RV6-Archive.digest.vol-ad

September 28, 2003 - October 31, 2005



________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 28, 2003
Subject: [ Henry Hore ] : New Email List Photo Share Available!
From: Email List Photo Shares <pictures(at)matronics.com>
A new Email List Photo Share is available: Poster: Henry Hore <elsa-henry@darlor-watch.com> Subject: Rivet-gun double off-set holder for one hand operation. http://www.matronics.com/photoshare/elsa-henry@darlor-watch.com.09.28.2003/index.html o Main Photo Share Index http://www.matronics.com/photoshare o Submitting a Photo Share If you wish to submit a Photo Share of your own, please include the following information along with your email message and files: 1) Email List or Lists that they are related to: 2) Your Full Name: 3) Your Email Address: 4) One line Subject description: 5) Multi-line, multi-paragraph description of topic: 6) One-line Description of each photo or file: Email the information above and your files and photos to: pictures(at)matronics.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Jerry2DT(at)aol.com
Date: Sep 29, 2003
Subject: Fuel caps adjust
Fred... These caps are easily adjustable. There are two o-rings that can wear out, but they're cheap. To adjust, loosen the locknut, then rotate the lower threaded disc to loosen or tighten down the large O-ring. Proper adjustment is achieved when the cap is locked down and cannot be rotated by hand. I use a quarter stuck in the slot on top, and adjust until I cannot rotate. This seems to work....Don't forget to tighten the locknut after this process... Jerry Cochran > > Henry, > > Nice find.. My new caps aren't fitting tight enough either. Now I know I > need to take them apart and inspect them. It might not be a bad idea to add > this type of inspection to the conditional inspection list... > > Fred Stucklen > RV-6A N926RV 55 Hrs... > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Chuck Daus" <dauscj(at)nb.net>
Subject: Wing attachment
Date: Oct 01, 2003
Hello, I'm in the process of attaching the wings to the fuselage and need some assistance squaring up the wings. I followed the manner described in the manual using corresponding points on the fuselage measuring to common points on the wing tips and also measurements from the wing tips to the vertical stabilizer and seem to have some inconsistencies between the two of about a half inch. Could someone please offer their opinions as to the best way to square the wings to the fuselage/vert. stab. Thanks, Chuck Daus - Wings attach ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Re: Wing attachment
From: Chris.Kleen(at)faa.gov
Date: Oct 01, 2003
10/01/2003 09:38:02 AM Hi Chuck, I had more than my fair share trying (and crying) to get the wings attached properly. There are several points of concern here that need to be addressed, but the most important is the hole clearance to the rear spar, that 5/8" DO NOT OVERLOOKED! Please note the emphasis. Let me know if you have a 6 or 6A and we will work from there. Chris W. Kleen AWP 540.1 310 725-6541 Fax 6563 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Chuck Daus" <dauscj(at)nb.net>
Subject: Re: Wing attachment
Date: Oct 01, 2003
Chris, Thanks for the reply, I am building a 6A The one thing I know that is throwing one more factor into thought is I have the empange already installed. Right now I have the wings in line (dropping strings from the wing leading edge) and each side measures the same distance to the vert. stabilizer. However, when I measure to the points on the side of the fuselage they are off 3/4" to 1"from side to side. I also want to state that I am a machinist and engineer by trade and I realize that I can't make every point I measure be equal on each side. So, I ask myself what does really matter. I think no matter what the leading edge of the wings should be in line. Then what comes next or am I not even close??? I thank you for any information you can give to help me make the right points equal on each side. Chuck Daus ----- Original Message ----- From: <Chris.Kleen(at)faa.gov> Subject: Re: RV6-List: Wing attachment > > > Hi Chuck, > > I had more than my fair share trying (and crying) to get the wings > attached properly. There are several points of concern here that need to > be addressed, but the most important is the hole clearance to the rear > spar, that 5/8" DO NOT OVERLOOKED! Please note the emphasis. Let me know > if you have a 6 or 6A and we will work from there. > > > Chris W. Kleen > AWP 540.1 > 310 725-6541 > Fax 6563 > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jeff Orear" <jorear(at)new.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Wing attachment
Date: Oct 01, 2003
Hi Chuck: I have a friend that is an ex-USair captain. He told me about a 737 that was in for maintenance and upon doing routine work on the airplane, it was discovered that one wing was mounted 1 foot....yes 1 foot ahead of the other! In all the hundreds of hours the airplane was flown, no flight crew ever reported any problems with how the airplane flew. Don't get me wrong.....I am not saying that you can be sloppy with mounting the wings, but from the above it is apparent that there is a certain tolerance we can be within and still have a safe, stable airplane. FWIW Regards, Jeff Orear RV6A finish kit...slider frame actually slides! Peshtigo, WI ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chuck Daus" <dauscj(at)nb.net> Subject: Re: RV6-List: Wing attachment > > Chris, > > Thanks for the reply, I am building a 6A The one thing I know that is > throwing one more factor into thought is I have the empange already > installed. Right now I have the wings in line (dropping strings from the > wing leading edge) and each side measures the same distance to the vert. > stabilizer. However, when I measure to the points on the side of the > fuselage they are off 3/4" to 1"from side to side. I also want to state that > I am a machinist and engineer by trade and I realize that I can't make every > point I measure be equal on each side. So, I ask myself what does really > matter. I think no matter what the leading edge of the wings should be in > line. Then what comes next or am I not even close??? I thank you for any > information you can give to help me make the right points equal on each > side. > > Chuck Daus > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <Chris.Kleen(at)faa.gov> > To: > Subject: Re: RV6-List: Wing attachment > > > > > > > > Hi Chuck, > > > > I had more than my fair share trying (and crying) to get the wings > > attached properly. There are several points of concern here that need to > > be addressed, but the most important is the hole clearance to the rear > > spar, that 5/8" DO NOT OVERLOOKED! Please note the emphasis. Let me know > > if you have a 6 or 6A and we will work from there. > > > > > > Chris W. Kleen > > AWP 540.1 > > 310 725-6541 > > Fax 6563 > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: <avdub(at)mindspring.com>
Subject: Re: Wing attachment
Date: Oct 02, 2003
Chuck, I was in same fix with wing tips measuring up to 3/4 inch off one side to other from horizontal stabilizer tips. I was advised by Van's tech that the major concern is to get the wing leading edge correct using the method in manual. I did just that and the RV6A flies perfectly. For what it's worth I'd say focus on the wing and don't sweat the minor dimensional differences in the empennage. Dick -----Original Message----- From: Chuck Daus <dauscj(at)nb.net> Date: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 12:05 PM Subject: RV6-List: Wing attachment > >Hello, I'm in the process of attaching the wings to the fuselage and need some assistance squaring up the wings. I followed the manner described in the manual using corresponding points on the fuselage measuring to common points on the wing tips and also measurements from the wing tips to the vertical stabilizer and seem to have some inconsistencies between the two of about a half inch. Could someone please offer their opinions as to the best way to square the wings to the fuselage/vert. stab. > >Thanks, >Chuck Daus - Wings attach > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 02, 2003
Subject: Re: Wing attachment
From: Genev E Reed <genevreed(at)juno.com>
Chuck: It sounds to me like you have the wing leading edges in a straight line but you have one leading the other. pull them back until they are equal distance to the rear coners then check again. Doyle Reed 7A 101 Hrs. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 04, 2003
Subject: [ Jerry Calvert ] : New Email List Photo Share Available!
From: Email List Photo Shares <pictures(at)matronics.com>
A new Email List Photo Share is available: Poster: Jerry Calvert Subject: Oil Door http://www.matronics.com/photoshare/rv6@cox.net.10.04.2003/index.html o Main Photo Share Index http://www.matronics.com/photoshare o Submitting a Photo Share If you wish to submit a Photo Share of your own, please include the following information along with your email message and files: 1) Email List or Lists that they are related to: 2) Your Full Name: 3) Your Email Address: 4) One line Subject description: 5) Multi-line, multi-paragraph description of topic: 6) One-line Description of each photo or file: Email the information above and your files and photos to: pictures(at)matronics.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Mike Comeaux" <mcomeaux(at)bendnet.com>
Subject: EGT & CHT Probes
Date: Oct 10, 2003
Was wondering if anyone could help me out. I know 20/20 is hindsight but already have the westtech guages. This is what I have : New 0-360 from vans what port do you use for the CHT Sensor / Probe? High Country exhaust---Where is a good location for the bayonet type sensor with clamp for exhaust? Thanks in Advance....Mike Comeaux mcomeaux(at)bendnet.com Was wondering if anyone could help me out. I know 20/20 is hindsight but already have the westtech guages. This is what I have : New 0-360 from vans what port do you use for the CHT Sensor / Probe? High Country exhaust---Where is a good location for the bayonet type sensor with clamp for exhaust? Thanks in Advance....Mike Comeaux mcomeaux(at)bendnet.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "son hoang" <son(at)hoangs.com>
Subject: Re: EGT & CHT Probes
Date: Oct 10, 2003
i use #3 for CHT and #4 for EGT ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike Comeaux" <mcomeaux(at)bendnet.com> Subject: RV6-List: EGT & CHT Probes > > > Was wondering if anyone could help me out. > I know 20/20 is hindsight but already have the westtech > guages. This is what I have : > New 0-360 from vans what port do you use for the CHT Sensor / Probe? > > High Country exhaust---Where is a good location for the bayonet type > sensor with clamp for exhaust? > > Thanks in Advance....Mike Comeaux > mcomeaux(at)bendnet.com > > > > > > > > Was wondering if anyone could help me > out. > I know 20/20 is hindsight but already > have the > westtech > guages. This is what I have > : > New 0-360 from vans what port do you > use for the > CHT Sensor / Probe? > > High Country exhaust---Where is a good > location for > the bayonet type sensor with clamp for exhaust? > > Thanks in Advance....Mike > Comeaux >
href"mailto:mcomeaux(at)bendnet.com">mcomeaux(at)bendnet.com > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 12, 2003
From: Garey Wittich <gareywittich2000(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: MIL-T-43435B Lacing Cord at a 25% Cost Savings
rv8-list(at)matronics.com, rv9-list(at)matronics.com I have access to "Brand New" (in original packaging) MIL-T-43435B Lacing Cord, Type 2 (Polyester / Hi Temp), Finish C (Synthetic Rubber or Elastomer, NOT Waxed), Size 3 (50 lb min strength; 0.085" wide x 0.014" thick). This Cord is used extensively by avionic shops and airframe manufacturers to tie individual electrical wires into bundles for their avionics, etc. * Least expensive way to make wire bundles. * Will not cut into wires like Dental Floss used by some Builders, as it is "flat". * Higher Temp rating (-73 Deg C to 177 Deg C) than Type 1 (-55 Deg C to 121 Deg C) that is sold by Aircraft Spruce and Chief Aircraft for $21 per Spool. * Each Spool contains 500 yards of White or Blue Polyester Cord. (Share with other Builders.) * Excellent "Knot" retention. * See: www.versatileindustrial.com/gudebrod.html for additional info / pictures. * Will sell for $15 per Spool - includes shipping in the US. If interested E-Mail me off line at - gareywittich2000(at)yahoo.com Video Attachment Garey Wittich has sent you a video. Please go to
http://mediaframe.yahoo.com/mf/spotlife/o?.auth=J1X2HgMJ9RN8GSoUSNHJhA--&id= document.Compose.To.focus(); document.Compose.ATT.value = to view the video. __________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Gkb5577(at)aol.com
Date: Oct 15, 2003
Subject: Prop bolt
Does anyone know how much 'wallow' in the prop bolt holes is tolerable? Geoff ________________________________________________________________________________
From: <jwbrunk(at)attglobal.net>
Subject: Rivet guns
Date: Oct 15, 2003
I already looked in the archives and read all there is on drills and rivet guns. Some of it is a little dated, so I was curious about some particular items. Drills: Is there a minimum RPM you would look for? Is having the drill reversable something you would look for? Are the higer end drills (Sioux, etc) that much quieter and better running? As for rivet guns: To build a quick build kit, can I get by on the 2X for most of my needs? The archives vary in opinion on this as I'm sure some of you will. I don't want to spend a fortune on tools, BUT I would rather buy a better tool once, then buy several over the years. Looking for advice, Thanks in advance, John Brunke ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 15, 2003
From: Mark Phillips <ripsteel(at)edge.net>
Subject: Re: Rivet guns
FWIW, I gave up entirely on the air-powered drills about halfway through my first wing, realizing how much I was spending on compressed air (noise, wear on the machine and power) Went to rechargeable drill with two batteries & never looked back... After very close examination, I've never seen ANY less quality of them thar holes! As far as the rivet gun, a 2X will accomplish most any task short of boilerplate, but the neatest trick is a 1X I borrowed from a fellow builder with a back-rivet set- you will be astonished at how nice them skins look using this thing- It even earned a name: from the first time I ran a row of rivets with it, it became known as "Cats A$$"!! (Thanks, "person-who-loaneth tools"!) Happy pokin' & poundin'!! From The PossumWorks in TN Mark jwbrunk(at)attglobal.net wrote: > > I already looked in the archives and read all there is on drills and rivet guns. Some of it is a little dated, so I was curious > about some particular items. > > Drills: Is there a minimum RPM you would look for? > Is having the drill reversable something you would look for? > Are the higer end drills (Sioux, etc) that much quieter and better running? > > As for rivet guns: To build a quick build kit, can I get by on the 2X for most of my needs? The archives vary in opinion on this as I'm sure some of you will. > > I don't want to spend a fortune on tools, BUT I would rather buy a better tool once, then buy several over the years. > > Looking for advice, > Thanks in advance, > John Brunke > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Jerry2DT(at)aol.com
Date: Oct 16, 2003
Subject: "Wallow"
Geoff... If "wallow" is the same as "clearance", I'm no expert, but I would like mine to be zero.... In other words, a tight press fit. I'm sure someone will chime in on this that knows what they're saying. It'll be interesting if they allow any "wallow" at all. Jerry Cochran flying RV6a N254HL Building RV6a N180XP In a message dated 10/16/2003 12:02:22 AM Pacific Daylight Time, rv6-list-digest(at)matronics.com writes: > Does anyone know how much 'wallow' in the prop bolt holes is tolerable? > Geoff > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Dean Psiropoulos" <deanpsir(at)easystreet.com>
Subject: Re: rivet guns
Date: Oct 17, 2003
John: I have just finished doing 99% of the metal work on my RV-6A (all aluminum structures together and working on canopy install). I bought an Avery tool kit about 6 years ago when I started this thing and it was ONLY $1100.0 back then (now its about $1600). I used the included air drill somewhat but it uses a lot of air to run and I have one of those noisy oiless compressors so I got tired of listening to it, especially when drilling stuff like the 200 holes in the 1/8 inch thick longerons on the fuselage. For the most part I've used a 12 volt Dewalt battery drill that I got from Home Depot for $129.00 (it comes with two batteries and they charge fast enough for you never to run out of juice). I'm not all that excited about air drills but if ya got one go ahead and use it. If you have a good electric drill or battery drill they work just fine too. I've used a 2x rivet gun for almost everything. I turn the pressure way down (to around 40 PSI) when riveting skins and always use a swivel head rivet set on the gun (I've had good luck with this approach although I've found that one has to have the part held solidly and, when using the gun, brace yourself in a fashion that will keep the gun from slipping and hold it solidly against the work). A friend wanted to back rivet his wing skins so he made a large bucking bar (by putting handle on a large hunk of iron) and borrowed my offset back rivet tool. But we found that it was harder to get a nice shop head because the back rivet set is at an angle to the rivet. There are a few times when I have needed and used a 3X gun. This was in areas where I had to set rivets holding together 3/8 to 1/4 inch of metal (this is in areas where the fuselage longerons meet up with the steel weldments of the motor mounts and in the front area of the fuselage where there is lots of thick metal). The problem comes in when you don't get the rivet sufficiently driven on the first or second try, then it work hardens so much that a smaller gun doesn't have enough oomph (the surrounding thick metal absorbs too much of the guns energy instead of passing to the rivet). So you should get along just fine with a 2x gun, I run mine at 60 pounds for 1/8 inch rivets and 40 for skin rivets (for the thick metal I'll run it up to maximum and try to drive the rivet in one pass). Dean Psiropoulos RV-6A 24907 Finsh kit, canopy oh boy PS: I just noticed you said quick build, there should be no need for anything larger than the 2x for anything you do on a quick build. Happy building, when you get your QB kit you'll already be where it took me 5 years to get to by assembling the small parts. From: <jwbrunk(at)attglobal.net> Subject: RV6-List: Rivet guns I already looked in the archives and read all there is on drills and rivet guns. Some of it is a little dated, so I was curious about some particular items. Drills: Is there a minimum RPM you would look for? Is having the drill reversable something you would look for? Are the higer end drills (Sioux, etc) that much quieter and better running? As for rivet guns: To build a quick build kit, can I get by on the 2X for most of my needs? The archives vary in opinion on this as I'm sure some of you will. I don't want to spend a fortune on tools, BUT I would rather buy a better tool once, then buy several over the years. Looking for advice, Thanks in advance, John Brunke ________________________________________________________________________________
From: <jwbrunk(at)attglobal.net>
Subject: Tools
Date: Oct 17, 2003
Dear RV-listers, Thanks so much for the tool advice. You solved a lot of research on my part. John Brunke ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 24, 2003
From: Balone Marine <balone_99(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Rivet guns
I use a 3x, but i have been at it for 55 yrs. I would say a 2x is adequite.and yes you will get many opinions , Its basicly what you are familier with on the Quik Built the 2x is fine. bud balone __________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 30, 2003
From: Garey Wittich <gareywittich2000(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: 1/4" - 28 Threaded Shank Drill Bits / Scotch-Brite Wheels -
40% SAVINGS rv8-list(at)matronics.com, rv9-list(at)matronics.com FOR YOUR BUILDING NEEDS: 1) 1/4"-28 THREADED SHANK DRILL BITS, Size #40 NEW * Used with Angle Air Drills and Flexible Drill Attachments, etc. * NEW from Northrup / Grumman Aircraft Co. * 2 1/8" Long, 135 Degree Split Point, High Speed Steel * YOUR PRICE $1.50 each (Avery Part #4140, $2.70 each) 2) NAS907 Type B Drill Bits, Size #30 NEW * High Speed, Nitride Oxide coated for enhanced abrasion resistance * Recommended for Stainless Steel, hard Steel, Titanium, etc. * NEW from Northrup / Grumman Aircraft Co. * 135 degree Split Point * 2 3/4" long * YOUR PRICE $1.00 each 3) DEBURRING WHEEL (aka Scotch Brite Wheel) * NEW from Northrup / Grumman Aircraft Co. * Used to Radius, Deburr & Smooth edges on Aluminum parts using a Die Grinder, etc. * 7A Medium Grit, Aluminum Oxide (The "ONE" recommended by Van's Aircraft) * 1" dia x 1" high with 3/16" hole for Mandrel (Mandrel not supplied) * YOUR PRICE $3.25 each (Avery Part #3700, $5.00 each) Minimum Order $10.00 POSTAGE INCLUDED Indicate interest OFF LINE by E-Mail. Supplies Limited __________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 31, 2003
From: Matt Dralle <dralle(at)matronics.com>
Subject: All New Matronics Email List Online Chat!!!
Hi Listers! A number of Listers have been asking for some Matronics Email List online chat and NOW ITS HERE! Over the last couple of days I've set up a nifty web-based Chat site here on the Matronics systems. No special programs to download; all you need is a late model web browser like Internet Explorer or Netscape with a java plugin. I would recommend downloading the latest Java plugin if you experience any problems getting the page to come up. Here's a link to the Sun Java download website. http://java.com/en/index.jsp Look for the green box with the yellow arrow in the upper right corner. Before you bother, though, just try you browser because it'll probably just work. Each Email List on Matronics has its own "Room" and all rooms can easily be accessed from the same client. In the Email List URL Trailer at the bottom of each List message, you'll find the Link to this List's specific Chat Room. Just click on the Link, and then type in your name or email address in the User Name box. Try to use a name or email address that the other Listers know you by. You'll find me lurking around the various List chat rooms as "MattDralle". There's a couple of nifty features I'll explain right off. On the main Chat Window page after you login, you'll see a little icon with a Hammer and a Screwdriver. This is the Control Panel window. Once the Control Panel comes up, click on the "Settings" tab. Here you'll find, among other things, three check boxes to enable sound. Click all three and you'll be treated to a sound whenever someone enters or leaves the Room, or when someone sends a message. The other cool button is the one that has four little arrows pointing to each of the four corners of the button. This will rip the main Chat window from the web page and allow you to resize and move it anyway you'd like. Let's have some fun and get to know one another better using this awesome new Chat Room! To get started, just click the URL Link below for this List's specific Chat Room! Best regards, Matt Dralle Matronics Email List Admin PS - I'm working on a web link interface to the chat logfiles. Coming soon... ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 01, 2003
From: Matt Dralle <dralle(at)matronics.com>
Subject: 2003 List Fund Raiser - Please Support Your Lists...
Dear Listers, During November of each year, I have a voluntary Email List Fund Raiser to support the continued operation, development, maintenance and upgrade of the Email Forums sponsored here. Your Contributions go directly into improvements in the systems that support the Lists and to pay for the Internet connectivity primarily dedicated to supporting the Lists. The traffic on the Lists continues to grow and the numbers are nothing short of impressive! Here are some statistics that show how much traffic the Lists generated this year alone: * 11/01/2002 - 10/31/2003 o Web server hits: 10,446,780 (870,565/mo) o Incoming Email Posts: 58,918 (4,909/mo) List-related upgrades this year have been plentiful, and List performance has substantially improved as a result. Upgrades and enhancements this year have included: * Internet Connection upgrade to a full, commercial-grade T1 Line! * New Web Server platform - Dual 3Ghz Xeon with 2Gb Ram and U320 SCSI! * Upgrade of Email Server platform - Dual 1.7 Ghz Xeon with 1Gb Ram! * All new SPAM Filtering Appliance - filters about 98% of the unwanted SPAM! * All new, web-base List Chat Room society! As you can well imagine, this year's upgrades translate into a fair amount of cash outlay on my part and this annual List Fund Raiser is the sole means by which I fund these upgrades. Unlike most of the other "list servers" on the Web these days, I have a strict *no-commercial-advertisement policy* on the Matronics Lists and associated List web sites. I was again approached by a number of vendors recently with advertising deals that have been very tempting. My commitment to providing a grass-roots, non-commercial environment prevailed, however! Commercialism on the Internet seems to be increasing exponentially every year, with more and more SPAM and pop up ads, not to mention the ever increasing Virus attacks. My goal with the Matronics List Service is to provide all members with a commercial-free, virus-free, and high-performance system with which the may share information, ideas, and camaraderie. The best news this year is that, with the gracious help of Andy Gold and The Builder's Bookstore ( http://www.buildersbooks.com ), I have been able to significantly expand the lineup of fantastic Gift offers to support the List Fund Raiser! In all, there are eight awesome free gifts this year ranging from List Archive CD's to Flight Computers with qualifying Contribution levels. Those great Jeppesen Flight Bags that were so popular last year are even back! A special thanks goes out to Andy Gold again this year for his very kind and generous support of the Lists. Thanks Andy, for these great incentives!! Over the next month I'll be posting a few reminder messages about the List Fund Raiser, and I ask for your patience and understanding during the process. Remember that the Lists are *completely* funded through the generous Contributions of its members. That's it! There's no support from a bloated advertising budget or deep pockets somewhere. Its all made possible through YOUR thoughtful and generous support! To make your List Contribution using a Visa or MasterCard, PalPal, or with a personal check, please go to the URL link below. Here you can find additional details on this year's great free Gifts as well as information on the various methods of payment. Contributions in the $20, $30, $50, $75, and $100 range are common. The Contribution web page is kind of long this year with the details of each of the gifts, so please scroll all the way down! SSL Secure Contribution Web Site: http://www.matronics.com/contributions I would like to thank everyone who supports the Lists this year! Your Contributions truly make it all possible!! Thank you!! Matt Dralle Matronics Email List Administrator Matt G Dralle | Matronics | PO Box 347 | Livermore | CA | 94551 925-606-1001 V | 925-606-6281 F | dralle(at)matronics.com Email http://www.matronics.com/ WWW | Featuring Products For Aircraft ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 02, 2003
rv7-list(at)matronics.com, rv8-list(at)matronics.com, rv9-list(at)matronics.com, rv10-list(at)matronics.com, rvcanada-list(at)matronics.com, rveurope-list(at)matronics.com
From: Matt Dralle <dralle(at)matronics.com>
Subject: RVx-List vs. RV-List Subscriptions
Dear RV-x Listers, I was chatting with a nice fellow on the new Matronics RV6-List Chatroom yesterday ( http://www.matronics.com/chat ), and he ask me an interesting question. Basically, what he was saying was that he had been subscribed to the RV-List back a few years ago and he used to get a lot of messages each day. Recently, he resubscribed and now only gets a few messages. "What Happened?", he wanted to know... Long story short, originally he had subscribed to the non-model specific List, the "RV-List(at)matronics.com". When he resubscribed, he just subscribed to the model-specific List, the "RV6-List(at)matronics.com". Since the model-specific Lists receive far less traffic than the main RV-List, the mystery of his reduced content was solved. He's now subscribed to the Main RV-List in addition to the RV6-List and is happily receiving a few more messages each day. I realize that many of you have made a conscious decision to only subscribe to one or more of the model-specific Lists. This conversation did make me wonder, though, just how many people have subscribed to the model-specific Lists, not knowing that a lot of the RV dialog is really on the main RV-List...? Anyway, I thought I'd post a little message today and spread the word. I did some number crunching on the RVx-Lists vs. RV-List subscriptions and found that there are 819 unique people subscribed to one or more model-specific RVx-Lists but that are NOT subscribed to the general RV-List! That's a lot of people missing out on a main flow of RV information. I've setup a little web page where you can check to see if you're currently subscribed to the RV-List and easily subscribe if you're not! http://www.matronics.com/rv-list/Am-I-Subscribed.html The RV-List is where all the action is! Subscribe today! :-) Best regards, Matt Dralle Email List Admin. Matt G Dralle | Matronics | PO Box 347 | Livermore | CA | 94551 925-606-1001 V | 925-606-6281 F | dralle(at)matronics.com Email http://www.matronics.com/ WWW | Featuring Products For Aircraft ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 03, 2003
Subject: [ Barry Bruns ] : New Email List Photo Share Available!
From: Email List Photo Shares <pictures(at)matronics.com>
A new Email List Photo Share is available: Poster: Barry Bruns Subject: Wing jig http://www.matronics.com/photoshare/BBruns6831@aol.com.11.03.2003/index.html o Main Photo Share Index http://www.matronics.com/photoshare o Submitting a Photo Share If you wish to submit a Photo Share of your own, please include the following information along with your email message and files: 1) Email List or Lists that they are related to: 2) Your Full Name: 3) Your Email Address: 4) One line Subject description: 5) Multi-line, multi-paragraph description of topic: 6) One-line Description of each photo or file: Email the information above and your files and photos to: pictures(at)matronics.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 05, 2003
From: Matt Dralle <dralle(at)matronics.com>
Subject: List Fund Raiser - Wow, Have You Seen The Free Gifts?
Dear Listers, The List Fund Raiser is going well so far this year and I wanted to say "Thank You" to everyone that has made a Contribution already this year! Though the generous support of Andy Gold and the Builders Bookstore ( http://www.buildersbooks.com ), I'm able to offer some truly awesome gifts with qualifying Contributions this year. There's quite a line up and a rather diverse set of options - certainly something for every taste and personality. Here's a list of this year's fine options: * List Archive CD * Aircraft Builder's Log * Pilot Flashlight System * Pro Pilot Logbook * FAR/AIM on CD * Jeppesen Flight Bag * Aviation History Book * Techstar Flight Computer Please support your Email List Community AND pick up a really slick Gift at the same time! The SSL Secure Contribution web site can be found at the following URL: http://www.matronics.com/contributions Once again, I would like to thank everyone that has so generously supported the continued operation and upgrade of the Lists Services here on the Matronics servers!! Thank you! Matt Dralle Matronics Email List Administrator Matt G Dralle | Matronics | PO Box 347 | Livermore | CA | 94551 925-606-1001 V | 925-606-6281 F | dralle(at)matronics.com Email http://www.matronics.com/ WWW | Featuring Products For Aircraft ________________________________________________________________________________
From: CharlesRV6(at)aol.com
Date: Nov 05, 2003
Subject: Re: Stainless Steel Tape
You are much better off putting teflon tape UNDER the the trailing edge of the wing rather than on the top of the flaps. Works like a charm. Not a scratch. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Del Schneider" <del(at)deltech.ca>
Subject: Stainless Steel Tape
Date: Nov 05, 2003
I believe the tape is polyurethane and is available from Van's as a part number. The poly tape is clear and goes on over the paint. Looks good on mine and does not show the scuffing. C-GZVD -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv6-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv6-list-server(at)matronics.com]On Behalf Of CharlesRV6(at)aol.com Subject: Re: RV6-List: Stainless Steel Tape You are much better off putting teflon tape UNDER the the trailing edge of the wing rather than on the top of the flaps. Works like a charm. Not a scratch. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 07, 2003
From: Garey Wittich <gareywittich2000(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: A GUIDE TO AIRCRAFT PAINTING & CORROSION CONTROL
rv8-list(at)matronics.com, "rv9-list(at)matronics.com (1.9 points) SAVE YOURSELF hundreds of hours of research time and building time, by ordering the comprehensive "Guide to Painting & Corrosion Control of Aluminum and Composite Aircraft" This book took over 600+ hours of research time, by a fussy Builder. Contains 64 pages of the latest, practical information - summarized and gathered from MIL Standards, Paint Shops, Builders like you (what worked or didn't), Airframe Mfgs, etc. Covers Products (characteristics & application of) from PP&G, Dupont, Sherwin W'ms, Sterling, Poly Fiber, Deft, Randolph Paints, PRC De Soto, US Paints, Aircraft Finishing Systems, Tempo, 3M, etc. Some of the Topics covered in the 30 Sections are: * Aircraft Paints vs Auto Paints and Other Considerations * Corrosion Control * Spray Guns - selecting, adjusting, using and painting problems * Brushes / Rollers used with Primers & Paints * Prep Methods for Painting - Fiberglass, Steel and Aluminum * Epoxy Primers for Aluminum - MIL & Commercial, Solvent & Water Reducible * Primers for Fiberglass & Steel * Wash Primers & Self Etching Primers * Other Primers - Zinc Chromate,Zinc Oxide, Enamel * Paint Types: MIL & Non MIL Polyurethanes Enamel Types Acrylics - Lacquers & Enamels * Acid Etch / Conversion Coatings (Alodine) * Criteria for selecting a Paint Shop * 3M Cleaning Pads, Liquid Cleaners and their effectiveness * Paint Booths and their Construction * References - MIL Standards & Tech Orders * Directory of Aircraft Paint Mfgs, Distrib- utors, etc. E-Mail addresses, Phone Numbers, Application Notes YOUR AIRPLANE is judged by it's Paint Job and it is costly too, so have the latest "Information" in order to make good decisions. Contains plenty of "Do's" and "Don'ts" that save Time, Money and Frustration. Order today. Send a check for $25 to (includes Postage within the US) to: Garey Wittich 58 Village Parkway Santa Monica, CA. 90405 __________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 09, 2003
From: Garey Wittich <gareywittich2000(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: A GUIDE TO AIRCRAFT PAINTING & CORROSION CONTROL
rv8-list(at)matronics.com, rv9-list(at)matronics.com THIS IS NOT "SPAM", but from my research I did for my RV-8A which I am building. --------------- ------------- ------------ SAVE YOURSELF hundreds of hours of research time and building time, by using the comprehensive "Guide to Painting & Corrosion Control of Aluminum and Composite Aircraft" This book took over 600+ hours of research time by me, a fussy RV-8A Builder. Contains 64 pages of the latest, practical information - summarized and gathered from MIL Standards, Paint Shops, Builders like you (what worked or didn't), Airframe Mfgs, etc. Covers products from PP&G, Dupont, Sherwin W'ms, Sterling, Poly Fiber, Deft, Randolph Paints, PRC De Soto, US Paints, Aircraft Finishing Systems, 3M, etc. Some of the Topics covered in the 30 Sections are: * Aircraft Paints vs Auto Paints and Other Considerations * Corrosion Control * Spray Guns - selecting, adjusting, using and painting problems * Brushes / Rollers used with Primers & Paints * Prep Methods for Painting - Fiberglass, Steel and Aluminum * Epoxy Primers for Aluminum - MIL & Commercial, Solvent & Water Reducible * Primers for Fiberglass & Steel * Wash Primers & Self Etching Primers * Other Primers - Zinc Chromate,Zinc Oxide, Enamel * Paint Types: MIL & Non MIL Polyurethanes Enamel Types Acrylics - Lacquers & Enamels * Acid Etch / Conversion Coatings (Alodine) * Selecting a Paint Shop * 3M Cleaning Pads, Liquid Cleaner compatibility * Paint Booths and their Construction * References - MIL Standards & Tech Orders * Directory of Aircraft Paint Mfgs, Distrib- utors, etc. E-Mail addresses, phone numbers, Application Notes YOUR AIRPLANE is judged by it's Paint Job and it is costly too, so have the latest "Information" in order to make good decisions. Contains plenty of "Do's" and "Don'ts" that save time, money and frustration. Send a check for $25 to (includes Postage within the US) to: Garey Wittich RV-8A Builder 58 Village Parkway Santa Monica, CA. 90405 __________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 10, 2003
From: Matt Dralle <dralle(at)matronics.com>
Subject: WLAS...
