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		 | 
	 
 
  
	 
	    
	   | 
	
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
  | 
   
 
  
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
  
		 |