  | 
				Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists   
				 | 
			 
		 
		 
	
		| View previous topic :: View next topic   | 
	 
	
	
		| Author | 
		Message | 
	 
	
		bakerocb
 
 
  Joined: 15 Jan 2006 Posts: 727 Location: FAIRFAX VA
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2006 7:28 am    Post subject: antennas | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Responding to an AeroElectric-List message previously posted by: "bob noffs" 
 <icubob(at)newnorth.net>
 
 2/10/2006
 
 Hello Bob, Dare I post some heresy? Will the gummint sic its watch dogs on 
 me? Will the electromagnetic radiation purists on the list rise up in total 
 fury to slap me down? Well, I'll take a chance.
 
 Suppose that the gummint, in its infinite wisdom, mandated that every 
 aircraft carry 3 pounds of butter and a container of maple syrup just in 
 case the survival situation after crashing resulted in a supply of pancakes 
 as the available food supply. Would you insist on carrying genuine maple 
 syrup or would an imitation be good enough for you?
 
 Maybe an ELT is a little more useful than butter and maple syrup in a crash 
 situation, but I sure as hell wouldn't place my entire faith in being found 
 and rescued in one of the garden variety ELT's that we are mandated to 
 carry. My point is that obsessing over antenna ground plane details is 
 wasted time.
 
 Nobody knows exactly what attitude their aircraft will be in when it 
 finishes crashing. The ELT antenna could end up pointing directly down at, 
 and a few inches from, the surface of the earth. How much difference would a 
 perfect ground plane, if one could construct one, make in that situation?
 
 Here is my thinking:
 
 1) To be legal, buy one of the garden variety ELT's that we are mandated to 
 carry. Install it securely in the proper location in the proper attitude 
 with regard to its deceleration sensor. Fasten on the wire antenna that came 
 with the ELT and don't obsess over ground planes or what the antenna's 
 attitude will be when you finish crashing. Go fly.
 
 2) If you want to take some truly effective steps for rescue after crashing 
 you can, and probably should to the degree that you are concerned and 
 considering routes of flight, do some or all of the following.
 
 2A) Always carry a hand held VHF comm radio with a battery supply that you 
 KNOW to be capable of extended operation.
 
 2B) Always carry a cell phone with a battery supply that you KNOW to be 
 capable of extended operation.
 
 2C) Purchase and carry a PLB http://www.equipped.com/faq_plb/default.asp
 
 2D) Carry a tough plastic container of water -- size your choice. My 
 experience with even short time rescued people is that they experienced an 
 almost mentally debilitating thirst shortly after crashing.
 
 2E) Carry a knife of enough size and sturdiness to punch through / crack 
 your plastic windows and canopy.
 
 I am sure that other posters will add their favorite / essential crash 
 survival items, but obsessing over these items falls into the same category 
 of time wasting like obsessing over ground planes. Take what you deem to be 
 reasonable precautions to be rescued after a survivable crash and then 
 proceed to fly worry and guilt free (and legal).
 
 OC
 
 PS: If you have the bank account to afford one of the new 406 Mhz ELT's, go 
 for it.
 
 << hi all, I have several antennas to install. My elt requires a ground 
 plane. Tim at b and
 c was very helpful with my questions but i question leads to 5 more. Is 
 there
 any way around a ground plane for the elt? If not, any suggestions on how to
 make it in my wood/cloth fuselage? At first i thought numerous strips of 
 thin
 copper way the way to go but that looks like just more fasteners. Can a very
 thin sheet be laid down in the fuse. bottom? It wouldnt exactly be flat with
 all the woodworking to go around.....skip.....Thanks in advance, bob noffs>>
 
  |  | - The Matronics Avionics-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Avionics-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		ruebd(at)skymail.csus.edu Guest
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2006 9:04 am    Post subject: antennas | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				OC.  
 
 	Well, now on the topic of the Maple syrup that we should carry,
 even though my own preference would be for the genuine stuff, the
 imitation would be more practical due to storage considerations, now, of
 course, we know that refrigeration is required for the genuine after
 opening, and is even a good idea with the fake stuff, but who can
 guarantee that some hungry passenger, or pilot, would not have violated
 the seal and  had a taste before we had our emergency event.  Wow, these
 things do get complicated.  Good we have the Gummint working on this for
 us. 
 	On a serious vein, what is the advantage of the 406 Mhz ones, is
 it just the smaller dimensions needed for antenna and ground plane? Or
 is there some other factor involved?
 
 Duane Rueb, KF6GYB & PG-12-32627, also Kitfox N24ZM
 --
 
  |  | - The Matronics Avionics-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Avionics-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		wjrhamilton(at)optusnet.c Guest
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2006 7:01 pm    Post subject: antennas | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Folks,
 In Australia, legislation to mandate fixed ELT in all GA aircraft was 
 defeated in the Parliament, after a lobbying campaign by AOPA Australia.
 
 We do have legislation for the mandatory carriage of handheld 
 ELT/EPIRB ( your PLB) on all flights over 50 miles from base.
 
 The statistics are stark, in actual crash scenarios, the failure rate 
 of fixed ELT is around 95%.
 The most common cause of failure is the disruption of the antenna or 
 the aerial cable from the box to the antenna, for all the reasons you 
 can think of.
 
 Another common reason is that the aircraft is in the water , 100% of 
 ELT's do not work under water. Post accident fire, prior internal 
 failure etc, are common additional causes.
 
 In contrast, in survivable accidents, 100% of hand held ELT have 
 worked. In non-survivable accidents, all you are talking about is 
 saving search costs. Given what little information is available in 
 the US ( I did a lot of work jointly with the Civil Air Patrol on the 
 subject) the 95% + failure rate holds good in the US ---- As you 
 might expect, given the causes of failure are inherent in the 
 design/installation of fixed ELT.
 