Dear Listers, Below are some of the nice things people have been saying about the Lists in that little message box on the Contribution form! Thank you to everyone that has made a Contribution thus far and for all the great feedback! Please know that I really appreciate the comments and support!! If you haven't yet shown your support for these Lists, won't you take a moment and make your Contribution today? The Matronics Lists are always Commercial-Free, SPAM-Free, Virus-Free, and High-performance and its your direct support through this yearly Fund Raiser that enables all of these valuable services you've come to expect. Thank you for your Contribution!! SSL Secure Web Site - http://www.matronics.com/contribution Matt Dralle EMail List Administrator ================================================================ =================== What Listers Are Saying ==================== ================================================================ You provide a service to us kit builders that cannot be measured. -Clifford M. ...great service to the aviation community. -Curt R. Thanks for being there - your List has really been of help. -Thomas R. Your lists have been most helpful to my RV-9A project. -Dean V. ...has been a great help to me. -Jim N. ..."must-have" for RV builders and pilots. -Douglas W. I find something every day on the List that helps me in my project. -Ron P. ...very valuable! -Patrick L. Don't know that I could have persevered and succeeded without the List. -Curt R. ...service continues to be awesome and is one of the most helpful resources for homebuilding that I have ever found. -Jim H. The information and hours of entertainment many of us derive from the Lists is priceless. -Chris R. I learn a lot about my [aircraft] through the Lists... - Lee P. Great source of education and entertainment. Love it!!! -Lar B. Great List & very well organized. -Peter D. I couldn't build my [airplane] without this List. -William G. The List is an important part of my daily routine. -Roger H. ...incredible resource. -Ron P. Excellent facility. -David M. ...unmatched service to all builders and flyers. -Ralph C. Matt G Dralle | Matronics | PO Box 347 | Livermore | CA | 94551 925-606-1001 V | 925-606-6281 F | dralle(at)matronics.com Email http://www.matronics.com/ WWW | Featuring Products For Aircraft ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 14, 2003
From: Matt Dralle <dralle(at)matronics.com>
Subject: [PLEASE READ] - Why Do I Have A Fund Raiser Each Year?
Dear Listers, I was thinking that perhaps I should explain why I have a Fund Raiser and also take the opportunity to express why I think the List Services here provide a far better experience than the commercial equivalents. I use the List Fund Raiser each year to offset the costs involved with running a high performance email list site such as this one. With the annual support from the List members through the PBS-like Fund Raiser, I have found I can run the entire site without having to inflect any of the members with those annoying banner ads flashing up all the time trying to sell Toner Cartridge Refills or other garbage nobody wants or needs. From the comments I've received over the years regarding the Lists, the great majority of the members really appreciate the non-commercialism of my List systems and don't mind my 'go-team-go' banter once a year to encourage members to support the Lists. I believe that the Lists services that I provide here offer a great many benefits over the commercial equivalents in a number of ways. The first feature I believe to be particularly significant is that you *cannot* receive a computer v*rus from any of my Lists directly. I've been on a few other List servers and have been unfortunate enough to download infected files people have innocently or not-so-innocently included with their posts. This just can't happen with my Lists; each incoming message is filtered and attachments stripped off prior to posting. I provide a Photo and File Share feature that allows members to share files and bitmaps with other members and everyone can be assured that these files will be prescanned for any sort of v*rus before they are posted. Safe and simple. Also, with this photo and file sharing technique, the Archives don't get loaded up with a huge amounts of bitmap "data" that slows the Archive Search times. Another feature of this system is the extensive List Archives that are available for download, browsing, and searching. The Archives go all the way back to the very beginning of each List and with the super fast Search Engine, the huge size of the Archives is a non-issue in quickly finding the data you're looking for. Another feature of the Archives, in my opinion, is that they have been primarily stripped of all the useless email header data and all the other header garbage that seems to build up in a typical email thread. I have received an extremely positive response from Listers regarding the List Browse feature and the consensus is that the format and ease of use is outstanding. Members report that having the previous 7 days worth of messages on line for easy browsing and sorting is hugely beneficial. And again, as with the real time distribution of List email, the messages are stripped of all the unnecessary email headers and potentially dangerous v*ruses. I've been running email Lists and services under the matronics.com domain since about 1989 starting with RV-List and 30 guys who I knew and who where also building RVs. It has grown into over 40 different aviation-related Email Lists and an associated web site that receives over 10,000,000 hits each year!! Additionally, the List email system forwards well over 90,000,000 (yes, that 90 MILLION) email messages to subscribers each year! With all the dot.bombs these days, I think there's a lot of value in supporting a service that has gone the long haul and is still providing and improving a high quality service at a price that's nearly free. I have to admit running these Lists is a labor of love and I hope it shows in the quality of the experience that you receive when you get a List Email Message, Search the Archives, or use the List Browser. The Lists will be here for a long time to come. If you just want to lurk a while for free, that's great and I encourage you to do so. If you use, appreciate, and receive value from these Lists, then please support them during the Annual List Fund Raiser! ----------------------------------------------- The SSL Secure Web Site: http://www.matronics.com/contribution ----------------------------------------------- Thank you, Matt Dralle Email List Administrator ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Dean Psiropoulos" <deanpsir(at)easystreet.com>
Subject: Brake cylinders
Date: Nov 16, 2003
Ok here's an off-the-wall one: I'm ready to install my rudder pedals and want to install brake pedals and master cylinders at the same time. So.I'm looking at the whole contraption and realized that...if I drill holes in each brake pedal (where the master cylinders bolt to) like it says in Van's plans..two of the brake pedals will end up approximately parallel with the rudder tubes and two will end up angled forward toward the firewall a bit. In other words, both pedals on each side will not be positioned the same relative to the foot. So.I will have to rotate the ball of one foot further forward to get equal braking on both sides. Maybe this is not a big deal and you get used to it quickly but, since I haven't drilled the brake pedals for the master cylinders yet, I thought I'd ask. So.is there a special procedure I should use to figure out where to drill these holes or should I go ahead and drill them at the location shown on the plans. Thanks. Dean Psiropoulos RV-6A Canopy time.oh boy. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Stein Bruch" <stein(at)steinair.com>
Subject: Brake cylinders
Date: Nov 16, 2003
Hi Dean, Here's the simple answer. Line the bottom of both rudder pedals weldments up as if they were installed in the airplane, then line all the brake pedals themselves up so they are aligned, then drill. This way you'll end up with both/all pedals being equal. One more thing, it's advantageous (at least in the TD's) to have the tops of the brake pedals slightly forward instead of perfectly vertical, so if/when you are doing the pedal dance you aren't accidentally pushing on the brakes! Cheers, Stein Bruch RV6's, Minneapolis http://www.steinair.com -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv6-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv6-list-server(at)matronics.com]On Behalf Of Dean Psiropoulos Subject: RV6-List: Brake cylinders Ok here's an off-the-wall one: I'm ready to install my rudder pedals and want to install brake pedals and master cylinders at the same time. So.I'm looking at the whole contraption and realized that...if I drill holes in each brake pedal (where the master cylinders bolt to) like it says in Van's plans..two of the brake pedals will end up approximately parallel with the rudder tubes and two will end up angled forward toward the firewall a bit. In other words, both pedals on each side will not be positioned the same relative to the foot. So.I will have to rotate the ball of one foot further forward to get equal braking on both sides. Maybe this is not a big deal and you get used to it quickly but, since I haven't drilled the brake pedals for the master cylinders yet, I thought I'd ask. So.is there a special procedure I should use to figure out where to drill these holes or should I go ahead and drill them at the location shown on the plans. Thanks. Dean Psiropoulos RV-6A Canopy time.oh boy. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Lyle Peterson" <lyleap(at)access4less.net>
Subject: Rivets and rivet guns, etc.
Date: Nov 17, 2003
I am in the process of setting up to start on an RV6. It is a very slow build kit. I would appreciate some advice on rivet tools. What rivet gun seems to be the best all around as far as versatility and longevity? Which seems to have the best trigger? Is a 1X enough? Is 3X too much? What rivet sets are the most useful and which are useful in some limited uses? Long sets, offset sets, C frame sets, swivel sets, cushioned sets. Any other accessory that any of you found useful or would have liked to have to make setting a particular rivet easier? What size yokes are useful or needed in some locations on a pneumatic rivet squeezer or on a hand rivet squeezer? I apologize if you get several copies of this message. I am subscribed to several RV lists. Thank all of you for the information and encouragement. Lyle Peterson ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Lyle Peterson" <lyleap(at)access4less.net>
, ,
Subject: No subject as you will give it a new one shortly after you flame
me
Date: Nov 18, 2003
SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS It is so disheartening to learn that aviators are so narrow minded and selfish. If you people had used one tenth of the energy you expended on blasting my question to providing useful information, you could have written a book. As is it you only demonstrated that you 1. Don't know the answers, 2. Think that your knowledge is so unique that it can't be shared, 3. You have an immense amount of time to waste, 4. You have absolutely no respect for other people, whether they be builders or not. Someone suggested that the question was 'stupid.' The only stupid question is one that you can't answer! I checked the archives for the "gazillion" answers to be found there. I found four and not all of them pertained directly to my question. None of them covered all the questions I had posed. A few responded off list. They probably did not want to be caught by the lords of the list giving information to a new builder. I do thank those few for the information they so generously shared. They are very unlike the rest of the listers. Some two thousand people on these lists and only a very few are willing to answer. Rather, several find the time to waste flaming the questioner. The thread continues under the guise of a 'Food Fight.' How charming! So many messages use an existing subject because so few of you have figured out how to start a new thread on the list. Shame, shame. Look at the bottom of the message for the information you need. You don't even have to ask a question of the list, and thus get flamed for a stupid question. I did envision one day flying it to Oshkosh. If I do, which is doubtful, I will park it in the Vintage area. There are some folks there that will talk decently to you about airplanes and lots of other things. If you get too many copies of this email, use the delete key. Thanks for nothing, Lyle Peterson ________________________________________________________________________________
From: GRGSCHMIDT(at)aol.com
Date: Nov 18, 2003
Subject: N250GS Flew first flight
Dear elite members of this list, I would like to proudly announce that I flew RV6S (very slow build version) Sunday morning in perfect weather at the Phoenix, AZ Deer Valley airport. Some particulars are as follows: RV6S= Conventional gear (The S is for special or Schmidt whichever you prefer) IFR equipped Garmin GNC-250XL King KNS-80 Terra Comm Terra Xpdr Dual encoders RMI engine monitor (four cyl EGT/CHT) RMI Micro encoder PS Engineering PMA 6000 stereo audio control panel Collins HSI Precise Flight speed brakes Electric aileron and elevator trim Aviat inverted oil system Aviat fuel selctor/hand pump Lycoming IO-360 B1B 180 HP engine Custom four into one exhaust Whelen strobes and Red Rotating beacon. Five point quick release harness system Leather interior Upper rear baggage compartment with locking door. Slider Canopy Too Many other extras to mention here. She flew flawlessly and was in trim. Greg Schmidt N250GS RV6S Phoenix DVT Flying ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Chris Krieg <rv6a(at)mac.com>
Subject: Re: N250GS Flew first flight
Date: Nov 18, 2003
Congrats from down in Chandler! Question for you. How did your weight and balance work out? I asked Van's about installing an engine similar in weight to the IO-360 and they told me that the IO-360 was too heavy of an engine for the -6 and that it wasn't designed for that weight. Any problems with W&B on your -6? Chris On Nov 18, 2003, at 6:19 AM, GRGSCHMIDT(at)aol.com wrote: > > Dear elite members of this list, > > I would like to proudly announce that I flew RV6S (very slow build > version) > Sunday morning in perfect weather at the Phoenix, AZ Deer Valley > airport. Some > particulars are as follows: > RV6S= Conventional gear (The S is for special or Schmidt whichever you > prefer) > IFR equipped > Garmin GNC-250XL > King KNS-80 > Terra Comm > Terra Xpdr > Dual encoders > RMI engine monitor (four cyl EGT/CHT) > RMI Micro encoder > PS Engineering PMA 6000 stereo audio control panel > Collins HSI > Precise Flight speed brakes > Electric aileron and elevator trim > Aviat inverted oil system > Aviat fuel selctor/hand pump > Lycoming IO-360 B1B 180 HP engine > Custom four into one exhaust > Whelen strobes and Red Rotating beacon. > Five point quick release harness system > Leather interior > Upper rear baggage compartment with locking door. > Slider Canopy > > Too Many other extras to mention here. > She flew flawlessly and was in trim. > > > Greg Schmidt > N250GS RV6S > Phoenix DVT > Flying > > > _- > ======================================================================= > _-> _- > ======================================================================= > _- > ======================================================================= > _- > ======================================================================= > _- > ======================================================================= > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Heiglesias(at)cs.com
Date: Nov 18, 2003
Subject: Re: N250GS Flew first flight
Chris: I recently completed a RV6 in Houston with a O-360 A1A and a Sensenich metal fixed prop and the W & B came out just fine. I was told that RV6's generally had a tendency to be tail heavy so a little extra weight in the nose did not hurt. That was my case. My empty weight was 1039 lbs and even with low fuel and two people, I can still carry 60 lbs of baggage in the back. I don't think I am an exception. Regards, Eduardo Iglesias N23EJ - RV6 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Imfairings(at)aol.com
Date: Nov 18, 2003
Subject: Re: N250GS Flew first flight
Congratulations Greg on your first flight. I bet you have a smile that's a mile wide. I'm located close to the Glendale Airport...hope to see you and your RV someday. Bob Fairings-Etc ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 18, 2003
From: Doyal R Plute <dplute(at)sbcglobal.net>
Subject: Landing Lights.
I have just finished installing my wing tip lights from RDS lighting. A very good set of lights, however pricey! What procedure has been used to aim the lights to get the light pattern needed for landing and runway lighting? I propose to use one light pointed for landing and the other for runway lighting, ( good idea or not?) Is there a simple way of calibrating lights while on the ground, like auto headlamps where you shine lights at a wall and measure up so far for correct lighting? I have also connected an alternating flasher system for increased recognition. Any help will be appreciated, as I know anyone with lights has to have done this Doyal R. Plute N246DP ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Heiglesias(at)cs.com
Date: Nov 19, 2003
Subject: Re: Landing Lights.
Doyal: I completed my RV6 in June 03 I had the same question as you do now. From my prior night flight experience plus the advise of a close friend that has many ours as a pro in night flying this is what I did. You need the lights to point down some what into the runway. Not far ahead, this is useless. In order to have a feeling for third dimensional depth perception you need to see the ground close by. If not take a look at how the landing lights are aimed in a 737. What I did is to aim the lights so they are almost parallel to the ground when the aircraft is in a 3 point position. I actually aimed the lights slightly down in this position. If you can imagine (put a string) on the chord line of the wing tip, the light should have an angle of at least 15 deg down respect to the chord line of the wing. I use two (one in each wing tip) GE 100Watt halogen sealed beams, p/n GE-Q4509. I get them from Aircraft Spruce ($24.95 ea.) Great candlepower and narrower beam. The first time I installed them they were too high. I had to re position them. I forget now what the exact angle is from 3 point position to flying position. I seem to remember it is close to 15 deg. But you can measure it in your airplane. Regards, Eduardo Iglesias N23EJ -RV6 Houston, TX ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 21, 2003
From: Balone Marine <balone_99(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Rivets and rivet guns, etc.
I used a 3x For my RV6 , but would suggest a 2x, most people that have never Rivited before urs it , it is easyer to handle. I used a flush set with a rubber gaurd around it , But then I have had it for 40 yr,s . you may want one without the rubber . Bud, N663RV, tail dragger, slider. __________________________________ Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now http://companion.yahoo.com/ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Noel & Yoshie Simmons" <noel(at)blueskyaviation.net>
Subject: first flight
Date: Nov 22, 2003
First flight RV-6A SN# 24654 N#136DK Love my Van's!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Now to finsh My -8A then the -10. Sincerely, Noel Simmons Blue Sky Aviation, Inc. Phone & Fax: 406-538-6574 noel(at)blueskyaviation.net www.blueskyaviation.net ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Sam Mourning" <sammourning(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Looking for Ted Gauthier
Date: Nov 23, 2003
Does anybody have an email address or other contact info for Ted Gauthier? I have a question for him on another of his experimental projects. Thanks. Sam Mourning sammourning AT earthlink.net www.rv-9a.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Peter Dugdale" <dugdale(at)voyager.net>
Subject: Re: Looking for Ted Gauthier
Date: Nov 23, 2003
Sam Yes tgauthier(at)comcast.net Peter -----Original Message----- From: Sam Mourning <sammourning(at)earthlink.net> Date: Sunday, November 23, 2003 12:03 PM Subject: RV6-List: Looking for Ted Gauthier > >Does anybody have an email address or other contact info for Ted Gauthier? > >I have a question for him on another of his experimental projects. > >Thanks. > >Sam Mourning >sammourning AT earthlink.net >www.rv-9a.com > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Dean Psiropoulos" <deanpsir(at)easystreet.com>
Subject: Fitting torque.
Date: Nov 24, 2003
Hi all: Having just installed my brake fittings and lines and fuel vent fittings, I'm suddenly faced with a dilemma. How to torque these fittings and how much to torque them. Note: I checked the archives and found reference to a web site that supposedly has torque specs etc. but I could NOT get my browser to open the site. Is there someone out there with the answers that could email them to the list? I assume the nylon fittings on the low pressure side of the brake system are just put in finger tight then turned a certain amount further as plastic makes a good seal without needing a wrench. I put mine in until there was some resistance and then turned the fitting to its final position. I did NOT use a wrench on these, I just turned them until there was a good bit of resistance to me turning them by hand but was still able to move them using some muscle. Is there a proper procedure for this? If you tell me to put it in finger tight please provide the definition of "finger tight"! I'm afraid I'll brake the fitting if I tighten it so tight that I need a wrench to turn it. Also should I use any sealer or fuel lube on these? Also what about the little nylon caps that the nylon lines run through into the nylon fitting, what procedure and how much should these be tightend? And lastly, is this nylon lines idea too cheesy? Has anyone had people crawl in their airplane and put their feet on these fittings and lines and damage them? Should I scrap the whole thing and use aeroquip flexible or some other such robust lines? Same question on the brass elbows used in the brake system. The archives said to put some fuel lube or sealer on them to prevent leaks. I'm curious how many people have had leaking problems with these fittings as I found several folks on the archives mention this? I just tightened the brass fittings to their desired position after not being able to turn them by hand any more and I didn't use fuel lube or sealer, should I take them out and apply sealer? Is there a preferred method for torqueing these things (ie. Torque wrench and torque specs) or just finger tight then wrenched into final position? And lastly what about the AN aluminum elbows, unions etc that we use for fuel and vent lines. What's the proper method for torqueing these? Do you use a torque wrench and crow's foot and if so how do you compensate for the higher lever arm introduced with the crow's foot (or is it so small you don't bother)? What are the torque specs for these? Note that there are two issues here: one is the procedure and amount of torque for the FLARE nuts that clamp the tubing ends to the nipples of the fittings and the other is the torque and procedure for the regular style NUTS that hold the (union, elbow, tee, etc) fittings into the bulkheads. Thanks for the info. Dean Psiropoulos RV-6A canopy, yee ha ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Stein Bruch" <stein(at)steinair.com>
Subject: Fitting torque.
Date: Nov 24, 2003
Well practiced method...tighten them until they don't leak!! The Van's recommended setup works just fine with the equipment supplied in the kit. Personally, I wouldn't waste the time trying to use a crows foot and torque wrench on fluid fittings, a well calibrated elbow works just perfect! Cheers, Stein Bruch RV6's, Minneapolis http://www.steinair.com -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv6-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv6-list-server(at)matronics.com]On Behalf Of Dean Psiropoulos Subject: RV6-List: Fitting torque. Hi all: Having just installed my brake fittings and lines and fuel vent fittings, I'm suddenly faced with a dilemma. How to torque these fittings and how much to torque them. Note: I checked the archives and found reference to a web site that supposedly has torque specs etc. but I could NOT get my browser to open the site. Is there someone out there with the answers that could email them to the list? I assume the nylon fittings on the low pressure side of the brake system are just put in finger tight then turned a certain amount further as plastic makes a good seal without needing a wrench. I put mine in until there was some resistance and then turned the fitting to its final position. I did NOT use a wrench on these, I just turned them until there was a good bit of resistance to me turning them by hand but was still able to move them using some muscle. Is there a proper procedure for this? If you tell me to put it in finger tight please provide the definition of "finger tight"! I'm afraid I'll brake the fitting if I tighten it so tight that I need a wrench to turn it. Also should I use any sealer or fuel lube on these? Also what about the little nylon caps that the nylon lines run through into the nylon fitting, what procedure and how much should these be tightend? And lastly, is this nylon lines idea too cheesy? Has anyone had people crawl in their airplane and put their feet on these fittings and lines and damage them? Should I scrap the whole thing and use aeroquip flexible or some other such robust lines? Same question on the brass elbows used in the brake system. The archives said to put some fuel lube or sealer on them to prevent leaks. I'm curious how many people have had leaking problems with these fittings as I found several folks on the archives mention this? I just tightened the brass fittings to their desired position after not being able to turn them by hand any more and I didn't use fuel lube or sealer, should I take them out and apply sealer? Is there a preferred method for torqueing these things (ie. Torque wrench and torque specs) or just finger tight then wrenched into final position? And lastly what about the AN aluminum elbows, unions etc that we use for fuel and vent lines. What's the proper method for torqueing these? Do you use a torque wrench and crow's foot and if so how do you compensate for the higher lever arm introduced with the crow's foot (or is it so small you don't bother)? What are the torque specs for these? Note that there are two issues here: one is the procedure and amount of torque for the FLARE nuts that clamp the tubing ends to the nipples of the fittings and the other is the torque and procedure for the regular style NUTS that hold the (union, elbow, tee, etc) fittings into the bulkheads. Thanks for the info. Dean Psiropoulos RV-6A canopy, yee ha ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Dean Psiropoulos" <deanpsir(at)easystreet.com>
Subject: Bolt torques.
Date: Nov 24, 2003
I just installed the rudder pedals for the last time (I hope). So..I torqued the AN3 bolts to 25 inch pounds per spec. This squeezes the plastic bearing blocks quite a bit and you can see a visible deflection. Should I tighten bolts holding these plastic bearing blocks to the same torque specs as bolts holding metal parts together or is there a different procedure? If so what is the proper way to do this? Also do I need to put a washer between the head of the bolt and the plastic block? Van's plans don't seem to show any (just a washer under the nut) but then again when you get this far the RV-6 plans get a little sparse on info and one is left to either guess how things go or talk to those who've gone before them! Another question in the same vein concerns bolts holding the aileron and elevator bellcranks in place. These bellcranks have aluminum spacers between the structure and washers on either side of the bearing. When I tried to torque the quarter inch bolt on the elevator bellcrank to the specified 70 inch pounds, it looked like the bolt was beginning to flex so I backed it off. What is the proper torque and procedures for tightening these bolts? I haven't seen any information about how to properly tighten these assemblies. Thanks. Dean Psiropoulos RV-6A Canopy, oh boy ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 24, 2003
From: "Phil Sisson, Litchfield Aerobatic Club" <sisson(at)consolidated.net>
Rv8-List" , Rv7-List
Subject: Re: AK 450 ELT
Hey Stein, I got the order from you today, Great service and great prices. I have the Coax installed and the Xpndr checed out OK.. Hoping to have the uhmw tape on in a couple of weeks......... Phil ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Peter Dugdale" <dugdale(at)voyager.net>
Subject: Tracy Sayler's info
Date: Nov 25, 2003
Hello Does anyone have Tracy Sayler's email address or phone number? Thanks Peter ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 28, 2003
From: Matt Dralle <dralle(at)matronics.com>
Subject: What Listers Are Saying III
________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Mike Comeaux" <mcomeaux(at)bendnet.com>
Subject: Baffling
Date: Nov 28, 2003
I'm getting baffled on baffeling any good web sites or instructions on how to trim to cowling? Regards Mike Comeaux mcomeaux(at)bendnet.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: d.meloche(at)att.net
Subject: Re: Baffling
Date: Nov 30, 2003
i found that measuring the distance between the baffles and the bottom of the cowling was virtually impossible. after some thinking i came up with a method that worked quite well. i went to staples and bought a couple of packages of refrigerator magnets. i then cut some lengths of steel strapping about 1.5" long (i used some leftover stuff from vans crating). the baffling has to be trimmed far enough that the cowling doesn't touch. then place the magnet on one side of the aluminum baffling and the steel strapping on the other side, held in place with the magnet, protruding above the baffling edge. do this every few inches around the baffling. place the cowling on and the cowling will push the protruding straps down. remove the cowling and measure the distance from the top of each strap to the top of the cowling. this is your clearance. trim as required. works great! doug meloche rv6 > > I'm getting baffled on baffeling any good web sites or instructions on how to > trim to cowling? > Regards Mike Comeaux > mcomeaux(at)bendnet.com > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Cy Galley" <cgalley(at)QCBC.ORG>
, , , ,
Subject: Fw: pneumatic rivet squeezer
Date: Dec 14, 2003
SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS > > I have pneumatic rivet squeezer on eBay. > > > > http://tinyurl.com/y6ih > > > > Thanks. > > > > Dave DeWinter > > Former RV6 builder and owner ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 03, 2004
Subject: [ Ken Brooks ] : New Email List Photo Share Available!
From: Email List Photo Shares <pictures(at)matronics.com>
A new Email List Photo Share is available: Poster: Ken Brooks Subject: Whirlwind 151-series Propeller Installation http://www.matronics.com/photoshare/kenbrooks@charter.net.01.03.2004/index.html o Main Photo Share Index http://www.matronics.com/photoshare o Submitting a Photo Share If you wish to submit a Photo Share of your own, please include the following information along with your email message and files: 1) Email List or Lists that they are related to: 2) Your Full Name: 3) Your Email Address: 4) One line Subject description: 5) Multi-line, multi-paragraph description of topic: 6) One-line Description of each photo or file: Email the information above and your files and photos to: pictures(at)matronics.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "C. Rabaut" <crabaut(at)coalinga.com>
, , , "" ,
Subject: I made a donation & I'm registering as a Marrow donor
Date: Jan 05, 2004
Okay Guys (and Gals), Donating was the EASY part (you can do it too, it will only hurt when my wife aka "my banker" finds out). I also did some soul searching, cuz' it's gonna take a lot of time & traveling, but I decided I'm gonna be tested as a donor. I just registered and now I wait to get an appointment to be tested. I gotta go up to Stanford Medical Center (it's the closest donor center to me) and I'll let you all know how it goes. I hope some other folks will consider taking the plunge, either donating $ or becoming a blood/marrow donor or both... ya'll know it's for good/deserving people. check out http://www.marrow.org/HELP/join_the_registry.html or www.transplants.org Take Care and Take Air my friends, Chuck ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Paul Pflimlin" <pablo(at)phonewave.net>
, , , ,
Subject: Re: RV7-List: I made a donation & I'm registering as a Marrow
donor
Date: Jan 06, 2004
In the interest of elimlinating SPAM, what the hell does this msg. got to do with RV's?? ----- Original Message ----- From: "C. Rabaut" <crabaut(at)coalinga.com> ; ; ; "" ; Subject: RV7-List: I made a donation & I'm registering as a Marrow donor > --> RV7-List message posted by: "C. Rabaut" > > Okay Guys (and Gals), > > Donating was the EASY part (you can do it too, it will only hurt when my wife aka "my banker" finds out). I also did some soul searching, cuz' it's gonna take a lot of time & traveling, but I decided I'm gonna be tested as a donor. I just registered and now I wait to get an appointment to be tested. I gotta go up to Stanford Medical Center (it's the closest donor center to me) and I'll let you all know how it goes. > > I hope some other folks will consider taking the plunge, either donating $ or becoming a blood/marrow donor or both... ya'll know it's for good/deserving people. > > check out > > http://www.marrow.org/HELP/join_the_registry.html > > or > www.transplants.org > > > Take Care and Take Air my friends, > > Chuck > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Noel & Yoshie Simmons" <noel(at)blueskyaviation.net>
"Rv9-List(at)Matronics. Com" , "Rv-List(at)Matronics. Com" , "rvyahoo" , "Rv7-List(at)Matronics. Com" , "Rv6-List(at)Matronics. Com"
Subject: project
Date: Jan 16, 2004
List, Have cash! I am looking for a good airframe or project that has been meticulously built. Does not mater were the setter wheel is preferably a 6 or higher airframe. Please respond with email. Sincerely, Noel Simmons Blue Sky Aviation, Inc. Phone & Fax: 406-538-6574 noel(at)blueskyaviation.net www.blueskyaviation.net ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Dean Psiropoulos" <deanpsir(at)easystreet.com>
Subject: RV-6 wings on RV-4
Date: Jan 21, 2004
Actually Chuck: If I recall this correctly, the spar bolt pattern on the RV-4 is the same as on a -6, it's the root ribs that are moved further out to make room for the side by side fuselage (5 ribs close together at -6 wing root versus 3 ribs on the -4). So...you could install the -6 wings into the fuselage of the -4 and it should bolt right up at the main spars. The issues you'll have to deal with will be 1) filling the large gap between the fuselage and the root ribs and 2)extending the rear spar mounting brackets at the fuselage to meet the spar root (or alternatively extending the rear spar to meet the RV-4 mounting brackets). Probably could be done but it's NON trivial (should be filled with ribs and skin to strengthen the area), especially if you want to use the airplane for aerobatics (you need all the strength you can get at the wing root when you're pulling lots of Gs). If you have un-drilled spars it would be better to cut them off so the wing fits properly. The only problem with this (and with cutting off a set of predrilled spars) is getting them drilled to the fuselage carry through structure AND you'll end up with a wingspan that's a foot shorter than the plans (increases your stall speed a few MPH). But, the -6 does have larger fuel capacity than the RV-4. Regards, Dean Psiropoulos RV-6A, old canopy frame headaches From: "C. Rabaut" <crabaut(at)coalinga.com> Subject: RV6-List: Can the RV-6 wings be mated to an RV-4 fuselage ??? Okay Guys & Gals, Here's the 24 thousand dollar question... Can a set of RV-6 wings be mated to an RV-4 fuselage ? If so, what differences and/or changes must be made to accommodate said cross-breeding. ...well since you asked; I've ended up with an RV-4 fuselage & emp and I'm probably going to purchase a set of RV-6 wings. Soooo.... Chuck ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Chris Krieg <rv6a(at)mac.com>
Subject: Antennas installations
Date: Jan 21, 2004
I have many questions on antenna placement and cabling for them. Things like do duplexers work to use 1 antenna for 2 radios, etc. Rather than spew them all here, I'd like to find reference materials. Then, I can post up what I still don't understand. Is there a good website or book you folks can recommend for learning more about this? Chris ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 22, 2004
Subject: [ Steve Glasgow ] : New Email List Photo Share Available!
From: Email List Photo Shares <pictures(at)matronics.com>
A new Email List Photo Share is available: Poster: Steve Glasgow Subject: N123SG Photos http://www.matronics.com/photoshare/willfly@carolina.rr.com.02.22.2004/index.html o Main Photo Share Index http://www.matronics.com/photoshare o Submitting a Photo Share If you wish to submit a Photo Share of your own, please include the following information along with your email message and files: 1) Email List or Lists that they are related to: 2) Your Full Name: 3) Your Email Address: 4) One line Subject description: 5) Multi-line, multi-paragraph description of topic: 6) One-line Description of each photo or file: Email the information above and your files and photos to: pictures(at)matronics.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Chuck Daus" <dauscj(at)nb.net>
Subject: Wing tips
Date: Jan 25, 2004
Hello, I am just about done bolting my wings on my RV6A and was wondering about the wing tips. I had the opportunity to attend Sun N Fun 93' and met a wonderful fellow there. I believe his name was Tracy Sailor from Santa Maria California. He had a set of drooped non vans wing tips on his very fast RV6. Does anyone out there know where I can get a set of them? Is there any one in the south central Pa region (or close by) that would be interested in renting me some time in a RV6A. One last question. Can someone put me in tough with a very helpful FAA inspector that can help me through the whole certification process? Thank you for your time! Chuck RV6A ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Dean Psiropoulos" <deanpsir(at)easystreet.com>
Subject: Bolt torques
Date: Jan 26, 2004
Anyone have any idea how much to torque bolts holding the plastic bearing blocks used in the manual flap handle and rudder pedal mountings? I tightend them to the standard torques for the size of bolt used but that seems to compress the plastic quite a bit. Maybe it's not a problem but I would like to know for sure, any takers? Also the bellcrank bolt torques, I started tightening the elevator bellcrank down to 75 inch pounds but the bolt looked like it was starting to bow so I backed off. Anyone know what these assemblies are suppose to be torqued to (recalling that they are only supported in the center by thick wall aluminum tubes and the ball bearing assembly)? Thanks. Dean Psiropoulos RV-6A, canopy headaches PS: Anyone had to hack 1 inch out of both rear bows on your old style canopy frame? I did and I let Van's know I wasn't too happy about it either (I'm not supposed to manufacture small parts they are) ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 31, 2004
Subject: [ Greg Gruninger ] : New Email List Photo Share Available!
From: Email List Photo Shares <pictures(at)matronics.com>
A new Email List Photo Share is available: Poster: Greg Gruninger Subject: Completed RV-8! http://www.matronics.com/photoshare/GGrun5673@gbronline.com.01.31.2004/index.html o Main Photo Share Index http://www.matronics.com/photoshare o Submitting a Photo Share If you wish to submit a Photo Share of your own, please include the following information along with your email message and files: 1) Email List or Lists that they are related to: 2) Your Full Name: 3) Your Email Address: 4) One line Subject description: 5) Multi-line, multi-paragraph description of topic: 6) One-line Description of each photo or file: Email the information above and your files and photos to: pictures(at)matronics.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 31, 2004
Subject: [ Rob Ray ] : New Email List Photo Share Available!
From: Email List Photo Shares <pictures(at)matronics.com>
A new Email List Photo Share is available: Poster: Rob Ray Subject: RV-FOUR (Editor's Note: WOW!!) http://www.matronics.com/photoshare/smokyray@yahoo.com.01.31.2004/index.html o Main Photo Share Index http://www.matronics.com/photoshare o Submitting a Photo Share If you wish to submit a Photo Share of your own, please include the following information along with your email message and files: 1) Email List or Lists that they are related to: 2) Your Full Name: 3) Your Email Address: 4) One line Subject description: 5) Multi-line, multi-paragraph description of topic: 6) One-line Description of each photo or file: Email the information above and your files and photos to: pictures(at)matronics.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 31, 2004
Subject: [ Jerry Calvert ] : New Email List Photo Share Available!
From: Email List Photo Shares <pictures(at)matronics.com>
A new Email List Photo Share is available: Poster: Jerry Calvert Subject: Leather Interior http://www.matronics.com/photoshare/rv6@cox.net.01.31.2004/index.html o Main Photo Share Index http://www.matronics.com/photoshare o Submitting a Photo Share If you wish to submit a Photo Share of your own, please include the following information along with your email message and files: 1) Email List or Lists that they are related to: 2) Your Full Name: 3) Your Email Address: 4) One line Subject description: 5) Multi-line, multi-paragraph description of topic: 6) One-line Description of each photo or file: Email the information above and your files and photos to: pictures(at)matronics.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "wayne larabee" <wlarabee(at)specent.com>
Subject: toe in or out
Date: Feb 01, 2004
anybody have experience with correcting excessive toe in or out on the main gear of an rv6 ??? wlarabee@specent ,com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 01, 2004
Subject: [ Chalkie Stobbart+ ] : New Email List Photo Share Available!
From: Email List Photo Shares <pictures(at)matronics.com>
A new Email List Photo Share is available: Poster: Chalkie Stobbart+ Subject: Canopy and winshield attachment with Sika adhesive. http://www.matronics.com/photoshare/cajole76@ispwest.com.02.01.2004/index.html o Main Photo Share Index http://www.matronics.com/photoshare o Submitting a Photo Share If you wish to submit a Photo Share of your own, please include the following information along with your email message and files: 1) Email List or Lists that they are related to: 2) Your Full Name: 3) Your Email Address: 4) One line Subject description: 5) Multi-line, multi-paragraph description of topic: 6) One-line Description of each photo or file: Email the information above and your files and photos to: pictures(at)matronics.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 01, 2004
Subject: [ Chalkie Stobbart ] : New Email List Photo Share Available!
From: Email List Photo Shares <pictures(at)matronics.com>
A new Email List Photo Share is available: Poster: Chalkie Stobbart Subject: RV-List article applicable to all RV's and all Plexiglas canopies. http://www.matronics.com/photoshare/chalkboy@mweb.co.za.02.01.2004/index.html o Main Photo Share Index http://www.matronics.com/photoshare o Submitting a Photo Share If you wish to submit a Photo Share of your own, please include the following information along with your email message and files: 1) Email List or Lists that they are related to: 2) Your Full Name: 3) Your Email Address: 4) One line Subject description: 5) Multi-line, multi-paragraph description of topic: 6) One-line Description of each photo or file: Email the information above and your files and photos to: pictures(at)matronics.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Frank Friedman" <frankzip(at)charter.net>
, , , , , , , ,
Subject: RV8 Tail Kit for sale
Date: Feb 03, 2004
Changed projects so RV 8 tail kit for sale. Very little work done. This is a pre punched kit, however it was before the 4130 parts were powder coated. All 4130 parts were primered. Included are preview plans, electric trim kit, 18 years of the RVaitor, Avery temporary assembly pins, 2 construction videos. Vertical stabilizer tip is for a rear position light. Cost for all of this now would be about $1775. Buy it now for $1200. plus shipping before I put it on ebay. Bonus, free delivery within 100 miles of Oshkosh. Yep guys,I'm in OSH, 8-10 minutes to the airport, the downside, Jan temps, 17 days below normal and 4-5 inches of snow last night. Frank at 920-237-3536 or frankzip(at)charter.net ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "john white" <jakeaire(at)msn.com>
MepUpstairs(at)cs.com, jeanger(at)sympatico.ca, michaelwhite(at)knology.net, britesprite(at)earthlink.net, MEZEY(at)adelphia.net, ringsend(at)friend.ly.com, russjanice(at)msn.com, rv6-list(at)matronics.com, tmb1564(at)aol.com
Subject: FW: Fwd: This is not a Joke, It is very serious.
Date: Feb 05, 2004
Create your own personal Web page with the info you use most, at My MSN. From: Gals22(at)aol.com Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 11:55:51 EST Subject: Fwd: This is not a Joke, It is very serious. Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 09:19:12 -0600 From: Mary Laughlin <MaryTheToothFairy(at)cox.net> Subject: This is not a Joke, It is very serious. The Shell Oil Company recently issued a warning after three incidents in which mobile phones (cell phones) ignited fumes during fueling operations. In the first case,the phone was placed on the car's trunk lid during fueling; it rang and the ensuing fire destroyed the car and the gasoline pump. In the second, an individual hadsevere burns to their face when fumes ignited as they answered a call while refueling their car. And in the third,an individual suffered burns to the thigh and groin as fumes ignited when the phone, which was in their pocket, rang while they were fueling their car. You should know that: Mobile Phones can ignite fuel or fumes Mobile phones that light up when switched on or when they ring release enough energy to provide a spark for ignition Mobile phones should not be used in filling stations, or when fueling lawn mowers, boat! , Etc. Mobile phones should not be used, or should be turned off, around other materials that generate flammable or explosive fumes or dust, i.e. solvents, chemicals, gases, grain dust, etc.) To sum it up, here are the: Four Rules for Safe Refueling 1) Turn off engine 2) Don't smoke 3) Don't use your cell phone - leave it inside the vehicle or turn it off 4) Don't re-enter your vehicle during fueling Bob Renkes of Petroleum Equipment Institute is working on a campaign to try and make people aware of fires as a result of "static electricity" at gas pumps. His company has researched 150 cases of these fires. His results were very surprising: 1) Out of 150 cases, almost all of them were women. 2) Almost all cases involved the person getting back in their vehicle while the nozzle was still pumping gas, when finished and they went back to pull the nozzle out the fire started, as a result of static. 3) Most had on rubber-soled shoes. 4) Most men never get back in their vehicle until completely finished. This is why they are seldom involved in these types of fires. 5) Don't ever use cell phones when pumping gas 6) It is the vapors that come out of the gas that cause the fire, when connected with static charges. 7) There were 29 fires where the vehicle was reentered and the nozzle was touched during refueling from a variety of makes and models. Some resulting in extensive damage to the vehicle, to the station, and to the customer. 8) Seventeen fires that occurred before, during or immediately after the gas cap was removed and before! fueling began. Mr. Renkes stresses to NEVER get back into your vehicle while filling it with gas. If you absolutely HAVE to get in your vehicle while the gas is pumping, make sure you get out, close the door TOUCHING THE METAL, before you ever pull the nozzle out. This way the static from your body will be discharged before you ever remove the nozzle. As I mentioned earlier, The Petroleum Equipment Institute, along with several other companies now, are really trying to make the public aware of this danger.You can find out more information by going tohttp://www.pei.org/ . Once here, click in the center of the screen where it says "Stop Static". I ask you to please send this information to ALL your family and friends, especially those who have kids in the car with them while pumping gas. If this were to happen to them, they may not be able to get the children out in time. Thanks for passing this along. The Shell Oil Company recently issued a warning after three incidents in which mobile phones (cell phones) ignited fumes during fueling operations. In the first case,the phone was placed on the car's trunk lid during fueling; it rang and the ensuing fire destroyed the car and the gasoline pump. In the second, an individual hadsevere burns to their face when fumes ignited as they answered a call while refueling their car. And in the third,an individual suffered burns to the thigh and groin as fumes ignited when the phone, which was in their pocket, rang while they were fueling their car. You should know that: Mobile Phones can ignite fuel or fumes Mobile phones that light up when switched on or when they ring release enough energy to provide a spark for ignition Mobile phones should not be used in filling stations, or when fueling lawn mowers, boat! , Etc. Mobile phones should not be used, or should be turned off, around other materials that generate flammable or explosive fumes or dust, i.e. solvents, chemicals, gases, grain dust, etc.) To sum it up, here are the: Four Rules for Safe Refueling 1) Turn off engine 2) Don't smoke 3) Don't use your cell phone - leave it inside the vehicle or turn it off 4) Don't re-enter your vehicle during fueling Bob Renkes of Petroleum Equipment Institute is working on a campaign to try and make people aware of fires as a result of "static electricity" at gas pumps. His company has researched 150 cases of these fires. His results were very surprising: 1) Out of 150 cases, almost all of them were women. 2) Almost all cases involved the person getting back in their vehicle while the nozzle was still pumping gas, when finished and they went back to pull the nozzle out the fire started, as a result of static. 3) Most had on rubber-soled shoes. 4) Most men never get back in their vehicle until completely finished. This is why they are seldom involved in these types of fires. 5) Don't ever use cell phones when pumping gas 6) It is the vapors that come out of the gas that cause the fire, when connected with static charges. 7) There were 29 fires where the vehicle was reentered and the nozzle was touched during refueling from a variety of makes and models. Some resulting in extensive damage to the vehicle, to the station, and to the customer. 8) Seventeen fires that occurred before, during or immediately after the gas cap was removed and before! fueling began. Mr. Renkes stresses to NEVER get back into your vehicle while filling it with gas. If you absolutely HAVE to get in your vehicle while the gas is pumping, make sure you get out, close the door TOUCHING THE METAL, before you ever pull the nozzle out. This way the static from your body will be discharged before you ever remove the nozzle. As I mentioned earlier, The Petroleum Equipment Institute, along with several other companies now, are really trying to make the public aware of this danger.You can find out more information by going tohttp://www.pei.org/ . Once here, click in the center of the screen where it says "Stop Static". I ask you to please send this information to ALL your family and friends, especially those who have kids in the car with them while pumping gas. If this were to happen to them, they may not be able to get the children out in time. Thanks for passing this along. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Ken Hoshowski" <ve7fp(at)jetstream.net>
Subject: toe in or out
Date: Feb 04, 2004
anybody have experience with correcting excessive toe in or out on the main gear of an rv6 ??? wlarabee@specent ,com Wayne, My RV6 was one of the early ones where you had to drill the gear legs. I had a 4 inch by 4 inch 12 foot long angle iron handy although other sizes or even a good straight piece of wood would work. Using plum bobs I made sure my fuselage was on a center line and that my gear legs were square to the center line, then I used a small piece of .063 to shim the axels to toe in. My reasoning was that at this point the fuselage was quite light. When you put 400 to 600 lbs of load in the airplane the wheels will tend to toe out. My tires wore evenly and got many years of service out of them. Ken Hoshowski RV6 C-FKEH First flight Sept 8, 1993 Salmon Arm B.C. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Cy Galley" <cgalley(at)QCBC.ORG>
, , , , , , , , ,
Subject: Re: FW: Fwd: This is not a Joke, It is very serious.
Date: Feb 05, 2004
This is a HOAX or urban legend. Go to http://www.snopes.com/autos/hazards/gasvapor.asp To set off gas vapor, there must be a spark. Since solid state switching doesn't have any, this is physically impossible. Cy Galley Editor, EAA Safety Programs cgalley(at)qcbc.org or experimenter(at)eaa.org ----- Original Message ----- From: "john white" <jakeaire(at)msn.com> ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; Subject: RV6-List: FW: Fwd: This is not a Joke, It is very serious. > > > Create your own personal Web page with the info you use most, at My MSN. > From: Gals22(at)aol.com > Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 11:55:51 EST > Subject: Fwd: This is not a Joke, It is very serious. > To: tmallen(at)telepath.com, H20WITCH1(at)aol.com > > > Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 09:19:12 -0600 > From: Mary Laughlin <MaryTheToothFairy(at)cox.net> > To: BunnysBabyGirl(at)cox.net > Subject: This is not a Joke, It is very serious. > > > The Shell Oil Company recently issued a warning after three incidents in > which mobile phones (cell phones) ignited fumes during fueling operations. > > In the first case,the phone was placed on the car's trunk lid during > fueling; it rang and the ensuing fire destroyed the car and the gasoline > pump. > In the second, an individual hadsevere burns to their face when fumes > ignited as they answered a call while refueling their car. > And in the third,an individual suffered burns to the thigh and groin as > fumes ignited when the phone, which was in their pocket, rang while they > were fueling their car. > > You should know that: > Mobile Phones can ignite fuel or fumes > Mobile phones that light up when switched on or when they ring release > enough energy to provide a spark for ignition > Mobile phones should not be used in filling stations, or when fueling > lawn mowers, boat! , Etc. > Mobile phones should not be used, or should be turned off, around other > materials that generate flammable or explosive fumes or dust, i.e. > solvents, chemicals, gases, grain dust, etc.) > > To sum it up, here are the: Four Rules for Safe Refueling > 1) Turn off engine > 2) Don't smoke > 3) Don't use your cell phone - leave it inside the vehicle or turn it off > 4) Don't re-enter your vehicle during fueling > > Bob Renkes of Petroleum Equipment Institute is working on a campaign to > try and make people aware of fires as a result of "static electricity" > at gas pumps. His company has researched 150 cases of these fires. > His results were very surprising: > 1) Out of 150 cases, almost all of them were women. > 2) Almost all cases involved the person getting back in their vehicle > while the nozzle was still pumping gas, when finished and they went back > to pull the nozzle out the fire started, as a result of static. > 3) Most had on rubber-soled shoes. > 4) Most men never get back in their vehicle until completely finished. > This is why they are seldom involved in these types of fires. > 5) Don't ever use cell phones when pumping gas > 6) It is the vapors that come out of the gas that cause the fire, when > connected with static charges. > 7) There were 29 fires where the vehicle was reentered and the nozzle > was touched during refueling from a variety of makes and models. Some > resulting in extensive damage to the vehicle, to the station, and to the > customer. > 8) Seventeen fires that occurred before, during or immediately after the > gas cap was removed and before! fueling began. > > Mr. Renkes stresses to NEVER get back into your vehicle while filling it > with gas. > > If you absolutely HAVE to get in your vehicle while the gas is pumping, > make sure you get out, close the door TOUCHING THE METAL, before you > ever pull the nozzle out. This way the static from your body will be > discharged before you ever > remove the nozzle. > > As I mentioned earlier, The Petroleum Equipment Institute, along with > several other companies now, are really trying to make the public aware > of this danger.You can find out more information by going > tohttp://www.pei.org/ . Once here, click in the center of the screen > where it says "Stop Static". > > I ask you to please send this information to ALL your family and > friends, especially those who have kids in the car with them while > pumping gas. If this were to happen to them, they may not be able to get > the children out in time. Thanks for passing this along. > > > The Shell Oil Company > recently issued a warning after three incidents in which > mobile phones (cell phones) ignited fumes during fueling > operations. > > > In the first case,the phone was placed on the car's trunk lid > during fueling; it rang and the ensuing fire destroyed the car and the > gasoline pump. > > In the second, an individual hadsevere burns to their face when > fumes ignited as they answered a call while refueling their car. > > And in the third,an > individual suffered burns to the thigh and groin as fumes ignited when > the phone, which was in their pocket, rang while they were fueling > their car. > > > You should know that: > > Mobile Phones can ignite fuel or fumes > > Mobile phones that light up > when switched on or when they ring release enough energy to provide a > spark for ignition > > Mobile phones should not be > used in filling stations, or when fueling lawn mowers, boat! , Etc. > > Mobile phones should not be used, or should be turned off, around other > materials that generate flammable or explosive fumes or dust, i.e. > solvents, chemicals, gases, grain dust, etc.) > > > To sum it up, here are the: Four Rules for Safe Refueling > > 1) Turn off engine > > 2) Don't smoke > > 3) Don't use your cell phone - leave it inside the vehicle or turn it > off > > 4) Don't re-enter your vehicle during fueling > > > Bob Renkes of Petroleum Equipment Institute is working on a campaign to > try and make people aware of fires as a result of "static > electricity" at gas pumps. His company has researched 150 > cases of these fires. > > His results were very > surprising: > > 1) Out of 150 cases, almost all of them were women. > > 2) Almost all cases involved the person getting back in their vehicle > while the nozzle was still pumping gas, when finished and they went > back to pull the nozzle out the fire started, as a result of static. > > 3) Most had on rubber-soled shoes. > > 4) Most men never get back in their vehicle until completely finished. > This is why they are seldom involved in these types of fires. > > 5) Don't ever use cell phones > when pumping gas > > 6) It is the vapors that come out of the gas that cause the fire, when > connected with static charges. > > 7) There were 29 fires where the vehicle was reentered and the nozzle > was touched during refueling from a variety of makes and models. Some > resulting in extensive damage to the vehicle, to the station, and to > the customer. > > 8) Seventeen fires that occurred before, during or immediately after > the gas cap was removed and before! fueling began. > > > Mr. Renkes stresses to NEVER get back into your vehicle while > filling it with gas. > > > If you absolutely HAVE to get > in your vehicle while the gas is pumping, make sure you get out, close > the door TOUCHING THE METAL, before you > ever pull the nozzle out. This way the static from your body will be > discharged before you ever > > remove the nozzle. > > > As I mentioned earlier, The > Petroleum Equipment Institute, along with several other companies now, > are really trying to make the public aware of this danger.You can find > out more information by going tohttp://www.pei.org/ . Once here, click in the > center of the screen where it says "Stop Static". > > > I > ask you to please send this information to ALL your family and friends, > especially those who have kids in the car with them while pumping gas. > If this were to happen to them, they may not be able to get the > children out in time. Thanks for > passing this along. > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: <klwerner(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: FW: Fwd: This is not a Joke, It is very serious.
Date: Feb 05, 2004
Cy, This is - NO - joke at all! It's got nothing to do with the solid state switches you mentioned, but rather STATIC Electricity. It happened a couple of times here in the dry climate of the S.W., mainly on hot & dry summer days. It is probably not as much of an issue in area's with high humidity? The one I remember best was even caught on TV: A young lady was talking on her Cell, whilst opening her gas cap to fill up. POOF said the magic dragon, and flames came out of the filler neck. A little static spark from her petite little hand was all that was needed. (Unless of course there was a little gremlin inside the gas tank, waiting for her to open the lid, so it could set the vapors on fire with matches! But what are the chances of that, after all the matches would be wet, now wouldn't they be?) And NO, she was not smoking while talking. You say it's physically impossible??? I don't think so!!! I even make it a point ot leave my Cell inside the car while at the gas pump. We never stop learning about the intricate mysteries of live, now do we? P.S. This should not apply to Diesel drivers! So chit-chat away when you diesel-up. This is a HOAX or urban legend. Go to http://www.snopes.com/autos/hazards/gasvapor.asp To set off gas vapor, there must be a spark. Since solid state switching doesn't have any, this is physically impossible. Cy Galley Editor, EAA Safety Programs cgalley(at)qcbc.org or experimenter(at)eaa.org ----- Original Message ----- From: "john white" <jakeaire(at)msn.com> ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; Subject: RV6-List: FW: Fwd: This is not a Joke, It is very serious. > > > Create your own personal Web page with the info you use most, at My MSN. > From: Gals22(at)aol.com > Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 11:55:51 EST > Subject: Fwd: This is not a Joke, It is very serious. > To: tmallen(at)telepath.com, H20WITCH1(at)aol.com > > > Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 09:19:12 -0600 > From: Mary Laughlin <MaryTheToothFairy(at)cox.net> > To: BunnysBabyGirl(at)cox.net > Subject: This is not a Joke, It is very serious. > > > The Shell Oil Company recently issued a warning after three incidents in > which mobile phones (cell phones) ignited fumes during fueling operations. > > In the first case,the phone was placed on the car's trunk lid during > fueling; it rang and the ensuing fire destroyed the car and the gasoline > pump. > In the second, an individual hadsevere burns to their face when fumes > ignited as they answered a call while refueling their car. > And in the third,an individual suffered burns to the thigh and groin as > fumes ignited when the phone, which was in their pocket, rang while they > were fueling their car. > > You should know that: > Mobile Phones can ignite fuel or fumes > Mobile phones that light up when switched on or when they ring release > enough energy to provide a spark for ignition > Mobile phones should not be used in filling stations, or when fueling > lawn mowers, boat! , Etc. > Mobile phones should not be used, or should be turned off, around other > materials that generate flammable or explosive fumes or dust, i.e. > solvents, chemicals, gases, grain dust, etc.) > > To sum it up, here are the: Four Rules for Safe Refueling > 1) Turn off engine > 2) Don't smoke > 3) Don't use your cell phone - leave it inside the vehicle or turn it off > 4) Don't re-enter your vehicle during fueling > > Bob Renkes of Petroleum Equipment Institute is working on a campaign to > try and make people aware of fires as a result of "static electricity" > at gas pumps. His company has researched 150 cases of these fires. > His results were very surprising: > 1) Out of 150 cases, almost all of them were women. > 2) Almost all cases involved the person getting back in their vehicle > while the nozzle was still pumping gas, when finished and they went back > to pull the nozzle out the fire started, as a result of static. > 3) Most had on rubber-soled shoes. > 4) Most men never get back in their vehicle until completely finished. > This is why they are seldom involved in these types of fires. > 5) Don't ever use cell phones when pumping gas > 6) It is the vapors that come out of the gas that cause the fire, when > connected with static charges. > 7) There were 29 fires where the vehicle was reentered and the nozzle > was touched during refueling from a variety of makes and models. Some > resulting in extensive damage to the vehicle, to the station, and to the > customer. > 8) Seventeen fires that occurred before, during or immediately after the > gas cap was removed and before! fueling began. > > Mr. Renkes stresses to NEVER get back into your vehicle while filling it > with gas. > > If you absolutely HAVE to get in your vehicle while the gas is pumping, > make sure you get out, close the door TOUCHING THE METAL, before you > ever pull the nozzle out. This way the static from your body will be > discharged before you ever > remove the nozzle. > > As I mentioned earlier, The Petroleum Equipment Institute, along with > several other companies now, are really trying to make the public aware > of this danger.You can find out more information by going > tohttp://www.pei.org/ . Once here, click in the center of the screen > where it says "Stop Static". > > I ask you to please send this information to ALL your family and > friends, especially those who have kids in the car with them while > pumping gas. If this were to happen to them, they may not be able to get > the children out in time. Thanks for passing this along. > > > The Shell Oil Company > recently issued a warning after three incidents in which > mobile phones (cell phones) ignited fumes during fueling > operations. > > > In the first case,the phone was placed on the car's trunk lid > during fueling; it rang and the ensuing fire destroyed the car and the > gasoline pump. > > In the second, an individual hadsevere burns to their face when > fumes ignited as they answered a call while refueling their car. > > And in the third,an > individual suffered burns to the thigh and groin as fumes ignited when > the phone, which was in their pocket, rang while they were fueling > their car. > > > You should know that: > > Mobile Phones can ignite fuel or fumes > > Mobile phones that light up > when switched on or when they ring release enough energy to provide a > spark for ignition > > Mobile phones should not be > used in filling stations, or when fueling lawn mowers, boat! , Etc. > > Mobile phones should not be used, or should be turned off, around other > materials that generate flammable or explosive fumes or dust, i.e. > solvents, chemicals, gases, grain dust, etc.) > > > To sum it up, here are the: Four Rules for Safe Refueling > > 1) Turn off engine > > 2) Don't smoke > > 3) Don't use your cell phone - leave it inside the vehicle or turn it > off > > 4) Don't re-enter your vehicle during fueling > > > Bob Renkes of Petroleum Equipment Institute is working on a campaign to > try and make people aware of fires as a result of "static > electricity" at gas pumps. His company has researched 150 > cases of these fires. > > His results were very > surprising: > > 1) Out of 150 cases, almost all of them were women. > > 2) Almost all cases involved the person getting back in their vehicle > while the nozzle was still pumping gas, when finished and they went > back to pull the nozzle out the fire started, as a result of static. > > 3) Most had on rubber-soled shoes. > > 4) Most men never get back in their vehicle until completely finished. > This is why they are seldom involved in these types of fires. > > 5) Don't ever use cell phones > when pumping gas > > 6) It is the vapors that come out of the gas that cause the fire, when > connected with static charges. > > 7) There were 29 fires where the vehicle was reentered and the nozzle > was touched during refueling from a variety of makes and models. Some > resulting in extensive damage to the vehicle, to the station, and to > the customer. > > 8) Seventeen fires that occurred before, during or immediately after > the gas cap was removed and before! fueling began. > > > Mr. Renkes stresses to NEVER get back into your vehicle while > filling it with gas. > > > If you absolutely HAVE to get > in your vehicle while the gas is pumping, make sure you get out, close > the door TOUCHING THE METAL, before you > ever pull the nozzle out. This way the static from your body will be > discharged before you ever > > remove the nozzle. > > > As I mentioned earlier, The > Petroleum Equipment Institute, along with several other companies now, > are really trying to make the public aware of this danger.You can find > out more information by going tohttp://www.pei.org/ . Once here, click in the > center of the screen where it says "Stop Static". > > > I > ask you to please send this information to ALL your family and friends, > especially those who have kids in the car with them while pumping gas. > If this were to happen to them, they may not be able to get the > children out in time. Thanks for > passing this along. > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Cy Galley" <cgalley(at)QCBC.ORG>
Subject: Re: FW: Fwd: This is not a Joke, It is very serious.
Date: Feb 05, 2004
You are correct about static electricity. How would a cell phone create that even if on? Why would turning it off stop static electricity? Did you go to the snopes site? http://www.snopes.com/autos/hazards/gasvapor.asp Even the Petroleum Equipment Institute which had the warning at one time has removed the cell phone warning. Remember this important urgent message first appeared in 1999. If it had been true there would have been updates and many instances of fires caused by cell phone use as cell phones use has dramatically increased. If you have any references about fueling fires set by cell phones being on since 1999 please forward them so I can check them out. It is an urban legend! Cy Galley Editor, EAA Safety Programs cgalley(at)qcbc.org or experimenter(at)eaa.org ----- Original Message ----- From: <klwerner(at)comcast.net> Subject: Re: RV6-List: FW: Fwd: This is not a Joke, It is very serious. > > Cy, > This is - NO - joke at all! It's got nothing to do with the solid state switches you mentioned, but rather STATIC Electricity. > It happened a couple of times here in the dry climate of the S.W., mainly on hot & dry summer days. It is probably not as much of an issue in area's with high humidity? > > The one I remember best was even caught on TV: A young lady was talking on her Cell, whilst opening her gas cap to fill up. > POOF said the magic dragon, and flames came out of the filler neck. A little static spark from her petite little hand was all that was needed. (Unless of course there was a little gremlin inside the gas tank, waiting for her to open the lid, so it could set the vapors on fire with matches! But what are the chances of that, after all the matches would be wet, now wouldn't they be?) And NO, she was not smoking while talking. > > You say it's physically impossible??? I don't think so!!! > I even make it a point ot leave my Cell inside the car while at the gas pump. > > We never stop learning about the intricate mysteries of live, now do we? > > P.S. This should not apply to Diesel drivers! So chit-chat away when you diesel-up. > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Phil Smith" <phil@analysis-inc.com>
Subject: FW: Fwd: This is not a Joke, It is very serious.
Date: Feb 05, 2004
Guys, This has been researched thoroughly by my collegues in the forensic consulting industry. The problem is static electricity after fueling the vehicle. The explosion occurs when the person removes the gas nozzle and goes to put the cap back on. The static electricity comes from the person touching the car when the fumes are present. The window of opportunity is very small as the proper gas/air mixture is only present for a few seconds before the mixture becomes too lean as the fuel evaporates off. It has been found that this most often occurs with women drivers as they tend to get back into the car during fueling instead of standing around like most men and therefore have an opportunity to "recharge" with static electricity as they enter and exit the car. The cell phone issue is sensationalism by the news people and is not based on fact, only coincidence. -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv6-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv6-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Cy Galley Subject: Re: RV6-List: FW: Fwd: This is not a Joke, It is very serious. You are correct about static electricity. How would a cell phone create that even if on? Why would turning it off stop static electricity? Did you go to the snopes site? http://www.snopes.com/autos/hazards/gasvapor.asp Even the Petroleum Equipment Institute which had the warning at one time has removed the cell phone warning. Remember this important urgent message first appeared in 1999. If it had been true there would have been updates and many instances of fires caused by cell phone use as cell phones use has dramatically increased. If you have any references about fueling fires set by cell phones being on since 1999 please forward them so I can check them out. It is an urban legend! Cy Galley Editor, EAA Safety Programs cgalley(at)qcbc.org or experimenter(at)eaa.org ----- Original Message ----- From: <klwerner(at)comcast.net> Subject: Re: RV6-List: FW: Fwd: This is not a Joke, It is very serious. > > Cy, > This is - NO - joke at all! It's got nothing to do with the solid state switches you mentioned, but rather STATIC Electricity. > It happened a couple of times here in the dry climate of the S.W., mainly on hot & dry summer days. It is probably not as much of an issue in area's with high humidity? > > The one I remember best was even caught on TV: A young lady was talking on her Cell, whilst opening her gas cap to fill up. > POOF said the magic dragon, and flames came out of the filler neck. A little static spark from her petite little hand was all that was needed. (Unless of course there was a little gremlin inside the gas tank, waiting for her to open the lid, so it could set the vapors on fire with matches! But what are the chances of that, after all the matches would be wet, now wouldn't they be?) And NO, she was not smoking while talking. > > You say it's physically impossible??? I don't think so!!! > I even make it a point ot leave my Cell inside the car while at the gas pump. > > We never stop learning about the intricate mysteries of live, now do we? > > P.S. This should not apply to Diesel drivers! So chit-chat away when you diesel-up. > == == == == ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Patrick Kelley" <webmaster(at)flion.com>
Subject: FW: Fwd: This is not a Joke, It is very serious.
Date: Feb 05, 2004
The static electricity issue has nothing to do cell phones. Nothing in the operation of or possession of a cell phone can cause a static spark. You can generate a spark by picking up a cell phone, if the phone is at a different potential than you. If it was laying on the car when you picked it up and a spark was generated, that probably means that simply touching the car (with no cell phone present) would also have created a spark. Finally, gas does not ignite particularly easily, which is fortunate because my car and my winter coat did not get along when I lived in the Great Lakes region; I was always getting zapped when I touched my car. The conditions inside your engine cylinders is rather specific - too great or too little a fuel/air mixture and all the spark in the world won't ignite it. Put a little gas in a tuna can and toss in a match; chances are the match will go out (I am not endorsing this experiment, but I've seen it done). Lower a match to the gas instead of tossing it and it will ignite and burn like an oil lamp, not explosively. I don't know what you saw on TV, but I am skeptical. Patrick Kelley -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv6-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv6-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of klwerner(at)comcast.net Subject: Re: RV6-List: FW: Fwd: This is not a Joke, It is very serious. Cy, This is - NO - joke at all! It's got nothing to do with the solid state switches you mentioned, but rather STATIC Electricity. It happened a couple of times here in the dry climate of the S.W., mainly on hot & dry summer days. It is probably not as much of an issue in area's with high humidity? The one I remember best was even caught on TV: A young lady was talking on her Cell, whilst opening her gas cap to fill up. POOF said the magic dragon, and flames came out of the filler neck. A little static spark from her petite little hand was all that was needed. (Unless of course there was a little gremlin inside the gas tank, waiting for her to open the lid, so it could set the vapors on fire with matches! But what are the chances of that, after all the matches would be wet, now wouldn't they be?) And NO, she was not smoking while talking. You say it's physically impossible??? I don't think so!!! I even make it a point ot leave my Cell inside the car while at the gas pump. We never stop learning about the intricate mysteries of live, now do we? P.S. This should not apply to Diesel drivers! So chit-chat away when you diesel-up. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: <klwerner(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: FW: Fwd: This is not a Joke, It is very serious.
Date: Feb 05, 2004
I stand corrected about the Cell Phone causing the spark directly, and hereby apologize to the list for all the idiot drivers that create static discharges of any kind whilst on the gas pump. Practice proper grounding (one way or the other). On a sidenote: Perhaps that Ladie's Cell-Phone rang, then her boyfriend dumped her right there and then over the phone, which caused her to build up such a rage inside her, that the now furiously steaming Chick caused the air surrounding her to build up a static charge, which then created the spark that set her car briefly on fire. They now call her "One HOT Babe". And please do not archive this W.A.G. Konrad P.S. How did this static crap get on the RV6-List in the first place? ----- Original Message ----- From: Phil Smith To: rv6-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2004 1:57 PM Subject: RE: RV6-List: FW: Fwd: This is not a Joke, It is very serious. Guys, This has been researched thoroughly by my collegues in the forensic consulting industry. The problem is static electricity after fueling the vehicle. The explosion occurs when the person removes the gas nozzle and goes to put the cap back on. The static electricity comes from the person touching the car when the fumes are present. The window of opportunity is very small as the proper gas/air mixture is only present for a few seconds before the mixture becomes too lean as the fuel evaporates off. It has been found that this most often occurs with women drivers as they tend to get back into the car during fueling instead of standing around like most men and therefore have an opportunity to "recharge" with static electricity as they enter and exit the car. The cell phone issue is sensationalism by the news people and is not based on fact, only coincidence. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 05, 2004
From: Ron Lee <ronlee(at)pcisys.net>
Subject: Cell phones, static and fueling
> >It has been found that this most often occurs with women drivers as they >tend to get back into the car during fueling instead of standing around >like most men and therefore have an opportunity to "recharge" with >static electricity as they enter and exit the car. The cell phone issue >is sensationalism by the news people and is not based on fact, only >coincidence. Or is it that women get in and out of a vehicle and usually have a cell phone "glued" to their ear? (Gratuitous sexist comment) Ron Lee ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 11, 2004
Subject: [ Jim Jewell ] : New Email List Photo Share Available!