 Remember that the US legislation to mandate ELT bypassed all the 
 usual consultation, cost benefit analysis etc, it was a knee jerk 
 political reaction to the loss of an aircraft in Alaska, I don't 
 recall if it was a Congressman or Senator that was lost. There is 
 absolutely NO evidence to show that the outcome of that accident 
 would have  been any different had the aircraft been fitted with an 
 ELT, statistically there was a better than 95% failure probability. 
 Given actual accident, the failure probability was closer to 100%.
 
 In view of phasing out the COSPAR/SARSAT on 121.5/243, in accord with 
 the latest specifications for new generation ELT, commodity priced 
 400 mcs GPS/ELT are now available.
 
 Interestingly, because of the low cost of an ELT, their use is 
 widespread, even Forest Service type organisations ( the name varies 
 state by state) rent ELT to hikers who do not have their own, most 4 
 Wheel Drivers carry one now, if they are in a remote area.
 
 In short, fixed ELT are a total waste on money.
 
 Even in three airline accidents ( all Airbus) that we could track 
 down, where the tail mounted ELT survived in-tact in a largely intact 
 tail section, all three ELT failed to transmit a useable signal.
 
 Cheers,
 Bill Hamilton.
 
 
 At 21:28 10/02/2006, you wrote:
  	  | Quote: | 	 		  
 
 Responding to an AeroElectric-List message previously posted by: "bob noffs"
 <icubob(at)newnorth.net>
 
 2/10/2006
 
 Hello Bob, Dare I post some heresy? Will the gummint sic its watch dogs on
 me? Will the electromagnetic radiation purists on the list rise up in total
 fury to slap me down? Well, I'll take a chance.
 
 Suppose that the gummint, in its infinite wisdom, mandated that every
 aircraft carry 3 pounds of butter and a container of maple syrup just in
 case the survival situation after crashing resulted in a supply of pancakes
 as the available food supply. Would you insist on carrying genuine maple
 syrup or would an imitation be good enough for you?
 
 Maybe an ELT is a little more useful than butter and maple syrup in a crash
 situation, but I sure as hell wouldn't place my entire faith in being found
 and rescued in one of the garden variety ELT's that we are mandated to
 carry. My point is that obsessing over antenna ground plane details is
 wasted time.
 
 Nobody knows exactly what attitude their aircraft will be in when it
 finishes crashing. The ELT antenna could end up pointing directly down at,
 and a few inches from, the surface of the earth. How much difference would a
 perfect ground plane, if one could construct one, make in that situation?
 
 Here is my thinking:
 
 1) To be legal, buy one of the garden variety ELT's that we are mandated to
 carry. Install it securely in the proper location in the proper attitude
 with regard to its deceleration sensor. Fasten on the wire antenna that came
 with the ELT and don't obsess over ground planes or what the antenna's
 attitude will be when you finish crashing. Go fly.
 
 2) If you want to take some truly effective steps for rescue after crashing
 you can, and probably should to the degree that you are concerned and
 considering routes of flight, do some or all of the following.
 
 2A) Always carry a hand held VHF comm radio with a battery supply that you
 KNOW to be capable of extended operation.
 
 2B) Always carry a cell phone with a battery supply that you KNOW to be
 capable of extended operation.
 
 2C) Purchase and carry a PLB http://www.equipped.com/faq_plb/default.asp
 
 2D) Carry a tough plastic container of water -- size your choice. My
 experience with even short time rescued people is that they experienced an
 almost mentally debilitating thirst shortly after crashing.
 
 2E) Carry a knife of enough size and sturdiness to punch through / crack
 your plastic windows and canopy.
 
 I am sure that other posters will add their favorite / essential crash
 survival items, but obsessing over these items falls into the same category
 of time wasting like obsessing over ground planes. Take what you deem to be
 reasonable precautions to be rescued after a survivable crash and then
 proceed to fly worry and guilt free (and legal).
 
 OC
 
 PS: If you have the bank account to afford one of the new 406 Mhz ELT's, go
 for it.
 
 << hi all, I have several antennas to install. My elt requires a ground
 plane. Tim at b and
 c was very helpful with my questions but i question leads to 5 more. Is
 there
 any way around a ground plane for the elt? If not, any suggestions on how to
 make it in my wood/cloth fuselage? At first i thought numerous strips of
 thin
 copper way the way to go but that looks like just more fasteners. Can a very
 thin sheet be laid down in the fuse. bottom? It wouldnt exactly be flat with
 all the woodworking to go around.....skip.....Thanks in advance, bob noffs>>
 
 
 
 | 	  
 
 CONFIDENTIALITY & PRIVILEGE NOTICE
 W.J.R.Hamilton,Glenalmond Group Companies,Fighter Flights Internet 
 Services and Warbirds.Net. & <wjrhamilton(at)optusnet.com.au>.
 This message is intended for and should only be used by the 
 addressee. It is confidential and may contain legally privileged 
 information.If you are not the intended recipient any use 
 distribution,disclosure or copying of this message is strictly 
 prohibited.Confidentiality and legal privilege attached to this 
 communication are not waived or lost by reason of the mistaken 
 delivery to you.If you have received this message in error, please 
 notify us immediately to:
   Australia 61 (0)408 876 526
 Dolores capitis non fero. Eos do.
 
  |  | - The Matronics Avionics-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Avionics-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		 | 
	 
 
  
	 
	    
	   | 
	
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
  | 
   
 
  
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
  
		 |