From: Email List Photo Shares <pictures(at)matronics.com>
A new Email List Photo Share is available: Poster: Jim Jewell Subject: Dynon Compass Module http://www.matronics.com/photoshare/jjewell@telus.net.02.11.2004/index.html o Main Photo Share Index http://www.matronics.com/photoshare o Submitting a Photo Share If you wish to submit a Photo Share of your own, please include the following information along with your email message and files: 1) Email List or Lists that they are related to: 2) Your Full Name: 3) Your Email Address: 4) One line Subject description: 5) Multi-line, multi-paragraph description of topic: 6) One-line Description of each photo or file: Email the information above and your files and photos to: pictures(at)matronics.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Stein Bruch" <stein(at)steinair.com>
"Rv8-List" , "Rv7-List" , "Rv6-List"
Subject: Wire Sizes in the wing
Date: Feb 12, 2004
SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS Hi Guys, Just a quick note about something that I've seen in the past month or two that is a little confusing. I've had no less than at least 6 people ask me for some AWG10 wire to use in their wings. Seems someone "out there" has recommened AWG10 or AWG12 for running to the landing lights. To anyone who is currently wiring your plane, don't fall into the trap that some people do.....that being "if some is perfect, more must be better" - with wire sizes, this is just a huge waste of money, weight, resources, etc.. If the recommened wire is AWG16 or AWG18, there is NO reason to use an AWG10. Just a quick FYI, an AWG10 wire running the approximate length of a RVxx wing, will carry something in the area of 800+ Watts. Who has a landing light requiring that much power?!?! Heck, an AWG16 wire should carry well over 180 Watts in that length. Here's the simple breakdown before adding in resistance per 1K. AWG10 - 70amps current carrying capacity AWG12 - 50amps AWG14 - 40amps So, if you are one of those people running those huge AWG10 wires to your wingtips, ask yourselves why?!? Two big reasons NOT to are: 1). Cost--AWG16-18 averages around $.17/ft & AWG10 is around $.50/ft (300% higher). 2). Weight--AWG16-18 averages .005 lbs/ft, where AWG10 = .03lbs/ft. Meaning, for an average set of wings at 2 wires x 18' = 36' x 2 wings = 72' of wire. At AWG16 or 18 the weight would only be about 8oz's total. AWG10 would be over 2 POUNDS!! Anyway, sorry about the rant...I just thought it might be a good idea to bring this to the surface. Somehow, somewhere, there is a movement to put fat wires into the wings, and I don't know why. If you are one of those people, please enlighten me and the rest of us! FYI, I do have AWG12 on up, and will stock some AWG10 in the future, but in all reality, there isn't much need for it. Cheers, Stein Bruch RV6's, Minneapolis http://www.steinair.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Wayne McMaster" <wmcmaster(at)ipapilot.org>
Subject: Re: Wire Sizes in the wing
Date: Feb 12, 2004
Stein, If you have time to reply, I have some wiring questions. I appreciate your comments, My tail is done - except I am waiting to the fiberglass until later. I have just about completed my RV 7 wings. My Fuselage is scheduled to arrive the first part of April. I have the time to work on finishing the wings, so I plan to do as much as I can. I may be moving this summer, so My completed parts will likely have a home in a friends hanger. I want to have the bottom skins on my wings and my wingtips installed if that is the case. Anyway, My note to you comes from the fact that I am currently trying to figure out the best way / type / size of wire to run to my wingtips. I don't want to overdo it, but do want to be sure I pick wire that will work properly. I have Bill Dubes LED nav lights. Any ideas what size wires to run for them. I have ordered the standard tail pos / strobe to run on the same circuit. I am planning on 75 watt wingtip mounted halogen landing lights -- however, I want to wire it as if I have 100w bulbs - so that if I decide that 75w/ tip is not good enough for me it will be a matter of ordering the 100w bulbs, and swapping the lights out. My dad lives on an unlighted strip, so I may have some dark takeoffs. I am planning on installing: Whelen CP660 strobe power supply - with white wingtip strobes / tail combo pos/strobe light, and possibly a red strobe (if I can find a low drag place to put it on the Fuselage.) VOR ant in both wingtips. What is the recommended wire for them? Comm ant in both wingtips (one for com, and one for FM radio) The wing tip comm will be comm 2. True trak autopilot servo ( standard pos at the aileron belcrank of the right wing) What is the best type of wire for it? Heated Piper type pitot tube (just outboard of the left aileron belcrank) I do plan to do my homework and find some good wiring / electrical system references, but would love to hear your opinions on the subject. If you don't have time to respond, I understand. Thanks in advance. Wayne McMaster SDF (Louisville, KY) RV 7 standard build wmcmaster(at)ipapilot.org 502-261-9961 h 502-387-1066 c ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stein Bruch" <stein(at)steinair.com> "Rv8-List" ; "Rv7-List" ; "Rv6-List" Subject: RV6-List: Wire Sizes in the wing > > Hi Guys, > > Just a quick note about something that I've seen in the past month or two > that is a little confusing. I've had no less than at least 6 people ask me > for some AWG10 wire to use in their wings. Seems someone "out there" has > recommened AWG10 or AWG12 for running to the landing lights. > > To anyone who is currently wiring your plane, don't fall into the trap that > some people do.....that being "if some is perfect, more must be better" - > with wire sizes, this is just a huge waste of money, weight, resources, > etc.. If the recommened wire is AWG16 or AWG18, there is NO reason to use > an AWG10. > > Just a quick FYI, an AWG10 wire running the approximate length of a RVxx > wing, will carry something in the area of 800+ Watts. Who has a landing > light requiring that much power?!?! Heck, an AWG16 wire should carry well > over 180 Watts in that length. > > Here's the simple breakdown before adding in resistance per 1K. > AWG10 - 70amps current carrying capacity > AWG12 - 50amps > AWG14 - 40amps > > So, if you are one of those people running those huge AWG10 wires to your > wingtips, ask yourselves why?!? Two big reasons NOT to are: > > 1). Cost--AWG16-18 averages around $.17/ft & AWG10 is around $.50/ft (300% > higher). > 2). Weight--AWG16-18 averages .005 lbs/ft, where AWG10 = .03lbs/ft. > Meaning, for an average set of wings at 2 wires x 18' = 36' x 2 wings 72' > of wire. At AWG16 or 18 the weight would only be about 8oz's total. AWG10 > would be over 2 POUNDS!! > > Anyway, sorry about the rant...I just thought it might be a good idea to > bring this to the surface. Somehow, somewhere, there is a movement to put > fat wires into the wings, and I don't know why. If you are one of those > people, please enlighten me and the rest of us! > > FYI, I do have AWG12 on up, and will stock some AWG10 in the future, but in > all reality, there isn't much need for it. > > Cheers, > Stein Bruch > RV6's, Minneapolis > > http://www.steinair.com > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 17, 2004
Subject: [ Jim Cone ] : New Email List Photo Share Available!
From: Email List Photo Shares <pictures(at)matronics.com>
A new Email List Photo Share is available: Poster: Jim Cone Subject: Jim Cone's Canopy Installation Instructions http://www.matronics.com/photoshare/jimnbev@olypen.com.02.17.2004/index.html o Main Photo Share Index http://www.matronics.com/photoshare o Submitting a Photo Share If you wish to submit a Photo Share of your own, please include the following information along with your email message and files: 1) Email List or Lists that they are related to: 2) Your Full Name: 3) Your Email Address: 4) One line Subject description: 5) Multi-line, multi-paragraph description of topic: 6) One-line Description of each photo or file: Email the information above and your files and photos to: pictures(at)matronics.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: StooDDS(at)aol.com
Date: Feb 28, 2004
Subject: Butt joint for main wing skins.
I have used one-piece upper main wing skins but want to butt joint the two lower skins over a new wider rib flange, as outlined in Frank Justice's instructions. The standard lap joint for the prepunched skins is secured with a double row of rivets spaced 1 1/4". To get an equivalent number of rivets in each skin/flange joint, I plan to use a single row of rivets to join each skin to the new flange, but space them 5/8" instead of 1 1/4". I think this will look neater than four rows at the wider spacing, but will it be OK strengthwise? Stewart Willoughby, RV 6 wings ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Peter Dugdale" <dugdale(at)voyager.net>
Subject: Whirl Wind Props
Date: Feb 28, 2004
Hello Anyone got any experience with the Whirl Wind 200RV CS prop?? How's the performance?? A couple of concerns: warranty/TBO seems low & the customer seems to be validating the design for Whirl Wind?. I am consider one on a RV6 with the IO360A1A 200HP. I like the idea of saving weight and no restrictions. I was thinking of the Hartzell with the new profile but it hasn't been approved yet with this engine. Any experience, good or bad would be appreciated. Thanks Peter ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Stein Bruch" <stein(at)steinair.com>
"Rv8-List" , "Rv9-List" , "Rv-List"
Subject: Quick Fit Tabs for Ground Blocks
Date: Mar 03, 2004
Hi Guys, Just a quick update. Awhile back people were looking for the ground block tabs separate from fuse blocks and pre-made ground blocks. I now have several hundred in stock. They have 10 tabs, (2 double rows of 5), are the 1/4 faston, with holes for mounting to a brass bar, bulkhead, etc.. Basically, you can "roll your own" ground blocks now, and it's much cheaper than buying one already made. I thought about making ground blocks, but it's easier just to sell the tabs, and let the builder make their own if they like. They are listed under "Accessories" on my website. Also, under switches you'll see some new Vinyl Toggle switch boots in 6 colors. They really dress up the switches nice! Last thing.....I now have all the 4 conductor shielded wire in stock for the Dynon Harnesses, and all harnesses/kits from this point forward will be delivered with Shielded wire as standard. Happy building and have a great day. Cheers, Stein Bruch http://www.steinair.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: dralle(at)matronics.com (Matt Dralle)
Date: Mar 03, 2004
DNA: not not archive
Subject: [PLEASE READ] Virus Laden Spam Purports To Be From Matronics...
Dear Listers, First let me say that I normally don't condone the sharing of warnings about Internet viruses on the Matronics Email Lists. I don't want to start a storm of discussion regarding computer viruses on the Lists, so please just note the information below and refrain from commenting to the List. The circumstances I describe below are disturbing enough that I felt an explanation is necessary. That being said... There is a new email-bourne virus running rampant on the Internet that is cleverly disguising itself as legitimate email warning of such things as: "your email account is disabled because of unauthorized access" "Some of our clients complained about the spam (negative e-mail content) outgoing from your e-mail account" "Probably, you have been infected by a proxy-relay trojan server. In order to keep your computer safe, follow the instructions." "Our main mailing server will be temporary unavailable for next two days, to continue receiving mail in these days you have to configure our free auto-forwarding service." All of these messages include an attachment that you are instructed to click upon to "Get more information", "clean the virus from your system", or "check your system for infections". These enclosures all contain a virus that will infect your system and propagate even more copies of the original message. The disturbing part of these messages is that they appear to be coming from very legitimate addresses and have very legitimate, convincing dialog. For example, I have received a number of them today that appear to be from "support(at)matronics.com", "management(at)matronics.com", "administration(at)matronics.com", and "staff(at)matronics.com". The text of the messages seems believable enough, and given the forged source address, seem even more legitimate. Please be assured that no one at Matronics.com will be sending you these kinds of messages. If you receive one, it is a spam/virus that has forged headers and was sent to you from someone other than Matronics. Delete the message and the attachment promptly. Invest in a copy of Norton Antivirus and keep the definitions up dated on a daily basis. Again, I want to stress that I *DO NOT* want a big discussion of viruses on the Matronics Email Lists. Please do not reply to this email with any comments. You may write to me directly at dralle(at)matronics.com if you wish, but do not include the List. Since many of these appear to come from matronics.com, I wanted to assure everyone that Matronics wasn't the real source of these messages. Let's be careful out there and keep those virus definitions up to date! Today alone, the Matronics spam filter and virus blocking appliance has filtered out 11,550 spam messages and 375 viruses! That's just in an 18 hour period! Best regards, Matt Dralle Matronics Email List Administrator -- Matt G. Dralle | Matronics | P.O. Box 347 | Livermore | CA | 94551 925-606-1001 Voice | 925-606-6281 FAX | dralle(at)matronics.com Email http://www.matronics.com/ W.W.W. | Featuring Products For Aircraft ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "rob" <edmist_r(at)bellsouth.net>
"Rv8-List" , "Rv9-List" , "Rv-List"
Subject: .
Date: Mar 04, 2004
________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 04, 2004
"Rv8-List" , "Rv9-List" , "Rv-List"
From: George Frost <ghfrost(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Mag impulse assembly
I need an impulse assembly for a slick magneto, part number M3529. Anyone have an extra one for sale or can suggest a source? AC Spruce is out of stock. George ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Roger Crandell" <rwc000(at)hotmail.com>
rv8-list(at)matronics.com, rv9-list(at)matronics.com
Date: Mar 08, 2004
Can anyone recommend a source for a two port (two transducer) manifold? Van's sells a three port unit, but I only need two ports. I could cut off one port on the Van's unit, but would rather not do that. Thanks Roger Crandell Get business advice and resources to improve your work life, from bCentral. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Noel & Yoshie Simmons" <noel(at)blueskyaviation.net>
"Rv-List(at)Matronics. Com" , "Rv9-List(at)Matronics. Com" , "Rv8-List(at)Matronics. Com" , , , , ,
Subject: job offer
Date: Mar 18, 2004
I am posting this to all the RV lists so if you get duplicates dont be upset. It is that time for me at Blue Sky Aviation to add another set of experienced hands. I am looking for someone with prior building experience, A&P would be nice, along with private pilot ticket. Must be trustworthy, hard working, reliable, and a good eye for detail. If you are or know of someone, please have him or her give me a call or drop me an email. This is a full time permanent position and is available immediately. Sincerely, Noel Simmons Blue Sky Aviation, Inc. Phone & Fax: 406-538-6574 noel(at)blueskyaviation.net www.blueskyaviation.net ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 22, 2004
From: George Frost <ghfrost(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: job offer
Hi Noel, Thanks for the info. This sounds like it would it be a good fit for a retired Industrial Design prof. with numerous ratings, a life long interest and contact with aviation, and an unfulfilled urge to move west from Ohio but I'm not quite done with my RV-6. It sounds like a good job for someone. Good luck finding the right one. George ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Cory Emberson" <bootless(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Santa Maria CA Fly-in (April 30-May 2)
Date: Mar 27, 2004
Hello everyone! With Matt Dralle's blessing (thank you, Matt!), I'm pleased to post this announcement for a terrific aviation fly-in weekend. SMXgig (in Santa Maria, CA) has become the year's largest face-to-face get-together of electronically networked aviators. We hope you'll plan to attend because we expect this year's gig to be the best ever. People come from all over the country (and sometimes overseas) to attend, and most of the sessions qualify for FAA Wings cards. The dates are 4/30-5/2/04 (Friday-Sunday) - it's a lot of fun, and a great chance for pilots from all over to mingle and share aviation stories, ideas, etc. The announcement below contains most of the crucial information, and you can get the rest from the website (www.smxgig.org). If you have any questions at all, just let me know, and thanks! ~~Cory Emberson KHWD >>> NOTICE TO AIRMEN! <<< Announcing the Sixteenth Annual SMXgig to be held on April 30 - May 2, 2004 at the Radisson on the Santa Maria (CA) Airport (aka SMX) www.smxgig.org SMXgig will be April 30 - May 2, 2004, at the Santa Maria Radisson. This year, our featured speaker after Friday night's dinner will be Rod Machado! "MACH 2 WITH MACHADO" is the byline Rod Machado has earned for his rapid fire delivery at his lively safety seminars and keynote speeches. His programs are information-packed, energetic, and humorous. He has spoken in all fifty of the United States and in Europe sharing his fresh approach to aviation education. If you can make it, please do. It's going to be pretty special. More information and the announcement/ registration info is available at www.smxgig.org You may also contact me by email at: cory(at)smxgig.org. All technical sessions will be held in the Enterprise Ballroom at the SMX Radisson. Each session will last about an hour. We schedule four tech sessions on Saturday morning, and four on Sunday morning. Most of the speakers are set (I'm still firming up a couple of slots - I'm working on a session about Experimentals): MIKE BUSCH - The Art and Science of Troubleshooting Your A frequently, that person is you. That's particularly true of problems that occur only in-flight and/or are intermittent. This session offers methodology for troubleshooting aimed at aircraft owners who aren't A&Ps. ED WILLIAMS - GPS - How It Works, and How to Work It Ed is a nuclear physicist working at Lawrence Livermore Labs. Ed does a remarkable job of making physics phun! BRENT BLUE, M.D. - Pilot Medicals: How to Avoid Problems with the FAA Brent is an AME Advocate, who specializes in helping the tough cases renew their medicals. He's a former member of EAA's medical advisory committee. DOUG RITTER - Equipping Yourself To Survive - Personal Survival Gear for Pilots Doug is a survival evangelist, personally driven to help pilots live through whatever comes next. www.equipped.org PAUL MILLNER - The Future of Avgas Paul works with ChevronTexaco, and is right in the middle of the industry developments regarding our fuel of choice. MARY DUFFY & UWE LEMKE - Flying in Europe Mary and Uwe are a Scot and a German who live in the San Francisco Bay Area, but return "home" often. As always, each qualifying session will get you a WINGS Safety Session card. Our Saturday evening event should be a delicious one! At 5:45 p.m., the BFUB (Big Fat Ugly Bus) will arrive at the Santa Maria Radisson to bring us to the Far Western Tavern for dinner in beautiful Guadalupe (www.farwesterntavern.com). DOLLARS AND CENTS Just as in previous years, there will be one flat all-encompassing "gig" fee that covers all events that involve significant out-of-pocket costs for the organizers. The fee is $160 per person, and will cover: - Friday afternoon welcome party - Friday evening dinner banquet - Saturday and Sunday tech sessions - Saturday afternoon lunch - Saturday evening dinner at the Far Western Tavern in Guadalupe - Meeting rooms and coffee service at the Santa Maria Radisson - Transportation to (and from) the Far Western Tavern Lodging at the SMX Radisson will cost $89.00/night for either a single or double room, which is far below the regular hotel room rate. Be sure you check in as a SMXgig attendee and get the special rate. We have our definitive preference listed with the hotel for rampside rooms - early registration can only help, but of course, the rampside rooms are subject to availability depending on how many existing guests are in those rooms. You do not need to register with the hotel - just give me your preferences, and I will take care of the reservations. Important: This year, our final rooming lists are due to the hotel on April 11, 2004 (the even of Sun 'n Fun), which will guarantee space and the group rate. The hotel will accept additional room reservations after that, on a space- and rate-available basis. They will try their best to accommodate us after that date, but the hotel is already sold out for the weekend. The website (www.smxgig.org) has detailed information about the schedule, meals, hotel accommodations, and online registration. If you'd like your own announcement/registration emailed to you, or have any other questions, just let me know. (cory(at)smxgig.org or bootless(at)earthlink.net ). Thanks, and see you there! best, Cory Emberson ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 30, 2004
From: Garey Wittich <gareywittich2000(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: A GUIDE TO AIRCRAFT PAINTING & CORROSION CONTROL
rv7-list(at)matronics.com, rv8-list(at)matronics.com For helpful information see: See Nov 03 Archieves: "A GUIDE TO AIRCRAFT PAINTING & CORROSION CONTROL" __________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Maxwell Bennett" <maxwell33(at)adelphia.net>
Subject: Start another project ?
Date: Apr 02, 2004
You builders may be considering another project. after your successful first flights. I wish to purchase a flying side by side RV with the following description: RV-6/6A, 7/7A Lo time since new O-360 IFR instruments and navs Best workmanship Paint optional My own "American Adventure", a pretty Starduster Too open cockpit biplane is gone. My hangar is empty. D51, a sod 2000 ft. airstrip, has 20 aircraft based there, but no RV's. I am convinced that the RV is the best airplane for me and will outclass the Taylorcrafts and Cessnas. Contact me directly with details and pics. I promise to take good care of your beautiful machine. Max Bennett Buffalo, NY maxwell33(at)adelphia.net ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Brunke" <jwbrunk(at)attglobal.net>
Subject: RV fly in
Date: May 02, 2004
To all RVators, June 12th at Boone, Iowa. RV fly-in. See Cleaveland tool's web site for more details. Happy building and flying, John Brunke N215KC St. Charles, IL ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jeff Williams" <Tramsootru(at)direcway.com>
Subject: Buying an RV Questions...
Date: May 09, 2004
rv7-list(at)matronics.com INNOCENT GROUP 0.002278 0.600000 0.6 SUBJ_BUY 'Subject' starts with Buy, Buying Hey guys- Well, I've been trying to convince my father we need an RV.. After Oshkosh last year, we both thought we'd like to have one.. However, we wanted to build one, just don't really have the time.. So, we'd like to buy one.. So, a local guy, who had built several RV's and won a few awards at Oshkosh, is selling his RV6.. So, I'm wondering if you guys could tell me a few hints/tips of things that are good "buying an RV" questions to ask.. One thing we would like to know, is there anyway to "stress test" an RV before we buy? I guess we just want to be safe in the RV.. Any hints, feedback, etc would be greatfully appreciated.. Thanks Jeff ________________________________________________________________________________
From: yobylf2815(at)comcast.net
Subject: rv6a fuselage kit for sale
Date: May 11, 2004
Very reluctantly parting with my rv6a fuselage kit (regular, not QB). Crate is unopened. Price/delivery negotiable. If interested, contact me off list at cpaulson14(at)comcast.net. ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: Speaking of Beautiful fixed pitched Props...
Date: Jun 07, 2004
From: "Rabaut, Chuck" <Chuck.Rabaut(at)fresnosheriff.org>
"rv4-list(at)matronics. com \(E-mail\)" , "rv6-list(at)matronics. com \(E-mail\)" , "rv7-list(at)matronics. com \(E-mail\)" , "rv8-list(at)matronics. com \(E-mail\)" , "rv-list(at)matronics. com \(E-mail\)" 2.6 SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS Similar addresses in recipient list Hi guys & Gals, I just received my new Prop from "CloudCars". It looks BEAUTIFUL. This prop reminds me of the high quality & low price we use to get from Pacesetter Props. Pacesetter is no longer in business but man did I love my old Pacesetter prop. The guy who made my new prop is Jay Anderson. He is very knowledgeable and willing to work with you to get a custom Prop that you will love. His prices are extremely fair (I got mine for about $500.oo including s your price may vary depending on what you want) and the delivery time was only about 6 weeks. For a custom made, quality Prop you can't beat that price with a stick. You can contact Jay at cloudcars99(at)yahoo.com or (325) 356-2810. His motto/slogan is "Quality Wood Propellers at Reasonable Prices". I'm a satisfied customer. **note: I get no discount, nor do I have any financial interest in this business.** We experimental builders & flyers should support small businesses that provide quality products & service at reasonable prices. That's why I'm sharing this hot tip with all the RV folks. If you call him, tell 'em Chuck says "Hi". Chuck ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: RE: CloudCars prop
Date: Jun 10, 2004
From: "Rabaut, Chuck" <Chuck.Rabaut(at)fresnosheriff.org>
"rv6-list(at)matronics. com \(E-mail\)" , "rv7-list(at)matronics. com \(E-mail\)" , "rv8-list(at)matronics. com \(E-mail\)" , "rv-list(at)matronics. com \(E-mail\)" 2.6 SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS Similar addresses in recipient list Chris, I agree whole heartedly about props being a critical component on a aircraft. I've been flyin' since 1976 (all sorts of aircraft) and I've been fortunate enough not to have ever had a prop related in-flight problem (though I have experienced "the joy" of several engine out/dead stick landings, but like any thrilling story, those take awhile to tell). What I have learned is that every business starts out as a small "garage business", as you referred to them. Even IBM started in a garage in Menlo Park, Ca. The small businesses are the real innovators, they are the ones who bring the best quality and ideas forward at a "competitive" price; because they have to just to survive. The BIG guys usually just kick back and rely on their name. And... you PAY alot of extra $$$ for their name too. I am not knocking the quality of Sensenich or other big names. But I know that there are high quality, reasonably priced competitors that I would rather support. Heck, if I want a Sensenich label on my prop, Sensenich sells their name stickers in various catalogues too. When I ordered my prop from Jay at CloudCars, I knew exactly what I wanted. However Jay also gave me valuable, knowledgeable advice. Now that I have my prop, Jay is insisting that I hook it up and try it/fly it to see if it performs as I expected it to. Then I send it back for final backing and edge protection, and if I need any pitch or other adjustments he'll do that too. Now I will give updates to the RV-list(s) as I go, but it sure is re-assuring that CloudCars is that interested in making certain I am (as Jay has said) "Completely Satisfied" with my new prop. PaceSetter was not a large company, and unfortunately they are no longer in the business (though I know the guy still makes props on the side). But PaceSetter's quality, reliability and name carried a lot of respect from everyone that I've ever spoken with who has flown on their props. It is very unfortunate that it took several years for their name and word of their quality to spread; I think that was a major part of their downfall. I believe CloudCars is on par with the quality and hence the reliability, of PaceSetter and the BIG named manufactures in the production of their props. I hazard to guess that if/when CloudCars gets well known, their prices will certainly rise as the demand rises for their skilled craftsmanship. But the choice is always up to the consumer. By the way, ask Jay if he builds three (3) bladed props, I just got an inquiry about that. Take care, and take to the Air, Chuck p.s. Chris I hope you don't mind, I'm gonna CC a copy to the RV-list(s) because I think this is a valid discussion topic for experimental builders. -----Original Message----- From: Chris Boultinghouse [mailto:sonexbuilder(at)yahoo.com] Subject: CloudCars prop Hi Chuck, I saw your post on the RV list about the prop you got from Jay at CloudCars. I dropped him a note about a prop for my Jabiru 3300/Sonex combo, and received a prompt reply (and a picture). His prices are reasonable too (about $250 less than a comparable Sensenich wood prop). My problem is that my wife is uncomfortable with the idea of me buying something as critical as a prop from a "garage business". I was hoping you'd be able to offer some insight into the craftmanship and perceived design of the prop. Have you flown yours yet? I'm not averted to spending the money for a Sensenich (or Prince) but I do like to save a buck and help the little guy as long as I'm not risking my butt to do so! Thanks for your thoughts. ===== Best Regards, Chris Boultinghouse Austin, TX Sonex N260SX (reserved) http://sonex260.wheelsup.org __________________________________ http://messenger.yahoo.com/ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Russell Johnson <entec1(at)pld.com>
Subject: You`ve got 1 VoiceMessage!
Date: - - - , 20-
Dear Customer! You`ve got 1 VoiceMessage from voicemessage.com website! You can listen your Virtual VoiceMessage at the following link: http://virt.voicemessage.com/index.listen.php2=35affv or by clicking the attached link. Send VoiceMessage! Try our new virtual VoiceMessage Empire! Best regards: SNAF.Team (R). ________________________________________________________________________________
From: MnwPeeps(at)aol.com
Date: Jun 21, 2004
Subject: Hot to buy!
Would like to hear from any RV-6 owner wanting to sell. Looking for a "nice" one - good paint, avionics, etc. I've owned an SJN-5B and two Yak-52-s - time to move up! Mike at mnwpeeps(at)aol.com, or 978-468-3058. Boston area. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: <tgreene5(at)cinci.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Hot to buy!
Date: Jun 21, 2004
Build your own!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11 ----- Original Message ----- From: <MnwPeeps(at)aol.com> Subject: RV6-List: Hot to buy! > > Would like to hear from any RV-6 owner wanting to sell. Looking for a "nice" > one - good paint, avionics, etc. I've owned an SJN-5B and two Yak-52-s - time > to move up! > Mike at mnwpeeps(at)aol.com, or 978-468-3058. Boston area. > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: MnwPeeps(at)aol.com
Date: Jun 22, 2004
Subject: Re: Hot to buy!
In a message dated 6/21/04 8:30:20 PM Eastern Daylight Time, tgreene5(at)cinci.rr.com writes: << Build your own!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11 >> Ah, an inventive idea I might never have thought of. But, Rivetbreath, I gotta tell ya I'm a klultz with tools, can't put my kids' Xmas toys together, and would never fly or drive ANYthing I've put together. (I AM a superb stick 'n' rudder pilot, however.....jet jockey in the USN, and an adroitly capable airline pilot - retired. Go figure.) Additionally, at an average of two hours per day (which would be tough for me to maintain), at 2200 hours to build, that works out to about three years, by which time I could well have gone tits up. But thanks for the constructive suggestion - it was a mid-blower! ________________________________________________________________________________
From: <tgreene5(at)cinci.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Hot to buy!
Date: Jun 22, 2004
Maybe a C-172 or C-182? ----- Original Message ----- From: <MnwPeeps(at)aol.com> Subject: Re: RV6-List: Hot to buy! > > In a message dated 6/21/04 8:30:20 PM Eastern Daylight Time, > tgreene5(at)cinci.rr.com writes: > > << Build your own!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11 >> > > Ah, an inventive idea I might never have thought of. But, Rivetbreath, I > gotta tell ya > I'm a klultz with tools, can't put my kids' Xmas toys together, and would > never fly or drive ANYthing I've put together. (I AM a superb stick 'n' rudder > pilot, however.....jet jockey in the USN, and an adroitly capable airline pilot > - retired. Go figure.) > > Additionally, at an average of two hours per day (which would be tough for me > to maintain), at 2200 hours to build, that works out to about three years, by > which time I could well have gone tits up. But thanks for the constructive > suggestion - it was a mid-blower! > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 23, 2004
From: eregensburg(at)triad.rr.com
Subject: RV6A 4sale pics 1
----- Original Message ----- From: tgreene5(at)cinci.rr.com Date: Tuesday, June 22, 2004 9:00 pm Subject: Re: RV6-List: Hot to buy! > > Maybe a C-172 or C-182? > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <MnwPeeps(at)aol.com> > To: > Subject: Re: RV6-List: Hot to buy! > > > > > > In a message dated 6/21/04 8:30:20 PM Eastern Daylight Time, > > tgreene5(at)cinci.rr.com writes: > > > > << Build your own!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11 >> > > > > Ah, an inventive idea I might never have thought of. But, > Rivetbreath, I > > gotta tell ya > > I'm a klultz with tools, can't put my kids' Xmas toys together, > and would > > never fly or drive ANYthing I've put together. (I AM a superb > stick 'n' > rudder > > pilot, however.....jet jockey in the USN, and an adroitly > capable airline > pilot > > - retired. Go figure.) > > > > Additionally, at an average of two hours per day (which would be > tough for > me > > to maintain), at 2200 hours to build, that works out to about > three years, > by > > which time I could well have gone tits up. But thanks for the > constructive> suggestion - it was a mid-blower! > > > > > > > _- > _- > _- > _- > ======================================================================== > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 23, 2004
From: eregensburg(at)triad.rr.com
Subject: RV6A 4sale pics 2
pics 2 ----- Original Message ----- From: tgreene5(at)cinci.rr.com Date: Tuesday, June 22, 2004 9:00 pm Subject: Re: RV6-List: Hot to buy! > > Maybe a C-172 or C-182? > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <MnwPeeps(at)aol.com> > To: > Subject: Re: RV6-List: Hot to buy! > > > > > > In a message dated 6/21/04 8:30:20 PM Eastern Daylight Time, > > tgreene5(at)cinci.rr.com writes: > > > > << Build your own!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11 >> > > > > Ah, an inventive idea I might never have thought of. But, > Rivetbreath, I > > gotta tell ya > > I'm a klultz with tools, can't put my kids' Xmas toys together, > and would > > never fly or drive ANYthing I've put together. (I AM a superb > stick 'n' > rudder > > pilot, however.....jet jockey in the USN, and an adroitly > capable airline > pilot > > - retired. Go figure.) > > > > Additionally, at an average of two hours per day (which would be > tough for > me > > to maintain), at 2200 hours to build, that works out to about > three years, > by > > which time I could well have gone tits up. But thanks for the > constructive> suggestion - it was a mid-blower! > > > > > > > _- > _- > _- > _- > ======================================================================== > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 23, 2004
From: eregensburg(at)triad.rr.com
Subject: RV6A 4sale pics 3
RV6A 4sale pics 3 ----- Original Message ----- From: tgreene5(at)cinci.rr.com Date: Tuesday, June 22, 2004 9:00 pm Subject: Re: RV6-List: Hot to buy! > > Maybe a C-172 or C-182? > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <MnwPeeps(at)aol.com> > To: > Subject: Re: RV6-List: Hot to buy! > > > > > > In a message dated 6/21/04 8:30:20 PM Eastern Daylight Time, > > tgreene5(at)cinci.rr.com writes: > > > > << Build your own!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11 >> > > > > Ah, an inventive idea I might never have thought of. But, > Rivetbreath, I > > gotta tell ya > > I'm a klultz with tools, can't put my kids' Xmas toys together, > and would > > never fly or drive ANYthing I've put together. (I AM a superb > stick 'n' > rudder > > pilot, however.....jet jockey in the USN, and an adroitly > capable airline > pilot > > - retired. Go figure.) > > > > Additionally, at an average of two hours per day (which would be > tough for > me > > to maintain), at 2200 hours to build, that works out to about > three years, > by > > which time I could well have gone tits up. But thanks for the > constructive> suggestion - it was a mid-blower! > > > > > > > _- > _- > _- > _- > ======================================================================== > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "cgalley" <cgalley(at)qcbc.org>
Subject: Re: RV6A 4sale pics 1
Date: Jun 23, 2004
All pictures are stripped before being send out to the list. ----- Original Message ----- From: <eregensburg(at)triad.rr.com> Subject: RV6-List: RV6A 4sale pics 1 > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: tgreene5(at)cinci.rr.com > Date: Tuesday, June 22, 2004 9:00 pm > Subject: Re: RV6-List: Hot to buy! > > > > > Maybe a C-172 or C-182? > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: <MnwPeeps(at)aol.com> > > To: > > Subject: Re: RV6-List: Hot to buy! > > > > > > > > > > In a message dated 6/21/04 8:30:20 PM Eastern Daylight Time, > > > tgreene5(at)cinci.rr.com writes: > > > > > > << Build your own!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11 >> > > > > > > Ah, an inventive idea I might never have thought of. But, > > Rivetbreath, I > > > gotta tell ya > > > I'm a klultz with tools, can't put my kids' Xmas toys together, > > and would > > > never fly or drive ANYthing I've put together. (I AM a superb > > stick 'n' > > rudder > > > pilot, however.....jet jockey in the USN, and an adroitly > > capable airline > > pilot > > > - retired. Go figure.) > > > > > > Additionally, at an average of two hours per day (which would be > > tough for > > me > > > to maintain), at 2200 hours to build, that works out to about > > three years, > > by > > > which time I could well have gone tits up. But thanks for the > > constructive> suggestion - it was a mid-blower! > > > > > > > > > > > > _- > > _- > > _- > > _- > > ======================================================================== > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 07, 2004
From: Howard Walrath <der_jagdflieger(at)prodigy.net>
Subject: Operating Efficiently Lean Of Peak
The recent rv-list posts on EI versus magnetoes for LOP operation was interesting and informative. Several posters pointed out that a matched set of injectors was key to efficient operation Lean Of Peak. The Van's Airforce World Wide Wing homepage has an article on this subject I wrote that was in EAA Chapter 168's newsletter. The url for the Van's Airforce World Wide Wing homepage homepage is www.vansairforce.net . The "THE RV NEWS" column on the homepage discusses the article andcontains a link to the entire issue. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Warren Gretz <warrengretz(at)gretzaero.com>
Subject: Gretz Aero Heated Pitot Tubes and Mounting Brackets
Date: Jul 16, 2004
Hello Builders, We have been off of this list for some time, but wanted to let you know we are still making and selling parts for your aircraft. We have been in the process of moving our operation from Colorado to Idaho for the past several months. With luck, we should be settled into our new location in Idaho by the end of the first week of August. Meanwhile, our Heated Pitot Tube Mounting Bracket Kits are still very popular and we been keeping very busy producing them. We do want to let everyone know that we will need to increase our prices slightly, effective the 1st of August. This increse is due to our raw material costs going up and also shipping charges that have been going up over the past two years. We have tried to keep from raising prices as long as we can, but now need to do so. Sorry. GOOD NEWS is that we are getting very close to having our NEWEST Gretz Aero designed product available! It is the GA-1000. This is a heated pitot tube that is a totaly new design. It is completely different than any pitot before. The Gretz Aero heated pitot tube is called the GA-1000 and will look nearly like the PH502-12CR pitot tube except the GA-1000 will be black in color, and it will be lighter in weight than any other heated pitot tube on the market. The GA-1000 will be what we are calling a "smart" pitot tube. It will give the pilot feedback as to its operation on the panel. It will also be very energy conserative and be excellent installed in an aircraft with a small altanator in the electrical system. The only bad part is, it is not available yet. We plan on having it available very soon, if production does not throw us a problem. It has taken us MUCH MUCH longer to get this project done than we ever dreamed it would. The TARGET price on the GA-1000 is +/- $325 depending upon final production costs. This price will include shipping charges in the US. There are a number of builders that are purchasing our mounting bracket kit, which was designed for the PH502-12CR pitot, (which has been available for years), this same bracket kit will also fit the new GA-1000. Once the mounting bracket is installed in your aircraft, the GA-1000 pitot tube can be installed at a later date when it is available. Other pitot tubes that are now available, will also fit into the same mounting bracket as well as the GA-1000. We will make as big a splash as we can on our website, http://www.gretzaero.com , and this List, when the new Gretz Aero GA-1000 heated pitot tube product is available. There will be a page on the Gretz Aero website that will cover this product in great detail. I hope this information helps you. Your can place orders with Gretz Aero on the gretzaero.com website, print out the printable order form on the order page of the website and mail, or call the phone numbers below. If you want to reply to us about this message posting, please do so directly to my e-mail address below and not on the LIST. Good Building to you! Warren Gretz Gretz Aero 15405 Bates Creek Rd. Oreana, ID 83650 warrengretz(at)gretzaero.com http://www.gretzaero.com 720-308-0010 208-834-2312 Warren Gretz Gretz Aero ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Mike Comeaux" <mcomeaux(at)bendnet.com>
Subject: Calhoun/Accident
Date: Jul 26, 2004
Anyone on list know what happened to Ron Calhoun / RV6 Accident / Texas Area ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "steve" <pacer20(at)alltel.net>
Subject: BUYING
Date: Jul 27, 2004
0.3 SUBJ_BUY Subject line starts with Buy or Buying Guys I am new to the group. I need help! I am looking for a Rv 6 160hp or 180 Slider, IFR. I have worn out the phone, my printer, and have just driven 700 miles to look at one that (being kind) look like I might have been the builder). I had one located and thought I had it tied up but at the last minute the owner sold it to a local (Fla). If any one has any info on a 6 other than in TAP, Controller, Dough's or Barnstormer please let me know. I am located on Miller Airpark (NC30) gray hanger on the right landing north have restroom and cold drinks in the frig DROP IN ANY TIME. Steve ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 27, 2004
From: Grahame Go <rv6(at)shaw.ca>
Subject: Re: BUYING
Do you have a budget in mind ... I will keep an eye out for you here in BC ----- Original Message ----- From: "steve" <pacer20(at)alltel.net> Subject: RV6-List: BUYING > > Guys I am new to the group. I need help! I am looking for a Rv 6 160hp or > 180 Slider, IFR. I have worn out the phone, my printer, and have just driven > 700 miles to look at one that (being kind) look like I might have been the > builder). > > I had one located and thought I had it tied up but at the last minute the > owner sold it to a local (Fla). > > If any one has any info on a 6 other than in TAP, Controller, Dough's or > Barnstormer please let me know. > > I am located on Miller Airpark (NC30) gray hanger on the right landing north > have restroom and cold drinks in the frig DROP IN ANY TIME. > > > Steve > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: MnwPeeps(at)aol.com
Date: Jul 27, 2004
Subject: Buying
Subject(at)matronics.com, line(at)matronics.com, starts(at)matronics.com, with(at)matronics.com, Buy(at)matronics.com, or(at)matronics.com, Buying(at)matronics.com Another guy lookin' round the country. I got stiffed by the same guy (in Florida) as Steve - one day before I was to arrive to see/fly it on a one-day round-trip from Boston. Nice. My budget would be up to 65K, for the right a/c - hoping for something closer to 55-60. I prefer a larger engine, and as much IFR as possible at that price level. Thank you. Mike ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Phil Smith" <phil@analysis-inc.com>
Subject: RE: you?
Date: Aug 15, 2004
didn't sent it, don't open it. -----Original Message----- From: rv6-list(at)matronics.com [mailto:rv6-list(at)matronics.com] Subject: you? picture? ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 25, 2004
From: Garey Wittich <gareywittich2000(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: "Need Extra Hands" in building a RV-8A QB - Santa Monica, Calif
rv8-list(at)matronics.com, rv9-list(at)matronics.com, rv-list(at)matronics.com Greetings: Any Builders who live in the Santa Monica, Calif area. Building a RV-8A QB in my garage 5 minutes from Santa Monica Airport and "need extra hands". Willing to help somebody with their project TOO. My wife does not want to get involved and the local EAA Chapter is all composite builders. At the rate I am making progress it will take me 5 life times to complete !!!!! Thanks, Garey Wittich (310) 392-1682 __________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: IFR instruments
Date: Aug 25, 2004
From: "Hinde, Frank George (Corvallis)" <frank.hinde(at)hp.com>
, , , 1.7 SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS Similar addresses in recipient list Hi Guys, I was almost convinced the Garmin GNS 430 hooked to a Dynon and a Digitrack A/P was the almost perfect base to a light weight IFR setup for an RV-7, then I see that BMA has come out with the EFIS Lite G3 which has the GPS, and an electronic version of the VOR/GS receiver that can be driven by an SL30 Navcom. Apparently this system drives a BMA 2 axis autopilot. Looking at all of this gives me aN IFR panel for about $11k including the transponder and 2 axis A/P. The similar setup using the GNS 430 comes in at about $14.5K with single axis A/P. Anyone have any experience or thoughts on this set up? I haven't started IFR training yet so I'm fumbling a little on all the requirements...Not sure about the "indicator lights" (marker beacon?) that are apparently built into the Nav head that the GNS 430 would drive. Frank ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Harry E. Hawkins" <hawkbud(at)speednetllc.com>
Subject: Re: "Need Extra Hands" in building a RV-8A QB - Santa Monica,
Calif
Date: Aug 26, 2004
If I were closer I'd help. Michigan is a long way. Do something everyday... no matter what. You will be amazed at your progress. My Son Jeff built an RV-8 in about five years... not a quick build. He also kept his job. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Garey Wittich" <gareywittich2000(at)yahoo.com> ; ; ; Subject: RV6-List: "Need Extra Hands" in building a RV-8A QB - Santa Monica, Calif > > Greetings: > > Any Builders who live in the Santa Monica, Calif area. > Building a RV-8A QB in my garage 5 minutes from Santa > Monica Airport and "need extra hands". Willing to > help somebody with their project TOO. My wife does > not want to get involved and the local EAA Chapter is > all composite builders. At the rate I am making > progress it will take me 5 life times to complete > !!!!! > > Thanks, > Garey Wittich (310) 392-1682 > > > __________________________________ > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: CharlesRV6(at)aol.com
Date: Aug 26, 2004
Subject: Re: "Need Extra Hands" in building a RV-8A QB - Santa Monica,
Calif Great advice. It took me 7 years thru two major illnesses. It was great therapy. JUst think, there's really no rush is there? ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 27, 2004
rv7-list(at)matronics.com, rv10-list(at)matronics.com, rv8-list(at)matronics.com, rv3-list(at)matronics.com, rv4-list(at)matronics.com
From: Richard Scott <rscott(at)cascadeaccess.com>
Subject: Van's Homecoming-- Where to eat
1.70 SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS Similar addresses in recipient list Scrumptous breakfast both Saturday & Sunday will be served right at Van's--pancakes, eggs, ham, sausage, bacon, coffee & orange juice. And lunch on Saturday, burgers, corn on the cob. Served by EAA Chapter 902. Don't miss out! ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 05, 2004
From: Land Shorter <landshorter2(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: New product announcement: affordable VG's
piper-list(at)matronics.com, pitts-list(at)matronics.com, rocket-list(at)matronics.com, rv-list(at)matronics.com, rv3-list(at)matronics.com, rv4-list(at)matronics.com, rv6-list(at)matronics.com, rv7-list(at)matronics.com.1.00.SORTED_RECIPS.Recipient.list.is.sorted.by.address Hey folks, I double checked and Matt Dralle's earlier post says it's OK to post about new aviation products as long as the message doesn't come off as having a "flavor" of "traditional spam". Don't worry I'm not going to try to sell you anything that supposedly makes any of your body parts larger (or smaller) and this product is directly aviation related :) I'm just an airplane builder, owner, pilot, and aviation nut who wants to tell you where you can find more information about a great new product. I've been selling kits of vortex generators (VG's) for only $95 and my customers are telling me they really like the performance gains they're seeing. VG's are great for reducing stall speeds and allow you to land slower, shorter, and safer. I invite you to check out my site at www.landshorter.com and see what you think. My VG's can be quickly installed for testing using removable double-stick tape and come with a 100% money-back guarantee so why not try them out on your plane? You'll be really glad you did :) Thanks and let's keep 'em flying! Joa Harrison The VG Guy www.landshorter.com 1-877-272-1414 (toll free) --------------------------------- ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 11, 2004
Subject: [ Bob Olds ] : New Email List Photo Share Available!
From: Email List Photo Shares <pictures(at)matronics.com>
A new Email List Photo Share is available: Poster: Bob Olds Subject: Vortex generators on RV-4 http://www.matronics.com/photoshare/Oldsfolks@aol.com.09.11.2004/index.html o Main Photo Share Index http://www.matronics.com/photoshare o Submitting a Photo Share If you wish to submit a Photo Share of your own, please include the following information along with your email message and files: 1) Email List or Lists that they are related to: 2) Your Full Name: 3) Your Email Address: 4) One line Subject description: 5) Multi-line, multi-paragraph description of topic: 6) One-line Description of each photo or file: Email the information above and your files and photos to: pictures(at)matronics.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Harry E. Hawkins" <hawkbud(at)speednetllc.com>
Subject: Re: RV6-List Digest: 0 Msgs - 10/05/04
Date: Oct 06, 2004
please unsubscribe ----- Original Message ----- From: "RV6-List Digest Server" <rv6-list-digest(at)matronics.com> Subject: RV6-List Digest: 0 Msgs - 10/05/04 > * > > ================================================== > Online Versions of Today's List Digest Archive > ================================================== > > Today's complete RV6-List Digest can also be found in either of the > two Web Links listed below. The .html file includes the Digest formatted > in HTML for viewing with a web browser and features Hyperlinked Indexes > and Message Navigation. The .txt file includes the plain ASCII version > of the RV6-List Digest and can be viewed with a generic text editor > such as Notepad or with a web browser. > > HTML Version: > > > > Text Version: > > http://www.matronics.com/digest/rv6-list/Digest.RV6-List.2004-10-05.txt > > > ================================================ > EMail Version of Today's List Digest Archive > ================================================ > > > RV6-List Digest Archive > --- > Total Messages Posted Tue 10/05/04: 0 > > > Today's Message Index: > ---------------------- > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 23, 2004
Subject: [ Neal George ] : New Email List Photo Share Available!
From: Email List Photo Shares <pictures(at)matronics.com>
A new Email List Photo Share is available: Poster: Neal George Subject: 110v Hobbs Meter http://www.matronics.com/photoshare/Neal.George@MAXWELL.AF.MIL.10.23.2004/index.html o Main Photo Share Index http://www.matronics.com/photoshare o Submitting a Photo Share If you wish to submit a Photo Share of your own, please include the following information along with your email message and files: 1) Email List or Lists that they are related to: 2) Your Full Name: 3) Your Email Address: 4) One line Subject description: 5) Multi-line, multi-paragraph description of topic: 6) One-line Description of each photo or file: Email the information above and your files and photos to: pictures(at)matronics.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Peter Dugdale" <dugdale(at)voyager.net>
Subject: Air inlet mods
Date: Oct 23, 2004
Hello I have a -6 with the 200HP I0360A1A flying with a wooden prop (w/ext) and a throttle body air inlet modeled off the -8 demonstrator (Straight air flow into the throttle body which I did a wet layup). I plan on a C/S prop over the winter which means I need to shorten the T.B. inlet due to not needing the prop extension. I was looking at Oshkosh at some of the "slot" style inlet just below the spinner. Looks to be less drag. Please reply if you have done this, or know someone who has? Looks like a wet layup? Thanks Peter ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Mcmahon" <rv6(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: Air inlet mods
Date: Oct 25, 2004
Peter Does this help any!!.have 0360 A1A carb John McMahon (Painting) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Peter Dugdale" <dugdale(at)voyager.net> Subject: RV6-List: Air inlet mods > > Hello > > I have a -6 with the 200HP I0360A1A flying with a wooden prop (w/ext) and a throttle body air inlet modeled off the -8 demonstrator (Straight air flow into the throttle body which I did a wet layup). I plan on a C/S prop over the winter which means I need to shorten the T.B. inlet due to not needing the prop extension. I was looking at Oshkosh at some of the "slot" style inlet just below the spinner. Looks to be less drag. > Please reply if you have done this, or know someone who has? Looks like a wet layup? > > Thanks > > Peter > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 14, 2004
Subject: [ Keith T Uhls ] : New Email List Photo Share Available!
From: Email List Photo Shares <pictures(at)matronics.com>
A new Email List Photo Share is available: Poster: Keith T Uhls Lists: RV-List,RV6-List,RV7-List,RV9-List Subject: RV-7 with GRT EFIS and Dynon http://www.matronics.com/photoshare/keithuhls@juno.com.11.14.2004/index.html o Main Photo Share Index http://www.matronics.com/photoshare o Submitting a Photo Share If you wish to submit a Photo Share of your own, please include the following information along with your email message and files: 1) Email List or Lists that they are related to: 2) Your Full Name: 3) Your Email Address: 4) One line Subject description: 5) Multi-line, multi-paragraph description of topic: 6) One-line Description of each photo or file: Email the information above and your files and photos to: pictures(at)matronics.com _-===================================================================== _-_-= -- Please Support Your Lists This Month -- _-= (And Get Some AWESOME FREE Gifts!) _-_-= November is the Annual List Fund Raiser. Click on the _-= Contribution link below to find out more about this _-= year's Terrific Free Incentive Gifts provided by the _-= The Builder's Bookstore www.buildersbooks.com! _-_-= List Contribution Web Site _-_-= http://www.matronics.com/contribution _-_-= Thank you for your generous support! _-= -Matt Dralle, List Admin. _-_-===================================================================== _-= - The RV6-List Email Forum - _-= This forum is sponsored entirely through the Contributions _-= of List members. You'll never see banner ads or any other _-= form of direct advertising on the Matronics Forums. _-===================================================================== _-= List Related Information _-= Post Message: rv6-list(at)matronics.com _-= UN/SUBSCRIBE: http://www.matronics.com/subscription _-= List FAQ: http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/RV6-List.htm _-= Search Engine: http://www.matronics.com/search _-= 7-Day Browse: http://www.matronics.com/browse/rv6-list _-= Browse Digests: http://www.matronics.com/digest/rv6-list _-= Live List Chat: http://www.matronics.com/chat _-= Archives: http://www.matronics.com/archives _-= Photo Share: http://www.matronics.com/photoshare _-= List Specific: http://www.matronics.com/rv6-list _-= Other Lists: http://www.matronics.com/emaillists _-= Trouble Report http://www.matronics.com/trouble-report _-= Contributions: http://www.matronics.com/contribution _-===================================================================== ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 15, 2004
From: "Ralph E. Capen" <recapen(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Aileron trim springs
Fellow listers, Does anyone know if the RV8 manual trim kit springs are the same as the RV6 manual trim kit springs.!? I bought the -8 set to get the benefit of some of the parts and the instructions. I may need to get the -6 set to get the correct springs though...I think the -8 springs are too heavy. Anyone with a set of -6 manual aileron trim instructions - I would appreciate a set of scans.... Thanks, Ralph Capen ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 15, 2004
From: Jeff Williams <Tramsootru(at)direcway.com>
Subject: Intercom's
Hey guys- My father and I finallyu picked up a 6 and are loving it.. However, there are a few things we want to change.. The airplane currently has one of the "portable" intercom systems.. We're looking for something decent, 2 place with a music input.. So I was curious as to what you guys were using? We've been browsing the Aircraft Spruce catalog but are still unsure which one to grab.. Thanks guys! Jeff N314L ________________________________________________________________________________
From: ronlee(at)pcisys.net
Subject: Re: Intercom's
Date: Nov 15, 2004
Add to your list the PS Engineering PM3000. I am using the 2000 and am happy with it. The 3000 is apparently better. Ron Lee --------------------------------------------- This message was sent using Endymion MailMan. http://www.endymion.com/products/mailman/ ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 15, 2004
From: Jeff Williams <Tramsootru(at)direcway.com>
Subject: Re: Intercom's
Actually, the PM3000 is one we have been looking at very closely.. Jeff ----- Original Message ----- From: <ronlee(at)pcisys.net> Subject: Re: RV6-List: Intercom's > > Add to your list the PS Engineering PM3000. I am using the 2000 and am > happy with it. The 3000 is apparently better. > > Ron > Lee > > --------------------------------------------- > This message was sent using Endymion MailMan. > http://www.endymion.com/products/mailman/ > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Mark Kosco" <hooks75(at)msn.com>
Subject: Re: Intercom's
Date: Nov 15, 2004
Jeff, Consider the PMA 1000II. Easy to install and performance is excellent, worth the money (has music input). Mark Kosco N641RM RV-6 ----- Original Message ----- From: Jeff Williams Subject: RV6-List: Intercom's Hey guys- My father and I finallyu picked up a 6 and are loving it.. However, there are a few things we want to change.. The airplane currently has one of the "portable" intercom systems.. We're looking for something decent, 2 place with a music input.. So I was curious as to what you guys were using? We've been browsing the Aircraft Spruce catalog but are still unsure which one to grab.. Thanks guys! Jeff N314L ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Philippjw54(at)aol.com
Date: Nov 15, 2004
Subject: Re: RV6-List Digest: 1 Msgs - 11/14/04
That sure is a good looking RV6. Nice job. I'm building a 4 and hope to share some photos soon. Phil Wallace Newton MA ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Charles Heathco" <cheathco(at)comcast.net>
Subject: O-320 airbox specifically the air filter.
Date: Nov 17, 2004
I just got my RV6A and have 2 problems I need help with. !- scratchy noise on rec side of the Kx-125, xmit is ok. I pulled the cowel (not easy) and there is no filter on the alternator, could that be the problem? (both batty and field wirs are sheilded) 2- the K&N air filter needs to be changed, I havent found a replacement as no-one has been able to find one or cross it to another brand. (AO64A6) Vans shows E3260 replacement, but I would like to find one local Atlanta and get the plane back together today. also has anyone come up with a better airbox? Getting to the filter is like breaking into Ft Knox. Charlie Heathco ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "son hoang" <son(at)hoangs.com>
Subject: Re: O-320 airbox specifically the air filter.
Date: Nov 17, 2004
In my opinion the alternator noise is a high pitch, constant tone so it's unlikely your problem comes from there. I would check the ground of the radio, the insulation of the jacks Son Hoang RV6A flying 100 hrs ----- Original Message ----- From: +ACI-Charles Heathco+ACI- +ADw-cheathco+AEA-comcast.net+AD4- Subject: RV6-List: O-320 airbox specifically the air filter. +AD4- --+AD4- RV6-List message posted by: +ACI-Charles Heathco+ACI- +ADw-cheathco+AEA-comcast.net+AD4- +AD4- +AD4- I just got my RV6A and have 2 problems I need help with. +ACE-- scratchy noise +AD4- on rec side of the Kx-125, xmit is ok. I pulled the cowel (not easy) and +AD4- there is no filter on the alternator, could that be the problem? (both batty +AD4- and field wirs are sheilded) 2- the K+ACY-N air filter needs to be changed, I +AD4- havent found a replacement as no-one has been able to find one or cross it +AD4- to another brand. (AO64A6) Vans shows E3260 replacement, but I would like to +AD4- find one local Atlanta and get the plane back together today. also has +AD4- anyone come up with a better airbox? Getting to the filter is like breaking +AD4- into Ft Knox. Charlie Heathco +AD4- +AD4- +AD4- +AF8--+AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9- +AD4- +AF8--+AD0- +AD4- +AF8--+AD0- -- Please Support Your Lists This Month -- +AD4- +AF8--+AD0- (And Get Some AWESOME FREE Gifts+ACE-) +AD4- +AF8--+AD0- +AD4- +AF8--+AD0- November is the Annual List Fund Raiser. Click on the +AD4- +AF8--+AD0- Contribution link below to find out more about this +AD4- +AF8--+AD0- year's Terrific Free Incentive Gifts provided by the +AD4- +AF8--+AD0- The Builder's Bookstore www.buildersbooks.com+ACE- +AD4- +AF8--+AD0- +AD4- +AF8--+AD0- List Contribution Web Site +AD4- +AF8--+AD0- +AD4- +AF8--+AD0- http://www.matronics.com/contribution +AD4- +AF8--+AD0- +AD4- +AF8--+AD0- Thank you for your generous support+ACE- +AD4- +AF8--+AD0- -Matt Dralle, List Admin. +AD4- +AF8--+AD0- +AD4- +AF8--+AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9- +AD4- +AF8--+AD0- - The RV6-List Email Forum - +AD4- +AF8--+AD0- This forum is sponsored entirely through the Contributions +AD4- +AF8--+AD0- of List members. You'll never see banner ads or any other +AD4- +AF8--+AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9- +AD4- +AF8--+AD0- List Related Information +AD4- +AF8--+AD0- Post Message: rv6-list+AEA-matronics.com +AD4- +AF8--+AD0- UN/SUBSCRIBE: http://www.matronics.com/subscription +AD4- +AF8--+AD0- List FAQ: http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/RV6-List.htm +AD4- +AF8--+AD0- Search Engine: http://www.matronics.com/search +AD4- +AF8--+AD0- 7-Day Browse: http://www.matronics.com/browse/rv6-list +AD4- +AF8--+AD0- Browse Digests: http://www.matronics.com/digest/rv6-list +AD4- +AF8--+AD0- Archives: http://www.matronics.com/archives +AD4- +AF8--+AD0- Photo Share: http://www.matronics.com/photoshare +AD4- +AF8--+AD0- List Specific: http://www.matronics.com/rv6-list +AD4- +AF8--+AD0- Other Lists: http://www.matronics.com/emaillists +AD4- +AF8--+AD0- Contributions: http://www.matronics.com/contribution +AD4- +AF8--+AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9- +AD4- +AD4- +AD4- +AD4- ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Charles Heathco" <cheathco(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: O-320 airbox specifically the air filter.
Date: Nov 17, 2004
Yes, not the Alt. I put on filter and made no diff, It is a buzing sound that speeds up and slows down with engine speed. I will go over grounds in the morn. Tnx, charlie ----- Original Message ----- From: "son hoang" <son(at)hoangs.com> Subject: Re: RV6-List: O-320 airbox specifically the air filter. > > In my opinion > the alternator noise is a high pitch, constant tone so it's unlikely your > problem comes from there. I would check the ground of the radio, the > insulation of the jacks > Son Hoang RV6A flying 100 hrs > ----- Original Message ----- > From: +ACI-Charles Heathco+ACI- +ADw-cheathco+AEA-comcast.net+AD4- > To: +ADw-RV6-List+AEA-matronics.com+AD4- > Subject: RV6-List: O-320 airbox specifically the air filter. > > > +AD4- --+AD4- RV6-List message posted by: +ACI-Charles Heathco+ACI- > +ADw-cheathco+AEA-comcast.net+AD4- > +AD4- > +AD4- I just got my RV6A and have 2 problems I need help with. +ACE-- > scratchy > noise > +AD4- on rec side of the Kx-125, xmit is ok. I pulled the cowel (not > easy) and > +AD4- there is no filter on the alternator, could that be the problem? > (both > batty > +AD4- and field wirs are sheilded) 2- the K+ACY-N air filter needs to be > changed, I > +AD4- havent found a replacement as no-one has been able to find one or > cross it > +AD4- to another brand. (AO64A6) Vans shows E3260 replacement, but I would > like > to > +AD4- find one local Atlanta and get the plane back together today. also > has > +AD4- anyone come up with a better airbox? Getting to the filter is like > breaking > +AD4- into Ft Knox. Charlie Heathco > +AD4- > +AD4- > +AD4- > +AF8--+AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9- > +AD4- +AF8--+AD0- > +AD4- +AF8--+AD0- -- Please Support Your Lists This Month -- > +AD4- +AF8--+AD0- (And Get Some AWESOME FREE Gifts+ACE-) > +AD4- +AF8--+AD0- > +AD4- +AF8--+AD0- November is the Annual List Fund Raiser. Click on the > +AD4- +AF8--+AD0- Contribution link below to find out more about this > +AD4- +AF8--+AD0- year's Terrific Free Incentive Gifts provided by the > +AD4- +AF8--+AD0- The Builder's Bookstore www.buildersbooks.com+ACE- > +AD4- +AF8--+AD0- > +AD4- +AF8--+AD0- List Contribution Web Site > +AD4- +AF8--+AD0- > +AD4- +AF8--+AD0- http://www.matronics.com/contribution > +AD4- +AF8--+AD0- > +AD4- +AF8--+AD0- Thank you for your generous support+ACE- > +AD4- +AF8--+AD0- -Matt Dralle, List Admin. > +AD4- +AF8--+AD0- > +AD4- > +AF8--+AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9- > +AD4- +AF8--+AD0- - The RV6-List Email Forum - > +AD4- +AF8--+AD0- This forum is sponsored entirely through the > Contributions > +AD4- +AF8--+AD0- of List members. You'll never see banner ads or any > other > +AD4- > +AF8--+AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9- > +AD4- +AF8--+AD0- List Related Information > +AD4- +AF8--+AD0- Post Message: rv6-list+AEA-matronics.com > +AD4- +AF8--+AD0- UN/SUBSCRIBE: http://www.matronics.com/subscription > +AD4- +AF8--+AD0- List FAQ: > http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/RV6-List.htm > +AD4- +AF8--+AD0- Search Engine: http://www.matronics.com/search > +AD4- +AF8--+AD0- 7-Day Browse: > +AD4- +AF8--+AD0- Browse Digests: > +AD4- +AF8--+AD0- Archives: http://www.matronics.com/archives > +AD4- +AF8--+AD0- Photo Share: http://www.matronics.com/photoshare > +AD4- +AF8--+AD0- List Specific: http://www.matronics.com/rv6-list > +AD4- +AF8--+AD0- Other Lists: http://www.matronics.com/emaillists > +AD4- +AF8--+AD0- Contributions: http://www.matronics.com/contribution > +AD4- > +AF8--+AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9- > +AD4- > +AD4- > +AD4- > +AD4- > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: <kbob(at)cox.net>
Subject: Re: O-320 airbox specifically the air filter.
Date: Nov 18, 2004
FYI - The K&N Filters are guaranteed for one million miles if used on a car. In other words they don't need replaced. Clean them and use filter oil per K&N (www.kandn.com). Your mileage may vary ;) Kelly 6A finish kit > > From: "Charles Heathco" <cheathco(at)comcast.net> > Date: 2004/11/17 Wed PM 08:29:53 EST > To: > Subject: Re: RV6-List: O-320 airbox specifically the air filter. > > > Yes, not the Alt. I put on filter and made no diff, It is a buzing sound > that speeds up and slows down with engine speed. I will go over grounds in > the morn. Tnx, charlie > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "son hoang" <son(at)hoangs.com> > To: > Subject: Re: RV6-List: O-320 airbox specifically the air filter. > > > > > > In my opinion > > the alternator noise is a high pitch, constant tone so it's unlikely your > > problem comes from there. I would check the ground of the radio, the > > insulation of the jacks > > Son Hoang RV6A flying 100 hrs > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: +ACI-Charles Heathco+ACI- +ADw-cheathco+AEA-comcast.net+AD4- > > To: +ADw-RV6-List+AEA-matronics.com+AD4- > > Subject: RV6-List: O-320 airbox specifically the air filter. > > > > > > +AD4- --+AD4- RV6-List message posted by: +ACI-Charles Heathco+ACI- > > +ADw-cheathco+AEA-comcast.net+AD4- > > +AD4- > > +AD4- I just got my RV6A and have 2 problems I need help with. +ACE-- > > scratchy > > noise > > +AD4- on rec side of the Kx-125, xmit is ok. I pulled the cowel (not > > easy) and > > +AD4- there is no filter on the alternator, could that be the problem? > > (both > > batty > > +AD4- and field wirs are sheilded) 2- the K+ACY-N air filter needs to be > > changed, I > > +AD4- havent found a replacement as no-one has been able to find one or > > cross it > > +AD4- to another brand. (AO64A6) Vans shows E3260 replacement, but I would > > like > > to > > +AD4- find one local Atlanta and get the plane back together today. also > > has > > +AD4- anyone come up with a better airbox? Getting to the filter is like > > breaking > > +AD4- into Ft Knox. Charlie Heathco > > +AD4- > > +AD4- > > +AD4- > > +AF8--+AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9- > > +AD4- +AF8--+AD0- > > +AD4- +AF8--+AD0- -- Please Support Your Lists This Month -- > > +AD4- +AF8--+AD0- (And Get Some AWESOME FREE Gifts+ACE-) > > +AD4- +AF8--+AD0- > > +AD4- +AF8--+AD0- November is the Annual List Fund Raiser. Click on the > > +AD4- +AF8--+AD0- Contribution link below to find out more about this > > +AD4- +AF8--+AD0- year's Terrific Free Incentive Gifts provided by the > > +AD4- +AF8--+AD0- The Builder's Bookstore www.buildersbooks.com+ACE- > > +AD4- +AF8--+AD0- > > +AD4- +AF8--+AD0- List Contribution Web Site > > +AD4- +AF8--+AD0- > > +AD4- +AF8--+AD0- http://www.matronics.com/contribution > > +AD4- +AF8--+AD0- > > +AD4- +AF8--+AD0- Thank you for your generous support+ACE- > > +AD4- +AF8--+AD0- -Matt Dralle, List Admin. > > +AD4- +AF8--+AD0- > > +AD4- > > +AF8--+AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9- > > +AD4- +AF8--+AD0- - The RV6-List Email Forum - > > +AD4- +AF8--+AD0- This forum is sponsored entirely through the > > Contributions > > +AD4- +AF8--+AD0- of List members. You'll never see banner ads or any > > other > > +AD4- > > +AF8--+AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9- > > +AD4- +AF8--+AD0- List Related Information > > +AD4- +AF8--+AD0- Post Message: rv6-list+AEA-matronics.com > > +AD4- +AF8--+AD0- UN/SUBSCRIBE: http://www.matronics.com/subscription > > +AD4- +AF8--+AD0- List FAQ: > > http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/RV6-List.htm > > +AD4- +AF8--+AD0- Search Engine: http://www.matronics.com/search > > +AD4- +AF8--+AD0- 7-Day Browse: > > +AD4- +AF8--+AD0- Browse Digests: > > +AD4- +AF8--+AD0- Archives: http://www.matronics.com/archives > > +AD4- +AF8--+AD0- Photo Share: http://www.matronics.com/photoshare > > +AD4- +AF8--+AD0- List Specific: http://www.matronics.com/rv6-list > > +AD4- +AF8--+AD0- Other Lists: http://www.matronics.com/emaillists > > +AD4- +AF8--+AD0- Contributions: http://www.matronics.com/contribution > > +AD4- > > +AF8--+AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9AD0APQA9- > > +AD4- > > +AD4- > > +AD4- > > +AD4- > > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Philippjw54(at)aol.com
Date: Nov 18, 2004
Subject: Re: RV6-List Digest: 5 Msgs - 11/17/04
To Charles Heathco, Concerning the scratchy noise on rec side of the Kx-125. Have you checked that only one end of the shielded wires are grounded? Ground only (1 ) one end of the shielding otherwise you defeat the purpose for the shielding to give a path for unwanted emf noise (electrical magnetic force) trying to induce emf to other wiring. Regards Philip Wallace RV4 builder still pushing forward ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Mark Kosco" <hooks75(at)msn.com>
Subject: Re: Intercom's
Date: Nov 18, 2004
The 3000, 4000 etc are great units. But, two seats, cost, functions, easy to install, are pluses. I have dual KY-97's, KLN-89B, KT-76A, PM1000II installed and wired by me. Works great. But it's up to your wallet. Enjoy. Mark ----- Original Message ----- From: Jeff Williams Subject: Re: RV6-List: Intercom's Actually, the PM3000 is one we have been looking at very closely.. Jeff ----- Original Message ----- From: <ronlee(at)pcisys.net> Subject: Re: RV6-List: Intercom's > > Add to your list the PS Engineering PM3000. I am using the 2000 and am > happy with it. The 3000 is apparently better. > > Ron > Lee > > --------------------------------------------- > This message was sent using Endymion MailMan. > http://www.endymion.com/products/mailman/ > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Charles Heathco" <cheathco(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: RV6-List Digest: 5 Msgs - 11/17/04
Date: Nov 19, 2004
Hiya, no I haven checked that. I went over all conn to see if had a loose one, and also if any headset jacks loose, found psgr side slightly loose, tightedn, no help, also took ant conn loose and refit, no help. I will check for double ground. Could ant be causing this? Someone said trotle cable and others could act as ant, but they are far away from unit. (ant in wing tip , dont know wich one.) Charle ----- Original Message ----- From: <Philippjw54(at)aol.com> Subject: RV6-List: Re: RV6-List Digest: 5 Msgs - 11/17/04 > > To Charles Heathco, > Concerning the scratchy noise on rec side of the Kx-125. Have you checked > that only one end of the shielded wires are grounded? Ground only (1 ) > one end > of the shielding otherwise you defeat the purpose for the shielding to > give > a path for unwanted emf noise (electrical magnetic force) trying to induce > emf > to other wiring. > Regards Philip Wallace RV4 builder > still > pushing forward > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Charles Heathco" <cheathco(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Intercom's
Date: Nov 19, 2004
Mark, dont know if you have seen my posts re engine noise in Rec side of my kx125. Since you installed and wired your radios yourself thought maybe you would have some Idea what to look for. I tried putting on a filt cap at Alternator, no help. Xmit side is clean. Charlie heathco ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark Kosco" <hooks75(at)msn.com> Subject: Re: RV6-List: Intercom's > > The 3000, 4000 etc are great units. But, two seats, cost, functions, easy > to install, are pluses. I have dual KY-97's, KLN-89B, KT-76A, PM1000II > installed and wired by me. Works great. But it's up to your wallet. > Enjoy. > > Mark > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Jeff Williams > To: rv6-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: Re: RV6-List: Intercom's > > > Actually, the PM3000 is one we have been looking at very closely.. > > Jeff > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <ronlee(at)pcisys.net> > To: > Subject: Re: RV6-List: Intercom's > > >> >> Add to your list the PS Engineering PM3000. I am using the 2000 and am >> happy with it. The 3000 is apparently better. >> >> Ron >> Lee >> >> --------------------------------------------- >> This message was sent using Endymion MailMan. >> http://www.endymion.com/products/mailman/ >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Richard Young" <swso2(at)cox.net>
Subject: Wanted to Buy
Date: Nov 20, 2004
Looking for an RV6 will considerall versions..Rick Young, Serious buyer with cash NOW! 949-916-5082 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: OneFighterPilot(at)aol.com
Date: Nov 20, 2004
Subject: Re: Wanted to Buy
What price range are you thinking about? I have one with fewer than 150 hours but it is several years old, always hangered and is in perfect (in the eyes of this beholder) shape. O-360 with Hartzell CS, slider, fast, well-equipped. It will not be sold cheap. I am having some physical problems and may not be able to return to flying. Bird is currently undergoing some upgrades at FBO, mainly in the cockpit. Located at Spruce Creek Fly-in Community near Daytona Beach. Cheers, Richard Collins ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Richard Young" <swso2(at)cox.net>
Subject: Re: Wanted to Buy
Date: Nov 20, 2004
Richard..Sorry to hear when pilots have medical problems......I'm not looking to steal anybody's airplane..I built one RV 6 and two HARMON Rockets, the last won a LINDY in '98...I sold it four years ago and bought a T210 which sold this morning...What I need can be found between 60 & 68K.....If you have any interest, please send photos...Thanks Rick Young----- Original Message ----- From: <OneFighterPilot(at)aol.com> To: Sent: Saturday, November 20, 2004 12:48 PM Subject: Re: RV6-List: Wanted to Buy > > What price range are you thinking about? I have one with fewer than 150 > hours but it is several years old, always hangered and is in perfect (in the > eyes of this beholder) shape. O-360 with Hartzell CS, slider, fast, > well-equipped. It will not be sold cheap. > > I am having some physical problems and may not be able to return to flying. > Bird is currently undergoing some upgrades at FBO, mainly in the cockpit. > Located at Spruce Creek Fly-in Community near Daytona Beach. > > Cheers, Richard Collins > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "David Burton" <dburton(at)nwlink.com>
Subject: Re: Wanted to Buy
Date: Nov 20, 2004
Here is one: http://www.vansairforce.net/4sale.htm ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Charles Heathco" <cheathco(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Retrofiting P-51 style throtle
Date: Nov 21, 2004
Hiya, I know it can be done, is there a kit abailible, and has anyone here done it. (RV6A) Charlie ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Charles Heathco" <cheathco(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Retrofit strobes
Date: Nov 22, 2004
The 6A I just got has no rotating beacon nor strobes. I think beacon at least might be a legal requirment as all cert aircr have them. Question is, who has retrofitted what? Builder says he ran a wire which is coiled in the tail someplace, so a vert stab tip I think could work. wing tip strobles might be easier but a lot more expensive. Any recomendations? charlie heathco ________________________________________________________________________________
From: <kbob(at)cox.net>
Subject: Re: Retrofit strobes
Date: Nov 22, 2004
I don't think the beacon is a requirement. The Van's kits don't include them for anti-collision. Plus they are barely visible in daylight. You may be able to put the strobe in the top of the VS. You will need to remove the fiberglass tip to mount a single strobe. That is where mine is. You may also use the top and bottom of the fuselage at the baggage bulkhead to mount the strobes (requires 2). Kelly 6A finish > > From: "Charles Heathco" <cheathco(at)comcast.net> > Date: 2004/11/22 Mon AM 08:44:56 EST > To: > Subject: RV6-List: Retrofit strobes > > > The 6A I just got has no rotating beacon nor strobes. I think beacon at > least might be a legal requirment as all cert aircr have them. Question is, > who has retrofitted what? Builder says he ran a wire which is coiled in the > tail someplace, so a vert stab tip I think could work. wing tip strobles > might be easier but a lot more expensive. Any recomendations? charlie > heathco > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 22, 2004
From: Phil Birkelbach <phil(at)petrasoft.net>
Subject: Re: Intercom's
I love my DRE-244e. I haven't flown with it yet but I have played the MP3 player through it and listened to people in the traffic pattern at IWS. Sounds awesome!! Godspeed, Phil Birkelbach - Houston Texas RV-7 N727WB (Reserved) - Panel http://www.myrv7.com Jeff Williams wrote: > >Hey guys- > >My father and I finallyu picked up a 6 and are loving it.. > >However, there are a few things we want to change.. The airplane currently >has one of the "portable" intercom systems.. We're looking for something >decent, 2 place with a music input.. > >So I was curious as to what you guys were using? We've been browsing the >Aircraft Spruce catalog but are still unsure which one to grab.. > >Thanks guys! > >Jeff >N314L > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Charles Heathco" <cheathco(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Oil temp dropping to min.
Date: Nov 26, 2004
Lasttime I was able to get up, I noticed oil temp was lower than norm, Today able to get up again and it never got but just above min. I would intuitivly guess it would be more likely the sender than the guage, but I would like to know if anyone has had this problem? charlie (RV6A) ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Nov 27, 2004
From: Matt Dralle <dralle(at)matronics.com>
Subject: Lister Comments - Please Support The Lists
Dear Listers, Wow! People have been including some very nice comments along with their Contributions lately! I've included another set of below and will send another set in a couple of days. Guys, I really appreciate your kind words and support. In the last few days, the contributions have really started to come in and its looking like support this year may slightly surpass last year's. There's still a few days left in this year's Fund Raiser, so if you've been waiting until the last minute to make your Contribution, now's the time! Make Your Contribution Today: http://www.matronics.com/contribution Thank you! Matt Dralle Email List Administrator ----------------- More of What Listers Are Saying... -------------------- Every morning 5:30 am, coffee and the "List". It's how I start my day. Robert G. The list is still my favorite aviation magazine. Roger H. Great resource, without the distraction of pop ups and ads! Douglas D. I look forward to my daily list reading almost as much as my coffee! Hal K. Great service! Aaron G. I have made some great friends, because of it! Bob D. Great resource!! Richard S. I learn something of value every time I read the messages. Stan S. Great list! Thomas E. Now that I am close to completion of my [homebuilt], I look back and wonder how I could ever have made it this far without [the Lists]. Jeff O. Outstanding site and administration. Anthony S. Great forum for our projects. Darrel M. I have become a List Addict! George M. A very helpful resource for me. Dennis K. Great for staying up on the latest. Forrest L. Valuable benefit for the users. George A. Great tool for all [builders]. Tony M. Can't tell you how much I appreciate the archives. Ken B. I really enjoy the sharing of information and the "discussions" that come up. Ross S. [The List] reminds us home builders that help is just a few clicks away. Danny W. A great resource! Christopher S. Always a pleasure to support this list! Richard W. Thanks for helping all of us build better aircraft. John P. Great list(s)for data, info and making friends. John S. [The] List has helped me much with my building process. Raimo T. Matt G Dralle | Matronics | PO Box 347 | Livermore | CA | 94551 925-606-1001 V | 925-606-6281 F | dralle(at)matronics.com Email http://www.matronics.com/ WWW | Featuring Products For Aircraft ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 18, 2004
Subject: [ Jim Jewell ] : New Email List Photo Share Available!
From: Email List Photo Shares <pictures(at)matronics.com>
A new Email List Photo Share is available: Poster: Jim Jewell Subject: RV6-A lower cowl engine air intake seal http://www.matronics.com/photoshare/jjewell@telus.net.12.18.2004/index.html o Main Photo Share Index http://www.matronics.com/photoshare o Submitting a Photo Share If you wish to submit a Photo Share of your own, please include the following information along with your email message and files: 1) Email List or Lists that they are related to: 2) Your Full Name: 3) Your Email Address: 4) One line Subject description: 5) Multi-line, multi-paragraph description of topic: 6) One-line Description of each photo or file: Email the information above and your files and photos to: pictures(at)matronics.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Brunke" <jwbrunk(at)attglobal.net>
Subject: Fuel cap
Date: Dec 19, 2004
Fellow RV'ers, What do you use to lube the "O" ring on the fuel cap. I have some DC-4 compound, but not sure if you can use that around fuel. Thanks in advance, John Brunke N215KC, RV-6 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 19, 2004
From: Dan DeNeal <rv6apilot(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Fuel cap
John, I have been using fuel lube around the "O" ring. Wicks sells it in a squeeze tube. Should last you a life time. Dan DeNeal RV6a - N256GD 194 hrs 1.5yrs John Brunke wrote: Fellow RV'ers, What do you use to lube the "O" ring on the fuel cap. I have some DC-4 compound, but not sure if you can use that around fuel. Thanks in advance, John Brunke N215KC, RV-6 ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Dec 31, 2004
Subject: [ Kelly Patterson ] : New Email List Photo Share Available!
From: Email List Photo Shares <pictures(at)matronics.com>
A new Email List Photo Share is available: Poster: Kelly Patterson Subject: Tailcone baggage compartment http://www.matronics.com/photoshare/kbob@cox.net.12.31.2004/index.html o Main Photo Share Index http://www.matronics.com/photoshare o Submitting a Photo Share If you wish to submit a Photo Share of your own, please include the following information along with your email message and files: 1) Email List or Lists that they are related to: 2) Your Full Name: 3) Your Email Address: 4) One line Subject description: 5) Multi-line, multi-paragraph description of topic: 6) One-line Description of each photo or file: Email the information above and your files and photos to: pictures(at)matronics.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Clark, Thomas M UTPWR" <Tom.Clark(at)UTCFuelCells.com>
rv8-list(at)matronics.com, rv9-list(at)matronics.com, rv-list(at)matronics.com, Mid-AtlRVwing(at)yahoogroups.com, rv8list(at)yahoogroups.com, BostonRVBuilders(at)yahoogroups.com
Subject: RV-8 Fastback
Date: Jan 06, 2005
Groups, I have had a bunch of questions about my modified RV-8 Fastback which was completed mid. last year. I now have a web site that should answer many of the questions about this modification. Try the link below. Thanks, Tom RV8 Fastback, N525TC, 75 hours http://members.cox.net/rv8fastback Tom Clark 860-727-2287 Office 860-604-5826 Cell 860-998-9811 Fax e-mail: tom.clark(at)utcfuelcells.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: dralle(at)matronics.com (Matt Dralle)
Date: Jan 07, 2005
Subject: [PLEASE READ NOW] - Addressing Upgrade At Matronics TONIGHT!
Dear Listers, Service Provider to upgrade to a larger IP subnet. I will be re-addressing all of the machines on the network including the Matronics Web Server and Matronics Email Server at that time. Name Service will be updated at that time as well and most things should work again pretty quick. There may be some bounced email for a few hours or even a day or so as the new name-to-ip-address resolutions propagate into the depths of the Internet. If you have problems posting a message to one of the Lists or get a bounced message back, please wait a couple of hours and try sending it again. Generally, access to the web site should work within 1-hour of Hopefully the transition will go smoothly and you'll hardly even notice! :-) Thanks for your patience! Matt Dralle List Administrator -- Matt G. Dralle | Matronics | P.O. Box 347 | Livermore | CA | 94551 925-606-1001 Voice | 925-606-6281 FAX | dralle(at)matronics.com Email http://www.matronics.com/ W.W.W. | Featuring Products For Aircraft ________________________________________________________________________________
From: MnwPeeps(at)aol.com
Date: Jan 20, 2005
Subject: RV6A parts
Anybody have a nose-gear strut to sell me? I got two names earlier (in New England), but have lost the info. I also need wheel pants for the nose gear, and a prop spinner. Thanks - Mike ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Normanjd(at)aol.com
Date: Jan 24, 2005
Subject: plenum design
I am constructing an aluminum plenum using photos obtained on this website. The photos did not show how to seal between the plenum and cowl inlets on my RV6 cowl. I am using the standard RV6 cowl. I would appreciate some photos of how you have transitioned and sealed the area. I think a lower seal of rubber is easy enough but how do you attach the upper seal? ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Martin Hone" <mctrader(at)bigpond.net.au>
Subject: Re : plenum sealing..
Date: Jan 25, 2005
Hi Norman, I made an enclosed plenum using the Van's Baffle Kit, but added my own aluminum cover plate. The inlets use baffle rubber/silicone seals bent around the shape of the upper cowl so as to form a seal similar to the lower cowl seals. None of them are particularly efficient or even attractive, but they are effective enough, and I have had absolutely no cooling problems, even with a factory new engine and 45 degree C days ( over 100 deg F) Make sure you seal all the other gaps with hi-temp silicone and you will be fine. I added small dams in front of the cylinders to even out the temps, but the front left baffle mounted oil cooler keeps the oil too cool most days. Martin in Oz -----Original Message----- From: owner-rv6-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv6-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of RV6-List Digest Server Subject: RV6-List Digest: 1 Msgs - 01/24/05 * ================================================== Online Versions of Today's List Digest Archive ================================================== Today's complete RV6-List Digest can also be found in either of the two Web Links listed below. The .html file includes the Digest formatted in HTML for viewing with a web browser and features Hyperlinked Indexes and Message Navigation. The .txt file includes the plain ASCII version of the RV6-List Digest and can be viewed with a generic text editor such as Notepad or with a web browser. HTML Version: http://www.matronics.com/digest/rv6-list/Digest.RV6-List.2005-01-24.html Text Version: http://www.matronics.com/digest/rv6-list/Digest.RV6-List.2005-01-24.txt ================================================ EMail Version of Today's List Digest Archive ================================================ RV6-List Digest Archive --- Total Messages Posted Mon 01/24/05: 1 Today's Message Index: ---------------------- 1. 07:31 AM - plenum design (Normanjd(at)aol.com) ________________________________ Message 1 _____________________________________ From: Normanjd(at)aol.com Subject: RV6-List: plenum design I am constructing an aluminum plenum using photos obtained on this website. The photos did not show how to seal between the plenum and cowl inlets on my RV6 cowl. I am using the standard RV6 cowl. I would appreciate some photos of how you have transitioned and sealed the area. I think a lower seal of rubber is easy enough but how do you attach the upper seal? advertising on the Matronics Forums. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: PeterHunt1(at)aol.com
Date: Jan 25, 2005
Subject: Plemum design
Norman, I just finished my aluminum plenum. Worked out really nice. I don't have pictures yet, but perhaps a brief written answer to your asking how to tie the cowl in will help. On the lower cowl I made a removable rubber strip which screws under the inlet and up each side ("U" shaped). Under the rubber strip is an aluminum backing strip with four nutplates. The four #6 countersunk stainless steel screws (each side with no tinnerman washers) and the backing strip remain attached to the lower cowl at all times. The lower cowl is installed without the rubber strip. Once installed the rubber strip is slipped in between the lower edge of the inlet and the backing strip. The rubber strip has "V's" cut in it to guide in around the screws and center it properly. Then the screws (unpainted stainless steel) are tightened before the top cowl is installed holding the rubber strip tightly in place. The top cowl air intake opening has a similar rubber strip and backing plate with nutplates, except it remains permanently in place (with cad plated and painted #6 countersunk screws). It just goes across the top (not down the sides) of the opening. On both the top and bottom cowl the rubber is on the underside of the inlets of the cowl and rests on the inside of the aluminum making up the baffles and plenum. Therefore, when installing the top cowl I must use my finger tips to pull the rubber down into the inside (underside) of the plenum. My baffling and plenum come within one quarter inch of the inside (rear) edge of the cowl inlet. It was a lot of work, but I have a beautiful fit with room for the engine to vibrate around the rubber seals. Good luck Pete in Clearwater RV-6 N216PH, Getting ready to start engine ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Brunke" <jwbrunk(at)attglobal.net>
Subject: High oil and fuel pressure
Date: Jan 27, 2005
Most of you folks are good at problem solving. I think I know the answer but here's the situation. Flew my RV-6 with an O-320 last week. Air temperature was 6 degrees F. Oil temp never made it above 150 degrees. As I leveled off and the fixed pitch prop rpm came up to normal cruise, the oil pressure came up to just below or at red line and fluctuating about 2 to 3 psi. I reduced RPM to 1700 and slowly came back in to land and the pressure stayed around 85 psi (red line is 90). In the pattern when my airspeed was back below 100 mph the oil pressure was in its normal range around 80psi. Ok, it was a really cold day. So I'm thinking that the oil cooler was getting too much air flow. I was able to block 1/2 of the air flow and flew a couple of days later when it was in the high 30's. Flight went great. Went flying today and the air temp was 23 degrees. Even with half the airflow to the cooler blocked the pressure fluctuation up near red line occurred again. This aircraft has Van's engine gauges and I was also venturing that the transducer might be bad, but during these high oil pressure indications the fuel pressure would also rise. They would rise at the same points. I'm concerned because redline for fuel pressure is 8 psi and the indication at one point was 12 psi. So, has anyone run into too much cooling for oil and if so did it also affect your fuel pressure? Also, I am concerned about the fuel pressure excursion above red line. What specifically do you think I should check? I took the cowl off after today's flight and did not notice any leaks. The engine was about 45 degrees F when I started it. It is kept in a heated hanger so the oil was not at ambient temperature when I started it. I would appreciate your comments. John Brunke St. Charles, IL ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Charles Heathco" <cheathco(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: High oil and fuel pressure
Date: Jan 27, 2005
John, about the only thing I can think of that would raise fuel pressure would be blocked tank vents, but you say it flucuated with oil pressure. strange indeed. I am also on cherokee chat with O-320 problems discussed regularly, I dont remember seeing your particualar problem come up. As for oil cooling, mine never gets above 180- and when high and cold it stays around 145-150. I have considered blocking some of air flow as you have but have not yet done so.I will post your problem and see if can get something for you. charlie heathco ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Brunke" <jwbrunk(at)attglobal.net> Subject: RV6-List: High oil and fuel pressure Most of you folks are good at problem solving. I think I know the answer but here's the situation. Flew my RV-6 with an O-320 last week. Air temperature was 6 degrees F. Oil temp never made it above 150 degrees. As I leveled off and the fixed pitch prop rpm came up to normal cruise, the oil pressure came up to just below or at red line and fluctuating about 2 to 3 psi. I reduced RPM to 1700 and slowly came back in to land and the pressure stayed around 85 psi (red line is 90). In the pattern when my airspeed was back below 100 mph the oil pressure was in its normal range around 80psi. Ok, it was a really cold day. So I'm thinking that the oil cooler was getting too much air flow. I was able to block 1/2 of the air flow and flew a couple of days later when it was in the high 30's. Flight went great. Went flying today and the air temp was 23 degrees. Even with half the airflow to the cooler blocked the pressure fluctuation up near red line occurred again. This aircraft has Van's engine gauges and I was also venturing that the transducer might be bad, but during these high oil pressure indications the fuel pressure would also rise. They would rise at the same points. I'm concerned because redline for fuel pressure is 8 psi and the indication at one point was 12 psi. So, has anyone run into too much cooling for oil and if so did it also affect your fuel pressure? Also, I am concerned about the fuel pressure excursion above red line. What specifically do you think I should check? I took the cowl off after today's flight and did not notice any leaks. The engine was about 45 degrees F when I started it. It is kept in a heated hanger so the oil was not at ambient temperature when I started it. I would appreciate your comments. John Brunke St. Charles, IL ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Kelly Patterson" <kbob(at)cox.net>
Subject: High oil and fuel pressure
Date: Jan 27, 2005
This is a WAG - but it may be a ground problem with the transducers. Is your sender manifold the anodized type? The anodizing does not conduct electricity. Since both the fuel and oil senders are mounted there, they may be seeing the same problem at the same time. Try a star washer under the manifold mount bolt. No idea why you would get so high on the fuel pressure unless something is hairballed. Kelly Patterson PHX, AZ >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-rv6-list-server(at)matronics.com >[mailto:owner-rv6-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of John Brunke >Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2005 5:23 PM >To: rv6-list(at)matronics.com >Subject: RV6-List: High oil and fuel pressure > > >Most of you folks are good at problem solving. I think I know >the answer but here's the situation. > >Flew my RV-6 with an O-320 last week. Air temperature was 6 >degrees F. Oil temp never made it above 150 degrees. As I >leveled off and the fixed pitch prop rpm came up to normal >cruise, the oil pressure came up to just below or at red line >and fluctuating about 2 to 3 psi. I reduced RPM to >1700 and slowly came back in to land and the pressure stayed >around 85 psi (red line is 90). In the pattern when my >airspeed was back below >100 mph the oil pressure was in its normal range around 80psi. > >Ok, it was a really cold day. So I'm thinking that the oil >cooler was getting too much air flow. I was able to block 1/2 >of the air flow and flew a couple of days later when it was in >the high 30's. Flight went great. > >Went flying today and the air temp was 23 degrees. Even with >half the airflow to the cooler blocked the pressure >fluctuation up near red line occurred again. > >This aircraft has Van's engine gauges and I was also venturing >that the transducer might be bad, but during these high oil >pressure indications the fuel pressure >would also rise. They would rise at the same points. I'm >concerned because redline for fuel pressure is 8 psi and the >indication at one point was 12 psi. > >So, has anyone run into too much cooling for oil and if so did >it also affect your fuel pressure? > >Also, I am concerned about the fuel pressure excursion above >red line. What specifically do you think I should check? I >took the cowl off after today's flight and did not notice any leaks. > >The engine was about 45 degrees F when I started it. It is >kept in a heated hanger so the oil was not at ambient >temperature when I started it. > >I would appreciate your comments. > >John Brunke >St. Charles, IL > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 28, 2005
From: "Thomas Law" <tlaw(at)klondiker.com>
Subject: Re: High oil and fuel pressure
John, I think you may have a poor ground between the instruments and the transducers. They are affected by very very small voltage chages in the ground path. One quick check you can do for the panel ground .......turn on all the electrics one at a time (engine off), inc. radios (recieve and transmit) , panel lights, power points, etc, and make sure the gauges stay at "0". There may be some very slight movement as the system voltage will be changing. Tom Law RV6A, Whitehorse, Yukon ---------- Original Message ---------------------------------- From: "John Brunke" <jwbrunk(at)attglobal.net> Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 18:22:41 -0600 > >Most of you folks are good at problem solving. I think I know the answer but here's the situation. > >Flew my RV-6 with an O-320 last week. Air temperature was 6 degrees F. Oil temp never made it above 150 degrees. As I leveled off and the >fixed pitch prop rpm came up to normal cruise, the oil pressure came up to just below or at red line and fluctuating about 2 to 3 psi. I reduced RPM to >1700 and slowly came back in to land and the pressure stayed around 85 psi (red line is 90). In the pattern when my airspeed was back below >100 mph the oil pressure was in its normal range around 80psi. > >Ok, it was a really cold day. So I'm thinking that the oil cooler was getting too much air flow. I was able to block 1/2 of the air flow and flew a couple >of days later when it was in the high 30's. Flight went great. > >Went flying today and the air temp was 23 degrees. Even with half the airflow to the cooler blocked the pressure fluctuation up near red line occurred again. > >This aircraft has Van's engine gauges and I was also venturing that the transducer might be bad, but during these high oil pressure indications the fuel pressure >would also rise. They would rise at the same points. I'm concerned because redline for fuel pressure is 8 psi and the indication at one point was 12 psi. > >So, has anyone run into too much cooling for oil and if so did it also affect your fuel pressure? > >Also, I am concerned about the fuel pressure excursion above red line. What specifically do you think I should check? I took the cowl off after today's flight >and did not notice any leaks. > >The engine was about 45 degrees F when I started it. It is kept in a heated hanger so the oil was not at ambient temperature when I started it. > >I would appreciate your comments. > >John Brunke >St. Charles, IL > > Sent via the WebMail system at klondiker.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jan 28, 2005
From: "Thomas Law" <tlaw(at)klondiker.com>
Subject: Re: High oil and fuel pressure
John, I think you may have a poor ground between the instruments and the transducers. They are affected by very very small voltage chages in the ground path. One quick check you can do for the panel ground .......turn on all the electrics one at a time (engine off), inc. radios (recieve and transmit) , panel lights, power points, etc, and make sure the gauges stay at "0". There may be some very slight movement as the system voltage will be changing. Tom Law RV6A, Whitehorse, Yukon ---------- Original Message ---------------------------------- From: "John Brunke" <jwbrunk(at)attglobal.net> Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 18:22:41 -0600 > >Most of you folks are good at problem solving. I think I know the answer but here's the situation. > >Flew my RV-6 with an O-320 last week. Air temperature was 6 degrees F. Oil temp never made it above 150 degrees. As I leveled off and the >fixed pitch prop rpm came up to normal cruise, the oil pressure came up to just below or at red line and fluctuating about 2 to 3 psi. I reduced RPM to >1700 and slowly came back in to land and the pressure stayed around 85 psi (red line is 90). In the pattern when my airspeed was back below >100 mph the oil pressure was in its normal range around 80psi. > >Ok, it was a really cold day. So I'm thinking that the oil cooler was getting too much air flow. I was able to block 1/2 of the air flow and flew a couple >of days later when it was in the high 30's. Flight went great. > >Went flying today and the air temp was 23 degrees. Even with half the airflow to the cooler blocked the pressure fluctuation up near red line occurred again. > >This aircraft has Van's engine gauges and I was also venturing that the transducer might be bad, but during these high oil pressure indications the fuel pressure >would also rise. They would rise at the same points. I'm concerned because redline for fuel pressure is 8 psi and the indication at one point was 12 psi. > >So, has anyone run into too much cooling for oil and if so did it also affect your fuel pressure? > >Also, I am concerned about the fuel pressure excursion above red line. What specifically do you think I should check? I took the cowl off after today's flight >and did not notice any leaks. > >The engine was about 45 degrees F when I started it. It is kept in a heated hanger so the oil was not at ambient temperature when I started it. > >I would appreciate your comments. > >John Brunke >St. Charles, IL > > Sent via the WebMail system at klondiker.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Feb 14, 2005
From: Peter Gorman <106365.3572(at)compuserve.com>
Subject: Visiting Florida - aerobatics?
Hi there, I am new to this list. I will be visiting Florida from Ireland in early April for some flying and Sun and Fun, together with a friend. We operate an RV-6 in Europe (circa 300 hours to date), and would like if possible to make contact with an RV-6 operator in the Ocala/Leesburg area who would discuss his (or her!) techniques for light aerobatics so we could learn some new stuff ! Regards Peter Gorman ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Sherri & Paul Richardson" <prichar(at)mail.win.org>
Subject: Buying an RV-6 or 6A
Date: Mar 04, 2005
0.31 SUBJ_BUY Subject line starts with Buy or Buying Hello All, I'd like to buy an RV-6/6A, VFR/IFR. 160 or 180 HP, Lycoming or Superior, CS/FP. Like to keep it lowest cost, but will consider a higher cost IFR airplane. Paul Richardson ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Robert E. Lynch" <rv6lynch(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: Buying an RV-6 or 6A
Date: Mar 04, 2005
Hi Sherri and Paul I have an RV 6 that I am thinking of selling. Its a 180HP with fixed pitch Sensenich an IFR certified, 460TTA/C and Engine. Asking $84,000, if your are interested let me know off list. The Radios are all King Silver Crown. Bob Lynch ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Sherri & Paul Richardson" <prichar(at)mail.win.org>
Subject: 150 HP RV-6 Density Altitude
Date: Mar 15, 2005
Hi All, I'm considering buying a 150 HP RV-6, and was wondering if anyone has experience operating in Colorado highlands with that configuration? Thanks, Paul Richardson ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Mar 15, 2005
From: Ron Lee <ronlee(at)pcisys.net>
Subject: Re: 150 HP RV-6 Density Altitude
> >Hi All, >I'm considering buying a 150 HP RV-6, and was wondering if anyone has >experience operating in Colorado highlands with that configuration? My biased opinion is 180 HP. That is what I have. 150 HP in an RV may perform better than a Cessna 172 but I think you may regret it. Email me at ronlee(at)pcisys.net and if you are close enough we can go ride in mine. Ron ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Glenn Brasch" <gbrasch(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Van's Aircraft Belt Buckles For Sale
Date: Mar 18, 2005
I have high quality "Van's Aircraft - Total Performance" belt buckles for sale. I have also recently updated my site with better pictures, and customer comments. Please check them out at: http://home.earthlink.net/~gbrasch/ Thank you, Glenn Brasch, Tucson RV-9A fuselage ________________________________________________________________________________
From: CRASHOCONNOR(at)aol.com
Date: Mar 20, 2005
Subject: Re: 150 HP RV-6 Density Altitude
In a message dated 3/15/2005 7:22:33 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, prichar(at)mail.win.org writes: Paul, I owned a 150 hp RV6A in Phoenix Arizona. I flew to Sedona quite a few times which was at 5000 ft of altitude. When it was hot it seemed like it took forever to get off the ground. The runway is 5000 ft long, and I was never in danger of not getting it off the ground in time, but it felt like it was taking forever(I never used more than half the runway). The other thing I can tell you is that I flew with a great group of fellow RVers(they all had 180 hp planes and most had constant speed props) and felt like I was in a Cessna all over again. If you can afford a bigger engine and a constant speed prop you will be much happier than if you save money and get the smaller engine. I was always thinking about how to increase the power in my engine. This is another way to get more power without getting the larger engine, and it's a lot less expensive than buying a 360 engine.The other thing you can do is work on speed modifications on the plane itself such as wing root faring's and just cleaning up any drag problems you may have. But if a 150 hp engine is all you can afford, get it anyway. After all it's an RV. And you just can't beat that. Good luck with your plane. Mike O'Connor N811RF --> RV6-List message posted by: "Sherri & Paul Richardson" Hi All, I'm considering buying a 150 HP RV-6, and was wondering if anyone has experience operating in Colorado highlands with that configuration? Thanks, Paul Richardson ________________________________________________________________________________
From: MnwPeeps(at)aol.com
Date: Apr 01, 2005
Subject: What parts do I need?
New owner here, in need of parts. I find the Vans site intimidating for parts (the list has thousands on it). I need (1) engine mounts. Vans says four pairs, but when they show a price, it's $68 for, they say, one. Is that one mount, or one pair? Seems rather high, in any case. (2) The sleeve, or whatever it's properly called, that fits over the new nose gear strut I acquired. I attempted "nose gear strut sleeve" on the Vans site, with zero result. (3) I need the bracket, attachment, or whatever it is (haven't seen it), that is on the bottom of the cowl, about 18 inches aft of the prop, that either attaches the cowl haves to each other, or attaches the cowl to the fuselage. Even the builder of this a/c (who's built a second one) has been unable to tell me what this is, hence my inability to order. I will buy any of these from owners, if you have them. Thanks - Chuck ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Tom and Marilyn Law" <tlaw(at)klondiker.com>
Subject: Re: What parts do I need?
Date: Apr 01, 2005
Chuck, The only way to be sure of getting the RIGHT parts the first time is to get the number of the part from the aircraft drawing sheets and then look up the part number on Van's web page ... choose "The List" for RV specific parts and the online catalogue for the rest. $68.00 sound about right for one (pair) mount. You will have to order the hardware (bolts) for the mounts as well as they do not come with the mounts. Tom Law 6A Whitehorse, Yukon, Can. ----- Original Message ----- > > New owner here, in need of parts. I find the Vans site intimidating for > parts (the list has thousands on it). I need (1) engine mounts. Vans says four > pairs, but when they show a price, it's $68 for, they say, one. Is that one > mount, or one pair? Seems rather high, in any case. (2) The sleeve, or whatever > it's properly called, that fits over the new nose gear strut I acquired. I > attempted "nose gear strut sleeve" on the Vans site, with zero result. (3) I > need the bracket, attachment, or whatever it is (haven't seen it), that is on > the bottom of the cowl, about 18 inches aft of the prop, that either attaches > the cowl haves to each other, or attaches the cowl to the fuselage. Even the > builder of this a/c (who's built a second one) has been unable to tell me > what this is, hence my inability to order. I will buy any of these from owners, > if you have them. > > Thanks > - Chuck ________________________________________________________________________________
From: <kbob(at)cox.net>
Subject: Re: What parts do I need?
Date: Apr 01, 2005
Hi Chuck, Pretty sure the motor mount is for a pair. The rubber mounts are different thickness on front and back and you can't interchange them, so you won't buy 2 to make a pair. You buy them as a set. I would suggest a set of plans - preview or full size - that have the parts, their numbers, and how to install them shown on them. You could also get with another builder and check his plans out. A 7 is almost identical and in most cases a little easier or better. Post your location and see if someone local can help you out. Also a good idea to use the regular 'RV' list not the 'RV6' list. This one is practically dead - and most RV info is now universal. Kelly Patterson RV-6A hanging motor soon PHX, AZ > > From: MnwPeeps(at)aol.com > Date: 2005/04/01 Fri PM 12:45:16 EST > To: rv6-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: RV6-List: What parts do I need? > > > New owner here, in need of parts. I find the Vans site intimidating for > parts (the list has thousands on it). I need (1) engine mounts. Vans says four > pairs, but when they show a price, it's $68 for, they say, one. Is that one > mount, or one pair? Seems rather high, in any case. (2) The sleeve, or whatever > it's properly called, that fits over the new nose gear strut I acquired. I > attempted "nose gear strut sleeve" on the Vans site, with zero result. (3) I > need the bracket, attachment, or whatever it is (haven't seen it), that is on > the bottom of the cowl, about 18 inches aft of the prop, that either attaches > the cowl haves to each other, or attaches the cowl to the fuselage. Even the > builder of this a/c (who's built a second one) has been unable to tell me > what this is, hence my inability to order. I will buy any of these from owners, > if you have them. > > Thanks > - Chuck > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Apr 02, 2005
From: mnwpeeps(at)aol.com
Subject: Re: What parts do I need?
Dear Kelly - Many thanks for the reply and the good information - useful. I've heard back from four guys, all with slightly different - but good - information. This sure is a useful site. I will act upon your reccos. Regards - Chuck -----Original Message----- From: kbob(at)cox.net Subject: Re: RV6-List: What parts do I need? Hi Chuck, Pretty sure the motor mount is for a pair. The rubber mounts are different thickness on front and back and you can't interchange them, so you won't buy 2 to make a pair. You buy them as a set. I would suggest a set of plans - preview or full size - that have the parts, their numbers, and how to install them shown on them. You could also get with another builder and check his plans out. A 7 is almost identical and in most cases a little easier or better. Post your location and see if someone local can help you out. Also a good idea to use the regular 'RV' list not the 'RV6' list. This one is practically dead - and most RV info is now universal. Kelly Patterson RV-6A hanging motor soon PHX, AZ > > From: MnwPeeps(at)aol.com > Date: 2005/04/01 Fri PM 12:45:16 EST > To: rv6-list(at)matronics.com > Subject: RV6-List: What parts do I need? > > > New owner here, in need of parts. I find the Vans site intimidating for > parts (the list has thousands on it). I need (1) engine mounts. Vans says four > pairs, but when they show a price, it's $68 for, they say, one. Is that one > mount, or one pair? Seems rather high, in any case. (2) The sleeve, or whatever > it's properly called, that fits over the new nose gear strut I acquired. I > attempted "nose gear strut sleeve" on the Vans site, with zero result. (3) I > need the bracket, attachment, or whatever it is (haven't seen it), that is on > the bottom of the cowl, about 18 inches aft of the prop, that either attaches > the cowl haves to each other, or attaches the cowl to the fuselage. Even the > builder of this a/c (who's built a second one) has been unable to tell me > what this is, hence my inability to order. I will buy any of these from owners, > if you have them. > > Thanks > - Chuck > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Jerry2DT(at)aol.com
Date: Apr 03, 2005
Subject: Re:What parts do I need?
Hi Chuck, I'm building a -6a which came with the old plans. When it came to the stuff forward of the firewall, I bought a set of RV7a preview plans which are much better, show exploded views, parts numbers, etc. These are virtually identical to the -6a and would help you I am sure. I would advise you to call Van's and ask for Dale, he's a guy I know personally, (I live 10 min. from Van's) and is probably their main parts guy. I'd call him after Monday as they are always the busiest then. Those preview plans I believe are $25 or so and worth it, IMO. Hope this helps and welcome to the RV world. Jerry Cochran Wilsonville, OR From: MnwPeeps(at)aol.com Subject: RV6-List: What parts do I need? New owner here, in need of parts. I find the Vans site intimidating for parts (the list has thousands on it). I need (1) engine mounts. Vans says four pairs, but when they show a price, it's $68 for, they say, one. Is that one mount, or one pair? Seems rather high, in any case. (2) The sleeve, or whatever it's properly called, that fits over the new nose gear strut I acquired. I attempted "nose gear strut sleeve" on the Vans site, with zero result. (3) I need the bracket, attachment, or whatever it is (haven't seen it), that is on the bottom of the cowl, about 18 inches aft of the prop, that either attaches the cowl haves to each other, or attaches the cowl to the fuselage. Even the builder of this a/c (who's built a second one) has been unable to tell me what this is, hence my inability to order. I will buy any of these from owners, if you have them. Thanks - Chuck ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Apr 16, 2005
From: Matt Dralle <dralle(at)matronics.com>
Subject: [Please Read] Matronics Email Server Upgrade...
Dear Listers, I will be upgrading the Matronics Email Server this weekend. This includes some hardware improvements - more memory, faster, more capable processors - as well as a complete operating system upgrade from scratch. I hope to have both the old system and the new system running at the same time to minimize the actual impact of the upgrade. Hopefully there will be little actual downtime during the transition, but a few posts may get lost in the shuffle. If you don't see your post show up on the List in the normal amount of time (plus a little bit), then please just try posting it again. Upgrading the Matronics Email Server operating system (from Redhat Linux 7.2 to Redhat Linux WS 4) is a sizeable undertaking and requires a great deal of work to port all of the utilities, programs, and scripts over to the new system. As I've already mentioned, both the old and new systems will be on line at the same time, so interruption should be held to an absolute minimal. You might see a couple of odd test messages during the cut-over or other odd messages; please just ignore them. I have setup a new System Status Web Page that I will use to update List Members on the current status of the email and web systems. Please refer to it as often as you like: http://www.matronics.com/SystemStatus/ Thank you for your continued support of the List Services at Matronics! Its your yearly Contributions that make these major upgrades possible! Best regards, Matt Dralle Matronics Email List Administrator ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Apr 17, 2005
From: Matt Dralle <dralle(at)matronics.com>
Subject: [Please Read] Matronics Email Server Upgrade Complete!
Dear Listers, The upgrade of the Matronics Email Server can be considered complete at this time. All known issues related to the upgrade process have been resolved and email services are running normal. The Nightly Digest processing has not yet been tested and will wait for tonight's update. If you encounter any odd behavior with respect to the Matronics Email Server over the next few days, please contact me via email at dralle(at)matronics.com or if that fails try dralle(at)speakeasy.net. Thanks to everyone for being patient through this arduous process of a major system upgrade! Matt Dralle Email List Administrator At 12:37 PM 4/16/2005 Saturday, Matt Dralle wrote: >Dear Listers, > >I will be upgrading the Matronics Email Server this weekend. This >includes some hardware improvements - more memory, faster, more capable >processors - as well as a complete operating system upgrade from >scratch. I hope to have both the old system and the new system running at >the same time to minimize the actual impact of the upgrade. > >Hopefully there will be little actual downtime during the transition, but >a few posts may get lost in the shuffle. If you don't see your post show >up on the List in the normal amount of time (plus a little bit), then >please just try posting it again. > >Upgrading the Matronics Email Server operating system (from Redhat Linux >7.2 to Redhat Linux WS 4) is a sizeable undertaking and requires a great >deal of work to port all of the utilities, programs, and scripts over to >the new system. As I've already mentioned, both the old and new systems >will be on line at the same time, so interruption should be held to an >absolute minimal. You might see a couple of odd test messages during the >cut-over or other odd messages; please just ignore them. > >I have setup a new System Status Web Page that I will use to update List >Members on the current status of the email and web systems. Please refer >to it as often as you like: > > http://www.matronics.com/SystemStatus/ > > >Thank you for your continued support of the List Services at >Matronics! Its your yearly Contributions that make these major upgrades >possible! > >Best regards, > >Matt Dralle >Matronics Email List Administrator Matt G Dralle | Matronics | PO Box 347 | Livermore | CA | 94551 925-606-1001 V | 925-606-6281 F | dralle(at)matronics.com Email http://www.matronics.com/ WWW | Featuring Products For Aircraft ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: May 02, 2005
Subject: [ Mike Holland ] : New Email List Photo Share Available!
From: Email List Photo Shares <pictures(at)matronics.com>
A new Email List Photo Share is available: Poster: Mike Holland Lists: RV-List,RV6-List,RV7-List,RV8-List,RV9-List,RV10-List Subject: Quickbuild Fuel Pickup Issue http://www.matronics.com/photoshare/hollandm@pacbell.net.05.02.2005/index.html o Main Photo Share Index http://www.matronics.com/photoshare o Submitting a Photo Share If you wish to submit a Photo Share of your own, please include the following information along with your email message and files: 1) Email List or Lists that they are related to: 2) Your Full Name: 3) Your Email Address: 4) One line Subject description: 5) Multi-line, multi-paragraph description of topic: 6) One-line Description of each photo or file: Email the information above and your files and photos to: pictures(at)matronics.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 14, 2005
From: pat morency <acwrench(at)yahoo.ca>
Subject: F684 gusset, RV-6
To All, Head scratching time!!! Trying to mount the F684 gusset on the lower longeron (large one). If fitted from the outboard side in between the skin and longeron the WD603 engine mount interferes with the gusset. Is the F684 gusset bent or cut in any way b/4 mounting? DWG#31 detail "E" appears to show the gusset on the outside going low enough to "take in" the cross brace and the engine mount WD603. Any suggestions appreciated!! Regards, Patrick in Calgary ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 18, 2005
Subject: [ Henry Hore ] : New Email List Photo Share Available!
From: Email List Photo Shares <pictures(at)matronics.com>
A new Email List Photo Share is available: Poster: Henry Hore <elsa-henry@darlor-watch.com> Lists: RV-List,RV6-List,RV7-List,RV8-List,RV9-List Subject: Leveling RV6-A Fuselage http://www.matronics.com/photoshare/elsa-henry@darlor-watch.com.06.18.2005/index.html o Main Photo Share Index http://www.matronics.com/photoshare o Submitting a Photo Share If you wish to submit a Photo Share of your own, please include the following information along with your email message and files: 1) Email List or Lists that they are related to: 2) Your Full Name: 3) Your Email Address: 4) One line Subject description: 5) Multi-line, multi-paragraph description of topic: 6) One-line Description of each photo or file: Email the information above and your files and photos to: pictures(at)matronics.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jun 22, 2005
From: "Ralph E. Capen" <recapen(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Bigger tires for 6A on grass?
Fellow listers, I am trying to determine if there are benefits to going with larger tires/rims for grass strip use. I am in the process of relocating to eastern MD / southern DE and there are a bunch of grass strips out here - with better potential for acquiring hangaring facilities... Your thoughts please. Ralph Capen ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Mcmahon" <rv6(at)earthlink.net>
"JIMMY EDWARDS" , "DOUG ESHELMAN" , "Tom Eyssen" , "Dave Hudgins" , "Janet" , "CHUCK JENKJINS" , , "BILL LOGUE" , "Mancini" , "Joe Mckervey" , "JOHN MILLER" , "ALLEN MOLLEYHORN" , "Piper, Gary" , , "EDD \(2003\) TECK" , "TOBY" , "Tommy Walker" , "Winans, Dave W" , "JOHN WOODALL"
Subject: First Flight N863JJ
Date: Jun 23, 2005
First flight of Kit #22411 RV6 at Portland,Tn (1M5) on the 22nd at 0732..This was a 13 year project,the old slow kit ..Thanks to the RV list,Gary V, and Sam B's Web site..I used the EAA first flight guide lines,which is a must do if you can...Flight time was only 20 min,but SWEET...Mistakes that I made!!! 1Check everything 3 times in the Eng,oil line,gas lines,etc... 2Hart C/S got ahead of me when it un/loaded on take off(2780) WHEW After take off,stayed in the pattern and trim out and say to myself (WOW)...did I do this..(JAMES 1:17) Then things started to change after about 18 min,the VM1000 oil pressure gauge which was 80# was showing a TREND down,76,1 min later 71,65,60,53, radio to ground crew coming down ,landed 3 point ,and when it slowed down in the roll out I see smoke but I still have oil pressure 38# shut it down in front of the hanger and this plane looks like a Red chili pepper dipped it olive oil!! Lift top Cowl ,open top of plenum cover and the flange to the prop gov line loose....This has never leaked at any point doing run ups etc(check every line 3 times with a wrench)I had put 7 qts in just in case!!It dumped 3 Qts pretty sudden.. I have made the prop hub adj fine pitch ..put in the 3 qts and ready to go up again ....Oh well thats why they call it first test flight!!! The what I have so far info.. Eng is 0360 A1A Aero sport Lightspeed right side Empty weight1142 Inst PanelLaird Owens Seats and uplDJ Harts C/S GraphicsFreedom Graphics Paint GuyMe Primer sealer Epoxy Dupont 2510s PPG DBU base coat Torch Red (Vette Red) PPG clear 2021 Some Pic http://www.3gunmatch.com/rv6/rv6.htm ________________________________________________________________________________
From: OneFighterPilot(at)aol.com
Date: Jun 23, 2005
Subject: Remove from mail list
Please do so, and thanks. ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "John Mcmahon" <rv6(at)earthlink.net>
"Graig Plane paint" ,
Subject: Fw: First Flight N863JJ
Date: Jun 23, 2005
----- Original Message ----- From: John Mcmahon Subject: First Flight N863JJ First flight of Kit #22411 RV6 at Portland,Tn (1M5) on the 22nd at 0732..This was a 13 year project,the old slow kit ..Thanks to the RV list,Gary V, and Sam B's Web site..I used the EAA first flight guide lines,which is a must do if you can...Flight time was only 20 min,but SWEET...Mistakes that I made!!! 1Check everything 3 times in the Eng,oil line,gas lines,etc... 2Hart C/S got ahead of me when it un/loaded on take off(2780) WHEW After take off,stayed in the pattern and trim out and say to myself (WOW)...did I do this..(JAMES 1:17) Then things started to change after about 18 min,the VM1000 oil pressure gauge which was 80# was showing a TREND down,76,1 min later 71,65,60,53, radio to ground crew coming down ,landed 3 point ,and when it slowed down in the roll out I see smoke but I still have oil pressure 38# shut it down in front of the hanger and this plane looks like a Red chili pepper dipped it olive oil!! Lift top Cowl ,open top of plenum cover and the flange to the prop gov line loose....This has never leaked at any point doing run ups etc(check every line 3 times with a wrench)I had put 7 qts in just in case!!It dumped 3 Qts pretty sudden.. I have made the prop hub adj fine pitch ..put in the 3 qts and ready to go up again ....Oh well thats why they call it first test flight!!! The what I have so far info.. Eng is 0360 A1A Aero sport Lightspeed right side Empty weight1142 Inst PanelLaird Owens Seats and uplDJ Harts C/S GraphicsFreedom Graphics Paint GuyMe Primer sealer Epoxy Dupont 2510s PPG DBU base coat Torch Red (Vette Red) PPG clear 2021 Some Pic http://www.3gunmatch.com/rv6/rv6.htm ________________________________________________________________________________
From: CharlesRV6(at)aol.com
Date: Jun 23, 2005
Subject: Re: RV6-List Digest: 1 Msgs - 06/22/05
Just take off the wheel pants. No problems!!! ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 02, 2005
Subject: [ eanderson(at)carolina.rr.com ] : New Email List Photo Share Available!
From: Email List Photo Shares <pictures(at)matronics.com>
A new Email List Photo Share is available: Poster: eanderson(at)carolina.rr.com Lists: RV-List,RV3-List,RV4-List,RV6-List,RV7-List,RV8-List,RV9-List,RV10-List Subject: Brake Line Failure http://www.matronics.com/photoshare/eanderson@carolina.rr.com.07.02.2005/index.html o Main Photo Share Index http://www.matronics.com/photoshare o Submitting a Photo Share If you wish to submit a Photo Share of your own, please include the following information along with your email message and files: 1) Email List or Lists that they are related to: 2) Your Full Name: 3) Your Email Address: 4) One line Subject description: 5) Multi-line, multi-paragraph description of topic: 6) One-line Description of each photo or file: Email the information above and your files and photos to: pictures(at)matronics.com ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Steve Cooper <sportflyer(at)emcity.net> (SquirrelMail authenticated
user sportflyer) by webmail.emcity.net with HTTP; Sat, 2 Jul 2005 12:40:54.-0600(at)roxy.matronics.com (MDT)
Date: Jul 02, 2005
Subject: looking for engine
I'm looking for a used Rotax 912/912S or new in crate. Have cash ready to purchase. sportflyer(at)emcity.net ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 14, 2005
From: Matt Dralle <dralle(at)matronics.com>
Subject: List Digest Truncation Fixed!!
Dear Listers, I finally figured out today what was causing the occasional truncation of the daily List Digest emails. Seems that every once in a while a message would contain a single "." (period) on line all by itself. The mailers would see this and assume that this was the universal emailer signal for "end of message", and consequently wouldn't process any of the rest of the Digest message. I've put in a filter today to remove any of these sequences so we should be back in business on the Digests. Best regards, Matt Dralle Matronics Email List Admin. Matt G Dralle | Matronics | PO Box 347 | Livermore | CA | 94551 925-606-1001 V | 925-606-6281 F | dralle(at)matronics.com Email http://www.matronics.com/ WWW | Featuring Products For Aircraft ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 14, 2005
From: "Phil Sisson, Litchfield Aerobatic Club" <sisson(at)consolidated.net>
Subject: Oshkosh Bound from South and Midwest
If you are going to Oshkosh, you may want to consider a stop at our little small town airport. 3LF http://www.litchfieldil.com/airport/ take a look at the photography, the young eagle links, the pilot info and then.......... stop over here for a night. Gas is guaranteed at $2.85 a gallon (self service, like at the car gas stations). We have a courtesy car ( old chevy, not pretty. but runs good) No, the gas price is not very good, but it is the best we can do and it will be this price on return trip also. We are about 340 or 350 miles straight south of Oshkosh.. On field camping, and motels within 1 mile walk. restarants, bars, Free overnighting and Admin. bulding will be Kept open for rest rooms and what ever. Sleep in there if you want...... Broadband Internet. Pass this information around to the other lists if you dont mind. Bring your tie downs and ropes that you will need in Oshkosh just in case we would have more than eight planes here. There is plenty of grass for tie downs....... Also Chapter 61, Acro contest will be going on that weekend at Salem Illinois.(about 45 miles southeast) Feel free to stop in there for some great competition and partying.... Phil RV6 flown and tore down now for painting............ Sure wish I had a Pitt's to Fly.......... ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Jul 16, 2005
From: Garey Wittich <gareywittich2000(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: A GUIDE TO AIRCRAFT PAINTING & CORROSION CONTROL
> This Information comes from my own research which I did for > my RV-8A, which I am building. Information applies to both Aluminum and Composite aircraft. This is the 3th printing. > > --------------- ------------- ------------ > > SAVE YOURSELF hundreds of hours of research time and > building time, by using the comprehensive > > "Guide to Painting & Corrosion Control of Aluminum > and > Composite Aircraft" > > This book took over 600+ hours of research time by > me, > a fussy RV-8A Builder. Contains 69 pages of the > latest, practical information - summarized and > gathered from MIL Standards, Paint Shops, Builders > like you (what worked or didn't), Airframe Mfgs, > etc. > Covers products from PP&G, Dupont, Sherwin W'ms, > Sterling, Poly Fiber, Deft, Randolph Paints, PRC De > Soto, US Paints, Aircraft Finishing Systems, 3M, > etc. > > Some of the Topics covered in the 30 Sections are: > * Aircraft Paints vs Auto Paints and Other > Considerations > * Corrosion Control > * Spray Guns - selecting, adjusting, using > and painting problems > * Brushes / Rollers used with Primers & > Paints > * Prep Methods for Painting - Fiberglass, > Steel and Aluminum > * Epoxy Primers for Aluminum - MIL & > Commercial, Solvent & Water Reducible > * Primers for Fiberglass & Steel > * Wash Primers & Self Etching Primers > * Other Primers - Zinc Chromate,Zinc Oxide, > Enamel > * Paint Types: MIL & Non MIL Polyurethanes > Enamel Types > Acrylics - Lacquers & Enamels > * Acid Etch / Conversion Coatings (Alodine) > * Selecting a Paint Shop > * 3M Cleaning Pads, Liquid Cleaner > compatibility > * Paint Booths and their Construction > * References - MIL Standards & Tech Orders > * Directory of Aircraft Paint Mfgs, Distrib- > utors, etc. E-Mail addresses, phone > numbers, Application Notes > > YOUR AIRPLANE is judged by it's Paint Job and it is > costly too, so have the latest "Information" in > order > to make good decisions. Contains plenty of "Do's" > and > "Don'ts" that save you time, money and frustration. > > Send a check for $26 to (includes Postage within the > US) to: > Garey Wittich RV-8A Builder > 58 Village Parkway > Santa Monica, CA. 90405 > > __________________________________ http://mobile.yahoo.com/learn/mail ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Aug 09, 2005
From: Matt Dralle <dralle(at)matronics.com>
Subject:
rv7-list(at)matronics.com, rv8-list(at)matronics.com, rv9-list(at)matronics.com, Listers, Gary VanRemortel just sent me an update to the RV Yeller Pages and it can be found here: http://www.matronics.com/YellerPages/ Thanks Gary!! Matt Dralle Matronics Email List Admin. Matt G Dralle | Matronics | PO Box 347 | Livermore | CA | 94551 925-606-1001 V | 925-606-6281 F | dralle(at)matronics.com Email http://www.matronics.com/ WWW | Featuring Products For Aircraft ________________________________________________________________________________
From: <flyingrv(at)cox.net>
Subject: Heating and Shaping Fiberglass
Date: Aug 30, 2005
Heating and Shaping Fiberglass OK Gang, heres the deal on heating and shaping fiberglass. This is always true with ester resins (more or less) and somewhat true with epoxy (most of the time.) When resins harden they form a molecular, 3 dimensional fishnet looking structure. This fishnet is wrapped, wound, in, over and throughout the fiberglass strands. The fiberglass strands are about the same as the window you are gazing out of wondering why you are reading this. Chemically there are differences, but I dont have a clue just how that works. If you got way down in the strands you would find teeny tiny fibers that look like a barb wire fence made by a guy that went insane putting the barbs on. When you heat this thing up, the molecular bonds weaken in the fishnet and as you bend/reshape the part the fishnet tears apart and the fibers in the glass break because they cannot slide past each other like they could when the resin was a fluid. If you have been following along here, you can see that you just broke the part. You probably cant see it because its more or less on the molecular level, but it is broken. Now the question is are you ever going to care. If it is a no or low stress area it probably isnt going to cause a problem. If its a stressed or vibrated area it will crack after you put that 1OK paint job on. Epoxy is a little different deal, sometimes and sort of. It is more a temperature cure where -ester resin is more related to time. Most -ester laminates will be cured in 24 to 72 hours. The epoxy we use will be hard when it has been to 150 to 175 degrees F. What this says is, if you make a part and it has been to, say 80 degrees you can heat it to 120 degrees and reform it some. The resin will reharden but the glass strands my not like it much. Now experts and engineers dont argue with me! Im old, crotchety, and dont want to be confused by facts. Nevertheless, do feel free to add your thinking to the discussion. Bob Snedaker Fairings-Etc bob@fairings-etc.com ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 06, 2005
From: Matt Dralle <dralle(at)matronics.com>
Dear Listers, I will be taking the Matronics Web Server down for a few hours today, Tuesday September 6 2005 for a chassis upgrade. Archive browsing and searching along with subscription services will be unavailable for be processed normally during the upgrade. Please check the Matronics System Status Page for updates (although this page resides on the web server and won't be available during the upgrade): http://www.matronics.com/SystemStatus/ Matt Dralle Matronics Email List Admin. Matt G Dralle | Matronics | PO Box 347 | Livermore | CA | 94551 925-606-1001 V | 925-606-6281 F | dralle(at)matronics.com Email http://www.matronics.com/ WWW | Featuring Products For Aircraft ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Ralph E. Capen" <recapen(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: RV6A mainwheel base dimension
Date: Sep 18, 2005
INNOCENT GLOBAL 0.0000 1.0000 -4.4912 Folks, I've checked the archives and have some partial answers.... What I am looking for is the center-of-tread to center-of tread distance between the main landing gear for an O360 CS equipped RV6A that is flying. Thanks, Ralph Capen ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Dick" <dick(at)rclabs.com>
Subject: Re: RV6A mainwheel base dimension
Date: Sep 18, 2005
Mine is 82 1/2" with about half full fuel tanks. Dick Wildman N164DF ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ralph E. Capen" <recapen(at)earthlink.net> Subject: RV6-List: RV6A mainwheel base dimension > > Folks, > > I've checked the archives and have some partial answers.... > > What I am looking for is the center-of-tread to center-of tread distance between the main landing gear for an O360 CS equipped RV6A that is flying. > > Thanks, > Ralph Capen > > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Travis Hamblen" <TravisHamblen(at)cox.net>
Subject: RV-6A for sale
Date: Sep 20, 2005
1999 RV-6A for sale $68,500.00. 415 Hobbs hours (about 350 tach hours) TTAF & Engine with a FACTORY NEW Lycoming O-320-D1A (160 h.p.). Sterba 68 x 76 prop best prop I have ever flown behind. Full professional panel with all new modern flight and engine instruments. Avmap EKP-IV color moving map GPS (7 inch screen). Bendix/King Comm and mode C transponder. Custom professional paint job that makes this RV a major eye catcher! Interior is finish painted to match exterior with basic upholstery. NO DAMAGE HISTORY and all construction logs, construction pictures, airframe/engine logs, and receipts back to day one! With a factory new engine this plane runs like a top and is one sweet plane that NEEDS NO WORK! Meets or exceeds all Vans performance numbers. Contact Travis by e-mail at TravisHamblen(at)cox.net or at 702-255-3635 for more info or pictures. Specs and pictures can be seen at: http://www.geocities.com/iflybygps/index.htm Travis Hamblen VGT (North Las Vegas) RV-6A For Sale RV-7A finishing finish kit and engine on order -- ________________________________________________________________________________
From: George Frost <ghfrost(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: flip up canopy seal, RV-6
Date: Sep 20, 2005
I flew in and out of a rain shower and quickly found out that the forward canopy seal leaked. I had tried a variety of sealing strips including weather strips, None of them would stay in place and did not really fill the non uniform gap between fuselage and canopy. I had heard that some flip up owners solved the problem only by avoiding rain. I tried something which seems to stay in place, fills the gap, and looks like it should be watertight. Borrowing Van's technique for sealing the air vent, pivoting doors, I coated the canopy with vaseline and laid in successive layers of clear RTV, gradually building up a gasket that firmly adheres to the fuselage and looks like it should seal properly. The canopy should be closed when the RTV is still uncured so that it forms to the space. It does require some trimming. I have not yet flown in the rain but have taken a precaution to cover my avionics with plastic sheet for the test. I also plan to quickly fly in and out of a rain shower first. I also have installed a thin plastic weatherstrip ( Frost King V-Seal, self stick, White M13W ) that is used in corners and has a longitudinal hinge point. I put this on the fuselage exterior in front of the gap where it will flip up when the canopy is open but is folded down over the canopy joint by the air stream. This strip is flat and quite thin ( approx .010 ). Since it is only about .5 wide on a side it requires an additional piece of strip to be added similar to lapped house siding in order to extend past the forward edge of edge of the open canopy. It will only work on the flat area on top, as the hinge will not fold when it goes around the curved portion of the fuselage. It does extend beyond the vulnerable avionics area. A drawing would work better to explain this but my scanner is down. If anyone is interested I could fax a drawing which someone could then send to any one else interested. I would also like to hear from anyone who has solved flip up leakage as it is entirely possible that my solution might not work. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 23, 2005
From: "Hollis Walter" <ardhlmsr(at)eocc.com>
Subject: re[21]
"Ci-iallis Sof-tabs" is better than Pfizer V-iiaggrra and normal Ci-ialis because: - Guarantes 36 hours lasting - Safe to take, no side effectts at all - Boost and increase se-xual perfoormance - Haarder e-rectiiions and quick recharge - Proven and c-ertified by e-xperts and d-octors - only $2 per tabs - Special offeer! These prices - are valid u-ntil 30th of September ! Cllick hereee: http://gsullivan-consulting.com depositor inhale hundredth perth seethe sari dreyfuss flagging wappinger pam classificatory demented fine dyeing brusque theretofore amateurish equipotent knowledge stu protozoan buxom siva nose dance inequitable coolheaded mung braggart document goldwater sanitate doldrum alive aura eclectic debility dogtooth argue fine barycentric mushroom atlantes ernie immobile bough shitepoke bayesian presentational whup anteroom debby accumulate grenade ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Sep 30, 2005
From: Bud Newhall <RV-6(at)comcast.net>
Subject: Builder assistance available
Greetings You want an RV but don't have the time to build it. I can help. I am a machinist by trade. I completed an RV-6 in 2200 hrs. (no prepunced holes) and assisted on 2 others. I am available to work on a project full time. I am located in Lodi, CA. Bud Newhall RV-6(at)comcast.net 209-334-2911 ________________________________________________________________________________
From: LessDragProd(at)aol.com
Date: Oct 04, 2005
Subject: MT Propeller 183-59 blade exchange offer
Hi All, MT Propeller and Less Drag Products, Inc. is offering a blade exchange program for the Lycoming 360 3 blade MT Propeller. If you have the MTV-12, or MTV-18, 3 blade MT Propeller on your Lycoming 360 engine, you can exchange your present 183-59 blades for the new 183-59b blades. You might be interested in this offer if you would like to remove the mid range RPM restriction on your Lycoming 360 engine, and increase your cruise speed by about 5 mph. MT Propeller is offering to exchange your present three 183-59 blades with a new set of 183-59b blades for about the same price as a single 183-59b blade. (The list price for a single replacement 183-59b blade is $2,430.) Less Drag Products, Inc. will coordinate the actual blade set replacement for your propeller, based on your location and replacement blade set availability. Please contact Less Drag Products, Inc. directly at _jim(at)lessdrag.com_ (mailto:jim(at)lessdrag.com) to obtain a schedule and cost estimate. Regards, Jim Ayers Less Drag Products, Inc. (805) 499-8646 FAX ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 09, 2005
From: Matt Dralle <dralle(at)matronics.com>
Subject: Photo Posting Enabled on RV6-List...
RV6 Listers, As of this morning, I have enabled limited posting of various picture formats to the RV6-List. Extensions allowed include: jpg, gif, bmp, txt, xls, pdf, and doc. Generally, these are all pretty safe and don't carry viruses of any kind. A word of caution when posting pictures, however. Double check the size of the pictures you are posting. This includes both the picture dimensions (X x Y) but also the total filesize (MB). If you take pictures right out of your digital camera, it is likely they will be on the order of 1-4MB each. If you post 10, 3MB photos to the List, you will be sending 30MB plus encoding (usually a 1.5x gain in size) to the list, that will have to be redistributed to all members on the list. That can be a lot of data! Use a program like Photoshop to reduce the dimensions of the photo to something on the order of 640x480 and use medium or better compression when saving the file so that each picture is roughly 50k to 100k in size. Let me know what you think of this addition to the RV6-List. Remember that the PhotoShare is also still available and generally the best way to share photos of an archival nature. Matt Dralle Matt G Dralle | Matronics | PO Box 347 | Livermore | CA | 94551 925-606-1001 V | 925-606-6281 F | dralle(at)matronics.com Email http://www.matronics.com/ WWW | Featuring Products For Aircraft ________________________________________________________________________________
From: MnwPeeps(at)aol.com
Date: Oct 11, 2005
Subject: Re: RV-6A for sale
Travis - Any offers in your price range? Just wondering. I have a -6A I might want to sell next year, and I'm hearing from a couple of guys selling theirs that everybody expects a really low deal these days, and this one guy had to reduce his asking from 60K to 50K, for a 6. He sold it for $50K. I have about 10 hrs. SMOH, and was hoping to recover most of that money if I sold, but I'm beginning to suspect I won't. Thx - Mike Wood - Boston ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 11, 2005
From: Balone Marine <balone_99(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: RV-6A for sale
I am selling my RV6 for $47,500 and I have been building A/C for over 60yr,s they still wount buy it . I am ready to give it away. Bud __________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Smcm75(at)aol.com
Date: Oct 11, 2005
Subject: Re: RV-6A for sale
In a message dated 10/11/2005 2:59:54 PM Eastern Standard Time, balone_99(at)yahoo.com writes: I am ready to give it away. Bud If you are giving it away, I'll Take it!. What is in it? Scott ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 12, 2005
From: Balone Marine <balone_99(at)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: RV-6A for sale
If you dont know what it is you dont get it. __________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________
From: Smcm75(at)aol.com
Date: Oct 12, 2005
Subject: Re: RV-6A for sale
In a message dated 10/12/2005 2:14:48 PM Eastern Standard Time, balone_99(at)yahoo.com writes: If you dont know what it is you dont get it. I know what it is but not what it has for avionics, engine, equipment etc. Maybe that why you are not getting the offers that you would want. The RV-6A including mine that have real value on the market have new or very low time engines (lycoming), props avionics, auto pilots, professional interiors etc. etc. etc. ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 12, 2005
From: Ron Lee <ronlee(at)pcisys.net>
Subject: Re: RV-6A for sale
At 02:09 PM 10/12/2005, you wrote: >In a message dated 10/12/2005 2:14:48 PM Eastern Standard Time, >balone_99(at)yahoo.com writes: >If you dont know what it is you dont get it. >I know what it is but not what it has for avionics, engine, equipment etc. >Maybe that why you are not getting the offers that you would want. The >RV-6A including mine that have real value on the market have new or very >low time engines (lycoming), props avionics, auto pilots, professional >interiors etc. etc. etc. And maybe not everyone wants all that fancy stuff. Each aircraft has an inherent value. When I looked for mine one would not have taken at least one (unless I could have salvaged some of it). Someone can price their 6A at $90K but expect the buyer pool to be very small. I will guestimate the majority of 6As are in the $60-70K range with some worth less and some worth more. Ron Lee ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 15, 2005
From: Matt Dralle <dralle(at)matronics.com>
Subject: Test 1 - Ignore...
This is a test, please ignore. (direct attachment) ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 15, 2005
From: Matt Dralle <dralle(at)matronics.com>
Subject: Test 2 - Ignore...
This is a test, please ignore. [] (inline attachment) ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 15, 2005
From: Matt Dralle <dralle(at)matronics.com>
Subject: Test 3 - Ignore...
This is a test, please ignore. [] (inline attachment, with styled encodeing) ________________________________________________________________________________
From: MnwPeeps(at)aol.com
Date: Oct 25, 2005
Subject: RV6-A for sale
My 1993 6-A is in great shape, 10 hours SMOH, performed by a very high quality shop - the same folks who built the original engine, which accumulated 2200 happy hours. New Sensenich. IFR panel, Garmin, autopilot, nice paint. New England area - will deliver. More details to interested parties. $68,000. Reply to _mnwpeeps(at)aol.com_ (mailto:tomnwpeeps(at)aol.com) ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 30, 2005
From: "Ron Carroll" <RonCarr(at)qwest.net>
Subject: fixed pitch prop question
My 6A has a history of low climb & low cruise RPM and high oil temps. My mechanic, neighbors and friends have exhausted every means we can think of, to no avail. I have a Lycoming O320-H2AD ( I really don't need negative feedback regarding the choice of engines ), and had it overhauled 43 hours ago. I hoped the overhaul would solve some of the problems, as it was in pretty poor condition. The overhaul made absolutely no difference in either RPM or high oil temp. I changed to a larger oil cooler, no change. I then made a nice plenum for the oil cooler, no change. I replaced the engine baffle seals, which made a slight change in oil temp. These things, along with many other minor things which were tried to satisfy various suggestions made by interested onlookers. The final thing my mechanic suggested was to have the Sensenich metal prop re-pitched, and recommended the prop shop in Troutdale, Oregon. I flew the plane, recorded some data I thought the shop would need in order to make the proper change. I was disappointed to find that the prop shop didn't want the data, they just need to know if I want better climb or cruise, I can't have both. They can add or remove pitch, whatever I say I need or want. They said that 1" pitch change would make about 25 to 35 RPM difference, so how much more or less RPM do I want under what condition? What I need is better climb (lower oil temp), and better cruise (?) at a higher RPM. The engine may go faster, but the plane may not. This means poor fuel economy. Broadly speaking, here are the performance figures I get: RPM MP Throttle IAS Altitude Oil 2200 22.8 WOT climb 100 kts sea level 77C 2240 22.8 WOT climb 110 kts contin. climb 98C 2390 25.8 WOT 138 kts 3000' 100C 2410 25.7 WOT 142 kts 3000' 100C 2040 19.4 econ cruise 124 kts 3000' 100C 2000 18.9 " " 115 kts 3000' 99C I know this is not very well arranged, nor is it very scientific, but its what I have for now. My friends with RVs claim that I should get better performance than this, both in air speed and RPM. My mechanic believes the high oil temps are due to too much pitch. The engine can never get into the 160 HP range. "It is working too hard and creating heat, like driving your car up hill in overdrive all the time.", he said. My question is this: Has anyone re-pitched their prop to gain RPM? If so, did it negatively affect your WOT cruise speed? Did it affect your oil temp? Do I have any other options (again, don't mention the engine, I've heard them all) ? This thing should fly better than this!!! Ron Carroll ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Robbie Attaway" <robbie(at)attawayair.com>
Subject: Re: fixed pitch prop question
Date: Oct 30, 2005
Hi Ron, Where did you get the engine? Was it on a flying a flying plane before you got it? Who overhauled it for you? The reason I ask is because I have seen new cams that had the timing marked incorrectly. One of those engines would not turn full RPMs but still ran and was flown about 3 hours. Robbie ----- Original Message ----- From: Ron Carroll To: rv6-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2005 2:27 PM Subject: RV6-List: fixed pitch prop question My 6A has a history of low climb & low cruise RPM and high oil temps. My mechanic, neighbors and friends have exhausted every means we can think of, to no avail. I have a Lycoming O320-H2AD ( I really don't need negative feedback regarding the choice of engines ), and had it overhauled 43 hours ago. I hoped the overhaul would solve some of the problems, as it was in pretty poor condition. The overhaul made absolutely no difference in either RPM or high oil temp. I changed to a larger oil cooler, no change. I then made a nice plenum for the oil cooler, no change. I replaced the engine baffle seals, which made a slight change in oil temp. These things, along with many other minor things which were tried to satisfy various suggestions made by interested onlookers. The final thing my mechanic suggested was to have the Sensenich metal prop re-pitched, and recommended the prop shop in Troutdale, Oregon. I flew the plane, recorded some data I thought the shop would need in order to make the proper change. I was disappointed to find that the prop shop didn't want the data, they just need to know if I want better climb or cruise, I can't have both. They can add or remove pitch, whatever I say I need or want. They said that 1" pitch change would make about 25 to 35 RPM difference, so how much more or less RPM do I want under what condition? What I need is better climb (lower oil temp), and better cruise (?) at a higher RPM. The engine may go faster, but the plane may not. This means poor fuel economy. Broadly speaking, here are the performance figures I get: RPM MP Throttle IAS Altitude Oil 2200 22.8 WOT climb 100 kts sea level 77C 2240 22.8 WOT climb 110 kts contin. climb 98C 2390 25.8 WOT 138 kts 3000' 100C 2410 25.7 WOT 142 kts 3000' 100C 2040 19.4 econ cruise 124 kts 3000' 100C 2000 18.9 " " 115 kts 3000' 99C I know this is not very well arranged, nor is it very scientific, but its what I have for now. My friends with RVs claim that I should get better performance than this, both in air speed and RPM. My mechanic believes the high oil temps are due to too much pitch. The engine can never get into the 160 HP range. "It is working too hard and creating heat, like driving your car up hill in overdrive all the time.", he said. My question is this: Has anyone re-pitched their prop to gain RPM? If so, did it negatively affect your WOT cruise speed? Did it affect your oil temp? Do I have any other options (again, don't mention the engine, I've heard them all) ? This thing should fly better than this!!! Ron Carroll ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 30, 2005
From: "Ron Carroll" <RonCarr(at)qwest.net>
Subject: Re: fixed pitch prop question
Robbie, I am not the builder of this plane, but he is a neighbor. He bought the engine from a company in British Columbia. They sold it to the builder as a fresh overhaul. I won't go into a lot of explanation here on the list, but I will say that at only 100 hours SMOH I had to have it overhauled by a local IA, as the whole engine was 'worn out' with inside measurements far out of specified overhaul limits. The cam was yellow tagged by a rebuilder here in Oregon at the time of the local OH. Because of the less than satisfactory performance the ignition timing, as well as the valve timing has been checked several times by my OH-IA. This would lead me to believe that the cam is properly timed. Thanks for your thoughts, and I hope everyone on the list appreciates my dilemma. Ron Carroll ----- Original Message ----- From: Robbie Attaway To: rv6-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2005 1:46 PM Subject: Re: RV6-List: fixed pitch prop question Hi Ron, Where did you get the engine? Was it on a flying a flying plane before you got it? Who overhauled it for you? The reason I ask is because I have seen new cams that had the timing marked incorrectly. One of those engines would not turn full RPMs but still ran and was flown about 3 hours. Robbie ----- Original Message ----- From: Ron Carroll To: rv6-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2005 2:27 PM Subject: RV6-List: fixed pitch prop question My 6A has a history of low climb & low cruise RPM and high oil temps. My mechanic, neighbors and friends have exhausted every means we can think of, to no avail. I have a Lycoming O320-H2AD ( I really don't need negative feedback regarding the choice of engines ), and had it overhauled 43 hours ago. I hoped the overhaul would solve some of the problems, as it was in pretty poor condition. The overhaul made absolutely no difference in either RPM or high oil temp. I changed to a larger oil cooler, no change. I then made a nice plenum for the oil cooler, no change. I replaced the engine baffle seals, which made a slight change in oil temp. These things, along with many other minor things which were tried to satisfy various suggestions made by interested onlookers. The final thing my mechanic suggested was to have the Sensenich metal prop re-pitched, and recommended the prop shop in Troutdale, Oregon. I flew the plane, recorded some data I thought the shop would need in order to make the proper change. I was disappointed to find that the prop shop didn't want the data, they just need to know if I want better climb or cruise, I can't have both. They can add or remove pitch, whatever I say I need or want. They said that 1" pitch change would make about 25 to 35 RPM difference, so how much more or less RPM do I want under what condition? What I need is better climb (lower oil temp), and better cruise (?) at a higher RPM. The engine may go faster, but the plane may not. This means poor fuel economy. Broadly speaking, here are the performance figures I get: RPM MP Throttle IAS Altitude Oil 2200 22.8 WOT climb 100 kts sea level 77C 2240 22.8 WOT climb 110 kts contin. climb 98C 2390 25.8 WOT 138 kts 3000' 100C 2410 25.7 WOT 142 kts 3000' 100C 2040 19.4 econ cruise 124 kts 3000' 100C 2000 18.9 " " 115 kts 3000' 99C I know this is not very well arranged, nor is it very scientific, but its what I have for now. My friends with RVs claim that I should get better performance than this, both in air speed and RPM. My mechanic believes the high oil temps are due to too much pitch. The engine can never get into the 160 HP range. "It is working too hard and creating heat, like driving your car up hill in overdrive all the time.", he said. My question is this: Has anyone re-pitched their prop to gain RPM? If so, did it negatively affect your WOT cruise speed? Did it affect your oil temp? Do I have any other options (again, don't mention the engine, I've heard them all) ? This thing should fly better than this!!! Ron Carroll ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 30, 2005
From: Tedd McHenry <tedd(at)vansairforce.org>
Subject: Re: fixed pitch prop question
Ron: You should certainly be able to get more than 2410 RPM at WOT and 3000 feet. I think your mechanic's hypothesis is quite reasonable (i.e. that the prop has too much pitch and is not allowing the engine to get to full power). What pitch is the prop now? At 2410 RPM and 140 knots your theoretical, no-slip pitch is 70.6 inches. So if that's about what your pitch is then the problem isn't pitch, it's that the engine isn't making full power. On the other hand, if your pitch is much higher, say 80 inches, then you're getting huge slip and the problem probably is the prop. I like Robbie Attaway's hypothesis about the cam timing. I've seen that mistake made with car engines (in fact, I've done it). Having the ignition advance way off could do it, too. Neither of those would explain the high oil temperature, but that could be unrelated. You can estimate the pitch change by calculating, 1200 x knots / (oldpitch x newpitch) where pitch is in inches. But if the pitch change results in a speed increase then the RPM increase will be slightly more than what you calculate. Tedd McHenry Surrey, BC, Canada ________________________________________________________________________________
Subject: fixed pitch prop question
Date: Oct 30, 2005
From: "Greg Young" <gyoung@cs-sol.com>
If you haven't done so, I'd check all the obvious engine specs again - use the manual, trust nothing. Like Robbie, we had a local RV with the cam off by one tooth. Another chasing similar poor performance ultimately found the tach off by 200 rpm. I'd also check carb model, jet #'s and actual measurements, throttle plate position, fuel flow, etc. Any chance of swapping props with someone else? It does sound over pitched. Are you certain it's the O-320 prop and not the O-360 model? Do you know what the pitch is currently so you can compare it to other O-320 RV-6's? Before you repitch, keep in mind there is a limit to the total inches of pitch change (8 IIRC) allowed. Good hunting. Greg Young ________________________________ From: owner-rv6-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv6-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Ron Carroll Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2005 4:24 PM To: rv6-list(at)matronics.com Subject: Re: RV6-List: fixed pitch prop question =09 =09 Robbie, I am not the builder of this plane, but he is a neighbor. He bought the engine from a company in British Columbia. They sold it to the builder as a fresh overhaul. I won't go into a lot of explanation here on the list, but I will say that at only 100 hours SMOH I had to have it overhauled by a local IA, as the whole engine was 'worn out' with inside measurements far out of specified overhaul limits. The cam was yellow tagged by a rebuilder here in Oregon at the time of the local OH. Because of the less than satisfactory performance the ignition timing, as well as the valve timing has been checked several times by my OH-IA. This would lead me to believe that the cam is properly timed. Thanks for your thoughts, and I hope everyone on the list appreciates my dilemma. Ron Carroll ----- Original Message ----- From: Robbie Attaway <mailto:robbie(at)attawayair.com> To: rv6-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2005 1:46 PM Subject: Re: RV6-List: fixed pitch prop question Hi Ron, Where did you get the engine? Was it on a flying a flying plane before you got it? Who overhauled it for you? The reason I ask is because I have seen new cams that had the timing marked incorrectly. One of those engines would not turn full RPMs but still ran and was flown about 3 hours. Robbie ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 30, 2005
From: rv6fly <rv6fly(at)bresnan.net>
Subject: Re: fixed pitch prop question
Ron Carroll wrote: > My question is this: Has anyone re-pitched their prop to gain RPM? > If so, did it negatively affect your WOT cruise speed? Did it affect > your oil temp? Do I have any other options (again, don't mention the > engine, I've heard them all) ? > > > Ron Carroll Ron, I found the following in the archive and hope it might shed a bit of light on your problem. I didn't have a oil temp problem. My cooler was mounted in the floor right behind the left inlet and worked very well. I had to put an adjustable door that I could close for winter flying. I had a spreadsheet somehwhere of the performance tests on my wood and then the before and after re-pitch on the Sensenich but have no idea where it is. On some old computer in the basement I'd reckon. "In the old days" it seems like everyone tried to pitch the prop so you would be a max rpms at wide open throttle at 7,500 feet. This would give you 75% power. This is how I finally set up my prop and it worked well on my RV6. Bob Skinner * I am building an RV-6a with an O320-E2D 150hp engine and plan on using a >Sensenich prop. It seems to be available in 4 pitch increments (75, 76, 77 >and 79). Has anyone evaluated a -6A with these props and 150hp and, if so, >can you share your experiences/results? We want to get the most out of the >150hp and I reckon that either the 76 or the 77 inch pitch will be the best >compomise for climb/cruise but I am curious to know how much one loses in >climb/gains in cruise with the 79 inch prop. I also expect that the 75 inch >pitch will reach the 2600 rpm limit quickly and sufer in cruise because of >it. > >Dave Irwin Dave, I'm using the Sensenich prop on my 150 hp RV-6. I started with the recommeded 77 pitch and ended up reducing the pitch to just tad under 75. My idea was to pitch the prop so that at 7,500-8,000 feet, I can operate at full throttle for best fuel/air distribution (because the carb butterfly is parallel to the fuel/air mixture) and not exceed the 2,600 rpm redline. The reduction in pitch did improve takeoff and climb a bit. Why would you suffer in cruise when running at 2,600 rpms? Doesn't rpms = h.p. and h.p. speed? You could improve take off and climb by reducing pitch further but would have to throttle back quite a bit in cruise. BTW, I had a wood prop on for a few hundred yours and then went to the Sensenich. My next six will have a constant speed. I hate like the dickens to spend the bucks but it's also frustrating to mess around with different props trying to fine tune performance. With a constant speed, you get maximum h.p. on take off which means you can climb to a safe altitude in case the engine quits and can clear obstructions. Besides, I'm getting tired of watching those show off constant speed guys blast off while I do my fixed pitched, shallow climb out:)* > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jim Wright" <jlwright@cox-internet.com>
Subject: fixed pitch prop question
Date: Oct 30, 2005
This is not totally unrelated so I thought I'd share. I had a 172 with a climb prop that cruised at 115 mph at 2350 RPM. I had another one the same year model and the same engine with a cruise prop. That one cruised at 125 mph at 2350 rpm's. The plane with the cruise prop burned at least 1 gallon per hour more than the climb prop at the same rpm. Overall I liked the climb prop much better. Jim Wright RV-9A 90919 Arkansas ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 30, 2005
From: David Leonard <wdleonard(at)gmail.com>
Subject: Re: fixed pitch prop question
Ron, You have gotten some great input so far on this thread. Someone asked you to compare the existing pitch to your performance and that is great advice to see if the problem is your prop. You also need to compare your fuel burn to you apparent power output (based on speed - keeping in mind that your speed is relatively slow). Poor BSFC would indicate an internal engine problem, despite the recent re-built (mistakes to happen during a rebuild). This could also explain increased oil temps. But looking at the numbers you posted the problem seems clear to me that you are not getting the manifold pressure you should be getting. In at 100kt climb at SL your MP should be greater than the altimeter setting. There is something wrong with the way air is getting into your engine. Assuming you would have found any obvious blockage, the problem could also be a strange boundary layer problem. Airflow problems could also cause the oil temp problem... Good luck. -- Dave Leonard Turbo Rotary RV-6 N4VY (fixed pitch and happy with it) http://members.aol.com/_ht_a/rotaryroster/index.html http://members.aol.com/_ht_a/vp4skydoc/index.html On 10/30/05, Ron Carroll wrote: > > My 6A has a history of low climb & low cruise RPM and high oil temps. My > mechanic, Roneighbors and friends have exhausted every means we can think > of, to no avail. I have a Lycoming O320-H2AD ( I really don't need negative > feedback regarding the choice of engines ), and had it overhauled 43 hours > ago. I hoped the overhaul would solve some of the problems, as it was in > pretty poor condition. The overhaul made absolutely no difference in > either RPM or high oil temp. > I changed to a larger oil cooler, no change. I then made a nice plenum > for the oil cooler, no change. I replaced the engine baffle seals, which > made a slight change in oil temp. These things, along with many other minor > things which were tried to satisfy various suggestions made by interested > onlookers. > The final thing my mechanic suggested was to have the Sensenich metal > prop re-pitched, and recommended the prop shop in Troutdale, Oregon. I flew > the plane, recorded some data I thought the shop would need in order to make > the proper change. I was disappointed to find that the prop shop didn't want > the data, they just need to know if I want better climb or cruise, I can't > have both. They can add or remove pitch, whatever I say I need or want. They > said that 1" pitch change would make about 25 to 35 RPM difference, so how > much more or less RPM do I want under what condition? What I need is better > climb (lower oil temp), and better cruise (?) at a higher RPM. The engine > may go faster, but the plane may not. This means poor fuel economy. > Broadly speaking, here are the performance figures I get: > *RPM* *MP* *Throttle* *IAS* *Altitude* *Oil* > ** > 2200 22.8 WOT climb 100 kts sea level 77C > 2240 22.8 WOT climb 110 kts contin. climb 98C > 2390 25.8 WOT 138 kts 3000' 100C > 2410 25.7 WOT 142 kts 3000' 100C > 2040 19.4 econ cruise 124 kts 3000' 100C > 2000 18.9 " " 115 kts 3000' 99C > I know this is not very well arranged, nor is it very scientific, but its > what I have for now. My friends with RVs claim that I should get better > performance than this, both in air speed and RPM. My mechanic believes the > high oil temps are due to too much pitch. The engine can never get into the > 160 HP range. "It is working too hard and creating heat, like driving your > car up hill in overdrive all the time.", he said. > My question is this: Has anyone re-pitched their prop to gain RPM? If so, > did it negatively affect your WOT cruise speed? Did it affect your oil temp? > Do I have any other options (again, don't mention the engine, I've heard > them all) ? > This thing should fly better than this!!! > Ron Carroll > ________________________________________________________________________________
From: WPAerial(at)aol.com
Date: Oct 30, 2005
Subject: Re: brake leak?
does anyone else have the brake caliber leak when the pads wares out? as soon as the pad gets almost to the rivets the piston (hockey puck thing) is close enough to full throw, the o-ring begins to leak. one good thing about this is it tells me the brakes need replaced, but is it supposed to happen? jerry wilken rv6a n699wp 370 hours albany oregon ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Robbie Attaway" <robbie(at)attawayair.com>
Subject: Re: fixed pitch prop question
Date: Oct 30, 2005
Ron, Call me at 602-538-6087 and I can tell you how to check the cam timing without pulling the engine apart. Robbie ----- Original Message ----- From: Ron Carroll To: rv6-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2005 3:23 PM Subject: Re: RV6-List: fixed pitch prop question Robbie, I am not the builder of this plane, but he is a neighbor. He bought the engine from a company in British Columbia. They sold it to the builder as a fresh overhaul. I won't go into a lot of explanation here on the list, but I will say that at only 100 hours SMOH I had to have it overhauled by a local IA, as the whole engine was 'worn out' with inside measurements far out of specified overhaul limits. The cam was yellow tagged by a rebuilder here in Oregon at the time of the local OH. Because of the less than satisfactory performance the ignition timing, as well as the valve timing has been checked several times by my OH-IA. This would lead me to believe that the cam is properly timed. Thanks for your thoughts, and I hope everyone on the list appreciates my dilemma. Ron Carroll ----- Original Message ----- From: Robbie Attaway To: rv6-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2005 1:46 PM Subject: Re: RV6-List: fixed pitch prop question Hi Ron, Where did you get the engine? Was it on a flying a flying plane before you got it? Who overhauled it for you? The reason I ask is because I have seen new cams that had the timing marked incorrectly. One of those engines would not turn full RPMs but still ran and was flown about 3 hours. Robbie ----- Original Message ----- From: Ron Carroll To: rv6-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2005 2:27 PM Subject: RV6-List: fixed pitch prop question My 6A has a history of low climb & low cruise RPM and high oil temps. My mechanic, neighbors and friends have exhausted every means we can think of, to no avail. I have a Lycoming O320-H2AD ( I really don't need negative feedback regarding the choice of engines ), and had it overhauled 43 hours ago. I hoped the overhaul would solve some of the problems, as it was in pretty poor condition. The overhaul made absolutely no difference in either RPM or high oil temp. I changed to a larger oil cooler, no change. I then made a nice plenum for the oil cooler, no change. I replaced the engine baffle seals, which made a slight change in oil temp. These things, along with many other minor things which were tried to satisfy various suggestions made by interested onlookers. The final thing my mechanic suggested was to have the Sensenich metal prop re-pitched, and recommended the prop shop in Troutdale, Oregon. I flew the plane, recorded some data I thought the shop would need in order to make the proper change. I was disappointed to find that the prop shop didn't want the data, they just need to know if I want better climb or cruise, I can't have both. They can add or remove pitch, whatever I say I need or want. They said that 1" pitch change would make about 25 to 35 RPM difference, so how much more or less RPM do I want under what condition? What I need is better climb (lower oil temp), and better cruise (?) at a higher RPM. The engine may go faster, but the plane may not. This means poor fuel economy. Broadly speaking, here are the performance figures I get: RPM MP Throttle IAS Altitude Oil 2200 22.8 WOT climb 100 kts sea level 77C 2240 22.8 WOT climb 110 kts contin. climb 98C 2390 25.8 WOT 138 kts 3000' 100C 2410 25.7 WOT 142 kts 3000' 100C 2040 19.4 econ cruise 124 kts 3000' 100C 2000 18.9 " " 115 kts 3000' 99C I know this is not very well arranged, nor is it very scientific, but its what I have for now. My friends with RVs claim that I should get better performance than this, both in air speed and RPM. My mechanic believes the high oil temps are due to too much pitch. The engine can never get into the 160 HP range. "It is working too hard and creating heat, like driving your car up hill in overdrive all the time.", he said. My question is this: Has anyone re-pitched their prop to gain RPM? If so, did it negatively affect your WOT cruise speed? Did it affect your oil temp? Do I have any other options (again, don't mention the engine, I've heard them all) ? This thing should fly better than this!!! Ron Carroll ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 30, 2005
From: "Ron Carroll" <RonCarr(at)qwest.net>
Subject: Re: fixed pitch prop question
This is in response to the latest message, which is from David Leonard, but I'd also like to make comments to others that are generous enough to offer some suggestions on my problem(s). Tedd McHenry - The pitch on my prop is 79". I had changed from 80" to 79" thinking it would make a difference, but the difference was not noticeable to me. I like the idea of calculating by using an equation, as you suggest, but I just want to make sure I understand your formula. You say '1200 times knots,divided by old pitch x newpitch' equal estimated pitch change. I tried this: 1200 X 160 kts divided by 79"X75" , and the answer is "32.40". What is this? I'll have to ask a couple of dumb questions: What is the significance of the '1200'? Next, what 'knots'? cruise? I should be able to figure this out, but its easier to ask. So, by using this, I should get a good ballpark pitch by plugging in different 'newpitch' numbers. BTW, my fuel burn at WOT was right at 8.5 gph. Greg Young - This problem has plagued me for over a year. EVERYTHING has been checked and rechecked, according to the book. My IA checked to be sure I have the correct carb & jets, the cam was checked, as was the ignition timing & valve timing. I wish there was someone with a Sensenich prop in the pitch range that I think I may wind up, but alas I don't. I can get the prop re-pitched for $200, and it can be re-pitched again if necessary for another $200, so I hope to get it close in the first try or two. Bob Skinner - You refer to a fellow that has a similar situation. One passage mentioned, "Why would you suffer in cruise when running at 2,600 rpms? Doesn't rpms h.p. and h.p. = speed? You could improve take off and climb by reducing pitch further but would have to throttle back quite a bit in cruise." This was my question; If I were to reduce the pitch so that the engine could reach 2600 in cruise, will I suffer in speed because the prop isn't taking as big a bite? I like your preference of a constant speed prop, but the cost is more than I care to spend. There are a LOT of happy campers flying fixed pitch props, only sacrificing a little in climb. Jim Wright - You mention that your 172 actually got a higher cruise with less pitch, and burned less fuel??? That's what I want!! Can I expect to fly faster and burn less fuel with less pitch? The variables are too many for a guy like me to be able to figure it out. I'm hoping that Tedd's formula will give me a better idea. David Leonard - David, yours has me the most puzzled. You say that I should compare existing pitch with performance. I don't understand this one at all. Also, I can't understand how I can get higher manifold pressure that the altimeter setting without using a blower. Could it be because of the ram effect of the intake air scoop? If so, wouldn't it always be higher at WOT? Another thing I don't know is 'BSFC'. I just Googled it, and find that it is 'Brake Specific Fuel Consumption', the ratio of fuel consumed (in lbs. per hour) to horsepower produced. I'm lost! I want to thank all of you who have so promptly responded to my questions. I'm not sure I have THE answer yet, but I'll hope that the pieces will start to fit. I'd like to know what pitch everyone else with the same plane/engine/prop (RV-6A, O320-H2AD-160, Sensenich metal prop (68x79)) combination are using successfully. I just want to re-pitch if necessary, and get it close to right the first time. I would also like to know if a flatter pitch will cost me in cruise (it can't go much slower). Ron Carroll - ----- Original Message ----- From: David Leonard To: rv6-list(at)matronics.com Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2005 5:15 PM Subject: Re: RV6-List: fixed pitch prop question Ron, You have gotten some great input so far on this thread. Someone asked you to compare the existing pitch to your performance and that is great advice to see if the problem is your prop. You also need to compare your fuel burn to you apparent power output (based on speed - keeping in mind that your speed is relatively slow). Poor BSFC would indicate an internal engine problem, despite the recent re-built (mistakes to happen during a rebuild). This could also explain increased oil temps. But looking at the numbers you posted the problem seems clear to me that you are not getting the manifold pressure you should be getting. In at 100kt climb at SL your MP should be greater than the altimeter setting. There is something wrong with the way air is getting into your engine. Assuming you would have found any obvious blockage, the problem could also be a strange boundary layer problem. Airflow problems could also cause the oil temp problem... Good luck. -- Dave Leonard Turbo Rotary RV-6 N4VY (fixed pitch and happy with it) http://members.aol.com/_ht_a/rotaryroster/index.html http://members.aol.com/_ht_a/vp4skydoc/index.html On 10/30/05, Ron Carroll wrote: My 6A has a history of low climb & low cruise RPM and high oil temps. My mechanic, Roneighbors and friends have exhausted every means we can think of, to no avail. I have a Lycoming O320-H2AD ( I really don't need negative feedback regarding the choice of engines ), and had it overhauled 43 hours ago. I hoped the overhaul would solve some of the problems, as it was in pretty poor condition. The overhaul made absolutely no difference in either RPM or high oil temp. I changed to a larger oil cooler, no change. I then made a nice plenum for the oil cooler, no change. I replaced the engine baffle seals, which made a slight change in oil temp. These things, along with many other minor things which were tried to satisfy various suggestions made by interested onlookers. The final thing my mechanic suggested was to have the Sensenich metal prop re-pitched, and recommended the prop shop in Troutdale, Oregon. I flew the plane, recorded some data I thought the shop would need in order to make the proper change. I was disappointed to find that the prop shop didn't want the data, they just need to know if I want better climb or cruise, I can't have both. They can add or remove pitch, whatever I say I need or want. They said that 1" pitch change would make about 25 to 35 RPM difference, so how much more or less RPM do I want under what condition? What I need is better climb (lower oil temp), and better cruise (?) at a higher RPM. The engine may go faster, but the plane may not. This means poor fuel economy. Broadly speaking, here are the performance figures I get: RPM MP Throttle IAS Altitude Oil 2200 22.8 WOT climb 100 kts sea level 77C 2240 22.8 WOT climb 110 kts contin. climb 98C 2390 25.8 WOT 138 kts 3000' 100C 2410 25.7 WOT 142 kts 3000' 100C 2040 19.4 econ cruise 124 kts 3000' 100C 2000 18.9 " " 115 kts 3000' 99C I know this is not very well arranged, nor is it very scientific, but its what I have for now. My friends with RVs claim that I should get better performance than this, both in air speed and RPM. My mechanic believes the high oil temps are due to too much pitch. The engine can never get into the 160 HP range. "It is working too hard and creating heat, like driving your car up hill in overdrive all the time.", he said. My question is this: Has anyone re-pitched their prop to gain RPM? If so, did it negatively affect your WOT cruise speed? Did it affect your oil temp? Do I have any other options (again, don't mention the engine, I've heard them all) ? This thing should fly better than this!!! Ron Carroll ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Dick DeCramer" <diesel(at)rconnect.com>
Subject: Re: brake leak?
Date: Oct 30, 2005
Jerry, I remember a few years ago that I had to pull the pistons on my brakes to determine if the o-ring groove was machined properly to prevent o-ring blowout. The problem is I can't remember where I got the information alerting me to the problem. I did check vansaircraft.com but nothing is there but it might be a manufacturers bulletin or an AD. I think some of the pistons had an groove machined off center which could be what you have. Some of you other listers remember anything about this? You may want to call the manufacturer for more info. Dick DeCramer RV6 N500DD 95 hours Minnesota ----- Original Message ----- From: Subject: RV6-List: Re: brake leak? does anyone else have the brake caliber leak when the pads wares out? as soon as the pad gets almost to the rivets the piston (hockey puck thing) is close enough to full throw, the o-ring begins to leak. one good thing about this is it tells me the brakes need replaced, but is it supposed to happen? jerry wilken rv6a n699wp 370 hours albany oregon ________________________________________________________________________________
From: WPAerial(at)aol.com
Date: Oct 31, 2005
Subject: Re: brake leak?
afew years ago thay had some pistons put in backwards. that is not the case with mine. jerry wilken ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 30, 2005
From: Tedd McHenry <tedd(at)vansairforce.org>
Subject: Re: fixed pitch prop question
Ron: Sorry, looking back on my post I see that what I said was very unclear. The formula estimates RPM change per inch of pitch change. In other words, the value you calculated (32.4) is how much the RPM would change for each inch of pitch change. The 1200 is a constant that factors in the odd mix of units (revolutions per minute, nautical miles per hour, and inches of pitch). It's actually 1216, but 1200 is close enough. But that formula only works for pitch changes of 1 inch at a time. It might be better to calculate the "no slip" speed for your prop and compare it to what you're actually getting. speed = RPM x pitch / 1216 By that calculation, your 79" pitch prop would give you 157 knots at 2410 RPM, with no slip at all. Your measured speed was 142, so that's about 10 percent slip. I think that's on the high side for cruise conditions, lending support to the theory that you have too much pitch. But it's hard to get good information on how much slip is typical. The no-slip pitch that gives 142 knots at 2410 RPM is 71.6 inches. I'm guessing the ideal pitch for your airplane is somewhere between where you are (79") and 71.6". But I think you should assure yourself that the engine isn't the problem, before you re-pitch the prop. I agree with what Dave Leonard said about your manifold pressure sounding low. Could you have an intake restriction of some kind? Does the throttle actually open all the way? (Dumb question, I know, but it happens.) Tedd ________________________________________________________________________________
Date: Oct 30, 2005
From: David Leonard <wdleonard(at)gmail.com>
Subject: Re: fixed pitch prop question
Ron, David Leonard - > David, yours has me the most puzzled. You say that I should compare > existing pitch with performance. I don't understand this one at all. > I was just agreeing with Tedd McHenry. There is a formula (and some spreadsheets you can use) to calculate approximate performance based on prop pitch and RPM. If you are finding that you are significantly off from this performance, then the problem is either a significant increase in drag, or a poorly designed propeller (not just the pitch) Also, I can't understand how I can get higher manifold pressure that the > altimeter setting without using a blower. Could it be because of the ram > effect of the intake air scoop? If so, wouldn't it always be higher at WOT? > Correct. At a minimum, running static at sea level you should be seeing a manifold pressure of 27 or 28 (slightly less than the altimeter setting). Most RV's have a dynamic plenum to recover aerodynamic pressure that gives an additional 1-2 inches. Even if your engine is run out and the propeller is poorly pitched you should be seeing the appropriate manifold pressure. IMHO, if those numbers you sent are correct, the problem is an air restriction somewhere - no doubt about it. Another thing I don't know is 'BSFC'. I just Googled it, and find that it > is 'Brake Specific Fuel Consumption', the ratio of fuel consumed (in lbs. > per hour) to horsepower produced. I'm lost! > Correct. What I mean is that if the problem is the pitch of your prop(or an air restriction for that matter), then it shouldn't change your BSFC (i.e. you should be burning an amount of fuel appropriate for the horse power you are producing). There will be a natural variation in BSFC between engines airplanes and propellers, but that variation is usually not a huge amount. If you are burning more fuel than you should be for the speed you are getting, then there is still a serious problem with you engine or carb. How do you tell? The best way is to do a head to head comparison with a similarly configured RV flying the same route at the same speed at the same time. Carefully measure fuel burned in both aircraft and it should be roughly the same. If you don't have another RV to use you can compare your performance to Vans published numbers.... or numbers published in the archives... you get the idea. But I still think your problem is some sort of air restriction. > > -- > Dave Leonard > Turbo Rotary RV-6 N4VY > http://members.aol.com/_ht_a/rotaryroster/index.html > http://members.aol.com/_ht_a/vp4skydoc/index.html ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Mark Taylor" <mtaylo17(at)msn.com>
Subject: RE: RV6-List Digest: 15 Msgs - 10/30/05
Date: Oct 31, 2005
Ron, This might sound a daft question, but is the plane completely finished, with all the wheel fairings on and everything? A friend of mine thought he had similar problems, with his plane being a good 20mph slower and an inability to get full engine rpm in climb and cruise. It turned out to be all the extra drag from no fairings! Mark. www.4sierratango.com From: "Ron Carroll" <RonCarr(at)qwest.net> Subject: RV6-List: fixed pitch prop question My 6A has a history of low climb & low cruise RPM and high oil temps. My mechanic, neighbors and friends have exhausted every means we can think of, to no avail. I have a Lycoming O320-H2AD ( I really don't need negative feedback regarding the choice of engines ), and had it overhauled 43 hours ago. I hoped the overhaul would solve some of the problems, as it was in pretty poor condition. The overhaul made absolutely no difference in either RPM or high oil temp. I changed to a larger oil cooler, no change. I then made a nice plenum for the oil cooler, no change. I replaced the engine baffle seals, which made a slight change in oil temp. These things, along with many other minor things which were tried to satisfy various suggestions made by interested onlookers. The final thing my mechanic suggested was to have the Sensenich metal prop re-pitched, and recommended the prop shop in Troutdale, Oregon. I flew the plane, recorded some data I thought the shop would need in order to make the proper change. I was disappointed to find that the prop shop didn't want the data, they just need to know if I want better climb or cruise, I can't have both. They can add or remove pitch, whatever I say I need or want. They said that 1" pitch change would make about 25 to 35 RPM difference, so how much more or less RPM do I want under what condition? What I need is better climb (lower oil temp), and better cruise (?) at a higher RPM. The engine may go faster, but the plane may not. This means poor fuel economy. Broadly speaking, here are the performance figures I get: RPM MP Throttle IAS Altitude Oil 2200 22.8 WOT climb 100 kts sea level 77C 2240 22.8 WOT climb 110 kts contin. climb 98C 2390 25.8 WOT 138 kts 3000' 100C 2410 25.7 WOT 142 kts 3000' 100C 2040 19.4 econ cruise 124 kts 3000' 100C 2000 18.9 " " 115 kts 3000' 99C I know this is not very well arranged, nor is it very scientific, but its what I have for now. My friends with RVs claim that I should get better performance than this, both in air speed and RPM. My mechanic believes the high oil temps are due to too much pitch. The engine can never get into the 160 HP range. "It is working too hard and creating heat, like driving your car up hill in overdrive all the time.", he said. My question is this: Has anyone re-pitched their prop to gain RPM? If so, did it negatively affect your WOT cruise speed? Did it affect your oil temp? Do I have any other options (again, don't mention the engine, I've heard them all) ? This thing should fly better than this!!! Ron Carroll ________________________________________________________________________________
From: "Jim Wright" <jlwright@cox-internet.com>
Subject: fixed pitch prop question
Date: Oct 31, 2005


September 28, 2003 - October 31, 2005

RV6-Archive.digest.vol-ad